Non-invasive techniques in diagnosis of endometriosis: A ...

ISSN 2394-7330

International Journal of Novel Research in Healthcare and Nursing Vol. 7, Issue 2, pp: (223-234), Month: May - August 2020, Available at: www.noveltyjournals.com

Page | 223 Novelty Journals

Non-invasive techniques in diagnosis of

endometriosis: A critical review

Maged MN1, Mohamed MN

2, Lamia H. Sh

3

Mazahmiya Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 1, Department of General Surgery, King Fahd

Hospital, Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Department of Surgery, Consultant Endoscopic Surgery,

Department of Radiology , Riyadh National hospital .

Abstract: About 10% of ladies of reproductive age experience the ill effects of endometriosis, an expensive chronic

disease a causing pelvic pain and subfertility. Laparoscopy is the best quality level demonstrative test for

endometriosis, however is costly and conveys careful dangers. At present, there are no non‐invasive tests accessible

in clinical practice to precisely analyze endometriosis. This review evaluated the distinctive non‐invasive modalities

for endometriosis.

Keywords: (endometriosis, ultrasound, MRI, CT, biomarkers).

1. INTRODUCTION

Background

Endometriosis is characterized as the nearness of practical endometrial organs and stroma outside the uterine cavity and

myometrium . Endometriosis is related with a range of imaging discoveries extending from minute inserts to a central

cystic assortment that is alluded to as an "endometrioma" or "endometriotic cyst" In spite of the fact that the

demonstrative best quality level remains laparoscopy, indicative imagers are regularly approached to assess for

endometriosis in a patient with pelvic agony or fruitlessness and to think about an endometrioma in the assessment of an

adnexal mass. Despite the fact that the ovary is the most widely recognized site of contribution, endometriosis may

happen in different destinations and can mirror other sickness forms, both clinically and at imaging.

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

Endometriosis is found prevalently in ladies of childbearing age and is assessed to influence around 5–10% of the female

populace.

There are a few speculations of the pathogenesis of endometriosis; nonetheless, the most generally acknowledged is the

metastatic hypothesis, which holds that endometrial cells and stroma embed in ectopic areas inside the pelvis, in all

likelihood auxiliary to retrograde period . Once shipped, the endometrial cells embed on the serosal surfaces and stay

feasible.

The coelomic hypothesis, which expresses that endometriosis creates from metaplastic change of cells coating the pelvic

peritoneum since both endometrial and peritoneal cells get from the coelomic divider epithelium. The most widely

recognized locales of inclusion by endometriosis are the ovaries, uterine tendons, pelvic parkway, pelvic peritoneum,

fallopian tubes, rectosigmoid colon, and bladder. Spread to progressively far off locales may happen by lymphatic or

hematogenous routes or iatrogenically during medical procedure or needle biopsy (1)

ISSN 2394-7330



Imaging modalities

Ultrasound

The principle difficulties of imaging for endometriosis are the location of non-ovarian illness and the assessment of the

augmentation of the sickness into pelvic structures (2)

The essential job of ultrasonography in the determination of endometriosis is to tailor the patient's administration. A right

mapping of endometriotic injuries may caution the specialist on the nearness of lesions that are not promptly obvious at

laparoscopy (for example rectovaginal septum or vaginal wall knobs). Specifically, the specific confinement and degree

of profound penetrating endometriosis is of significance in the arranging of the sort and level of trouble of a surgery. For

example, if there should arise an occurrence of bowel wall invasion or association of the ureter, broad medical procedure

is to be envisioned and the lady is to be informed .

Superficial peritoneal endometrioses such as peritoneal blebs and ‗gunshot‘ lesions are too small to be detected at

ultrasound examination. At most, site specific tenderness or reduced organ sliding during vaginal scanning may give a

hint as to the presence of active peritoneal endometriosis, adhesions or fibrosis. Site-specific tenderness, reduced ovarian

mobility and the presence of loculated peritoneal fluid in the pelvis, are called ‗soft markers‘ for pelvic pathology,

including superficial endometriosis (3)

The accuracy of ultrasound, however, is largely dependent on the operators, on their knowledge of the disease, and on the

techniques they use to perform the examination. (4)

The key steps for a correct assessment of the pelvis have previously well reported, first, all patients should be examined

systematically and carefully using an endocavitary sonography, with a microconvex array probe inserted transvaginally or

transrectally, both techniques are optimal approaches for examining uterus (including the different uterine zones: cervix,

endometrium, junctional zone, and myometrium), adnexa, paracolpium, parametrium, vesicocervical, vesicovaginal, and

rectovaginalspaces as well as urinary bladder, ureters, and rectum. (5)

Second, in order to ensure that no pathology is overlooked in the lower pelvic (e.g., a nodule in the rectovaginal

septum or vaginal pathology), it is important to begin the transvaginal , by gynecologic examination by looking at the

structures at the point of insertion into the vagina, so that, in addition to the actual vagina, the urethra, the anorectal canal,

and the perineum as a whole can be studied , then, having gently introduced the transvaginal probe, cervix, uterus, adnexa,

and all other pelvic structures can be assessed. (6)

Three types of endometriosis are generally described: peritoneal, ovarian and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE), with

the latter being defined as the infiltration of endometrial deposits of ≥5mm into surrounding tissue , the areas most

commonly affected include the uterosacral ligaments (USL), recto-sigmoid colon, recto-vaginal septum (RVS), vagina

and bladder. (7)

The precision of ultrasound, notwithstanding, is to a great extent reliant on the operators, on their insight into the

tenderness , and on the techniques they used to perform the examination. (4)

The key strides for a right evaluation of the pelvis have beforehand very much details, First, all patients ought to be

analyzed efficiently and cautiously utilizing an endocavitary sonography, with a micro convex array probe embedded

transvaginally or then again transrectally. The two procedures are ideal methodologies for looking at uterus ( including

different uterine zones: cervix, endometrium, junctional zone, and myometrium), adnexa, paracolpium, parametrium,

vesicocervical, vesicovaginal, and rectovaginal spaces just as urinary bladder, ureters, and rectum (5)

Second, all together to guarantee that no pathology is ignored in the lower pelvis (e.g., a knob in the rectovaginal septum

or vaginal pathology), it is essential to start the transvaginal gynecologic assessment by taking a gander at the structures at

the purpose of addition into the vagina, so that, notwithstanding the actual vagina, the urethra, the anorectal canal , and the

perineum all in all can be considered. At that point, having tenderly presented the transvaginal probe , cervix, uterus,

adnexa, and the various pelvic structures can be assessed. (6)

Three sorts of endometriosis are commonly portrayed: peritoneal, ovarian and profound penetrating endometriosis , with

the last being characterized as the invasion of endometrial stores of ≥5mm into encompassing tissue. The areas most

commonly influenced incorporate the uterosacral ligament (USL), recto-sigmoid colon, recto-vaginal septum (RVS),

vagina and bladder. (7)

ISSN 2394-7330



The symptoms of endometriosis depend are dependant upon the location of the disease anyway,dysmenorrheal, incessant

pelvic agony, profound dyspareunia, weakness, and subfertility keep on being the main symptoms.(8) , RVS is associated

with increasingly extreme types of dyschezia and dyspareunia(9) and Pass on including the urinary tract can give

recurrence, nocturia, bladder spasms and hematuria.(10)

Postponement in the finding of endometriosis despite everything stays an issue, with a detailed interim from introductory

protest to determination differing from 7.96 to 11.73years.(11), An assortment of analytic techniques have been assessed

in the course of recent decades in diagnosing DIE (Deeply infiltrating endometriosis) , for example, transvaginal

ultrasound (TVS), MRI, transrectal ultrasound, anyway conclusive analysis is still regularly just made at laparoscopy.(12-

16) There is a wide assortment of treatment choices accessible running from ovarian supression utilizing hormonal agents

to radical medical procedure. In DIE the viability of clinical treatment is frequently imperfect, with high repeat rates on

suspension of treatment(17-18) and in such cases many advocate the utilization of progressively radical careful excision.

Debate and controversy still exists as to how radical surgery should be when excising DIE and its long-term benefits and

complications.

Among imaging modalities, MRI is frequently utilized as a critical thinking extra assessment in complex cases and ought

to be considered as a second-line procedure after ultrasound (US) (19). Presently, MRI is viewed as the best imaging

method for mapping endometriosis, since it gives a more dependable guide of profound invading endometriosis than

physical assessment and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) (20).

MRI

The primary locations of endometriosis are in the pelvis: on the ovaries, uterus, fallopian tubes, uterosacral ligaments

(USL), and broad ligaments, round ligaments, cul-de-sac, rectosigmoid colon, bladder, ureters, and rectovaginal septum

(RVS) (21).

Women with peritoneal endometriosis can be asymptomatic; on the other hand deep pelvic endometriosis is frequently

associated with pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, urinary tract symptoms, and infertility (22).

Pelvic pain may be chronic rather than cyclic,through enriched sensory innervation of endometriotic lesions which play a

key role in hyperalgesia and pain generation. In deep infiltrating lesions the nerve fiber density is higher than in peritoneal

and ovarian ones; in particular, deep infiltrating lesions involving the bowel are the most densely innervated of all lesion

types, which correlates with the high incidence of patient-reported pain ([23) ,and the intensity of the pain is proportional

to the depth to which the lesions penetrate (24); nevertheless, in many cases the extent of endometriotic lesions does not

correlate with the severity of symptoms (25).

Computed tomography

CT can assess the thickness of the wall ; it can't recognize different delicate tissues. Likewise, separating and depicting

the pelvic organs and their lesions, is troublesome. Processed tomographic colonography is another indicative strategy

used to decide if lesions have attacked the gut. It permits assessments other than those offered by conventional

colonoscopy, with perspectives on the sub mucosa and serosa (26),

With this procedure, an enormous obstetric tampon is embedded into the vagina and a Foley catheter discharging CO2 is

set in the rectum. The whole pelvis is then examined. This technique is quick (around 20 minutes), non-obtrusive and

requires no sedation. The great advantage lies in the CO2 insufflation, which allows various assessments to be made of

the inside, urinary tract and retroperitoneal districts. Suitable for young ladies, this method has the advantage of

maintaining a strategic distance from high dosages of radiation while experiencing total assessment in one single

evaluation (27). recently, registered tomography bowel enema has been utilized to recognize multifocal lesions

(numerous endometriotic injuries influencing a similar portion) or multicentric lesions (endometriotic lesions influencing

various sections of the digestive tract); however, results stay questionable. to assesse the commitment of registered

tomography enema and MRI imaging for the analysis of multifocal or multicentric lisions of endometriosis in the bowel,

In spite of the fact that exactness was high with the two strategies, it was presumed that the evaluation of these

procedures stays restricted when multifocality or multicentricity is under scrutiny (28).

ISSN 2394-7330



Biomarkers

As per the " embryonic theory " or epigenetic hypothesis, during organogenesis, the qualities of the Home box and

Wingless family are fundamental for the differentiation of the anatomical structures of the urogenital tract. Any

dysregulation of these genes through the Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway will lead to various anomelies and may cause

aberrant placement of the stem cells. The abnormal placement of these cells, associated with immune alterations and the

pro-inflammatory peritoneal environment, will determine the progression towards endometriosis (29).

An ectopic endometrium displays a distinctive epigenetic expression profile, which involves homeobox A (HOXA)

clusters and Wnt signaling pathway genes (30). Besides, miRNAs dysregulations were found to modulate the

proliferation and invasiveness of ectopic endometrial cells, with attention to that dysregulation of miR-200b family

influences the separation of ectopic cells by directing epithelial-to-mesenchymal progress. In addition, epigenetics

assumes a significant recruitment and differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells by modulating the relationship

between the inflammatory microenvironment and steroid action. This interaction represents the trigger for the recruitment

of bone marrow-derived stem cells, and it is highly influenced by the epigenetic expression profile (31).

Endometriosis is considered an inflammatory disease, due to increased levels of activated macrophages and cytokines

such as interleukins (IL-6, IL-8, IIL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and macrophage migration inhibitory

factor (MIF), in the peritoneal fluid of affected women (32). Furthermore, several inflammatory biomarkers registered

increased levels in the serum of endometriotic women: C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-4, TNF-α, monocyte chemoattractant

protein-1 (MCP-1), IL-6, IL-8, and regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) (33).

2. DISCUSSION

Assessment of the anterior pelvic compartment

Bladder and ureteric DIE is a basic segment of the ultrasound work up for ladies with suspected endometriosis, 53% of

ladies giving DIE had urinary tract endometriosis.(34) Bladder DIE tends to be suggestive, while ureteric DIE can be

clinically "quiet", prompting ureteric impediment and in the end renal failure. In this way, the capacity to distinguish

urinary tract DIE pre-operatively isn't just basic for careful arranging (for example inclusion of a urologist), yet in

addition for the avoidance of renal failure, the bladder is the most usually influenced site for urinary tract DIE, with 11%

of ladies with DIE showing bladder lisions. (35)

Bladder DIE frequently happens with other DIE lisions ; the analysts showed that 64% of ladies with bladder DIE had an

existing together posterior compartment DIE nodule (for example bowel, USL, vagina, ureter).(36)

Along with dysmenorrhea, indications, for example, dysuria and hematuria may likewise be present in ladies with bladder

DIE. Bladder DIE is most easily identified related to TVU when the bladder is at any rate incompletely full, making an

acoustic window and taking into consideration perception of the bladder wall, and the most regular area for bladder DIE is

inside the muscularis layer of the back bladder wall,with Studies assessing TVU for the identification of ureteric DIE are

scant, along these lines the precision.

what's more, unwavering quality of TVU for the expectation of ureteric DIE isn't settled, the affectability, particularity,

positive prescient worth (PPV) and negative prescient worth (NPV) for ureteric endometriosis influencing the privilege

and left pelvic ureter to be 62 and 69%, 98 and 96%, 80 and 73%, 95 and 94%, respectively.(37)

The analysts suggested that extrinsic ureteric disease ought to be considered in instances of DIE nodule invadinging the

parametria (characterized as the stringy tissue that lies before the cervix and expands along the side between the layers of

the broad ligament and USL.

Ureteric inclusion was available in 65% of ladies with urinary tract endometriosis. (38) Importantly, 12/17 (59%) ladies

with urinary tract endometriosis additionally had proof of hydronephrosis. The TVU determination of ureteric DIE had an

affectability of 92% (95%CI, 63.9 – 99.8), particularity 100% (95% CI, 97.6 – 100%), PPV 100% (95% CI, 73.5 –

100%), NPV 99.3% (95% CI, 96.3 – 99.9%), and negative probability proportion (LR-) 0.08 (95% CI, 0.01 – 0.39).

Enthusiastically, this investigation announced that assessment of the urinary tract for DIE just added an extra 5 minutes to

the pelvic ultrasound appraisal. It ought to be noted in any case, that the inspectors engaged with this investigation were

ISSN 2394-7330



TVU was utilized to anticipate of utero-vesical bonds/front circular drive experienced ultrasound administrators and the

recognizable proof of the distal ureters with TVU requires some level of specific preparing. Given the desperate results

related with urinary tract check it is sensible to suggest that ladies with suspected endometriosis have a TVU evaluation of

the urinary tract, or possibly a renal ultrasound to evaluate for conceivable hydronephrosis. Bonds between the back

bladder and the lower uterine fragment can bring about foremost cul de sac oblitrationt, expanding the multifaceted nature

of gynecological medical procedure, destruction in ladies with past cesarean section. (39)

The analysts utilized the TVU "sliding sign" strategy to survey regardless of whether the posterior bladder floated easily

over the lower front uterus. In the event that the posterior bladder didn't float easily over the foremost uterus, the "sliding

sign" was considered negative, and the anterior cul-de-sac was recorded as obliterated. The study found that 27% of

women with a previous cesarean section had utero-vesical adhesions. Furthermore, anterior compartment anterior

compartment adhesions were found to be significantly associated with a history of chronic pelvic pain. The "sliding sign"

may hence be helpful in evaluating the danger of bladder adhesions for ladies with ceaseless pelvic agony/suspected

endometriosis. Further examinations are expected to affirm the connection between the "sliding sign" and utero- vesical

attachments, and whether a negative bladder "sliding sign" may likewise be related with endometriosis (39) assessment of

the posterior pelvic compartment

The precision of TVU for the forecast of bowel (rectal/rectosigmoid) DIE has been settled and TVU is creating

acknowledgment as a first line imaging methodology for the evaluation of pelvic DIE.(40)

Modified TVU strategies which use free liquid (for example saline(41), water(42) or gel(43)) in the rectum or vagina to

make an acoustic window have likewise been assessed with an end goal to improve the expectation of posterior

compartment DIE, as of late played out an orderly survey which included 19 forthcoming and review studies, and there

was no noteworthy distinction between the exactness of TVU versus altered TVU strategies for the forecast of bowel DIE.

The general pooled affectability, explicitness, LR+ and LR‐ for the conclusion of bowel DIE was 91 % (95 % CI, 85‐

94%), 98 % (95 % CI, 96%‐99%), 38.4 (95% CI, 20.2‐73.1) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06‐0.16), respectively. (3) There was

considerable heterogeneity among the specialists suggested that a worldwide accord on ultrasound classification for ladies

with potential endometriosis is required to take into consideration improvement in future imminent investigations.

As to the TVU evaluation for bowel wall penetration, past examinations have shown that in spite of the fact that TVU has

a high precision for the discovery of DIE injuries influencing the muscularis layer, TVU isn't as valuable for the

expectation of sub mucosal/mucosal invasion. TVU for the expectation of invasion of sub mucosal/mucosal layer was

improved when inside arrangement was utilized, exhibiting the accompanying affectability, particularity, PPV and NPV:

83% (95% CI, 66.5-93%),94% (95% CI, 88.1-96.9%), 77% (95% CI, 60.3-88.3%), and 96% (95% CI, 90.6-98.3%),

respectively.(44)

In another examination , the specialists found that TVU with water-contrast in the rectum was comprable to barium

enema for the location of intestinal stenosis, with an a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for BE versus RWC-TVS of

93.7% versus 87.5%, 94.2% versus 91.4%, 88.2% versus 82.3%, and 97% versus 94.1%, respectively.(45)

Pre-operative TVU is helpful for chracterizing the size, number and area of rectal/recto sigmoid DIE injuries; be that as it

may, the choice to perform inside resection is regularly made at the hour of medical procedure by the colorectal specialist,

and isn't commonly founded on the TVU report.

Another fundamental part in the TVU appraisal for ladies with suspected endometriosis is the "sliding sign" for

expectation of POD annihilation. Ladies with POD destruction at medical procedure are three times bound to have

simultaneous rectal DIE and require bowel surgery (46); hence identification of ladies with POD oblitration

preoperatively makes the specialist aware of the expanded risk of rectal DIE.

So as to assess the "sliding sign", the analyst places one hand over the lower abdominal wall and delicately voting forms

the uterine fundus between this hand and the transvaginal test to decide if the rectosigmoid bowel coasts easily over the

back uterine fundus (PUF). Next, the analyst decides if the front rectum floats easily over the posterior cervix by putting

delicate pressure against the retro cervix (RC) with the transvaginal probe. On the off chance that the two regions display

smooth skimming, the ―sliding sign‖ is considered positive and the POD is deemed not obliterated. If at either location

ISSN 2394-7330



(i.e. PUF/RC) the bowel does not glide smoothly, the ―sliding sign‖ is considered negative for that region and POD is

deemed obliterated. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+ and LR- of the ―sliding sign‖ for the

prediction of POD obliteration was recently demonstrated to be 95%, 85%, 98%, 93%, 95%, 40.3, and 0.15, respectively.

(47)

The ability to predict rectal/rectosigmoid DIE and POD obliteration with TVU depends upon specialized TVU training

and operator experience, performed a learning curve study, for the TVU diagnosis of bowel DIE and POD obliteration

and found that after a short training period, experienced gynecological sonologists (who have performed in excess of

2,500 scans)andneed to perform ~40 scans to reach competency.(48)

In another study, competency for theTVU diagnosis of bowel DIE and POD obliteration was achieved after 36 scans and

38 scans .(49)

In terms of the reproducibility of TVU for the prediction of bowel DIE, recently demonstrated a high inter-observer

agreement between two experienced gynecological sinologists for the prediction of vaginal, bladder, USL and bowel DIE.

(50)

The inter-/intra-observer reproducibility of the ―sliding sign‖ for the prediction of POD obliteration has also been assessed

in a study where TVU videos of the ―sliding sign‖ were reviewed by four gynecological sinologists and two maternal fetal

medicine specialists,the gynecological sinologists had an altogether higher exactness and bury/intra-spectator

understanding for translation of the "sliding sign" than different observers, demonstrating that gynecological ultrasound

experience assumes a significant job in the capacity to foresee POD devastation with TVU. Studies have likewise

exhibited that spectators are more steady with anticipating the TVU "sliding sign" at the RC than at the PUF.

Notwithstanding a negative "sliding sign", ultrasound highlights, for example, ovarian endometrioma, furthermore,

ovarian fixation have additionally been exhibited to be altogether connected with POD demolition, one-sided and two-

sided ovarian endometrioma were fundamentally connected with POD oblitration at laparoscopy, be that as it may, this

was just the situation if inside DIE was available. One-sided and reciprocal ovarian fixation was likewise altogether

connected with POD obliteration at laparoscopy.

The "sliding sign" gives off an impression of being a handily learned, precise and reproducible ultrasound method for the

expectation of POD annihilation, and is a significant piece of the work for ladies with suspected endometriosis.

The solid connection between bowel DIE and endometriomas has been depicted already, revealing 57% of ladies in their

investigation with endometriomas having existing together entrails DIE. Another planned examination affirmed this

relationship, with 49% of ladies with one-sided or two-sided endometriomas having existing together inside DIE. (47)

Adenomyosis:

an unpredictable or intruded on junctional zone, sub endometrial lines and buds, echogenic islands inside the

myometrium, myometrial cysts, presence of fan formed shadowing, uterine wall asymmetry, translesional vascularity as

well as an enlarged uterus (37-39). Be that as it may, the abovementioned referenced ultrasound highlights are not

pathognomonic for adenomyosis. Myometrial cysts may for example be cystic degeneration in fibroids or optional to

tamoxifen use,and Fan formed shadowing is additionally found in fibroids because of the presence of calcifications or

potentially cysts .

Most adenomyosis injuries are poorly characterized; however some might be very much characterized and are called

adenomyomas. Albeit some adenomyosis injuries are clearly central on ultrasound check or naturally visible assessment,

the ectopic endometrial tissue is regularly more diffusely present inside the myometrium on histological assessment .

Most myometrial lisions are found totally in the myometrium , withendometrial cavity and the adenomyotic growth might

be seen during contrast sonohysterography (51)

. A fibroid develops and drives the nearby myometrium away. In spite of the fact that the myometrium might be packed

and look diminished, it can recuperate after myomectomy without loss of solid myometrial tissue. Despite what might be

expected, in adenomyosis the ectopic endometrial tissue enters between the myometrial cells without packing the

myometrium as endometrial tissue is in the midst of myometrial tissue. Resection of adenomyosis may bring about a

ISSN 2394-7330



considerable loss of myometrium. Despite the fact that the differential conclusion between an adenomyoma and a fibroid

with cystic degeneration might be hard to make utilizing ultrasonography, the contrast between a commonplace fibroid

and diffuse adenomyosis is regularly direct. A fibroid is regularly a very much characterized round injury though most

adenomyosis sores are not well characterized. The echogenicity of a fibroids shifts generally from uniform hypo-, iso-or

hyper echogenic to non-uniform with blended echogenicity as well as solid calcifications. The nearness of endometrial

tissue as well as liquid filled glandular structures (lisions) inside the myometrium in ladies with adenomyosis, causes the

heterogeneous cystic ultrasound( 52)

Appearance of the uterine wall ,It is critical to stretch the absence of all around structured planned information on the

estimation of the various highlights depicted in the writing, as far as indicative significance and clinical significance. It is

for the most part accepted that the more highlights are distinguished, the more probable the conclusion of adenomyosis. In

any case, the significance of every one of the highlights and clinical indications of agony or uterine draining isn't known.

The restorative ramifications ought to in this manner be considered with alert too. (53)

Transrectal u/s

Three kinds of endometriosis are commonly described: peritoneal, ovarian and profound invading endometriosis (DIE),

with the last being characterized as the invasion of endometrial stores of ≥5mm into encompassing tissue.(54) The most

commonly affected areas are the uterosacral ligament (USL), recto-sigmoid colon, recto-vaginal septum (RVS), vagina

and bladder.

The symptoms of endometriosis are much dependant on area of the disease anyway dysmenorrheal, interminable pelvic

torment, profound dyspareunia, exhaustion, and subfertility keep on being the main symptoms.(55) DIE including the

RVS is by and large connected with progressively serious types of dyschezia and dyspareunia and DIE including the

urinary tract can give recurrence, nocturia, bladder fits and hematuria.(56) Delay in the conclusion of endometriosis

despite everything stays an issue, with an announced interim from beginning protest to determination differing from 7.96

to 11.73years.(57) An assortment of demonstrative strategies have been assessed in the course of recent decades in

diagnosing DIE, for example, transvaginal ultrasound (TVS), (MRI), transrectal ultrasound, barium bowel enema ,

anyway complete analysis is still frequently just made at laparoscopy.(58)

MRI

With the reference standard for a complete conclusion being histology of hysterectomy example. Both transvaginal

ultrasound and MRI demonstrated significant levels of precision for the determination of adenomyosis. The pooled

affectability for TVUS was 72% (95% CI 65-79%), the explicitness 81% (95% CI 77-85%), while MRI had a pooled

affectability of 77% (95% CI 67- 85%) and an explicitness of 89% (95% CI 84-92%). This represents, in more seasoned

arrangement, MRI had a marginally better symptomatic exactness when contrasted with transvaginal ultrasonography.

The determination of adenomyosis depended on the presence of at least one of the accompanying sonographic features : a

globular uterine arrangement, poor meaning of the junctional zone, sub endometrial echogenic straight striations,

myometrial echotexture, myometrial cysts and a heterogeneous myometrial echo texture. The affectability and

explicitness of transvaginal ultrasonography for the conclusion of adenomyosis were 87% and 60%, individually. The

presence of sub endometrial direct striations had the most elevated analytic precision for adenomyosis. (59)

CT Scans can be utilized to visualize endometriosis in certain regions of the abdomen, yet are not proficient in picturing

the pelvic organs, for example, the uterus. Be that as it may, they can be utilized to distinguish ureteral contribution in

endometriosis — endometrial lisions impeding or contracting the ureters, or the tubes that connect the kidneys to the

bladder — and kidney problems related with the condition.

What to expect during a CT scan

For the CT examine, the patient lies on a table, which slides into an enormous doughnut molded machine that takes the

pictures. The patient is presented to limited quantities of ionizing radiation, marginally more than the introduction during

an ordinary X-beam examine in light of the fact that more data is being collected.

ISSN 2394-7330



Before some CT filters, patients may need to drink a contrast liquid, which better features specific areas of the body. In

different cases, the contrast is infused in the circulatory system or inside the rectum by douche. Most patients have gentle

or no responses to this agent.

The results of the scan

For patients with endometriosis, the CT scan may reveal endometrial lesions on the ureters or kidneys, or on the

abdominal wall. If so, the doctor may recommend a laparoscopy to confirm the diagnosis and remove the lesions.

Tumor markers

It is critical that CA125 is at present the best single serum marker for ovarian malignant growth, in spite of the fact that its

middle level in the endometriosis tests fell beneath the clinical edge of 35 U/mL utilized for ovarian malignant growth

recognition.

CA125 has been researched widely as a flowing marker of endometriosis, despite the fact that needs symptomatic

precision at the point when utilized alone. Our information bolsters this thought, with serum CA125 giving 40%

affectability at 90% explicitness in our companion. Its exhibition was additionally cycle-subordinate, being better at

segregating secretory stage tests. Cyclic contrasts in CA125 levels in endometriosis have been accounted for already,

despite the fact that the demonstrative advantage of considering cycle stage is indistinct. Solvent ICAM1 has likewise

been examined as a flowing marker with clashing reports on its handiness as a biomarker .

3. CONCLUSION

Albeit a few blends of tests arrived at the limit of symptomatic precision to be considered as a swap test for indicative

laparoscopy or a triage to improve determination for medical procedure, these outcomes relied on just one investigation

for each situation, so would should be affirmed preceding broad usage.

One of the mix tests that certified for a substitution test for distinguishing endometriosis included endometrial PGP 9.5. It

must be noticed that PGP 9.5 has not yet arrived at the models for routine use as a low‐invasive symptomatic test in

clinical practice, as exhibited in the endometrial biomarkers studies. Its utility is reliant on its consistency of identification

in the endometrium and its consistency of precision in diagnosing endometriosis. More work on setting up the most ideal

method of endometrial examining and all inclusive research center techniques is required. Moreover, in‐office examining

of the endometrium may not be pertinent to the gathering of young ladies, for whom early finding and avoiding the

symptomatic medical procedure are especially significant. Serum CA‐125 demonstrated baffling outcomes and seemed to

have no an incentive in diagnosing endometriosis as a solitary test. This is reliable with worldwide rules which don't

suggest CA‐125 testing in ladies with suspected endometriosis. CA‐125 was fused in the demonstrative boards that

indicated high analytic execution; anyway its incentive as a piece of a consolidated board must be built up.

Blend of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) with blood biomarkers (CA‐125 or CA 19.9) could set up the determination of

ovarian endometrioma with high conviction, though negative test couldn't affirm that members are disease‐free.

Investigation of the indicative test precision measurements uncovers that, actually, option of any of these biomarkers

doesn't significantly add to the exactness of diagnosing endometrioma gave by TVUS alone, as shown in the imaging

survey from this arrangement . Blend of TVUS with vaginal assessment was exact enough to identify endometriosis in the

pocket of Douglas (POD), vaginal divider and rectovaginal septum (RVS), yet an ordinary assessment couldn't bar

endometriosis. This is predictable with universal rules which suggest TVUS as a first line examination related to a history

and pelvic assessment in ladies with suspected endometriosis, Considering the discoveries of the imaging tests audit from

this arrangement, a few imaging strategies showed high exactness in identifying pelvic, ovarian or profound invading

endometriosis (DIE), exhibiting gauges better than those for imaging and biomarkers mixes. These tests included TVUS

with gut arrangement (TVUS‐BP) and rectal water differentiates (RWC‐TVS) and MRI, yet none of these tests was

remembered for any of the consolidated test boards.

Rectal endometriosis was the main site that could be precisely distinguished by utilizing TVUS and pelvic assessment.

This is especially significant for distinguishing rectosigmoid endometriosis as presurgical inside arrangement and medical

procedures that consolidate the aptitude of gynecologists and colorectal specialists (or include gynecological specialists

with the skill to attempt entrails medical procedure) can be arranged preoperatively when rectosigmoid sores are

ISSN 2394-7330



moderately dependably recognized. In this manner, the proof on blends of the tests to be utilized in clinical practice as a

substitution test to supersede laparoscopic analysis or a triage test to lessen the necessity for laparoscopic careful

determination stays inadequate.

Adding combined noninvasive techniques to routine endometriosis diagnosis ,will improve mapping of endomtriosis,

management and prognosis.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author’s contribution

Authors have equally participated and shared every item of the work.

REFERENCES

[1] Olive DL, Schwartz LB. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:1759–1769

[2] Exacoustos C, Zupi E, Piccione E. Ultrasound Imaging for Ovarian and Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. Semin

Reprod Med 2017;35:5-24.

[3] Okaro E, Condous G, Khalid A, Timmerman D, Ameye L, Huffel SV, et al. The use of ultrasound-based 'soft

markers' for the prediction of pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain--can we reduce the need for

laparoscopy? BJOG 2006;113:251-6.

[4] Testa AC, Van Holsbeke C, Mascilini F, et al. Dynamic and interactive gynecologicalultrasound

examination.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:225–9.

[5] Valentin L. High-quality gynecological ultrasound can be highly beneficial, but poor-quality gynecological

ultrasound can do harm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999;13:1–7.

[6] Bean E, Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. How to assess the ureters during pelvic ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol

2019;53(6):729–33

[7] Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S, et al. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive

disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(4):759–765.

[8] Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum

Reprod. 2014;29(3):400– 412.

[9] Seracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Guerrini M, et al. Dyschezia and posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of

360cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(6):695–699.

[10] Perez-Utrilla Perez M, Aguilera Bazan A, Alonso Dorrego JM, et al. Urinary tract endometriosis: clinical,

diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Urology. 2009;73(1):47–51.

[11] Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J. What‘s the delay? A qualitative study of women‘s experiences of reaching a

diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1296–1301.

[12] Roman H, Carilho J, Da Costa C, et al. Computed tomography-based virtual colonoscopy in the assessment of bowel

endometriosis: The surgeon‘s point of view. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016;44(1):3–10.

[13] Hudelist G, English J, Thomas AE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis

of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(3):257–263.

[14] Bazot M, Bornier C, Dubernard G, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography

for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis. Human Reproduction. 2007;22(5):1457–1463.

[15] Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, et al. Deep endometriosis: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fertil Steril.

2012;98(3):564–571.

ISSN 2394-7330



[16] Delpy R, Barthet M, Gasmi M, et al. Value of endorectal ultrasonography for diagnosing rectovaginal septal

endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. Endoscop. 2005;37(4):357–361.

[17] Vercellini P, Frontino G, Pietropaolo G, et al. Deep endometriosis: definition, pathogenesis, and clinical

management. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(2):153–161.

[18] Maccagnano C, Pellucchi F, Rocchini L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of bladder endometriosis: state of the art.

Urol Int. 2012;89(3):249–258.

[19] Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, et al. European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging

of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(7):2765–2775.

[20] Bazot M, Lafont C, Rouzier R, Roseau G, Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E. Diagnostic accuracy of physical

examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose

deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(6):1825–1833.

[21] Hsu AL, Khachikyan I, Stratton P. Invasive and noninvasive methods for the diagnosis of endometriosis. Clin Obstet

Gynecol. 2010;53(2):413–419. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181db7ce8.

[22] Del Frate C, Girometti R, Pittino M, Del Frate G, Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C. Deep retroperitoneal pelvic

endometriosis: MR imaging appearance with laparoscopic correlation. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1705–1718

[23] Lagana A.S., Vitale S.G., Salmeri F.M., Triolo O., Ban Frangez H., Vrtacnik-Bokal E., Stojanovska L.,

Apostolopoulos V., Granese R., Sofo V. Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno: A novel, evidence-based, unifying

theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med. Hypotheses. 2017;103:10–20.

[24] Pluchino N., Taylor H.S. Endometriosis and stem cell trafficking. Reprod. Sci. 2016;23:1616–1619. doi:

10.1177/1933719116671219.

[25] Lagana A.S., Salmeri F.M., Vitale S.G., Triolo O., Gotte M. Stem cell trafficking during endometriosis: May

epigenetics play a pivotal role? Reprod. Sci. 2017;25:978–979. doi: 10.1177/1933719116687661.

[26] Eggers J.C., Martino V., Reinbold R., Schafer S.D., Kiesel L., Starzinski-Powitz A., Schuring A.N., Kemper B.,

Greve B., Gotte M. microRNA miR-200b affects proliferation, invasiveness and stemness of endometriotic cells by

targeting ZEB1, ZEB2 and KLF4. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2016;32:434–445. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.12.013.

[27] Miller EJ, Fraser IS. The importance of pelvic nerve fibers in endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond)

2015;11(5):611–618. doi: 10.2217/whe.15.47.

[28] Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S, Lesaffre E, Cornillie FJ. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is

a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril.

1991;55:759–765.

[29] Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP., Jr Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation.Radiographics.

2001;21(1):193–216.

[30] Moawad NS, Caplin A. Diagnosis, management, and long-term outcomes of rectovaginal endometriosis. Int J

Womens Health. 2013; 5: 753-763.

[31] van der Wat J, Kaplan MD . Modified virtual colonoscopy: a noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of rectovaginal

septum and deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14: 638-643.

[32] Belghiti J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Zacharopoulou C, Zilberman S, Jarboui L, Bazot M, et al. Contribution of

computed tomography enema and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose multifocal and multicentric bowel

lesions in patients with colorectal endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 776-784.

[33] Lagana A.S., Vitale S.G., Salmeri F.M., Triolo O., Ban Frangez H., Vrtacnik-Bokal E., Stojanovska L.,

Apostolopoulos V., Granese R., Sofo V. Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno: A novel, evidence-based, unifying

theory for the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Med. Hypotheses. 2017;103:10–20.

ISSN 2394-7330



[34] Lagana A.S., Salmeri F.M., Vitale S.G., Triolo O., Gotte M. Stem cell trafficking during endometriosis: May

epigenetics play a pivotal role? Reprod. Sci. 2017;25:978–979.

[35] Eggers J.C., Martino V., Reinbold R., Schafer S.D., Kiesel L., Starzinski-Powitz A., Schuring A.N., Kemper B.,

Greve B., Gotte M. microRNA miR-200b affects proliferation, invasiveness and stemness of endometriotic cells by

targeting ZEB1, ZEB2 and KLF4. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2016;32:434–445.

[36] Giudice L.C., Kao L.C. Endometriosis. Lancet. 2004;364:1789–1799

[37] Halme J., Hammond M.G., Hulka J.F., Raj S.G., Talbert L.M. Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in

patients with endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1984;64:151–154.

[38] Knabben L, Imboden S, Fellmann B, Nirgianakis K, Kuhn A, Mueller MD. Urinary tract endometriosis in patients

with deep infiltrating endometriosis: prevalence, symptoms, management,and proposal for a new clinical

classification. Fertility and sterility. 2015;103(1):147-52. Epub2014/12/03.

[39] Chapron C, Chopin N, Borghese B, Foulot H, Dousset B, Vacher-Lavenu MC, et al. Deeply infiltrating

endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Humanreproduction. 2006;21(7):1839-45.

Epub 2006/03/18.

[40] Chapron C, Bourret A, Chopin N, Dousset B, Leconte M, Amsellem-Ouazana D, et al. Surgery for bladder

endometriosis: long-term results and concomitant management of associated posterior deep lesions. Human

reproduction. 2010;25(4):884-9. Epub 2010/02/05.

[41] Exacoustos C, Malzoni M, Di Giovanni A, Lazzeri L, Tosti C, Petraglia F, et al. Ultrasound mapping system for the

surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Fertility and sterility.2014;102(1):143-50 e2. Epub

2014/05/06.

[42] Pateman K, Holland TK, Knez J, Derdelis G, Cutner A, Saridogan E, et al. Should a detailed ultrasound examination

of the complete urinary tract be routinely performed in women with suspected pelvic endometriosis? Human

reproduction. 2015;30(12):2802-7. Epub 2015/10/05.

[43] Moro F, Mavrelos D, Pateman K, Holland T, Hoo WL, Jurkovic D. Prevalence of pelvic adhesions on ultrasound

examination in women with a history of Cesarean section. Ultrasound in obstetrics &gynecology : the official

journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.2015;45(2):223-8. Epub

2014/07/22.

[44] Bazot M, Malzy P, Cortez A, Roseau G, Amouyal P, Darai E. Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal

endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology :

the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;30(7):994-1001.

[45] Reid S BT, Lu C, Lam A, Condous G. The use of intra-operative saline sonovaginography to define the rectovaginal

septum in women with suspected rectovaginal endometriosis: a pilot study.Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in

Medicine. 2011;14(3):16-21.

[46] Menada MV, Remorgida V, Abbamonte LH, Fulcheri E, Ragni N, Ferrero S. Transvaginal ultrasonography

combined with water-contrast in the rectum in the diagnosis of rectovaginalendometriosis infiltrating the bowel.

Fertility and sterility. 2008;89(3):699-700. Epub 2007/11/16.

[47] Reid S, Lu C, Hardy N, Casikar I, Reid G, Cario G, et al. Office gel sonovaginography for the diagnosis of posterior

deep infiltrating endometriosis: a multicenter prospective observational study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology

: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound inObstetrics and Gynecology. 2014. Epub

2014/05l28.

[48] Goncalves MO, Podgaec S, Dias JA, Jr., Gonzalez M, Abrao MS. Transvaginal ultrasonography with bowel

preparation is able to predict the number of lesions and rectosigmoid layers affected incases of deep endometriosis,

defining surgical strategy. Human reproduction. 2010;25(3):665-71. Epub2009/12/22.

ISSN 2394-7330



[49] Bergamini V, Ghezzi F, Scarperi S, Raffaelli R, Cromi A, Franchi M. Preoperative assessment of intestinal

endometriosis: A comparison of transvaginal sonography with water-contrast in the rectum,transrectal sonography,

and barium enema. Abdominal imaging. 2010;35(6):732-6. Epub 2010/04/07.

[50] Khong SY, Bignardi T, Luscombe G, Lam A. Is pouch of Douglas obliteration a marker of bowel endometriosis?

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2011;18(3):333-7.

[51] Reid S, Lu C, Condous G. Can we improve the prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration inwomen with suspected

endometriosis using ultrasound-based models? A multicenter prospectiveobservational study. Acta obstetricia et

gynecologica Scandinavica. 2015. Epub 2015/09/25.

[52] Tammaa A, Fritzer N, Strunk G, Krell A, Salzer H, Hudelist G. Learning curve for the detection ofpouch of Douglas

obliteration and deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum. Human reproduction. 2014;29(6):1199-204. Epub

2014/04/30.

[53] Piessens S, Healey M, Maher P, Tsaltas J, Rombauts L. Can anyone screen for deep infiltratingendometriosis with

transvaginal ultrasound? The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics &gynaecology. 2014;54(5):462-8.

Epub 2014/10/08.

[54] Tammaa A, Fritzer N, Lozano P, Krell A, Salzer H, Salama M, et al. Interobserver agreement and accuracy of non-

invasive diagnosis of endometriosis by transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound inobstetrics & gynecology : the official

journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics andGynecology. 2015;46(6):737-40. Epub

2015/03/15.

[55] Vandermeulen L, Cornelis A, Kjaergaard Rasmussen C, Timmerman D, Van den BoschT. Guiding histological

assessment of uterine lesions using 3D in vitro ultrasonography and stereotaxis. Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2017;9:77-

84.

[56] Reeves MF, Goldstein RB, Jones KD. Communication of adenomyosis with the endometrial cavity: visualization

with saline contrast sonohysterography. Ultrasound ObstetGynecol 2010;36:115-9.

[57] Alabiso G, Alio L, Arena S, Barbasetti di Prun A, Bergamini V, Berlanda N, et al.Adenomyosis: What the Patient

Needs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23:476-88.

[58] Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S, et al. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive

disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil Steril. 1991;55(4):759–765.

[59] Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum

Reprod. 2014;29(3):400– 412.

[60] Perez-Utrilla Perez M, Aguilera Bazan A, Alonso Dorrego JM, et al. Urinary tract endometriosis: clinical,

diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Urology. 2009;73(1):47–51.

[61] Ballard K, Lowton K, Wright J. What‘s the delay? A qualitative study of women‘s experiences of reaching a

diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1296–1301.

[62] Roman H, Carilho J, Da Costa C, et al. Computed tomography-based virtual colonoscopy in the assessment of bowel

endometriosis: The surgeon‘s point of view. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016;44(1):3–10.

[63] Sun YL, Wang CB, Lee CY, Wun TH, Lin P, Lin YH, et al. Transvaginal sonographic criteria for the diagnosis of

adenomyosis based on histopathologic correlation. Taiwan JObstet Gynecol 2010;49:40-41

Non-invasive techniques in diagnosis of endometriosis: A ...

Documents

Transcript of Non-invasive techniques in diagnosis of endometriosis: A ...