Post on 28-Nov-2014
description
Online public consultation and civic engagement
Learnings from Federal Government Trials and International Experiences
Jim Macnamara PhD, FPRIA, FAMI, CPM, FAMEC
Professor of Public Communication &Director, Australian Centre for Public Communication
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
Terms
E-government Government 2.0 E-democracy E-citizenship Digital democracy Teledemocracy Cyberdemocracy
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
Terms
E-government• Primarily the online delivery of services
E-democracy• “The use of Web technologies to engage citizens in
debate, discussion, consultation and online voting” (Kearns, 2002, p. 11)
• Online submissions
• Online voting
• Online public consultation
• Online civic engagement in democratic processes
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
E-government: E-democracy
Initiatives underway internationally• US – Clinton adminstration 1993-97. Mainly services
FirstGov site Sept 2002 – now www.usa.gov
• Canada – bilingual site opened Dec 1995. Now Government of Canada or Gouvernement du Canada http://canada.gc.ca
• UK – a long history of development www.gateway.gov.uk – registration of services www.govtalk.gov.uk – for accessing govt documents www.petitions.pm.gov.uk – petitions www.number10.gov.uk site http://petitions.number10.gov.uk www.direct.gov.uk launched Mar 2004 Directionlessgov – www.directionlessgov.com
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
E-government: E-democracy
New Zealand• www.e.govt.nz
UK Cabinet Power of Information Task Force (UK Cabinet, 2009)
• 3,000 government Web sites – aim to reduce to 1,000
• Review report 2007; final report 2009 Australia (federally)
• One of the first to publish Hansard
• Webcast Parliamentary proceedings
• National Office of the Information Economy (NOIE) established in 1997
• Office of Government Online 2000
• Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO) replaced NOIE in 2004
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O E-government: E-democracy - Australia Future Challenges for E-Government (AGIMO
2004)
• Noted an “international trend towards online service delivery and greater citizen interaction”
• Most focus on service delivery
Better Practice Checklist on Online Policy Consultation (AGIMO 2004)
Election of the Rudd government (Kevin07) new focus
Consulting with Government – Online (AGIMO, June 2008)
Minister Tanner announced online consultation trials July 2008
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O Federal Online Consultation Trials Three (3) online consultation trials launched
Dec 2008 – Mar 2009
• Department of Broadband and Digital Economy blog to discuss digital economy
• Department of Employment and Work Relations forum for teachers/educators on early education
• Attorney-General’s Department consultation site
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
10 Key learnings
1. Planning is key Planning must address
• Clear intent and objectives
• Choose the right platform to suit objectives
• Moderation policy (light touch important)
• Resources
• Evaluation
Planning should involve three key parties• Senior policy officers – high-level support
• IT/Web technical staff – technically strong and secure
• Communication staff – must be communicative
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
10 Key Learnings
2. Controversial issues can hijack consultation• Minister Conroy’s announcement of proposed internet
filtering (‘Clean Feed’) sent DBDE blog into meltdown
• AG’s site targeted by long-running campaign for an Australian Bill of Rights
• DEWR forum launched amid collapse of the nation’s largest childcare provider, ABC Learning Centres
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
“Prominent Australian bloggers have lashed the Federal Government over its first attempt at public consultation via a blog, which has already been hijacked by critics of its plan to censor the internet.”
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
Online consultation
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
10 Key Learnings
3. Time frame – fast response required• A challenge in Public Service environment
• Guidelines and fast-tracking required
4. Resources• Dedicated staff required to handle large volume of
blog posts, comments, e-mails, etc
5. Culture• Public Service culture presents some challenges
• ‘Champions’ required to change PS culture (UK)
• PS staff also need protection from political blame (UK)
6. Design and navigation• Citizens should not have to know how government
works to find things (UK)
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
10 Key Learnings
7. Language• Citizens should be able to talk in their language
• Policy on slang, swearing, humour, parody, etc
• Flexibility (Macnamara, 2008)
• Voting, seconding, favourites, etc
8. Can be government-hosted or third party – “managed e-citizenship” or “autonomous e-citizenship” (Stephen Coleman, 2008)
• Government sites can be intimidating, remote, unknown
• “Fish where the fish are” – eg. GetUp, NetMums
• Probably need a combination of both
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
10 Key Learnings
9. Specialist sense making tools and processes required – for both government and citizensFor Government For CitizensMonitoring (listening) Background reading
(sidebars)
Stock responses, placeholders
Categorising
Data/text mining Simple voting, supporting
Categorising Editors (summaries)
Argumentation software* Argumentation software** MIT Deliberatorium (formerly Collaboratorium) (Klein 2007)
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
Key Learnings
10. While controversial issues present challenges to open environments, day-to-day consultation and engagement within communities of interest/practice is well suited to online• Museums (eg. War Memorial)
• Arts and cultural organisations
• Austrade
• Basic taxation questions (ATO)
Public consultation and civic engagement required/desirable beyond major policy making
UTS
:T
HIN
K.
CH
AN
GE
. D
O
References
Coleman, S. (2008). Doing IT for themselves: Management versus autonomy in youth e-citizenship. In W. Bennett, Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 189-206). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Department of Finance and Deregulation. (2008). E-democracy community of practice. Retrieved February 1, 2009 from http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/better-practice-and-collaboration/cop/e-democracy.html
Hirst, M., & Harrison, J.( 2007). Communication and new media: From broadcast to narrowcast. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Kearnes, I. (2002). Code red: Progressive politics in the digital age. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Klein, M. (2007). The MIT Collaboratorium: Enabling effective large-scale deliberation for complex problems. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4679-08, 31 December. Retrievefd November 7, 2008 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1085295
Macnamara, J. (2008). Internet media and the public sphere: The 2007 Australian e-electioneering experience, Media International Australia, no. 29, November, pp. 7-19.
UK Cabinet Office. (2009). Power of Information Task Force Report, February. Retrieved April 28, 2009 from http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/reports/power_of_information.aspx