Impacting College-Going and Completion Rates in Your Community: Taking a Systems Approach
-
Upload
national-partnership-for-educational-access -
Category
Education
-
view
448 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Impacting College-Going and Completion Rates in Your Community: Taking a Systems Approach
1
Impacting College-Going and Completion Rates in Your Community: Taking a
Systems Approach
NPEA Conference WorkshopApril 29, 2011
Sarah Singer QuastProject Manager
OMG’s CAS research: Current and past partners
An increasing number of foundations are supporting systems-level change initiatives. Foundations are trying to figure out ways to impact larger number of students through broader policy and practice changes.
Key CAS Trends: Moving towards “Systems-Change”
CAS efforts focused on discrete programming – academic tutoring, college
fairs, financial aid information, in-college supports.
Cooperation among CAS players for a coordinated system of supports – need for system-level and -informed changes to take us from current patchwork of programs to a coordinated system of comprehensive services and supportive policies.
Traditional Approach
New Approach
In many local communities:
• Multiple organizations working towards the same goals independently
• Multiple uncoordinated funding streams supporting the same goals
• Perceptions of inefficiencies in the way resources are being distributed; potential duplicative efforts/initiatives
• In an environment of limited resources, pressure to maximize, leverage, and coordinate existing resources at a community-level
“Systems-change”: Why the focus?
• Curriculum alignment in Miami and Philadelphia
• Community college policy change in San Francisco
• New York City’s data warehouse
• Philadelphia’s Mayor’s Council
“Systems change”: Policy and practice examples
1. Identifying Community CAS Stakeholders
2. Identifying Stakeholder Alignments
3. Brainstorming Policy and Practice Opportunities
4. Using Data to Drive the Agenda
Tools for Taking a Systems Approach
7
Students
Institutions of Higher Education
Community or School-Based Organizations
Advocacy and Communications
Groups Policymakers
Research Organizations
Business Community
Funding Partners
Parents, family, adult mentors
Intermediaries and Technical
Assistance Providers
Independent and Parochial Schools
Players that directly
interact with students
Broader network that influences policy and
system-level efforts
Nonprofit-Driven Collaborations
Federal Government-Driven Collaborations
City Government-Driven Collaborations
Collaborative efforts that
bring together multiple
stakeholders
Foundation-Driven Collaborations
Understanding who is already operating in your college access and success environment, both the usual and less usual players, is a first step in identifying new opportunities for impact.
1. Identifying Community CAS Stakeholders
School District
8
Students
Higher education•Community College of Philadelphia
• PA State Universities• PA State-Related Universities• Local Private Colleges and Universities
Community or School-Based Organizations
•GEAR UP •Philadelphia Academies•Philadelphia Education Fund•Philadelphia Futures•Project GRAD•White Williams Scholars
Advocacy and Communications
Groups
Policymakers•Mayor Nutter•Mayor’s Chief Education Office
•Congressman Chaka Fattah•Governor Rendell
Research Organizations•Johns Hopkins University•Metis Associates•Philadelphia Education Fund•OMG Center for Collaborative Learning•Research for Action
Business Community•Citizens Bank•Comcast• Independence Blue Cross•PricewaterhouseCoopers
Funding Partners (Citi Foundation
•PA Department of Education•US Department of Education•US Department of Labor
Parents, family, adult mentors
Intermediaries and Technical Assistance Providers
•Academy for Educational Development (AED)
•Philadelphia Youth Network•Public Education Network (PEN)
School District Offices of:•College and Career Awareness•Guidance Counseling and Promotion Standards
•Teaching and Learning•High School Reform Policy and Research•Multiple Pathways to Graduation
Mayor’s Council for College and Career Success College Prep Roundtable
Citi Postsecondary Success Program City-Level
Partnership
Student Success Center Learning Community
Education First Compact
Graduate!Philadelphia
Example: Philadelphia
GEAR UP
A scan that OMG conducted of the Philadelphia landscape in 2010 identified a variety of stakeholders operating in the local CAS system.
• Who is providing supports to students directly?
• Who are the other stakeholders that might have influence at the policy or system level?
• Are there existing collaborations or collaborative efforts where multiple partners are coming together?
• What connections does your organization currently have to these other stakeholders?
Who are the CAS Stakeholders in your community?
Thinking about where various stakeholders operate in the system can help to identify potential synergies among partners, as well as gaps in service.
2. Identifying Stakeholder Alignments
System-Level
School-Level
Student-Level
Elementary School
Middle School High SchoolCollege/
UniversityWorkforce
Nonprofit Program X
City-wide Initiative Y
School District Initiative Z
• Which stakeholders are serving students at different or similar points in the pipeline?
• Which CAS efforts are targeting change at the student, school, or system level?
• Where are you operating in the CAS system?
• Which stakeholders are operating in the same space as your organization?
• Where are their gaps in the system?
How do the efforts in your community align?
System-level solutions emerge from thinking about student-level challenges and successes, and how these might be translated into broader changes that could impact an expanded group of students.
3. Brainstorming Policy and System-Level Practice Opportunities
School Changes
Identified Student-Level Successes and
Challenges
District ChangesCity
Changes
State Changes
Federal Changes
Higher Ed Changes
Nonprofit Changes
PracticePolicy
• What are the strongest factors in your experience that currently help students who successfully go to and stay in college?
• What challenges/barriers are holding back unsuccessful students the most?
• How could successful factors be replicated for students by nonprofits, at the school level, through district policy, etc?
• How could challenges/barriers be systematically removed for students?
What are potential areas of policy and practice to target?
Data serve as a key tool for testing ideas about student challenges and successes, as well as practice and policy areas. Data can help to provide the evidence base for joint and coordinated action across partners and with new stakeholders.
4. Using Data to Drive the Agenda
1. Frame questions to:
• Test hunches
• Develop evidence base
2. Consider key data indicators:
• Identify which milestones answer questions
• Tweak questions, if necessary
3. Assess data availability:
• Your org’s data collection
• Other known data sources
• Potential pathways or partnerships for obtaining additional data
Key quantitative measures of college access and success milestones include the following.
4. Using Data to Drive the Agenda: Consider Key Data Indicators
High school Indicators
College Indicators
• What are key questions from your policy and practice brainstorm?
• What indicators would help answer these questions?
• What data is your organization already collecting?
• What data might be available through other stakeholders in the system?
What data can help test and drive the CAS agenda?