Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez School for ... 355 DLP... · Análisis de los fundamentos,...

83
Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez School for Professional Studies Florida Campuses Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, and Universidad del Turabo PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology Psicología Industrial Organizacional © Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, 2010 Derechos Reservados © Ana G. Méndez University System, 2010 All rights reserved January 7, 2011.

Transcript of Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez School for ... 355 DLP... · Análisis de los fundamentos,...

Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez

School for Professional Studies

Florida Campuses

Universidad del Este, Universidad Metropolitana, and Universidad del Turabo

PSYC 355

Industrial Organizational Psychology

Psicología Industrial Organizacional

© Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, 2010

Derechos Reservados

© Ana G. Méndez University System, 2010

All rights reserved

January 7, 2011.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 2

Updated 04/30/2011

TABLA DE CONTENIDO/TABLE OF CONTENTS

Página/Page

GUÍA DE ESTUDIO..................................................................................................................... 3

STUDY GUIDE ........................................................................................................................... 18

TALLER UNO ............................................................................................................................ 32

WORKSHOPS TWO.................................................................................................................. 39

TALLER TRES ........................................................................................................................... 45

WORKSHOP FOUR .................................................................................................................. 53

TALLER CINCO/WORKSHOP FIVE .................................................................................... 59

APPENDIX A: NATIONAL PROFICIENCY LEVELS FOR DIFFERENTIATED

INSTRUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 66

APPENDIX B: THE WRITING PROCESS ............................................................................ 71

APPENDIX C: LANGUAGE LAB AND E-LAB INFORMATION ...................................... 79

APÉNDICE D/APPENDIX D: DEFINICIÓN DE CONCEPTOS / CONCEPT

DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................................................ 82

APÉNDICE E/APPENDIX E: AUTOEVALUACIÓN/SELF-ASSESSMENT .................... 83

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 3

Updated 04/30/2011

GUÍA DE ESTUDIO

Título del Curso: Psicología 355

Codificación: PSYC 355

Duración: 5 semanas

Prerrequisito: Psicología 121-122

Descripción:

Análisis de los fundamentos, teorías, enfoques, técnicas y procedimientos de la conducta

del ser humano dentro del mundo laboral. Estudio de los principios, prácticas,

metodologías, instrumentos y estrategias inherentes al comportamiento en el entorno de

las organizaciones. Evaluación de las condiciones, incidentes propios del entorno laboral

para lograr el éxito de las empresas del nuevo siglo. El curso se llevará a cabo utilizando

el estudio de casos, el análisis crítico de investigaciones recientes, paneles de discusión

temática sobre temas de actualidad relacionados con la psicología industrial en Puerto

Rico y en el resto del mundo.

Objetivos de Contenido Generales:

Al final del curso el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Definir los conceptos de la psicología, psicología industrial y psicología

industrial/organizacional.

2. Reconocer las influencias históricas en el desarrollo de la psicología industrial.

3. Analizar los métodos de la investigación que utiliza la psicología

industrial/organizacional y las normas éticas que la rigen.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 4

Updated 04/30/2011

4. Enumerar los estándares de evaluación para la toma de decisiones en la selección

de personal.

5. Revisar las características de los predictores utilizados para la selección de

personal.

6. Revisar las diferentes estrategias utilizadas en el aprendizaje organizacional.

7. Discutir los usos de la evaluación del desempeño en la organización.

8. Discutir las teorías de las organizaciones, la estructura organizacional y los

procesos del cambio organizacional.

9. Conocer los orígenes de los equipos de trabajo, los tipos de equipo, y su

estructura.

10. Reconocer la importancia de la salud ocupacional en el bienestar del individuo y

su familia.

11. Explicar los conceptos básicos de la motivación y la aplicación de las estrategias

motivacionales en el trabajo.

12. Discutir los principales enfoques teóricos en el estudio del liderazgo y los

sustitutos para el liderazgo.

13. Analizar los aspectos de la diversidad en el estudio de la psicología

industrial/organizacional.

14. Comparar la violencia en el trabajo en el ambiente laboral antiguo y actual.

Objetivos Generales de Lenguaje

a. Escuchar: Reconocer el desarrollo histórico de este campo de estudio y los

métodos de investigación usados en la Psicología Industrial Organizacional.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 5

Updated 04/30/2011

b. Hablar: Presentar y discutir las definiciones y la diferencia entre motivación y

satisfacción laboral.

c. Leer: Analizar el liderazgo y los equipos de trabajo desde una perspectiva

laboral.

d. Escribir: Establecer los patrones de violencia y salud mental en el trabajo.

Requisitos del Laboratorio de Lenguaje o Laboratorio Electrónico: (Tell Me More,

Net Tutor, Wimba Voice, Biblioteca Virtual y Voice E-mail.)

Requisitos Mínimos de Laboratorio de Lenguaje: Los estudiantes deben

demostrar que ellos han cumplido con 20 horas de uso en el laboratorio de

lenguaje (inglés y español) por curso. Esto iguala al uso del laboratorio de

lenguaje por dos horas semanales para cada lenguaje por curso. El facilitador

podría requerir más horas de práctica basada en las necesidades para las destrezas

auditivas, orales, de lectura y escritura en cualquiera de los lenguajes

mencionados. El total de horas de práctica el el laboratorio de lenguaje o e-

lab deben de estar integradas en la sección de actividades del módulo.

Descripción del Proceso de Evaluación: Debe de integrar el uso del laboratorio de

lenguaje o laboratorio de lenguaje electrónico en las rúbricas de evaluación. Las rúbricas

del lenguaje para escuchar, hablar, leer, y escribir se integran en el Evaluación de los

estudiantes. Ver Apéndice A para las rúbricas a usarse. . Para evaluar trabajos escritos

en los dos idiomas, el facilitador deberá usar el “ Writing Process: Six Writing Traits

Rubrics” que aparecen en el Apéndice D.. “Portfolio Performance Assessment” tiene

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 6

Updated 04/30/2011

que ser uno de los instrumentos para evaluar el progreso lingüístico y académico de los

estudiantes. Debido a la naturaleza del modelo bilingüe instruccional, el facilitador tiene

que documentar que el estudiante está progresando hacia la meta de dominar dos idiomas

académicamente. El portfolio tiene que cumplir con los estándares establecidos.

1. Participación y asistencia: La asistencia es obligatoria. El estudiante debe notificar

al facilitador antes de clase de una posible ausencia o tardanza. Las asignaciones

son responsabilidad del estudiante y deben ser entregadas de acuerdo al arreglo

llevado a cabo con el facilitador. Se espera que el estudiante tenga una

participación activa en clase. Ausencias y tardanzas pudiera afectar negativamente

la nota final del estudiante.

2. Definición de conceptos: El estudiante tendrá una lista de conceptos para cada

taller, con un total de 5 listas para el curso. El estudiante desarrollará las

definiciones en sus propias palabras después de haber hecho una revisión de

literatura. Estas 5 listas de conceptos serán parte del portafolio a entregar en el

taller 5.

3. Análisis de casos: El estudiante hará un análisis de caso al final de los talleres 1, 2,

3 y 4. El estudiante analizará cada escenario y discutirá una posible solución al

problema desde su perspectiva profesional en el área de psicología industrial

organizacional. Estos 4 análisis de caso serán parte del portafolio a entregar en el

taller 5.

4. Auto evaluaciones: El estudiante tendrá la oportunidad de evaluar su trabajo y su

participación al final de cada clase. Estas 5 evaluaciones serán incluidas en el

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 7

Updated 04/30/2011

portafolio.

5. Ensayos: El estudiante escribirá 5 ensayos.

a. Taller 1: Eventos históricos

b. Taller 2: La medición psicológica

c. Taller 3: Cambios en la organización

d. Taller 4: La motivación en el trabajo

e. Taller 5: Drogas y alcohol en el trabajo

6. Trabajo escrito grupal: El facilitador dividirá la clase en grupos de no más de 4

estudiantes. El facilitador asignará un tema a cada grupo. El proyecto será

entregado en el Taller 5; sólo un trabajo escrito por grupo deberá ser entregado.

Los temas a ser asignados serán: Motivación en el trabajo, Satisfacción en el

trabajo, Liderazgo y Ergonomía. Este trabajo se escribirá en inglés.

7. Trabajo oral grupal: Cada grupo asignado a un trabajo escrito desarrollará una

presentación oral que será presentada en el Taller 5. Esta presentación se hará en

español.

8. Portafolio: El portafolio será entregado al facilitador denle el taller 5 e incluirá lo

siguiente:

A. 5 listas de definición de conceptos

B. 4 análisis de caso

C. 5 auto evaluaciones

D. 5 ensayos

E. Trabajo escrito grupal

F. Copia del trabajo oral grupal

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 8

Updated 04/30/2011

G. Escala Evaluativa:

Criterio de Evaluación Porcentage (%) Puntos

Participación y Asistencia, Laboratorio de

Lenguas/E-Lab

10% 100

Definición de Conceptos 10% 125

Análisis de Casos 10% 100

Auto evaluaciones 10% 100

Ensayos 10% 100

Portafolio 10% 100

Proyecto Escrito Grupal 20% 50

Proyecto Oral Grupal 20% 50

Escala:

A = 100 – 90% B= 89 – 80% C= 79 – 70% D= 69 – 60% F = 59% o menos

Requisitos de APA (versión 6) para citar los Textos a Usarse en el Módulo

Para los Textos Recomendados y Recursos utilice el estilo APA (6ª. Ed.). Incluya al

menos un libro electrónico de la Biblioteca Virtual http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

La fecha de publicación de un libro no deberá ser mayor de 5 años según lo exige la

Comisión de Educación Independiente de la Florida.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 9

Updated 04/30/2011

Libro(s)

Muchinsky, P.M. (2009). Psychology Applied to Work: An Introduction to Industrial and

Organizational Psychology. (9th

ed.). USA: Hypergraphic Press. ISBN 13:

9780980147803

Riggio, R.E. (2008). Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology. (5th

ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 13: 9780136009900

Krumm, D. (2009). Psychology at Work: An Introduction to Industrial/Organizational

Psychology. (3rd

ed.). Worth Pub. ISBN 13: 9781572596597

Zedeck, S. (2010). APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Apa

Handbooks in Psychology) 3 Volume Set. American Psychological Association. ISBN

13: 9781433807275

Robertson, I.& Cooper, C.L. (2003). Organizational Psychology & Development: Key

Topics for Students and Practitioners (Key Issues in Industrial & Organizational

Psychology) John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 0471495565

Cooper, C.L. & Locke, E.A. (2000). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Linking

Theory with Practice (Blackwell Business) ISBN 13: 9780631209928

Lowenberg, G.& Conrad, K.A. (1997). Current Perspectives inIndustrial/Organizational

Psychology Allyn & Bacon. ISBN 13: 9780205142521

Landy, F.L. & Conte J.M. (2009). Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to

Industrial and Organizational Psychology : (2nd ed.) McGraw-Hill ISBN 13:

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 10

Updated 04/30/2011

9780072830224

Schultz, D. & Schultz, S.E. (2009) Psychology and Work Today (10th ed.) Pearson

College Division. ISBN 0205683584

Lowman, R.L.,Lefkowitz, J., Mcintyre, R. & Tippins, N. (2006). The Ethical Practice of

Psychology in Organizations (Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology

(SIOP)). (2nd

Ed.). American Psychological Association. ISBN: 978-1-59147-353-4

Prien, K.O. & Schippmann, J.S. (2003). Individual Assessment: As Practiced in Industry

and Consulting (Applied Psychology Series) Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN:

9780805839753

Eisenberger, R. & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering

Enthusiastic and Productive Employees American Psychological Association. ISBN:

9781433809330

Pinder, C. C. (2008). Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. (2nd

ed.) Psychology

Press. ISBN 0805856048

Hedge, J.W. & Borman, W.C. (2008). The I/O Consultant: Advice and Insights for

Building a Successful Career. American Psychological Association. ISBN

1433803399

Descripción de las Normas del Curso

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 11

Updated 04/30/2011

1. Este curso sigue el modelo “Discipline-Based Dual Language Immersion

Model®” del Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez, el mismo está diseñado para

promover el desarrollo de cada estudiante como un profesional bilingüe. Cada

taller será facilitado en inglés y español, utilizando el modelo 50/50. Esto

significa que cada taller deberá ser conducido enteramente en el lenguaje

especificado. Los lenguajes serán alternados en cada taller para asegurar que el

curso se ofrece 50% en inglés y 50% en español. Para mantener un balance, el

módulo debe especificar que se utilizarán ambos idiomas en el quinto taller,

dividiendo el tiempo y las actividades equitativamente entre ambos idiomas. Las

primeras dos horas son estrictamente en español y las últimas dos en inglés.

Los cursos de lenguaje deben ser desarrollados en el idioma correspondiente, en

inglés o en español, según aplique.

2. El curso es conducido en formato acelerado y bilingüe, esto requiere que los

estudiantes sean sumamente organizados, enfocados y que se preparen antes de

cada taller de acuerdo al módulo. El estudiante debe hacer todo esfuerzo para

desarrollar las destrezas en los dos idiomas usando los recursos de lenguaje

disponibles en y fuera de la institución. Convertirse en un profesional bilingüe es

un proceso complejo y retador. Cada taller requiere un promedio de diez (10)

horas de preparación y en ocasiones requiere más para poder tener éxito

lingüístico y académico.

3. La asistencia a todos los talleres es obligatoria. El estudiante que se ausente al

taller deberá presentar una excusa razonable al facilitador. El facilitador evaluará

si la ausencia es justificada y decidirá como el estudiante repondrá el trabajo

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 12

Updated 04/30/2011

perdido, de ser necesario. El facilitador puede elegir una de estas dos alternativas:

(a) permitirle al estudiante reponer el trabajo o (b) asignarle trabajo adicional

además del trabajo que el estudiante tiene que reponer.

Toda tarea a ser completada antes del taller deberá ser entregada en la fecha

asignada. El facilitador ajustará la nota de las tareas repuestas.

4. Si un estudiante se ausenta a más de un taller el facilitador tendrá las

siguientes opciones:

a. Si es a dos talleres, el facilitador reducirá la nota existente en un

grado.

b. Si el estudiante se ausenta a tres talleres, el facilitador reducirá la

nota existente en dos grados.

5. La asistencia y participación en clase de actividades y presentaciones orales es

extremadamente importante pues no se pueden reponer. Si el estudiante provee

una excusa válida y verificable, el facilitador determinará una actividad

equivalente a evaluar que sustituya la misma. Esta actividad deberá incluir el

mismo contenido y componentes del lenguaje como la presentación oral o

actividad a ser repuesta.

6. En actividades grupales, el grupo será evaluado por su trabajo final. Sin embargo,

cada miembro de grupo deberá participar y cooperar para lograr un trabajo de

excelencia. Los estudiantes también recibirán una calificación individual.

7. Se espera que todo trabajo escrito sea de la autoría de cada estudiante y no

plagiado. Se requiere que todo trabajo sometido al facilitador cumpla con las

reglas para citar apropiadamente o que esté parafraseado y citado dando crédito al

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 13

Updated 04/30/2011

autor. Todo estudiante debe ser el autor de su propio trabajo. Todo trabajo que

sea plagiado, copiado o presente trazos del trabajo de otro estudiante o autor será

calificado con cero. El servicio de SafeAssign TM

de Blackboard será utilizado

por los facilitadores para verificar la autoría de los trabajos escritos de los

estudiantes. Es responsabilidad del estudiante el leer la política de plagio de su

universidad. Si usted es estudiante de UT, deberá leer la Sección 11.1 del Manual

del Estudiante. Si es estudiante de UMET y UT, refiérase al Capítulo 13,

secciones 36 y 36.1 de los respectivos manuales.

Se espera un comportamiento ético en todas las actividades del curso. Esto

implica que TODOS los trabajos tienen que ser originales y que para toda

referencia utilizada deberá indicarse la fuente, bien sea mediante citas o

bibliografía utilizando el estilo APA (6ª. ed.). No se tolerará el plagio y, en caso

de que se detecten casos del mismo, el estudiante se expone a recibir cero en el

trabajo y a ser referido al Comité de Disciplina de la institución. Los estudiantes

deben observar aquellas prácticas dirigidas a evitar incurrir en el plagio de

documentos y trabajos pues va en contra de la ética profesional.

8. Para el facilitador poder hacer cambios a las actividades del módulo o guía de

estudio, éstos deberán ser aprobados por el Director de Facultad y Currículo antes

de la primera clase. Es requisito que el facilitador discuta y entregue una copia

de los cambios a los estudiantes al principio del primer taller.

9. El facilitador establecerá los medios para contactar a los estudiantes proveyendo

su correo electrónico de SUAGM, teléfonos, día y horario disponibles.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 14

Updated 04/30/2011

10. El uso de celulares está prohibido durante las sesiones de clase; de haber una

necesidad, deberá permanecer en vibración o en silencio.

11. La visita de niños y familiares no registrados en el curso no está permitida en el

salón de clases.

12. Todo estudiante está sujeto a las políticas y normas de conducta y

comportamiento que rigen al SUAGM, al curso y a un adulto profesional.

Nota: Si por alguna razón no puede acceder las direcciones electrónicas ofrecidas en el

módulo, notifique al facilitador pero no se limite a ellas. Existen otros motores de

búsqueda y sitios Web que podrá utilizar para la búsqueda de la información deseada.

Entre ellas están:

www.google.com

www.ask.com

www.pregunta.com

www.findarticles.com

www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu

www.eric.ed.gov/

www.flelibrary.org/

http://www.apastyle.org/

Para comprar o alquilar libros de texto o referencias nuevas o usadas puede visitar:

http://www.chegg.com/ (alquiler)

http://www.bookswim.com/ (alquiler)

http://www.allbookstores.com/ (compra)

http://www.alibris.com/ (compra)

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 15

Updated 04/30/2011

Éstos son sólo algunos enlaces de las muchas compañías donde se pueden comprar o

alquilar libros.

El facilitador puede realizar cambios a las direcciones electrónicas y/o añadir otras de

índole profesional y que contengan las investigaciones más recientes del tema del

módulo, de ser necesario.

CUMPLIMIENTO DE LA LEY DE INVESTIGACIÓN:

Del facilitador o el estudiante requerir o desear una investigación o la

administración de cuestionarios o entrevistas, deben referirse a las normas y

procedimientos de la Oficina de Cumplimiento y solicitar su autorización. Para

acceder a los formularios de la Oficina de Cumplimiento pueden visitar este enlace:

http://www.suagm.edu/ac_aa_re_ofi_formularios.asp y seleccionar los formularios

que necesite. Además de los formularios el estudiante/facilitador puede encontrar

las instrucciones para la certificación en línea. Estas certificaciones incluyen: IRB

Institutional Review Board, Health Information Portability Accounting Act

(HIPAA), y Responsibility Conduct for Research Act (RCR).

De tener alguna duda, favor de comunicarse con las Coordinadoras Institucionales o a la

Oficina de Cumplimiento a los siguientes teléfonos:

Sra. Evelyn Rivera Sobrado, Directora Oficina de Cumplimiento

Tel. (787) 751-0178 Ext. 7196

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 16

Updated 04/30/2011

Srta. Carmen Crespo, Coordinadora Institucional Cumplimiento – UMET

Tel. (787) 766-1717 Ext. 6366

Sra. Josefina Melgar, Coordinadora Institucional Cumplimiento – Turabo

Tel. (787) 743-7979 Ext.4126

Dra. Rebecca Cherry, Coordinadora Institucional Cumplimiento - UNE

Tel. (787) 257-7373 Ext. 3936

Filosofía y Metodología Educativa

Este curso está basado en la filosofía educativa del Constructivismo. El

Constructivismo es una filosofía de aprendizaje fundamentada en la premisa, de que,

reflexionando a través de nuestras experiencias, podemos construir nuestro propio

entendimiento sobre el mundo en el que vivimos.

Cada uno de nosotros genera sus propias “reglas “y “modelos mentales” que

utilizamos para darle sentido a nuestras experiencias. Aprender, por lo tanto, es

simplemente el proceso de ajustar nuestros modelos mentales para poder entender nuevas

experiencias.

Como facilitadores, nuestro enfoque es el de mantener una conexión entre los

hechos con las experiencias y fomentar un nuevo entendimiento en los estudiantes.

También, intentamos adaptar nuestras estrategias de enseñanza a las respuestas de

nuestros estudiantes y motivar a los mismos a analizar, interpretar, predecir información

y aplicarla a la vida diaria.

PRINCIPIOS DEL CONSTRUCTIVISMO:

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 17

Updated 04/30/2011

1. El aprendizaje es una búsqueda de significados, por lo tanto, el aprendizaje debe

comenzar con situaciones en las cuales los estudiantes estén buscando activamente

construir un significado.

2. Para construir “un significado” se requiere comprender todas las partes: globales y

específicas (“from whole to parts”). Ambas partes deben entenderse en el contexto

del todo. Por lo tanto, el proceso de aprendizaje se enfoca en los conceptos primarios

en contexto y no en hechos aislados.

3. Para enseñar bien, debemos entender los modelos mentales que los estudiantes

utilizan para percibir el mundo y las presunciones que ellos hacen para apoyar dichos

modelos.

4. El propósito del aprendizaje, es para un individuo, el construir su propio significado,

no sólo memorizar las contestaciones “correctas” y repetir el significado de otra

persona. Como la educación es intrínsecamente interdisciplinaria, la única forma

válida para asegurar el aprendizaje es hacer del Evaluación parte esencial de dicho

proceso, asegurando que el mismo provea a los estudiantes con la información sobre

la calidad de su aprendizaje.

5. La evaluación debe servir como una herramienta de auto-análisis.

6. Proveer herramientas y ambientes que ayuden a los estudiantes a interpretar las

múltiples perspectivas que existen en el mundo.

7. El aprendizaje debe ser controlado internamente y analizado por el estudiante.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 18

Updated 04/30/2011

STUDY GUIDE

Course Title: Industrial/Organizational Psychology

Code: Psyc 355

Time Length: 5 weeks

Pre-requisite: Psyc 121-122

Description:

Analysis of the foundations, theories, approaches, techniques and procedures of the

human behavior within the context of the labor world. Study of the principles, practices,

methodologies, instruments and strategies inherent in the organization scenario.

Evaluation of the conditions and peculiar incidents of the organizations to help

corporations of the new millennium achieve success. This course will be completed

utilizing case studies, critic analysis from recent research and discussion panels over

current topics related to the field of industrial psychology in Puerto Rico and the rest of

the world.

General Content Objectives:

1. Define the concepts of psychology, industrial psychology and

industrial/organizational psychology.

2. Recognize the historic influences in the development of industrial psychology as a

field.

3. Analyze the research methods used in the industrial/organizational psychology

field and the ethics that govern it.

4. List the evaluation standards used to make hiring decisions.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 19

Updated 04/30/2011

5. Revise the predictor characteristics used in the hiring process.

6. Revise the different strategies used in the organizational learning process.

7. Discuss the uses of the performance appraisal in organizations.

8. Discuss the theories of organizations, the organizational structure and the

processes in organizational changes.

9. Recognize the basis of the team works, types of teams and its structure.

10. Recognize the importance of the occupational health in the individual’s well

being and his family.

11. Explain the concept of motivation and the motivational strategies used in the

workplace.

12. Discuss the different approaches in the study of leadership and the substitutes

for it.

13. Analyze diversity in the study of industrial/organizational psychology.

14. Compare the violence in the workplace in the past and the present.

General Language Objectives

a. Listening: Recognize the historic development and the research methods

used in Industrial Organizational Psychology.

b. Speaking: Present and discuss the definitions and the difference between

motivation and satisfaction at work.

c. Reading: Analyze leadership and teamwork from a work related

perspective.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 20

Updated 04/30/2011

d. Writing: Establish the patters in violence and mental health in the

workplace.

E-Lab (Language Lab) Requirements (Tell Me More, Net Tutor, Wimba Voice, Virtual

Library, & Voice E-mail.)

Language Lab Minimum Requirement: Students must demonstrate that they

have complied with 20 hours of language lab or e-lab usage for each language (10

hours in English and 10 hours in Spanish) per course. This equates to the use of

the language lab or e-lab for two hours weekly for each language per course.

The facilitator may require a higher number of hours for language lab practice

based on the language needs for listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills in

either or both languages. The total amount of language lab or e-lab hours is

integrated in the activities for each workshop in the module.

Description of the Evaluation Process: Integrate the use of the language lab and e-lab to

all evaluation rubrics used in the instructional module. The language rubrics for listening,

speaking, reading, and writing provided in Appendix A are integrated to assess student

performance in all courses. The Writing Process: Six Writing Traits Rubrics provided in

Appendix D must be used to evaluate all writing activities in both languages in all

courses. Portfolio Performance Assessment must be one of the evaluation instruments

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 21

Updated 04/30/2011

used in the module and throughout the content of all workshops and appendices. This

instrument must follow established guidelines. Due to the nature of our dual language

instructional model, documentation must be provided on the growth of students towards

mastery of linguistic and academic skills in both languages (English and Spanish.)

Scale:

Evaluation Criteria Percentage (%) Points

Attendance and Participation 10% 100

Concepts definition 10% 125

Case analisis 10% 100

Self evaluation 10% 100

Essays 10% 100

Portfolio 10% 100

Group Written Project 20% 50

Group Oral Presentation 20% 50

1. Attendance and participation: Attendance is mandatory. The student should notify

the facilitator before class of any absence and/or late arrival. The assignments are

the student’s responsibility and is expected that all assignments will be turned in a

timely manner as agreed upon with the facilitator. It is expected that the student

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 22

Updated 04/30/2011

will actively participate in class. Absences and lateness may have a negative

impact in the final grade. (Appendix B)

2. Concepts definition: Students will have a list of concepts for each workshop for a

grand total of five lists. Students will develop the definitions after conducting the

revision of literature and will complete Appendix for each workshop. These five

lists of concepts will be included in the portfolio. (Appendix A)

3. Case analysis: A case analysis will be provided at the end of workshops 1, 2, 3 and

4. The students will analyze each scenario and will provide a solution as

professionals in the field of industrial organizational psychology. These four

analyses will be included in the portfolio. (Appendix C)

4. Self evaluation: The students will have the opportunity to review their own work

and participation after each class. These five evaluations will be included in the

portfolio. (Appendix D)

5. Essays: the students will do a total of essays. (Appendix E)

a. Workshop 1: Historic events

b. Workshop 2: Psychological assessments

c. Workshop 3: Changes in the organization

d. Workshop 4: Motivation

e. Workshop 5: Drugs and alcohol in the workplace

6. Group written project: the facilitator will divide the class in groups of no more than

four students and will assign the topic for the written project which will be turned

in workshop 5. The topics to be assigned are: work motivation, job satisfaction,

leadership, and ergonomics. This project will be completed in English. (Appendix

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 23

Updated 04/30/2011

G)

7. Group oral presentation: groups assigned to work on the written project will

conduct an oral presentation to expose the findings of their written project. This

presentation will be conducted in Spanish. (Appendix F)

8. Portfolio: the portfolio will be turned in to the facilitator no later than workshop 5

and will include the following:

a. 5 Concepts definitions

b. 4 case analysis

c. 5 self evaluation

d. 5 essays

e. Group written project

f. Copy of the oral presentation

Other:

Requirements for the Use of APA (version 6) for Citations of Textbooks

For Recommended Texts and Resources, Use APA style version 6. Include at least ONE

e-book from the Virtual Library at http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

Textbooks must have a publication date of 5 years as required by the Florida

Commission of Independent Learning.

Book(s)

Muchinsky, P.M. (2009). Psychology Applied to Work: An Introduction to Industrial and

Organizational Psychology. (9th

ed.). USA: Hypergraphic Press. ISBN 13:

9780980147803

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 24

Updated 04/30/2011

Riggio, R.E. (2008). Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology. (5th

ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 13: 9780136009900

Krumm, D. (2009). Psychology at Work: An Introduction to Industrial/Organizational

Psychology. (3rd

ed.). Worth Pub. ISBN 13: 9781572596597

Zedeck, S. (2010). APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Apa

Handbooks in Psychology) 3 Volume Set. American Psychological Association. ISBN

13: 9781433807275

Robertson, I.& Cooper, C.L. (2003). Organizational Psychology & Development: Key

Topics for Students and Practitioners (Key Issues in Industrial & Organizational

Psychology) John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 0471495565

Cooper, C.L. & Locke, E.A. (2000). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Linking

Theory with Practice (Blackwell Business) ISBN 13: 9780631209928

Lowenberg, G.& Conrad, K.A. (1997). Current Perspectives inIndustrial/Organizational

Psychology Allyn & Bacon. ISBN 13: 9780205142521

Landy, F.L. & Conte J.M. (2009). Work in the 21st Century: An Introduction to

Industrial and Organizational Psychology: (2nd ed.) McGraw-Hill ISBN 13:

9780072830224

Schultz, D. & Schultz, S.E. (2009) Psychology and Work Today (10th ed.) Pearson

College Division. ISBN 0205683584

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 25

Updated 04/30/2011

Lowman, R.L.,Lefkowitz, J., Mcintyre, R. & Tippins, N. (2006). The Ethical Practice of

Psychology in Organizations (Society for Industrial & Organizational Psychology

(SIOP)). (2nd

Ed.). American Psychological Association. ISBN: 978-1-59147-353-4

Prien, K.O. & Schippmann, J.S. (2003). Individual Assessment: As Practiced in Industry

and Consulting (Applied Psychology Series) Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN:

9780805839753

Eisenberger, R. & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived Organizational Support: Fostering

Enthusiastic and Productive Employees American Psychological Association. ISBN:

9781433809330

Pinder, C. C. (2008). Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior. (2nd

ed.) Psychology

Press. ISBN 0805856048

Hedge, J.W. & Borman, W.C. (2008). The I/O Consultant: Advice and Insights for

Building a Successful Career. American Psychological Association. ISBN 1433803399

.

E-Book (s)

Description of Course Policies

1. This course follows the Sistema Universitario Ana G. Méndez Discipline-Based

Dual Language Immersion Model® designed to promote each student’s

development as a Dual Language Professional. Workshops will be facilitated in

either English or Spanish, strictly using the 50/50 model. This means that each

workshop will be conducted entirely in the language specified for the workshop. The

language used in each workshop needs to be alternated to insure that 50% of the

course is conducted in English and 50% in Spanish. To maintain this balance, the

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 26

Updated 04/30/2011

course module will indicate that both languages must be used during the fifth

workshop, dividing the workshop activities between the two languages. The first two

hours will be in Spanish and the last two hours in English. The 50/50 model does

not apply to language courses where the delivery of instruction must be conducted in

the language taught (Spanish or English only).

2. The course is conducted in an accelerated and dual language format. This requires

that students prepare in advance for each workshop according to the course module.

Students must be structured, organized, committed, and focused to ensure linguistic

and academic success. In order to achieve proficiency expectations in English and in

Spanish, the student must strive to take advantage of all language resources in the

university and in their community since becoming a dual language professional is a

complex and challenging task. Each workshop requires an average of ten hours of

preparation, but could require more.

3. Attendance to all class sessions is mandatory. A student who is absent to a workshop

must present a reasonable excuse to the facilitator who in turn will evaluate the reason

for the absence. If it is justified, the facilitator will decide how the student will make

up the missing work, if applicable. The facilitator will decide on the following: allow

the student to make up the work, or allow the student to make up the work and assign

extra work to compensate for the missing class time.

Assignments required prior to the workshop must be completed and turned in on the

assigned date. The facilitator may decide to adjust the grade given for late

assignments and/or make-up work.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 27

Updated 04/30/2011

4. If a student is absent to more than one workshop, the facilitator will have the

following options:

g. If a student misses two workshops, the facilitator may lower one grade

level based on the student’s existing grade.

h. If the student misses three workshops, the facilitator may lower two

grade levels based on the student’s existing grade.

5. Student attendance and participation in oral presentations and special class activities

are extremely important as it is not possible to assure that they can be made up. If the

student provides a valid and verifiable excuse, the facilitator may determine a

substitute evaluation activity if he/she understands that an equivalent activity is

possible. This activity must include the same content and language components as the

oral presentation or special activity that was missed.

6. In cooperative learning activities, the group will be assessed for their final work as a

group. However, each member will have to collaborate to assure the success of the

group. Students will also receive an individual grade for their work.

7. It is expected that all written work will be solely that of the student and should not be

plagiarized. That is, the student must be the author of all work submitted. All quoted

or paraphrased material must be properly cited, with credit given to its author or

publisher. It should be noted that plagiarized writings are easily detectable and

students should not risk losing credit for material that is clearly not their own.

SafeAssignTM

, a Blackboard plagiarism deterrent service, will be used by the

facilitators to verify students’ ownership of written assignments. It is the

student’s responsibility to read the university’s plagiarism policy. If you are a UT

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 28

Updated 04/30/2011

student, read Section 11.1 of the Student Manual, and if you belong to UMET or

UNE, refer to Chapter 13, Sections 36 and 36.1 of the respective manuals.

Ethical behavior is expected from the students in all course related activities. This

means that ALL papers submitted by the student must be original work, and that all

references used will be properly cited or mentioned in the bibliography. Plagiarism

will not be tolerated and, in case of detecting an incidence, the student will obtain a

zero in the assignment or activity and could be referred to the Discipline Committee.

8. In order for the Facilitator to make changes to activities and the study guide, the

Faculty and Curriculum Director must approve such changes before the first day of

class. The Facilitator must discuss the approved changes with students in the first

class workshop. A written copy of the changes must also be provided to students at

the beginning of the first workshop.

9. The facilitator will establish a means of contacting students by providing the SUAGM

e-mail address, phone number, hours to be contacted, and days available.

10. The use of cellular phones is prohibited during sessions; if there is a need to have one,

it must be on vibrate or silent mode during class session.

11. Children or family members that are not registered in the course are not allowed to

the classrooms.

12. All students are subject to the policies regarding behavior at the university

community established by the institution, and in this course.

Note: If for any reason you cannot access the URL’s presented in the module, notify the

facilitator immediately but do not stop your investigation. There are many search engines

and other links you can use to search for information. These are some examples:

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 29

Updated 04/30/2011

www.google.com

www.ask.com

www.pregunta.com

www.findarticles.com

www.bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu

www.eric.ed.gov/

www.flelibrary.org/

http://www.apastyle.org/

To buy or rent new or used textbooks or references you can visit:

http://www.chegg.com/ (rent)

http://www.bookswim.com/ (rent)

http://www.allbookstores.com/ (buy)

http://www.alibris.com/ (buy)

The facilitator may make changes or add additional challenging, research-based, and

professional educational Web Resources, if deemed necessary to reflect current trends in

the course topics.

RESEARCH LAW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENT:

If the facilitator or the student is required, or wants to perform a research, or needs

to administer a questionnaire or an interview individuals, he/she must comply with

the norms and procedures of the Institutional Review Board Office (IRB) and ask

for authorization. To access the forms from the IRB Office or for additional

information, visit the following link:

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 30

Updated 04/30/2011

http://www.suagm.edu/ac_aa_re_ofi_formularios.asp and select the forms needed.

Furthermore, in this Web site the student/facilitator will find instructions for

several online certifications related to IRB processes. These certifications include:

IRB Institutional Review Board, Health Information Portability Accounting Act

(HIPAA), and the Responsibility Conduct for Research Act (RCR).

If you have any questions, please contact the following institutional coordinators:

Mrs. Evelyn Rivera Sobrado, Director of IRB Office (PR)

Tel. (787) 751-0178 Ext. 7196

Miss. Carmen Crespo, IRB Institutional Coordinator– UMET

Tel. (787) 766-1717 Ext. 6366

Sra. Josefina Melgar, IRB Institutional Coordinator – Turabo

Tel. (787) 743-7979 Ext.4126

Rebecca Cherry, Ph.D., IRB Institutional Coordinator - UNE

Tel. (787) 257-7373 Ext. 3936

Teaching Philosophy and Methodology

The activities for the course reflect the educational philosophy of Constructivism.

Constructivism is an educational philosophy founded on the premise that, by reflecting

on our experiences, we construct our own understanding of the world in which we live.

Each of us generates our own “rules” and “mental models,” which we use to make

sense of our experiences. Learning, therefore, is simply the process of adjusting our

mental models to accommodate new experiences.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 31

Updated 04/30/2011

One of the main goals facilitators have is assisting students in making connections

between their prior knowledge of facts, and fostering new understanding that is relevant

to real live experiences. We will also attempt to tailor our teaching strategies to student

responses and encourage students to analyze, interpret, and predict information.

CONSTRUCTIVISM GUIDING PRINCIPLES:

1. Learning is a search for meaning. Therefore, learning must start with the issues

around which students are actively trying to construct meaning.

2. Meaning requires understanding “wholes” as well as “parts”. The “parts” must be

understood in the context of “wholes”. Therefore, the learning process focuses on

primary concepts, not isolated facts.

3. In order to teach well, we must understand the mental models that students use to

perceive the world, and the assumptions they make to support those models.

4. The purpose of learning is for an individual to construct his or her own meaning, not

just memorize the "right" answers and regurgitate someone else's meaning. Since

education is inherently interdisciplinary, the only valuable way to measure learning is

to make assessment part of the learning process, thus ensuring that it provides

students with information on the quality of their learning.

5. Evaluation should serve as a self-analysis tool.

6. Provide tools and environments that help learners interpret the multiple perspectives

of the world.

7. Learning should be internally controlled and mediated by the learner.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 32

Updated 04/30/2011

TALLER UNO

Objetivos específicos de contenido:

Al final del Taller Uno el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Definir Psicología Industrial Organizacional

2. Explicar donde y cómo es usada la psicología industrial organizacional.

3. Explicar cómo la psicología industrial organizacional está relacionada al campo de la

psicología.

4. Identificar y explicar cada una de las diferentes áreas de estudio dentro del campo de la

psicología industrial organizacional.

5. Describir y discutir la historia de la psicología industrial organizacional.

6. Identificar y discutir los métodos de investigación utilizados en la psicología industrial

organizacional.

Objetivos específicos de lenguaje:

Al final del Taller Uno el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Escuchar: Entender por medio de la presentación oral conducida por el facilitador la

definición de psicología industrial organizacional y explicar en qué consiste.

2. Hablar: Diferenciar por medio de la presentación hecha en clase, los distintos

métodos de investigación utilizados en la psicología industrial organizacional.

3. Leer: Comprender la importancia de conducir una investigación válida y confiable

mediante la revisión de literatura.

4. Escribir: Demostrar por medio del desarrollo de un ensayo la importancia de los

eventos acontecidos que generaron el desarrollo de la psicología industrial

organizacional.

Enlaces electrónicos:

Biblioteca Virtual

http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

Definición e historia de la psicología industrial

http://www.siop.org/History/historynew.aspx

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 33

Updated 04/30/2011

http://www.conductitlan.net/seminarios/psicologia_industrial.pdf

http://www.slideshare.net/Lilyastacio/roles-y-funciones-del-psicologo-industrial1

http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Inc-Int/Industrial-Organizational-

Psychology.html

http://frank.mtsu.edu/~pmccarth/io_hist.htm

Análisis de Psicología Industrial/organizacional

http://psicologias.uprrp.edu/rol1-1/rol1-1-PDF-files/rol1-1-monografias-1.pdf

Historia de la psicología industrial/organizacional

http://historiadelapsicologiaorganizacional.blogspot.com/

Métodos de investigación

http://www.rrppnet.com.ar/tecnicasdeinvestigacion.htm

http://www.uprm.edu/socialsciences/psic3001/investigacion.pdf

http://psy1.clarion.edu/mm/General/Methods/Methods.html

Recursos en el área de psicología industrial organizacional

http://psych.athabascau.ca/html/aupr/industrial.shtml

Asignaciones antes del taller:

El estudiante deberá hacer lo siguiente:

1. Leer los enlaces electrónicos recomendados, libros de texto y materiales de referencia.

Prestar atención a las rúbricas a ser utilizadas para evaluar su desempeño en este taller.

2. Definir y explicar los siguientes conceptos:

a. Psicología

b. Psicología Industrial Organizacional

c. SIOP (Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology)

d. Army General Classification Test

e. Estudios Hawthorne

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 34

Updated 04/30/2011

f. diversidad

3. Conducir una revisión de literatura y venir a clase preparado a discutir la contribución

de los siguientes teóricos al campo de la Sicología Industrial organizacional: Hugo

Munsterberg, Frederick Taylor, Walter Dill Scott y Robert Yerkes.

4. Escribir un ensayo detallando e identificando los eventos históricos ocurridos que

impactaron el desarrollo de la psicología industrial organizacional como un campo de

estudio.

5. Buscar información sobre los siguientes métodos de investigación y venir a clase

preparado para discutir y participar en un debate sobre sus consideraciones legales y

éticas:

a. Observación

b. Cuestionarios

c. Encuestas

d. Investigación Experimental

e. Estudios de Casos

Vocabulario clave de la lección:

1. Psicología Industrial Organizacional

2. Métodos de investigación

3. Ética

Lista de materiales suplementarios para el taller:

1. Revistas de investigación de la SIOP

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 35

Updated 04/30/2011

Componentes de SIOP (Sheltered-Instruction Observation Protocol): Coloque una

marca de cotejo (√) en la (__) en todas las estrategias por componente que se usarán en el

taller.

Actividades integradas de contenido y lenguaje para lograr los objetivos del taller

(Contenido y Lenguaje):

1. El facilitador y los estudiantes se presentarán frente a la clase a través de una actividad

de rompe hielo. Esta actividad será elegida por el facilitador.

B. Andamiaje

___ Modelaje

_x__ Práctica Dirigida

___ Práctica Independiente

___ Instrucción Comprensible

C. Opciones para Agrupamiento

___ Grupo Completo

_x__ Grupos Pequeños

___ Pares

_x__ Trabajo Independiente

D. Integración del Proceso

_ x__ Escuchar

__x_ Hablar

__x_ Leer

__x_ Escribir

E. Aplicación

_x__ Actividades Dinámicas de Aplicación

__x_ Significativas y Relevantes

___ Rigurosas

_x__ Alineadas a los Objetivos

_x__ Promueven Participación

A. Preparación

_x__ Adaptación de Contenido

_x__ Enlaces al Conocimiento Previo

_x__ Enlaces al Aprendizaje Previo

___ Estrategias Incorporadas

Estrategias de CALLA (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach)

_x__ Cognoscitivo

___ Meta-cognoscitivo

___ Socio/Afectivo

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 36

Updated 04/30/2011

2. El facilitador discutirá el contenido del modulo enfatizando los objetivos, evaluación y

expectativas de tanto el facilitador como de los estudiantes.

3. El facilitador hará una presentación oral y visual para introducir y explicar lo que es

psicología industrial organizacional, su historia, teorías, y sus paradigmas actuales.

4. El facilitador pedirá a cada estudiante que mencione y explique al menos 2 conceptos

de su lista de conceptos desarrollada como parte de sus asignaciones previas al Taller

Uno.

5. Basado en la actividad anterior, el facilitador recogerá los listados y procederá a

proveer la definición, explicación literal, y la aplicación de cada uno de los conceptos.

6. El facilitador moderará un debate. Cada grupo será asignado un tema y tendrá tiempo

asignado para presentar y discutir su concepto. La presentación debe incluir definición,

ventajas, desventajas, procedimientos, legalidad y aspectos éticos.

a. estudio de casos

b. encuesta y cuestionario

c. observación

d. investigación experimental

7. El facilitador generará una discusión para resumir la actividad anterior. Se discutirá la

importancia de cada una de estas técnicas en el campo de la psicología industrial

organizacional.

8. El facilitador presentará el siguiente video: ¿Cuáles son las herramientas usadas en

Psicología Organizacional?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhEGdIeA9fs&feature=player_embedded#

9. El facilitador discutirá el video anterior y explicará el rol del psicólogo en el área

laboral.

10. El facilitador asignará el tema y los grupos para realizar el proyecto escrito y oral que

será presentado durante el Taller 5.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 37

Updated 04/30/2011

Evaluación:

1. Individual: Ejercicio de Análisis Crítico #1 (tema: el uso del psicólogo industrial

organizacional en las organizaciones): Un enfermero supervisor en un casa de

cuidados a pacientes explica que la mayoría de los pacientes que se atienden en el

centro son de raza blanca, y que la mayoría de su fuerza laboral es africo-americana.

El personal es sujeto a constante trato y comentarios racistas por parte de los

pacientes. La situación ha creado un ambiente de trabajo bastante difícil. La

administración nunca ha trabajado el asunto de forma suficiente. El administrador de

los enfermeros quiere lidiar con la situación y ha decidido mantener una discusión

abierta con el personal para proveer apoyo, tratar de buscar soluciones y mejorar el

ambiente de trabajo en general. Si Ud. fuera un profesional en el campo de la

psicología industrial organizacional, ¿qué le sugeriríaUd al administrador que hiciera?

¿por qué?

2. Grupal: Los estudiantes se reunirán en grupo para discutir su posición de acuerdo al

escenario anterior.

3. Escrito:

a. Los estudiantes completarán la auto evaluación.

b. Cada estudiante desarrollará, describirá y explicará una situación similar en la

cual el sicólogo industrial organizacional se puede desarrollar dentro del área

laboral.

4. Oral/Auditivo: Un miembro de cada grupo presentará a la clase el consenso grupal

acordado como la mejor solución a la situación descrita anteriormente.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 38

Updated 04/30/2011

Cierre del taller:

1. Individual: Cada estudiante presentará sus conclusiones respecto a lo presentado en

el taller.

2. Grupal: Los estudiantes se reunirán en grupo para generar, contestar dudas y

preguntas si es que hubiera alguna.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 39

Updated 04/30/2011

WORKSHOPS TWO

Specific Content Objectives:

1. Analyze the different methods and techniques used in organizational development.

2. Describe the organizational structure.

3. Mention the components of the social systems.

4. Examine how and why change is present in organizations.

5. Discuss the principles and types of teamwork.

Specific Language Objectives:

1. Listening: Recognize the three major theories of organizational development after

being presented and discussed in class by the facilitator

2. Speaking: Present to the class the different factors that generate changes in the

organization.

3. Reading: Evaluate the efficacy of an organizational development program as

presented in the literature.

4. Writing: Discuss in an essay the changes faced in organizations.

Electronic Links (URLs):

Virtual Library

http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

Social Cognitive Theory

http://www.slideshare.net/infoedu2006/aprendizaje-cognoscitivo-social

Learning vs. performance

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 40

Updated 04/30/2011

http://formacion-corporativa.blogspot.com/2007/12/aprendizaje-vs-desempeo.html

Organizational development

http://www.elprisma.com/apuntes/administracion_de_empresas/capacitacionrecursoshum

anos/

http://estudiantespsicologiaorganizacional.blogspot.com/2007/07/adiestramiento-de-

personal.html

Classical Theory

http://rie.cl/?a=11294

Organizational Structure

http://www.contactopyme.gob.mx/guiasempresariales/guias.asp?s=10&g=1&sg=1

Resistance to change

http://www.articuloz.com/administracion-articulos/resistencia-al-cambio-organizacional-

1175471.html

Teamwork

http://www.degerencia.com/tema/trabajo_en_equipo

http://www.aiteco.com/quequip.htm

Quality enhancement strategy

http://www.navactiva.com/es/descargas/pdf/amngm/circulos_calidad.pdf

Assignments before the Workshop:

1. Define and explain the following concepts:

a. Learning

b. Performance

c. Organizational Analysis

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 41

Updated 04/30/2011

d. Task analysis

e. Person analysis

f. Organizational structure

g. Social systems

h. Organizational changes

2. Write an essay detailing and explaining the changes in the organization. The essay

should also include the factors contributing to the changes in organizations, the

impact change has on the staff, and how the administration deals with change, how to

deal with resistance to change and what are the consequences of changes in the

organization.

3. Research and come prepare to class to discuss the different types of groups in

organizations.

4. Follow the link to watch the video Teamwork. Come to class prepare to discuss your

ideas about teamwork in organizations.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1RaZzXuZis&feature=related

Key Core Vocabulary:

1. Organizational development

2. Changes in organizations

3. Organizational structure

List of Supplementary Materials for the Workshop:

1. SIOP journals

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 42

Updated 04/30/2011

SIOP Components - Place a checkmark (√) on the (___) for ALL strategies that will be

used in the workshop.

Integrated Activities:

Integrated Activities of Content and Language to achieve Content and Language

Objectives:

1. The facilitator will review and answer question from workshop #2.

2. The facilitator will conduct a presentation to discuss organizational development.

3. The facilitator will conduct a discussion to differentiate learning and performance.

4. The students will discuss their definitions from assignment #1 and will share with

their classmates their experiences if any in conducting task analysis.

B. Scaffolding

___ Modeling

__ Guided Practice

__ Independent Practice

___ Comprehensible Input

C. Grouping Options

___ Whole Class

___ Small Groups

___ Partners

___ Independent Work

D. Integration of Processes

___ Listening

___ Speaking

___ Reading

___ Writing

E. Application

___ Hands-on

___ Meaningful/Relevant

___ Rigorous

___ Link to Objectives

___ Promote Engagement

A. Preparation

___ Adaptation of Content

___ Links to Background Knowledge

___ Links to Past Learning

___ Strategies Incorporated

CALLA Strategies (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach)

___ Cognitive

___ Meta-cognitive

___ Social/Affective

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 43

Updated 04/30/2011

5. The students will divide in groups to discuss changes in the organization. Each group

will choose one change that could affect the organization (example: change in

computer systems, new government law, layoffs, etc). They will present to their

classmates the selected change and the possible effects in the organization, and how

administration should deal with the change.

6. The facilitator will conduct a presentation to discuss the social systems and their

components.

7. The facilitator will conduct a presentation to discuss the different types of teams in

organizations.

8. The class will be divided in 5 groups. Each group will discuss one of the principles of

teamwork and the importance to the efficacy of the team. Each group will have no

more than 10 minutes to present their findings.

i. Group 1 - Feedback

ii. Group 2 - support

iii. Group 3 - interaction

iv. Group 4 - interdependence

v. Group 5 - leadership

9. The facilitator will open a discussion of the video Teamwork.

Assessment: (DIFFERENTIATED BY SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY

LEVELS)

1. Individual: Critical analysis exercise #2 (Topic: Training): An employee in

Company x appears to be struggling with her responsibilities. The company’s

software system was upgraded several years ago, and the employee still does not

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 44

Updated 04/30/2011

understand how the software works. Many phone calls and e-mails from customers

and coworkers have been received regarding concerns with the employee. The

supervisor does not know how to proceed as far as to determine if this is a training

issue; and if so, how to deal with the situation? What would you as industrial

organizational professional suggest the supervisor should do?

2. Group: Students will meet in groups to discuss the above situation.

3. Written:

a. Self Evaluation will be completed.

b. Students will develop and discuss a similar situation showing the different

aspects of organizational development.

4. Oral: groups will present to class the consensus agreed upon as the best solution for

the situation presented and discussed above.

Lesson Wrap-Up:

1. Individual: Each student will discuss his/her conclusions about the topics discussed

in class.

2. Group: Students will meet in groups to identify and answer questions and concerns

raised in class about the topics discussed.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 45

Updated 04/30/2011

TALLER TRES

Objetivos específicos de contenido:

Al final del Taller Tres el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Entender la definición y uso del análisis de puesto.

2. Comprender el proceso legal que involucra la administración de personal.

3. Conocer sobre el desarrollo de predictores.

4. Discutir la historia de la medición psicológica.

5. Conocer cómo aplicar un sistema de evaluación de desempeño.

6. Conocer sobre la evaluación y sus implicaciones éticas y legales.

7. Identificar las fuentes de información para la evaluación de desempeño.

Objetivos específicos de lenguaje:

Al final del Taller Tres el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Escuchar: Entender por medio de una presentación oral lo que es un análisis de

puesto y lo que conlleva.

2. Hablar: Ensayar de forma oral como ofrecer la retroalimentación de la evaluación de

desempeño a los empleados.

3. Leer: Examinar cada uno de los componentes de una descripción de puesto.

4. Escribir: Completar en forma escrita un análisis de puesto.

Enlaces electrónicos:

Biblioteca Virtual

http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

Análisis de puesto

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 46

Updated 04/30/2011

http://www.rrhh-web.com/analisisdepuesto.html

http://www.conductitlan.net/psicologia_organizacional/analisis_de_puesto.pdf

Medición psicológica

http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/138.pdf

http://www.unisimonbolivar.edu.co/rdigital/psicogente/index.php/psicogente/article/view

File/78/90

Historia de la medición psicológica

http://www.slideshare.net/pcanazco/primeros-instrumentos-de-medicin-psicolgica-

2918098

Tipos de entrevista

http://www.entrevistadetrabajo.com/Seccion2.asp?Id_Sec=142&Id=0

Ventajas y desventajas entrevista estructurada y no estructurada (tabla)

http://www.scribd.com/doc/15674372/Entrevista-Estructurada-y-No-Estructurada

Entrevista estructurada

http://www.asvconsulting.net/doc/es-la-entrevista-conductual-estructurada.pdf

Reclutamiento y selección de personal

http://www.infomipyme.com/Docs/GT/empresarios/rrhh/page3.html

Evaluación de desempeño

http://opcion.com.uy/recursos/pdf/publicaciones/opcion_evaluacion_de_desempeno.pdf

Evaluación de 360 grados

http://www.psicologiacientifica.com/bv/psicologia-125-4-evaluacion-de-desempeno-en-

360-todos-opinamos-todos-nos-beneficiamos.html

Prevención demandas laborales

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 47

Updated 04/30/2011

http://www.empresaldia.com/boletin/Prev_demandas_lab.htm

Asignaciones antes del taller:

El estudiante deberá completar las siguientes asignaciones previo al inicio del Taller

Tres:

1. Definir y explicar ensus propias palabras los siguientes conceptos

a. Análisis de puesto

b. Descripción de puesto

c. Evaluación de puesto

d. Equidad de puesto

e. Grupos protegidos

f. Impacto adverso

g. Acción afirmativa

2. Trabajo escrito: Reflexione ybusque información acerca de la historia de la medición

psicológica y cómo ésta se ha desarrollado. Escriba un ensayo sobre el tema:

Desarrollo de la medición psicológica. Detalles a incluir: ¿Qué es la medición

psicológica, ¿Cómo se ha desarrollado la medición psicológica?, ¿cuál ha sido el

desarrollo de la medición psicológica hasta el día de hoy?, ¿cuál es el futuro de la

medición psicológica, aspectos legales y éticos de la medición psicológica?

Desarrolle y presente cual es su opinión sobre el uso de la medición psicológica en el

área laboral.

3. Busque información sobre los siguientes temas y venga a la clase preparado/a a

participar en una presentación oral sobre:

a. Tipos de pruebas

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 48

Updated 04/30/2011

b. Estándares éticos en las pruebas

c. Pruebas de aptitud mecánica

d. El valor de las pruebas

4. Realice una revisión de literatura y venga a clase preparado para discutir con la clase

acerca de los métodos de selección de personal y sus consideraciones éticas y legales.

5. Lea sobre la evaluación de desempeño, en especial sobre la evaluación de desempeño

360 grado, sus usos e implicaciones éticas y legales.

Vocabulario clave de la lección:

1. Análisis de puesto

2. Evaluación de desempeño

3. Entrevista

Lista de materiales suplementarios para el taller:

1. Revistas de investigación de la SIOP

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 49

Updated 04/30/2011

Componentes de SIOP (Sheltered-Instruction Observation Protocol): Coloque una

marca de cotejo (√) en la (__) en todas las estrategias por componente que se usarán en el

taller.

Actividades integradas de contenido y lenguaje para lograr los objetivos del taller

(Contenido y Lenguaje):

1. .

B. Andamiaje

___ Modelaje

_x__ Práctica Dirigida

___ Práctica Independiente

___ Instrucción Comprensible

C. Opciones para Agrupamiento

___ Grupo Completo

_x__ Grupos Pequeños

___ Pares

_x__ Trabajo Independiente

D. Integración del Proceso

_ x__ Escuchar

__x_ Hablar

__x_ Leer

__x_ Escribir

E. Aplicación

_x__ Actividades Dinámicas de Aplicación

__x_ Significativas y Relevantes

___ Rigurosas

_x__ Alineadas a los Objetivos

_x__ Promueven Participación

A. Preparación

_x__ Adaptación de Contenido

_x__ Enlaces al Conocimiento Previo

_x__ Enlaces al Aprendizaje Previo

___ Estrategias Incorporadas

Estrategias de CALLA (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach)

_x__ Cognoscitivo

___ Meta-cognoscitivo

___ Socio/Afectivo

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 50

Updated 04/30/2011

2. El facilitador presentará el tema del análisis y descripción de puesto utilizando la

estrategia visual preferida.

3. La clase se dividirá en grupos de cuatro estudiantes y desarrollarán un análisis de

puesto, y luego redactarán la descripción del puesto para ser presentada en clase.

4. El facilitador presentará el tema de la medición psicológica mediante un recurso

audiovisual y explicará su desarrollo y aplicación.

5. Presentación oral: la clase se dividirá en grupos de cuatro estudiantes y cada grupo

discutirá el tema asignado. (cada grupo tendrá 10 minutos para presentar su tema):

i. Grupo 1: Tipos de pruebas

ii. Grupo 2: Estándares éticos en las pruebas

iii. Grupo 3: Pruebas de aptitud mecánica

iv. Grupo 4: el valor de la pruebas

6. El facilitador conducirá una discusión basada en la presentación del tema de las

evaluaciones de desempeño utilizando como ejemplo evaluaciones reales utilizadas

en corporaciones.

7. Los estudiantes se reunirán en grupos para evaluar y criticar basados en su previa

revisión de literatura las evaluaciones presentadas en la actividad anterior.

8. Mediante el uso de discusión abierta se describirá en detalle el proceso de evaluación

de desempeño, la evaluación de desempeño 360 grados, y las medidas disciplinarias,

incluyendo el despido por baja productividad.

9. Role Play: en grupos de dos los estudiantes prepararán un ejemplo de una evaluación

de desempeño y luego dramatizarán el cómo presentar los resultados a un empleado.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 51

Updated 04/30/2011

Evaluación:

1. Individual: Ejercicio de análisis crítico #3 (Tema: evaluaciones de desempeño): La

compañía X tiene una política de evaluaciones de desempeño llamada regla 70/20/10.

Consiste en que la administración le exige a sus supervisores el evaluar el 70% de

todos los asociados como “cumple la expectativas”, el 20% como “excede las

expectativas” y un 10 % como “necesita mejorar”. La mayoría de los supervisores no

se sienten a gusto con esta regla y la consideran injusta y desmoralizante. Los

supervisores se sienten atemorizados de expresar su preocupación con esta regla a la

alta gerencia y no saben qué hacer.

Siendo Ud. un profesional de la psicología industrial organizacional, ¿cómo

enfrentaría y resolvería esta situación?

2. Grupal: Los estudiantes se reunirán en grupo para exponer y discutir su concenso de

acuerdo al escenario anterior.

3. Escrito:

c. El estudiante completará su auto evaluación.

d. Cada estudiante desarrollará, describirá y explicará una situación similar en la

cual el desempeño laboral sea aplicado.

4. Oral/Auditivo: Un miembro representando su grupo presentara a la clase el consenso

acordado y discutido en el grupo como mejor solución a la situación descrita

anteriormente.

Cierre del taller:

1. Individual: Cada estudiante presentará sus conclusiones respecto a lo presentado en

el taller.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 52

Updated 04/30/2011

2. Grupal: Los estudiantes se reunirán en grupo para generar y contestar dudas y

preguntas si es que hubiera alguna.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 53

Updated 04/30/2011

WORKSHOP FOUR

Specific Content Objectives:

3. Explain the theories attempting to explain motivation n the workplace..

4. Apply the different motivational strategies.

5. Define and explain the concept work satisfaction.

6. Discuss the theories of leadership.

7. Understand the aspects of diversity when related to leadership.

Specific Language Objectives:

1. Listening: Understand the concept of employee satisfaction after the oral discussion in

the classroom.

2. Speaking: Present to the class the different characteristics of an effective an efficient

leader.

3. Reading: Differentiate while conducting revision of literature how motivation could

vary depending on gender and age.

4. Writing: Discuss in an essay the characteristics needed to be a leader in the

organization.

Electronic Links (URLs):

Biblioteca Virtual

http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

Motivation and work satisfaction

http://www.apsique.com/wiki/LaboMotysatis

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 54

Updated 04/30/2011

http://www.nodo50.org/cubasigloXXI/economia/cruz1_280203.pdf

Citizenship behavior

http://web.usal.es/~ggdacal/WebPersonalCLCivica.htm

http://www.uv.es/seoane/boletin/previos/N90-5.pdf

Work Motivation

http://www.microsoft.com/business/smb/es-es/rrhh/motivacion_laboral.mspx

Leadership

http://www.elergonomista.com/lid.html

Leadership styles

http://www.slideshare.net/cpuche/correlacin-entre-uso-del-elearning-tipos-de-cultura-

organizacional-y-estilos-de-liderazgo-de-cambio

http://www.leonismoargentino.com.ar/INST180.htm

E-leadership

http://www.g-casa.com/download/Budvytyte_E_leadership2.pdf

http://www.slideshare.net/lizmargarita/eleadership-4400562

Feminine leadership

http://www.turwl.com/now-cmujer/online/amparoramos.pdf

Assignments before the Workshop:

1. Define and explain the following concepts:

a. Motivation

b. Incentives

c. Work Satisfaction

d. Work commitment

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 55

Updated 04/30/2011

e. Leadership

f. Organizational justice

g. Citizenship behavior

2. Write an essay detailing and explaining work satisfaction. The essay should also

include the factors contributing to satisfaction in organizations.

3. Research and come prepare to class to discuss the different theories attempting to

explain motivation.

4. The student will use their creativity to design a visual project (no words just images)

exemplifying what a leader should be. This project will be presented in class and the

student will discuss why the images explain or describe what leadership is.

Key Core Vocabulary:

1. leadership

2. motivation

3. satisfaction

List of Supplementary Materials for the Workshop:

1. SIOP journals

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 56

Updated 04/30/2011

SIOP Components - Place a checkmark (√) on the (___) for ALL strategies that will be

used in the workshop.

Integrated Activities: These activities must be aligned to the language and content

objectives of the workshop. ACTIVITIES FOR ALL EDUCATION COURSES MUST

BE ALIGNED TO THE NEXT GENERATION SUNSHINE STATE STANDARDS,

FLORIDA EDUCATOR ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES, READING STANDARDS,

AND APPLICABLE ESOL STANDARDS. In addition, activities must reflect the use

of the different resources available from the language lab or e-lab.

B. Scaffolding

___ Modeling

__ Guided Practice

__ Independent Practice

___ Comprehensible Input

C. Grouping Options

___ Whole Class

___ Small Groups

___ Partners

___ Independent Work

D. Integration of Processes

___ Listening

___ Speaking

___ Reading

___ Writing

E. Application

___ Hands-on

___ Meaningful/Relevant

___ Rigorous

___ Link to Objectives

___ Promote Engagement

A. Preparation

___ Adaptation of Content

___ Links to Background Knowledge

___ Links to Past Learning

___ Strategies Incorporated

CALLA Strategies (Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach)

___ Cognitive

___ Meta-cognitive

___ Social/Affective

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 57

Updated 04/30/2011

Integrated Activities of Content and Language to achieve Content and Language

Objectives:

1. The facilitator will review and answer questions from workshop #3.

2. The facilitator will conduct a presentation to discuss satisfaction and work

commitment.

3. The facilitator will open and guide a discussion to generate situations in which

organizational citizenship behavior is displayed.

4. The students will discuss their definitions from assignment #1 and will share with

their classmates their experiences if any in developing the poster.

5. The students will divide in groups to discuss one of the theories of motivation in the

organization.

6. The students will present to their classmates the selected theory.

7. The students will present and discuss their poster.

Assessment: (DIFFERENTIATED BY SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY

LEVELS)

1. Individual: Critical analysis exercise #2 (Topic: leadership): An employee in

Company x has been assigned a new project to implement work rotations. The

problem is that the group of people assigned to work with him understands that this is

a non-sense practice. All of them are focused on their job and are not willing to rotate

and cross train. How should the employee assigned as leader do to deal with the

situation? What would you as industrial organizational professional suggest the

employee should do to convince the group that the rotations and cross training is a

good idea?

2. Group: Students will meet in groups to discuss the above situation.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 58

Updated 04/30/2011

3. Written:

a. Self-Evaluation will be completed.

b. Students will develop and discuss a similar situation showing the different

aspects of leadership.

4. Oral: groups will present to class the consensus agreed upon as the best solution for

the situation presented and discussed above.

Lesson Wrap-Up:

1. Individual: Each student will discuss his/her conclusions about the topics discussed

in class.

2. Group: Students will meet in groups to identify and answer questions and concerns

raised in class about the topics discussed.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 59

Updated 04/30/2011

Taller Cinco/Workshop Five

(TWO HOURS IN SPANISH AND TWO HOURS IN ENGLISH)

NOTA: Este taller es bilingüe. Tanto, el

Facilitador como los estudiantes, deberán

utilizar el idioma asignado para cada tarea y

actividad. No mezcle los dos idiomas!

UTILICEN SOLAMENTE UN LENGUAJE

A LA VEZ! Las primeras dos horas serán en

español. Las últimas dos horas serán en

inglés.

NOTE: This is a bilingual workshop. Both

the facilitator and the student must use the

language assigned for each homework and

activity. Do not mix both languages! USE

ONE LANGUAGE AT A TIME- KEEP

BOTH LANGUAGES SEPARATE! The

first two hours must be in Spanish. The last

two hours must be in English.

Objetivos específicos de contenido:

Al final del taller el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Discutir los orígenes y el desarrollo del concepto de salud ocupacional.

2. Explicar las influencias ambientales en la salud mental.

3. Saber e identificar el estrés laboral.

4. Determinar las diferentes causas de la violencia en el trabajo.

5. Reconocer los diferentes signos que pudieran identificar un posible agresor en el

trabajo.

6. Analizar el desempleo y sus consecuencias mentales.

Objetivos específicos de lenguaje:

Al final del taller el estudiante será capaz de:

1. Escuchar: entender como el alcohol y las drogas afectan negativamente al empleado

y a su entorno laboral.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 60

Updated 04/30/2011

2. Hablar: presentar las diferentes estrategias que se pueden usar para disminuir la

violencia en el trabajo.

3. Leer: reconocer los efectos psicológicos que conlleva el desempleo.

4. Escribir: demostrar la naturaleza de cómo las enfermedades mentales afectan el

desempeño laboral.

Enlaces electrónicos:

Biblioteca Virtual

http://bibliotecavirtualut.suagm.edu/

Salud ocupacional

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/spanish/occupationalhealth.html

http://polaris.unisabana.edu.co/prevencion/salud_ocupacional/salud_ocupacional.html

Salud Mental

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/spanish/mentalhealth.html

Conflicto entre familia y trabajo

http://www.infocoponline.es/view_article.asp?id=2089

http://www.cinterfor.org.uy/public/spanish/region/ampro/cinterfor/temas/gender/doc/cint

er/pacto/cue_gen/tra_fam.htm

http://www.iae.edu.ar/antiguos/Documents/iae_9_Pag76TrabFam.pdf

Familias con carrera dual

http://books.google.com.pr/books?id=RJpRKNGuBaUC&pg=PA213&lpg=PA213&dq=f

amilias+de+carrera+dual&source=bl&ots=-

GvfzAqfO_&sig=0u8mtNCcEiGgxGm5xXU1UMfY92c&hl=es&ei=-

3OsTM_RFsLYnAf-

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 61

Updated 04/30/2011

o6C1Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAw#v=onep

age&q&f=false

http://www.cinterfor.org.uy/public/spanish/region/ampro/cinterfor/publ/bathhya/pdf/cap4

.pdf

Trabajo por turnos

http://www.cdc.gov/spanish/niosh/docs/97-145sp.html

Drogas y alcohol

http://www.documentacion.edex.es/docs/1113GAYwee.pdf

Desempleo

http://www.aset.org.ar/congresos/7/14008.pdf

Trabajo y explotación infantil

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bsdKKfRp8BY

http://www.unicef.org/spanish/protection/index_childlabour.html

Violencia laboral

http://www.laboramosjuntos.com.ar/shop/detallenot.asp?notid=11

http://mobbingopinion.bpweb.net/artman/publish/article_1679.shtml

http://www.fiso-web.org/imagenes/publicaciones/archivos/2532.pdf

Asignaciones antes del taller:

Asignaciones a discutirse las primeras dos horas de instrucción (2).

1. Define y explica los siguientes conceptos: (Apéndice D)

a. Salud ocupacional

b. Salud mental

c. Estrés laboral

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 62

Updated 04/30/2011

d. Carrera dual

e. Consumo de drogas y alcohol

f. Explotación infantil

g. Violencia laboral

2. Reflexione y busque información sobre cómo el alcoholismo y el consumo de drogas

afectan el área de trabajo. Escriba un ensayo sobre el tema: Efectos del alcohol y las

drogas en el ámbito laboral.

Assignments to be discussed the last two hours of instruction (2).

3. Complete the written project as assigned in workshop #2.

4. Prepare to present findings detailed in the written project.

Vocabulario académico clave (Debe

reflejar los objetivos y conceptos claves

del taller.) Verifique que el estudiante

domine el vocabulario clave en los dos

idiomas.

1. Salud mental

2. Violencia

Academic Core Vocabulary (Must

reflect objectives and important concepts

of the workshop.) Verify that the student

masters the core vocabulary in both

languages.

1.

List of Supplementary Materials for the Workshop:

1. Audiovisuals to present final project

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 63

Updated 04/30/2011

SIOP Components - Place a checkmark (√) on the (___) for ALL strategies that will be

used in the workshop.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

B. Scaffolding

___ Modeling

___ Guided Practice

___ Independent Practice

___ Comprehensible Input

C. Grouping Options

___ Whole Class

___ Small Groups

___ Partners

___ Independent Work

D. Integration of Processes

___ Listening

___ Speaking

___ Reading

___ Writing

E. Application

___ Hands-on

___ Meaningful/Relevant

___ Rigorous

___ Link to Objectives

___ Promote Engagement

A. Preparation

___ Adaptation of Content

___ Links to Background Knowledge

___ Links to Past Learning

___ Strategies Incorporated

CALLA Strategies

(Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach)

___ Cognitive

___ Meta-cognitive

___ Social/Affective

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 64

Updated 04/30/2011

Integrated Activities:

Actividades integradas de contenido y lenguaje para lograr los objetivos del taller:

Actividades en español para las primeras dos horas del taller:

1. Los estudiantes se reunirán en grupos y discutirán ejemplos de cómo se manifiesta la

violencia en el trabajo. Los estudiantes también desarrollaran posibles

recomendaciones para prevenir la misma..

2. Los estudiantes presentarán y discutirán sus ensayos sobre el alcohol y las drogas.

3. El facilitador presentará y discutirá con el tema de salud ocupacional y generara una

discusión donde los estudiantes deben presentar ejemplos especificos del tema.

4. El facilitador desarrollará una discusión grupal para hacer que los estudiantes

identifiquen cuáles son los posibles factores del desarrollo de la salud mental y que

ayudas están disponibles en la comunidad.

Integrated content and language activities aligned to achieve workshop objectives:

Activities in English for the last two hours of the workshop:

1. The students will be divided in by gender. One group are females and the other group

are males. Each group will analize and discuss families with dual careers from their

gender perspective.

2. Students will present their findings from the previous activity.

3. The facilitator will lead an open discussion on violence in the workplace.

4. Students will present their final projects.

Assessment: LAS TWO HOURS OF THE WORKSHOP (DIFFERENTIATED BY

SECOND LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY LEVELS)

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 65

Updated 04/30/2011

1. Individual: the students will complete the self-evaluation focusing not just on this

workshop but in the course.

2. Group: the students will be divided in groups to discuss child exploitation and will

generate possible solutions to the problem.

3. Written: Students will complete the self-evaluation.

4. Oral: the students will present to the class their findings and solutions to the assigned

topic.

Lesson Wrap-Up: LAST TWO HOURS OF THE WORKSHOP (These are activities

to determine if all students achieved the content and language objectives for the

workshop.)

1. Individual: Each student will discuss his/her conclusions about the topics discussed

in class.

2. Group: Students will meet in groups to identify and answer questions and concerns

raised in class about the topics discussed.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 66

Updated 04/30/2011

APPENDIX A

NATIONAL PROFICIENCY LEVELS FOR DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION

Retrieved from: WIDA Consortium http://www.wida.us/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 67

Updated 04/30/2011

“Can Do” Listening Rubric

National Proficiency Levels Criteria

Starting

Identifies objects

Names concrete objects

Points to picture/object of the word heard

Follows simple commands

Repeats words or simple phrases

Understands simple messages – gestures, pointing

Emerging

Draws a picture

Requires continuous repetition

Follows verbal dictations

Checks-off words that were heard

Repeats information heard to determine comprehension

Understands slow speech and multiple repetitions

Developing Understands more details of spoken language

Needs limited or no repetition and slow speech

Understands basic academic vocabulary which is frequently used in class discussions

Understands class discussions with some difficulty

Understands most of what was said

Expanding Needs limited or no repetition at normal speed speech

Understands academic vocabulary used in class discussions

Understands class discussions with little difficulty

Understands nearly everything said

Bridging Needs no repetition at normal speed speech

Understands elaborate academic vocabulary used in class discussions

Understands class discussions with no difficulty

Demonstrates a native-like English speaker’s understanding of what is said

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 68

Updated 04/30/2011

“Can Do” Speaking Rubric

National Proficiency

Levels

Criteria

Starting Names concrete objects

Responds a simple yes or no to questions

Repeats words or simple phrases

Uses one word commands

Mispronounces words making it difficult to be understood

Breaks speech into parts making comprehension difficult

Uses limited or no vocabulary to support message

Emerging Uses a few more words to respond to questions although grammatically incorrect

Uses one-, two-, and multiple-word commands

Uses verb tenses interchangeably

Misuses words in daily speech

Repeats spoken words or phrases to improve understanding due to pronunciation flaws

Uses grammar and word order incorrectly

Uses vocabulary (emerging stage) to support oral messages

Developing Responds using longer phrases/sentences

Initiates and carries out conversations; however, there may be interruptions due to thinking of the

correct words to say

Applies grammar and word order correctly most of the time

Demonstrates correct use of basic academic vocabulary which is frequently used in class

discussions and/or oral assignments.

Speaks with some hesitation

Uses vocabulary to support oral messages

Speaks with less difficulty, but listener must pay close attention to pronunciation.

Expanding Responds using elaborate phrases/sentences

Uses and interprets idiomatic expressions

Converses more fluently in social settings

Uses academic vocabulary frequently in class discussions

Participates in class discussions using academic content with slight hesitation

Misuse of grammar and word order seldom occurs and does not interrupt meaning

Pronounces most words accurately and clearly

Bridging Speaks fluently

Uses elaborate academic vocabulary in all class discussions correctly

Participates in class discussion using academic content without hesitation

Uses appropriate vocabulary to support oral messages at all times

Uses correct grammar and word all the time

Speaks with native-like pronunciation and intonation

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 69

Updated 04/30/2011

“Can Do” Reading Rubric

National Proficiency

Levels

Criteria

Starting Lacks comprehension of a wide array of written material (not developed)

Lacks ability to interpret graphs, charts, tables, and forms in textbooks (not developed)

Struggles with use of pre-reading and reading skills (not developed)

Lacks ability to apply reading strategies in order to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (not

developed)

Struggles with use of strategic reading skills (in order to plan his/her reading assignments, diagnose deficiencies,

resolve deficiencies independently or with the help of others, etc.) (not developed)

Emerging Improving comprehension (slowly emerging) of a wide array of written material (e.g., fictional and non-fictional

texts that bridge personal, professional and academic themes, news articles, short stories, short novels, etc.)

Demonstrates correct interpretation of basic graphs, charts, tables and forms in textbooks

Applies limited pre-reading (e.g., activation of prior knowledge, semantic maps, etc.) and reading skills (e.g.,

skimming, scanning, inferences, paragraph frames, DRA, SQ4R, etc.) (slowly emerging)

Struggles with ability to use limited reading strategies to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (e.g.,

definition, restatement, examples, surrounding words, etc.) is

Strives to understand (even when not successful) the relationship between ideas (e.g., time, logical order,

comparison/contrast, cause/effect), and reading patterns in order to identify literary genres (as listed above)

Applying successful reading skills (as listed above) are still emerging

Developing Comprehends a wide array of written material (as listed above)

Interprets basic graphs, charts, tables and forms

Applies correctly pre-reading and reading skills (as listed above)

Applies correct use of reading strategies to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (as listed above)-

evidence of emerging.

Understands the relationship between ideas (as listed above)-evidence of emerging..

Uses strategic reading skills (as listed above) that are evident.

Expanding Comprehends a wide array of level-appropriate written materials (as listed above) with mature accuracy

Interprets increasingly complex graphs, charts, tables, and forms accurately

Applies pre-reading and reading skills (as listed above) very strongly

Applies strategies to guess meanings of unfamiliar words from context (as listed

above) which is clearly evident

Identifies signal words to understand the relationship between ideas (as listed above), and reading patterns to

identify literary genres (as listed above)- emerging strongly

Understands the relationship between ideas (as listed above)-strongly evident.

Uses strategic reading skills (as listed above) with mature accuracy

Bridging Comprehends various types and lengths of level appropriate written materials (as listed above)-fully developed

Interprets complex graphs, charts, tables, and forms accurately

Applies pre-reading and reading skills (as listed above)-fully developed

Applies reading strategies to determine the meaning of unfamiliar words in a text (as listed above) with accuracy

Understands the relationship between ideas (time, logical order, comparison/contrast, cause/effect)

Demonstrates fully developed strategic reading skills (as listed above)

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 70

Updated 04/30/2011

“Can Do” Writing Rubric

National Proficiency

Levels Criteria

Starting Lacks clear writing and focus.. Details are limited or unclear. There’s no clear distinction to what is important and what is supported.

Lacks engaging and drawing a conclusion. Paper simply starts and ends. Lack of transitions make it difficult to understand the paper.

Writes with limited use of vocabulary or specific words to transmit meaning of the essay. Misuse of parts of speech makes it difficult to understand

the writing.

Rambles- use of incomplete sentences that are too long to understand. Sentences follow a simple structure and or style.

Struggles with spelling, punctuation capitalization and other writing conventions. This makes it very difficult to understand the writing.

Lacks strategic writing skills (e. g., knowledge of the writing process; declarative, procedural and conditional knowledge; and strategies for inquiry, for

drafting [such as investigating genre, considering audience, and responding to purpose], and for product revision) that are clearly not developed.

Emerging Writes sentences that are still unclear there seems to be a guide to a focused topic; however, it may drift at times. There is an attempt in details to

support main idea. Reader can still feel confused.

Attempts to write an introduction and or conclusion. Use of transitions helps, but paper is in need of more details.

Struggles with some vocabulary terms that are used inappropriately. Greater command of the parts of speech is developing,.

but many words are still used incorrectly.

Attempts to create a style of sentence structure here and there; although, for the most part it sticks to one style.

Shows need of improving spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other writing conventions. It is still difficult to read the writing; but there are signs

of improvement.

Demonstrates emerging strategic writing skills.

Developing Writes with an unclear focus. Writing appears to be on one topic, but shifts to another topic at times. Support of main idea is lacking. Reader is left

with unanswered questions.

Attempts to write a proper introduction and conclusion however, both are dull or unclear. Transitions help connect ideas although at times they

distract the flow.

Selects and uses words appropriately; however, they are not higher level and need more vigor.

Formulates well-written sentences; however, style and structure of sentences are repetitious.

Demonstrates control of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other writing conventions. However, the writing could read and sound better by

improving conventions.

Utilizes strategic writing skills properly (now evident).

Expanding Writes with a focus in mind; however, there is room for improvement. Needs more relevant details to support the main idea.

Some readers’ questions can be answered, while others are left with doubt.

Uses a proper introduction and conclusion, however, some improvement is needed. Needs to continue using transitional words are properly in order to

allow the proper flow of ideas.

Selects and uses vocabulary words that are much more livelier and appropriate. Some common wording can be improved.

Writes with a definite style, and sentence structure is “catchy” with few mistakes.

Demonstrates good control of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and other writing conventions. Mistakes are few and nothing distracts from the

writing.

Applies mature strategic writing skills.

Bridging Writing is clear and focused on a narrowed topic. Details are relevant and accurate, and they support the main ideas. Reader’s questions are answered

Writing has a clear introduction that’s hooks the reader and conclusion that leaves a lasting impression. Use of transitions helps the reader to connect

ideas. Reading flows and not dull.

Words used in the writing are specific and accurate. Vivid verbs and modifying words are present. Words used enhance the meaning of the writing.

There is a variety in length and structure of the sentences. The style of sentences varies on how they begin. Sentences create fluency and rhythm.

Excellent control of spelling, punctuation capitalization and other writing conventions.

Strategic writing skills are fully developed.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 71

Updated 04/30/2011

APPENDIX B

THE WRITING PROCESS

6-TRAITS WRITING RUBRIC

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 72

Updated 04/30/2011

Appendix B

Six-Traits of Writing Rubric

Student’s Name:______________________________________

Date:___________________

Facilitator:______________________Course:

____________Assignment:_________________

Instructions: This rubric will be used to evaluate all written work done by the

student in both English and Spanish. Please refer to the trait that you are evaluating

(i.e., Ideas and Content) and write the score in the appropriate box. Select the

criteria per level (6= highest, 1=lowest) that best reflects the student’s writing

ability.

Refer to all the Appendix (D) sheets that describe, in detail, all the writing traits that

you are evaluating in order to complete this rubric properly.

Criteria per Level

(From Highest to Lowest)

Writing Traits 6 5 4 3 2 1

1. Ideas and Content

2. Organization

3. Voice

4. Word Choice

5. Sentence Fluency

6. Conventions

Totals (Add all the totals down, then

across to obtain the Grand Total.)

Grand Total:

Final Score:_________________

Scoring Scale: (36-0)

Outstanding: 33-36 points = A

Very Good: 29-32 points = B

Satisfactory: 24-28 points =C

Fair: 19-23 points =D

Poor: 0-18 points = F

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 73

Updated 04/30/2011

Six Traits for Analytic Writing Rubrics

Trait #1: Idea and Content

Criteria per Level Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from

https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

6

The writing is exceptionally clear, focused and interesting. It holds the reader’s attention throughout. Main ideas stand out and are developed by strong support and rich details suitable to audience and purpose. The writing is characterized by • clarity, focus, and control. • main idea(s) that stand out. • supporting, relevant, carefully selected details; when appropriate, use of resources provides strong, accurate, credible support • a thorough, balanced, in-depth explanation/ exploration of the topic; the writing makes connections and shares insights. • content and selected details that are well suited to audience and purpose.

5

The writing is clear, focused and interesting. It holds the reader’s attention. Main ideas stand out and are developed by supporting details suitable to audience and purpose. The writing is characterized by • clarity, focus, and control. • main idea(s) that stand out. • supporting, relevant, carefully selected details; when appropriate, use of resources provides strong, accurate, credible support. • a thorough, balanced explanation/exploration of the topic; the writing makes connections and shares insights. • content and selected details that are well-suited to audience and purpose.

4

The writing is clear and focused. The reader can easily understand the main ideas. Support is present, although it may be limited or rather general. The writing is characterized by • an easily identifiable purpose. • clear main idea(s) • supporting details that are relevant, but may be overly general or limited in places; when appropriate, resources are used to provide accurate support. • a topic that is explored/explained, although developmental details may occasionally be out of balance with the main idea(s); some connections and insights may be present. • content and selected details that are relevant, but perhaps not consistently well chosen for audience and purpose.

3

The reader can understand the main ideas, although they may be overly broad or simplistic, and the results may not be effective. Supporting detail is often limited, insubstantial, overly general, or occasionally slightly off-topic. The writing is characterized by • an easily identifiable purpose and main idea(s). • predictable or overly-obvious main ideas or plot; conclusions or main points seem to echo observations heard elsewhere. • support that is attempted; but developmental details that are often limited in scope, uneven, somewhat off-topic, predictable, or overly general. • details that may not be well-grounded in credible resources; they may be based on clichés, stereotypes or questionable sources of information. • difficulties when moving from general observations to specifics.

2

Main ideas and purpose are somewhat unclear or development is attempted but minimal. The writing is characterized by • a purpose and main idea(s) that may require extensive inferences by the reader. • minimal development; insufficient details. • irrelevant details that clutter the text. • extensive repetition of detail.

1 The writing lacks a central idea or purpose. The writing is characterized by • ideas that are extremely limited or simply unclear. • attempts at development that are minimal or non-existent; the paper is too short to demonstrate the development of an idea.

Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 74

Updated 04/30/2011

Trait #2: Organization

Criteria per Level

6

The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its development. The order and structure are compelling and move the reader through the text easily. The writing is characterized by • effective, perhaps creative, sequencing; the organizational structure fits the topic, and the writing is easy to follow. • a strong, inviting beginning that draws the reader in and a strong satisfying sense of resolution or closure. • smooth, effective transitions among all elements (sentences, paragraphs, and ideas). • details that fit where placed

5

The organization enhances the central idea(s) and its development. The order and structure are strong and move the reader through the text. The writing is characterized by. • effective sequencing; the organizational structure fits the topic, and the writing is easy to follow. • an inviting beginning that draws the reader in and a satisfying sense of resolution or closure. • smooth, effective transitions among all elements (sentences, paragraphs, and ideas). • details that fit where placed. .

4

Organization is clear and coherent. Order and structure are present, but may seem formulaic. The writing is characterized by • clear sequencing. • an organization that may be predictable. • a recognizable, developed beginning that may not be particularly inviting; a developed conclusion that may lack subtlety. • a body that is easy to follow with details that fit where placed. • transitions that may be stilted or formulaic. • organization which helps the reader, despite some weaknesses.

3

An attempt has been made to organize the writing; however, the overall structure is inconsistent or skeletal. The writing is characterized by • attempts at sequencing, but the order or the relationship among ideas may occasionally be unclear. • a beginning and an ending which, although present, are either undeveloped or too obvious (e.g. “My topic is...”, “These are all the reasons that…”) • transitions that sometimes work. The same few transitional devices (e.g., coordinating conjunctions, numbering, etc.) may be overused. • a structure that is skeletal or too rigid. • placement of details that may not always be effective. • organization which lapses in some places, but helps the reader in others.

2

The writing lacks a clear organizational structure. An occasional organizational device is discernible; however, the writing is either difficult to follow and the reader has to reread substantial portions, or the piece is simply too short to demonstrate organizational skills. The writing is characterized by • some attempts at sequencing, but the order or the relationship among ideas is frequently unclear. • a missing or extremely undeveloped beginning, body, and/or ending. • a lack of transitions, or when present, ineffective or overused. • a lack of an effective organizational structure. • details that seem to be randomly placed, leaving the reader frequently confused.

1

The writing lacks coherence; organization seems haphazard and disjointed. Even after rereading, the reader remains confused. The writing is characterized by • a lack of effective sequencing. • a failure to provide an identifiable beginning, body and/or ending. • a lack of transitions. • pacing that is consistently awkward; the reader feels either mired down in trivia or rushed along too rapidly. • a lack of organization which ultimately obscures or distorts the main point.

Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 75

Updated 04/30/2011

Trait #3: Voice

Criteria per Level

6

The writer has chosen a voice appropriate for the topic, purpose and audience. The writer seems deeply committed to the topic, and there is an exceptional sense of “writing to be read.” The writing is expressive, engaging, or sincere. The writing is characterized by • an effective level of closeness to or distance from the audience (e.g., a narrative should have a strong personal voice, while an expository piece may require extensive use of outside resources and a more academic voice; nevertheless, both should be engaging, lively, or interesting. Technical writing may require greater distance.). • an exceptionally strong sense of audience; the writer seems to be aware of the reader and of how to communicate the message most effectively. The reader may discern the writer behind the words and feel a sense of interaction. • a sense that the topic has come to life; when appropriate, the writing may show originality, liveliness, honesty, conviction, excitement, humor, or suspense.

5

The writer has chosen a voice appropriate for the topic, purpose, and audience. The writer seems committed to the topic, and there is a sense of “writing to be read.” The writing is expressive, engaging or sincere. The writing is characterized by • an appropriate level of closeness to or distance from the audience (e.g., a narrative should have a strong personal voice while an expository piece may require extensive use of outside resources and a more academic voice; nevertheless, both should be engaging, lively or interesting. Technical writing may require greater distance.). • a strong sense of audience; the writer seems to be aware of the reader and of how to communicate the message most effectively. The reader may discern the writer behind the words and feel a sense of interaction. • a sense that the topic has come to life; when appropriate, the writing may show originality, liveliness, honesty, conviction, excitement, humor, or suspense.

4

A voice is present. The writer demonstrates commitment to the topic, and there may be a sense of “writing to be read.” In places, the writing is expressive, engaging, or sincere. The writing is characterized by • a questionable or inconsistent level of closeness to or distance from the audience. • a sense of audience; the writer seems to be aware of the reader but has not consistently employed an appropriate voice. The reader may glimpse the writer behind the words and feel a sense of interaction in places. • liveliness, sincerity, or humor when appropriate; however, at times the writing may be either inappropriately casual or personal, or inappropriately formal and stiff.

3

The writer’s commitment to the topic seems inconsistent. A sense of the writer may emerge at times; however, the voice is either inappropriately personal or inappropriately impersonal. The writing is characterized by • a limited sense of audience; the writer’s awareness of the reader is unclear. • an occasional sense of the writer behind the words; however, the voice may shift or disappear a line or two later and the writing become somewhat mechanical. • a limited ability to shift to a more objective voice when necessary.

2

The writing provides little sense of involvement or commitment. There is no evidence that the writer has chosen a suitable voice. The writing is characterized by • little engagement of the writer; the writing tends to be largely flat, lifeless, stiff, or mechanical. • a voice that is likely to be overly informal and personal. • a lack of audience awareness; there is little sense of "writing to be read." • little or no hint of the writer behind the words. There is rarely a sense of interaction between reader and writer.

1

The writing seems to lack a sense of involvement or commitment. The writing is characterized by • no engagement of the writer; the writing is flat and lifeless. • a lack of audience awareness; there is no sense of “writing to be read.” • no hint of the writer behind the words. There is no sense of interaction between writer and reader; the writing does not involve or engage the reader.

Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 76

Updated 04/30/2011

Trait #4: Word Choice

Criteria per Level

6

Words convey the intended message in an exceptionally interesting, precise, and natural way appropriate to audience and purpose. The writer employs a rich, broad range of words, which have been carefully chosen and thoughtfully placed for impact. The writing is characterized by • accurate, strong, specific words; powerful words energize the writing. • fresh, original expression; slang, if used, seems purposeful and is effective. • vocabulary that is striking and varied, but that is natural and not overdone. • ordinary words used in an unusual way. • words that evoke strong images; figurative language may be used.

5

Words convey the intended message in an interesting, precise, and natural way appropriate to audience and purpose. The writer employs a broad range of words which have been carefully chosen and thoughtfully placed for impact. The writing is characterized by • accurate, specific words; word choices energize the writing. • fresh, vivid expression; slang, if used, seems purposeful and is effective. • vocabulary that may be striking and varied, but that is natural and not overdone. • ordinary words used in an unusual way. • words that evoke clear images; figurative language may be used

4

Words effectively convey the intended message. The writer employs a variety of words that are functional and appropriate to audience and purpose. The writing is characterized by • words that work but do not particularly energize the writing. • expression that is functional; however, slang, if used, does not seem purposeful and is not particularly effective. • attempts at colorful language that may occasionally seem overdone. • occasional overuse of technical language or jargon. • rare experiments with language; however, the writing may have some fine moments and generally avoids clichés.

3

Language is quite ordinary, lacking interest, precision and variety, or may be inappropriate to audience and purpose in places. The writer does not employ a variety of words, producing a sort of “generic” paper filled with familiar words and phrases. The writing is characterized by • words that work, but that rarely capture the reader’s interest. • expression that seems mundane and general; slang, if used, does not seem purposeful and is not effective. • attempts at colorful language that seem overdone or forced. • words that are accurate for the most part, although misused words may occasionally appear, technical language or jargon may be overused or inappropriately used. • reliance on clichés and overused expressions.

2

Language is monotonous and/or misused, detracting from the meaning and impact. The writing is characterized by • words that are colorless, flat or imprecise. • monotonous repetition or overwhelming reliance on worn expressions that repeatedly distract from the message. • images that are fuzzy or absent altogether.

1

The writing shows an extremely limited vocabulary or is so filled with misuses of words that the meaning is obscured. Only the most general kind of message is communicated because of vague or imprecise language. The writing is characterized by • general, vague words that fail to communicate. • an extremely limited range of words. • words that simply do not fit the text; they seem imprecise, inadequate, or just plain wrong.

Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 77

Updated 04/30/2011

Trait #5: Sentence Fluency

Criteria per Level

6

The writing has an effective flow and rhythm. Sentences show a high degree of craftsmanship, with consistently strong and varied structure that makes expressive oral reading easy and enjoyable. The writing is characterized by • a natural, fluent sound; it glides along with one sentence flowing effortlessly into the next. • extensive variation in sentence structure, length, and beginnings that add interest to the text. • sentence structure that enhances meaning by drawing attention to key ideas or reinforcing relationships among ideas. • varied sentence patterns that create an effective combination of power and grace. • strong control over sentence structure; fragments, if used at all, work well. • stylistic control; dialogue, if used, sounds natural.

5

The writing has an easy flow and rhythm. Sentences are carefully crafted, with strong and varied structure that makes expressive oral reading easy and enjoyable. The writing is characterized by • a natural, fluent sound; it glides along with one sentence flowing into the next. • variation in sentence structure, length, and beginnings that add interest to the text. • sentence structure that enhances meaning. • control over sentence structure; fragments, if used at all, work well. • stylistic control; dialogue, if used sounds natural.

4

The writing flows; however, connections between phrases or sentences may be less than fluid. Sentence patterns are somewhat varied, contributing to ease in oral reading. The writing is characterized by • a natural sound; the reader can move easily through the piece, although it may lack a certain rhythm and grace. • some repeated patterns of sentence structure, length, and beginnings that may detract somewhat from overall impact. • strong control over simple sentence structures, but variable control over more complex sentences; fragments, if present, are usually effective. • occasional lapses in stylistic control; dialogue, if used, sounds natural for the most part, but may at times sound stilted or unnatural.

3

The writing tends to be mechanical rather than fluid. Occasional awkward constructions may force the reader to slow down or reread. The writing is characterized by • some passages that invite fluid oral reading; however, others do not. • some variety in sentences structure, length, and beginnings, although the writer falls into repetitive sentence patterns. • good control over simple sentence structures, but little control over more complex sentences; fragments, if present, may not be effective. • sentences which, although functional, lack energy. • lapses in stylistic control; dialogue, if used, may sound stilted or unnatural.

2

The writing tends to be either choppy or rambling. Awkward constructions often force the reader to slow down or reread. The writing is characterized by • significant portions of the text that are difficult to follow or read aloud. • sentence patterns that are monotonous (e.g., subject-verb or subject-verb-object). • a significant number of awkward, choppy, or rambling constructions.

1

The writing is difficult to follow or to read aloud. Sentences tend to be incomplete, rambling, or very awkward. The writing is characterized by • text that does not invite—and may not even permit—smooth oral reading. • confusing word order that is often jarring and irregular. • sentence structure that frequently obscures meaning. • sentences that are disjointed, confusing, or rambling. Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 78

Updated 04/30/2011

Trait #6: Conventions

Criteria per Level

6

The writing demonstrates exceptionally strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Errors are so few and so minor that the reader can easily skim right over them unless specifically searching for them. The writing is characterized by • strong control of conventions; manipulation of conventions may occur for stylistic effect. • strong, effective use of punctuation that guides the reader through the text. • correct spelling, even of more difficult words. • paragraph breaks that reinforce the organizational structure. • correct grammar and usage that contribute to clarity and style. • skill in using a wide range of conventions in a sufficiently long and complex piece. • little or no need for editing.

5

The writing demonstrates strong control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage) and uses them effectively to enhance communication. Errors are so few and so minor that they do not impede readability. The writing is characterized by • strong control of conventions. • effective use of punctuation that guides the reader through the text. • correct spelling, even of more difficult words. • paragraph breaks that reinforce the organizational structure. • correct capitalization; errors, if any, are minor. • correct grammar and usage that contribute to clarity and style. • skill in using a wide range of conventions in a sufficiently long and complex piece. • little need for editing.

4

The writing demonstrates control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage). Minor errors, while perhaps noticeable, do not impede readability. The writing is characterized by • control over conventions used, although a wide range is not demonstrated. • correct end-of-sentence punctuation, internal punctuation may sometimes be incorrect. • spelling that is usually correct, especially on common words. • basically sound paragraph breaks that reinforce the organizational structure. • correct capitalization; errors, if any, are minor. • occasional lapses in correct grammar and usage; problems are not severe enough to distort meaning or confuse the reader. • moderate need for editing.

3

The writing demonstrates limited control of standard writing conventions (e.g., punctuation, spelling, capitalization, paragraph breaks, grammar and usage). Errors begin to impede readability. The writing is characterized by • some control over basic conventions; the text may be too simple to reveal mastery. • end-of-sentence punctuation that is usually correct; however, internal punctuation contains frequent errors. • spelling errors that distract the reader; misspelling of common words occurs. • paragraphs that sometimes run together or begin at ineffective places. • capitalization errors. • errors in grammar and usage that do not block meaning but do distract the reader. • significant need for editing.

2

The writing demonstrates little control of standard writing conventions. Frequent, significant errors impede readability. The writing is characterized by • little control over basic conventions. • many end-of-sentence punctuation errors; internal punctuation contains frequent errors. • spelling errors that frequently distract the reader; misspelling of common words often occurs. • paragraphs that often run together or begin in ineffective places. • capitalization that is inconsistent or often incorrect. • errors in grammar and usage that interfere with readability and meaning. • substantial need for editing.

1

Numerous errors in usage, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation repeatedly distract the reader and make the text difficult to read. In fact, the severity and frequency of errors are so overwhelming that the reader finds it difficult to focus on the message and must reread for meaning. The writing is characterized by • very limited skill in using conventions. • basic punctuation (including end-of-sentence punctuation) that tends to be omitted, haphazard, or incorrect. • frequent spelling errors that significantly impair readability. • paragraph breaks that may be highly irregular or so frequent (every sentence) that they bear no relation to the organization of the text. • capitalization that appears to be random. • a need for extensive editing.

Source: Arizona Department of Education. AIMS Six Trait Analytic Writing Rubric. Retrieved from https://www.ade.state.az.us/standards/6traits/

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 79

Updated 04/30/2011

Appendix C

Language Lab and E-Lab Information

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 80

Updated 04/30/2011

Language Lab and E-Lab Information

The Language Lab is designed to help students strengthen their linguistic skills in

English and Spanish. The lab counts with a wide variety of visual and auditory on-line

exercises that allow students to improve their skills in listening comprehension,

pronunciation, vocabulary building, grammar, reading comprehension, and writing.

The language lab also includes a package of 140 carefully selected “English for Speakers

of Other Languages” (ESOL) Web sites to meet students’ needs. Additionally, the

language lab has other language software to boost language learning such as “Tell Me

More,” “Rosetta Stone” (English and Spanish versions), “Ellis Business,” “Ellis Master

Pronunciation,” “Math Media Algebra,” “Math Media Basic Series,” “Spanish Web

sites,” “Internet-Based Research,” and “Guided Writing Activities.”

Tell Me More is an effective system to learn English and Spanish that allows you to

strengthen your skills and fulfill the required language lab hours for your classes. To

maximize your progress, the system will initially assess your knowledge and create a

learning path specifically tailored to your needs. Improve your pronunciation, grammar

and listening skills from beginner to advanced levels with two different profiles,

everyday language and business oriented language. You just need to have access to

Blackboard, the Internet and an Internet Explorer browser.

Net Tutor is an online tutoring service. Live tutoring is available for numerical and computer

classes (scheduled hours apply). For those classes that do not have live tutoring, students can

post questions and they will be answered within 72 hours.

For your convenience the system has a section with “Frequently Asked Questions” available

24/7. Students can access these services anywhere internet access is available.

This service offers tutoring for the following subjects:

- English (available for all courses)

- Spanish (available for all courses)

- Statistics (student must be enrolled in this course)

- Mathematics (student must be enrolled in this course)

- Accounting (student must be enrolled in this course)

- Computer Information Systems (student must be enrolled in this course)

- Wimba Voice is an electronic tool that promotes the use of voice in the development of

academic subjects. Students will use Wimba Voice for assignments, create voice posts

for discussion boards, prepare voice presentations, and send voice e-mails.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 81

Updated 04/30/2011

The Wimba Voice program has 5 functions:

- Voice Authoring: allows recording and listening to voice content on a webpage.

- Voice Discussion Board: allows posting and listening to voice messages within

discussion boards.

- Voice Presentation: allows presenting web content alongside voice messages.

- Voice E-mail: allows sending voice messages via e-mail.

- Voice Podcaster: allows creating and distributing voice messages to participants.

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 82

Updated 04/30/2011

Apéndice D/Appendix D

DEFINICIÓN DE CONCEPTOS / CONCEPT DEFINITIONS

Nombre del estudiante / Student’s Name ____________________________

Puntaje total / Total score __________________________

Concepto / Concept Definición / Definition Referencia / Reference

PSYC 355 Industrial Organizational Psychology 83

Updated 04/30/2011

Apéndice E/Appendix E

AUTOEVALUACION

Nombre del estudiante / Sudent’s name: ____________________________

Workshop # / Taller #__________

Reflexione y conteste las siguientes preguntas / Think and answer the following

questions:

1. ¿Qué aprendí en este taller? What did I learn in this workshop?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

2. ¿Cómo fue mi participación en este taller? How was my participation in this

workshop?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

3. ¿Me preparé adecuadamente para este taller? Aporté ideas, opiniones y/o

reflexiones? Did I adequately prepare for this workshop? Did I collaborate with

ideas, opinions, thoughts, etc.?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

4. ¿Cómo voy a aplicar este nuevo conocimiento a mi vida profesional? How will I

apply this new knowledge to my professional life?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

5. ¿Qué pude haber hecho mejor en este taller? What could have I done better in this

workshop?

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________