Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105 ...€¦ · Supplemental Data. Seo et al....

13
Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886 TTCCAAGAACACAAGCGACTT ELENA1 A B Supplemental Figure 1. Expression level of selected ELENA1 knock down lines by artificial miRNA. (Supports Figure 2) (A) Schematic diagram and amiRNA sequences used to knock down ELENA1 expression. Three tandem copies of the indicated sequence were individually overexpressed under a 35S promoter for the generation of knock down lines. (B) Time course expression of ELENA1 in two independent knock-down mutants upon elf18 treatment (#10 and #20). Transcript levels were normalized to ACT2 expression levels. Bars represent average ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling pools).

Transcript of Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105 ...€¦ · Supplemental Data. Seo et al....

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    TTCCAAGAACACAAGCGACTT

    ELENA1

    A

    B

    Supplemental Figure 1. Expression level of selected ELENA1 knock down lines by artificial miRNA.

    (Supports Figure 2)

    (A) Schematic diagram and amiRNA sequences used to knock down ELENA1 expression. Three tandem

    copies of the indicated sequence were individually overexpressed under a 35S promoter for the generation

    of knock down lines. (B) Time course expression of ELENA1 in two independent knock-down mutants upon

    elf18 treatment (#10 and #20). Transcript levels were normalized to ACT2 expression levels. Bars represent

    average ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling pools).

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    A B

    **

    **

    ****

    ** ** ** **

    Supplemental Figure 2. ELENA1 and PR1 expression level in selected ELENA1 overexpressing lines.

    (Supports Figure 2)

    (A) R l ti i f ELENA1 i 4 diff t 35S ELENA1 t i li d l diti (B)(A) Relative expression of ELENA1 in 4 different 35S:ELENA1 transgenic lines under normal condition. (B)

    Relative expression of PR1 in the four 35S:ELENA1 transgenic lines after 5 µM elf18 treatment. Transcript

    levels were normalized to ACT2 expression levels. Bars represent average ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling

    pools). Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference compared with WT (Col-0). **P < 0.01; two-tailed t

    test.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    A B

    ORF No. Size (bp) aa No.

    1 18 5

    2 132 43

    3 27 8

    A B

    3 27 8

    4 90 29

    5 39 12

    6 111 36

    7 102 33

    8 9 2

    Supplemental Figure 3. Predicted ORFs in ELENA1 transcript. (Supports Figure 3)

    (A) ELENA1 nucleotide sequence and predicted ORFs (under lines) (B) Table showing predicted peptide

    length in each ORF. Five start codons were mutated in ELENA1_5M (gray background) and 8 start codons

    were mutated in ELENA1_8M mutants.

  • A BWT_1hr WT_6hr

    1 253 9520

    (n=1,632)

    WT_6hr(n=1,450)

    1 048 39668

    Up-regulated genes in WT (4,030) Down-regulated genes in WT (3,756)WT_0hr_rep1WT_0hr_rep2WT_0hr_rep3OX_0hr_rep1OX_0hr_rep2

    (n=2,133) (n=1,142)

    WT_1hr

    Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    5351,253 95

    (n=2,662)WT_12h

    325 492

    1,310

    2091,048 396

    (n=2,244)WT_12h

    307 777

    951

    WT_1hr(n=2,274)

    WT_6hr(n=1,284)

    WT_1hr(n=1,491)

    WT_6hr(n=1,254)

    Up-regulated genes in OX (3,850) Down-regulated genes in OX (3,286)

    OX_0hr_rep3WT_1hr_rep1WT_1hr_rep2WT_1hr_rep3OX_1hr_rep1OX_1hr_rep2OX_1hr_rep3WT_6hr_rep1WT_6hr_rep2WT_6hr_rep3OX_6hr_rep1OX 6h 2

    C defense responseinnate immune response

    6031,271 112

    (n=2,427)WT_12h

    40

    360 529

    935

    212968 210

    (n=2,083)WT_12h

    25

    286 807

    778

    OX_6hr_rep2OX_6hr_rep3WT_12hr_rep1WT_12hr_rep2WT_12hr_rep3OX_12hr_rep1OX_12hr_rep2OX_12hr_rep3

    pimmune system process

    immune responseresponse to chitin

    amino acid transportamine transport

    response to other organismcarboxylic acid transport

    organic acid transportresponse to stress

    response to biotic stimulusresponse to stimulus

    multi-organism process

    OXWT

    defense response, incompatible interaction

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70P value (-log10)

    D

    5

    10

    15

    20

    5

    10

    15

    20

    5

    10

    15

    20

    ls (O

    X_12

    hr)

    ls (O

    X_6h

    r)

    s (O

    X_1h

    r)

    ELENA1 ELENA1 ELENA1

    -20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    -20 -10 0 10 20-20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    -20 -10 0 10 20-20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    -20 -10 0 10 20Expression levels (WT_1hr) Expression levels (WT_6hr) Expression levels (WT_12hr)

    Expr

    essi

    on le

    ve

    Expr

    essi

    on le

    ve

    Expr

    essi

    on le

    vels

    Supplemental Figure 4. Global view of ssRNA-seq results. (Supports Figure 4)

    (A) Correlation analysis of all ssRNA-seq samples from normal condition (0h) and elf18-treated conditions (1 h, 6 h

    and 12 h) of WT and ELENA1 OX plant (OX-16). Expression levels (FPKMs) of all detected genes were used for

    hierarchical clustering analysis. (B) Venn diagram showing up- and down-regulated protein coding genes (fold change

    ≥ 2 or ≤ 0.5, P value < 0.05) in WT (top) and OX (bottom). (C) Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of 535 and

    603 co-upregulated protein coding genes. Top 15 (with the lowest P values) enriched GO terms of biological process

    category are shown. (D) Scatter plot showing log2-transformed expression levels (FPKMs) of detected genes in WT (x-

    axis) compared to OX (y-axis). Up-regulated genes, down-regulated genes and non-differentially expressed genes are

    shown in red, blue and black, respectively.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    150

    (kD)

    100

    150

    (kD)

    75

    100

    150

    75

    100

    50

    37

    *

    S l t l Fi 5 ELENA1 i t ith M di t b it i it (S t Fi 5)Supplemental Figure 5. ELENA1 associates with Mediator subunits in vitro. (Supports Figure 5)

    In vitro binding assay with IVT biotinylated ELENA1 RNA and recombinant mediators (MBP-MEDs).

    Proteins were detected with anti-MBP antibody. Asterisk indicates the full-length protein of MBP-MED19a.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    At5g12230(MED19a)

    Mediator subunit SALK_034955(med19a-2)

    A B

    SALK_037435(med19a-1)

    At5g05140(MED26b)

    TFIISelongation factor

    SALK_020870(med26b-1)

    **

    ** **

    **

    C

    ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **

    Supplemental Figure 6. PR1 expression levels in MED19a and MED26a KO mutants after elf18

    treatment. (Supports Figure 5 and 6)

    (A) Schematic diagram of T-DNA insertion sites and Salk line numbers in each mediator knock-out mutants

    (med19a-1, med19a-2, and med26b). (B) Time course of PR1 expression after elf18 treatment in the

    mediator mutants. (C) Time course of MED19a expression after elf18 treatment in the med19a mutants.

    Transcript levels were normalized to ACT2 expression levels. Bars represent average ±SD (n = 3

    independent seedling pools). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences compared with the wild

    type (Col-0). **P < 0.01 two-tailed t test.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    20%INPUT

    ELENA1

    A

    + -+

    Biotinylated sense RNA

    Biotinylated anti sense RNA

    B

    20%INPUT

    ELENA1

    + -+

    non-Biotinylated RNA

    MBP-MED19a

    - + Biotinylated anti-sense RNA

    anti-MBP

    MBP-MED19b

    - + Biotinylated RNA

    anti-MBP

    MBP MBP

    Supplemental Figure 7. ELENA1 associates with both MED19a and MED19b in vitro. (Supports

    Fi 5 d 6)Figure 5 and 6)

    (A) In vitro binding assay with IVT biotinylated ELENA1 RNA and recombinant MED19b protein tagged with

    MBP. (B) In vitro binding between recombinant MBP-MED19a and IVT biotinylated sense or anti-sense

    ELENA1 RNA.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    A B

    *

    ****

    **

    med19a-1med19a-1

    Supplemental Figure 8. PR1 expression levels in med19a/med19b double mutant plants. (Supports Figure 6) (A) PR1 expression levels in med19a-1, MED19b RNAi/med19a-1 (19bi/19a) after elf18 treatment. Bars ( ) p , ( )

    represent average ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling pools). (B) Relative expression of MED19b in 19bi/19a

    transgenic lines (#19). Transcript levels were normalized to ACT2 expression levels. Bars represent

    average ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling pools). Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference. *P

    < 0.05, **P < 0.01; two-tailed t test.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    A B C

    ** ** **

    ** ****

    ** ****

    Supplemental Figure 9. ELENA1 and MED19a expression levels in ELENA1 and MED19a double

    mutants. (Supports Figure 6)

    (A) ELENA1 i i 35S ELENA1/ d19 1 (E1/ 19 ) l t E1#16 i ELENA1 OX 16 (B)(A) ELENA1 expression in 35S:ELENA1/med19a-1 (E1/m19a) plants. E1#16 is ELENA1 OX-16. (B)

    MED19a expression in ELENA1 KD-10/UBQ:MED19a (e1#10/M19a) plants. M19a#1 is UBQ:MED19a-1

    (C) MED19a expression in 35S:ELENA1-16/UBQ:MED19a (E1#16/M19a) plants. Bars represent average

    ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling pools). Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference compared with

    WT (Col-0). **P < 0.01; two-tailed t test.

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    A B

    Supplemental Figure 10. Time course expression of genes neighboring ELENA1 after elf18

    t t ttreatment.

    (A) Relative expression of CBL6 after 5 µM elf18 treatment in the ELENA1 mutants (B) Relative expression

    of AT4g16360 after elf18 treatment in the ELENA1 mutants. For (A) and (B), transcript levels were

    normalized to ACT2 expression levels. Bars represent average ±SD (n = 3 independent seedling pools).

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    Bacteria

    M b

    EFR

    elf18

    Membrane

    (A)nELENA1

    Nucleus

    PR1TF

    MED19aEnrichment

    in PR1 promoter AS-1 like

    MED19a

    Immune responses

    Supplemental Figure 11. A working model of transcriptional regulation of PR1 by ELENA1 in

    Arabidopsis.

    Elf18 (red star) is recognized by EFR receptor and the signal transduced into the nucleus. ELENA1

    transcriptional level was induced by the signal. Association between ELENA1 and MED19a enhances

    MED19a enrichment on the PR1 promoter. Finally, PR1 expression is increased and plant shows disease

    resistance phenotype

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

  • Supplemental Data. Seo et al. (2017). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.16.00886

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile () /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName () /PDFXTrapped /False

    /CreateJDFFile false /Description > /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ > /FormElements false /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles false /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /LeaveUntagged /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ]>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice