SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT · * Bunker and Sludge took place after Cargo Operations...
Transcript of SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT · * Bunker and Sludge took place after Cargo Operations...
SEA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT VALIDATION PROJECT
MIDTERM CONFERENCE
Sept 12 Session 2
• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary
Sept 12 Session 2
• Management words
• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary
Sept 12 Session 2
• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future
• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary
Sept 12 Session 2
• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety
• STM for Efficiency & Environment• Day 1 summary
ENHANCED EFFICIENCY AND REDUCED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
EMPOWERED BY PORT COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (PORTCDM)
Mikael LindRISE Viktoria
PortCDM activities – At a glance
Example of integrated service- RTA from PortCDM to ECDIS
SHIPS AND PORTS NEED TO BE CONNECTED!
Connected ships Connected ports(destination)
Port call synch-
ronization
Voyage optimization Port call optimization
Enabling connectivity to hinterland for
sustainable transport systems
Connected ports(origin)
Port call optimization
Port call synch-
ronization
Enabling connectivity to hinterland for
sustainable transport systems
Port-to-port collaboration (optimization and synchronization)
Business incentives for PortCDMSavings for a large shipping line
(40 000 port calls per year) is between 65 MUSD and 130 MUSD for just-in-time
arrival
Assumption: The largest container vessel consumes 240 tons of fuel at full speed (23
knots) and 40 tons of fuel at 10 knots.
A reduction of 17 % of TTT can take away one vessel (if not fully loaded) in a route of 5 legs, 5 ships, using 4
ports
STRONG INCENTIVES FOR ENHANCED INTERACTION BETWEEN SHIPS AND
PORTS
Very many times ships do not leave in time giving rise to additional port call costs, chasing of time window to next
port, and delay for arriving vessels
OBJECTIVES OF PortCDM
Ports of destination
Port operator
Port operator
Port operator
Just-in-time operations
Optimal resource utilization
Green Steaming
Fast turn-around
Minimal waiting times
High degree of predictability
Ports of origin
Port operator
Port operator
Port operator
High degree of predictability
Precision in time of departure
Minimal chasing
Optimal resource utilization
No unexpected
waiting times
STM supports dynamic acting• Dynamic voyage optimization supported by services of
– Port call synchronization– Weather routing– Area management– Traffic Synchronization
• Dynamic port call optimization supported by services of– Port call synchronization– Traffic synchronization– Port flow optimization– Weather forecasting
PortCDM information service systemShipping ERP
TOS
Port Community Systems (PCS)
PMS
VTMIS
NSW
Service provider’s
systemFOC
Ship ECDIS
Hinterland operator’s
systemAISPrevious /
next port
Inter-operable platform for sharingtime stamps
International PortCDM councilThe Internationalition of PortCDM
BIMCOBMVI GermanyBSA Bahamas
CIRMCyprus Shipping Chamber
IALAICS
IHMAIHOIMOIMPA
IMSOIntertanko
Marshall Island RegistryMember state AustraliaMember state Canada
Member state SingaporeMOF Korea
Port of FreemantlePort of Singapore
SMAValencia port foundation
Confirmed / TBC members
… and more to come
• Port call message format (PCMF)
• PortCDM concept definition
• Generic guidelines for the PortCDMconcept
• Port call structure ontology
• Criteria for accreditation of PortCDMapplication and data services
• Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
International governing body for generic PortCDM matters maintaining:
Ensuring STM and PortCDM implementation meetsthe needs of the international maritime community
Analysis of reasons for being delayedfrom berth
* Arrival OK (Not presented in this sheet)
Departure: * Definite Pilotage changed from 00:30 to 02:00 at 23:48 Thislate change resulted in a penalty fee of 2490SEK.
* Cause of delay: Bunker Operations and Sludge Operations were delayed. (SludgeOp requested (00:05) for 00:30 and wasfinished 01:10).
* Bunker and Sludge took place after Cargo Operations Completed.
* DepartureOK (Not presented in this sheet)
Arrival: * Vessel was at anchor waiting for available berth (511).
* No ETA from MSW-SMA after 2017-05-02 10:47 because RAMONA was scheduled for berth 511 after SMERALDO (see sheet 8), and the agent told the pilotage administration to coordinate (to keep the preliminary pilotage order updated in line with SMERALDOsdeparture).
* Pilotage (definite) ordered for 22:30 (SMERALDO 23:00) thenchanged to 23:30 (SMERALDO 00:00) and then changed to 23:59 (SMERALDO 00:30). These changes resulted in a penalty fee of1490SEK for RAMONA.
* SMERALDO was then further delayed (late change) to 02:00 butthe pilot was already on its way to RAMONA and started the pilotageat 23:59 as ordered. Because of the delay pilotage was billed for 3,5 hours instead of 2 hours which is an extra fee of: 7046SEK
* Cause of delay = berth availability . (SMERALDO was delayed, seesheet 8).
* Arrival OK (Not presented in this sheet)
Departure:* Definite Pilotage changed from 10:00 to 13:00 at 09:24 This late change resulted in a penalty fee of 2490SEK.
* Cause of delay: Cargo Operations delayed + ready to sailoperations (paperwork) delayed.
* Interesting is that MSW-SMA got updated 07:06 to ETD 12:00, this did not change the Pilotage order. (Pilotage Definite was at 07:06 ordered for 10:00).
* With a front-end this would have been visible for all the actorsand action could have been taken already at 07:06 when therewas an indication that there could be a delay.
* Arrival OK. (Not presented in this sheet)
Departue:* Pilotage Commenced = 14:35 (35 minutes delayed). Pilotage usually takeapproximately 1 hour for this type of vessel for departure. But because of the delaypilotage was billed for 1,5 hours instead of 1 hour which is an extra fee of: 3049SEK.
* Cause of delay: Cargo Operations delayed.
* No digital information between 10:07 and 14:00 were found. Somewhere in between the delay occurred.
* Arrival OK. No delays (actually the other way around, the vessel arrived earlier than estimated. )
Departure: * Definite Pilotage changed from 16:00 to 17.30 at 13:52. This late change resulted in a penalty fee of1490SEK. (Not a significant amount, but another vessel suffered from this delay, please see the SONGA RUBY sheet)
* Cargo Operations was completed and the delay was due to that the paper work and testing of the cargo was delayed. (Ready-to-sail operations were delayed).
* Interesting is that PortitSEGOT had at the time of the definite pilotage order ETD estimated to 17:00 and not to 16:00. Why? (Could not find an answer to that.) Ideally ETD and Pilotage Confirmed shouldbe the same.
* Departure OK. No delays (interesting is that PortitSEGOT had latest ETD 13:00 but ATD was 14:38, Pilotage was ordered for 14:30). Why?
Arrival:* Vessel was at anchor waiting for available berth (511).
* Pilotage ordered for 15:30. The departing vessel Bonito was scheduledto depart 16:00 but was delayed (see Bonito sheet) to 17:30. Pilotagewas accordingly changed to 17:00 for Songa Ruby which resulted in a penalty fee of 1990SEK.
* Cause of delay = berth availability . (BONITO was delayed, see separatesheet).
* The pilot was idle for 1,5 hours in vain, waiting at pilot station to board at 17:00 instead of 15:30.
* Arrival OK no delays. But interesting is that ETA wasreported 05:00 but ATA berth was ~06:00. (Pilotage wasordered for 05:00 and was not delayed). ETA? What does thatmean in MSW-SMA/PortitSEGOT?
Departure:* ETD 07:00 and Pilotage ordered for 07:00. ATA was 07:37.
* Pilotage usually take approximately 1 hour for this type ofvessel for departure. But because of the delay pilotage wasbilled for 1,5 hours instead of 1 hour which is an extra fee of: 2610SEK.
* Cause of delay: Cargo Operations delayed. When the pilotage arrived to the vessel approximatly 5-10 lifts remained.
Latest ETD = 05:00 from MSW-SMA & 05:30 from PortitSEGOT. Reported ATD 06:25. Concequences of thisdelay:* Pilotage fee based on time, payed for 1 hr extra pilotage time (Extra Pilotage cost approximately 4697 SEK)* Another vessel with 2 pilots and 2 tugboats inbound for that berth. Pilotage time 04:00-07:20 = 1hr extra pilotage and tugboat-time. (Extra Pilotage cost approximately 8701SEK, this excludes the extra hour oftugboat assistance)* Safety - in this example the inbound vessel had to execute a "turn-around manouver" (See picture) closeto Trubaduren Lighthouse (at the same time: TTAM (Trubaduren Traffic Area Management) is an initiative toincrease the safety in those highly trafficked waters.)* Environment - 1 hour of extra emissions in the archipelago of Gothenburg
* At 02:11 PortitSEGOT changed ETD to 05:30 = indication that there was information that suggested that it could be delays? Why did not the Pilotage Request change accordingly? If so information could be sent toinbound vessel to be at Pilot Boarding Station later. (Pilotage Requested 04:00 which is normal when ETD is 05:00 for the departing vessel).
* Cause of delay :When the pilot came onboard the vessel was not ready to sail, approximately 30 "lifts" remained = 1-1,5h delay. Due to lack of information terminal<--->agent/GotApp.==> Cargo Operations Delayed.
Dependencies betweentime stamps
Cost drivers
THINK DIFFERENT
MAKE THINGS HAPPEN
MAKE A DIFFERENCE
Mikael LindRISE Viktoria
For questions do not hesitate to contact:
EFFICIENCY & ENVIRONMENTGAINS FROM BETTER INFORMATION SHARING AND
STANDARDIZED INFORMATION SERVICES
BJÖRN ANDREASSON, SMA
Service provider
Ports
Fleet operations
Ice breaking services
Shore Centre/VTS
SAR
Shoresideservices
MSW
STMRoute catalogue
services
What is itSTM is an integration project
What kind of benefits
• More effective work onboardand ashore better services
• Generalisability new services
• More information, accurate and up do date, available better services
AchievementsThe cogwheel metaphor
How to describe and specify it?
Is the specification enough?
Achieved!
SeaSWIM
Information services
Applicationservices, e.g. route optimization
STM shipsystem e.g. ECDIS
Goals in this project
From goals to validated effects!
Next steps in project
STM next steps
• Maintenance and refinementof arcitecture
• Services that provides costsavings
• Regional pilot implementations
STM FOR EFFICIENCY & ENVIRONMENT
José Andrés Giménez
STM for Efficiency & Environment
Source: The Guardian
STM for Efficiency & Environment
• Maritime transport emits around 1,000 million tonnes of CO2 annually and is responsible for about 2.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions (3rdIMO GHG study).
• Shipping emissions are predicted to increase between 50% and 250% by 2050 – depending on future economic and energy developments.
STM for Efficiency & Environment
STM Goals
STM DRIVER FOR TRANSFORMATION
SHIP – TO – PORT
- Enabling just-in-time operations
- Improving portefficiency
- Reducing turn-around times
SHIP – TO –SHIP/SHORE
- Optimising routenavigation
- Reducing navigationtimes
- Reducing fuel consumption
Efficiency (€)
Emissions (CO2)
STM for Efficiency & Environment
6
13
125
128
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
No. of Vessels per type of service
OTHER SERVICES
CRUISE SERVICES
REGULAR SERVICES
TRAMP
STM for Efficiency & Environment
STM Test Bed Selected Ships
No. Of ships per type of Service (Total 275 ships)
STM for Efficiency & Environment
STM Monitoring Routes
CONTAINERSHIP06California Express service
Frequency: Weekly10 ships operating the service
Deep-sea serviceVALENCIA – CRISTOBAL – MANZANILLO – LONG BEACH – OAKLAND – VANCOUVER – SEATTLE –OAKLAND – LONG BEACH – MANZANILLO – BALBOA – CRISTOBAL - - BARCELONA – GIOIA TAURO –CIVITAVECCHIA – LA SPEZIA – FOS - VALENCIA
STM for Efficiency & Environment
PortCDMTest Beds
VoyageManagement
Test Beds
ValidatedResults
Macro Analysis
13 EU Ports
300 Ships5 Shore Centers
Use cases:Regular ServicesTramp ServicesCruise ServicesBerth-to-berth VESSL© DataBase
+1,000 Maritime Services+200 EU Ports+2,500 Ships
ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION
STM Expected Benefits
Benefits for Shipping Companies (M€)Nautical Miles SavedFuel Consumption SavedOptmised NavigationWaiting Time SavedSafety Increase
Benefits for EU Ports (M€)Just-in-Time OperationsImproved Predictabilityand PlanningResource OptimisationSafety Increase
Benefits for allReduced GHG EmissionsImproved Air QualityImproved Social PerceptionEfficient and SustainableMaritime Transport
PORT OPTIMIZATION, LOGISTICS, CRUISE
TROND ANDERSEN, PORT OF STAVANGER
What is PortCDM - cruise
Goals in PortCDM cruise
• Punctuality
• Predictability
• Berth productivity
Achievements
Better understanding of situations.Time-related informationreaches actors.Better cooperation and understanding of roles.
Next steps in project
• Port-to-port/Ship-to-port collaboration
• All ships, not just cruise• More connectors
Vision
Sept 12 Session 2
• Management words• Panel – STM & the Future• Something fidgety• STM for Efficiency & Environment
• Day 1 summary
Demos
• Italian STM solutions• PortCDM applications• Transas STM ship & shore centre solutions• Carmenta SAR solution for Rescue Centres• Analysis tools