Final 14-05-08 Print
-
Upload
shelly-ann-peart-james -
Category
Documents
-
view
171 -
download
2
Transcript of Final 14-05-08 Print
Stress and Coping
Table of Contents
List of Tables and Figures.......................................................................................3Chapter 1 - Background to the Study......................................................................4
Introduction.........................................................................................................4Statement of the Problem.....................................................................................4Justification for the Study....................................................................................6Purpose of the Study............................................................................................7Significance of the Study......................................................................................9Objectives of the Study.........................................................................................9Research Hypotheses.........................................................................................10Operationalization of Terms..............................................................................10
Chapter 2 – Literature Review...............................................................................12Perceived Stress.................................................................................................12Coping................................................................................................................15
Dispositional and Situational Coping...........................................................19Gender and Coping........................................................................................19Adaptive and Maladaptive Coping................................................................21
Substance Use - An Emotion-Focused Coping Mechanism..............................22Cannabis........................................................................................................22Cigarettes.......................................................................................................25Alcohol...........................................................................................................26
Students at the Mona Campus of the UWI.........................................................29Chapter 3 - Methodology.......................................................................................34
Sample................................................................................................................35Research Design................................................................................................36Instrumentation..................................................................................................37Procedures for Collecting Data.........................................................................38Data Analysis.....................................................................................................39
Chapter 4 - Results.................................................................................................41Perceived Stress Levels Among Respondents....................................................44
Perceived Stress and Gender.........................................................................45Objective1. Frequency of Substance Use as a Coping Mechanism...................46
Substance Use Coping and Gender, Residential Status and Faculty............47Hypothesis One..............................................................................................47
Objective 2. The Substance Most Frequently Used as Coping Mechanism.....48Objective3. Coping Styles Most Frequently Used by Students.........................49Objective 4. Analysis of the Impact of Expectation of Substance Effect on the Relationship between Level of Perceived Stress and Substance Use Coping. . .50
Hypothesis 2...................................................................................................51Students’ Perceptions of Substances.............................................................52
Chapter 5 - Discussion...........................................................................................53Objective1. Frequency of Substance Use as a Coping Mechanism...................53Objective 2. The Substance Most Frequently Used as a Coping Mechanism. .54Objective3. Coping Styles Most Frequently Used by Students.........................56
Gender and Coping........................................................................................57
1
Stress and Coping
Objective 4. Analysis of the Impact of Expectation of Substance Effect on the Relationship between Level of Perceived Stress and Substance Use Coping. . .57Limitations.........................................................................................................58Recommendations..............................................................................................59Suggestions for Future Research.......................................................................60Conclusion.........................................................................................................60
References..............................................................................................................62Appendix A............................................................................................................68Appendix B............................................................................................................73
2
Stress and Coping
List of Tables and Figures
Figure 1.1 Folkman and Lazarus’ Transactional Stress and Coping Model……..17
Figure 1.1 Gender Distribution at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus……………….……….....30
Table 1.1 Population Distribution at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus…………….......................31
Figure 3.1 Research Design Diagram……………………………………………35
Table 3.2 Sample Selection ……………………………………………………...37
Figure 4.2 Gender Distribution…………………………………………………..38
Figure 4.1 Faculty Distribution…………………………………………………..39
Table 4.1 Age Distribution……………………………………………………....40
Figure 4.3 Perceived Stress Frequency Distribution..…………………………... 42
Table 4.2 Stress Category Distribution by Gender……………………………....43
Figure 4.4 Substance Use Coping Distribution…….................... ……………….43
Table 4.3 Distribution of Substance Use Coping Scores by Gender…………….44
Figure 4.5 Relationship between Perceived Stress and Substance Use Coping…………………………………………………………..……….45
Table 4.4 Frequency of CCA Use……………………………………………….46
Figure 4.6 Means Plot of Expectation of Substance Use and Substance Use Coping Mean Scores……………………………......48
3
Stress and Coping
Chapter 1 - Background to the Study
Introduction
Levels of perceived stress among students of the Mona campus of the
University of the West Indies and the coping styles in which they engage are the
areas of interest for this research. How students cope with “daily hassles” or life
events has consistently been an area of interest for researchers (Matheny, Ashby
& Cupp, 2005; O’Hare & Sherrer, 1997; Dyson & Park, 2006; Robotham &
Julian, 2006; Shang & Zhang, 2007; Gencoz, Gencoz, & Bozo, 2006; Herrington
et. al, 2005; Sasaki & Yamasaki, 2007; Struthers, Perry & Menec, 2000).
However, this researcher is particularly interested in students’ choice of coping
style and more so whether they use substances as part of their approach to coping
with stress. This issue will be examined in this study, along with associated
topics inclusive of trends in their coping behaviours.
Statement of the Problem
Perceived stress and coping are areas which have been thoroughly
researched in the United States, Europe, Japan and in some developing nations
(Matheny & Cupp, 2005; Matheny, Ashby, & Cupp, 2005; Gencoz, Gencoz &
Bozo, 2006, & Yamasaki, 2007; Struthers, Perry & Menec, 2000). However,
research in this field has been limited in the Caribbean. Furthermore, examining
the use of psychoactive substances as coping techniques for perceived stress is an
even less studied area in the Jamaican setting. Most of the research conducted in
Jamaica has been focused on life events or physiological aspects of stress and not
on perceptions of stress (Lindo, 2003; Duncan, 2000; Scott-Fisher, 1999). In
4
Stress and Coping
addition, several of the studies were focused on specific groups such as
adolescents, primary school students or vocational groups such as teachers,
doctors, and police officers (Oo, 2002; Williams, 1993; Edwards, 1988;
Freckleton, 1984; Andrews, 1980). Understanding the relationship between
perceived stress and coping, particularly the use of substances as an effort to cope
is crucial for the development of appropriate health education programmes.
Carver (1997) discusses the categorization of coping styles into emotion-focused
and problem/solution-focused. He describes the former as approaches which do
not result in any change in the stressful situation but in the feelings aroused by it
and the latter as attempts to solve the problem. Carver’s categories will be
employed in this study. Substance use as a coping technique will be classified as
an emotion-focused technique. It is arguable that some substances such as
depressants have calming effects on an organism (Coomber, Oliver, & Morris,
2003) and as such may be useful in addressing the actual problem. However, in
this study, this and other beneficial effects of substances are seen as methods of
managing the emotions evoked by the stressful situation. Studies have been
conducted which demonstrate an association between the use of alcohol as a
tension reducer and problem drinking among college students (O’Hare & Sherrer,
1997). Problem drinking was defined in O’Hare and Sherrer’s study as the
consumption of alcoholic beverages significantly correlated with arrests and
incidents reported to campus security. This finding is significant for the current
study although the focus is not on problem drinking or other problematic
substance use. Its significance lies in the recognition of the potential for the
5
Stress and Coping
development of problem drinking behaviours out of the use of drinking as a
tension reducer. Graduates of the University of the West Indies become leaders in
Caribbean society and as such are predisposed to experiencing high demands
placed on their coping resources. Developing healthy coping skills will be an
invaluable accomplishment for students, future leaders in commerce, government,
medicine, and other areas. As such, the undertakings of the present study can be
appreciated in light of its potential for contributing to the development of the
students at the Mona campus of the University of the West Indies. Given the
relationship between stress-coping and health, Sarafino and Ewing (1999) noted
that "being able to assess and reduce student stress is an important concern for
college counseling and health centers because of students' many adjustment and
physical health problems" (cited in Matheny, Ashby & Cupp, 2005).
Justification for the Study
The use and abuse of substances by University students is a perennial and
pervasive problem internationally (O’Hare & Sherrer, 1997; Baer et. al, 2001).
Several studies have shown that binge drinking, cannabis and tobacco misuse are
prevalent on University campuses in the United States of America and in Europe
(Baer et. al, 2001; Wallenstein, Pigeon, Kopans, Jacobs, Aseltine, 2007). An
association has also been found between the use of alcohol as a tension reducer
and problem drinking (O’Hare & Sherrer, 1997). Studies have repeatedly shown
that individuals use drinking in an attempt to cope with stress (P.E. Baer,
Garmezy, McLaughlin, Pokorny, & Wernick, 1987; M. Seeman, Seeman, &
Budros, 1988 as cited in Taylor, 2003). Perceived stress varies from person to
6
Stress and Coping
person, making the transition into university life an experience rated more or less
stressful by different individuals. Arguably, perceived stress may influence one’s
ability to cope and also the methods employed in the coping process. It is
therefore, crucial to understand the relationship between perception of stress and
the use of substances as coping techniques among students of the University of
the West Indies, Mona Campus.
The lack of data on the prevalence of substance use among students of the
Mona campus makes reliance on national data and overseas data for college
campuses mandatory for this study. However, local trends indicate first use of
cigarettes and alcohol to occur at ages 15 and 13 respectively for males (Douglas,
2000). Studies have not yet been conducted which seek to identify whether
substance users in Jamaica engage in the use of substances for their tension
reducing effects or more so as a social practice. The current research focuses on
the use of substances as a coping mechanism for stress and will identify students’
perceptions of the potentially harmful and beneficial effects of substances.
Purpose of the Study
Substance use has been studied as a subset of problematic behaviours.
The use of substances is seen as contributing to health problems by some and as a
means of enjoyment or entertainment by others. This study examines the use of
substances by university students as a coping mechanism for stress. The students’
perception of the substances as having harmful, beneficial, or mixed effects upon
them is the value placed upon the use of the substances. The substances which
7
Stress and Coping
will be focused on in this study are Cannabis Sativa (Ganja), Nicotine
(Cigarettes), and Alcohol (CCA).
The study seeks to identify the drug of choice among students of the
University of the West Indies when experiencing feelings of stress. It is also
designed to determine whether these students’ perception of the drugs’ effect on
them will impact upon whether they engage in the use of substances as a coping
mechanism for stress. The study provides information regarding the following:
i. Levels of perceived stress
ii. Most frequently used coping styles
iii. Students’ perceptions of the effects of substances (CCA)
iv. Frequency of students’ use of CCA as a coping mechanism
If significant relationships and patterns are identified in the research, the
information will be passed on to the University’s Health Centre. The aim of this
is to inform their development of substance awareness programmes. For instance,
posters on health issues are regularly displayed at the Health Centre. Given the
information generated by this research, staff at the facility may be able to develop
posters or other campaigns to educate students about the effects of substances.
The necessity of passing on the data will depend on students’ responses to items
on the Stress and Coping Style Questionnaire. One such item asks respondents to
identify which of six drugs are addictive. Of the six drugs, it is a well
documented fact that all but cannabis and ecstasy are agreed upon to be
chemically addictive (Taylor, 2003). Health centre staff and administrators may
find it a worthwhile task to provide more information on drugs of addiction if a
8
Stress and Coping
large percentage of students are currently misinformed about substances such as
heroine and crack/ cocaine.
Significance of the Study
There is currently no literature available on the topic of stress, coping, and
substance use as a coping mechanism of students at the Mona Campus of the
University of the West Indies. The current work is the first of its kind in this
setting. Additionally, it will contribute to the literature on stress and coping in
Jamaica a topic which has not been adequately examined in this country. The
research which has been conducted has focused primarily on stress responses,
indicators and the implications of high stress levels for certain vocations (Duncan,
2000; Henriques-Piper, 1998). Furthermore, the distinctive aspect of this research
is that it is looking at substance use as a coping mechanism which has not yet
been examined locally. This feature allows for contribution to be made to the
literature on substance use among Jamaicans, and particularly university students
in Jamaica.
Objectives of the Study
The major objectives of the study are as follows:
1. To provide reliable data on the frequency of substance use as a coping
technique among students at the Mona campus.
2. To discover the substance most frequently used as a coping technique by
students at the Mona campus.
3. To discover the coping style most frequently used by students at the Mona
Campus.
9
Stress and Coping
4. To analyze the impact of expectations of the substance as a mediating
factor between the level of perceived stress and the use of substances as a
coping mechanism.
Research Hypotheses
The hypotheses which will be tested in this research are:
1. There will be a positive relationship between the level of perceived stress
and the use of substances as a coping technique.
2. The likelihood of the use of substances as a coping technique will increase
if the substances are considered to have positive effects.
Operationalization of Terms
The following key concepts discussed in this study are delineated as
follows:
i. Perceived stress will refer to the individual’s appraisal of stressful
situation(s) in his/ her life.
ii. Coping will refer to the resources, both internal and external, which
the individual possesses and employs to manage the stress. Coping
will be categorized into two types:
a. Solution-focused coping - incorporates methods which seek to
address the problem.
b. Emotion-focused coping – incorporates methods which seek to
reduce the emotional distress being experienced as a result of
the problem.
10
Stress and Coping
iii. Substance Use is being delineated as the use of any psychoactive
substance, including but not limited to cannabis, cigarettes, and
alcohol.
iv. Substance use- An emotion-focused coping mechanism refers to the
use of psychoactive substances in efforts to reduce the emotional
distress experienced as a result of levels of perceived stress.
In light of the relationship between perceived stress and coping which has
been demonstrated in previous research (Matheny & Ashby, 2005; Herrington et.
Al, 2005) the current study will examine the dynamics of that relationship as it
pertains to students at the Mona campus of the University of the West Indies.
Extant literature in this field will be reviewed highlighting the findings related to
gender (Matheny, Ashby, & Cupp, 2005) and the various dimensions of coping
such as situational and dispositional coping (Sasaki & Yamasaki, 2002);
maladaptive and adaptive coping styles (Gan, Shang, & Zhang, 2007). Findings
related to the use of substances as a coping mechanism (O’Hare & Sherrer, 1997)
and the potential harmful (Baer et. al, 2001; Abel, 2003) and beneficial effects
(Coomber, Oliver, & Morris, 2003) of substance use will also be discussed.
Prevalence data for Jamaica will also be presented (Douglas, 2000). The
discussion of the research methodology will present the details of sample
distribution, research design and data analysis used in the study. The findings and
discussion will present the trends in the sample and demonstrate significant
relationships between variables. Limitations, recommendations and suggestions
for future study arising from the work will also be presented.
11
Stress and Coping
Chapter 2 – Literature Review
Perceived Stress
Stress has been studied in different ways by different researchers.
According to Hans Selye, an organism responds to external threats with set
physiological patterns of reaction (as cited in Taylor, 2003). Selye further posits
that after repeated stimulation, the system naturally becomes worn and the
resources exhausted, laying the groundwork for disease. Selye’s theory continues
to inform research falling under the disease model of stress, which is most often
the utilized in medical research (Taylor, 2003). The study of stress has often been
undertaken from a physiological or neuropsychological point of view. Taylor et.
al (2004) point out that stressful experiences can be noted as areas in the
amygdala are activated whenever there is something new or unexpected in the
environment, particularly when there are signs of danger.
Matheny and Ashby (2005) point out that stress was originally a physics
term referring to the pressure applied to materials to investigate their resilience,
and when the pressure exceeded the tolerance of the material, its molecules were
unable to spring back and maintain the integrity of the material. They further
illustrate that when used in relation to the human condition it is suggested that
excessive environmental stressors may challenge the homeostatic capacity of the
organism to maintain physical and psychological balance. Stress, as it is currently
used, is an umbrella term including stressors, the stress response, and stress
symptoms (Matheny & Ashby, 2005).
12
Stress and Coping
Stressors have been defined as events and/or conditions that are external to
the individual which place demands upon the individual’s resources (Brunswick,
Lewis, & Messeri, 1992). Lazarus and Folkman (1987) conceptualized stress as
“daily hassles” which they describe as uncontrollable aspects of everyday life
which tend to evoke irritation in individuals; an example is traffic on the way
home from work. It has also been operationalized by Holmes and Rahe (1967) as
life events (as cited in Taylor, 2003). Holmes and Rahe defined stressful life
events as those which cause high levels of emotional distress. Some examples
they provide are death of a loved one, divorce, and moving. Lazarus and
Folkman (1987) found that daily hassles are better predictors of current and
subsequent psychological symptoms than life events. They argue that this is
because ordinary stressful experiences of daily living, inclusive of those which are
the products of life events and those which arise out of other merely adventitious
encounters contribute to a person’s experience of stress. Furthermore, research
has shown that one’s interpretation of the difficult experience is what determines
how stressful it is on that individual. Appraisal is the construct which captures
the idea of perceived stress. It concerns the implications of the event (stressor)
for one’s personal well-being. In other words “What does this mean for me
personally?” (Lazarus & Folkman, 1987).
Herrington et al (2005) support Lazarus and Folkman’s position and argue
that the prevailing stress model is a transaction model that views stress as
resulting from an imbalance between perceived demands and perceived resources.
It has also become widely accepted that the impact of stressful experiences is to
13
Stress and Coping
some degree determined by one’s perception of its demand upon their coping
resources (Cohen, Kamarck & Mermelstein, 1983). The extent to which a
harmful or potentially harmful encounter between the person and the environment
is stressful depends on the meaning or significance of that encounter, which in
turn is based on the personal agendas and coping resources the person brings to
the situation (Gruen, Lazarus & Folkman, 1988).
The measurement of stress has also been an area which has sparked much
debate. However, as perceived stress is the focus of the present study, an
instrument which measures individuals’ perception of stress rather than actual
exposure to stressful experiences has been selected for use in data collection. The
Perceived Stress Scale developed by Cohen, Kamarck and Mermelstein (1983)
was incorporated into the Stress and Coping Style Questionnaire used in this
study. The authors discuss the benefit of using objective measures of stress which
focus on elements of actual external factors and ask respondents to state whether
they have experienced any of the stated events. An example would be living in an
extremely noisy environment and having respondents rate how many nights per
week they were exposed to the noise. On the other hand, Cohen, Kamarck and
Mermelstein (1983) put forward the superiority of measures which take into
consideration the reality that individuals “actively interact with their environment,
appraising potentially challenging or threatening events in the light of available
coping resources” (p.386). The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was designed to
measure the degree to which situations in one’s life are appraised as stressful.
This made it an appropriate instrument to suit the objectives of this study. The
14
Stress and Coping
psychometric properties of the PSS will be discussed in further detail in the
methodology section of this research report.
Coping
Dressler (1991) defines coping as cognitive and behavioral attempts to
alter events or circumstances that are threatening (as cited in Dyson & Renk,
2006). Matheny and Ashby (2005) have delineated the concept as coping
resources, coping styles, and coping behaviors. Herrington et. al (2005) define
coping as those personal characteristics and possessions drawn upon when
managing stressful events. For the purposes of this study, coping will be
discussed primarily as it relates to coping mechanisms. Lazarus and Folkman’s
transactional stress coping model provide the conceptual framework for much of
the research in this area. The current usage of the term coping mechanism is best
summarized in DeLongis and Holtzman’s (2005) work. They define coping as
adaptively changing cognitive and behavioral efforts to manage psychological
stress. However, it must be noted here that the discussion of coping mechanisms
incorporates the understanding that individuals present with both internal and
external coping resources, both of which are subsumed within the concept of
coping mechanisms. The dynamic interaction between the demands placed upon
the individual by the experience appraised as stressful and the responses
manufactured in an effort to either reduce the distress or solve the problem is at
the crux of the current study.
Sutton and Lachman (1996) postulate that the study of coping is rooted in
individual differences in reaction to stress, with the assumption that how
15
Stress and Coping
individuals cope is largely a function of personality characteristics, which result in
global coping styles. They argue that the literature shows that stress and coping
processes are widely understood to be affected by both personality and
environmental factors. Some studies have demonstrated that personality traits
such as neuroticism and hardiness affect both the individual’s appraisal of the
stressful experience and the use of coping strategies or mechanisms (Bolger,
1990; Florian, Mikulincer & Taubman, 1995 as cited in Sutton and Lachman,
1996). Measuring personality traits and extensive environmental factors are
beyond the scope of this research. However, some environmental factors were
examined, namely school, home, and relationship. Struthers, Perry and Menec
(2000) argue that academic stress poses a significant challenge for students and
when appraised negatively, can have adverse effects on students’ motivation and
performance.
Evidently, several models for understanding the relationship between
stress and coping have been postulated. However, Lazarus and Folkman’s (1987)
transactional stress and coping model serve as the theoretical framework for the
present study. They argue that adaptation to a stressor is influenced by the coping
processes in which people engage following that stressor (Lazarus & Folkman,
1984 as cited in Park, 2005). Park (2005) explicates Lazarus and Folkman’s
theory in a forthright manner:
This model focuses on cognitive appraisals of the situation and the coping strategies that follow from this appraisal. Cognitive appraisal involves making initial attributions about why the event occurred; determining the extent to which the event is threatening, controllable, and predictable (primary appraisal); and deciding
16
Primary AppraisalIs the situation controllable,
challenging, irrelevant?
Stress and Coping
what can be done (secondary appraisal). These appraisals, in turn, influence the coping efforts put forth by the individual.
Lazarus and Folkman’s transactional stress and coping model is illustrated
diagrammatically in figure 2.1.
17
Stressful experience
Coping Efforts
Solution Focused: Directed at changing the problemEmotion Focused: Directed at adjusting emotional distress
Stress and Coping
Secondary Appraisal
What are the resources available to cope with the situation?
18
Stress and Coping
Figure 2.1 Folkman and Lazarus’ Transactional Stress and Coping Model
According to Lazarus and Folkman’s theory, the coping process begins
with the individual’s perception of the stressful situation. A judgment must be
made about the severity of the threat to the individual’s sense of equilibrium.
That judgment is made within the context of the individual’s abilities to address
the situation. And ultimately, these cognitive evaluations impact upon the coping
mechanisms engaged in by the individual to address the stressful experience.
Some coping researchers distinguish between problem-focused coping strategies
(attempts to directly change the problem) and emotion-focused coping strategies
(attempts to regulate the distress) (Park, 2005). Lazarus and Folkman (1987)
describe these two functions of coping as: (1) to change the actual terms of the
troubled person-environment relationship - problem-focused coping; (2) to
regulate emotional distress, categorized as emotion-focused or cognitive coping.
Other researchers have categorized coping styles as adaptive or maladaptive.
DeLongis and Holtzman (2005) argue that there is a lack of consistency across
studies regarding which coping strategies are adaptive and maladaptive for
dealing with stressful events. The reasons they provide include methodological
19
Stress and Coping
differences across studies and lack of fit between methods and conceptual models
of coping.
Various research findings indicate that some types of emotion-focused
coping, particularly talking with others about the stressful experience, are helpful
in coping (Nolen-Hoeksema & Larson, 1999 as cited in Park, 2005). On the other
hand, other emotion-focused strategies, such as avoidance, tend to be related to
continued distress, while problem-focused coping tends to be more consistently
related to better adjustment outcomes (Aldwin, in press as cited in Park, 2005).
These findings would seem to support DeLongis and Holtzman’s view that the
findings are sometimes contradictory.
Dispositional and Situational Coping.
Some researchers discuss coping in terms of dispositional versus
situational coping. Sasaki and Yamasaki (2002) delineate dispositional coping as
a trait approach to coping – a long term, personality based approach to dealing
with stress. They outline situational coping as a state or transient method of
coping the individual may engage in depending on the situation. They argue that
dispositional coping can impact upon situational coping but that this is not always
the case. Sasaki and Yamasaki (2002) also found that an increase in dispositional
emotion expression, cognitive reinterpretation, and problem solving predicts
reductions in mental distress. These findings challenge the notion that emotion-
focused coping consistently leads to continued emotional distress or fewer
measured adjustment outcomes than problem-focused coping.
20
Stress and Coping
Gender and Coping.
As it relates to gender differences in coping, some studies suggest that
men are more likely to use problem-focused coping strategies and women are
more likely to use emotion-focused strategies (La France & Banaji, 1992; Larson
& Pleck, 1998 as cited in Matheny, Ashby & Cupp, 2005). Matheny, Ashby and
Cupp (2005) argue that it is unclear whether women actually experience
emotional reactions more frequently than men but that they seem to express their
emotions more frequently and more intensely (Grossman & Wood, 1993; Brody
& Hall, 1993; Sprecher & Sedikides, 1993; Fujita, Diener, & Sandvik, 1991 as
cited in Matheny, Ashby & Cupp, 2005). The authors further postulate that such
gender differences likely result from the combined effects of biology, prenatal and
perinatal factors, culture, and family influences. In a meta-analytic review of 50
studies of sex differences in coping, Tamres et al. (2002) found women to be
significantly more likely than men to use social support, to ruminate longer over
stressors, and to engage in positive self-talk (cited in Matheny, Ashby & Cupp,
2005). Taylor, Klein, Lewis, Gruenewald, Gurung, and Updegraff (2000)
speculated that the greater use of social support by women has a biological
basis (cited in Matheny, Ashby & Cupp, 2005). When women are faced with a
threat they are more likely to engage in a "tend-and-befriend" response while men
are more likely to engage in a "fight-or-flight" response. The greater likelihood of
a woman's making a tend-or-befriend response may be attributed to the larger
production of the bonding hormone, oxytocin (Taylor, Dickerson, & Klein, 2001).
However, the differential reinforcement of the use of social support by one's
21
Stress and Coping
reference group may account for its greater use by women. A study among
southern African Americans revealed that active coping was a buffer for the
effects of stress for black women. Whereas for black men, it exacerbated the
effects of stress (Dressier, 1985 as cited in Matheny, Ashby, & Cupp, 2005).
Evidently, gender differences in coping have been well established in the
literature.
Adaptive and Maladaptive Coping.
Gan, Shang and Zhang (2007) provide a different perspective on the issue
of adaptive and maladaptive coping styles. They termed their conceptual
framework the situation-strategy fit. This is described as the goodness of fit
between appraisal of control and coping strategies. When situations are perceived
as controllable, and problem-focused strategies are utilized, this may be referred
to as situation strategy fit. Likewise, when a situation is perceived as
uncontrollable and emotion-focused strategies are used, this may also be seen as
situation-strategy fit. Gan, Shang and Zhang (2007) suggest that emotion-focused
coping methods may be the most suitable in cases where the situation is appraised
as uncontrollable. This is logical as if there is nothing or very little the individual
can do to adjust the situation, it would be advisable to adjust one’s response to it
and also to seek ways of altering the emotions related to the stressful situation.
On the other hand, applying emotion-focused coping methods to situations over
which the individual has greater levels of control may produce fewer results than
applying solution focused methods. However, it may be argued that emotion-
focused methods may be applied first to alter the individual’s emotional response,
22
Stress and Coping
allowing for a more rational approach to the solution-focused methods. The use
of mood-altering substances as a coping mechanism is arguably one such
emotion-focused method which positively alters the emotional state of the
individual and allows for greater focus when using problem-focused methods.
This hypothesis will be discussed in greater detail in the next section.
Substance Use - An Emotion-Focused Coping Mechanism
As previously discussed, emotion-focused coping mechanisms are those
which seek to reduce the emotional distress experienced as a result of the dynamic
interplay of internal and external phenomena during experiences perceived as
stressful. Carver (1997) includes substance use in the category of emotion-
focused coping mechanisms. He also includes the use of substances on the Brief
COPE. Cannabis sativa, cigarettes, and alcohol (CCA) will be the substances
under examination in this study. This decision was based upon prevalence data
for Jamaica which indicates that these are the dominant drugs of choice (Abel,
2003).
Cannabis.
The Cannabis plant has three varieties: cannabis sativa, cannabis indica,
and cannabis ruredalis (Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs,
2002). The most common form of the substance is cannabis sativa which
produces the substance that is smoked. Cannabis sativa is a psychoactive
substance also known as marijuana, pot, weed, ganja, among other names. It is
classified as a psychoactive substance because of its effects on the central and
periphery nervous systems. The use of Cannabis Sativa has sparked much
23
Stress and Coping
international debate. Some countries have passed laws allowing the substance to
be used therapeutically, others have passed laws allowing its use for any reason,
while others still have outlawed use of the psychoactive substance. Nations such
as the United States and Jamaica continue to have laws that make cannabis use
illegal. This may be contrasted with the prevailing high illegal use rates in these
two countries (Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs, 2002; Abel,
2003). On the other hand, nations such as Spain allow free personal use of the
substance and report relatively low usage rates.
One of the reasons that cannabis use remains controversial is the debate
over whether it is to be considered a gateway drug. Gateway drugs, which consist
of cannabis, alcohol, and tobacco, are those which are thought to lead to the use of
other illicit substances or hard drugs. The Canadian Senate Special Committee on
Illegal Drugs (2002) operationalized the term as the “theory suggesting a
sequential pattern in involvement in drug use from nicotine to alcohol, to cannabis
and then to ‘hard’ drugs”. Furthermore, in regard to cannabis, they offered that the
theory rests on a statistical association between the use of hard drugs and the fact
that these users have generally used cannabis as their first illicit drug. Fergusson
and Horwood (2000) present the arguments for and against Cannabis Sativa being
described as a gateway drug. In the argument supporting this description, it is
held that cannabis is a "gateway" drug whose usage encourages other forms of
more serious illicit drug use (Kandel & Faust, 1975 as cited in Fergusson &
Horwood, 2000). The stage theory of substance use holds that the development of
substance use and abuse follows a generally lawful progression in which the
24
Stress and Coping
individual makes transitions from using legitimate drugs including alcohol and
tobacco to various forms of illicit drug use (MacCoun, 1998 as cited in Fergusson
& Horwood, 2000). The authors outline the assumptions of the stage theory of
substance use and abuse as follows:
(a) those using illicit drugs will invariably have used licit drugs but (b) not all of those using licit drugs will move to using illicit drugs. In this sequence, the use of cannabis can be seen as the first step in a process in which individuals make a transition to the use of illicit drugs. It has been suggested that this transition, in turn, increases the likelihood that cannabis users will progress to taking other illicit, and potentially more harmful, drugs (Fergusson & Horwood, 2000, p.506).
Challengers of stage theory argue that the overlap between users of more
harmful drugs and those who use cannabis may be explained by other common
factors such as similar life choices and other personality or environmental factors
(Huba, Wingard & Bentler, 1981; Hays et al, 1987 as cited in Fergusson &
Horwood, 2000). Hence, the argument against the categorization of cannabis as a
gateway drug lies in the fact that there are other predisposing factors which
predict hard drug usage and studies have not yet conclusively shown that cannabis
is the cause of the transition.
Cannabis Sativa is a well known substance in the Jamaican context. It is
expected that a large number of the sample in this study, perhaps as much as 15%,
will report using this substance. 1997 prevalence data indicates that 27 per cent
of the secondary school population had used cannabis at some point in their lives
(Abel, 2003). However, the use of this substance remains an issue of national
debate. This is the case as findings continue to emerge which support both the
25
Stress and Coping
position that cannabis use has negative effects and that there are some beneficial
effects to its use, often times, depending on the mode of delivery. As it relates to
smoking the substance, there have been findings which suggest an association
between smoking cannabis and increased violent behaviour (Howard & Menkes,
2007). Wendel Abel (2003), then consultant psychiatrist at the University of the
West Indies, reported that studies have shown that cannabis use is associated with
short term memory impairment and psychomotor retardation and may affect the
performance of persons carrying out demanding jobs such as pilots and operators
of heavy vehicles. He further reported that long term use of cannabis via
inhalation increases the risk of lung diseases such as chronic bronchitis and lung
cancer.
On the other side of this argument are those who contend that cannabis use
has mostly beneficial outcomes. In one study, Coomber, Oliver and Morris
(2003) reported that persons using cannabis for its therapeutic properties
perceived it to be highly effective in treating their symptoms, in complementing
existing medication, and in producing fewer unwanted effects of their medication.
This is a crucial factor in nations determining whether to legalize personal use of
the substance. In Canada, this was one of the reasons for the Special Committee
on Illegal Drugs making the recommendation for the Government to amend the
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to create a criminal exemption scheme,
under which the production and sale of cannabis would be licensed (2002).
Another popular argument for legalizing the use of Cannabis in Jamaica is
for religious purposes. Rastafarians have long lobbied for the legalization of
26
Stress and Coping
cannabis for use in their religious rituals. Nevertheless, the use of cannabis in
Jamaica, even for therapeutic consumption remains illegal.
Cigarettes.
The World Health Organization describes Tobacco use (including
smoking) as being causally linked to a number of chronic diseases including
several cancers, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and
cardiovascular diseases. On a global level, the organization reports that a recent
study suggests that 4.83 million deaths were attributable to smoking in 2000
(Ezzati and Lopez, 2004 as cited in WHO Global Infobase). The organization
further reports that over half of these (2.69 million deaths) were among people
aged 30 to 69 years, resulting in a large number of premature deaths. As it relates
to comparisons between developing and developed countries, there were equal
numbers of deaths due to tobacco. However, findings revealed that there were
greater numbers of diseases associated with smoking in developing countries.
The organization attributes this to the fact that smoking related deaths occur at
younger ages in developing countries, accounting for a larger loss of life from
premature mortality in developing countries relative to developed countries.
Prevalence data for Jamaica revealed that in 2006, 37% of 13-15 year old males
and females from a sample of 1854 rural and urban students had smoked a
cigarette at some time in their lives. The health concerns associated with cigarette
use for smokers and those inhaling the second hand smoke have been well
documented. As a result, smoking cigarettes as a coping mechanism for stress
among UWI Mona students has more scientific support for concern than does the
27
Stress and Coping
use of cannabis. The prevalence of smoking as a coping mechanism in the
present sample is expected to be higher than that of cannabis use, at perhaps 20%.
Alcohol.
Alcohol use has also had a long and colourful history globally. Nations
have come full circle from having alcohol consumption outlawed to allowing its
use, to regulating its use, and in some instances, discouraging its use. The
Jamaican experience with alcohol has been closely linked to the nation’s
experience with slavery and the slave trade, as alcohol was one of the primary
derivatives from the sugar cane industry. Prevalence data from Professor
Kolawole Soyibo’s study (1995) indicates that 54.4 % of 16-17 year olds in the
sample of 1,345 rural and urban Jamaican youths had consumed alcohol in their
lifetime (WHO).
The use of CCAs is being classified as an emotion-focused way of coping
as it does not directly address the problematic situation. It is arguable that CCA
use indirectly addresses the situation as the reduction of tension may allow the
individual the mental composure to engage in problem solving. However, a more
suitable example of a mixed coping approach, incorporating aspects of both
emotion-focused and problem-focused coping is the use of social support as
presented by Gencoz, Gencoz, and Bozo (2006). Their findings were as follows:
Social support was viewed as a mixed coping style since it might encompass different types of resources such as emotional support - being convinced that one is loved and cared for, tangible support - attaining the required instrument for the solution of the problem, and informational support - attaining the required information for the solution of the problem. Thus, this type of coping may include features of both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping.
28
Stress and Coping
Some research indicates that coping styles vary between cultures
identified as being collectivistic and those identified as being individualistic (Gan,
Shang, & Zhang, 2007; Gencoz, Gencoz, & Bozo, 2006). Jamaica may be
considered a nation in transition from a more collectivistic way of being among
individuals and groups to a more individualistic way of being among members of
the society. Gencoz, Gencoz, and Bozo (2006) propose that Turkey is one such
nation, and as such may engage in more social support seeking methods of
coping, and examine this style as separate from emotion-focused and problem-
focused. As aforementioned, they outline how social-support may or may not
incorporate aspects of both emotion and problem focused approaches to coping.
Like Turkey, Jamaica is a developing nation experiencing the transition into
higher levels of traditionally Western individualism. However, this author
postulates that rather than pursuing social support coping styles, individuals may
tend towards substance use as a coping mechanism to deal with increasing levels
of stress in their increasingly complicated and socially distant lifestyles. This
pattern may obtain for UWI students in the Jamaican context, who though
somewhat insulated from the society, are nevertheless impacted upon by the
prevailing cultural norms.
The underlying implication of the current research is that higher levels of
perceived stress will be linked to more frequent use of emotion-focused coping
styles. With substance use being a subset of emotion-focused coping
mechanisms, this style is expected to have a higher frequency among those
29
Stress and Coping
scoring higher levels of perceived stress. It is arguable that individuals who
appraise various situations negatively and experience them as extremely stressful
and perhaps even uncontrollable are more likely to engage in distress-reducing
emotion-focused coping mechanisms. Gan, Shang and Zhang (2007) posit that
situations perceived as uncontrollable are well dealt with by engaging in emotion-
focused coping styles. It is the postulation of this researcher that substance use as
one such emotion focused coping mechanism will be engaged in by persons
experiencing higher levels of stress perceived as uncontrollable.
Studies have shown that individuals consistently report feeling a reduction
in tension after the use of alcohol (O’Hare & Sherrer, 1997). It is this
researcher’s position that this is an emotion-focused means of coping. It is the
individual’s attempt to reduce the distress (s)he is experiencing as a result of a
stressful event or perception of something as stressful.
Studies demonstrate that the onset of tobacco and alcohol use occurs
primarily in early adolescence (Douglas, 2000). One may therefore question the
importance of conducting a study among a young adult population, since the
likelihood of them already beginning substance use is increased. The necessity
rests in the increased chance of first use or increased use under high levels of
perceived stress (Brady & Sonne, 1999).
Students at the Mona Campus of the UWI
The Mona Campus of the University of the West Indies has been
consistently registering a significantly higher proportion of female relative to
male students. The current gender distribution of the total student body is
30
Stress and Coping
approximately 71% female to 29% male. Chart 1.1 illustrates the gender
distribution trends in the university over the past three years.
Figure 1.1 Gender Distribution at the University of the West Indies, Mona Campus (Data Source: http://www.mona.uwi.edu/opair/profile/student-demographics.pdf)
Jamaicans constitute the majority of the student body with 91% of the
student body being citizens of Jamaica. 52% of the student population is under 24
years old; 27% are between 25 and 34; and 8% are above 45 years. 72% of the
student population currently resides off campus. 2,364 students are presently
enrolled in the Faculty of Social Sciences. This constitutes 36.4% of total
enrollment. The ratio of students enrolled in the Faculties is Social Sciences (36):
Humanities and Education (26): Medical Sciences (18): Pure and Applied
Sciences (19): Law (1). Faculty enrollment according to gender is displayed in
Table 1.1.
31
Stress and Coping
Table 1.1 Population Distribution at the University of the West Indies, Mona
Campus
Faculty Males Females Total
Humanities and Education 351 1330 1681
Law 7 39 46
Medical Sciences 268 870 1138
Pure and Applied Sciences 545 721 1266
Social Sciences 590 1774 2364
Total 1761 4734 6495
The impact of stress is a reality for university students. There are also
unique aspects of that status which bring additional challenges to the student.
However, as previously noted, the degree to which one is affected is determined
more by their perception or appraisal of the stressor than the actual objective
reality of the experience. Abouserie (1994) suggests that approximately one in
ten students may need professional support to reduce their levels of stress (as
cited in Robotham & Julian, 2006). Though these statistics are based on U.S.
populations, it may be argued that the situation at Mona may be similar, since
many of the experiences of University students are similar. However, research is
32
Stress and Coping
necessary to support such a postulate as there are also a multitude of differences
between students at the UWI and students in the U.S.A.
Coping mechanisms of students may be similar to those in the general
population. It is of interest to note, however, that university students have high
expectations of substances such as alcohol to function as agents of relaxation and
tension reduction (Rauch & Bryant, 2000). This is an important relationship to
the study of coping mechanisms employed by university students. Research has
shown that university campus life provides students many opportunities for
growth, however, it is also often associated with serious psychological distress
(Aspinwall & Taylor,1992; Leong, Bonz, & Zachar, 1997 as cited in Gan, Shang
& Zhang, 2007). In attempts to help students cope with this stress, preventive
programs have been administered to university students in both Western and
Eastern countries (e.g., Fontana, Hyra, Godfrey, & Cermak, 1999; Hirokawa,
Yagi, & Miyata, 2002; Nicholson, Belcastro, & Duncan, 1989 as cited in Gan,
Shang & Zhang, 2007). The main component of these preventive programs has
been cognitive-behavioral stress management training, particularly relaxation
training and coping skills training. The authors argue that understanding the
process by which university students experience and cope with psychological
distress is crucial for the success of these programs. This will also be the case at
the University of the West Indies, making the current research a beginning step in
the process of understanding coping among its students.
Wallenstein et. al (2007) found that 80.7% of the students surveyed on
college campuses in the U.S.A. had consumed alcohol at some time in the past
33
Stress and Coping
year. Furthermore, more than 44% reported having at least one heavy-drinking
episode (5 or more drinks in a single session for men, 4 or more drinks per session
for women). Although these statistics relate to what obtains in the U.S.A., the
paucity of literature available in this area locally forces reliance upon such data.
However, prevalence data for Jamaican 13th graders in 1997 suggests 28% of that
segment of the population had consumed alcohol in the past 30 days.
Studies of substance use behaviours might be considered more robust if
individual personality factors are considered. One important factor is locus of
control. Gan, Shang and Zhang (2007) describe Rotter’s locus of control concept
as one of the most important personality variables affecting mental health. The
perceived stress scale on the Stress and Coping Style Questionnaire examines the
level of control the individual feels (s)he has over events in his or her life. Hence,
locus of control as it relates to perception of stress is an element which will be
incorporated in this study.
The literature on stress and coping is vast. However, the primary areas of
focus of this research include the relationship between perceived stress and
coping styles, particularly substance use as a coping mechanism, the impact of
substance expectation on the use of substances as a coping mechanism, and the
effect of variables such as controllability of experienced stress on perceived stress
scores. These variables will all be examined by factors such as gender, faculty
and ethnicity.
34
Stress and Coping
Chapter 3 - Methodology
The Perceived Stress and Coping study employs quantitative research
methodology to test the following hypotheses:
1. There will be a positive relationship between the level of perceived stress
and the use of substances as a coping technique.
2. The likelihood of the use of substances as a coping technique will increase
if the substance is considered to have a positive effect.
This section will describe the sample distribution and sample selection. The
psychometric properties of the Stress and Coping Style Questionnaire as well as
the two scales used in its construction, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the
Brief COPE, will be discussed. In addition, data collection procedures and
analysis will be outlined. Figure 3.1 illustrates the research design and informs
the discussion which follows.
35
Stress and Coping
Figure 3.1 Research Design Diagram
36
(B)Dependent Variable: Substance Use as a Coping Technique
Hypotheses1. There will be a positive relationship between the level of perceived stress and the use of
substances as a coping technique.2. The likelihood of the use of substances as a coping technique will increase if the
substance is perceived to have a positive effect.
Quantitative Data Analysis: SPSS, Frequency Distributions, Pearson’s r, ANOVA
(E)Moderator Variable:
Expectation of Substance Impact
(A)Independent Variable:
Perceived Stress
Data Presentation:Tables, Bar Charts, Histograms, and Frequency Distribution Graphs.
Stress and Coping
Sample
The sample was taken from the population of students at the Mona
Campus of the University of the West Indies. The stated hypotheses were
looked at by gender, faculty, and residential status, using the respective
ratios for each category. The anticipated strength of the association is a
correlational coefficient (r = .35) with 90% power, (alpha = .05). To
demonstrate statistical significance amongst the identified subgroups a
minimum sample size of 240 respondents was required. 40 extra
respondents were included to allow for discards. The sample size
calculating software SamplePower v.2.0 was used (developed by SPSS
inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Stratified Random sampling was used to
administer the instrument. Table 3.1 shows the distribution of the sample
according to the stated categories.
Table 3.1 Sample Distribution
Humanities &
educationLaw
Medical
sciences
Pure &
applied
Social
sciences
Gender M F M F M F M F M F
On Campus 4 16 0 1 9 10 7 8 8 21
Off Campus 11 40 1 1 3 26 18 22 20 54
Gender
Total 15 56 1 2 12 36
25 30 28 75
Faculty Total 71 3 48 55 103
Total n = 280
37
Stress and Coping
Research Design
Survey methodology was used to collect the data on the association
between perceived stress and coping in the sample. It is a correlational study
which seeks to establish the association between the stated variables on the Mona
campus of the University of the West Indies. Additionally, the effect of a
moderator variable, expectation of substance impact will be analyzed. Baron and
Kenny (1986) describe a moderator variable as a qualitative (e.g. sex, race, class)
or quantitative … variable that affects the direction and/ or strength of a relation
between an independent or predictor variable and a dependent or criterion
variable… a basic moderator effect can be represented as an interaction between a
focal independent variable and a factor (the moderator) that specifies the
appropriate conditions for its operation…Moderator variables are typically
introduced when there is an unexpectedly weak or inconsistent relationship
between a predictor and a criterion (cited in Holmbeck, 1997). The moderator’s
effect was examined by including an item on the questionnaire which determines
the expectations respondents have of various substances.
Instrumentation
The questionnaire is a 30 item instrument consisting of a
demographic section, two pre-constructed scales, and items constructed by the
researcher. The perceived stress scale constructed by, Cohen, Kamarck, and
Mermelstein (1983) consists of 10 items. Internal reliability of r = .86 was
achieved on a sample of University of Oregon students. Test-re-test reliability for
this scale was also found to be r = .85 (Cohen, Kamarck & Mermelstein, 1983).
38
Stress and Coping
The psychometric properties of the 14-item PSS were determined from data
collected from three samples, two groups of college students, and one group of
respondents in a community smoking-cessation program. Coefficient alpha
reliability for the PSS was .84, .85, and .86 in each of the three samples.
Therefore it may be said that the PSS has a reasonably high level of internal
reliability. According to George and Mallory (2003) Cronbach’s alpha may be
interpreted as follows “alpha > .90 – excellent; alpha > .80 – good; alpha > .70 –
acceptable; alpha > .60 – questionable; alpha > .50 – poor; alpha < .50
unacceptable”.
The shortened COPE was adapted from Charles Carver’s Brief COPE
(1997) for use in this study. The Brief COPE includes 28 items, which measure
“14 conceptually differentiable coping reactions” (Carver, 1997). However, after
receiving feedback from respondents in the piloting of the Stress and Coping Style
Questionnaire the researcher shortened the Brief COPE and included only one of
the two items on each of the fourteen scales. Exception was made for the scale
related to substance use to allow for scale analysis with the perceived stress scale
score. As a result, reliability can only be calculated for the Substance Use scale
of the Brief COPE. Reliability for this scale is alpha = 0.882, which is good
reliability.
The instrument, which is a compilation of the two previously mentioned
scales, demographic items and the 6 items constructed by the researcher was
piloted at the University of the West Indies engaging 28 students (10 % of the
sample size). This led to the adaptation of the instrument. As mentioned the Brief
39
Stress and Coping
COPE was shortened to allow for faster completion of the instrument. A copy of
the instrument is provided in Appendix A.
Procedures for Collecting Data
Lecturers of core courses in each faculty were asked to allow the
researcher to address students after class was dismissed to solicit their
participation. Students who were willing to participate completed the
instrument in approximately 10 minutes. The places, courses and dates on
which data were collected are presented in Table 2.2 Sample Selection.
The questionnaire was distributed by the researcher to all students in the
class who were willing to participate and collected as persons indicated
that they were finished.
Table 3.2 Sample Selection
Faculty Course/ LocationNumber of
students
Humanities & Education
PH10A Introduction to Logic
36
PH10B Ethics and Applied Ethics
35
Law Outside the Faculty of Law main entrance
3
Pure & Applied Sciences
M08B Pre-Calculus 55
Social Sciences
EC 16A Introductory Statistics
46
GT23F Issues in Contemporary Politics
37
SW 24D Drug and Society
20
Medical Sciences Medical Library
48
Total 280
40
Stress and Coping
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables of interest and
reported. Tests that were run are Chi-Square test of independence; Spearman’s
correlation was conducted to analyze the association between perceived stress and
coping style. Cronbach’s alpha was used to analyze the reliability of the
Perceived Stress Scale on the Stress and Coping Style Questionnaire. Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine whether a significant difference exists
between students enrolled in the various faculties. ANOVA was also used to
determine the difference between groups of persons expecting no effect from the
use of CCAs, beneficial effect, harmful effect, and mixed effects in actual
reporting of CCA use as a coping mechanism.
41
Stress and Coping
Chapter 4 - Results
The findings of this study are indicative of patterns and trends among
students of the Mona campus of the University of the West Indies. 268 was the
final number of respondents included in the study after removing incomplete
questionnaires. The sample distribution by gender was not identical to the
stratification in the population. On the Mona campus, 71% of students are female
and 29% are male. In the sample, 69.8% of respondents were female and 30.2%
were male. There was a .8% difference from what was suggested by the
population. Overall, the sample was representative of the UWI Mona population
as it relates to gender. The breakdown is depicted in Figure 4.1.
42
Stress and Coping
Figure 4.1 Gender Distribution
Stratified random sampling methodology was used to ensure that the
sample distribution represented the population of the University of the West
Indies Mona campus according to Faculty. As a result, the actual sample
distribution is representative of the enrollment levels across Faculties on the
campus. The distribution in the sample according to Faculty is represented in
Figure 4.2.
Male - 30.2%
Female - 69.8%
43
Stress and Coping
Figure 4.2 Sample Distribution by Faculty
Respondents were asked to provide the researcher with their age range.
Most of the respondents, 53.7%, fell between 18 and 21 years. One subject
reported being under 18 and 11.2% of respondents were above age 30. The age
distribution in the sample is not representative of the University’s population as
only 50% of undergraduate students on the Mona Campus are under 25 years of
Humanities & Education
Law Medical Sciences
Pure & Applied Sciences
Social Sciences
Faculty
0 %
10 %
20%
30%
40%
Percent
44
Stress and Coping
age. Over 80% of the respondents in the sample were below 25 years. Age
distribution of the respondents is illustrated in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 Age Range
Age range Frequency Percent
Under 18 1 .4
18-21 144 53.7
22-25 75 28.0
26-29 18 6.7
30 & up 30 11.2
Total 268 100.0 ________________________________________________
Of the 268 respondents, 85.4% had full-time enrollment status, with the remaining
14.6% being part-time students. As it relates to residency status, 77.2% of
participants resided on-campus and the remaining 22.8% resided off-campus.
Approximately 30% of respondents were affiliated with Taylor Hall, 17.9% with
Preston Hall, 17.2% with Rex Nettleford Hall, 15.7% with Irvine Hall, 8.6% with
Mary Seacole Hall, and 6.3% with Chancellor Hall. Ten respondents did not
provide information on their Hall of attachment.
Persons describing themselves as Black constituted the greater portion of the
sample totaling 84.7% of respondents. Three percent of respondents were of
Indian descent. Respondents of mixed descent accounted for 11.9% of the
sample. One participant was of Caucasian descent. Jamaicans made up 92.5% of
the sample. The second largest group consisted of Trinidadians with 1.9%. Other
45
Stress and Coping
countries represented were Antigua, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin
Islands, Guyana, Monsterrat, St.Lucia, St. Vincent, and the United Kingdom.
Perceived Stress Levels Among Respondents
The Perceived Stress Scale of the Stress and Coping Style Questionnaire
measures the level of stress individuals perceive themselves as experiencing over
the past 30 days. The lowest possible score on the scale is 0 and the highest
possible score is 40. The closer an individual’s score is to 40, the higher their
level of perceived stress. The opposite also holds true, that is, the closer the score
is to 0, the lower is the individual’s level of perceived stress. The median point,
20, can be interpreted as showing that the individual is experiencing moderate
levels of stress. The five point Likert-type scale was used to calculate
respondents’ scores. PSS scores were derived by summing the responses to the
ten items on the scale.
The distribution of scores on the PSS among the entire sample fell along
the normal curve, with a mean PSS score of 20.9 and standard deviation of 6.42.
This sample mean is comparable to that of the normative sample of 332 students
from the University of Oregon whose average PSS Score was 23.18. There were
a few outliers in the present sample. Nevertheless, most scores clustered around
the mean. The normal distribution of the PSS score indicates that the
respondents in the sample were reporting moderate levels of stress. According to
George and Mallory (2003), good reliability is alpha > .80. By these standards,
internal reliability for the Perceived Stress Scale was good as evidenced by
46
0 10 20 30 40
Perceived Stress Score
0
10
20
30
40
50
Frequency
Mean = 20.9
Std. Dev. = 6.418
N = 268
Stress and Coping
Cronbach’s alpha = 0.849. The distribution of the PSS in the sample is
highlighted in Figure 4.3.
Perceived Stress Score
% of Subjects
Figure 4.3 Perceived Stress Frequency Distribution
Perceived Stress and Gender.
Respondents reported that School Related stress was the most difficult
type of stress for them to cope with. This pattern was noted among both males
and females. However, females also reported more than one as being most
difficult. This is reflected in Table 4.2. In addition, females were twice as likely
as males to report relationship related stress as the most difficult for them to cope
with. The distribution of types of stress and how difficult each type is perceived,
according to gender, is outlined in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2 Stress Category Distribution by Gender
Gender School related stress Relationship related Home related
47
0 2 4 6Substance Use Coping Scale Score
Figure 4.4 Substance Use Coping Frequency
0
50
100
150
200
250
Frequency
Mean = 0.31
Std. Dev. = 0.989
N = 268
Stress and Coping
stress stress
Males 67.5% 15.0% 17.5%
Females 72.7% 30.5% 25.1%
Objective1. Frequency of Substance Use as a Coping Mechanism
One of the objectives of this study was to provide data on the frequency of
the use of substances as a coping mechanism for stress among students of the
University of the West Indies, Mona campus. The two item subscale related to
substance use coping was used to calculate substance use coping scores. On this
scale, 11.2% of respondents reported that they used alcohol, cigarettes or cannabis
to make themselves feel better when experiencing stress. This is reflected in
Figure 4.4.
No. of subjects
Substance Use Coping and Gender, Residential Status and Faculty.
Substance Use Coping Scale Scores indicate that there was no significant
difference in substance use coping behaviours between males and females. This
was demonstrated by the Chi-square test of significance, .273. Table 4.3
demonstrates the scores obtained by males and females in the study. There was
48
Stress and Coping
also no statistically significant difference between substance use coping scores by
residential status or faculty.
Table 4.3 Distribution of Substance Use Coping Scores by Gender
Gender Substance use coping scale scores
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Males 84.0% 4.9% 8.6% 1.2% 0% 0% 1.2%
Females 89.8%
.5% 5.3% 2.1% 0% .5% 1.6%
Hypothesis One
The first hypothesis of this study is that there will be a positive
relationship between the level of perceived stress and the use of substances as a
coping mechanism. In other words, as the level of perceived stress increases, so
should the use of substances as a coping mechanism. Calculation of Pearson’s r
coefficient indicated a positive correlation between levels of perceived stress and
substance use coping, r = 0.191; alpha=.01. However, the correlation is not
statistically significant. Furthermore, the relationship between the two variables
may be better described as curvilinear. This is depicted in Figure 4.5.
49
Stress and Coping
0 1 2 3 5 6
Substance Use Coping Scale
20
25
30
35
Mea
n P
erce
ived
Str
ess
Sco
re
Figure 4.5 Relationship between Perceived Stress and Substance Use Coping
Given this curvilinear nature of the association between the two variables, the null
hypothesis that there will be no positive relationship between levels of perceived
stress and substance use coping must be accepted.
Objective 2. The Substance Most Frequently Used as Coping Mechanism
Among respondents reporting the use of substances as a coping
mechanism, the majority reported alcohol as their drug of choice. The second
most frequently used substance was cannabis, followed by alcohol. Some
respondents reported that they did not use substances as a coping mechanism, but
50
Stress and Coping
went on to endorse alcohol as the substance they would use when feeling stressed.
This pattern led to higher frequencies being reported for the use of alcohol as a
coping mechanism for stress than those reported on the substance use coping
scale. This latter scale had combined the three substances (CCA) on the two
items. Table 4.4 depicts the frequency of the use of alcohol, cannabis, and
cigarettes in the sample.
Table 4.4 Frequency of CCA Use
Substance Alcohol Cigarettes Cannabis
Percentage of
sample reporting
substance use
21.6% 4.5% 4.1%
Objective3. Coping Styles Most Frequently Used by Students
The third objective of this research was to discover the coping style most
frequently used by students at the Mona Campus. The results indicate that
“planning” as titled by Cohen (1995) on the Brief COPE was the most frequently
used coping style with 38.1% of respondents reporting that they were “coming up
with a strategy about what to do” a lot of the time. The related concept of “active
coping”, also outlined by Cohen (1995) was the second most frequently used
coping mechanism, with 31.3% of students endorsing it as their most frequently
used approach to coping with stress. It must also be noted that there were no
statistically significant gender differences in the use of planning and active
51
Stress and Coping
coping. The least frequently used coping mechanism used by students was denial
with 3.9% of students reporting that they “have been saying this isn’t real” a lot of
the time.
Objective 4. Analysis of the Impact of Expectation of Substance Effect on the
Relationship between Level of Perceived Stress and Substance Use Coping
The fourth and final objective of this study was to analyze the
impact of expectations of the substances’ effect as a mediating factor between the
level of perceived stress and the use of substances as a coping mechanism.
Students’ expectations of the effect of the use of CCAs was linked to a
statistically significant amount of the variation in the level of substance use as a
coping mechanism, F (5, 262) = 6.688, p<0.001). Respondents expecting
substances to have harmful effects on them reported significantly lower use of
substances as a coping mechanism than those expecting the use of CCAs to have
either a beneficial or a mixed effect. Those expecting beneficial effects reported
significantly higher levels of substance use as a coping mechanism than those
with mixed expectations. The difference in the expectations of the use of
substances as a coping mechanism was greatest between those who expected
CCAs to have a harmful effect and those who expected CCAs to have beneficial
effects, with the former group having a statistically significantly higher score on
the substance use as a coping scale than the latter group. Figure 4.7 depicts the
distribution of mean substance use scores among the four groups.
HarmfulHarmful
52
Stress and Coping
Figure 4.6 Means Plot of Expectation of Substance Use and Substance
Use Coping Mean Scores
Hypothesis 2.
The statistically significant differences between the means of substance
use coping scale scores of respondents with different expectations of substances’
effect indicates a statistically significant relationship between those two variables.
Accordingly, the second hypothesis of this study that the likelihood of the use of
substances as a coping technique will increase if the substances are considered to
have positive effects was supported by this finding. The statistically significant
None Beneficial Harmful Mixed (Beneficial & Harmful)
What effect would you expect the use of CCA to have on you?
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Mean of substanceuse
Mean Sub.Use ScaleScore
53
Stress and Coping
relationship between the variables indicates that the null hypothesis must be
rejected.
Students’ Perceptions of Substances
Responses to the item enquiring about which substances are considered
addictive indicate that 33.7% of respondents are of the opinion that heroine is not
an addictive substance. Findings further indicate that 19.8% of respondents
reported that they did not consider crack/cocaine to be an addictive substance.
Approximately 70% of the respondents indicated that they think cigarettes are
addictive. As it relates to cannabis and alcohol, 67.5% of respondents and 71.6%
of respondents respectively indicated that these substances were addictive.
54
Stress and Coping
Chapter 5 - Discussion
The findings of the study indicate that there is an association between
perceived stress and coping, though it is a weak one. The findings also
demonstrate that there is a statistically significant relationship between the
expectation of the substance’s effect and the actual use of the substance as a
coping mechanism for stress which finds support in O’Hare and Sherrer’s study
(1997). These findings and other patterns identified in the data along with the
implications of these findings will be discussed in this section. Additionally,
limitations, recommendations, and suggestions for future research arising from
the findings will also be presented.
Objective1. Frequency of Substance Use as a Coping Mechanism
The first objective of this study was to provide data on the frequency of
the use of substances as a coping mechanism among UWI Mona students. As
reported, 11.2% of respondents reported that they engaged in the use of alcohol,
cigarettes or cannabis in efforts to cope with their experiences of stress. It is
significant to note that almost 90% of the respondents indicated that they did not
engage in the use of substances as a coping mechanism for stress. Findings
indicate that the levels of perceived stress among respondents were moderate,
with a mean stress score of 20.9. This indicates that students were reporting
levels of stress comparative to the students in the normative sample of University
of Oregon students. This may be construed as a positive indicator of the students’
emotional well-being as they were not reporting extreme levels of perceived
stress. It is arguable that the moderate levels of stress being experienced by
55
Stress and Coping
respondents accounted for the low use of substances as a coping mechanism.
However, that conclusion would be hasty since the relationship between
perceived stress and substance use coping was weak, r=0.191.
The hypothesis that higher levels of perceived stress would be associated
with higher levels of substance use as a coping mechanism was supported by the
data, though moderately so. There was an association between the two variables
which was weak, r = 0.191; alpha=.01. The curvilinear relationship was depicted
in Figure 4.5. Given that the relationship between the two variables was not
significant as stated in the hypothesis, the null hypothesis was accepted.
Objective 2. The Substance Most Frequently Used as a Coping Mechanism
The second objective of the study was to establish the drug of choice for
students at the Mona campus of the University of the West Indies when they are
feeling stressed. As the results indicate, alcohol was the drug of choice among
respondents, with 21.6% of participants reporting use when feeling stressed.
Cigarettes were the second most prevalent, followed by cannabis, with 4.5% and
4.1% respectively reporting use of these substances. This finding is supported by
the extant literature which indicates that alcohol is a prevalent drug of choice on
university and college campuses in the United States (Baer et.al, 2001). The lack
of literature available for Jamaican universities and colleges makes comparison
impossible. However, prevalence data for the nation indicates that alcohol is the
most frequently used substance among youths between the ages of 15 to 17
(WHO).
56
Stress and Coping
The prevalence of the use of alcohol as a coping mechanism among
respondents bears significance for students at the University of the West Indies
since the use of alcohol as a tension reducer has been found to lead to problematic
drinking (O’Hare & Sherrer, 1997). Problematic drinking was outlined as any
consumption of alcohol associated with legal problems or disruptive behaviours.
Further research on the Mona campus can elucidate whether problem drinking is a
cause for concern in this setting and if so, it can set the stage for the necessary
education programmes warranted to address the situation. This has been the
approach in other universities where problem drinking has been identified as
disrupting student and campus life (Lang & Marlatt, 1982, as cited in Taylor,
2003).
Regarding the prevalence of cannabis use among the respondents, the
stated projection of 15% of the sample was not met. Rather, 4.1% of respondents
reported using cannabis as a coping mechanism. This rate appears to be lower
than prevalence data for the Jamaican population. It is possible that this low
rating was due to the effect respondents expected substances inclusive of cannabis
to have on them. Most respondents expected the use of CCAs to have a harmful
effect upon them. The ANOVA indicates that respondents’ expectations were
significantly related to the use of CCAs as a coping mechanism and accounted for
much of the variance in use. Low rates of cigarette use in coping were also
reported among the respondents (4.5%). This is also lower than prevalence rates
for Jamaica.
57
Stress and Coping
Objective3. Coping Styles Most Frequently Used by Students
The coping style reported as the most frequently used by students in
dealing with their levels of perceived stress was planning, with 38.1% of
participants endorsing this option. Active coping was the second most frequently
used coping style with 31.3% of respondents indicating that choice. It is apparent
that solution-focused coping is the dominant approach among students in the
sample. According to Gan, Shang, and Zhang (2007) this is an adaptive approach
to coping for university students who are faced with the many challenges of
balancing academic work with other aspects of life. This finding is potentially a
positive indicator for the psychological well-being of students at the Mona
campus of the University of the West Indies.
Consideration must be given to the fact that the study employed self-report
measures. Moreover, the data collection was done in the school environment. It
is not far-fetched to propose that social psychological factors may have impacted
students’ responses to items on the questionnaire. It would be an interesting
endeavor to administer perceived stress and coping instruments in different
settings and compare the results. This would be one way of assessing whether
Sasaki and Yamasaki’s (2007) concept of situational coping was being
represented in the present study. It is possible that the high reporting of planning
and active coping as approaches to dealing with stress was influenced by the
situation in which the research was conducted. This could have been the case as
students may have been reflecting primarily on the coping mechanisms they
engage in as it relates to school related stress. The finding that most participants
58
Stress and Coping
reported that school related stress was the most difficult type of stress to deal with
may be an indication that respondents’ attentions were grounded in their setting
while completing the instruments. However, this is an assumption which can
serve to inform future research into the area of situational and dispositional
coping as outlined by Sasaki and Yamasaki (2007).
Gender and Coping.
It is also of interest to note that there were no statistically significant
gender differences in coping styles identified in this study. However, there were
statistically significant differences in the perceptions of stressful experiences
among male and female respondents. Males were two times less likely than
females to report that relationship related stress was the most difficult for them.
On the other hand, males and females both reported that school related stress was
the most difficult type of stress for them to cope with.
Objective 4. Analysis of the Impact of Expectation of Substance Effect on the
Relationship between Level of Perceived Stress and Substance Use Coping
As previously mentioned, the ANOVA indicates statistically significant
differences between students’ substance use behaviour as a function of their
expectations of the substances’ impact. Whether this mediates the relationship
between level of perceived stress and substance use as a coping mechanism has
not been clearly established. Limitations related to the type of measurement
employed in the examination of substance effects restricted the possibilities for
statistical analysis. Although a relationship exists between expectations and
59
Stress and Coping
substance use coping scores, it cannot be stated conclusively that this relationship
impacted upon the association between substance use coping and perceived stress.
Limitations
One of the major weaknesses of this study was how the Brief COPE was
administered. Prior to the pilot study, the scale was abbreviated and one item
from each of the two-item scales of the Brief COPE was omitted. This made the
data limited in the statistical analysis which could be applied to it such as the
exclusion of regression analyses from the study. The original two-item scales
would have allowed for greater statistical analysis of each coping style.
Comparisons between coping styles and correlations between each coping style
and the Perceived Stress Scale were rendered impossible by the alteration. This
challenge could have been circumvented by removing sub-scales which were not
of immediate importance to the current research.
The other major weakness of this study is also related to measurement.
The researcher developed an item to assess respondents’ expectations of the
effects of cannabis, alcohol and cigarette use. However, the item was structured
in a manner which clustered all three substances together and did not allow for
two important things. First, the item failed to allow respondents to rate the effects
of each substance independently. Secondly, the item did not allow respondents to
indicate the extent to which each substance could have a positive, negative, or
mixed effect. For example, it would have been useful to know whether
respondents rated cannabis as having more or less calming effects than alcohol or
60
Stress and Coping
cigarettes. This type of rating scale can be developed using a five point likert-
type scale for each substance.
Recommendations
Findings of this study indicate that students of the Mona campus of the
UWI are experiencing moderate levels of stress comparable to the normative
sample of 332 students at the University of Oregon. However, universities around
the world are investing in their student body by developing programmes targeted
at educating them about stress reduction (Taylor, 2003). As such, it is the
recommendation of this researcher that the University of the West Indies
administrators and leaders give thought to the establishment of health awareness
courses. This would be to the benefit of students, particularly freshmen making
the transition into university life. Studies have shown that freshmen benefit from
programmes geared towards preparing them to handle the challenges of academia
(Gan, Shang, & Zhang, 2007).
Another recommendation arising from the study is the need for more
substance abuse awareness among students of the University of the West Indies.
Respondents indicated some misinformation concerning the chemically addictive
nature of some substances including heroine and crack/cocaine. Approximately
33% and 20% of respondents identified heroine and crack/cocaine respectively as
not being addictive substances. This demonstrates a lack of knowledge among
students or it could demonstrate a defiance of established facts. Nevertheless, the
recommendation of this researcher is to develop additional substance awareness
61
Stress and Coping
programmes to educate students about the properties of hard drugs such as
heroine and crack/cocaine.
Suggestions for Future Research
As it relates to future research in this field, it would be of interest to
discover whether Jamaicans and Caribbean people have different approaches to
coping. One particular aspect of interest would be to determine in what domains
the people of this region are more likely to engage in situational versus
dispositional coping. Also, it would be useful to examine which conditions are
more likely to elicit maladaptive and adaptive coping approaches. Furthermore, it
would be helpful to determine whether approaches labeled as maladaptive and
adaptive are perceived in the same way and produce the same results as their use
in other societies.
Conclusion
The measure of perceived stress reflected a normal distribution among
respondents in this study. The most dominant coping mechanism reported was
planning. Some might argue that these are positive indicators of the
psychological well-being of the respondents. Furthermore, actual substance use
coping behaviours were far less than what was projected based on international
trends. Compared to the prevalence data for Jamaica, this study shows
significantly lower use of cannabis and cigarettes. The hypothesis that perceived
stress and substance use coping would be positively related was moderately
supported. The secondary hypothesis which postulated that the relationship
between perceived stress and substance use coping would be mediated by
62
Stress and Coping
expectations was not adequately explored. However, there is reliable evidence
that expectations of substance impact accounted for much of the variance in
substance use coping scores. This finding is significant as it could indicate that
expectations mediate the relationship between the independent and dependent
variables. However, this cannot be stated conclusively from the data gathered in
this study.
One of the most important findings of this study is the low prevalence of
substance use as a coping mechanism among students of the Mona Campus of the
University of the West Indies. The high use of planning and active coping
strategies potentially make a case for assessing the student body as having at least
one indicator of positive psychological functioning. Further research is necessary
to examine the nature of the use of alcohol among UWI Mona students to
determine whether the substance is being misused. The findings of this research
indicate that students are making decisions based on their assumptions about
substances.
63
Stress and Coping
References
Abel, Wendel. (2003). Ganja-the facts. An article published in The Jamaica
Gleaner. Wednesday, November 5, 2003.
Aldwin, C.M., Sutton, K.J., & Lachman, M. (1996). The development of coping
resources in adulthood. Journal of Personality, 64.
Andrews, T. V. (1980). Sources and symptoms of stress among a sample of
Jamaican secondary school teachers (Doctoral Dissertation, University of
the West-Indies).
Baer, J.S., Kivlahan, D.R., Blume, A.W., McKnight, P., & Marlatt, G.A. (2001).
Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: 4-Year follow-up
and natural history. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 1310 – 1316.
Brady, K.T. & Sonne, S.C. (2000). The role of stress in alcohol use, alcoholism
treatment, and relapse. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 263-271.
Brunswick, A.F., Lewis, C.S., & Messeri, P.A. (1992). Drug use and stress:
Testing a coping model in an urban African-american sample. Journal of
Community Psychology, 20.
Canadian Senate Special Committee on Illegal Drugs. Cannabis: Our position for
a Canadian public policy
http://www.parl.gc.ca/37/1/parlbus/commbus/senate/com-e/ille-e/rep-e/
summary-e.pdf
Carver, C.S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long:
Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioural
Medicine, 4, 92 – 100.
64
Stress and Coping
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of
perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, 385 – 396.
Coomber, R., Oliver, M. & Morris, C. (2003). Using cannabis therapeutically in
the uk: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Drug Issues.
DeLongis, A. & Holtzman, S. (2005). Coping in context: The role of stress,
social support and personality in coping. Journal of Personality, 73.
Douglas, Ken-Garfield. (2000). Patterns of substance use and abuse among post
primary students. Prepared for Planning Institute of Jamaica Policy
Development Unit. Pear Tree Press: Kingston.
Duncan, R. (2000).Prevalance of upper extremity musculo-skeletal disorders,
eyestrain and stress related illness a(Doctoral Dissertation, University of
the West-Indies).
Dyson, R. & Renk, K. (2006). Freshmen adaptation to university life: Depressive
symptoms, stress, and coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 1231-
1244.
Edwards, A. A. (1988). Correlates of stress experienced by Common Entrance
candidates. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of the West-Indies).
Fergusson, D.M. & Horwood, L.J. (2000). Research report on cannabis: Does
cannabis use encourage other forms of illicit drug use? Addiction, 95,
505-520.
Freckleton, V. P. (1984). A study of the relationship between stress and
hypertension among factory workers in Jamaica (Doctoral Dissertation,
University of the West-Indies).
65
Stress and Coping
Gan, Y., Shang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2007). Coping flexibility and locus of control as
predictors of burnout among Chinese college students. Social Behavior
and Personality, 35, 1087-1098.
Gencoz, F., Gencoz, T., & Bozo, O. (2006). Hierarchical dimensions of coping
styles: A study conducted with Turkish university students. Social
Behavior and Personality, 34, 525-534.
George, D. & Mallory, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide
and reference. Allyn and Bacon: Boston.
Gruen, R.J., Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R.S. (1988). Centrality and individual
differences in the meaning of daily hassles. Journal of Personality. 56,
No. 4.
Herrington, A.N., Matheny, K.B., Curlette, W.L., McCarthy, C.J., & Penick, J.
(2005). Lifestyles, coping resources, and negative life events as predictors
of emotional distress in university women. The Journal of Individual
Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 4.
Howard, R.C. & Menkes, D.B. (2007). Changes in brain function during acute
cannabis intoxication: Preliminary findings suggest a mechanism for
cannabis-induced violence. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 17,
113-117.
Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on
emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality.1, 141 – 169.
66
Stress and Coping
Lindo, J. L. (2003). General mental well being among medical personnel in two
urban hospitals in Kingston, Jamaica (Doctoral Dissertation, University of
the West-Indies).
Matheny, K. B. & Ashby, J.S. (2005). Stress and coping and individual
psychology. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 61, No. 4
Matheny, K.B., Ashby, J.S., & Cupp, P. (2005). Gender differences in stress,
coping, and illness among college students. The Journal of Individual
Psychology, 61.
Mulligan Rauch, S.A. & Becker Bryant, J. (2000). Gender and Context
differences in alcohol expectancies. Journal of Social Psychology, 140,
240 – 253.
O’Hare, T. & Sherrer, M.V. (1997). Drinking problems, alcohol expectancies,
and drinking contexts in college first offenders. Journal of Alcohol and
Drug Education,.43, 31 – 46.
Oo, M. K. (2002). A study of postraumatic stress disorder among Jamaica
Constabulary Force personnel (Doctoral Dissertation, University of the
West-Indies).
Robotham, D. & Julian, C. (2006). Stress and the higher education student: a
critical review of the literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education,
30, 107–117.
Sasaki, M. & Yamasaki, K. (2007). Stress coping and the adjustment process
among university freshmen. Counselling psychology quarterly, 20, 51-67.
67
Stress and Coping
Scott-Fisher, K. (1999). Relationship between stressful life events and pain in
young adults age 20-34 (Doctoral Dissertation, University of the West-
Indies).
Struthers, C.W., Perry, R.P., & Menec, V.H. (2000). An examination of the
relationship among academic stress, coping, motivation, and performance
in college. Research in Higher Education, 41.
Taylor, Shelley E. (2003). Health Psychology. McGraw Hill: Boston.
Taylor, S.E., Lerner, J.S., Sage, R.M., Lehman, B.J., &. Seeman, T.E. (2004).
Early environment, emotions, responses to stress, and health. Journal of
Personality 72, 1365 - 1394.
Wallenstein, G.V., Pigeon, S., Kopans, B., Jacobs, D.B., Aseltine, R. (2007).
Results of national alcohol screening day: College demographics, clinical
characteristics and comparison with online screening. Journal of
American College Health, 55, 341- 350.
Williams, B.E. (1993).Self esteem and stress in public primary and private
preparatory schools(Doctoral Dissertation, University of the West-Indies).
UWI student demographics. (n.d.). Retrieved September 10, 2007, from
http://www.mona.uwi.edu/opair/profile/student-demographics.pdf
UWI student demographics. (n.d.). Retrieved October 1, 2007, from http://www.
mona.uwi.edu/opair/research/
WHO’s infobase. (n.d.) Retrieved April 3, 2008, from
http://www.who.int/infobase/mddetails.aspx?surveycode=102588a1
68
Stress and Coping
WHO’s infobase. (n.d.). Retreived April 3, 2008, from http://www.who.int
/infobase/reportviewer.aspx?
rptcode=ALL&uncode=388&dm=15&surveycode=101530c2
69
Stress and Coping
Appendix AThis is a survey of your style of coping with stress. Your most accurate response is greatly appreciated. Thank you for your participation. Please place a tick in the appropriate box.
A. Age Range: Under 18 18 – 21 22 – 25 26- 29
30 & up
B. Sex:Male Female
C. Faculty: Law Medical Sciences Social Sciences
Pure & Applied Sciences Humanities & Education
D. Major: ___________________________________
E. Degree: Bachelor’s Master’s Doctoral
Diploma/ Other (Specify)______________
F. Status: Full-Time Part-Time
G. Reside:On-Campus Off-Campus
H. Hall of Attachment: Aston Preston Chancellor Irvine
Mary Seacole Rex Nettleford Taylor
I. Relationship Status: Single Committed Recently Separated
Widowed
J. Number of Children: None 1 – 2 3 - 4 5 or more
K. Race/ Ethnicity: Black Caucasian/ Caucasian Descent Chinese/ Chinese Descent Indian/
Indian Descent Mixed (Specify)______________
Other (Specify) _______________________________________
L. Nationality: Jamaican Other (Specify) ____________________
70
Stress and Coping
The next section asks you about your feelings and thoughts during the last month. In
each case, please indicate with a check how often you felt or thought a certain way.
Never AlmostNever
SometimesFairly Often
VeryOften
1. In the last month, how often have you been upset because of something that happened unexpectedly?
2. In the last month, how often have you felt that you were unable to control the important things in your life?
3. In the last month, how often have you felt nervous and "stressed"?
4. In the last month, how often have you felt confident about your ability to handle your personal problems?
5. In the last month, how often have you felt that things were going your way?
6. In the last month, how often have you found that you could not cope with all the things that you had to do?
7. In the last month, how often have you been able to control irritations in your life?
8. In the last month, how often have you felt that you were on top of things?
9. . In the last month, how often have you been angered because of things that were outside of your control?
10. In the last month, how often have you felt difficulties were piling up so high that you could not overcome them?
71
Stress and Coping
These items deal with ways you've been coping with the stress in your life in the past 30
days. Each item describes a particular way of coping. I want to know to what extent
you've been doing what the item says - how much or how frequently. Don't answer on
the basis of whether it seems to be working or not—just whether or not you're doing it.
Try to rate each item separately in your mind from the others. Make your answers as true
FOR YOU as you can.
Please place a tick in the box with the response that best describes you.
Your way of copingI haven't been doing this at all
I've been doing this a little bit
I've been doing this a medium amount
I've been doing this a lot
11. I've been saying to myself “this isn't real”.
12. I've been using alcohol, ganja, cigarettes or other drugs to make myself feel better.
13. I've been getting emotional support like comfort and understanding from others.
14. I've been giving up trying to deal with it.
15. I've been taking action to try to make the situation better.
16. I've been saying things to let my unpleasant feelings escape.
17. I’ve been getting help and advice from other people.
18. I've been using alcohol, ganja, cigarettes or other drugs to help me get through it.
19. I've been trying to see it in a different light, to make it seem more positive.
72
Stress and Coping
Your way of copingI haven't been doing this at all
I've been doing this a little bit
I've been doing this a medium amount
I've been doing this a lot
20. I've been trying to come up with a strategy about what to do.
21. I've been doing something to think about it less, such as going to movies, watching TV, reading, daydreaming, sleeping, or shopping.
22. I've been trying to find comfort in my religion or spiritual beliefs. (Prayer/
23. I've been learning to live with the stressors.
24. I’ve been blaming myself for things that happened.
25. I've been making fun/ jokes about the situation.
26. Which type of stress is the most ___ School Related (e.g. papers,
difficult for you to deal with: exams, registration, etc.)
___ Relationship Related (e.g. break
up, argument, etc.)
___ Home Related (e.g. parents argue,
family dispute, etc.)
___ Other (Specify)_______________
73
Stress and Coping
27. For which type of stress are you ___ School Related (e.g. papers,
most likely to drink alcohol, smoke exams, registration, etc.)
a cigarette, or use ganja (seasoned ___ Relationship Related (e.g. break
spliff, chillum pipe, etc.) to cope? up, argument, etc.)
___ Home Related (e.g. parents argue,
family dispute, etc.)
___ Other (Specify)_______________
___ None
28. Which of the following substances ___ Alcohol ___ Cigarette
are you most likely to use when ___ Ganja ___ None
feeling stressed: ___ Other (Specify) ______________
29. Which of the following ___ Crack/ Cocaine ___ Alcohol
substances are drugs that ___ Ganja ___ Cigarettes
people can be addicted to? ___ Heroine ___ Ecstasy
30. If you were to use alcohol, ___Reduce Tension ___Enhance Sexual Performance
cigarettes, or ganja, which ___Improve Health ___Increase Concentration
of these effects would you ___Reduce Nervousness ___Damage Brain Cells
expect it to have on you? ___None ___Damage Other Organs
Thank You!
74
Stress and Coping
Appendix B
Informed Consent Stress and Coping Among Students of the
University of the West Indies, Mona Campus
You are being asked to participate in a research study. Before you give your consent to volunteer, it is important that you read the following information and ask as many questions as necessary to be sure you understand what you will be asked to do.
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Karen Carpenter, PhD, Department of Language, Linguistics, and
Philosophy University of the West Indies, Mona Campus. [email protected]
Co-Investigator: Shelly-Ann James, M.Sc. Clinical Psychology (Candidate), Department of Sociology, Psychology and Social Work, UWI,
Mona. Email: [email protected] Telephone: (876) 881-4853.
Purpose of the ResearchThis research study is designed to measure the level of stress being experienced by students on the Mona Campus of the University of the West Indies and to ascertain the coping styles being employed by students.The results of this study will contribute to the research project as part of the requirements of the degree Master in Clinical Psychology. ProceduresIf you volunteer to participate in this study, you will be asked to complete a questionnaire during class time and submit it to the Co-Investigator. Your participation will take approximately 10 minutes. Potential Risks or DiscomfortsRisks associated with this study are minimal. Inconveniences have also been minimized. Risks and inconveniences to you may include:
1. Time taken from lecture2. Potential for unpleasant thoughts or feelings aroused by items on the
questionnaire
75
Stress and Coping
If at any time you feel that participation in the study is too burdensome you are free to withdraw by discontinuing the questionnaire. Potential Benefits of the ResearchBy participating in this project you may be exposed to material which may assist you in thinking of different ways of coping with stress. This research may also benefit the student body as results will be submitted to the university’s Health Centre for consideration when planning Health Education Promotions.
Confidentiality and Data StorageYour identity will be protected as your name will not be taken by the researcher. A number will be assigned to all questionnaires and there will be no way of identifying you in the study. All questionnaires will be processed by number only and will be kept in private offices at all times. Only the Principal Investigator, Co-Investigator, and Statistician will have access to the questionnaires. They will be shredded after the University has collected the research paper.
Participation and WithdrawalYour participation in this research study is voluntary. As a participant you may refuse to participate at anytime. If you decide to participate, you are free to withdraw at anytime. To withdraw from the study you simply have to discontinue the questionnaire. Please destroy the questionnaire and throw it in the nearest bin. However, as the data is anonymous, please note that you will be unable to withdraw after you have submitted your questionnaire as there will be no way of determining which questionnaire was completed by you.
If You Need to Talk With SomeoneAs you complete this questionnaire, you may discover that you are uncomfortable with your approach to handling stress. If this applies to you, you may make contact with the Counselling Centre at the University’s Health Centre to make an appointment at Tel. 927-2520 or 970-1992, Monday – Friday, 8:30 am – 4:30 pm.
Questions about the ResearchIf you have any questions about the research, please speak with Shelly-Ann James, Co-Investigator: [email protected], (876) 886-5405; or Dr. Karen Carpenter, Principal Investigator, Dept. of Language, Linguistics, and Philosophy UWI Mona. If you have questions later, you may contact either of the above mentioned persons.
This project has been reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of the West Indies/ University of the West Indies Faculty of Medical Sciences. If you believe there is any infringement upon your rights as a research participant, you may contact the Chair, Professor Archibald McDonald at (876) 927-2556.
76
Stress and Coping
If you agree to participate a copy of this form will be given to you.
My signature below indicates that I have read and understood this document and that I agree to participate in this research study.
___________________________ ____________ __________________________________
Participant’s Name (Please Print) Date Participant’s Signature
___________________________ ____________ __________________________________
Co-Investigator’s Name Date Co-Investigator’s Signature
___________________________ _____________Signature of Witness Date
Please sign and tear off the section below this line and return to the co-investigator.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------My signature below indicates that I have read and understood this document and that I agree to participate in the research study Perceived Stress and Coping.
___________________________ ___________ _______________________Participant’s Name (Please Print) Date Participant’s Signature
___________________________ ___________ _______________________Co-Investigator’s Name Date Co-Investigator’s Signature
77