Accreditation Criteria

What is NCA Accreditation & who is EIUs accrediting body?Assurance to the public that an institution is committed to qualityThe Higher Learning Commission (HLC) of the North Central Association (NCA) of Colleges and Schools

What is the Value of Accreditation? Charts progress since the last accreditationEnsures the University meets national standards of qualityConfirms a culture of continuous improvementPublicly affirms the University's excellenceEnsures access to financial support for studentsAffords funding access to promote scholarship and researchVerifies commitment to future improvements Continues heritage as a top ranked comprehensive institution Provides advice and consultation from experienced evaluators

And we keep our jobsHow can I participate?Check the web site: www.eiu.edu/nca2014Complete the surveyAttend a First Friday SeminarReview and provide feedback on the self-study draftsAttend presentations with an NCA Ambassador, Steering Committee or Subcommittee MemberParticipate in the Site Visit Interviews

First Friday SeminarsLoft of the MLK Union at 7:30 a.m.September 6, 2013 October 4, 2013November 1, 2013December 6, 2013February 7, 2014March 7, 2014April 4, 2014May 2, 2014

What information will I find at the web site?A list of NCA AmbassadorsA list of the Steering Committee and Subcommittee MembersUpdates on the process and invitations to participateSurvey information and instructionsA video and power-point presentation describing the accreditation processCopies of the NCA HandoutProgress updates What are the steps in the process of Accreditation? What is the2013-2014 timeline ?Fall 2013NCA Ambassadors ProgramVisits to Campus Committees, Boards, & CouncilsSurvey and Survey Analysis First Chapter Drafts to Co-Chairs Spring 2014Co-Chairs Submit Revised ChaptersCompleted Chapters to EditorPosting Draft to Campus Incorporation of SuggestionsThird Party Comments

What is the final timeline ?Summer 2014August 25, 2014: Self-Study Submitted

Fall 2014October 20, 21, 22, 2014 Site Visit

Who are the NCA Self Study Co-Chairs and Accreditation Liaison Officer ? Dr. Bob Augustine, Graduate SchoolDr. Jeff Stowell, PsychologyDr. Mary Herrington-Perry, VPAA Office Criterion 1Mission The institution's mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations.The mission is articulated publicly.The institution understands the relationship between its mission and the diversity of society.

Criterion 1 SubcommitteeTerri Frederick & Jennifer Sipes, Co-Chairs John AllisonFaculty, English Isaac SlavenFaculty, Technology Amy RosensteinFaculty, Special Education Steve ScherFaculty, Psychology Brenda MajorUndergraduate AdmissionsBill ElliottGraduate/International Admissions Cindy WhiteCharleston Chamber of Commerce

David CrockettFacilitiesRachel FisherCommunity ServiceRobyn CarrAdvancementCynthia NicholsCivil RightsZeenat Chaudhary, International Undergrad Zachary Samples, Undergraduate Student Kaylia EskewUndergraduate Student

Criterion 2Integrity Ethical & Responsible Conduct The institution operates with integrity in its financial, academic, personnel, and auxiliary functions.The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to the public.The governing board of the institution is sufficiently autonomous to make decisions in the best interest of the institution. The institution is committed to freedom of expression and the pursuit of truth in teaching and learning.The institution ensures that faculty, students, and staff acquire, discover, and apply knowledge responsibly.

Criterion 2 SubcommitteeMarshall Lassak & Linda Holloway, Co-Chairs Andy CheethamFaculty, Music Lisa BrooksFaculty, Family & Consumer SciencesJames KestnerFaculty, Early Childhood, Elementary, Middle Level Ed Doug BrandtFaculty, PhysicsBob ChesnutResearch & Sponsored Programs

Bradley TolppanenBooth Library John HendersonCATSHeather WebbStudent Standards Sandy CoxCounseling CenterEric SchultzAthletics Brandy Woods Undergraduate Student

Criterion 3Teaching & Learning: Quality, Resources & Support The institutions degree programs are appropriate to higher educationThe institution demonstrates that the exercise of intellectual inquiry and the acquisition, application, and integration of broad learning skills are integral to its educational programs. The institution has the faculty and staff needed for effective, high-quality programs and student services. The institution provides support for student learning and effective teaching. The institution fulfills the claims it makes for an enriched educational environment. Criterion 3 SubcommitteeMike Mulvaney and Bonnie Irwin,Co-Chairs Mark BorziFaculty, Communication StudiesKatie ShawFaculty, Family & Consumer Sciences Jackie FrankFaculty, Family & Consumer Sciences Mildred PearsonFaculty, Early Childhood, Elementary, Middle Level Ed Mike CornebiseChair, Geology/GeographyJeanne LordLumpkin Business & Applied SciencesShelley JamesAdvisement Center Kelly HollandStudy Abroad Jerry DonnaFinancial AidKrishna ThomasFaculty DevelopmentKimberlie MoockNew Student Programs Mitch GurickUndergraduate Student

Criterion 4Teaching & Learning: Evaluation and Improvement The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs. The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational achievement and improvement through ongoing assessment of student learning.The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational improvement through ongoing attention to retention, persistence, and completion rates in its degree and certificate programs.Criterion 4 Subcommittee Rebecca Throneburg & Karla Sanders,Co-Chairs Debra ReidFaculty, HistoryCrystal Duncan-LaneFaculty, Family & Consumer SciencesMelissa J-BromenshenkelFaculty Special Education Joy RussellChair Early Childhood, Elementary, Middle Level Ed Amy LynchCollege of SciencesTom SpencerHonors College

Mona DavenportMinority Affairs Josh NormanEnrollment Management David EmmerichInformation TechnologiesJody StoneHousingTyler KalaharGraduate Student Jalyssa WoodallUndergraduate Student

Criterion 5Resources, Planning, and Institutional EffectivenessThe institutions resource base supports its current educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future. The institutions governance and administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the institution to fulfill its mission.The institution engages in systematic and integrated planning.The institution works systematically to improve its performance.Criterion 5 Subcommittee David Boggs & Mike Maurer,Co-ChairsTerry BarnhartFaculty, History Linda SimpsonFaculty, Family & Consumer Sciences Jeanne OkrasinskiFaculty, Early Childhood, Elementary, Middle Level EdAssege HailemariamFaculty, PsychologyGodson ObiaCollege of Sciences David Martin Student Representative

Pam CollinsSchool of Continuing EducationCindy BoyerAcademic Success CenterLynette DrakeHealth Center Steve RichAlumni ServicesDerek MarkleyPresidents Office