SEM02-16 What is ETSI ? ETSI Seminar © ETSI 2010. All rights reserved.
SEM21-02 ETSI Seminar 2010 « Legal Considerations » Erik Jansen, LL.M. ETSI Legal Director...
-
Upload
alex-evans -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
0
Transcript of SEM21-02 ETSI Seminar 2010 « Legal Considerations » Erik Jansen, LL.M. ETSI Legal Director...
SEM21-02
ETSI Seminar 2010
« Legal Considerations »
Erik Jansen, LL.M.ETSI Legal Director
Copyright © ETSI 2010. All rights reserved.ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15-17 June 2010
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 2
ETSI members should be aware that several legal considerations need to be taken into account while participating in the activities of ETSI.
- ETSI as an association and ETSI members are subject to different national and supranational laws.
- The bodies of ETSI and the ETSI members are bound by the ETSI Directives.
Focus in this Seminar:
I. ETSI IPR Policy
II. ETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance
Legal considerations
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 3
I.ETSI IPR Policy
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 4
Where do I find the ETSI IPR Policy ? The ETSI IPR Policy (Annex 6 of the ETSI Rules of Procedure) Rights and obligations of Members, Technical Body Chairmen and the ETSI Secretariat in
respect of IPRs Definitions IPR Information Statement and Licensing Declaration Forms
http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI_IPR-Policy.pdf
The ETSI guide on IPRs Background/ Guidance on the interpretation of the rights and obligations deriving from the
IPR Policy Explanation on the duties of Members, Technical Body Chairmen and the ETSI Secretariat in
respect of IPRs Where to find information on essential IPRs Other ETSI IPR Policy matters
http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI_Guide_on_IPRs.pdf
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 5
Tension
Inherent tense relationship between IPRs and Standards:
Standards are intended for free, collective use
IPRs are destined for private, exclusive use
Tension may lead to conflicts whenever the technical content of a standard falls within the scope of an IPR (for instance of a patent as defined by its claims)
Essential IPR = implementation of a standard is requiring the use of protected technology
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 6
CHALLENGE
Solve the tension between IPRs and standards by striking the proper balance between all the different interests involved
Interests involved:
IPR owner: wishes to exploit its IPR commercially
third parties: wish to make and sell standard compliant products under reasonable conditions
public use/end-users: seek the widest possible choice among affordable and interoperable products
SDO: avoid wasting effort on the elaboration of a Deliverable which could subsequently be blocked by an essential IPR
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 7
MAIN CHARACTERISTICS
No technical reservation for the inclusion of IPRs in standards
Early identification and disclosure of essential IPRs
Ensuring the future applicability of the standards in full respect of the rights of the essential IPR owner by requesting irrevocable FRAND licensing undertaking (FRAND = fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory)
No involvement of ETSI in any legal and/or commercial discussion on IPR matters (i.e. terms and conditions of the licenses to be determined by the parties of the agreement only)
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 8
DISCLOSURE OF ESSENTIAL IPRs
Members Duty to disclose in a timely fashion
No requirement to conduct IPR searches
ETSI Publication of disclosed “essential” IPR in the ETSI IPR Database
Users/Implementers of Standards can access information on essential IPRs at http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp
No checking of essentiality of the disclosed IPR
Call for IPR by chairmen of technical bodies
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 9
FRAND-Undertaking
FRAND = Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory
ETSI requesting essential IPR owner to give irrevocable undertaking to grant irrevocable licences under FRAND terms and conditions
IPR owner may give or refuse FRAND licensing undertaking
ETSI has got a clear defined procedure in case of non-availability of licenses, e.g. Article 8 of the ETSI IPR Policy
Ts&Cs of the licenses to be determined by the parties of the agreement and outside ETSI
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 10
Overview
Simple participation in the work of ETSI
Own IPR which might be essential if proposal adopted
Any knowledge of other member/ non-member IPR which
might be essential if proposal adopted
Inform ETSI in a timely fashion
Immediate irr. FRAND-undertaking by IPR owner / request by ETSI to give irr.
FRAND-undertaking.
Yes No
Initiate procedure of non-availability (Clause 8 IPR Policy)
Information reflected in IPR Databasehttp://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp
Submitting an own technical proposal to ETSI
Own IPR which might beessential if proposal adopted
Draw ETSI’s attention on a bona fide basis
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 11
EX ANTE DISCLOSURE OF LICENSING TERMS
= mechanism about submitting anticipated licensing terms for a given standard draft before the contribution becomes part of a standard
How are ex ante disclosures working in ETSI: Ex ante disclosure is fully voluntary; i.e.
• no obligation to disclose licensing terms of essential IPRs
• lack of disclosure is not creating any implications
• Disclosure of licensing terms is left to the usual free market mechanisms
Appropriate safeguards
• New ETSI Antitrust Guidelines
• ETSI is not involved to a large extent in the disclosure of licensing terms
• No discussion/negotiation of specific licensing terms within ETSI
• ETSI is not responsible for determining whether the licensing terms disclosed ex ante are FRAND
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia-Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 12
CONCLUSIONS
ETSI IPR Policy is fairly balancing all the interests involved
ETSI IPR Policy is one of the key elements for the success of ETSI’s globally-applicable standards allowing Members to fully reserve their IPRs was beneficial to
the drafting of excellent and high-quality standards incentive for high technology companies to participate in the
standardization process
ETSI will continue to lead the debate on IPRs and Standards
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 13
II. ETSI Guidelines for
Antitrust Compliance
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 14
Guidelines on Antitrust
What is competition law?
It is the law ensuring that: barriers to trade are not errected effective competition in a market is preserved efficiency, innovation, [lower] free regulation of prices are
encouraged
What are the possible implications for ETSI and its Members?
Anti-competitive behaviour will be considered unenforceable and the competition authorities can impose significant fines with regards to such behaviour. In addittion, national courts can impose damages against the infringer of competition laws.
World Class Standards
ETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010 15
Guidelines on Antitrust
How to avoid anti-competitive behaviour in ETSI?
Read the ETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance and comply with them.
http://www.etsi.org/WebSite/document/Legal/ETSI_Guidelines_for_Antitrust_Compliance.pdf
In case of doubt, the assistance of legal counsel experienced in competition law matters shall be sought before proceeding.
SEM21-02
Thank you for your attention
Erik Jansen, LL.M.
ETSI Legal Director
Copyright © ETSI 2010. All rights reservedETSI Seminar Sophia Antipolis, 15–17 June 2010