The new European Aerodrome Safety Rules - caa.me · The new European Aerodrome Safety Rules Gernot...
21
The new European Aerodrome Safety Rules Gernot KESSLER Head of Section, Airports 6 th November 2014
Transcript of The new European Aerodrome Safety Rules - caa.me · The new European Aerodrome Safety Rules Gernot...
The new European Aerodrome Safety Rules
Gernot KESSLER Head of Section, Airports 6th November 2014
2
What it is all about:
A new regulatory regime for our top 500 airports!
Robust
Modern
Fit for purpose
Flexible
Harmonised
Continuity
3
What it is all about:
Flexible
Harmonised
Continuity
4
What it is all about: 3 Key Challenges
Flexible
Harmonised
Continuity
Find best way to address local / individual design issues
Identify adequate level of harmonisation and uniformity
Install new rules but do not disrupt operation of the running system; Minimise burden
Migration: Yes, Revolution: No
Economic regulation
Performance regulation
Interoperability regulation
Safety regulation
EASA total aviation system approach
The Principle: Building up the house of safety
5
6
Regulation (EEC)
No 1592 / 2002
Competence EASA Regulation
Airworthiness
Environmental compatibility Initial
Regulation (EEC)
No 216 / 2008
Flight Crew Licensing (FCL)
Operation of Aircraft (OPS)
Safety of foreign operators
1st ext.
Regulation (EEC)
No 1108 / 2010
Aerodromes
Air Traffic Management (ATM)
Air Navigation Services (ANS)
2nd ext.
The 2nd Extension
The Principle: Building up the house of safety
EASA “Basic Regulation“ (“BR“)
7
Hierarchy of EU / EASA rules and provisions
EA
SA
E
C
Co
un
cil / E
P
Essential requirements
Acceptable Means of Compliance
Certification Specifications
Implementing Rules
Guidance Material
Binding
Non-
binding
A
DR
Ru
le D
evelo
pm
en
t
8
Hierarchy of EU / EASA rules and provisions
EA
SA
E
C
Co
un
cil / E
P
Essential requirements
Acceptable Means of Compliance
Certification Specifications
Implementing Rules
Guidance Material
Binding
Non-
binding
EA
SA
BR
9
For DESIGN:
ICAO based (Annex 14 and design manual)
Spirit: “light touch“
“Hardware“ , ADR design:
Continuity
Individuality needed!
High discretion for authorities!
No hard law, only specifications
ADR Rules: Context, Specials by BR
10
For AUTHORITIES and OPERATORS:
ICAO based (Annex 14 and Annex 19) Aerodrome Operations manual
Spirit: “light touch“
“Operations“ , “Organisations“:
Best practices
Ahead of Annex 19
Adaptable to smaller entities
High discretion for authorities!
ADR Rules: Context, Specials by BR
11
IRs
Flexibility: Certification Basis
ADR Certificate
AMC GM
ADR OR & OPS Ref. BR Art. 8a.5
IRs = Implementing Rules CSs = Certification Specifications ELOS= Equivalent Level of Safety SC= Special Condition GM= Guidance Material AMC= Acceptable Means of Compliance
12
ADR Infrastructure Ref. BR Art. 8a.2(b)
IRs
Flexibility: Certification Basis
Certification Basis (CB)
CSs ELOS
SC
ADR Certificate
GM AMC GM
ADR OR & OPS Ref. BR Art. 8a.5
IRs = Implementing Rules CSs = Certification Specifications ELOS= Equivalent Level of Safety SC= Special Condition GM= Guidance Material AMC= Acceptable Means of Compliance
13
ADR Infrastructure Ref. BR Art. 8a.2(b)
Flexibility: Certification Basis
Certification Basis (CB)
CSs ELOS
SC
ADR Certificate
GM
ADR OPS Ref. BR Art. 8a.5
EASA
- No “hard law“ for ADR infrastructure - Individual process - Involving high level of NAA‘s discretion - ELOS and SC as safe option, alternative
to CS, in order to respect individual challenges (innovation, terrain, obstacles, etc)
14
ADR Infrastructure Ref. BR Art. 8a.2(b)
Flexibility: CB and “DAAD“
Certification Basis (CB)
CSs ELOS
SC
ADR Certificate
GM For existing deviations only: Additional option of acceptance via “DAAD“ mechanism Ref. Draft Cover Regulation, Art. 7
ADR OPS Ref. BR Art. 8a.5
EASA
- No “hard law“ for ADR infrastructure - Individual process - Involving high level of NAA‘s discretion - ELOS and SC as safe option, alternative
to CS, in order to respect individual challenges (innovation, terrain, obstacles, etc)
15
ADR Rules: Keys, Intention and Spirit
Subsidiarity: - Certification at MS level,
- Local solutions to local problems
Continuity: - Minimized impact,
- No undue burden,
- No disruption of competences within MS,
- Migration into future EU based regulatory system
Evolution only, high level of stability and continuity
16
Specificities of the Airport Rules
Ample room for discretion at national level
Unique flexibility tools
Ways to ‘carry over‘ existing local solutions
Provisions to avoid/reduce ‘paperwork‘ burden
A look at ‘the roots’: The ICAO annexes
Annex 14 – Aerodrome Design and
Operations
Annex 1 to Annex 19 – all aspects
of Aviation
ICAO SARPS vs. EU system of “Certification specifications“
Recommendation
ICAO EU
CS
GM Documents
Standard Binding
Non-Binding
„Will conform“ *
Assistance Assistance
„Will endeavour to conform“ *
* Reference: Annex 14, Foreword, 1.a
(IR)
18
Standard
Recommendation
ICAO EU
CS
GM Documents
ADR Certificate
ADR Infra. Certificate
Recommendation
CS
+
ELOS, SC, DAAD
+
individual local solutions
Standard
NO DIFFERENCE IN BINDINGNESS, ROOM FOR INDIVIDUAL DECISION !
ICAO SARPS vs. EU CS system: ADR Infrastructure Certificate
19
Current regulations structure
20
