Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual...

37
Water Quality Evaluation Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Per Cajamarca, Per ú ú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6, 2006 Canal Campanario Jun-05

Transcript of Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual...

Page 1: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

Water Quality EvaluationWater Quality EvaluationCajamarca, PerCajamarca, Perúú

Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report2004-2005

Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca

February 6, 2006

Canal Campanario Jun-05

Page 2: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Why Participatory Monitoring?

Recommendation of original Mesa study, November 2003.

Implemented by the Mesa and CAO in 2004-2005.

Page 3: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Participatory Monitoring

Canal Users COMOCA Sur COMOCA Este

SEDACAJ (municipal water)

CommunitiesCooperativa Granja PorcónCentro Poblado YanacanchaCentro Poblado Llaucán

Other Institutions have implemented participatory programs since 2003.With assistance from Minera Yanacocha

Page 4: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Approximately 50 institutions participated

Define technical objectives

Participate with other institutions to leverage results.

Evaluate data quality.

Create a database of all monitoring results.

Interpretation.

Mesa Workshop on Participatory Monitoring - 2004

Page 5: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Define community objectives

Encourage participation.

Generate confidence in results.

Communicate results to urban and rural people.

Encourage institutions to take responsibility.

Mesa Workshop on Participatory Monitoring

Page 6: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Participatory Monitoring Program Structure - Staff

CAO Funding, oversight

Mesa Coordination with

institutions and community

Technical team Field and laboratory

work, database, interpretation

Page 7: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Participatory Monitoring Program Structure - Volunteers

Veedores from Mesa institutions

Observe field workCoordinate with

community

Technical CommissionReview work of

technical teamPublic communication

Page 8: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Monitoring Locations - 108 total

PORCON BASIN: 51 points

REJO BASIN: 12 points

HONDA BASIN: 16 points

CHONTA BASIN: 18 points

POTABLE WATER IN CAJAMARCA:2 treatment plant discharge points 3 points in the network

POINTS IN THE MINE4 groundwater wells 2 discharge points

Rejo Basin

Honda Basin

Chonta Basin

Porcón Basin

Page 9: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Monitoring Frequency

Monthly:

COMOCA SurCOMOCA EsteSEDACAJCooperativa Granja PorcónCentro Poblado YanacanchaCentro Poblado Llaucán

Quarterly:

Minera YanacochaCOMOCA EsteCentro Poblado Yanacancha

Page 10: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Monitoring Analyses

Field Parameters Total metalsFecal coliform bacteriaTotal Dissolved Solids (TDS)Total Suspended Solids (TSS)WAD cyanide

Page 11: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Samples Collected between July 2004 and August 2005

1044 samples collected by institutions120 duplicates collected by Mesa

Page 12: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Evaluate integrity and quality of samples collected by participating institutions

Credibility and confidence in larger data set

More rapid results for critical points

Duplicate samples used to

Page 13: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Quality Control

The Mesa and the participating institutions collect samples at the same location and time.

Allows technical team to check whether:

The samples are altered during handling and shipping.The samples are altered at the

laboratory.Laboratory performance.

Page 14: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Canal Azufre Atunconga

0

1

2

3

Al As Ca Fe Mg Mn K Na Zn

Metales Totales

mg/

LCOMOCA ESTE CAA-1 SGS 08-Jun-05 MESA A-C113 ALS 08-Jun-05

Institución COMOCA ESTE MESA

Cuenca Chonta Chonta

NombreCanal Azufre Atunconga

Canal Azufre Atunconga

Muestra_ID CAA-1 A-C113-CE

Laboratorio SGS ALS

fecha 08-Jun-05 08-Jun-05 PDR

Aluminio 1.46 1.474 1%

Arsénico 0.009 0.009 0%

Cadmio 0.001 U 0.001 U na

Calcio 2.55 2.66 4%

Cobre 0.001 U 0.003 na

Cromo 0.001 U 0.002 U na

Hierro 0.78 0.843 8%

Magnesio 0.2 0.21 5%

Manganeso 0.03 0.0291 3%

Mercurio 0.001 U 0.0004 U na

Níquel 0.001 U 0.004 U na

Plata 0.001 U 0.001 U na

Plomo 0.006 0.01 U na

Potasio 0.78 0.76 3%

Selenio 0.005 U 0.002 U na

Sodio 1.422 1.33 6%

Talio 0.005 U 0.01 U na

Zinc 0.028 0.026 7%

The criterion for acceptance of duplicate samples for total metals is relative percent difference less than 35%

Source: USEPA 1994

Quality Control

Page 15: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Quality Control - Results

The results are acceptable for the evaluation.We have confidence in the monitoring conducted by the participating

institutions.

Page 16: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Data Evaluation

The technical team evaluates data on a monthly basis in comparison to:National standardsInternational guidelines

The technical commission meets several times per month to review the data interpretation and communicate results

Page 17: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Data Evaluation - National Standards

Evaluation according to the Ley General de Aguas D.L. 17752

CLASS II:Porcón Basin (rivers and streams)

CLASS III:Rejo, Chonta, Honda Basins (rivers and streams)

Porcón, Rejo, Chonta, Honda Basins (canals)

SUNASS:Potable water in the city of Cajamarca

Rejo Basin

Class III

Honda Basin

Class III

Porcón Basin

Class II

Chonta Basin

Class III

Page 18: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

In general, all the rivers and streams comply with Class II standardsOne of the 15 canals does not comply with Clase III standards.

Canal Encajón Collotán (CEC-1)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

Jul-04Au

g-04Sep-0

4Oc

t-04

Nov-0

4De

c-04

Jan-05Feb-0

5Ma

r-05

Apr-0

5Ma

y-05

Jun-05Jul

-05Au

g-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L LMP Clase III 0.1

Results

Porcón Basin

Potable water for the City of Cajamarca complies with the standards of SUNASS.

Page 19: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

In general, all the rivers, streams and canals comply with Class III standards.

Rejo Basin

Results

Río Rejo (RT-6)

00.020.040.060.080.1

0.12

Jun-0

4

Aug-04

Oct-04

Dec-04

Feb-05

Apr-05

Jun-0

5

Aug-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L

Fecal coliform bacteria from humans and animals at some locations and times did not comply with Class III standards.

Río Tinte (RT-7)

0500

10001500200025003000

Jun-0

4

Aug-04

Oct-04

Dec-04

Feb-05

Apr-05

Jun-0

5

Aug-05

meses

NM

P/10

0mL

Coliformes

LMP Clase III: 1000

LMP Clase III: 0.1

Page 20: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Results

Honda Basin

In general, all the rivers and streams comply with Class III standards with the exception of Quebrada Pampa Larga.

Water quality in one of three canals does not comply with Class III standards.

Qda Pampa Larga (QPL-4)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Aug

-04

Sep

-04

Oct

-04

Nov

-04

Dec

-04

Jan-

05

Feb-

05

Mar

-05

Apr

-05

May

-05

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug

-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L

Canal Campanario

00.020.040.060.080.1

0.120.14

Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05

meses

Plom

o m

g/L

CCAM-1

LMP Clase III: 0.10.128 mg/L

LMP Clase III: 0.1

Page 21: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

In general, all the rivers and streams comply with Class III standards.

Chonta Basin

Results

All canals evaluated comply with Class III standards.

Qda Chaquicocha (QCH)

00.020.040.060.080.1

0.120.14

Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05

Jun-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L LMP Clase III: 0.1

Canal Azufre Atunconga (CAA-1)

00.020.040.060.080.1

0.12

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L

LMP Clase III: 0.1

Page 22: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Fecal coliform bacteria resulting from human and animal waste frequently exceed Class II and III standards and are a concern in all four basins.

Río Hornamayo (RHOR)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

Nov-04 Dec-04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05

Meses

Results

LMP Clase II 4000

Canal Colpa (CCOL-1)

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Col

iform

es F

ecal

es

NM

P/10

0mL

LMP Clase III 1000

Page 23: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Comparison to International guidelines

Human consumption (WHO, USEPA)Livestock (State of Nevada - USA, Environment Canada)Irrigation (FAO, State of Nevada - USA, Environment Canada)

Page 24: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Water that exits the treatment plant for the City of Cajamarca complies with international guidelines.

Human Consumption

In general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines (except for fecal coliform bacteria).

Comparison to International guidelines

Porcón BasinRío Porcón (RPO)

010000200003000040000500006000070000

Jun-0

4

Aug-04

Oct-04

Dec-04

Feb-05

Apr-05

Jun-0

5

Aug-05

Meses

Colif

orm

es F

ecal

es

OMS: 0

El Milagro Salida (EMS)

00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01

0.012

Dec-04

Jan-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L

OMS: 0.01

Page 25: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

IrrigationIn general, rivers and streams comply with international guidelinesFour of 15 canals do not comply with international guidelines for copper and manganese (Tual, Encajón Collotán, Quishuar and Llagamarca)

LivestockIn general, rivers and streams comply with international guidelinesTwo of 15 canals do not comply with international guidelines for arsenic and lead (Encajón Collotán and Quishuar)

Comparison to International guidelines

Porcón BasinCanal Quishuar (CQ-1)

00.020.040.060.080.1

0.120.14

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L

Canal Tual (CTU-3)

00.050.1

0.150.2

0.250.3

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Cobr

e m

g/L

OMS: 0.01

OMS: 0.2

Page 26: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Human ConsumptionIn general, rivers and streams comply with international guidelines, except for lead (Qda Shoclla) and fecal coliform bacteria.

Comparison to International guidelines

Rejo Basin

LivestockIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines.

IrrigationIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines.

Qda Shoclla (QSCLL3)

00.010.020.030.040.050.06

Jun-0

4

Aug-04

Oct-04

Dec-04

Feb-05

Apr-05

Jun-0

5

Aug-05

meses

Plo

mo

mg/

L

OMS: 0.01

Page 27: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Human ConsumptionIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines, except for lead (Qda Pampa Larga) and selenium (Canal Tual)

Comparison to International guidelines

Honda Basin

Canal Tual (CTU-1)

00.010.020.030.040.050.06

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Sele

nio

mg/

L

Qda Pampa Larga (QPL-4)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Aug

-04

Sep

-04

Oct

-04

Nov

-04

Dec

-04

Jan-

05

Feb-

05

Mar

-05

Apr

-05

May

-05

Jun-

05

Jul-0

5

Aug

-05

Meses

Plom

o m

g/L

OMS: 0.01

OMS: 0.01

Page 28: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

IrrigationIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines, except for total dissolved solids.Two of three canals do not comply with international guidelines for Copper and Selenium (Tual), and Arsenic and Manganese (Campanario).

Comparison to International guidelines

Honda Basin

LivestockIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines.One of three canals does not comply with international guidelines for arsenic and lead (Campanario).

Canal Campanario (CCAM-1)

00.0050.01

0.0150.02

0.0250.03

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Arsé

nico

mg/

L

Canadá: 0.025

Canal Tual (CTU-1)

00.10.20.30.40.50.60.7

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Cob

re m

g/L

FAO: 0.02

Page 29: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Human ConsumptionIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines, except for lead and arsenic (Canal Azufre Atunconga), lead (Qda San José) and arsenic and lead (Qda Chaquicocha).

Comparison to International guidelines

Chonta Basin

Qda San José

00.0050.01

0.0150.02

0.0250.03

Aug-04

Sep-04

Oct-04

Nov-04

Dec-04

Jan-0

5Feb

-05Mar-

05Apr-

05May

-05Ju

n-05

Jul-0

5Aug

-05

meses

Plo

mo

mg/

L

OMS = 0.01

Qda Chaquicocha (QCH)

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

Nov-04

Dec-04

Jan-0

5

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5

Meses

Arsé

nico

mg/

L

Canal Azufre Atunconga (CAA-1)

0

0.005

0.01

0.015

0.02

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Ars

énic

o m

g/L

OMS: 0.01

OMS: 0.01

Page 30: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

LivestockIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines.

Comparison to International guidelines

Chonta Basin

IrrigationIn general, rivers, streams and canals comply with international guidelines.One of ten canals does not comply with international guidelines for aluminum and manganese (La Shacsha)

Canal La Shacsha (CSH-1)

0

2

4

6

8

10

Jul-0

4Aug

-04Sep

-04Oct-

04Nov-0

4Dec-0

4Ja

n-05

Feb-05

Mar-05

Apr-05

May-05

Jun-0

5Ju

l-05

Aug-05

Meses

Alu

min

io m

g/L

FAO: 5

Page 31: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Recommendations

Determine the source of drinking water for rural people.

For those that do not have access to a potable water source, evaluate the quality of the source.

Locate alternative sources if necessary.

Human Consumption

Page 32: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Continue to evalaute water quality in: The upper part of Qda Honda, Honda Basin.The upper part of Río Grande, Porcon Basin.The upper part of Río San José and Canal La Shacsha, Chonta Basin.

Determine whether manganese is a concern for irrigation.

Recommendations

Agriculture (Livestock and Irrigation)

Page 33: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Recommendations

Develop better procedures for measuring flow rates.

Standardize procedures for data quality control.

Encourage the active participation of veedores.

Improve coordination and cooperation between institutions that monitor water.

Evaluate trends in the data month by month.

Improve the communication of information to the public.

For Future Water Monitoring

Page 34: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

General Forums

Rural officials

Canal users

Urban institutions

Government institutions

Cajamarca Regional Government

INIA/Agriculture Ministry

DESA (regional health ministry)

DREM (regional Ministry of Energy and Mines)

CAR (environment commission of regional government)

Mesa de Dialogo of the Municipality of Cajamarca

CONAM (Environment)

Communication and Outreach for this Report

Page 35: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Communication and Outreach for this ReportWater user/canal associations

Tual

Shacsha Uñigán

Tomacucho

Cocán

Jequetepeque

Villages (Centros Poblados)

Tumbaden

Huacataz

Yanacancha Baja

Page 36: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Communication and Outreach for this Report

NGOs

Defensoria del Pueblo

International aid organizations

ITDG

Solidaridad Internacionál

CEDEPAS

CARE Perú

Educational institutions

UPAGU (private university)

Engineering college

Press

Page 37: Water Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Quality Evaluation Cajamarca, Perú Summary of the Annual Monitoring Report 2004-2005 Mesa de Dialogo y Consenso CAO-Cajamarca February 6,

EvaluaciEvaluacióón de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca n de la Calidad del Agua Cajamarca --PerPerúú

Acknowledgements

CAO

Participating institutions

Mesa staff in Cajamarca

Technical team

Elizabeth Morales

Carlo Calderon

Eduardo Montoya

Technical Commission

Marietta Cervantes (INIA)

Cesar Torres (COMOCA Sur)

Alejandro DeBary (Minera Yanacocha)

Carlos Diez (Solidaridad Internacionál)