EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 11 - Fall 2010
description
Transcript of EE 5340 Semiconductor Device Theory Lecture 11 - Fall 2010
EE 5340Semiconductor Device TheoryLecture 11 - Fall 2010
Professor Ronald L. [email protected]
http://www.uta.edu/ronc
L11 27Sep10
Band diagram forp+-n jctn* at Va = 0
Ec
EFNEFi
Ev
Ec
EFP
EFi
Ev
0 xn
x-xp
-xpc xnc
qp < 0
qn > 0
qVbi = q(n - p)
*Na > Nd -> |p| > n
p-type for x<0 n-type for x>0
2
L11 27Sep10
Depletion approx.charge distribution
xn
x-xp
-xpc xnc
+qNd
-qNa
+Qn’=qNdxn
Qp’=-qNaxp
Due to Charge
neutrality Qp’ + Qn’ =
0, => Naxp =
Ndxn
[Coul/cm2]
[Coul/cm2]3
L11 27Sep10
Induced E-fieldin the D.R.
xn
x-xp-xpc xnc
O-O-O-
O+O+
O+
Depletion region (DR)
p-type CNR
Ex
Exposed Donor ions
Exposed Acceptor Ions
n-type chg neutral reg
p-contact N-contact
W
04
L11 27Sep10
Soln to Poisson’sEq in the D.R.
xnx
-xp
-xpc xnc
Ex
-Emax
dx qN
dxdE
ax qN
dxdE
5
L11 27Sep10
Soln to Poisson’sEq in the D.R. (cont.)
WV2N2qV
E then
,WE21
V have also must we Since
.NN
NNN where ,
qNV2
W
then ,xxW let and ,xNxN
bieffbimax
maxbi
da
daeff
eff
bi
pnpand
6
L11 27Sep10
Effect of V 0
• Define an external voltage source, Va, with the +term at the p-type contact and the -term at the n-type contact
• For Va > 0, the Va induced field tends to oppose Ex due to DR
• For Va < 0, the Va induced field tends to add to Ex due to DR
• Will consider Va < 0 now7
L11 27Sep10 8
Band diagram forp+-n jctn* at Va 0
EcEFN
EFi
Ev
Ec
EFP
EFi
Ev
0 xn
x-xp
-xpc xnc
qp < 0
qn > 0
q(Vbi-Va)
*Na > Nd -> |p| > n
p-type for x<0 n-type for x>0
q(Va)
L11 27Sep10 9
Soln to Poisson’sEq in the D.R.
xnx
-xp
-xpc xnc
Ex
-Emax(V)
dx qN
dxdE
ax qN
dxdE
-Emax(V-V)
W(Va)W(Va-V)
L11 27Sep10
effbimax
eff
bi
xa
abinx
pxx
NVaV2qE
and ,qN
VaV2W
are Solutions .E reduce to tends V to
due field the since ,VVdxE
that is now change only The
Effect of V 0
10
L11 27Sep10
Effect of V 0• Lever rule, Naxp = Ndxn, still applies
• Vbi = Vt ln(NaNd/ni2), still applies
• W = xp + xn, still applies
• Neff = NaNd/(Na + Nd), still applies
• Q’n = qNdxn = -Q’p = qNaxp, still applies
• For Va < 0, W increases and Emax increases
11
L11 27Sep10
One-sided p+n or n+p jctns• If p+n, then Na >> Nd, and
NaNd/(Na + Nd) = Neff --> Nd, and W --> xn, DR is all on lightly d. side
• If n+p, then Nd >> Na, and NaNd/(Na + Nd) = Neff --> Na, and W --> xp, DR is all on lightly d. side
• The net effect is that Neff --> N-, (- = lightly doped side) and W --> x-
12
L11 27Sep10
Depletion Approxi-mation (Summary)• For the step junction defined by
doping Na (p-type) for x < 0 and Nd, (n-type) for x > 0, the depletion width
W = {2(Vbi-Va)/qNeff}1/2, where Vbi = Vt ln{NaNd/ni
2}, and Neff=NaNd/(Na+Nd). Since Naxp=Ndxn,
xn = W/(1 + Nd/Na), and xp = W/(1 + Na/Nd).
13
L11 27Sep10
Debye length• The DA assumes n changes from Nd to
0 discontinuously at xn, likewise, p changes from Na to 0 discontinuously at -xp.
• In the region of xn, Poisson’s eq is E = / --> dEx/dx = q(Nd - n),
and since Ex = -d/dx, we have-d2/dx2 = q(Nd - n)/ to be solved
n
xxn
Nd
0
14
L11 27Sep10
Debye length (cont)• Since the level EFi is a reference for
equil, we set = Vt ln(n/ni)
• In the region of xn, n = ni exp(/Vt), so d2/dx2 = -q(Nd - ni e
/Vt), let = o + ’, where o = Vt ln(Nd/ni) so Nd - ni e
/Vt = Nd[1 - e/Vt-o/Vt], for - o = ’ << o, the DE becomes d2’/dx2
= (q2Nd/kT)’, ’ << o
15
L11 27Sep10
Debye length (cont)• So ’ = ’(xn) exp[+(x-xn)/LD]+con.
and n = Nd e’/Vt, x ~ xn, where LD is the “Debye length”
material. intrinsic for 2n and type-p
for N type,-n for N pn :Note
length. transition a ,q
kTV ,
pnqV
L
i
ad
tt
D
16
L11 27Sep10
Debye length (cont)• LD estimates the transition length of a step-
junction DR (concentrations Na and Nd with Neff =
NaNd/(Na +Nd)). Thus,
bi
efft
da0V
dDaDV2
NV
N1
N1
W
NLNL
a
• For Va=0, & 1E13 < Na,Nd < 1E19
cm-3
13% < < 28% => DA is OK17
L11 27Sep10
JunctionC (cont.)
xn
x-xp
-xpc xnc
+qNd
-qNa
+Qn’=qNdxn
Qp’=-qNaxp
Charge neutrality => Qp’ + Qn’ = 0,
=> Naxp = Ndxn
Qn’=qNdxn
Qp’=-qNaxp
18
L11 27Sep10
JunctionCapacitance• The junction has +Q’n=qNdxn (exposed
donors), and (exposed acceptors) Q’p=-qNaxp = -Q’n, forming a parallel sheet charge capacitor.
2da
daabi
da
daabi
a
d
dndn
cm
Coul ,
NN
NNVVq2
,NqN
NNVV2
N
N1
qNxqN'Q
19
L11 27Sep10
JunctionC (cont.)• So this definition of the capacitance
gives a parallel plate capacitor with charges Q’n and Q’p(=-Q’n), separated by, L (=W), with an area A and the capacitance is then the ideal parallel plate capacitance.
• Still non-linear and Q is not zero at Va=0.
20
L11 27Sep10
JunctionC (cont.)• This Q ~ (Vbi-Va)
1/2 is clearly non-linear, and Q is not zero at Va = 0.
• Redefining the capacitance,
[Fd] W
C and ][Fd/cm W
C so
NNVVNqN
dVdQ
C
Aj
2j
daabi
da
a
nj
,,,'
,'
2
21
L11 27Sep10
JunctionC (cont.)• The C-V relationship simplifies to
][Fd/cm ,NNV2
NqN'C herew
equation model a ,VV
1'C'C
2
dabi
da0j
21
bi
a0jj
22
L11 27Sep10
JunctionC (cont.)• If one plots [Cj]
-2 vs. Va
Slope = -[(Cj0)2Vbi]-1
vertical axis intercept = [Cj0]-2 horizontal axis intercept = Vbi
Cj-2
Vbi
Va
Cj0-2
1M31
VVJ C0CJ
VJV
10CJACC
:Equation Model
bi0j
M
jj
,~,~
'
23