Post on 27-Mar-2015
•
Date 2005-02-10 Name Dr. Roland M. Wagner
Interoperability in a national and international context– implementing SDIs – NRW Case Study AGI Technical SiG Event
London
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 2roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Environment
• from GDI NRW Perspective
• Common Goal: SDI
OGCISO
EU INSPIRE
GSDI
GDI NRW
Federal Mapping Agencies
State Mapping Agencies
Local Mapping Agencies
Private Data
Provider
Private Data
Provider
SoftwareSupplier
Expert Data
Provider
other GDI
Initiatives
Center forGI
Universities
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 3roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
How to organize this environment successfully?
• Different scopes (e.g. local, expert)
• Different capabilities (e.g. IT investment budget and skilled staff)
• Different characteristics (e.g. operator, software supplier)
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 4roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
GDI NRW initial Situation in 1999/2000
• NRW, a German State (1/16), Capital Düsseldorf
• 17 million inhabitants
• GI Domain decentralized within NRW• e.g. 54 Local Mapping Agencies• All worldwide GIS supplier within NRW
• Clear need for interoperability (with a technical solution, not organizational)
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 5roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
GDI NRW First Phase 1999-2003
• Initial 10 SDI projects with some public sponsorship (e.g. GeoMarket.NRW)
• Driven by software suppliers
• SDI components are too complex and risky to be developed by a single company
• Clear need for co-operation
Instrument LocalTestbeds
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 6roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Relationship local - global
Iteration
Business Model
Local GDI NRW
Global OGC/ISO Development
Development
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 7roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Instrument “Local Testbed”
• Preparation in SiGs
• All testbed members must be OGC members
• Formulized with• Open Call for Participation (February)• Deadline (March)• Joint presentation on Fair Intergeo (October)
• Testbed I in 2001
• Testbed II in 2002
• 10 active testbed members
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 8roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Instrument “Local Testbed”
• First Goal: (Re-)Implementation of OGC (Draft) Specifications
• Later Detection of missing pieces, e.g. WPOS and WAAS, first approaches
• No financial sponsorship
• Principle: Exchange of Services• CS-W, WMS, WMS-SLD, WFS, WPOS,
• Marketing platform
• Data Provider/Operator involved as “Supporter” in GDI NRW Testbed II
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 9roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Summery First Phase
• Prove-of-concept of SDI components
• Public demonstrations
• Public education within the self organized SiGs
• Specialized Supplier
• Informal Exchange of Information
• Trust within the supplier community
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 10
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
GDI Second Phase 2004-(2005)
• Goal direct involvement of provider and other operator
• Application field is much wider than some technical implementations
• Sustainability of SDIs only with operators and business models
Instrument JointProjects
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 11
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Instrument “Joint Project”
• Goal: Operation, no new development
• Joint activities:• Catalog / Metadata for data and services and• Marketing• Education• Team Spirit• Information Exchange
• Open Call for Participation in February
• Joint Presentation at Intergeo Fair in October
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 12
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Joint Project 2004
• 25 Projects
• 38 Organizations
• From various application domains
• More than 129 data source contributions • Most via WMS, few WFS
• Strong motivation for local (but “data rich”) municipalities
• Sponsorship (license, cash)
• Coordinated by CeGI, Dortmund
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 13
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Public Presentation Intergeo Stuttgart
• Certificates and later “best 3 projects”
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 14
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Contribution Categories
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 15
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Contributions in Detail• Wind power stations• Wind potential
• Geobasis- und Forestry
• Geomarkting
• ALK (geobasis data)• Heritage Monuments• Soil• Soil Value• Building plans• Building plans -overview• Directmarketing• Noise by Airplanes• FN-Plan• Leisure• Leisure Industry• Industry- und Commercial Areas• Sewer Systems• Klima• Statistic, Municipal• L-Plan• L-Plan-Grenzen• Air quality• Emergency • Settlements• Other municipal Information• Administration borders
Geobasis- und agricultural data
BiotopverbundFFH-GebieteLSGNatural MonumentsNature Protection ZonesSchutzwürdige BiotopeEnvironmentUmweltthemen allg.Bird Protection Zones
Meta dataService Monitoring
DGK5DTK10GeobasisdatenOrthofotosCity Basic MapCity MapTK100TK25TK50
StreetsStreets in NRWStreets, Traffic, Bike streetsTraffic Situation, DisturbancesParking InformationTraffic load
“Fish escalators”WaterWater streamsWater QualityFlood controlFlood protection areasLimnologische SensorsRainPegelTalsperrenWaterwasserhöfigeGebieteWater protection areasWehre
For some data productsmultiple provider=> competition
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 16
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Joint Project 2005 “Networking Business”
• Need for geoDRM functionalities, e.g. Authentication & Authorization, Pricing & Ordering, already evident in 2004
• New data/service contribution welcomed
• License declaration a “must” in 2005
• Goal: license categories (“geoGNU”s)
• Quality of Service/Infrastructure
Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 17
roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de
Conclusion
• “Testbeds” and “Joint Projects” are successful instruments to build up an active SDI environment
• Relationship between activation investments and started investments by members is very good
• Open to share our experiences
Contact: roland.wagner@uni-muenster.de