2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

108
2012 PROFESSIONALISM IN THE WORKPLACE STUDY ____________________________ __________________________________

Transcript of 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Page 1: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

2012

PROFESSIONALISM IN

THE WORKPLACE

STUDY

______________________________________________________________

Page 2: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 2

2012 Professionalism Study Table Of Contents

Page

Introduction 5

Research Design 9

Major Findings 13

Defining Professionalism 23

State of Professionalism in the Workplace 33

Impact of Professionalism 79

Appearance and Professionalism 83

Changing Definitions of Professionalism 93

Deadly Employee Mistakes 99

Developing Professionalism 107

Profile Of Respondents 113

Appendix 123

Page 3: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 3

2012 Professionalism Study Introduction

Introduction

Page 4: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Project Purpose

Report Format

When York College of Pennsylvania’s Center for Professional Excellence was created in 2009, it was

decided that an integral part of the Center would be a research component. Each year, the Center

conducts a national study of professionalism in the workplace.

Findings from the annual studies are used to track changes in the state and definitions of

professionalism. They also help direct the content of the professionalism seminars that the Center for

Professional Excellence offers every year to the college’s students, faculty, and administrators.

Each year’s study includes a national sample of HR professionals. These persons are in a position to

assess the level of professionalism found in new hires who have recently graduated from college. The

findings from this sample are tracked over time.

Last year, a sample of upper class undergraduates was added. This provided insight into how students

about to enter the workforce perceive professionalism among their peers. Interestingly, many of their

answers paralleled those of the HR professionals.

This year, a sample of managers/supervisors was included in the study. While a significant amount is

now known about new hires, the research had yet to examine experiences with existing employees. This

was accomplished with the inclusion of this group of respondents.

The first four sections of the report constitute an executive summary. These sections are Introduction,

Research Design, Major Findings, and Observations.

The sections following the executive summary present the detailed findings. These findings are

reported in both graphic and narrative forms.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 4

2012 Professionalism Study Introduction

Page 5: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 5

2012 Professionalism Study Research Design

Research Design

Page 6: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Sample

Data Collection

Research Instrument

As stated earlier, the study used two randomly selected national samples. A total of 309 HR

professionals were surveyed. The second sample consisted of persons responsible for managing or

supervising employees. This was composed of 312 managers. The characteristics of each sample

are presented in the final section of this report.

The maximum margin of error associated with the samples is + or – 5.5% at the 95% confidence

level. This means the answers that would be obtained from either the population of all HR

professionals or managers would be within + or – 5.5% of the samples’ answers 95% of the time.

The data was collected using online surveys. Respondents were sent an e-mail from Dr. George

Waldner, President of the York College. The e-mail introduced the study and contained a link to the

online survey.

The surveys were developed using input from the Center for Professional Excellence’s Advisory

Board. Some questions from the 2009 and 2010 HR professional surveys were used to permit

comparisons over time.

The survey for the managers was a variation on the HR professional survey. The wording of the

questions was modified to reflect these respondents’ positions interacting with existing employees.

Prior to being administered, the surveys were reviewed and approved by the Advisory Board and the

Center for Professional Excellence.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 6

2012 Professionalism Study Research Design

Page 7: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 7

Data Analysis In addition to the total samples, the findings for each sample were statistically examined for any

differences due to respondents’ demographics.

In the HR and manager samples, the demographics included the respondent’s age, education level,

number of employees at all locations and in the human resources department, and industry type.

Any statistically significant differences related to respondents’ demographics are reported in the text.

Where applicable, comparisons are made between the 2009 and 2010 findings. These are shown in

the graphs.

Open-ended responses were coded into descriptive categories for presentation purposes. The

report shows the predominant categories. The data tables can be consulted for a complete review

of all the coded responses.

2012 Professionalism Study Research Design

Page 8: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 8

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Major Findings

Page 9: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Annual Survey of

Professionalism

Overview

This is the third annual professionalism poll conducted for the Center for Professional Excellence.

In this year’s study, managers as well as HR professionals were surveyed. Previous studies with

HR professionals focused on experiences with recently hired college graduates. With the inclusion

of managers, an examination of professionalism in existing employees is also possible.

Professionalism is more prevalent in existing employees than in new hires. Consistently, managers

were less likely than the HR respondents to report a lack of professionalism. When managers

specified the employee segments that most lack professionalism, they pointed to younger

employees. The generation gap in behaviors and expectations discovered in earlier studies

continues with this study.

Despite the apparent generation gap, the majority of both managers and HR respondents feel that

the definition of what is professional should not be subject to change. The attitude appears to be

that young employees should learn to conform to current standards of professionalism rather than

the standards being modified in response to larger societal changes.

Differences that do exist between manager and HR respondents are not surprising. HR

respondents encounter the employee either during the hiring process or when the employee has

done something severe enough to have it become an HR matter. Managers see the employees on

the job once they have been hired.

To permit a comparison of the answers from the two types of respondents, their findings are

presented separately.

Comparing the findings from all three studies, there may be indications that some aspects of

professionalism are improving in the workplace. The bad economy could be partly responsible for

this. Both sets of respondents note that with the bad economy the pool of applicants from which to

hire has grown. With more persons applying for employment, the ability to hire someone who

already exhibits professionalism increases.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 9

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 10: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Defining

Professionalism

After three years of asking HR respondents what qualities characterize professionalism, a firm

understanding of these qualities now exists. The managers’ answers are generally similar to those

from the HR respondents. The expected qualities to be a professional are common to both new

and existing employees.

The predominant qualities associated with professionalism are: interpersonal skills, appearance,

communication skills, time management, confidence, being ethical, having a work ethic, and being

knowledgeable.

The quality of Interpersonal skills involves several dimensions. It includes etiquette, being

courteous, showing others respect, and behavior that is appropriate for the situation.

Similarly, time management encompasses being punctual as well as using one’s time efficiently.

The differences that exist between HR and manager respondents are predictable. Managers more

often than HR respondents name work ethic (managers, 32.7% vs. HR, 14.2%) and time

management (managers, 27.2% vs. HR, 20.8%) as qualities of the professional. Managers are

more likely to see these qualities in existing employees than HR professionals are to experience

them in the interview process.

The qualities that define being unprofessional tend to be the mirror image of the qualities of the

professional. Again, managers name the same qualities as do the HR respondents. The qualities

named most often as unprofessional by both types of respondents are: inappropriate appearance,

lack of dedication, poor work ethic, sense of entitlement, disrespect, poor communication skills,

unfocused, and a poor attitude.

Again, the differences that do exist between HR and manager respondents are understandable.

Managers are notably less likely to mention sense of entitlement (managers, 9.1% vs. HR, 22.7%)

and communication skills (managers, 11.2% vs. HR, 21.0%). A sense of entitlement is probably

more apparent during an employment interview than once the person is hired. Someone with poor

communication skills may get no further than an interview.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 10

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 11: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

State of Professionalism

International Scene

Sense of Entitlement

For a sizable percentage of respondents, the state of professionalism in employees has decreased

over the past five years. A third of the HR respondents (33.1%) and a fifth of the managers

(21.2%) feel this way.

The good news is professionalism has increased for 16.0% of the HR respondents and 27.2% of

the managers. This could be one good result of a bad economy. When asked why they believe

the presence of professionalism has increased, respondents most often observe that the poor

economy and consequent downsizing has increased the pool of applicants from which to choose.

The HR and manager respondents whose companies have locations outside the United States

were asked about the state of professionalism seen abroad. Unlike the United States, few of them

believe professionalism has decreased outside the United States (managers, 4.4%; HR, 7.2%).

The lack of professionalism may be largely a United States phenomenon. It may be productive to

perform more in-depth international comparisons.

Half of the HR respondents (50.5%) and a third of the managers (33.7%) feel a sense of

entitlement among employees has increased over the past five years. The difference between the

HR and manager respondents may be partly due to the age of employees encountered. HR

respondents are more likely than managers to interact with younger employees. Comments from

the managers indicate that it is younger employees who are most likely to exhibit a sense of

entitlement.

The question about sense of entitlement has been asked to the HR respondents since the initial

study in 2009. It is a positive sign that the number of HR professionals reporting an increase in the

percentage of employees having a sense of entitlement has decreased each of the three years this

study has been conducted (2009, 60.9%; 2010, 55.3%; 2011, 50.5%). Future studies will continue

to track this to determine if a trend exists.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 11

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 12: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

IT Abuses

Unfocused Employees

While HR respondents may be less likely to report a sense of entitlement among employees, this is

not the case with IT abuses. After two years when nearly 40% of the HR respondents indicated

that IT abuses have increased, the percentage feeling this way has increased to 51.8% this year.

Obviously, this will be monitored in future studies to see if this larger percentage is an aberration.

About a third of the managers (34.3%) report an increase in IT abuses. Comments by the

managers suggest that, while this problem encompasses most of the workforce, it is still the

younger employees who are most likely to be engaging in this behavior.

The IT problems being witnessed are similar for both HR and manager respondents. The most

common abuses are excessive twittering/Facebook (managers, 79.4%; HR, 82.5%), inappropriate

use of the Internet (managers, 86.9%; HR, 78.1%), text messaging at inappropriate times

(managers, 79.4%; HR, 81.9%), and excessive cell phone usage for personal calls (managers,

64.5%; HR, 65.0%).

HR respondents have been asked about these types of abuses for the past two studies. From last

year to this year, the percentage reporting problems with twittering or Facebook has jumped from

67.3% to 82.5%. This large of an increase is worth watching to see if it continues in subsequent

studies.

Last year’s research discovered that unfocused employees may be a new emerging phenomenon.

To pursue this, a structured question was included in this year’s survey of managers asking if the

percentage of unfocused employees has changed over the past five years. A fifth of the managers

(21.8%) indicated that this has increased. Of the 14.7% of the managers willing to specify an

employee segment most likely to be unfocused, half (54.3%) pointed to younger employees.

Causes of being unfocused were most often identified as Internet and social media (26.9%),

personal problems related to the economy (20.9%), and less ownership of one’s work (19.4%).

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 12

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 13: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Qualities of the

Professional

Qualities considered important in a professional are similar for HR and manager respondents.

When rating a list of possible qualities, most importance is assigned to displaying a sense of ethics

and accepting personal responsibility for one’s decisions and actions. The only difference is

managers rate being an expert in one’s field as being more important than do HR respondents.

This is understandable given the employee segments each type of respondent encounters.

Managers are more likely than HR respondents to find these qualities in employees. This may be

due to managers rating existing employees and HR respondents rating new employees. There are

two exceptions to this. Managers are less likely than HR respondents to feel existing employees

are able to do work that is creative. Of course, managers are the ones who would experience that

once the employee is hired. Managers also believe that existing employees are less likely to be

concerned about opportunities for advancement. This concern may be more often voiced by

employees during the hiring process. There could well be a relationship between a sense of

entitlement and asking about opportunities for advancement before one is actually hired.

A comparison of importance and prevalence ratings reveals that the prevalence of the

professionalism qualities is less than the importance assigned to them. HR and manager

respondents are similar in this finding. This reinforces findings from previous years. The largest

gap between the two ratings is found for “accepts personal responsibility for decisions and actions”

and “is open to criticism.”

Similar to previous years, the only quality whose prevalence receives a higher rating than its

importance is “concern about the opportunities for advancement.” The gap is larger in new

employees than in existing employees.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 13

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 14: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Impact of

Professionalism

Impact of Appearance

Changing Definitions of

Professionalism

Deadly Mistakes During

An Interview

The importance of exhibiting professionalism is clearly seen in the impact it has in both hiring and

advancement. In last year’s study, 96.0% of the HR respondents reported that one’s

professionalism affects the likelihood of being hired. This year, 92.9% of the managers stated that

an employee’s professionalism has an impact on promotion opportunities.

The majority of the respondents’ companies have a dress code (managers, 75.0%; HR, 77.7%).

The dress code in nearly all cases applies to attire (managers, 99.1%; HR, 98.3%). Quite often,

the code also includes facial piercings other than ears (managers, 31.4%; HR, 44.8%) and visible

tattoos (managers, 21.8%; HR, 39.3%).

According to the respondents, one’s appearance has an impact on being hired and promoted.

Appearance goes beyond hiring or promotion, it also affects the perception of one’s ability to

perform their job requirements competently.

One possibility is that definitions of professionalism should change over time to reflect cultural

shifts in society. Most HR and manager respondents disagree with this. Consistent with this, they

disagree with the thought that a perceived lack of professionalism may be the result of older

generations judging younger generations.

HR respondents identified the following as the most common mistakes that an applicant can make

during an interview: inappropriate attire (39.9%), being late for the interview (29.1%), lack of

preparation for the interview (25.9%), and poor verbal skills including grammar (22.7%).

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 14

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 15: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Worst Problems in New

Employees

Reasons for Firing

Developing

Professionalism

Managers were asked about the worst problems they see in new employees once they are hired

and working. The four mentioned by a fifth or more of the managers are: lack of urgency in getting

a job done (32.6%), a sense of entitlement (27.2%), poor performance coupled with a mediocre

work ethic (23.0%), and poor attendance (22.2%). Often cited with the lack of urgency was

employees exercising poor time management.

The final set of mistakes examined was activities or shortcomings that can lead to an employee’s

dismissal. For both HR professionals (50.7%) and managers (43.6%), the most common factor

that causes an employee to be fired relates to attendance. Poor attendance includes being tardy,

leaving early, and numerous absences.

Other frequently named factors by HR respondents are: poor work ethic (25.7%) and IT abuses

(22.8%).

The additional predominant reasons for dismissal cited by managers are: poor work ethic (34.8%),

poor time management (31.1%), and unethical behavior (30.7%).

Since less than half of the respondents (managers, 47.1%; HR, 45.6%) report that their companies

have programs to orient new employees on what is considered to be professional behavior, it is

understandable that most of the respondents feel colleges should develop professionalism

regardless of the student’s major.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 15

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 16: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Role of Age A reoccurring theme throughout the research findings is the role of age in defining what is

professionalism. Repeatedly, managers single out younger employees as the ones least likely to

exhibit professionalism. The younger respondents are the ones who most often feel that the

perceived lack of professionalism in the workplace is due to an older generation reviewing the

behaviors and attitudes of a younger generation. Consistent with this, they are also the

respondents who agree that definitions of professionalism should change to reflect the standards of

younger employees.

A challenge when discussing changing what is associated with professionalism is what should be

accepted. Is it acceptable for employees to text during a meeting or surf the Internet whenever

they get bored? If a sense of entitlement is left unchecked, how does self-centered behavior affect

fellow workers or a sense of teamwork?

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 16

2012 Professionalism Study Major Findings

Page 17: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 17

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Defining Professionalism

Page 18: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Qualities That

Describe

Professionalism -

HR

One question that led to the initial research was how do employers define professionalism.

Understanding the employer’s perspective is important since they are the ones who are hiring college

graduates. To answer this question, HR professionals were asked what three qualities best describe an

employee who is considered to be professional. This question is asked in every professionalism study to

permit tracking over time.

Responses were more varied this year than in previous years. The graph presents the predominant

answers. The data tables should be consulted for all responses.

While there are changes in the percentages, the most frequently cited qualities are same as previous

years. These are interpersonal skills (33.6%), work ethic (27.3%), appearance (25.3%), and

communication skills (24.9%).

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 18

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Page 19: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 19

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Qualities That Describe Professionalism - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Interpersonal skills

Communication skills

Work ethic Appearance Confidence Knowledgeable Time management

48

.0%

46

.9%

35

.4%

34

.2%

20

.1%

12

.2%

9.2

%

38

.5%

40

.6%

33

.7%

39

.0%

23

.5%

17

.6%

16

.9%

33

.6%

24

.9%

27

.3%

25

.3%

20

.7%

9.3

%

20

.8%

2009 (n=433) 2010 (n=421) 2011 (n=289)

Page 20: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Qualities That

Describe

Professionalism

To date, the research has focused on experiences with newly hired employees. This year, the scope of

the research was expanded to also include existing employees. This was done by surveying managers

or supervisors of employees.

As seen in the next graph, HR professionals and managers share the same perspective on the qualities

that constitute professionalism. The largest difference between HR professionals and managers applies

to work ethic. Managers (32.7%) are notably more likely than HR professionals (14.2%) to mention this

quality. This may be due to managers actually experiencing the employees’ work ethic. This would be a

quality that HR professionals may not see while they are hiring the employee.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 20

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Page 21: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 21

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Qualities That Describe Professionalism - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0% 3

3.6

%

25

.3%

24

.9%

20

.8%

20

.7%

15

.2%

14

.2%

9.3

%

32

.6%

25

.4%

23

.7%

27

.2%

17

.1%

11

.8%

32

.7%

12

.5%

2011 HR (n=289) 2011 Manager (n=287)

Page 22: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Qualities That

Describe Being

Unprofessional -

HR

Comparison To

Previous Years

Knowing how not to act can be as useful as knowing how to act. Recognizing this, respondents were

asked what three qualities best describe the unprofessional employee. Similar to the qualities that

characterize professionalism, this question has been asked in each of these studies. Again, this permits

an examination of the definition over the years.

This year, the qualities associated with being unprofessional are most often: Appearance (25.5%), lack of

dedication (22.7%), sense of entitlement (22.7%), poor work ethic (22.7%), not showing respect (21.7%),

and poor communication skills (21.0%).

These are the same qualities named in the two previous studies. However, the percentage of HR

respondents citing each is less. This is largely due to respondents this year giving a wider variety of

answers.

From 2009 to 2010, there was a significant increase in HR respondents mentioning lack of dedication and

being unfocused. These percentages have remained at relatively high levels this year. This could signal

emerging problems being seen in new employees.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 22

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Page 23: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 23

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Qualities That Describe Being Unprofessional - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Poor work ethic Appearance/ dress/ tattoos and piercings

Communication skills

Poor attitude/ manners/cocky

Disrespectful/ inconsiderate/

rude

Sense of entitlement

Not dedicated Unfocused

42

.6%

39

.1%

38

.9%

28

.3%

27

.4%

16

.6%

6.1

%

6.1

%

42

.9%

40

.0%

36

.2%

21

.9%

22

.9%

17

.6%

23

.6%

20

.5%

22

.7%

25

.5%

21

.0%

11

.2%

21

.7%

22

.7%

23

.8%

16

.8%

2009 (n=427) 2010 (n=420) 2011 (n=286)

Page 24: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Qualities That

Describe Being

Unprofessional

Managers were also asked to describe the qualities that characterize the unprofessional employee. Their

answers may reveal differences between newly hired and longer term employees.

For the most part, managers agree with HR professionals in their answers. However, they are less likely

to name a sense of entitlement (9.1%) and poor communication skills (11.2%).

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 24

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Page 25: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 25

2012 Professionalism Study Defining Professionalism

Qualities That Describe Being Unprofessional

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Appearance/ dress/ tattoos and piercings

Not dedicated Poor work ethic Sense of entitlement

Disrespectful/ inconsiderate/

rude

Communication skills

Unfocused Poor attitude/ manners/cocky

25

.5%

23

.8%

22

.7%

22

.7%

21

.7%

21

.0%

16

.8%

11

.2%

23

.8%

23

.4%

26

.9%

9.1

%

25

.9%

11

.2%

21

.3%

11

.5%

2011 HR (n=286) 2011 Manager (n=286)

Page 26: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 26

2012 Professionalism Study State of Professionalism

State of Professionalism

Page 27: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 27

Percentage Of

Employees Exhibiting

Professionalism

Comparison To

Previous Years

HR professionals were asked what percentage of new college graduates they hire exhibit

professionalism in their first year. For managers, the wording was modified to refer to the percentage

of the employees they supervise who exhibit professionalism.

Managers (41.0%) are much more likely than HR professionals (10.3%) to report that 90% or more of

the employees they supervise exhibit professionalism.

This is another question that has been asked of HR professionals in every study. The findings in this

study are similar to those in the previous two studies.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 28: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 28

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Percentage Of Employees Exhibiting Professionalism

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Less than 10% 10% to 29% 30% to 49% 50% to 69% 70% to 89% 90% or more

8.1

%

23

.3%

9.4

%

25

.6%

23

.3%

10

.3%

8.7

%

5.5

%

2.9

%

17

.6%

24

.3%

41

.0%

2011 HR (n=309) 2011 Manager (n=312)

Page 29: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 29

Changes In Exhibiting

Professionalism - HR

Comparison To

Previous Years

HR professionals indicated if the percentage of new employees exhibiting professionalism in their first

year on the job has changed over the past five years.

The most striking finding is a third of these respondents (33.1%) feel the presence of professionalism

in new employees has decreased.

This year’s findings are a return to those from the 2009 study. Future studies will show if the 2010

findings were an aberration.

The percentage who believe professionalism has increased has increased slightly over the three

studies. This change is too small to represent a trend. However, it is worth watching in future

studies. If this is actually an increase, it could be a reflection of the economy and the increased pool

of applicants looking for employment.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 30: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 30

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Changes In Exhibiting Professionalism - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

13.4%

53.4%

33.2%

15.6%

60.7%

23.7%

16.0%

50.9%

33.1%

2009 HR (n=485) 2010 HR (n=430) 2011 HR (n=309)

Page 31: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 31

Changes In Exhibiting

Professionalism

Reasons For Increased

Professionalism

Reasons for

Decreased

Professionalism

Segmentation Analysis

Managers were asked about changes in the professionalism of employees they supervise over the

past five years.

Over a fourth of the managers (27.2%) feel professionalism has increased. This is in contrast to the

16.0% of HR professionals who say the same thing about first year employees.

It is possible that the lack of professionalism is more prevalent in newer employees. This possibility

is reinforced by managers’ comments concerning employee segments that are less likely than others

to exhibit professionalism. Of the 36.5% of the managers who identify a segment who is less

professional, about a third of them (30.5%) give younger employees this distinction. These would be

the persons seen by HR respondents.

For most HR professionals who see an increase in professionalism, the economy is considered the

primary reason for this increase. Over half of these respondents (57.5%) point to fewer jobs and,

consequently, more competition as a reason for more professionalism. This was followed by the

belief that schools are doing a better job preparing students to act professionally (20.0%).

Managers who report an increase in professionalism also most often feel that increased competition

for jobs has expanded the pool from which to hire (33.3%). The next most common reason offered

for this perception is better training (15.4%).

When responding why there is a decrease in professionalism, HR respondents most often point to a

change in our cultural values (22.6%). Mentioned next frequently was new hires lacking experience

or training (15.1%).

The most commonly given reasons cited by managers for a decrease in professionalism are less

formality in the workplace (15.6%) and a change in the work ethic (12.5%).

HR respondents under 35 were significantly less likely to believe that professionalism has decreased

(24.5%). This effect of age was not found for manager respondents.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 32: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 32

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Changes In Exhibiting Professionalism

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

16.0%

50.9%

33.1%

27.2%

51.6%

21.2%

HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 33: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 33

International Changes

In Exhibiting

Professionalism

To get a sense for the state of professionalism outside the United States, respondents whose

companies have international locations were asked the same question about changes in

professionalism over the past five years. HR professionals were asked about new college graduates.

Managers were asked about employees in general.

A total of 28.5% of the HR professionals and 56.7% of the managers reported their companies have

international locations.

Few of the HR (7.2%) or manager (4.4%) respondents have experienced a decrease in

professionalism among new and existing employees respectively. This is in contrast to the 33.1%

HR and 21.2% manager respondents in the United States who have seen a decrease in

professionalism.

HR professionals are notably more likely to believe professionalism in new employees has increased

outside the United States (33.9%) than in the United States (16.0%). The percentage of managers

feeling professionalism has increased outside the United States (27.7%) is essentially the same as

the percentage who believe it has increased in the United States (27.2%).

The international experience will be researched further in future studies. At this time, it can be

speculated that the lack of professionalism is mainly an American phenomenon.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 34: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 34

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

International Changes In Exhibiting Professionalism

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

33.9%

58.9%

7.2%

27.7%

67.9%

4.4%

HR (n=56) Managers (n=112)

Page 35: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 35

Change In Sense Of

Entitlement - HR

Comparison To

Previous Years

Suggestions that the younger generation has a sense of entitlement prompted including questions

about this in the research. HR professionals have been asked every year if the percentage of new

college graduates exhibiting a sense of entitlement has changed over the past five years.

The findings that are most instructive are the percentage who report either a decrease or increase in a

sense of entitlement. The percentage indicating it has remained the same is not very informative since

the baseline is not known.

The percentage of HR respondents who believe the sense of entitlement has increased has gone down

each year. The percentage this year is 50.5%. This may be a positive sign. Of course, future studies

will continue to track this measure to see if this is a trend.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 36: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 36

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Change In Sense Of Entitlement - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

60.9%

32.4%

6.7%

55.3%

38.6%

6.0%

50.5%

40.5%

9.1%

2009 (n=466) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=309)

Page 37: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 37

Change In Sense Of

Entitlement

Reasons For Sense

Of Entitlement

Segmentation

Analysis

HR professionals (50.5%) are more likely to witness an increase in a sense of entitlement among new

employees than managers (33.7%) are among existing employees. This may be further evidence that it

is a specific segment of employees who exhibit certain qualities.

The above statement receives support in the 38.1% of the managers are able to identify a specific

segment that is most likely to display a sense of entitlement. Singled out most often for this distinction

are younger employees (45.6%). Interestingly, 11.4% of the managers pointed to older employees who

are ready to retire as being the ones exhibiting a feeling of entitlement.

The HR professionals most often cite the upbringing of children by parents (17.8%) and a cultural

change (17.0%) as the reasons for an increase in a sense of entitlement. Managers cite similar reasons

for feelings of entitlement. They most often referred to cultural change (15.3%), upbringing of children

by parents (14.3%), and a younger workforce (12.2%) as reasons for a sense of entitlement.

Entitlement is more likely to be found in larger than smaller companies.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 38: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 38

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Change In Sense Of Entitlement

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

50.5%

40.5%

9.1%

33.7%

48.7%

17.6%

HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 39: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 39

Problems With IT

Etiquette/Abuses -

HR

While fewer HR professionals are seeing an increase in a sense of entitlement among new employees,

this is not the case with problems related to IT misuse or etiquette.

When asked if these types of problems have changed over the past five years, the percentage of HR

professionals (51.8%) stating they have increased is the largest ever.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 40: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 40

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Problems With IT Etiquette/Abuses - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

39.1%

16.1%

44.8%

38.4%

50.9%

10.7%

51.8%

45.3%

2.9%

2009 (n=471) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=309)

Page 41: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 41

Problems With IT

Etiquette/Abuses

The possibility that IT abuses, similar to decreased professionalism and a sense of entitlement, is a

phenomenon related to the younger generation is seen in the differences between HR professionals’

and managers’ responses to the question on changes in the prevalence of IT abuses. HR professionals

(51.8%) are significantly more likely than managers (34.3%) to report an increase in IT abuses.

It may be the HR respondents who have to deal with these abuses.

The argument that is a problem mainly with younger employees receives some support from the

managers identifying a specific segment as most likely to have problems with their IT etiquette. Of the

22.8% of the managers naming a segment, 60.3% referred to younger employees as the most likely

abusers.

However, that only 22.8% specified a segment indicates that IT problems may be more widespread

throughout the workforce than is a lack of professionalism or a sense of entitlement.

It should be recalled that the question directed to HR professionals referred to new employees. The

managers were asked about all employees.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 42: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 42

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Problems With IT Etiquette/Abuses

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

51.8%

45.3%

2.9%

34.3%

57.4%

8.3%

HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 43: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 43

Problems Being

Experienced - HR

Comparison To Last

Year

The IT problems being encountered most often by HR professionals are numerous. The predominant

four problems are: Excessive twittering/use of Facebook (82.5%), text messaging at inappropriate times

(81.9%), inappropriate use of the Internet (78.1%), and excessive use of cell phones for personal calls

(65.0%).

The consistency in the HR professionals’ answers for the past two years increases confidence in these

findings. The increase in the percentage commenting on excessive twittering/use of Facebook, going

from 67.3% in 2010 to 82.5% this year, is worth noting. Next year’s study will shed more light on

whether this is really an increased problem.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 44: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 44

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Problems Being Experienced - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Text messaging at inapproriate times

Inappropriate use of Internet

Excessive cell phone usage for

personal calls

Excessive twittering/Facebook

Unauthorized access of company

files

78.2% 77.0%

71.5%

67.3%

15.8%

81.9%

78.1%

65.0%

82.5%

7.5%

2010 (n=165) 2011 (n=160)

Page 45: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 45

Problems Being

Experienced

Apparently, the types of IT misuses being experienced are common for both HR professionals and

managers. The responses from the two samples are similar.

Managers (86.9%) are more likely than HR respondents (78.1%) to find employees using the Internet

inappropriately. This may be because this behavior does not become an HR issue as readily as some

of the other abuses.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 46: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 46

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Problems Being Experienced

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Text messaging at inapproriate times

Inappropriate use of Internet

Excessive cell phone usage for

personal calls

Excessive twittering/Facebook

Unauthorized access of company

files

81.9%

78.1%

65.0%

82.5%

7.5%

79.4%

86.9%

64.5%

79.4%

14.0%

HR (n=160) Managers (n=107)

Page 47: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 47

Changes In

Employees Being

Unfocused -

Managers

Reason For The

Increase

In the 2010 study, a significant increase occurred from 2009 in the percentage of HR professionals who

named being unfocused as a quality they associate with being unprofessional. That percentage went

from 6.1% to 20.5%.

Reacting to that finding, managers were queried in this study if they have observed a change in the

percentage of employees who are unfocused over the past five years. In fact, a fifth of the managers

(21.8%) reported that they believe the percentage of unfocused employees has increased during this

time period. It is uncanny how close this percentage is to the percentage of HR professionals

identifying unfocused as a quality of being unprofessional.

When asked if a particular employee segment is more unfocused, 14.7% were willing to identify a

segment. Of these managers, over half (54.3%) named younger employees as the most likely to be

unfocused. If it is assumed that entry level employees are mostly young, this percentage increases to

65.2%.

Managers who feel employees being unfocused has increased most often referred to these causes for

the increase: Electronic devices including the Internet and social media (26.9%), personal problems

often driven by the poor economy (20.9%), and less ownership of one’s work (19.4%).

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 48: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 48

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Changes In Employees Being Unfocused - Managers

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Increased Remained the same Decreased

21.8%

67.0%

11.2%

Managers (n=312)

Page 49: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 49

Important Qualities

In Professionalism -

HR

In addition to asking HR professionals to describe the qualities associated with being a professional, a

more structured approach has also been used since the initial study. The structured approach has

respondents rate qualities according to how important they are in a recent college graduate being

considered for a position requiring professionalism. Possible ratings range from 1, not important, to 5,

very important. Mean ratings are presented in the graph.

Since the first study, some qualities have been added to the list. Typically, their addition is due to

findings in the previous year’s study. This is why a rating is not shown for every year for some qualities.

This measure is used in all studies to reveal any changes that occur over time. Most notable about

these findings is their consistency across the three studies. For example, there is no doubt that

“displaying a sense of ethics” and “accepting personal responsibility for decisions and actions” are

important qualities of a professional.

At the other extreme, “being an expert in one’s field” is the least important quality of a professional as it

applies to a new employee.

The only quality for which a change is noteworthy is “completing the job as required.” This quality has

been assigned more importance in both 2010 and 2011 than in 2009.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 50: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1 2 3 4 5

Displays sense of ethics

Accepts personal responsibility for decisions/actions

Competent verbal & written communication

Works as a team member

Thoroughly prepared

Takes initiative

Projects a professional image

Completes job as required

4.73

4.61

4.44

3.89

4.48

4.54

4.48

4.36

4.33

4.23

4.56

4.52

4.40

4.39

4.33

4.31

4.30

4.29

2009 (n=451-452) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=306-309)

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 50

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Important Qualities In Professionalism - HR Mean Ratings Not Important Very Important

Page 51: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is able to think independently

Open to criticism

Exhibits commitment to the company

Is able to act independently

Is flexible

Demonstrates passion for one's work

Is able to critically evaluate data

4.42

4.07

4.33

4.29

4.33

4.06

4.30

4.25

4.22

4.23

4.17

4.25

4.03

4.26

4.18

4.16

4.15

4.15

4.08

3.98

2009 (n=451-452) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=306-309)

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 51

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Important Qualities In Professionalism - HR (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important Very Important

Page 52: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1 2 3 4 5

Demonstrates leadership ability

Tries balance between work & personal life

Sense of responsibility to greater community

Is able to do work that is creative

Concern for opportunities for advancement

Is an expert in one's field

3.77

3.80

3.63

3.42

3.31

3.95

3.82

3.77

3.80

3.46

3.34

3.80

3.77

3.72

3.60

3.41

3.16

2009 (n=451-452) 2010(n=430) 2011 (n=306-309)

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 52

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Important Qualities In Professionalism - HR (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important Very Important

Page 53: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 53

Important Qualities

In Professionalism

The comparison of HR professionals and managers continued with the rating question on the

importance of qualities associated with professionalism. For the managers, the question asked about

the importance of the qualities in all employees.

The similarity in the ratings shows that the qualities apply equally to both new and existing employees.

The only difference would be expected. Managers (3.55) assign more importance to “being an expert in

one’s field” than do the HR professionals (3.16). This is probably due to HR professionals rating the

importance of the qualities in new employees. New employees are not expected to be experts in their

field.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 54: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Displays sense of ethics

Accepts personal responsibility for decisions/actions

Competent verbal & written communication

Works as a team member

Thoroughly prepared

Takes initiative

Projects a professional image

Completes job as required

4.56

4.52

4.40

4.39

4.33

4.31

4.30

4.29

4.59

4.59

4.35

4.45

4.47

4.34

4.39

4.39

HR (n=306-309) Managers (n=310-312)

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 54

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Important Qualities In Professionalism Mean Ratings Not Important Very Important

Page 55: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is able to think independently

Open to criticism

Exhibits commitment to the company

Is able to act independently

Is flexible

Demonstrates passion for one's work

Is able to critically evaluate data

4.26

4.18

4.16

4.15

4.15

4.08

3.98

4.17

4.15

4.06

4.18

4.08

3.99

3.90

HR (n=306-309) Managers (n=310-312)

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 55

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Important Qualities In Professionalism (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important Very Important

Page 56: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Demonstrates leadership ability

Tries balance between work & personal life

Sense of responsibility to greater community

Is able to do work that is creative

Concern for opportunities for advancement

Is an expert in one's field

3.80

3.77

3.72

3.60

3.41

3.16

3.91

3.80

3.68

3.48

3.47

3.55

HR (n=306-309) Managers (n=310-312)

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 56

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Important Qualities In Professionalism (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important Very Important

Page 57: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 57

Extent To Which

Qualities Exist In

First Year Employees

Supplementing the measure of importance of qualities is the prevalence to which the qualities are found

in first year college educated employees. The scale used for this rating went from 1, very rare, to 5,

very common.

The graph shows little change over the three years in which this study was conducted.

The only quality that has a significant presence continues to be “a concern about opportunities for

advancement.”

At the other extreme, the quality that is least prevalent is “being an expert in one’s field.” It should be

recalled that this was also the least important quality for a new employee being a professional. The

steady increase in this quality’s prevalence is probably a reflection of the bad economy. The pool of

applicants from which hiring is occurring has gotten larger. This results in the ability to hire persons

who have more expertise than would normally be present in a good economy.

The change from 2009 to 2010 and 2011 for “completing the job within the required time” is consistent

with the change seen in the importance assigned to this quality.

There are other small changes that have occurred over the past three years that may mark the

beginning of a trend. For example, the presence of “the ability to think and act independently” have

been increasing since the initial study. Similar small increases have occurred for “a sense of

responsibility to the greater community.”

In the opposite direction, there has been a small decrease over time in the prevalence of

“demonstrating a passion for one’s work.” It should be recalled that a lack of dedication is a quality

often associated with being unprofessional.

These changes are too slight to permit drawing any conclusions. Future studies may show if these are

really trends.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 58: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 58

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism Extent to Which Qualities Exist In First Year Employees - HR

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Concerned about opportunities for advancement

Completes the job within required time

Works as a team member

Is able to do work that is creative

Tries to balance work & personal life

Is flexible

Competent in verbal & written communication

4.01

2.82

3.25

3.27

3.27

3.21

3.93

3.37

3.22

3.20

3.27

3.20

3.92

3.42

3.36

3.28

3.25

3.23

3.23

2009 (n=447) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=307-309)

Very Rare Very Common Mean Ratings

Page 59: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 59

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism Extent to Which Qualities Exist In First Year Employees - HR (continued)

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is able to think independently

Displays sense of ethics

Thoroughly prepared

Projects a professional image

Is able to act independently

Takes initiative

Demonstrates a passion for one's work

3.09

3.18

2.98

3.15

3.13

3.28

3.21

3.08

3.11

3.11

3.20

3.20

3.20

3.17

3.14

3.12

3.07

2009 (n=447) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=307-309)

Very Rare Very Common Mean Ratings

Page 60: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 60

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism Extent to Which Qualities Exist In First Year Employees - HR (continued)

1 2 3 4 5

Demonstrates leadership ability

Sense of responsibility to the greater community

Accepts responsibility for decisions/actions

Exhibits commitment to the company

Open to criticism

Is an expert in one's field

2.84

2.78

2.67

2.24

2.94

2.88

2.92

2.91

2.84

2.41

2.99

2.91

2.84

2.79

2.76

2.53

2009 (n=447) 2010 (n=430) 2011 (n=307-309)

Very Rare Very Common Mean Ratings

Page 61: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 61

Extent To Which

Qualities Exist In

Employees

The comparison of HR and manager respondents continues with the rating of the extent to which

qualities are present in either new employees or existing employees. HR respondents rated new

employees. Managers rated existing employees.

The qualities associated with professionalism tend to be present more in existing employees than in

new employees. This is especially the case with “being an expert in one’s field,” “exhibiting

commitment to one’s company,” “displaying a sense of ethics,” and “accepting responsibility for

decisions and actions.”

The two qualities that are less prevalent in existing employees are “the ability to do work that is

creative” and “concern about opportunities for advancement.” The lower prevalence of “concern about

opportunities for advancement” is a positive finding.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 62: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 62

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism Extent to Which Qualities Exist In Employees

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Concerned about opportunities for advancement

Completes the job within required time

Works as a team member

Is able to do work that is creative

Tries to balance work & personal life

Is flexible

Competent in verbal & written communication

3.92

3.42

3.36

3.28

3.25

3.23

3.23

3.58

3.48

3.56

2.99

3.37

3.42

3.26

HR (n=307-309) Managers (n=310-312)

Very Rare Very Common Mean Ratings

Page 63: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 63

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism Extent to Which Qualities Exist In Employees (continued)

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is able to think independently

Displays sense of ethics

Thoroughly prepared

Projects a professional image

Is able to act independently

Takes initiative

Demonstrates a passion for one's work

3.20

3.20

3.20

3.17

3.14

3.12

3.07

3.26

3.55

3.36

3.36

3.26

3.16

3.09

HR (n=307-309) Managers (n=310-312)

Very Rare Very Common

Mean Ratings

Page 64: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 64

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism Extent to Which Qualities Exist In Employees (continued)

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is able to critically evaluate data

Demonstrates leadership ability

Sense of responsibility to the greater community

Accepts responsibility for decisions/actions

Exhibits commitment to the company

Open to criticism

Is an expert in one's field

3.04

2.99

2.91

2.84

2.79

2.76

2.53

3.11

3.01

2.95

3.13

3.22

2.93

3.18

HR (n=307-309) Managers (n=310-312)

Very Rare Very Common Mean Ratings

Page 65: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 65

Gap Analysis Gap Analysis compares the importance and presence of each of the qualities. With one exception,

prevalence does not equal importance for both HR professionals and managers.

The exception is for “concern for opportunities for advancement.”

These findings are similar to previous years’ surveys of HR professionals.

The largest gaps according to both HR professionals and managers are found for “accepts personal

responsibility for decisions and actions” and “open to criticism.” These qualities are considered to be

important for professionalism, but are lacking in both new and existing employees.

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Page 66: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Displays sense of ethics

Accepts personal responsibility for decisions/actions

Competent verbal & written communication

Works as a team member

4.56

4.52

4.40

4.39

3.20

2.84

3.23

3.36

4.59

4.59

4.35

4.45

3.55

3.13

3.26

3.56

HR Importance HR Prevalence Manager Importance Manager Prevalence

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 66

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Gap Analysis Mean Ratings Not Important/Very Rare Very Important/Very Common

Page 67: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Thoroughly prepared

Takes initiative

Projects a professional image

Completes job as required

4.33

4.31

4.30

4.29

3.20

3.12

3.17

3.42

4.47

4.34

4.39

4.39

3.36

3.16

3.36

3.48

HR Importance HR Prevalence Manager Importance Manager Prevalence

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 67

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Gap Analysis Mean Ratings Not Important/Very Rare Very Important/Very Common

Page 68: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is able to think independently

Open to criticism

Exhibits commitment to the company

Is able to act independently

4.26

4.18

4.16

4.15

3.20

2.76

2.79

3.14

4.17

4.15

4.06

4.18

3.26

2.93

3.22

3.26

HR Importance HR Prevalence Manager Importance Manager Prevalence

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 68

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Gap Analysis (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important/Very Rare Very Important/Very Common

Page 69: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Is flexible

Demonstrates passion for one's work

Is able to critically evaluate data

Demonstrates leadership ability

4.15

4.08

3.98

3.80

3.23

3.07

3.04

2.99

4.08

3.99

3.90

3.91

3.42

3.09

3.11

3.01

HR Importance HR Prevalence Manager Importance Manager Prevalence

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 69

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Gap Analysis (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important/Very Rare Very Important/Very Common

Page 70: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Tries balance between work & personal life

Sense of responsibility to greater community

Is able to do work that is creative

Concern for opportunities for advancement

Is an expert in one's field

3.77

3.72

3.60

3.41

3.16

3.25

2.91

3.28

3.92

2.53

3.80

3.68

3.48

3.47

3.55

3.37

2.95

2.99

3.58

3.18

HR Importance Manager Importance Manager Prevalence

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 70

2012 Professionalism Study State Of Professionalism

Gap Analysis (continued)

Mean Ratings Not Important/Very Rare Very Important/Very Common

Page 71: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 71

2012 Professionalism Study Impact of Professionalism

Impact of Professionalism

Page 72: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 72

Impact Of

Professionalism

Means Of Assessing

Professionalism

Potential

The previous studies clearly found that professionalism has an effect on the hiring decision. In the

2010 study, 96.0% of the HR professionals reported that an applicant’s professionalism affects the

likelihood of being hired.

In this year’s study, managers were asked if an employee’s professionalism has an impact on their

opportunities for advancement or promotion. A total of 92.9% of the managers responded that it does

have an impact.

As might be expected, the means used to assess an employee’s professionalism varies by type of

respondent. HR respondents were asked how they assess an applicant’s potential to be

professional. Managers were queried on how they assess an existing employees’ professionalism.

The applicant’s performance during the interview process (28.2%) is used by the greatest percentage

of HR professionals to assess the potential to be professional.

For managers, it is most often one’s job performance that is used as an assessment of

professionalism (29.5%).

2012 Professionalism Study Impact of Professionalism

Page 73: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 73

2012 Professionalism Study Impact of Professionalism

Means Of Assessing Professionalism Potential

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

28

.2%

13

.9%

12

.1%

9.6

%

7.9

%

5.4

%

5.4

%

0.0

% 8.2

%

13

.2%

17

.8%

11

.2%

1.9

%

29

.5%

0.0

%

0.0

%

13

.6%

10

.9%

2011 HR (n=280) 2011 Managers (n=258)

Page 74: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 74

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Appearance and Professionalism

Page 75: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 75

Dress Code

Reasons For Dress

Code

About three-fourths of the HR professionals (77.7%) and managers (75.0%) reported that their

companies have a dress code.

The dress codes have most often in existence for over five years. A total of 69.4% of the HR

professionals and 82.1% of the managers who knew about their dress code’s history cited this

amount of time.

Nearly all of the dress codes deal with attire. This is followed by facial piercings, other than ears, and

visible tattoos.

The reasons for the creation of a dress code were similar for HR professionals and managers. These

most often were an interest in increased professionalism (HR, 22.3%; managers, 31.4%), wanting to

make a good impression on clients or customers (HR, 25.7%; managers, 23.7%), and inappropriate

attire (HR, 34.3%; managers, 20.5%)

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Page 76: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 76

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Dress Code

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Attire/dress Facial piercings (other than ears)

Visible tattoos Unnatural hair color Not visible tattoos

98.3%

44.8%

39.3%

21.3%

4.6%

99.1%

31.4%

21.8%

14.4%

5.2%

HR (n=239) Managers (n=229)

Page 77: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 77

Negative Effects On

Being Hired/Promoted

Other Factors

To understand the impact of appearance, HR professionals were presented a list of factors related to

appearance and asked which have a negative effect on someone being hired. Managers were

shown the same list. However, they were asked which ones have an effect on being hired or

promoted.

It is clear that appearance matters. Four of the factors had notable percentages of respondents

identifying them as deterrents to being hired or promoted. These factors, in order of the percentage

selecting each, are attire, facial piercings other than ears, visible tattoos, and unnatural hair color.

Respondents were also given the opportunity to name any other factors that have a negative effect

on someone getting hired.

Of the 101 HR professionals and 80 managers citing other factors, they most often named personal

hygiene (HR, 47.5%; managers, 53.8%), slovenly appearance (HR, 34.7%; managers, 22.5%),

clothes (HR, 19.8%; managers, 20.0%) and body language (HR,16.8%; managers, 2.5%).

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Page 78: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 78

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Negative Effects On Being Hired/Promoted

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Attire/dress Facial piercings (other than

ears)

Visible tattoos Unnatural hair color

Not visible tattoos

None of these

75.4%

66.0%

57.0%

42.1%

3.6%

12.3%

67.0%

59.6%

49.4%

36.2%

2.2%

22.1%

HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 79: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 79

Impact Of

Attire/Appearance On

Being Hired/Promoted

Segmentation Analysis

To further understand the effects of attire and appearance, HR professionals rated the impact of a

prospective employee’s attire or appearance on their likelihood of being hired. Managers rated the

impact on being hired or promoted. A five point rating scale was used that ranged from 1, no impact,

to 5, great impact.

As seen in the graph, one’s attire and appearance play a substantial role in being hired or promoted.

Almost three-fourths of the HR professionals (72.5%) assigned a rating of 4 or 5. Two-thirds of the

managers (67.0%) did the same.

Education level of the HR respondent is related to the belief that appearance affects being hired or

promoted. As education level increases, the perceived impact of appearance also increases.

The opposite was found in smaller companies. Smaller is defined as companies with under 100

employees. In these companies, HR respondents were less likely than those in larger companies to

feel attire plays a role in being hired or promoted.

This relationship did not exist for managers.

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Page 80: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 80

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Impact Of Attire/Appearance On Being Hired/Promoted

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

1= No Impact 2 3 4 5= Great Impact

3.6% 3.6%

20.4%

40.8%

31.7%

1.6%

9.6%

21.8%

40.7%

26.3%

HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 81: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 81

Impact Of

Attire/Appearance On

Perception Of

Competence

Segmentation Analysis

In addition to having an impact on hiring and promotion, one’s attire or appearance also has an effect

on the perception of an employee’s competence.

About half of the HR professionals (52.7%) and the managers (50.3%) gave a rating of 4 or 5 to

describe the impact of attire and appearance on the perception of one’s ability to perform their job

requirements.

Older HR professionals, over age 55, are more likely than younger respondents to feel attire has an

impact on the perception of one’s competence.

Education level of the HR respondent is also related to the belief that attire has an effect on this

perception. As education level increases, the impact which attire has also increases. This is similar

to what was found for appearance and its effect on being promoted.

Similar relationships involving managers were not discovered.

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Page 82: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 82

2012 Professionalism Study Appearance and Professionalism

Impact Of Attire/Appearance On Perception Of Competence

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

1= No Impact 2 3 4 5= Great Impact

8.4% 10.4%

28.5%

34.3%

18.4%

7.4%

16.3%

26.0%

37.5%

12.8%

HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 83: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 83

2012 Professionalism Study Changing Definitions of Professionalism

Changing Definitions of Professionalism

Page 84: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 84

Changing Definitions

of Professionalism -

HR

A point raised in reaction to the first study on professionalism was whether the perceived lack of

professionalism in new employees is the result of older persons judging the younger generation.

Perhaps, the definition of professionalism should be seen as subject to change as cultural norms and

values change in younger generations.

To test this, three statements were included in the HR professionals’ study last year. The statements

were repeated again this year.

The level of agreement with the statements this year was very similar to what was discovered last

year. The majority of HR respondents felt definitions of professionalism should not be subject to

change (59.2%). However, it should be observed that about a fourth of them (26.5%) disagreed with

this statement.

Consistent with the above findings, 57.6% disagreed that the definition of professionalism should

change with generations. In the opposite direction, 26.9% agreed with the statement that the

definition should change with generations.

Nearly two-thirds of the HR professionals (63.4%) disagreed with the idea that the perceived lack of

professionalism is due to generational differences between those evaluating the state of

professionalism and those being evaluated.

2012 Professionalism Study Changing Definitions of Professionalism

Page 85: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 85

2012 Professionalism Study Changing Definitions of Professionalism

Changing Definitions Of Professionalism - HR

27.8%

23.6%

6.8%

35.6%

34.0%

19.7%

19.4%

15.5%

14.2%

15.5%

20.4%

40.1%

1.6%

6.5%

19.1%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%

Perception of lack of professionalism due to generational differences

Definitions of professionalism should change with generations

Definitions of professionalism should not be subject to change

Strongly Agree Agree Undecided Disagree Strongly Disagree

Page 86: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 86

Changing Definitions

of Professionalism

Segmentation Analysis

Continuing an examination of possible differences in the experiences of HR professionals and

managers, the managers were presented the same three statements about changing definitions of

professionalism. For purposes of this graph, the possible answers were scored 1= strongly disagree,

and 5= strongly agree.

Managers are more likely than HR respondents to feel that definitions of professionalism can change

with time. However, most managers like HR respondents disagree with this idea.

The effect which age has on what is considered to be professional receives support from the

respondents’ ratings of these statements. For both HR and manager respondents, those under 35

are the most likely to believe that definitions of professionalism should change with the generations.

They are also the respondents to most likely feel that a generation gap is responsible for the

perception of lacking professionalism in the workplace.

2012 Professionalism Study Changing Definitions of Professionalism

Page 87: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 87

2012 Professionalism Study Changing Definitions of Professionalism

Changing Definitions Of Professionalism

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00

Definitions of professionalism should not be subject to change

Definitions of professionalism should change with generations

Perception of lack of professionalism due to generational differences

3.45

2.52

2.28

3.33

2.74

2.56

HR (n=309) Managers 2011 (n=309-311)

Strongly Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly Agree

Mean Ratings

Page 88: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 88

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Deadly Mistakes

Page 89: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 89

Deadly Mistakes

During An Interview -

HR

HR professionals named the three most deadly mistakes an applicant can make during an interview

for a position requiring professionalism.

The most frequently described mistakes are shown in the graph. All of the responses are listed in the

data table.

Reinforcing the importance of attire, the most common mistake was inappropriate attire at the

interview (39.9%). This was followed by being late for the interview (29.1%), not being prepared for

the interview which includes not knowing about the company (25.9%), and having poor verbal skills

(22.7%).

As hard as it may be to believe, the 11.2% of the HR respondents who mentioned cell phones being

on or used during the interviews represents 31 persons. Rather than this being an isolated incident, it

appears to be relatively common.

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Page 90: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 90

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Deadly Mistakes During An Interview - HR

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

39.9%

29.1% 25.9% 22.7%

13.3% 12.6% 12.6% 12.2% 11.9% 11.2% 11.2%

HR (n=278)

Page 91: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 91

Worst Problems In

New Employees -

Managers

Managers were asked to identify the three worst problems they see in new employees once they are

hired and working.

The most frequent problem is employees not understanding the urgency required for completing

assignments (32.6%). Poor time management is seen as being largely responsible for this.

Following this is the self-centered employee who displays a sense of entitlement (27.2%).

Other commonly named problems are poor performance accompanied by a weak work ethic (23.0%)

and poor attendance (22.2%). The poor attendance includes being late, leaving early, and missing

many days of work.

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Page 92: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 92

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Worst Problems In New Employees - Managers

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

32.6% 27.2%

23.0% 22.2% 18.0%

14.2% 12.3% 12.3%

Managers (n=261)

Page 93: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 93

Reasons For Firing

HR professionals and managers also described the three behaviors or shortcomings that are likely to

get a new college graduate fired. They were informed to not include downsizing as a reason.

While the reasons are shared by both HR professionals and managers, there are differences in the

percentage of respondents giving each reason for dismissal. This is most likely the result of the

respondents’ positions.

For both HR professionals (50.7%) and managers (43.6%), the most common reason for being fired is

related to poor attendance. This was also cited as a problem which managers encounter in new

employees.

A greater percentage of managers than HR respondents mentioned a poor work ethic, time

management, and unethical behavior. It is likely that managers experience these behaviors more often

than do HR respondents.

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Page 94: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 94

2012 Professionalism Study Deadly Mistakes

Reasons For Firing

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0% 5

0.7

%

25

.7%

22

.8%

16

.5%

14

.7%

13

.6%

13

.2%

13

.2%

12

.5%

43

.6%

34

.8%

10

.6%

31

.1%

6.1

%

8.0

%

30

.7%

6.8

% 14

.4%

2011 HR (n=272) 2011 Manager (n=264)

Page 95: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 95

2012 Professionalism Study Developing Professionalism

Developing Professionalism

Page 96: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 96

Company Programs

On Professionalism

Almost half of the HR professionals (45.6%) and managers (47.1%) report that their companies have

programs that specifically orient new employees to what is considered to be professional behavior.

Most of the HR professionals (92.9%) and managers (94.5%) indicated that this topic is included as

part of the orientation program.

2012 Professionalism Study Developing Professionalism

Page 97: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 97

2012 Professionalism Study Developing Professionalism

Company Programs On Professionalism

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Yes No

36.5%

63.5%

45.6%

54.4%

47.1%

52.9%

2010 HR (n=430) HR 2011 HR (n=309) Managers (n=312)

Page 98: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 98

Should Colleges

Prepare Students To

Be Professionalism

Almost all of the HR professionals (91.9%) and managers (94.2%) believe that college should

develop professionalism in students regardless of their field of study. In the 2009 study, an even

higher percentage of HR professionals (97.6%) felt this way.

When asked what activities colleges should have to develop professionalism in undergraduates,

respondents most often gave the following suggestions.

2012 Professionalism Study Developing Professionalism

HR

(n=151)

Managers

(n=141)

More internships/on-the-job training 15.2% 24.8%

Business etiquette classes/workshops 15.2% 14.9%

Workplace preparedness and expectations 13.2% 18.4%

Interviewing skills 11.9% 0.0%

Communication skills 6.6% 8.5%

Business/professional ethics 6.6% 2.8%

Professionalism class 6.0% 10.6%

Page 99: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 99

2012 Professionalism Study_______________________________________

Should Colleges Prepare Students To Be Professional

0.0%

20.0%

40.0%

60.0%

80.0%

100.0%

Yes No

97.6%

2.4%

91.9%

8.1%

94.2%

5.8%

2009 HR (n=417) 2011 HR (n=309) 2011 Managers (n=312)

Page 100: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 100

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of Respondents

Profile Of Respondents

Page 101: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

HR Sample

Number Of Employees

At All Locations

Number Of Employees

In HR Department

The characteristics of the HR professional respondents are presented below.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 101

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of HR Respondents

Under 10 2.3%

10 to 50 4.2%

51 to 100 21.8%

101 to 250 26.6%

251 to 500 11.7%

Over 500 33.4%

n= 308

1 to 2 39.8%

3 to 5 28.8%

6 to 10 12.9%

Over 10 18.4%

n= 309

Page 102: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 102

Type Of Industry

Respondent’s Age

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of HR Respondents

Service 17.2%

Manufacturing 16.2%

Construction 7.8%

Financial/banking 6.8%

Government 5.8%

Retail 5.5%

Medical/healthcare 5.2%

Education 4.5%

Wholesale 4.2%

Other 26.7%

n= 308

Under 35 15.4%

35-55 61.2%

Over 55 23.4%

N= 428

Page 103: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 103

Respondent’s Level Of

Education

Position

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of HR Respondents

High school graduate of

less 3.2%

Some college/

technical school 15.2%

Undergraduate degree 44.3%

Graduate degree 37.2%

n= 309

President/CEO/CFO 17.5%

Administrative 3.8%

Human Resources 35.0%

Vice President/

Sr Vice President 3.1%

Manager 14.0%

Director 4.5%

Controller 3.1%

Other 19.0%

n= 286

Page 104: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 104

Position Of Person To

Whom Report…

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of HR Respondents

President/CEO 32.7%

VP of Administration 15.9%

CFO 10.4%

Board of Directors 10.0%

COO 4.5%

Other 26.5%

n= 309

Page 105: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Manager Sample

Number Of Employees

At All Locations

Number Of Employees

In Supervise

The characteristics of the manager respondents are presented below.

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 105

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of Manager Respondents

Under 10 2.6%

10 to 50 32.%

51 to 100 10.3%

101 to 250 7.4%

251 to 500 11.0%

Over 500 65.5%

n= 310

1 to 2 26.6%

3 to 5 25.3%

6 to 10 22.1%

Over 10 26.6%

n= 312

Page 106: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 106

Type Of Industry

Respondent’s Age

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of Manager Respondents

Manufacturing 20.5%

Service 14.4%

Financial/banking 8.3%

Retail 7.4%

Medical/healthcare 5.1%

Education 4.5%

Government 4.2%

Construction 3.5%

Wholesale 1.6%

Other 30.4%

n= 312

Under 35 28.1%

35-55 56.5%

Over 55 15.5%

n= 310

Page 107: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One

Polk-Lepson Research Group January 2012

York, Pennsylvania Page 107

Respondent’s Level Of

Education

Position

2012 Professionalism Study Profile Of Manager Respondents

High school graduate of

less 3.5%

Some college/

technical school 19.6%

Undergraduate degree 42.8%

Graduate degree 34.1%

n= 311

Manager 51.6%

Senior Manager 9.9%

Administrative 9.2%

Supervisor 9.2%

Other 20.1%

n= 273

Page 108: 2012 Professionalism in the Workplace Study - From Day One