Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

The arXiv eprint archive

CS520 guest lectureSimeon Warner

(simeon@cs.cornell.edu)

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

What is arXiv?

• Eprint - lots of meanings, here: pre-print, post-print, no-print, refereed or un-refereed, openly accessible via internet

• 230,000 papers (35k/year, ~150/day)• Mostly physics, some math and cs• Mostly TeX/LaTeX source• Automated PS/PDF production • 17 mirror sites world-wide, nightly update• Secondary submission site in Lyon,

France

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Full-text downloads/week

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

History

• 1992 - hep-th created (email reflector, messages were saved). ~200 users.

• 1992 - ftp interface. hep-ph… added• 1993 - web interface• 1994 - data on remote sites moved to

main site, they become mirrors • 1995 - automatic PS from TeX• 1996 - PDF generation, mirror network

grows• 2003 - ~70,000 users

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Not often cited as HCI exemplar

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Submission form

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Submission methods

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Submissions to different areas

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Why is cs archive failing?• Why are physics/math working?

Strong pre-print culture in physics Active promotion from inside communities

• CS less TeX based• CS has stronger homepage culture?• CS has Citeseer (aka ResearchIndex)• CS researchers hate arXiv interface?• CS has more conference publication?LESSON: Can’t apply `one size fits

all’

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Different habits in CS (1)

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Different habits in CS (2)

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Current problems at arXiv

• Too much admin time 150 new/day, 30 replacements/day

• Inappropriate submissions Encouraged by arXiv’s popularity Should be “peer reviewable” quality Must be appropriate to subject areas

• Copyright PS/PDF Don’t (can’t?) automatically detect

• Submission size (otherwise) good tools produce bloated

figures

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Discipline-Based Repositories, Institutional Repositories, Open

Access…• Driven by cost, ideology, self-promotion…• arXiv is exemplar archive

Largest, best-known, discipline based Need open archiving

• Current interest in institutional repositories Slice the other way to disciple based Coexist?

• Metadata sharing - OAI Essential infrastructure for more disperse

model than arXiv

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Publishers and Peer-Review

• Peer-reviewed publication necessary for academic rewarding (promotion, tenure, prestige) System slow to change

• Physics publishers accept/live-with arXiv Can even submit to journals via arXiv Not true in chemistry/biology

• Peer-review costs ~$500/paper Where would that come from without

subscriptions?

Simeon Warner - 21 April 2003

Resources

• arXiv: http://arXiv.org/• Front (interface to math arXiv):

http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/• Algebraic Geometry and Topology (arXiv

overlay journal) http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/agt/

• OAI: http://www.openarchives.org/• BOAI: http://www.soros.org/openaccess