THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED PRICE AND ADVERTISEMENT ON PURCHASE DECISION OF ABC SYRUP (The Research...
-
Upload
muhamad-body-prahala -
Category
Marketing
-
view
48 -
download
0
Transcript of THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED PRICE AND ADVERTISEMENT ON PURCHASE DECISION OF ABC SYRUP (The Research...
1
THE INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED PRICE AND
ADVERTISEMENT ON PURCHASE DECISION OF ABC SYRUP
(The Research is on Inhabitants of DKI Jakarta Province)
Setyo Ferry WibowoFaculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta
Email: [email protected]
Muhamad Body PrahalaFaculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta
Email: [email protected]
Basrah SaidaniFaculty of Economics, State University of Jakarta
Email: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
The purposes of this research are: (1) to examine empirically the influence ofperceived price on purchase decision of ABC syrup, (2) to examine empirically theinfluence of advertisement on purchase decision of ABC syrup. This research usessurvey method for collecting data. The objects in this research are 200 respondents ofDKI Jakarta inhabitants who had purchased ABC syrup in the minimarket orsupermarket located in DKI Jakarta within the past two years. The method used inthis research is linear regression analysis with SPSS Statistic for Windows 20.0software. The results of hypothesis testing show: (1) there is an influence of perceivedprice on purchase decision with the value of tcount 6.067 and significance 0.000, (2)there is an influence of advertisement on purchase decision with the value of tcount
7.201 and significance 0.000. The result of determination coefficient (R2) shows that49,1% variation of purchase decision is explained by perceived price andadvertisement. The results of this research are beneficial for PT Heinz ABCIndonesia to formulate a better strategy in terms of increasing purchase decision ofABC syrup product.
Keyword: perceived price, advertisement, purchase decision
2
PREFACE
Background
The increasingly fierce competition in the business world because every
company must have to succeed in doing business. One of the vital efforts made to win
the competition in business is through marketing activities, the process of creating
value for customers and build strong relationships with customers with the aim to
capture value from customers in return. The results of marketing activities can be
measured directly from the sale of products or the extent to which the product can be
accepted in the community through the consumers’ purchase decisions of the product.
ABC syrup from PT Heinz ABC Indonesia is one of the major brands of syrup
favored by the community because in addition to delicious and refreshing, ABC
syrup also contains 100% pure sugar with no artificial sweeteners so that more thick
and fragrant. Comes with two variants, squash syrup and treacle, ABC is not alone in
the industry but rather competing with Marjan and several other brands such as
Tjampolay, Marquisa Pohon Pinang, Kurnia, Bangau, Freiss and others. They are
competing to win consumers’ purchase decisions, especially in terms of price and
advertisement. Moreover, the conditions and consumer behavior in Indonesia,
especially capital Jakarta is very selective about the product, especially when the
product is a consumer needs. Here is the data of Top Brand Index, Top of Mind and
Last Usage ABC syrup products quoted from Frontier Consulting Group for the
period of 2007-2014.
Picture 1. Top Brand Index Syrup
3
Picture 2. Top Of Mind Syrup
Picture 3. Last Usage SyrupSource: Frontier Consulting Group (2014)
The picture 1, 2 and 3 show that the problems faced by ABC syrup products
are quite serious in maintaining its position as a major brand in syrup industry in
Indonesia. Both in terms of Top Brand, Top of Mind and Last Usage ABC syrup have
a very good influence in 2007 as evidenced by a quite significant gap or difference
compared to the competitors, even though Marjan. However, as time goes by it seems
the company of ABC syrup did not do much to face the changing dynamics of market
appetite nor consumer demand so that the impact on the declined consumer’s
preferences towards product. It is unfortunate that the ABC syrup declined interests
and preferences on consumer purchasing decisions syrup.
The data of ABC syrup consumer’s preference on the downward trend was
also supported by syrup consumer’s opinions stating his choice to consume more any
4
other brand syrup than ABC syrup. The form of expression of the opinion is written
in the website that can be seen and read by everyone. Here is consumer opinion data
that researchers quote from Yahoo! Answers and Kaskus.
Picture 4. The opinion of syrup consumers in Yahoo! AnswerSource: Yahoo! Answer (2013)
4
other brand syrup than ABC syrup. The form of expression of the opinion is written
in the website that can be seen and read by everyone. Here is consumer opinion data
that researchers quote from Yahoo! Answers and Kaskus.
Picture 4. The opinion of syrup consumers in Yahoo! AnswerSource: Yahoo! Answer (2013)
4
other brand syrup than ABC syrup. The form of expression of the opinion is written
in the website that can be seen and read by everyone. Here is consumer opinion data
that researchers quote from Yahoo! Answers and Kaskus.
Picture 4. The opinion of syrup consumers in Yahoo! AnswerSource: Yahoo! Answer (2013)
5
Picture 5. The opinion of syrup consumers in KaskusSource: Kaskus (2015)
Price is determined by the cost of the product and the will of the profit margin
to be obtained by the company. Swastha and Irawan (in Novandri, 2010: 2) then
revealed that if the price set by the company appropriately and in accordance with the
purchasing power of consumers, then the selection of a particular product would be
imposed on those products. Just as well the price set by the company is also
considering the value, benefits, and quality of products so that can be accepted by
consumers because there are many products with a higher price even more salable
because they are equivalent to the value, benefits and quality offered. Additionally,
Hermawan Kertajaya (in Arif Rahman, 2010: 149), president of the World Marketing
Association and founder Markplus & Co. said that the price is positioning or image
positioning of a brand product and the perspective of the consumer against it so that
the company must be very careful in setting their selling price. Here are the results of
direct observation the researchers did on December 3 and January 4, 2016 to several
franchises in Jakarta related ABC syrup price comparison with its competitors.
6
Table 1. Syrup’s Price Comparison on 2016 at Several Franchises in DKI Jakarta area
Table 1 shows that the price of ABC syrup also has a quite far gap or
difference between highs and lows as well as greater than its main competitor, Marjan
syrup or other brands. This indicates the unfavorable perception related to the value,
benefits and quality that will be obtained by the consumer as well as positioning
obscurity due to the instability of the price level ABC syrup. The price difference is
small or the prices tend to be stable indicates that the product has the positioning in
terms of price is clearly in accordance with the value, benefits and quality of products
offered.
Advertisement is a form of non-individual communication through various
media by the company (Cahyono, 2005: 149). Ads also one of the most important
component in marketing activities, that is, when a product is introduced and
stimulated to consumers continuously in order to create an attraction that led to the
purchase decision and did not rule on the other consumers of the product
(Ramadhani, 2012: 2). Currently, the criterion of a product’s ads that is appealing and
Tabel I.1Perbandingan Harga Sirup Tahun 2016 di Beberapa Waralaba di Wilayah DKI Jakarta
Alfamidi Indomaret HERO Supermarket Transmart Carrefour Food Hall Farmers 99 Market SuperindoKramat asem Utan Kayu Utara 1 Bronbek Kramat asem Pondok Indah Cempaka Putih Kelapa Gading Kelapa gading Pulomas
Syrup - 17,500.00Rp 23,800.00Rp 19,200.00Rp 18,500.00Rp 17,500.00Rp 20,200.00Rp 19,450.00Rp 20,090.00Rp 19,530.00RpSquash 13,500.00Rp - 16,200.00Rp - 12,800.00Rp 11,700.00Rp 12,200.00Rp 13,250.00Rp - 13,275.00RpSyrup 21,500.00Rp 22,000.00Rp 19,700.00Rp 19,300.00Rp 20,500.00Rp 20,700.00Rp 21,100.00Rp 20,250.00Rp 21,190.00Rp 20,693.33Rp
Squash - - 14,200.00Rp 13,200.00Rp 11,800.00Rp 11,700.00Rp - 11,950.00Rp 12,190.00Rp 12,506.67RpPohon Pinang Syrup 25,000.00Rp 25,000.00Rp - 21,850.00Rp - 23,900.00Rp - 22,700.00Rp 22,590.00Rp 23,506.67Rp
Syrup - - - - - 17,300.00Rp - 18,000.00Rp 17,290.00Rp 17,530.00RpSquash - - - 11,500.00Rp - - - 11,250.00Rp - 11,375.00Rp
Tjampolay Syrup - - - - 31,000.00Rp - - 35,900.00Rp 33,490.00Rp 33,463.33RpSarang Tawon Syrup 21,000.00Rp - - - - 20,938.00Rp - 29,000.00Rp - 23,646.00Rp
D'Fresh Syrup - - - - - 18,900.00Rp 28,400.00Rp - 27,490.00Rp 24,930.00RpKurnia Syrup 17,500.00Rp - 20,800.00Rp - - - - 19,750.00Rp - 19,350.00Rp
Buanasari Syrup - - - - 15,435.00Rp - - - 15,435.00RpGK Syrup - 32,000.00Rp 35,500.00Rp - - 34,375.00Rp - - - 33,958.33Rp
Sunquick Syrup 26,500.00Rp - - - - - - 27,090.00Rp 26,795.00RpTropicana Slim Syrup - - - - 27,500.00Rp 28,200.00Rp 31,800.00Rp 31,300.00Rp 30,190.00Rp 29,798.00Rp
Bangau Syrup - - 16,600.00Rp - - - - - - 16,600.00RpKencana Syrup - - - - - - - - 25,290.00Rp 25,290.00RpAlfamart Syrup 14,900.00Rp 14,900.00Rp - - - - - - - 14,900.00Rp
Squash 9,900.00Rp 9,900.00Rp - - - - - - - 9,900.00RpIndomaret Syrup - - - 15,500.00Rp - - - - - 15,500.00Rp
Squash - - - 10,500.00Rp - - - - - 10,500.00RpSuperindo 365 Syrup - - - - - - - - 15,190.00Rp 15,190.00Rp
Sumber : Data diolah oleh penulis
Harga Rata-Rata
ABC
Marjan
Indofood Freiss
AlfamartWaralaba
Merek Jenis
7
innovative turns out no longer just limited to the introduction of the advantages of the
product and the benefits of consumption only for consumers, but there is also a moral
life and creativity of processing cinematography from the company that is interesting
or eye catching for the consumer so that they buy the product. In the syrup industry
itself, media crowded used to advertise is television or commercial television
advertising. It is unfortunate that the advertisement of ABC syrup tends monotone or
in other words there are a further creativity and innovation. Moreover, the eve of holy
month of Ramadan which is supposed to focus on sales and promotions including
television commercial ad serving very intensively conducted, ABC syrup ad
packaging or presentation has a fairly mediocre compared with its main competitors,
Marjan syrup.
Picture 6. Pendapat Konsumen Sirup Mengenai Iklan Sirup MarjanSource: Kaskus (2015)
As seen in picture 6 above that Marjan syrup’s advertisement contains its own
positive association in the minds of consumers due to its late-typical. The more
interesting and innovative advertisement form and packaging than ABC syrup ads is
not impossible to contain their linkages with declining consumer preferences in
purchasing decisions on brand of ABC syrup.
Problem Formulation
The formulation of the problem in this study are as follows:
1. How does the description of the perceived price, advertisement and
purchase decision of ABC syrup?
2. Is the perceived price influence on purchase decisions of ABC syrup?
8
3. Is the advertisement influence on purchase decisions of ABC syrup?
Tujuan Penelitian
The goal of this research is as follows:
1. To find a description of the perceived price, advertisement and purchase
decisions of ABC syrup’s consumers.
2. To examine empirically the influence perceived price on purchase
decisions of ABC syrup’s consumers.
3. To examine empirically the influence of advertisement on purchase
decisions of ABC syrup’s consumers.
THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK
Perceived Price
According to Schiffman and Kanuk (in Harjati and Venice) (2015: 67)
perceived price is "view or perception regarding the price or how customers perceive
a certain price (high, low, normal) which gives a strong influence on purchase intent
and purchase satisfaction". Kotler and Keller (2012: 386) also stated that purchase
decisions based on how consumers look at the price and the actual price should be in
their assumption or not a price set by the marketer. Consumers also have a price limit
for a particular type of product which if below the lower limit may indicate that the
products are of inferior quality or less feasible and if high above the threshold
indicate that the price is too expensive or not worth bought at such price levels.
According to Kent B. Monroe (2003: 161) dimensions measured in perceived price
are the perceived quality and perceived monetary sacrificed.
Advertisement
Bearden et al (2007: 393) states that advertisement is a marketing
communication elements, which is persuasive, non-personal, paid by sponsors and
disseminated through mass communication channels to promote the use of goods or
9
services. Nonpersonal components include mass media advertisement like television
is much preferred by the national advertisers because it is very easy to see and the
ability to demonstrate something and can convey a message to a large group, often at
the same time (Novandri SN 2010: 20). Fandy Tjiptono (2008: 226) argues that
advertisement based on information about the advantages or benefits of products are
structured such that gave rise to the sense of fun that will change someone's mind for
the next purchase. The dimension of advertisement used in this research is an ad
measurement of the effect on consumers; message exposure, consumer attention,
message comprehension, message acceptance and message retention (Bearden, 2007:
399).
Purchase Decision
According Sutisna (2002: 15) the purchase decision is "making a purchase of
a product preceded by their awareness of fulfilling the needs and desires". Marslow
(in Kotler and Keller) (2012: 161) argues that a purchase decision originated from the
stimulus or influence marketing force against him until the purchase decisions of
consumers towards a product. Purchase decision is influenced by several factors
including the price and advertisement (Swastha and Handoko, 2000: 111). The
dimensions used in this research are the stages in the purchase decision process
proposed by Kotler and Keller (2012: 167-173), namely; the message exposure,
consumer attention, message comprehension, message acceptance and message
retention
The Research Model
Picture 7. The Research ModelSource: Data processed by the researcher
10
Hipotesis
Based on the formulation of the problem, theoretical studies and theoretical
framework that has been described, the hypothesis in this study are:
Hypothesis 1 : There is an influence of perceived price on purchase decision.
Hypothesis 2 : There is an influence of advertisement on purchase decision.
METODE PENELITIAN
The method used in this research is quantitative methods, the research
methods used to measure the data and typically uses some statistical analysis
(Malhotra, 2010: 141). This research uses descriptive and causal design, which
researchers will conduct testing of hypotheses, and the influence of the independent
variables on the dependent variable is the perceived price and advertisement on
purchase decisions (2010: 72). This research use a survey data collection method
which according to Naresh K. Malhotra (2010: 179) was conducted using structured
questionnaires were then given to a number of samples from a population and
designed to get more specific information from respondents. Based on the time
dimension, this study uses the cross-sectional studies, collecting data on
predetermined sample of population elements only once (2010: 76).
Populasi dan Sampel
The population used in this study is the inhabitants of Jakarta who ever make
purchases ABC syrup in minimarkets or supermarkets located in the DKI Jakarta
province within the last two years. The sampling method used in this research is
purposive sampling with a total of 200 respondents. The sample is limited to the
inhabitants of Jakarta who ever make purchases ABC syrup in minimarkets or
supermarkets located in the DKI Jakarta province within the last two years with hopes
that the sample criteria really meets the criteria according to research to be conducted.
11
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Description of Unit Data Analysis
Table 2. Characteristics of Respondents Based on Age and GenderGender
TotalMale Female
frequency percent frequency percent
Age
< 20 years 6 3.0% 17 8.5% 23
20-30 years 35 17.5% 66 33% 101
31-40 years 13 6.5% 29 14.5% 42
41-50 years 1 0.5% 20 10% 21
> 50 years 2 1% 11 5.5% 13
Total 57 28.5% 143 71.5% 200
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Based on the data presented in table 2, the majority of respondents in this
study is dominated by the female gender by the age of consent, which is 20 s / d 30
years amounted to 66 respondents or 33% of total respondents. The data imply that
the product ABC syrup is a product of household consumption, which is the area of
women adult buyer domination.
Table 3. Characteristics of Respondents by Gender and Job StatusGender
TotalMale Female
frequency percent frequency percent
JobStatus
Students 15 7.5% 18 9.0% 33
Employee 34 17.0% 67 33.5% 101
Entreprenuer 6 3.0% 14 7.0% 20
Housewife 0 0% 43 21.5% 43
Other, Teacher 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 2
Other, Retirement 1 0.5% 0 0% 1
Total 57 28.5% 143 71.5% 200
Source: Data processed by the researcher
12
The data in table 3 shows that the number of respondents by gender and
employment status are dominated by women whose status as an employee, as many
as 67 respondents, or by 33.5% of the total respondents. Not much different, with the
status of women respondents as housewives also quite a lot, which amounted to 43
people or 23.5% of total respondents. Based on these data, allegedly majority of
respondents have a major involvement of the purchase decision process ABC syrup
product which is a product of household consumption.
Table 4. Characteristics of Respondents by Monthly Expenses and Job Status
Status Pekerjaan
TotalStudent Employee Entrepreneur HousewifeOther,
TeacherOther,
Retirement
f % f % f % f % f % f %
MonthlyExpenses
< Rp 1.000.000,- 9 4.5% 7 3.5% 3 1.5% 3 1.5% 0 0% 0 0% 22
Rp 1.000.000,- s/dRp 3.000.000,- 23 11.5% 59 29.5% 7 3.5% 23 11.5% 1 0.5% 1 0.5% 114
Rp 3.000.001,- s/dRp 5.000.000,- 0 0% 21 10.5% 3 1.5% 13 6.5% 1 0.5% 0 0% 38
Rp 5.000.001,- s/dRp 8.000.000,- 1 0.5% 8 4% 5 2.5% 3 1.5% 0 0% 0 0% 17
> Rp 8.000.000,- 0 0% 6 3% 2 1% 1 0.5% 0 0% 0 0% 9
Total 33 16.5% 101 50.5% 20 10% 43 21.5% 2 1% 1 0.5% 200
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Based on data in Table 4, it can be said that most respondents in this research
work as employees with monthly expenses ranged between Rp 1.000.000,- s/d Rp
3.000.000,- as many as 59 respondents, or 29.5% of total respondents. This indicates
the possibility for the majority of respondents to do a tightly enough selection of a
product according to their needs.
13
Instrument Test
Validity Test
Table 5. Validity Test of Variabel Perceived Price (X1)
No. item statement r count r Table Information
1 0.809 0.361 valid2 0.747 0.361 valid3 0.710 0.361 valid4 0.547 0.361 valid5 0.513 0.361 valid6 0.586 0.361 valid
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Table 5 above shows the validity test results that have been done on the
variable perceived price. It can be concluded that all the items in the questionnaire
statement is valid because the value of rcount > rtable and significantly correlated. The
implication is that these items do not need to be removed or repaired and are
considered able to uncover something that would be measured by a questionnaire in
the study.
Table 6. Validity Test of Variable Advertisement (X2)No. item statement r count r table Information
7 0.497 0.361 valid8 0.644 0.361 valid9 0.701 0.361 valid
10 0.620 0.361 valid11 0.782 0.361 valid12 0.804 0.361 valid13 0.807 0.361 valid14 0.689 0.361 valid15 0.786 0.361 valid16 0.777 0.361 valid17 0.800 0.361 valid18 0.700 0.361 valid19 0.765 0.361 valid20 0.662 0.361 valid21 0.723 0.361 valid
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Table 6 above shows the validity test results that have been done on the
variable advertisement. It can be concluded that all the items in the questionnaire
statement is valid because the value of rcount > rtable and significantly correlated. The
14
implication is that these items do not need to be removed or repaired and are
considered able to uncover something that would be measured by a questionnaire in
the study.
Table 7. Validity Test of Variable Purchase Decision (Y)
No. item statement r count r table Information
22 0.634 0.361 valid23 0.577 0.361 valid24 0.570 0.361 valid25 0.748 0.361 valid26 0.664 0.361 valid27 0.512 0.361 valid28 0.668 0.361 valid29 0.801 0.361 valid30 0.723 0.361 valid31 0.835 0.361 valid32 0.921 0.361 valid33 0.852 0.361 valid34 0.844 0.361 valid35 0.803 0.361 valid
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Table 7 above shows the validity test results that have been done on the
variable purchase decision. It can be concluded that all the items in the questionnaire
statement is valid because the value of rcount > rtable and significantly correlated. The
implication is that these items do not need to be removed or repaired and are
considered able to uncover something that would be measured by a questionnaire in
the study.
Reliability Test
Table 8. Reliability Test
No VariablesNilai Cronbach’s
Alpha (α)Information
1 Perceived Price (X1) 0.726 Reliabel
2 Advertisement (X2) 0.930 Reliabel
3 Purchase Decision (Y) 0.927 Reliabel
Source: Data diolah oleh penulis
In Table 8 shows that all the variables tested in this study is reliable because
the value of Cronbach's Alpha (α) is greater than 0.60. Perceived price variable (X1)
15
has a value of alpha coefficient of 0726 indicating acceptable reliability. Variable
advertisement (X2) has a value of alpha coefficient of 0.930 indicating good
reliability. Meanwhile, the purchase decision as the dependent variable (Y) has a
coefficient alpha of 0927 which means that the reliability is good.
Basic Assumption Test
Normality Test
Table 9. Normality TestOne-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
PerceivedPrice Advertisement Purchase
DecisionN 200 200 200
Normal Parametersa,b Mean 22.58 53.34 48.26Std. Deviation 2.952 8.337 8.224
Most Extreme DifferencesAbsolute .093 .050 .069Positive .093 .046 .069Negative -.067 -.050 -.057
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.313 .713 .973Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .063 .690 .301a. Test distribution is Normal.b. Calculated from data.
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Based on data from Table 9 above regarding normality test One Sample
Kolmogorov - Smirnov were performed using SPSS software for Windows 20,
looked at four variables, namely; perceived price (X1) has a significance value of
0.063, Advertisement (X2) has the significance of 0.690, and the purchase decision
(Y) has a significance value of 0.301. The significant value of these three variables
exceeds 0.05, then it can be said these three variables’ data in the study has a normal
distribution.
According to Naresh K. Malhotra (2010: 237), a good regression model is a
model that has a good residual values normally distributed. In this study, test One
Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov can be used to test the residual value by correlating the
residual value (residual Unstandarized) with each of the variables using a significance
level of 5% or α = 0:05. Data are expressed in normal distribution if the significance
is greater than 0.05.
16
Table 10. Residual Normality TestOne-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
UnstandardizedResidual_1
UnstandardizedResidual_2
PurchaseDecision
N 200 200 200
Normal Parametersa,b Mean 0E-7 0E-7 48.26Std. Deviation 6.56347735 6.36192602 8.224
Most ExtremeDifferences
Absolute .041 .046 .069Positive .032 .032 .069Negative -.041 -.046 -.057
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .582 .651 .973Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .888 .790 .301a. Test distribution is Normal.b. Calculated from data.
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Based on data from Table 10, it can be looked at four variables, namely;
Unstandardized Residual_1 have a significance value 0888, 0790 unstandardized
Residual_2 significance, and purchasing decisions (Y) has a significance value of
0.301. The significant value of these three variables are greater than 0.05, then it can
be said these three variables’ data in the study with normal distribution.
Linearity Test
Table 11. Linearity Test
ANOVA Table
Sum ofSquares df Mean
Square F Sig.
Purchase Decision *Advertisement
BetweenGroups
(Combined) 7147.620 35 204.218 5.305 .000
Linearity 5406.134 1 5406.134 140.444 .000Deviationfrom Linearity 1741.486 34 51.220 1.331 .123
Within Groups 6312.860 164 38.493Total 13460.480 199
Source: Data processed by the researcher
ANOVA Table
Sum ofSquares df Mean
Square F Sig.
Purchase Decision *Perceived Price
BetweenGroups
(Combined) 6188.952 15 412.597 10.440 .000Linearity 4887.712 1 4887.712 123.680 .000Deviationfrom Linearity 1301.240 14 92.946 2.352 .005
Within Groups 7271.528 184 39.519Total 13460.480 199
17
The data in table 11 contains the results linearity test performed on
independent and dependent variables in this study. The test results of linearity
perceived price variable (X1) on purchase decisions (Y) indicates a value of 0.000 or
less than 0.05. This may indicate a linear relationship significantly in perceived price
variable (X1) on purchase decisions (Y). Further, test results of linearity between
advertisement variable (X2) on purchase decisions (Y) indicates a value of 0.000 or
less than 0.05. This may indicate a significant linear relationship to the variable
advertisement (X2) on purchase decisions (Y).
Multicolinearity Test
Table 12. Multicolinearity TestCoefficientsa
Model UnstandardizedCoefficients
StandardizedCoefficients
t Sig. Collinearity Statistics
B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF
1
(Constant) 2.385 3.395 .703 .483PersepsiHarga 1.019 .168 .366 6.067 .000 .703 1.422
Iklan .429 .060 .434 7.201 .000 .703 1.422a. Dependent Variable: Keputusan PembelianSource: Data processed by the researcher
Multicolinearity test results in table 12 shows the value of the independent
variable tolerance; perceived price (X1) and advertisement (X2) of 0703 or more than
0.1. Then, VIF value of the perceived price variable (X1) and advertisement, (X2) is
at 1,422. or less than 10. Under the terms free from multicolinearity of the foregoing,
it can be stated there is no multicollinearity in independent variables X1 and X2. The
implication is that there is no correlation or linear relationship between the two
independent variables.
18
Heterscedasticity Test
Table 13. Heterscedasticity Test
Coefficientsa
Model UnstandardizedCoefficients
StandardizedCoefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1(Constant) 3.348 2.156 1.553 .122Persepsi Harga .155 .107 .123 1.453 .148Iklan -.044 .038 -.099 -1.175 .241
a. Dependent Variable: RES4Source: Data processed by the researcher
The results in table 13 above shows the significant value of the perceived
price variable (X1) is for 0148 and the advertisement (X2) of 0241. Both independent
variables have a significance value greater than 0.05 which means there are no
symptoms of heteroscedasticity in X1 and X2 data.
Analisis Regresi Linear Berganda
t-Test
Table 14. t-Test The Influence of Perceived Price and Advertisement on Purchase Decision ofABC SyrupCoefficientsa
Model UnstandardizedCoefficients
StandardizedCoefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1(Constant) 2.385 3.395 .703 .483Persepsi Harga 1.019 .168 .366 6.067 .000Iklan .429 .060 .434 7.201 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Keputusan PembelianSource: Data processed by the researcher
Based on t test in Table 14, the variable perceived price (X1) has a
significance value of tcount of 0000 or smaller than the significance level was set at
5% (α = 0.05), and tcount of 6,067 or greater than ttable which is equal to 1,972. This
means that Ho is rejected and Ha accepted. The implication is that the perceived
price had partial significant influence on purchase decisions ABC syrup.
Furthermore, advertisement variable (X2) have a significance value of tcount of 0000
or smaller than the significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05), and tcount of 7,201 or
19
larger than the TTable which amounted to 1,972. This means that Ho is rejected and
Ha accepted. The implication is that the ad had partial significant influence on
purchase decisions ABC syrup.
Multiple Regression Equation
The regression equation that can be made based on Table 14 are as follows:
Y = a + bX1 + bX2
Y = 2.385 + 1.019X1 + 0.429X2
Information:
Y = Purchase Decision
a = Constant
b = Regression Coefficients
X1 = Perceived Price
X2 = Advertisement
A constant value of 2.385 indicates if the perceived price variable (X1) and
advertising (X2) is 0, then the purchasing decisions (Y) will be valued at 2.385.
Regression coefficient value perceived price variable (X1) of 1.019 indicates
if the perceived price variable (X1) increased one unit and the values of
advertisement (X2) variable is steady, then the purchase decision variable (Y) will be
increased by 1,019. The coefficient is positive, meaning a positive influence between
perceived price variable (X1) and the purchase decision variable (Y).
Regression coefficient value advertisement (X2) of 0.429 indicates if the
variable advertisement (X2) increased the one unit and the values of perceived price
variable (X1) is steady, then the purchase decision variable (Y) will increase by 0429.
The coefficient is positive, meaning a positive influence between advertisement
variable (X2) and the purchase decision variable (Y).
20
F Test
Table 15. F Test The Influence of Perceived Price and Advertisement on PurchaseDecision of ABC Syrup
ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1
Regression 6674.173 2 3337.086 96.872 .000b
Residual 6786.307 197 34.448
Total 13460.480 199a. Dependent Variable: Keputusan Pembelianb. Predictors: (Constant), Iklan, Persepsi Harga
Source: Data processed by the researcher
F test results in Table 15 shows that the value of Fcount significance is 0000 or
smaller than the significance level was set at 5% (α = 0.05). Furthermore, the value of
Fcount is 96.872 or greater than Ftable which amounted to 3,042. This means the
perceived price and advertisement has a significant influence jointly on purchase
decisions ABC syrup.
Determination Coefficients
Table 16. Determination Analysis The Influence of Perceived Price and Advertisement onPurchase Decision of ABC Syrup
Model SummaryModel R R Square Adjusted R
SquareStd. Error of the
Estimate1 .704a .496 .491 5.869a. Predictors: (Constant), Iklan, Persepsi Harga
Source: Data processed by the researcher
Based on the results in Table 16, the value of R2 (Adjusted R square) is 0.491,
or 49.1%. This value explains that the variation of the independent variables used in
the model, perceived price (X1) and advertisement (X2) are able to explain amounted
to 49.1% of the variation in the dependent variable, purchase decision (Y). While the
remaining 50.9% is explained by other variables that is not included in this research
model such as brand image, product quality, distribution channels and promotion.
21
KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
Kesimpulan
After testing the primary data on the influence of the perceived price and
advertisement on purchase decisions, it can be concluded as follows:
1. The first hypothesis that shows there are significant influence of perceived
price variable on purchase decision is accepted because it has value of tcount
6,067 > ttable 1,972 and significancy value of 0000 < 5% (α = 0.05). These
results support a previous study conducted by Azhar Ahmad, Sallehuddin
Mohd Noor Che Che Aniza Wel (2014) who found that the perceived price
significantly influence purchasing decisions.
2. The second hypothesis that shows there are significant perceived price
variable to the purchasing decision is accepted because it has value of tcount
7,021 > ttable 1,972 and significancy value of 0000 <5% (α = 0.05). These
results support a previous study conducted by Anwar Nuris, Muslichah Erma
Widiana and Susi Tri Wahyu (2015) who found that advertisement have a
significant influence on purchasing decisions.
Suggestions
The company PT Heinz ABC Indonesia can create a more attractive tvc
advertisement ABC syrup than other syrup brand advertisement to get more attention
of potential customers. In addition, ABC syrup advertisement must also may affect
consumers in the process of needs recognition to consume syrup ABC after watching
and can also always be remembered emotionally by consumers then foster a sense of
repurchase the ABC syrup product.
The company PT Heinz ABC Indonesia is also expected to improve their
product quality to a better suit consumer tastes than other syrup brands. No less
important, the company also expected to formulate a better marketing strategy for
ABC syrup to foster consumer satisfaction and confidence in order to do a better
recommendation of ABC syrup product to other consumers.
22
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Ahmad, Azhar, Sallehuddin Mohd Noor dan Che Aniza Che Wel. Factors Influencing
Consumers’ Purchase Decision of Private Label Brand Products, International
Journal of Economic Practices and Theories, Special issue on Marketing and
Business Development. 2014, 4, 2, hal. 101-110.
Bearden, William O., et al. Marketing Principles and Perspectives, 4th ed. New York:
MCGrawhill, 2007.
Cahyono, Dwi. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan pembelian
minuman air mineral Aqua (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Universitas Sebelas
Maret Surakarta). Skripsi Sarjana (Tidak Diterbitkan). Surakarta: Fakultas
Ekonomi Universitas Surakarta, 2005.
Harjati, Lily dan Yurike Venesia. Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan dan Persepsi Harga
terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan pada Maskapai Penerbangan Tiger Air
Mandala. E-Journal WIDYA Ekonomika. Oktober 2015, 1, 1, hal. 64-74.
Kotler, Philip dan Kevin Lane Keller. Marketing Management, Global 14th ed.
England: PEARSON Education Limited, 2012.
Malhotra, Naresh K. Marketing Research An Applied Orientation, 6th ed. New Jersey:
PEARSON Prentice Hall, 2010.
Monroe, Kent B.. Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 3rd ed. Boston: McGraw-
Hill/Irwin, 2003.
Novandri SN, Made. Analisis Pengaruh Produk, Harga, dan Iklan Terhadap
Keputusan Pembelian Sepeda Motor Yamaha Pada Harpindo Jaya Cabang
Ngaliyan. Skripsi Sarjana (Tidak diterbitkan). Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Diponegoro, 2010.
Nuris, Anwar, Muslichah Erma Widiana dan Susi Tri Wahyuni. Pengaruh Harga,
Citra Produk dan Iklan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Pada Mie Instan
Indomie di Kecamatan Jambangan Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen
BRANCHMARK. Februari 2015, hal. 63-77.
23
Rahman, Arif. Rockin’ Ur Retail Business Modern Retail Handbook @small
business. Yogyakarta: ANDI, 2010.
Ramadhani, Fidiah. Pengaruh Variabel Harga, Iklan dan Kualitas Terhadap
Keputusan Pembelian Minuman Kemasan Merek “Teh Botol Sosro” di Desa
Somoroto Kecamatan Kauman Kabupaten Ponorogo. Skripsi Sarjana (Tidak
diterbitkan). Ponorogo: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhamadiyah
Ponorogo, 2012.
Sutisna. Perilaku Konsumen dan Komunikasi Pemasaran. Bandung: PT Remaja
Rosda Karya, 2002.
Swastha dan Handoko. Manajemen Pemasaran Analisis Perilaku Konsumen.
Yogyakarta: BPFE, 2000.
Tjiptono, Fandy. Pemasaran Jasa. 1st ed. Jakarta: Banyumedia Publishing, 2008.
Answer, Yahoo!. Pilih sirup marjan ato sirup ABC,bwt hidangan lebaran esok?. 2012.
https://id.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120816010006AAwmZt
4. (Diakses pada tanggal 19 Juli 2016)
. Lebih suka sirup marjan atau sirip ABC?. 2013.
https://id.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20130623013245AAGjw40
&page=2. (Diakses pada tanggal 19 Juli 2016)
Group, Frontier Consulting. Memanfaatkan Peluang Perubahan Perilaku Musiman
Konsumen. 2014. http://www.frontier.co.id/memanfaatkan-peluang-
perubahan-perilaku-musiman-konsumen.html. (Diakses tanggal 16 Desember
2015).
Kaskus. Belanja iklan sirup Marjan capai setengah triliun pada bulan puasa. 2015.
http://www.kaskus.co.id/thread/55acbe1bd89b0917758b4568/belanja-iklan-
sirup-marjan-capai-setengah-triliun-pada-bulan-puasa/5. (Diakses pada
tanggal 19 Juli 2016)