Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007...

67
Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) Fall 2007 Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research February 6, 2008

Transcript of Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007...

Page 1: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Results of

Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)

Fall 2007

Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research February 6, 2008

Page 2: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Fall 2007

Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction

Table of Contents Executive Summary Overview Analysis of SEOI Questions Full-Time/Part-Time Academic Instructors ……………… Tab 1 Full-Time/Part-Time Workforce Instructors ……………... Tab 2 Learning Resources Results………………………………………... Tab 3 Means Reports Academic ………………………………………………………. Tab 4 Workforce ……………………………………………………… Tab 5 Appendices ……………………………………………………………. Tab 6 Instructor and Student Proctor Directions SEOI Survey How to Read the Individual Instructor Report Please assist us by sharing all or parts of this document with colleagues who might find it useful. You may contact Dr. Linda Gibbs, Director (713) 718-8627, or Ray Golitko (713) 718-8629, if you have any questions or comments on this material.

GB: ToC.doc Prepared 2/6/08

Page 3: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Executive Summary Fall 2007 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and part-time faculty. Approximately 91,530 surveys were sent out in 4,980 envelopes; 58,604 surveys were returned to the Office of Institutional Research. The return rate for the paper surveys was 64% including late submissions. Instructors’ reports were provided to academic, workforce deans and to the respective executive secretaries on December 17, 2007 on a CD. Methods Used: The optical-scan survey instrument was created using ScanTools for Windows, by National Computer Systems. The scanned data were analyzed by OIR using SPSS 16.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students with the questionnaires were student comment sheets, which were later returned in their original hand-written form to the instructors via their respective deans’ offices. Library data were analyzed by subject and location and provided to library chairs for their use.

Page 4: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Overview of SEOI Responses, Fall 2007

In the responses discussed below, respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed, indicated that they were ‘neutral’, ‘had no basis for judgment’ or simply did not respond to the question. In Part I, Evaluation of Instruction:

• The course requirements in the syllabus were clearly stated; 90.9% of students agreed and 1.6% disagreed.

• The textbook used for this course is suitable; 85.2% of respondents agreed while 2.9% disagreed.

• Other instructional materials (tapes, handouts, web sites, etc.) used in this course enhanced my learning of the subject matter; 79.1% of respondents agreed, and 4.4% disagreed.

In Part II, Evaluation of Instructor:

• The instructor asks test questions that deal with material that is covered in the course; 92.2% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor communicates clearly; 88.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.1% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The assignments were relevant to the course; 92.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 1.6% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• My grades are an indication of learning; 84.8% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor treats students with respect; 92.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.0% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor is available for student consultation; 88.2% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor grades impartially; 80.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 7.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor gives me timely feedback on graded work; 86.5% agreed or strongly agreed, and 3.6% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part III, Lab Evaluation: In the section below, students who indicated an opinion are calculated in the agreement/disagreement percentages; those who indicated ‘no basis for judgment’ or did not respond were assumed not to be enrolled in laboratory or clinical courses.

• The instructor explains appropriate safety procedures for this laboratory/clinical; 85.3% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor links the laboratory exercises to lecture; 84.2% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.8% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part IV, Overall Evaluation:

• The instructor encourages me to become actively engaged in the learning process; 88.2% agreed or strongly agreed, and 3.1% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• I would recommend this instructor to other students; 85.4% agreed or strongly agreed, and 5.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Page 5: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

1.37.4

91.3

1.67.8

90.6

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=43015) Neutral (n=3611) No (n=708)

Responses (Total=47,334)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

85.8

2.5

11.7

2.812.1

85.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=39262) Neutral (n=5488) No (n=1233)

Responses (Total=45,983

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q1&2.xls Prepared:2/6/08

Page 6: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

79.7

16.4

3.9

17.6

4.6

77.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=34648) Neutral (n=7559) No (n=1914)Responses (Total=44,121)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q3.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 7: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

1.5

64.6

27.9

5.3 0.7

64.8

27.5

5.41.5 0.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=30725)

Agree(n=13143)

Neutral(n=2553)

Disagree(n=722)

StronglyDisagree(n=350)Responses (Total=47,493)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

2.57.2

25.5

63.7

1.1 1.42.97.9

25.3

62.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=30171)

Agree(n=12180)

Neutral(n=3659)

Disagree(n=1319)

StronglyDisagree(n=614)Responses (Total=47,943)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q4&5.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 8: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

5.4

27.7

65.4

0.51.0 0.61.05.9

28.0

64.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=30890)

Agree(n=12284)

Neutral(n=2713)

Disagree(n=463)

StronglyDisagree(n=258)

Responses (Total=46,608)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

1.33.2

11.1

30.1

54.4

1.23.0

11.1

29.6

55.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=26081)

Agree(n=14142)

Neutral(n=5268)

Disagree(n=1467)

StronglyDisagree(n=571)Responses (Total=47,529)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q6&7.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 9: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

0.7

60.9

27.2

9.5 1.7 0.7

61.3

26.89.7

1.60.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=28302)

Agree(n=12452)

Neutral(n=4437)

Disagree(n=744)

StronglyDisagree(n=316)Responses (Total=46,251)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

0.71.35.0

23.3

69.6

0.71.15.0

21.9

71.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=33708)

Agree(n=10708)

Neutral(n=2389)

Disagree(n=572)

StronglyDisagree(n=350)Responses (Total=47,727)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q8&9.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 10: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

1.0

58.0

28.4

10.0

2.5

58.5

27.910.0

2.6 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=27406)

Agree(n=13196)

Neutral(n=4706)

Disagree(n=1195)

StronglyDisagree(n=480)Responses (Total=46,983)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

54.1

26.1 12.44.6 2.8 3.04.8

53.6

25.2 13.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=24519)

Agree(n=11635)

Neutral(n=5925)

Disagree(n=2140)

StronglyDisagree(n=1341)Responses (Total=45,560)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors

Page 11: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

0.7

56.8

27.913.0

1.6

56.5

27.713.2

1.8 0.70.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=12194)

Agree (n=5985) Neutral(n=2824)

Disagree(n=378)

StronglyDisagree(n=158)Responses (Total=21,539)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

0.71.6

13.7

27.9

56.0

0.92.4

13.927.4

55.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=11968)

Agree (n=5934) Neutral(n=2967)

Disagree(n=461)

StronglyDisagree(n=171)

Responses (Total=21,501)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q12&13.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 12: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in the Learning Process

1.02.29.0

28.1

59.7 61.2

1.02.18.9

26.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=28824)

Agree(n=12975)

Neutral(n=4242)

Disagree(n=1006)

StronglyDisagree(n=464)Responses (Total=47,511)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

2.32.89.323.3

62.3

2.62.79.422.5

62.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=29490)

Agree(n=10755)

Neutral(n=4403)

Disagree(n=1298)

StronglyDisagree(n=1174)Responses (Total=47,120)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall 07_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q14&15.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 13: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

1.87.0

91.3

1.97.5

90.6

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=9185) Neutral (n=727) No (n=183)Responses (Total=10,095)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

11.9

3.7

84.5 84.5

11.63.9

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=8048) Neutral (n=1119) No (n=359)

Responses (Total=9,526)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q1&2.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 14: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

82.5

13.3

4.2

13.95.1

81.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=7671) Neutral (n=1268) No (n=431)Reponses (Total=9,370)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q3.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 15: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

1.7

61.8

29.3

6.4 0.9

64.3

27.6

5.5 1.8 0.90.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6260)

Agree(n=2838)

Neutral(n=594)

Disagree(n=174)

StronglyDisagree(n=87)Responses (Total=9,953)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

1.4

61.3

26.9

7.6 2.8

60.6

25.09.0 3.6 1.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6272)

Agree(n=2680)

Neutral(n=846)

Disagree(n=327)

StronglyDisagree(n=163)

Responses (Total=10,288)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q4&5.xls Prepared:2/6/08

Page 16: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

6.2

28.4

63.6

0.61.2 0.61.45.6

26.6

65.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6569)

Agree(n=2809)

Neutral(n=605)

Disagree(n=132)

StronglyDisagree(n=60)Responses (Total=10,175)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

54.2

30.3

10.7

3.3 1.6

56.8

29.3

9.8 3.1 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=5574)

Agree(n=3011)

Neutral(n=1035)

Disagree(n=321)

StronglyDisagree(n=133)Responses (Total=10,074)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q6&7.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 17: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

62.1

26.5

8.9 1.8 0.7 1.2

64.1

24.78.0

1.90.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6275)

Agree(n=2565)

Neutral(n=848)

Disagree(n=188)

StronglyDisagree(n=92)Responses (Total=9,968)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

1.11.65.9

23.9

67.5

1.01.34.6

22.6

70.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=7050)

Agree(n=2390)

Neutral(n=547)

Disagree(n=152)

StronglyDisagree(n=104)Responses (Total=10,243)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q8&9.xls Prepared:2/6/08

Page 18: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

1.4

59.2

27.7

9.3

2.4

61.3

26.3

8.5 2.6 1.20.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=5962)

Agree(n=2690)

Neutral(n=888)

Disagree(n=251)

StronglyDisagree(n=129)Responses (Total=9,920)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

57.7

25.7 10.44.1 2.0 2.43.9

58.4

24.3 11.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=5664)

Agree(n=2449)

Neutral(n=1042)

Disagree(n=392)

StronglyDisagree(n=217)Responses (Total=9,764)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q10&11.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 19: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

1.09.4

27.3

61.6

0.6 0.81.710.124.3

63.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=3865)

Agree(n=1618)

Neutral(n=604)

Disagree(n=82)

StronglyDisagree(n=41)Responses (Total=6,210)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

61.5

26.510.2

1.3 0.4 1.0

62.5

23.8 10.72.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=3842)

Agree(n=1573)

Neutral(n=648)

Disagree(n=99)

StronglyDisagree(n=43)

Responses (Total=6,205)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q12&13.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 20: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in theLearning Process

1.21.97.8

27.6

61.5 63.5

1.32.37.4

25.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6373)

Agree (n=2722) Neutral (n=779) Disagree(n=213)

StronglyDisagree(n=131)Responses (Total=10,218)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

3.02.89.023.4

61.9

3.23.58.821.4

63.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6338)

Agree(n=2284)

Neutral(n=903)

Disagree(n=317)

StronglyDisagree(n=314)

Responses (Total=10,156)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall07_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q14&15.xls Prepared: 2/6/08

Page 21: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 1 1 2 4Row % 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Willie L Gay Hall Count 276 169 100 8 7 108 668Row % 41.3% 25.3% 15.0% 1.2% 1.0% 16.2% 100.0%

Central Count 3261 2475 1781 282 138 2225 10162Row % 32.1% 24.4% 17.5% 2.8% 1.4% 21.9% 100.0%

Main Ctr - CE Count 93 54 46 7 103 303Row % 30.7% 17.8% 15.2% 2.3% 34.0% 100.0%

CE Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Coleman HS-Off Campus Count 11 7 3 1 6 28Row % 39.3% 25.0% 10.7% 3.6% 21.4% 100.0%

Health Sci Ctr Count 1,095 771 585 78 46 956 3531Row % 31.0% 21.8% 16.6% 2.2% 1.3% 27.1% 100.0%

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 1 2 17 20Row % 5.0% 10.0% 85.0% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 41 42 12 2 4 4 105Row % 39.0% 40.0% 11.4% 1.9% 3.8% 3.8% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NE Count 2 1 3Row % 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

Northline Ctr Count 1179 842 490 72 28 644 3255Row % 36.2% 25.9% 15.1% 2.2% 0.9% 19.8% 100.0%

Northeast Campus Count 134 84 39 14 6 62 339Row % 39.5% 24.8% 11.5% 4.1% 1.8% 18.3% 100.0%

NE Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Pinemont Ctr Count 352.0 182.0 101.0 18.0 7.0 153.0 813.0Row % 43.3% 22.4% 12.4% 2.2% 0.9% 18.8% 100.0%

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2007

TP: Fall07_library_means.xls 1 01-23-2008

Page 22: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2007

Northwest NW Dual Credit Count 5 7 3 1 16Row % 31.3% 43.8% 18.8% 6.3% 100.0%

Town&Country Ctr Count 2675 1973 1503 221 81 1960 8413Row % 31.8% 23.5% 17.9% 2.6% 1.0% 23.3% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NW Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Westgate Ctr Count 1240 759 669 75 23 1098 3864Row % 32.1% 19.6% 17.3% 1.9% 0.6% 28.4% 100.0%

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 7 3 2 6 18Row % 38.9% 16.7% 11.1% 33.3% 100.0%

Eastside Ctr Count 1997 1286 839 101 35 839 5097Row % 39.2% 25.2% 16.5% 2.0% 0.7% 16.5% 100.0%

SE Dual Credit Count 2 3 3 25 33Row % 6.1% 9.1% 9.1% 75.8% 100.0%

Southwest Gulfton Ctr Count 466 438 182 41 21 74 1222Row % 38.1% 35.8% 14.9% 3.4% 1.7% 6.1% 100.0%

Alief Ctr Count 1077 830 574 108 62 473 3124Row % 34.5% 26.6% 18.4% 3.5% 2.0% 15.1% 100.0%

Main Ctr - SW Count 1 1 3 5Row % 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 100.0%

Stafford Ctr Count 3343 2053 1513 213 91 1622 8835Row % 37.8% 23.2% 17.1% 2.4% 1.0% 18.4% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 11 7 2 2 22Row % 50.0% 31.8% 9.1% 9.1% 100.0%

West Loop Ctr Count 1820 1154 696 109 54 906 4739Row % 38.4% 24.4% 14.7% 2.3% 1.1% 19.1% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-SW Count 3 3Row % 100.0% 100.0%

TP: Fall07_library_means.xls 2 01-23-2008

Page 23: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 1 1 2 4Row % 25.0% 25.0% 50.0% 100.0%

Willie L Gay Hall Count 258 164 105 8 5 125 665Row % 38.8% 24.7% 15.8% 1.2% 0.8% 18.8% 100.0%

Central Count 3061 2298 1862 214 91 2540 10066Row % 30.4% 22.8% 18.5% 2.1% 0.9% 25.2% 100.0%

Main Ctr - CE Count 87 53 44 5 112 301Row % 28.9% 17.6% 14.6% 1.7% 37.2% 100.0%

CE Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Coleman HS-Off Campus Count 10 7 3 1 7 28Row % 35.7% 25.0% 10.7% 3.6% 25.0% 100.0%

Health Sci Ctr Count 1063 705 595 44 36 1070 3513Row % 30.3% 20.1% 16.9% 1.3% 1.0% 30.5% 100.0%

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 1 2 17 20Row % 5.0% 10.0% 85.0% 100.0%

Automotive Tech. Ctr Count 42 42 12 1 3 5 105Row % 40.0% 40.0% 11.4% 1.0% 2.9% 4.8% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NE Count 2 1 3Row % 66.7% 33.3% 100.0%

Northline Ctr Count 1111 836 492 45 24 735 3243Row % 34.3% 25.8% 15.2% 1.4% 0.7% 22.7% 100.0%

Northeast Campus Count 125 80 48 10 6 68 337Row % 37.1% 23.7% 14.2% 3.0% 1.8% 20.2% 100.0%

NE Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Pinemont Ctr Count 323.0 174.0 111.0 12.0 4.0 185.0 809.0Row % 39.9% 21.5% 13.7% 1.5% 0.5% 22.9% 100.0%

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2007

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

TP: Fall2007_library_means.xls 1 01-23-2008

Page 24: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for

JudgementTotal

Research for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2007

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

Northwest NW Dual Credit Count 6 6 3 1 16Row % 37.5% 37.5% 18.8% 6.3% 100.0%

Town&Country Ctr Count 2552 1805 1545 140 67 2224 8333Row % 30.6% 21.7% 18.5% 1.7% 0.8% 26.7% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-NW Count 1 1Row % 100.0% 100.0%

Westgate Ctr Count 1195 699 665 50 16 1213 3838Row % 31.1% 18.2% 17.3% 1.3% 0.4% 31.6% 100.0%

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 6 3 2 7 18Row % 33.3% 16.7% 11.1% 38.9% 100.0%

Eastside Ctr Count 1884 1253 836 67 27 994 5061Row % 37.2% 24.8% 16.5% 1.3% 0.5% 19.6% 100.0%

SE Dual Credit Count 2.0 1.0 2.0 28.0 33.0Row % 6.1% 3.0% 6.1% 84.8% 100.0%

Southwest Gulfton Ctr Count 421 443 181 35 13 122 1215Row % 34.7% 36.5% 14.9% 2.9% 1.1% 10.0% 100.0%

Alief Ctr Count 1026 824 577 82 39 550 3098Row % 33.1% 26.6% 18.6% 2.6% 1.3% 17.8% 100.0%

Main Ctr - SW Count 1 1 3 5Row % 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 100.0%

Stafford Ctr Count 3173 1974 1531 149 59 1874 8760Row % 36.2% 22.5% 17.5% 1.7% 0.7% 21.4% 100.0%

Missouri City Ctr Count 11 7 2 2 22Row % 50.0% 31.8% 9.1% 9.1% 100.0%

West Loop Ctr Count 1709 1077 708 61 36 1108 4699Row % 36.4% 22.9% 15.1% 1.3% 0.8% 23.6% 100.0%

Distance Ed.-SW Count 3 3Row % 100.0% 100.0%

TP: Fall2007_library_means.xls 2 01-23-2008

Page 25: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ANTH Central

N 42 41 40 43 43 43 43 43 39 40 42 6 5 43 43 Mean 1.07 1.27 1.08 1.42 1.60 1.49 1.77 1.44 1.41 1.65 1.69 1.33 1.20 1.74 1.72

Northeast

N 13 12 12 13 13 12 13 13 13 11 13 3 3 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.42 1.00 1.54 1.38 1.42 1.46 1.31 1.38 1.64 1.62 2.33 2.67 1.46 1.31

Northwest

N 71 70 67 71 71 71 71 71 64 67 69 9 9 70 70 Mean 1.06 1.07 1.06 1.32 1.32 1.35 1.68 1.21 1.34 1.46 1.41 1.56 1.56 1.44 1.56

Southeast

N 16 15 14 16 16 16 16 16 15 15 16 3 3 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.14 1.19 1.13 1.19 1.38 1.13 1.47 1.67 1.63 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.38

Southwest

N 59 55 58 59 59 59 58 59 56 55 59 17 16 57 58 Mean 1.03 1.35 1.16 1.37 1.58 1.41 1.72 1.29 1.52 1.73 1.51 1.94 2.13 1.63 1.53

N 201 193 191 202 202 201 201 202 187 188 199 38 36 199 200 Mean 1.05 1.22 1.09 1.36 1.45 1.39 1.67 1.28 1.42 1.61 1.53 1.71 1.81 1.56 1.56

ARAB Northwest

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 2.25 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 2.25 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

ARTS Central

N 492 399 462 463 496 492 484 489 479 459 484 241 245 494 484 Mean 1.07 1.14 1.14 1.36 1.31 1.30 1.49 1.25 1.34 1.58 1.39 1.33 1.33 1.43 1.42

Northeast

N 177 173 174 178 182 182 180 182 176 169 179 55 56 182 180 Mean 1.10 1.05 1.11 1.29 1.31 1.29 1.36 1.25 1.33 1.69 1.47 1.38 1.34 1.36 1.31

Northwest

N 381 299 353 353 381 382 379 379 360 364 371 137 135 378 374 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.17 1.41 1.41 1.35 1.56 1.30 1.40 1.67 1.44 1.57 1.61 1.48 1.45

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 1 01/23/2008

Page 26: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ARTS Southeast

N 152 147 145 151 151 151 152 152 145 140 149 41 41 148 145 Mean 1.09 1.13 1.13 1.40 1.38 1.39 1.51 1.28 1.44 1.86 1.54 1.49 1.61 1.53 1.45

Southwest

N 391 358 379 378 399 397 396 397 384 385 386 172 168 396 393 Mean 1.14 1.21 1.21 1.52 1.57 1.47 1.61 1.40 1.51 1.72 1.54 1.70 1.76 1.55 1.62

N 1593 1376 1513 1523 1609 1604 1591 1599 1544 1517 1569 646 645 1598 1576 Mean 1.09 1.15 1.16 1.41 1.41 1.36 1.52 1.30 1.40 1.67 1.46 1.50 1.52 1.47 1.46

ASTR Central

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 Mean 1.60 1.20 1.20 1.60 3.00 2.00 2.20 1.80 2.20 1.60 2.40 2.00 1.50 2.60 2.20

Northwest

N 15 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 14 17 17 9 9 17 17 Mean 1.07 1.06 1.13 1.76 1.76 1.65 2.00 1.53 1.93 1.94 1.82 1.67 1.78 1.88 2.12

Southwest

N 9 9 9 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 2 2 10 10 Mean 1.00 1.22 1.22 1.30 1.10 1.30 1.30 1.10 1.22 1.78 1.30 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.20

N 29 30 30 32 32 32 32 32 28 31 32 13 13 32 32 Mean 1.14 1.13 1.17 1.59 1.75 1.59 1.81 1.44 1.75 1.84 1.75 1.62 1.62 1.84 1.84

BCIS Central

N 77 75 71 77 76 76 77 77 74 73 74 37 39 77 75 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.17 1.40 1.75 1.45 1.68 1.45 1.54 1.67 1.85 1.86 1.77 1.55 1.68

Northeast

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 5 10 10 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.20 1.50 1.30

Northwest

N 109 108 106 111 111 111 111 110 110 109 106 66 71 111 109 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.16 1.44 1.47 1.33 1.46 1.35 1.38 1.55 1.37 1.42 1.42 1.41 1.39

Southwest

N 95 95 91 97 98 98 97 97 96 95 96 51 57 96 97 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.24 1.51 1.69 1.43 1.45 1.39 1.61 1.76 1.54 1.67 1.56 1.70 1.71

N 291 288 278 295 295 295 295 294 290 287 286 159 172 294 291

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 2 01/23/2008

Page 27: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.09 1.14 1.18 1.44 1.61 1.39 1.50 1.38 1.49 1.64 1.55 1.60 1.54 1.54 1.57

BIOL Central

N 743 723 701 753 754 742 751 750 709 721 743 598 595 751 745 Mean 1.06 1.22 1.25 1.52 1.62 1.48 1.77 1.38 1.53 1.76 1.55 1.45 1.49 1.60 1.70

Coleman

N 57 56 54 57 56 57 57 57 55 54 56 56 57 57 57 Mean 1.12 1.09 1.17 1.53 1.82 1.40 1.56 1.39 1.62 1.70 1.30 1.48 1.63 1.47 1.58

Northeast

N 503 498 480 507 507 500 503 506 494 485 499 488 485 508 506 Mean 1.08 1.12 1.17 1.34 1.42 1.33 1.47 1.29 1.41 1.65 1.46 1.32 1.34 1.42 1.44

Northwest

N 892 868 835 900 899 888 894 896 862 852 884 867 869 896 896 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.26 1.44 1.73 1.45 1.76 1.50 1.67 1.88 1.58 1.50 1.51 1.65 1.72

Southeast

N 509 500 481 512 513 510 507 511 494 490 498 476 481 511 514 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.17 1.38 1.47 1.36 1.55 1.24 1.40 1.72 1.41 1.38 1.38 1.42 1.44

Southwest

N 1099 1089 1034 1118 1111 1086 1107 1109 1059 1078 1102 982 982 1110 1101 Mean 1.25 1.19 1.37 1.85 2.14 1.80 2.09 1.63 1.85 2.03 1.90 1.81 1.85 1.97 2.18

N 3803 3734 3585 3847 3840 3783 3819 3829 3673 3680 3782 3467 3469 3833 3819 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.26 1.56 1.75 1.53 1.79 1.45 1.62 1.85 1.62 1.54 1.56 1.67 1.77

CHEM Central

N 293 286 266 298 296 292 293 294 288 290 293 295 291 297 294 Mean 1.10 1.16 1.26 1.40 1.75 1.46 1.69 1.41 1.48 1.67 1.54 1.33 1.51 1.64 1.74

Northeast

N 77 76 77 80 79 80 80 80 77 76 78 80 79 80 80 Mean 1.05 1.24 1.19 1.24 1.44 1.30 1.49 1.43 1.43 1.61 1.45 1.35 1.35 1.39 1.39

Northwest

N 426 420 406 432 431 431 431 428 413 416 431 426 424 433 427 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.20 1.39 1.63 1.39 1.71 1.35 1.47 1.63 1.53 1.32 1.46 1.55 1.64

Southeast

N 167 167 157 169 169 167 168 168 166 165 166 166 165 168 167

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 3 01/23/2008

Page 28: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.11 1.18 1.30 1.53 1.88 1.53 1.80 1.63 1.67 1.76 1.65 1.51 1.62 1.70 1.73

CHEM Southwest

N 371 357 346 381 385 379 382 384 375 367 376 359 357 383 382 Mean 1.10 1.28 1.24 1.45 1.67 1.49 1.77 1.33 1.52 1.73 1.55 1.31 1.48 1.68 1.66

N 1334 1306 1252 1360 1360 1349 1354 1354 1319 1314 1344 1326 1316 1361 1350 Mean 1.08 1.18 1.23 1.42 1.69 1.44 1.72 1.40 1.51 1.68 1.55 1.34 1.49 1.61 1.66

CHIN Central

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 2 2 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.10 1.00 1.27 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.20 1.18 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 11 2 2 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.10 1.00 1.27 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.20 1.18 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09

COMM Central

N 44 44 43 43 43 44 43 43 41 41 44 5 5 43 43 Mean 1.20 1.20 1.35 1.81 1.63 1.50 1.88 1.40 1.63 1.90 1.95 2.00 2.00 1.53 1.74

Northwest

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 15 15 2 2 15 15 Mean 1.13 1.33 1.00 1.20 1.33 1.27 1.40 1.14 1.20 1.60 1.60 2.00 2.00 1.33 1.13

Southwest

N 51 48 46 52 52 52 51 52 46 51 50 17 16 51 51 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.09 1.37 1.31 1.31 1.47 1.17 1.33 1.65 1.68 1.24 1.31 1.35 1.31

N 110 107 104 110 110 111 109 109 102 107 109 24 23 109 109 Mean 1.14 1.17 1.18 1.52 1.44 1.38 1.62 1.26 1.43 1.74 1.78 1.46 1.52 1.42 1.46

COSC Central

N 38 38 35 38 38 37 38 38 37 38 38 23 29 38 38 Mean 1.03 1.05 1.14 1.45 1.71 1.43 1.50 1.32 1.54 1.82 1.55 1.61 1.45 1.39 1.66

Northwest

N 36 36 34 37 37 37 37 36 35 34 36 15 18 37 36 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.24 1.49 1.97 1.49 1.84 1.61 1.71 1.76 1.64 1.60 1.78 1.92 2.08

Southwest

N 42 41 38 42 42 42 41 42 42 39 42 24 26 41 41 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.24 1.55 1.79 1.48 1.85 1.60 1.76 1.72 1.69 1.63 1.50 2.00 1.83

N 116 115 107 117 117 116 116 116 114 111 116 62 73 116 115 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.21 1.50 1.82 1.47 1.73 1.51 1.68 1.77 1.63 1.61 1.55 1.78 1.85

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 4 01/23/2008

Page 29: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CRIJ Northeast

N 28 29 27 28 29 29 29 29 28 27 29 3 3 29 29 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.07 1.21 1.24 1.24 1.45 1.14 1.21 1.44 1.31 1.33 1.33 1.31 1.28

Northwest

N 28 28 27 29 29 29 29 29 29 28 28 4 4 29 28 Mean 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.24 1.34 1.17 1.21 1.36 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.31 1.18

Southeast

N 13 12 11 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 6 5 13 13 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.31 1.15 1.15 1.69 1.31 1.50 1.40 1.08 1.15

Southwest

N 47 46 44 48 48 48 49 48 46 47 47 14 13 49 48 Mean 1.06 1.04 1.09 1.21 1.33 1.31 1.41 1.10 1.22 1.83 1.30 1.21 1.38 1.18 1.25

N 116 115 109 118 119 119 120 119 116 115 117 27 25 120 118 Mean 1.04 1.07 1.06 1.19 1.25 1.26 1.39 1.13 1.21 1.61 1.29 1.30 1.36 1.23 1.23

DANC Central

N 120 64 114 114 120 121 111 121 115 111 113 51 49 120 121 Mean 1.05 1.20 1.11 1.32 1.41 1.31 1.51 1.36 1.49 1.61 1.55 1.29 1.33 1.39 1.52

Northwest

N 57 23 48 53 60 60 56 59 56 51 55 32 27 59 59 Mean 1.05 1.13 1.06 1.21 1.13 1.20 1.34 1.14 1.18 1.65 1.45 1.22 1.19 1.19 1.15

N 177 87 162 167 180 181 167 180 171 162 168 83 76 179 180 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.09 1.29 1.32 1.28 1.46 1.28 1.39 1.62 1.52 1.27 1.28 1.32 1.40

DRAM Central

N 38 37 36 38 38 38 38 38 36 37 38 17 18 38 36 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.24 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.26 1.28 1.27 1.24 1.24 1.28 1.13 1.17

Northeast

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 3 3 11 11 Mean 1.09 1.27 1.00 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.55 1.18 1.30 2.30 1.27 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.18

Northwest

N 46 33 38 39 49 49 48 49 48 46 44 14 14 49 49 Mean 1.04 1.24 1.16 1.51 1.18 1.24 1.46 1.29 1.33 1.63 1.43 1.93 1.93 1.18 1.18

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 5 01/23/2008

Page 30: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DRAM Southwest

N 50 45 47 49 48 50 50 49 47 48 50 21 20 50 50 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.06 1.31 1.29 1.28 1.50 1.29 1.36 1.67 1.44 1.33 1.30 1.34 1.40

N 145 126 131 137 146 148 147 147 141 141 143 55 55 148 146 Mean 1.07 1.16 1.08 1.34 1.23 1.24 1.41 1.27 1.33 1.60 1.37 1.44 1.44 1.23 1.25

ECON Central

N 161 157 144 161 161 161 158 161 153 149 153 63 58 159 158 Mean 1.22 1.16 1.28 1.54 1.84 1.56 1.67 1.48 1.66 1.81 1.83 1.92 1.93 1.60 1.68

Northeast

N 47 47 42 47 47 45 47 47 47 45 47 21 20 47 47 Mean 1.13 1.17 1.21 1.49 1.34 1.27 1.77 1.26 1.30 1.71 1.45 1.48 1.60 1.30 1.32

Northwest

N 254 248 210 256 256 247 257 256 244 248 251 43 42 255 255 Mean 1.10 1.36 1.37 1.51 1.66 1.54 1.87 1.46 1.58 1.83 1.60 1.67 1.69 1.56 1.65

Southeast

N 108 109 90 111 109 108 108 110 100 97 110 19 19 108 108 Mean 1.19 1.29 1.56 1.50 2.09 1.57 1.89 1.55 1.87 1.97 1.78 1.68 1.74 1.69 1.78

Southwest

N 430 420 380 436 435 424 433 435 416 420 428 121 115 430 427 Mean 1.12 1.20 1.37 1.61 1.69 1.56 1.85 1.58 1.66 1.89 1.80 1.78 1.81 1.69 1.81

N 1000 981 866 1011 1008 985 1003 1009 960 959 989 267 254 999 995 Mean 1.14 1.24 1.37 1.56 1.73 1.54 1.83 1.52 1.64 1.86 1.74 1.76 1.80 1.62 1.72

EDUC Central

N 7 7 5 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.43 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 . . 1.00 1.00

Northwest

N 18 17 16 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 2 2 18 18 Mean 1.33 1.12 1.31 2.00 2.11 1.89 2.28 1.22 1.59 1.59 1.65 1.00 2.00 1.61 1.94

Southeast

N 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 2 3 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.22 1.00 1.11 1.22 1.11 2.00 1.67 1.11 1.00

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 6 01/23/2008

Page 31: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

EDUC Southwest

N 63 63 62 62 63 63 62 63 61 59 62 14 13 63 63 Mean 1.02 1.14 1.15 1.60 1.59 1.37 1.69 1.46 1.43 1.90 1.52 1.64 1.69 1.32 1.70

N 97 95 91 96 97 97 96 97 94 92 95 18 18 97 97 Mean 1.07 1.13 1.15 1.57 1.60 1.40 1.74 1.34 1.39 1.71 1.47 1.61 1.72 1.33 1.63

ENGD Central

N 293 290 267 294 294 292 295 292 295 285 291 133 128 289 287 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.28 1.49 1.51 1.46 1.69 1.41 1.55 2.08 1.62 1.85 1.86 1.56 1.57

Northeast

N 191 191 177 190 195 194 194 193 188 185 190 57 56 189 188 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.28 1.58 1.50 1.39 1.56 1.36 1.63 1.89 1.61 1.74 1.79 1.46 1.52

Northwest

N 238 242 242 246 247 247 244 246 241 236 244 136 135 247 242 Mean 1.17 1.26 1.31 1.62 1.66 1.53 1.80 1.50 1.61 1.87 1.85 1.86 1.84 1.72 1.73

Southeast

N 165 165 157 167 168 167 163 167 167 156 161 86 85 169 169 Mean 1.22 1.48 1.37 1.65 1.57 1.59 1.64 1.53 1.58 1.86 1.61 2.03 2.02 1.64 1.70

Southwest

N 413 409 395 418 419 417 412 416 413 405 413 268 272 416 409 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.25 1.53 1.45 1.41 1.61 1.39 1.45 1.85 1.55 1.69 1.67 1.46 1.49

N 1300 1297 1238 1315 1323 1317 1308 1314 1304 1267 1299 680 676 1310 1295 Mean 1.11 1.21 1.29 1.56 1.52 1.46 1.66 1.43 1.54 1.91 1.64 1.80 1.79 1.56 1.58

ENGF Central

N 254 241 240 261 260 260 262 260 260 261 255 157 156 257 254 Mean 1.18 1.31 1.28 1.59 1.58 1.63 1.84 1.58 1.67 1.82 1.78 1.78 1.79 1.72 1.85

Northeast

N 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 4 4 6 6 Mean 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.43 2.29 2.86 2.43 2.17 2.86 2.57 2.71 3.25 3.25 3.17 3.00

Northwest

N 96 94 90 96 96 98 95 98 98 97 94 43 43 96 96 Mean 1.15 1.16 1.26 1.47 1.39 1.43 1.42 1.23 1.41 1.61 1.46 1.58 1.65 1.46 1.45

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 7 01/23/2008

Page 32: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ENGF Southwest

N 352 343 337 357 357 353 357 358 356 357 353 265 262 355 353 Mean 1.23 1.27 1.26 1.62 1.59 1.61 1.70 1.51 1.59 1.71 1.64 1.69 1.73 1.65 1.74

N 708 684 673 721 720 718 721 722 721 722 709 469 465 714 709 Mean 1.20 1.28 1.27 1.60 1.57 1.60 1.72 1.50 1.60 1.74 1.68 1.72 1.75 1.66 1.75

ENGL Central

N 892 887 838 853 903 902 881 897 881 844 881 346 336 893 883 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.23 1.47 1.45 1.43 1.66 1.37 1.52 1.83 1.68 1.71 1.72 1.51 1.56

Northeast

N 455 447 416 443 462 464 458 460 448 425 462 122 114 462 462 Mean 1.15 1.19 1.32 1.54 1.59 1.45 1.59 1.44 1.59 1.92 1.63 1.73 1.74 1.52 1.61

Northwest

N 1109 1088 1039 1047 1119 1114 1103 1115 1073 1038 1096 293 280 1116 1100 Mean 1.12 1.14 1.27 1.58 1.57 1.46 1.76 1.49 1.56 1.87 1.66 1.74 1.85 1.59 1.69

Southeast

N 460 455 438 449 463 462 461 459 450 438 461 122 124 462 457 Mean 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.49 1.45 1.39 1.57 1.36 1.45 1.90 1.60 1.78 1.77 1.48 1.55

Southwest

N 1688 1662 1616 1656 1707 1701 1695 1699 1665 1623 1686 599 581 1706 1694 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.19 1.40 1.40 1.34 1.60 1.31 1.39 1.74 1.52 1.61 1.62 1.45 1.52

N 4604 4539 4347 4448 4654 4643 4598 4630 4517 4368 4586 1482 1435 4639 4596 Mean 1.11 1.14 1.23 1.48 1.48 1.40 1.65 1.38 1.48 1.82 1.60 1.68 1.71 1.51 1.58

ENGR Northwest

N 16 14 12 17 18 18 17 18 17 16 16 5 4 18 17 Mean 1.44 1.57 1.83 2.18 3.06 1.89 2.18 1.28 2.00 1.69 1.75 1.80 1.50 2.22 2.82

Southeast

N 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 2.00 1.00

Southwest

N 41 39 37 41 41 40 40 40 37 37 37 21 21 40 41 Mean 1.17 1.33 1.35 1.54 1.88 1.73 1.85 1.35 1.78 1.81 1.92 1.86 1.81 1.63 1.90

N 59 55 51 60 61 60 59 60 56 54 55 27 26 60 59

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 8 01/23/2008

Page 33: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.24 1.38 1.45 1.70 2.20 1.75 1.92 1.32 1.86 1.76 1.84 1.81 1.81 1.82 2.15

ENVR Central

N 61 59 54 62 61 61 62 62 58 58 61 20 20 60 61 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.28 1.79 1.98 1.67 1.92 1.40 1.74 2.21 1.95 2.40 2.45 1.90 2.07

Northwest

N 30 29 29 30 30 30 30 29 30 29 29 11 10 30 30 Mean 1.10 1.21 1.14 1.53 1.37 1.33 1.43 1.17 1.37 1.31 1.41 1.09 1.10 1.50 1.53

Southeast

N 36 34 33 36 35 36 36 36 35 32 36 8 8 35 35 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.24 1.56 1.89 1.61 1.94 1.56 1.71 1.84 1.67 1.50 1.50 1.69 1.91

Southwest

N 80 78 73 82 82 79 79 81 79 75 81 17 15 81 81 Mean 1.16 1.24 1.45 1.83 2.51 1.91 2.20 1.90 1.97 1.91 2.07 2.18 2.20 2.31 2.42

N 207 200 189 210 208 206 207 208 202 194 207 56 53 206 207 Mean 1.12 1.18 1.32 1.73 2.09 1.70 1.96 1.59 1.77 1.90 1.87 1.95 1.98 1.97 2.10

ESOL Central

N 462 448 453 483 486 484 481 486 481 482 479 446 441 479 470 Mean 1.21 1.30 1.33 1.59 1.62 1.70 1.73 1.59 1.62 1.71 1.68 1.66 1.75 1.68 1.68

Northeast

N 286 288 282 295 298 296 286 298 297 288 283 63 70 295 294 Mean 1.19 1.24 1.28 1.66 1.52 1.65 1.60 1.41 1.53 1.60 1.70 2.05 1.91 1.73 1.73

Northwest

N 351 345 344 352 352 352 350 350 348 344 349 287 318 346 342 Mean 1.17 1.21 1.38 1.60 1.60 1.63 1.69 1.51 1.61 1.64 1.68 1.63 1.64 1.63 1.60

Southeast

N 413 410 406 424 424 422 421 420 419 414 418 230 227 421 417 Mean 1.15 1.23 1.32 1.48 1.44 1.56 1.54 1.40 1.48 1.56 1.52 1.43 1.48 1.53 1.57

Southwest

N 1715 1670 1678 1768 1766 1749 1759 1746 1741 1753 1747 705 783 1696 1696 Mean 1.17 1.23 1.25 1.49 1.47 1.56 1.62 1.49 1.51 1.54 1.55 1.58 1.60 1.57 1.57

N 3227 3161 3163 3322 3326 3303 3297 3300 3286 3281 3276 1731 1839 3237 3219 Mean 1.18 1.24 1.29 1.53 1.51 1.59 1.63 1.49 1.54 1.58 1.59 1.61 1.64 1.60 1.60

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 9 01/23/2008

Page 34: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

FREN Central

N 39 36 34 40 39 39 39 39 34 35 37 11 10 40 40 Mean 1.26 1.42 1.41 1.50 2.03 1.56 2.00 2.00 1.91 2.03 1.57 2.18 2.10 1.75 2.05

Northeast

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 3 4 5 5 Mean 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.60 2.40 2.00 1.80 1.40 1.25 2.00 1.60 1.33 1.25 2.00 1.80

Northwest

N 31 32 31 33 33 33 33 33 32 31 32 13 13 32 33 Mean 1.29 1.16 1.23 1.39 1.55 1.39 1.67 1.52 1.50 1.48 1.56 2.00 1.92 1.47 1.61

Southwest

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 1 1 14 14 Mean 1.07 1.20 1.13 1.20 1.27 1.27 1.53 1.07 1.27 1.57 1.27 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.21

N 90 88 85 93 92 92 92 92 85 84 89 28 28 91 92 Mean 1.24 1.28 1.29 1.42 1.75 1.48 1.79 1.64 1.61 1.75 1.52 1.96 1.86 1.59 1.75

GEOG Central

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 5 4 10 9 Mean 1.18 1.09 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.45 1.27 1.36 1.40 1.45 1.40 1.50 1.10 1.11

Northeast

N 10 9 8 10 10 9 10 10 9 9 10 3 3 9 10 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.50 1.20 1.22 1.60 1.10 1.22 1.67 1.30 2.33 2.33 1.11 1.20

Northwest

N 49 48 45 50 50 50 50 50 47 44 50 8 8 50 50 Mean 1.04 1.13 1.04 1.28 1.20 1.24 1.84 1.16 1.30 1.82 1.40 1.88 1.88 1.34 1.26

Southeast

N 22 20 20 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 21 7 7 22 22 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.05 1.32 1.45 1.27 1.50 1.73 1.41 1.48 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.27 1.45

Southwest

N 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 2 2 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.17 1.14 1.29 1.00 1.43 1.00 1.14 1.29 1.29 2.00 2.00 1.29 1.00

N 99 95 90 100 100 99 100 100 96 91 99 25 24 98 98 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.10 1.31 1.28 1.24 1.67 1.28 1.31 1.64 1.39 1.72 1.75 1.28 1.27

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 10 01/23/2008

Page 35: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GEOL Central

N 39 39 37 39 39 39 38 39 39 39 39 36 38 38 39 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.14 1.44 1.49 1.46 1.74 1.46 1.56 1.82 1.56 1.47 1.42 1.84 1.56

Northwest

N 95 89 91 95 95 94 94 94 91 93 91 86 87 94 92 Mean 1.05 1.17 1.10 1.34 1.37 1.32 1.57 1.16 1.34 1.35 1.33 1.36 1.31 1.37 1.37

Southeast

N 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 13 14 13 13 15 14 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.27 1.80 1.40 1.67 1.13 1.29 1.38 1.50 1.62 1.69 1.53 1.36

Southwest

N 108 107 103 111 111 110 110 110 106 109 109 95 100 111 109 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.12 1.59 1.81 1.49 1.81 1.36 1.54 1.83 1.61 1.57 1.39 1.67 1.86

N 257 250 246 260 260 258 257 258 250 254 253 230 238 258 254 Mean 1.07 1.15 1.11 1.46 1.60 1.42 1.70 1.29 1.46 1.63 1.50 1.48 1.38 1.58 1.61

GERM Central

N 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 8 9 15 15 Mean 1.07 1.67 1.00 1.13 1.07 1.27 1.47 1.07 1.33 1.29 1.07 1.25 1.11 1.07 1.00

N 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 8 9 15 15 Mean 1.07 1.67 1.00 1.13 1.07 1.27 1.47 1.07 1.33 1.29 1.07 1.25 1.11 1.07 1.00

GOVT Central

N 468 461 417 476 476 450 469 476 446 453 462 132 127 468 466 Mean 1.26 1.23 1.47 1.89 2.08 1.78 2.12 1.62 1.88 2.02 2.01 1.90 1.99 1.92 2.12

Northeast

N 211 210 192 213 213 211 212 213 204 204 211 64 60 211 212 Mean 1.13 1.13 1.34 1.49 1.58 1.49 1.60 1.47 1.63 1.92 1.63 1.81 1.75 1.60 1.59

Northwest

N 815 807 726 830 831 821 828 830 775 789 821 152 143 823 820 Mean 1.10 1.23 1.27 1.52 1.56 1.48 1.76 1.39 1.56 1.72 1.62 1.69 1.73 1.62 1.68

Southeast

N 295 277 279 294 297 295 294 294 290 272 289 87 84 292 292 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.23 1.47 1.46 1.37 1.68 1.25 1.49 1.83 1.57 1.80 1.73 1.41 1.48

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 11 01/23/2008

Page 36: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GOVT Southwest

N 1145 1113 1043 1157 1154 1135 1140 1149 1102 1096 1118 310 290 1145 1138 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.28 1.43 1.46 1.43 1.68 1.41 1.56 1.85 1.60 1.68 1.73 1.54 1.54

N 2934 2868 2657 2970 2971 2912 2943 2962 2817 2814 2901 745 704 2939 2928 Mean 1.12 1.18 1.30 1.54 1.60 1.50 1.77 1.43 1.61 1.84 1.67 1.75 1.78 1.62 1.67

GUST Central

N 942 931 896 954 953 950 943 952 927 911 934 546 544 942 935 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.35 1.47 1.51 1.48 1.71 1.46 1.61 2.02 1.71 1.73 1.78 1.53 1.58

Northeast

N 531 523 505 542 542 539 532 538 521 509 521 262 257 539 534 Mean 1.11 1.23 1.24 1.43 1.45 1.44 1.58 1.48 1.62 1.75 1.69 1.65 1.72 1.46 1.58

Northwest

N 1208 1210 1173 1225 1221 1224 1214 1215 1198 1176 1199 518 531 1206 1187 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.23 1.35 1.39 1.41 1.53 1.34 1.47 1.71 1.53 1.67 1.69 1.47 1.45

Southeast

N 620 626 600 627 628 627 621 620 617 585 609 418 423 619 611 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.27 1.37 1.44 1.44 1.53 1.27 1.49 1.80 1.54 1.65 1.62 1.38 1.41

Southwest

N 2037 2030 1948 2087 2086 2087 2076 2075 2044 1980 2037 1348 1352 2071 2040 Mean 1.10 1.10 1.27 1.43 1.47 1.47 1.60 1.44 1.56 1.83 1.70 1.67 1.68 1.49 1.57

N 5338 5320 5122 5435 5430 5427 5386 5400 5307 5161 5300 3092 3107 5377 5307 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.27 1.41 1.45 1.45 1.59 1.41 1.55 1.83 1.64 1.68 1.69 1.48 1.53

HIST Central

N 606 586 547 612 610 607 611 609 577 581 596 206 198 602 591 Mean 1.09 1.22 1.26 1.35 1.36 1.36 1.63 1.31 1.46 1.71 1.56 1.65 1.66 1.50 1.44

Northeast

N 204 202 191 205 205 204 202 203 196 179 203 53 50 205 203 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.19 1.41 1.59 1.45 1.71 1.28 1.61 1.86 1.69 1.91 1.96 1.66 1.67

Northwest

N 916 901 861 921 922 917 916 916 869 865 902 188 175 905 894 Mean 1.10 1.34 1.31 1.59 1.52 1.54 1.90 1.44 1.58 1.85 1.75 1.78 1.76 1.75 1.80

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 12 01/23/2008

Page 37: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HIST Southeast

N 318 309 301 316 321 318 318 318 310 302 309 92 89 318 317 Mean 1.08 1.28 1.31 1.33 1.36 1.38 1.69 1.29 1.43 1.80 1.53 1.65 1.66 1.55 1.50

Southwest

N 1237 1165 1166 1252 1248 1230 1232 1243 1194 1186 1234 335 321 1244 1234 Mean 1.07 1.29 1.21 1.44 1.41 1.41 1.67 1.30 1.51 1.83 1.59 1.67 1.71 1.56 1.52

N 3281 3163 3066 3306 3306 3276 3279 3289 3146 3113 3244 874 833 3274 3239 Mean 1.09 1.28 1.26 1.45 1.44 1.44 1.73 1.34 1.52 1.81 1.63 1.70 1.72 1.61 1.59

HUMA Central

N 61 60 53 58 61 61 57 60 56 53 57 14 12 61 60 Mean 1.13 1.15 1.26 1.55 1.57 1.51 1.79 1.38 1.61 2.00 1.72 1.71 1.75 1.43 1.58

Northeast

N 29 29 27 29 30 29 29 30 29 26 27 8 7 30 30 Mean 1.03 1.31 1.07 1.45 1.43 1.34 1.41 1.33 1.52 1.73 1.56 1.88 2.00 1.43 1.47

Northwest

N 45 44 44 45 45 45 44 45 44 44 45 11 10 43 43 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.11 1.53 1.69 1.67 1.73 1.38 1.59 2.07 1.73 1.73 1.80 1.56 1.77

Southeast

N 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 6 6 24 23 Mean 1.38 1.46 1.17 1.38 1.63 1.54 1.58 1.38 1.67 1.50 1.67 1.50 1.50 1.63 1.70

Southwest

N 47 46 43 45 47 47 47 48 45 43 45 11 12 48 48 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.23 1.56 1.60 1.53 1.87 1.21 1.20 1.74 1.67 1.73 1.67 1.38 1.60

N 206 203 191 201 207 206 201 207 198 190 198 50 47 206 204 Mean 1.13 1.23 1.18 1.51 1.59 1.53 1.72 1.33 1.51 1.86 1.68 1.72 1.74 1.47 1.62

JAPN Central

N 26 26 25 26 26 26 25 26 24 25 25 9 11 25 26 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.04 1.12 1.35 1.15 1.36 1.08 1.33 1.20 1.40 1.11 1.09 1.08 1.08

Northwest

N 17 17 16 17 17 17 16 17 17 17 17 1 1 17 17 Mean 1.18 1.18 1.00 1.29 1.71 1.29 1.63 1.06 1.41 1.24 1.35 1.00 1.00 1.24 1.29

N 43 43 41 43 43 43 41 43 41 42 42 10 12 42 43

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 13 01/23/2008

Page 38: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.07 1.12 1.02 1.19 1.49 1.21 1.46 1.07 1.37 1.21 1.38 1.10 1.08 1.14 1.16

MATD Central

N 712 695 644 726 721 722 716 721 695 689 709 373 378 717 709 Mean 1.12 1.13 1.37 1.53 1.87 1.49 1.79 1.48 1.78 1.96 1.82 1.81 1.79 1.84 1.91

Northeast

N 620 610 556 626 626 624 624 623 605 584 619 256 260 624 622 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.34 1.41 1.64 1.37 1.66 1.34 1.62 1.90 1.67 1.66 1.69 1.62 1.62

Northwest

N 1032 1013 950 1037 1042 1040 1039 1038 1013 983 1023 383 391 1029 1018 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.27 1.30 1.46 1.33 1.59 1.26 1.48 1.69 1.53 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.49

Southeast

N 650 591 606 641 652 653 647 652 636 599 637 294 296 648 642 Mean 1.05 1.24 1.32 1.41 1.56 1.38 1.60 1.33 1.54 1.93 1.65 1.71 1.74 1.48 1.50

Southwest

N 1710 1684 1612 1733 1738 1723 1726 1730 1694 1653 1705 848 853 1723 1708 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.26 1.35 1.52 1.36 1.54 1.33 1.51 1.78 1.57 1.58 1.57 1.51 1.51

N 4724 4593 4368 4763 4779 4762 4752 4764 4643 4508 4693 2154 2178 4741 4699 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.30 1.38 1.58 1.38 1.61 1.34 1.56 1.82 1.62 1.65 1.65 1.57 1.58

MATH Central

N 507 500 408 520 518 515 517 514 486 497 508 165 163 514 508 Mean 1.17 1.23 1.47 1.63 1.96 1.60 1.90 1.61 1.86 1.97 1.88 2.05 2.14 1.96 2.05

Northeast

N 213 213 183 214 215 215 211 215 203 201 211 61 64 213 211 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.34 1.32 1.49 1.34 1.59 1.37 1.54 1.73 1.60 1.82 1.78 1.43 1.54

Northwest

N 792 789 663 796 796 787 793 791 739 753 779 173 173 784 784 Mean 1.11 1.20 1.38 1.48 1.80 1.47 1.78 1.44 1.73 1.79 1.60 1.77 1.85 1.79 1.83

Southeast

N 369 366 331 371 371 371 371 370 362 354 365 107 107 368 363 Mean 1.06 1.18 1.30 1.40 1.60 1.39 1.57 1.39 1.58 1.78 1.56 1.63 1.71 1.58 1.59

Southwest

N 1530 1506 1359 1555 1553 1543 1545 1548 1485 1480 1515 462 457 1533 1517

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 14 01/23/2008

Page 39: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.09 1.17 1.30 1.43 1.60 1.42 1.63 1.42 1.59 1.75 1.55 1.73 1.75 1.59 1.65

N 3411 3374 2944 3456 3453 3431 3437 3438 3275 3285 3378 968 964 3412 3383 Mean 1.10 1.19 1.34 1.46 1.69 1.45 1.70 1.45 1.66 1.79 1.61 1.79 1.83 1.68 1.74

MUAP Northwest

N 18 13 18 14 18 18 18 18 18 17 18 6 5 18 18 Mean 1.00 1.15 1.00 1.07 1.11 1.06 1.11 1.06 1.11 1.29 1.11 1.17 1.20 1.11 1.06

Southwest

N 11 9 10 10 12 12 9 12 12 10 8 1 1 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 29 22 28 24 30 30 27 30 30 27 26 7 6 30 30 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.04 1.07 1.03 1.07 1.03 1.07 1.19 1.08 1.14 1.17 1.07 1.03

MUSI Central

N 171 150 161 167 172 171 165 172 169 158 163 55 57 172 172 Mean 1.08 1.28 1.16 1.28 1.29 1.25 1.40 1.23 1.37 1.51 1.34 1.56 1.54 1.35 1.31

Northwest

N 243 206 222 228 249 245 234 248 235 227 233 84 86 243 242 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.18 1.22 1.36 1.23 1.29 1.17 1.35 1.46 1.37 1.45 1.35 1.30 1.34

Southwest

N 89 83 84 89 90 89 90 90 87 85 87 29 29 91 91 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.08 1.29 1.31 1.31 1.43 1.23 1.38 1.62 1.31 1.45 1.48 1.48 1.36

N 503 439 467 484 511 505 489 510 491 470 483 168 172 506 505 Mean 1.06 1.17 1.16 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.36 1.20 1.36 1.51 1.35 1.49 1.44 1.35 1.33

PHED Central

N 75 53 64 75 76 72 76 76 74 74 75 46 44 75 75 Mean 1.05 1.23 1.14 1.20 1.22 1.21 1.39 1.21 1.26 1.53 1.28 1.35 1.52 1.27 1.23

Northwest

N 17 11 15 15 17 16 16 17 15 13 15 10 8 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.07 1.18 1.06 1.25 1.12 1.33 1.31 1.13 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.06

Southwest

N 14 14 13 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 12 12 14 14 Mean 1.00 1.21 1.08 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.07 1.08 1.08 1.07 1.07

N 106 78 92 104 107 102 106 107 103 101 104 68 64 105 105 Mean 1.04 1.22 1.11 1.16 1.20 1.17 1.33 1.18 1.24 1.44 1.23 1.25 1.38 1.21 1.18

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 15 01/23/2008

Page 40: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PHIL Central

N 155 149 147 155 154 154 153 154 144 145 152 32 32 153 150 Mean 1.05 1.28 1.19 1.34 1.59 1.38 1.63 1.23 1.41 1.56 1.43 1.50 1.53 1.54 1.57

Northeast

N 17 15 16 15 17 17 16 17 14 17 16 4 3 17 17 Mean 1.12 1.20 1.19 1.47 1.88 1.53 1.81 1.29 1.50 1.53 1.81 2.50 2.33 2.12 2.24

Northwest

N 188 180 170 180 189 189 184 187 179 178 183 42 41 189 187 Mean 1.10 1.08 1.22 1.43 1.59 1.35 1.63 1.34 1.44 1.74 1.55 1.64 1.66 1.48 1.59

Southeast

N 32 26 29 33 33 33 33 33 32 31 33 9 9 33 33 Mean 1.13 1.46 1.14 1.27 1.18 1.27 1.52 1.30 1.34 1.58 1.36 1.33 1.33 1.18 1.18

Southwest

N 119 103 100 114 118 117 119 120 113 113 114 24 23 116 117 Mean 1.10 1.22 1.19 1.45 1.51 1.38 1.70 1.30 1.35 1.82 1.55 1.92 1.96 1.42 1.46

N 511 473 462 497 511 510 505 511 482 484 498 111 108 508 504 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.56 1.36 1.64 1.29 1.40 1.69 1.51 1.67 1.68 1.49 1.55

PHYS Central

N 111 111 98 113 114 112 111 113 107 109 111 79 79 112 110 Mean 1.21 1.52 1.55 1.86 2.27 1.86 2.22 1.71 2.01 2.00 2.21 2.00 2.14 2.13 2.30

Northwest

N 111 99 98 106 112 112 107 112 105 108 110 92 94 112 108 Mean 1.14 1.29 1.43 1.74 2.22 1.61 2.04 1.58 1.62 1.86 1.87 1.63 1.68 1.90 2.23

Southeast

N 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 33 26 26 33 33 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.31 1.24 1.30 1.21 1.33 1.15 1.21 1.30 1.30 1.19 1.15 1.30 1.33

Southwest

N 153 148 136 151 156 153 154 155 153 154 154 126 125 151 149 Mean 1.07 1.36 1.40 1.42 1.77 1.55 1.90 1.46 1.63 1.65 1.69 1.63 1.60 1.60 1.74

N 408 391 364 403 415 410 405 413 398 404 408 323 324 408 400 Mean 1.13 1.37 1.44 1.61 1.99 1.62 1.98 1.54 1.69 1.77 1.85 1.69 1.72 1.80 2.00

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 16 01/23/2008

Page 41: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PSYC Central

N 506 504 468 509 510 508 505 507 489 472 493 170 164 502 498 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.24 1.42 1.43 1.40 1.66 1.29 1.49 1.80 1.42 1.57 1.63 1.48 1.51

Northeast

N 147 136 141 148 149 149 150 149 148 145 143 58 54 149 150 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.16 1.43 1.37 1.32 1.55 1.23 1.43 1.63 1.53 1.67 1.56 1.40 1.37

Northwest

N 772 764 738 782 780 778 776 775 737 730 759 201 194 768 766 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.17 1.42 1.48 1.41 1.67 1.37 1.46 1.72 1.56 1.74 1.82 1.57 1.50

Southeast

N 314 307 287 317 316 312 312 313 303 290 313 105 105 311 304 Mean 1.05 1.12 1.19 1.27 1.24 1.27 1.43 1.19 1.32 1.67 1.42 1.56 1.61 1.34 1.31

Southwest

N 1012 992 955 1029 1023 1012 1019 1012 994 973 1012 377 359 1015 1004 Mean 1.05 1.09 1.17 1.39 1.36 1.37 1.64 1.28 1.43 1.78 1.53 1.59 1.62 1.43 1.44

N 2751 2703 2589 2785 2778 2759 2762 2756 2671 2610 2720 911 876 2745 2722 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.19 1.39 1.39 1.37 1.62 1.30 1.44 1.75 1.51 1.62 1.66 1.47 1.45

SGNL Coleman

N 68 69 66 70 70 69 70 70 65 69 69 31 35 70 69 Mean 1.10 1.30 1.15 1.44 1.50 1.41 1.71 1.34 1.52 1.72 1.58 1.84 1.71 1.21 1.45

N 68 69 66 70 70 69 70 70 65 69 69 31 35 70 69 Mean 1.10 1.30 1.15 1.44 1.50 1.41 1.71 1.34 1.52 1.72 1.58 1.84 1.71 1.21 1.45

SOCI Central

N 257 257 231 258 258 259 257 258 244 247 257 77 76 258 253 Mean 1.14 1.08 1.28 1.43 1.65 1.49 1.61 1.50 1.58 1.72 1.53 1.82 1.88 1.60 1.72

Northeast

N 148 147 144 146 147 147 147 148 145 142 144 50 48 146 147 Mean 1.11 1.16 1.15 1.36 1.35 1.27 1.46 1.31 1.38 1.82 1.37 1.58 1.58 1.34 1.35

Northwest

N 382 373 351 386 384 382 381 378 369 367 375 118 111 381 381 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.22 1.43 1.62 1.51 1.65 1.44 1.57 1.66 1.54 1.75 1.80 1.48 1.52

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 17 01/23/2008

Page 42: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SOCI Southeast

N 124 123 121 125 125 123 125 125 123 115 118 36 33 122 121 Mean 1.06 1.07 1.18 1.26 1.31 1.30 1.39 1.21 1.40 1.72 1.40 1.75 1.79 1.43 1.40

Southwest

N 484 479 438 485 482 476 476 479 471 452 475 122 118 480 475 Mean 1.15 1.18 1.29 1.55 1.59 1.51 1.84 1.36 1.64 1.88 1.76 1.72 1.82 1.67 1.66

N 1395 1379 1285 1400 1396 1387 1386 1388 1352 1323 1369 403 386 1387 1377 Mean 1.12 1.13 1.24 1.45 1.56 1.46 1.67 1.39 1.56 1.77 1.58 1.73 1.80 1.55 1.58

SPAN Central

N 166 163 157 168 167 167 167 165 156 160 166 73 83 165 165 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.22 1.38 1.44 1.34 1.62 1.32 1.52 1.78 1.46 1.63 1.66 1.41 1.54

Northeast

N 27 27 27 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 26 19 20 28 27 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.18 1.11 1.11 1.21 1.11 1.11 1.44 1.15 1.37 1.25 1.11 1.11

Northwest

N 95 95 92 95 95 94 94 95 89 90 93 48 56 94 95 Mean 1.11 1.09 1.23 1.37 1.59 1.39 1.59 1.29 1.56 1.56 1.40 1.69 1.64 1.49 1.55

Southeast

N 75 75 73 76 76 75 75 76 76 70 75 52 55 76 75 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.07 1.21 1.32 1.16 1.25 1.12 1.32 1.69 1.32 1.50 1.18 1.20 1.11

Southwest

N 175 171 164 173 175 172 174 175 162 169 170 65 76 173 173 Mean 1.06 1.23 1.18 1.28 1.40 1.24 1.48 1.27 1.43 1.62 1.40 1.45 1.33 1.29 1.37

N 538 531 513 540 541 536 538 539 510 516 530 257 290 536 535 Mean 1.08 1.14 1.18 1.31 1.42 1.28 1.50 1.26 1.45 1.66 1.40 1.55 1.45 1.34 1.40

SPCH Central

N 308 305 282 300 313 310 308 312 295 290 305 109 106 310 306 Mean 1.11 1.17 1.20 1.42 1.32 1.38 1.54 1.40 1.43 1.86 1.49 1.56 1.61 1.39 1.49

Northeast

N 123 121 116 122 123 123 122 123 120 114 122 26 25 120 118 Mean 1.04 1.05 1.16 1.25 1.22 1.18 1.34 1.20 1.29 1.54 1.32 1.58 1.72 1.26 1.25

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 18 01/23/2008

Page 43: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SPCH Northwest

N 380 291 327 329 379 375 364 377 358 349 362 103 94 377 373 Mean 1.10 1.35 1.25 1.46 1.31 1.38 1.58 1.42 1.42 1.72 1.54 1.50 1.52 1.29 1.37

Southeast

N 94 92 83 94 95 95 94 95 93 93 94 30 29 95 95 Mean 1.03 1.01 1.11 1.21 1.13 1.15 1.32 1.18 1.29 1.42 1.32 1.77 1.90 1.25 1.19

Southwest

N 341 331 297 342 345 344 345 341 332 316 341 106 102 345 343 Mean 1.04 1.08 1.18 1.41 1.27 1.27 1.54 1.21 1.38 1.63 1.38 1.54 1.58 1.34 1.31

N 1246 1140 1105 1187 1255 1247 1233 1248 1198 1162 1224 374 356 1247 1235 Mean 1.08 1.16 1.20 1.39 1.28 1.31 1.51 1.31 1.39 1.69 1.45 1.55 1.61 1.32 1.36

TECA Northeast

N 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 8 8 9 3 3 9 9 Mean 1.89 1.11 1.78 2.22 3.00 1.63 2.22 2.33 2.38 2.00 2.56 2.33 2.00 2.67 3.33

Northwest

N 86 84 79 86 87 86 87 87 81 80 85 17 16 87 86 Mean 1.10 1.08 1.23 1.51 1.48 1.43 1.72 1.29 1.49 1.65 1.65 1.82 1.94 1.60 1.59

Southeast

N 44 44 42 44 44 44 44 44 44 40 42 21 19 43 42 Mean 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.41 1.23 1.34 1.41 1.16 1.39 1.95 1.52 1.29 1.21 1.35 1.31

Southwest

N 103 100 96 104 103 103 102 103 98 97 100 24 24 103 103 Mean 1.16 1.05 1.20 1.63 1.59 1.54 1.52 1.38 1.61 1.79 1.66 1.54 1.54 1.50 1.65

N 242 237 226 243 243 241 242 243 231 225 236 65 62 242 240 Mean 1.14 1.06 1.21 1.57 1.54 1.47 1.60 1.34 1.55 1.78 1.67 1.57 1.56 1.55 1.63

VIET Central

N 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 7 8 8 Mean 1.25 1.29 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.13 1.25 1.80 1.57 1.13 1.25

N 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 7 8 8 Mean 1.25 1.29 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.13 1.25 1.80 1.57 1.13 1.25

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_ACAD.spo Page 19 01/23/2008

Page 44: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ACCT Central

N 136 135 120 138 137 137 136 135 131 129 132 53 51 137 132 Mean 1.11 1.21 1.37 1.51 1.72 1.54 1.88 1.39 1.66 1.81 1.67 1.81 1.84 1.80 1.86

Northeast

N 24 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 22 24 25 7 7 25 24 Mean 1.38 1.64 2.17 2.32 2.88 2.00 2.32 1.76 2.45 2.29 2.56 1.86 2.14 2.52 3.13

Northwest

N 180 178 163 184 184 183 182 184 173 174 179 41 38 182 183 Mean 1.14 1.35 1.50 1.63 1.81 1.53 1.87 1.42 1.70 1.71 1.63 1.56 1.76 1.62 1.84

Southeast

N 77 77 75 78 78 78 76 78 72 71 73 10 10 76 77 Mean 1.03 1.12 1.20 1.31 1.60 1.28 1.57 1.19 1.43 1.79 1.59 1.70 1.70 1.34 1.48

Southwest

N 353 348 313 357 355 351 351 355 336 347 348 120 122 354 352 Mean 1.11 1.23 1.39 1.54 1.75 1.53 1.84 1.44 1.61 1.76 1.62 1.93 1.96 1.70 1.81

N 770 763 695 782 779 774 770 777 734 745 757 231 228 774 768 Mean 1.12 1.26 1.42 1.55 1.78 1.52 1.84 1.41 1.65 1.78 1.66 1.82 1.89 1.69 1.83

ACNT Central

N 83 80 67 83 83 83 82 82 76 81 82 33 31 83 82 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.46 1.53 1.78 1.54 1.76 1.35 1.71 1.70 1.65 1.76 1.90 1.95 2.02

Northwest

N 142 139 110 138 142 142 140 142 133 134 132 35 36 139 139 Mean 1.23 1.42 1.40 1.71 1.94 1.65 1.93 1.75 1.99 1.71 1.71 1.80 1.83 1.81 2.04

Southeast

N 10 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 4 10 10 Mean 1.30 1.00 1.50 1.44 1.90 1.50 1.60 1.20 1.30 1.90 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.90 2.20

Southwest

N 271 268 245 272 274 273 272 273 265 266 265 101 102 272 268 Mean 1.08 1.19 1.30 1.50 1.68 1.48 1.74 1.37 1.55 1.62 1.59 1.74 1.72 1.60 1.74

N 506 497 432 502 509 508 504 507 484 491 489 173 173 504 499 Mean 1.12 1.25 1.35 1.56 1.77 1.54 1.79 1.47 1.69 1.66 1.64 1.76 1.77 1.72 1.88

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 1 01/23/2008

Page 45: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

AHS Northeast

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 . . 2.00 3.00

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 . . 2.00 3.00

ARCE Northeast

N 8 8 6 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 7 9 9 Mean 1.63 2.50 2.17 1.44 2.00 1.33 1.78 1.22 1.56 1.89 2.00 2.00 1.86 1.89 2.11

N 8 8 6 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 6 7 9 9 Mean 1.63 2.50 2.17 1.44 2.00 1.33 1.78 1.22 1.56 1.89 2.00 2.00 1.86 1.89 2.11

ARTC Southwest

N 212 177 201 185 216 219 213 218 205 200 213 122 131 217 212 Mean 1.08 1.38 1.15 1.59 1.56 1.33 1.51 1.48 1.59 1.71 1.63 1.52 1.50 1.46 1.50

N 212 177 201 185 216 219 213 218 205 200 213 122 131 217 212 Mean 1.08 1.38 1.15 1.59 1.56 1.33 1.51 1.48 1.59 1.71 1.63 1.52 1.50 1.46 1.50

ARTV Southwest

N 55 53 52 51 54 55 52 55 53 52 53 29 30 55 55 Mean 1.04 1.28 1.10 1.51 1.59 1.33 1.69 1.42 1.55 1.52 1.81 1.52 1.40 1.47 1.53

N 55 53 52 51 54 55 52 55 53 52 53 29 30 55 55 Mean 1.04 1.28 1.10 1.51 1.59 1.33 1.69 1.42 1.55 1.52 1.81 1.52 1.40 1.47 1.53

AUMT Northeast

N 103 101 100 105 105 105 105 104 103 101 103 104 104 105 105 Mean 1.04 1.10 1.09 1.41 1.45 1.37 1.53 1.34 1.39 1.67 1.50 1.37 1.36 1.37 1.38

N 103 101 100 105 105 105 105 104 103 101 103 104 104 105 105 Mean 1.04 1.10 1.09 1.41 1.45 1.37 1.53 1.34 1.39 1.67 1.50 1.37 1.36 1.37 1.38

BIOM Central

N 3 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.25 2.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 2.00 2.33 1.50 1.50

N 3 2 2 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.25 2.00 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 2.00 2.33 1.50 1.50

BITC Northeast

N 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.50

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 2 01/23/2008

Page 46: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 1.00 2.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.50

BMGT Central

N 52 50 47 53 52 51 52 51 51 51 52 17 17 53 52 Mean 1.02 1.04 1.19 1.40 1.35 1.37 1.63 1.41 1.61 1.69 1.58 2.06 2.12 1.51 1.54

Northeast

N 27 27 25 27 27 26 27 27 27 27 27 5 5 27 27 Mean 1.07 1.04 1.24 1.70 1.44 1.50 1.96 1.22 1.74 1.63 1.48 1.40 1.40 1.44 1.56

Northwest

N 19 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 18 16 19 7 7 19 19 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.26 1.42 1.32 1.68 1.16 1.44 1.63 1.37 1.71 1.86 1.26 1.37

Southeast

N 24 24 23 24 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 6 4 24 24 Mean 1.33 1.29 1.61 1.46 1.63 1.46 1.79 1.50 1.54 1.74 1.58 1.83 1.75 1.63 2.00

Southwest

N 66 64 64 66 67 68 66 68 67 63 64 26 28 68 68 Mean 1.11 1.22 1.19 1.39 1.36 1.35 1.53 1.40 1.49 1.52 1.38 1.73 1.61 1.35 1.53

N 188 183 177 189 189 188 188 189 187 180 186 61 61 191 190 Mean 1.10 1.13 1.25 1.43 1.41 1.39 1.67 1.37 1.56 1.62 1.47 1.80 1.77 1.43 1.58

BNKG Central

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 10 11 11 10 10 4 4 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.18 1.20 1.36 1.45 1.36 1.90 1.09 1.27 1.20 1.40 2.50 2.50 1.27 1.36

N 11 11 10 11 11 11 10 11 11 10 10 4 4 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.18 1.20 1.36 1.45 1.36 1.90 1.09 1.27 1.20 1.40 2.50 2.50 1.27 1.36

BUSG Central

N 62 50 53 58 62 62 62 59 60 59 60 16 14 61 61 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.19 1.52 1.48 1.50 1.69 1.34 1.62 1.75 1.57 2.13 2.14 1.57 1.57

Northeast

N 31 31 27 32 32 29 32 32 31 30 32 6 5 32 32 Mean 1.16 1.26 1.30 1.63 1.69 1.66 2.00 1.41 1.68 2.13 1.69 1.83 2.00 1.81 1.72

Northwest

N 71 64 60 71 72 71 71 71 69 70 72 16 14 70 72 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.25 1.27 1.26 1.21 1.51 1.14 1.22 1.43 1.33 1.50 1.36 1.16 1.21

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 3 01/23/2008

Page 47: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BUSG Southeast

N 25 24 17 24 25 24 25 25 25 24 24 4 4 25 25 Mean 1.16 1.17 1.35 1.33 1.40 1.38 1.60 1.36 1.48 1.50 1.46 2.25 2.50 1.44 1.52

Southwest

N 79 70 72 74 79 79 79 79 76 78 78 31 32 78 78 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.08 1.39 1.49 1.38 1.67 1.34 1.55 1.71 1.55 1.68 1.56 1.45 1.53

N 268 239 229 259 270 265 269 266 261 261 266 73 69 266 268 Mean 1.07 1.13 1.20 1.41 1.44 1.39 1.67 1.30 1.49 1.67 1.50 1.78 1.72 1.44 1.47

CDEC Central

N 63 63 61 61 63 63 61 63 62 62 63 48 48 63 63 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.03 1.46 1.40 1.32 1.54 1.29 1.35 1.56 1.48 1.58 1.50 1.43 1.41

Northeast

N 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 20 21 21 21 15 16 21 21 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.29 1.14 1.10 1.33 1.10 1.14 2.00 1.29 1.33 1.31 1.05 1.05

Southeast

N 7 6 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 7 2 3 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.29 1.14 1.14 1.29 1.17 1.17 1.50 1.29 2.00 1.33 1.29 1.29

N 91 90 88 89 91 91 89 89 89 89 91 65 67 91 91 Mean 1.02 1.04 1.07 1.40 1.32 1.25 1.47 1.24 1.29 1.66 1.42 1.54 1.45 1.33 1.32

CEC Northwest

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00

System

N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 2 3 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.57 1.43 1.43 1.29 1.29 2.00 1.33 2.00 1.67 1.29 1.43

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 3 4 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.25 1.25 1.86 1.29 1.67 1.50 1.38 1.38

CETT Central

N 65 64 58 66 66 66 63 65 65 62 64 61 62 65 64 Mean 1.06 1.09 1.31 1.32 1.61 1.30 1.59 1.14 1.29 1.45 1.48 1.57 1.35 1.42 1.44

N 65 64 58 66 66 66 63 65 65 62 64 61 62 65 64 Mean 1.06 1.09 1.31 1.32 1.61 1.30 1.59 1.14 1.29 1.45 1.48 1.57 1.35 1.42 1.44

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 4 01/23/2008

Page 48: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CHEF Central

N 275 237 263 273 275 276 273 277 265 272 269 204 203 277 277 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.14 1.40 1.48 1.42 1.57 1.45 1.43 1.56 1.49 1.38 1.40 1.55 1.55

N 275 237 263 273 275 276 273 277 265 272 269 204 203 277 277 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.14 1.40 1.48 1.42 1.57 1.45 1.43 1.56 1.49 1.38 1.40 1.55 1.55

CJLE Northeast

N 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 7 7 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.33 1.13 1.47 1.67 1.53 1.29 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.40

N 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 14 15 7 7 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.33 1.13 1.47 1.67 1.53 1.29 1.60 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.40

CMSW Coleman

N 17 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 4 4 17 17 Mean 1.06 1.00 1.13 1.29 1.12 1.18 1.41 1.06 1.12 1.41 1.29 1.25 1.25 1.06 1.00

N 17 16 16 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 4 4 17 17 Mean 1.06 1.00 1.13 1.29 1.12 1.18 1.41 1.06 1.12 1.41 1.29 1.25 1.25 1.06 1.00

CNBT Central

N 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 Mean 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.25 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.25 1.75

N 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 4 4 Mean 1.25 1.33 1.25 1.75 1.50 1.75 2.25 1.75 1.75 1.75 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.25 1.75

CPMT Central

N 27 26 26 27 27 26 26 27 26 26 26 24 24 26 26 Mean 1.04 1.04 1.23 1.33 1.44 1.15 1.31 1.15 1.19 1.31 1.38 1.29 1.42 1.27 1.38

N 27 26 26 27 27 26 26 27 26 26 26 24 24 26 26 Mean 1.04 1.04 1.23 1.33 1.44 1.15 1.31 1.15 1.19 1.31 1.38 1.29 1.42 1.27 1.38

CSIR Central

N 10 7 11 11 11 11 10 11 10 9 9 6 7 11 11 Mean 1.20 1.57 1.36 1.73 1.73 1.64 1.50 1.64 1.50 1.89 1.22 1.33 1.71 1.82 1.73

N 10 7 11 11 11 11 10 11 10 9 9 6 7 11 11 Mean 1.20 1.57 1.36 1.73 1.73 1.64 1.50 1.64 1.50 1.89 1.22 1.33 1.71 1.82 1.73

CSME Central

N 183 181 181 184 186 186 183 185 185 181 186 177 177 185 184 Mean 1.30 1.20 1.35 1.46 1.79 1.55 1.49 1.51 1.50 1.86 1.51 1.40 1.54 1.52 1.65

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 5 01/23/2008

Page 49: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CSME Northeast

N 82 81 81 82 82 82 82 82 79 82 81 81 81 80 79 Mean 1.04 1.27 1.12 1.28 1.30 1.26 1.30 1.20 1.22 1.41 1.32 1.23 1.27 1.13 1.18

Northwest

N 134 132 130 133 134 135 130 135 133 127 133 119 119 133 132 Mean 1.35 1.30 1.41 1.81 2.21 1.86 1.85 1.73 1.92 2.03 2.15 1.82 1.88 1.88 2.20

Southeast

N 59 57 56 59 60 60 60 60 60 58 59 60 60 60 60 Mean 1.03 1.05 1.07 1.34 1.58 1.22 1.43 1.23 1.37 1.53 1.58 1.25 1.20 1.50 1.48

N 458 451 448 458 462 463 455 462 457 448 459 437 437 458 455 Mean 1.23 1.22 1.29 1.51 1.80 1.54 1.55 1.48 1.56 1.78 1.67 1.46 1.54 1.55 1.70

CTEC Northeast

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 Mean 1.13 1.00 1.13 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.63 1.13 1.25 1.63 1.38 1.60 1.60 1.13 1.13

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 Mean 1.13 1.00 1.13 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.63 1.13 1.25 1.63 1.38 1.60 1.60 1.13 1.13

CTMT Coleman

N 15 13 14 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 16 13 13 16 17 Mean 1.13 1.15 1.00 1.50 1.38 1.31 1.71 1.29 1.47 1.35 1.19 1.31 1.31 1.19 1.71

N 15 13 14 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 16 13 13 16 17 Mean 1.13 1.15 1.00 1.50 1.38 1.31 1.71 1.29 1.47 1.35 1.19 1.31 1.31 1.19 1.71

CVTT Coleman

N 58 55 54 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 56 50 51 56 54 Mean 1.19 1.24 1.28 1.26 1.67 1.44 1.49 1.37 1.39 1.44 1.45 1.36 1.29 1.23 1.50

N 58 55 54 57 57 57 57 57 57 57 56 50 51 56 54 Mean 1.19 1.24 1.28 1.26 1.67 1.44 1.49 1.37 1.39 1.44 1.45 1.36 1.29 1.23 1.50

DAAC Coleman

N 70 72 70 71 72 70 70 72 72 69 71 34 34 72 69 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.06 1.48 1.36 1.36 1.74 1.24 1.35 1.54 1.72 1.47 1.59 1.29 1.29

N 70 72 70 71 72 70 70 72 72 69 71 34 34 72 69 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.06 1.48 1.36 1.36 1.74 1.24 1.35 1.54 1.72 1.47 1.59 1.29 1.29

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 6 01/23/2008

Page 50: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DEMR Northeast

N 49 47 47 51 50 50 50 50 49 48 48 51 49 51 48 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.06 1.20 1.20 1.24 1.32 1.18 1.18 1.33 1.23 1.10 1.18 1.20 1.17

N 49 47 47 51 50 50 50 50 49 48 48 51 49 51 48 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.06 1.20 1.20 1.24 1.32 1.18 1.18 1.33 1.23 1.10 1.18 1.20 1.17

DFTG Northeast

N 140 132 131 143 142 142 143 143 138 137 144 88 98 141 138 Mean 1.06 1.20 1.19 1.43 1.61 1.38 1.58 1.52 1.57 1.69 1.53 1.44 1.46 1.50 1.66

Northwest

N 90 86 82 92 92 93 90 92 84 87 89 52 54 91 92 Mean 1.14 1.24 1.30 1.62 2.00 1.54 1.69 1.78 1.77 1.89 1.80 1.83 1.57 1.81 2.12

Southeast

N 15 14 15 15 15 15 13 14 14 14 14 12 13 15 15 Mean 1.13 1.21 1.33 1.67 1.80 1.53 1.77 1.57 1.71 1.93 1.86 1.83 1.77 1.67 1.80

Southwest

N 82 80 73 82 83 83 81 83 81 81 80 54 56 81 80 Mean 1.17 1.19 1.36 1.59 1.67 1.40 1.57 1.46 1.48 1.69 1.48 1.61 1.66 1.67 1.75

N 327 312 301 332 332 333 327 332 317 319 327 206 221 328 325 Mean 1.12 1.21 1.27 1.53 1.74 1.44 1.61 1.58 1.61 1.76 1.60 1.61 1.56 1.63 1.82

DMSO Coleman

N 109 106 102 106 115 115 113 119 119 112 110 82 78 118 117 Mean 1.28 1.29 1.31 1.60 1.80 1.76 1.96 1.59 1.60 1.79 1.60 1.71 1.79 1.64 1.88

N 109 106 102 106 115 115 113 119 119 112 110 82 78 118 117 Mean 1.28 1.29 1.31 1.60 1.80 1.76 1.96 1.59 1.60 1.79 1.60 1.71 1.79 1.64 1.88

DNTA Coleman

N 69 67 66 69 69 68 69 68 67 67 68 43 41 69 69 Mean 1.06 1.21 1.26 1.57 1.65 1.51 1.72 1.46 1.51 1.66 1.71 1.56 1.68 1.74 1.61

N 69 67 66 69 69 68 69 68 67 67 68 43 41 69 69 Mean 1.06 1.21 1.26 1.57 1.65 1.51 1.72 1.46 1.51 1.66 1.71 1.56 1.68 1.74 1.61

ELPT Central

N 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 11 13 13 13 12 13 13 Mean 1.64 1.23 1.33 1.69 1.77 1.46 1.69 1.46 1.73 1.92 1.38 1.38 1.58 1.62 1.77

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 7 01/23/2008

Page 51: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 11 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 11 13 13 13 12 13 13 Mean 1.64 1.23 1.33 1.69 1.77 1.46 1.69 1.46 1.73 1.92 1.38 1.38 1.58 1.62 1.77

EMSP Coleman

N 28 26 25 31 31 31 31 29 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Mean 1.14 1.15 1.32 1.94 1.94 1.90 2.13 1.48 1.68 1.77 1.87 1.71 1.74 1.90 1.90

N 28 26 25 31 31 31 31 29 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 Mean 1.14 1.15 1.32 1.94 1.94 1.90 2.13 1.48 1.68 1.77 1.87 1.71 1.74 1.90 1.90

ESL Northeast

N 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Mean 2.00 . . 3.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 . .

N 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Mean 2.00 . . 3.00 5.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 5.00 . .

ETWR Southeast

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

FITT Central

N 13 12 11 13 13 13 13 13 11 13 13 12 13 13 13 Mean 1.15 1.25 1.09 1.23 1.31 1.38 1.46 1.38 1.91 1.46 1.38 1.42 1.31 1.23 1.31

N 13 12 11 13 13 13 13 13 11 13 13 12 13 13 13 Mean 1.15 1.25 1.09 1.23 1.31 1.38 1.46 1.38 1.91 1.46 1.38 1.42 1.31 1.23 1.31

FLMC Northwest

N 97 92 90 96 98 98 97 98 92 89 93 63 64 98 97 Mean 1.14 1.24 1.19 1.51 1.60 1.50 1.69 1.26 1.49 1.60 1.63 1.60 1.63 1.42 1.59

N 97 92 90 96 98 98 97 98 92 89 93 63 64 98 97 Mean 1.14 1.24 1.19 1.51 1.60 1.50 1.69 1.26 1.49 1.60 1.63 1.60 1.63 1.42 1.59

FMKT Northwest

N 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 8 9 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.44 1.00 1.22 1.44 1.56 1.44 1.44 1.22 1.43 1.88 1.78 2.00 1.83 1.44 1.44

N 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 8 9 6 6 9 9 Mean 1.44 1.00 1.22 1.44 1.56 1.44 1.44 1.22 1.43 1.88 1.78 2.00 1.83 1.44 1.44

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 8 01/23/2008

Page 52: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

FSHD Central

N 266 205 236 231 267 264 258 265 258 252 259 172 171 266 268 Mean 1.12 1.39 1.19 1.45 1.50 1.34 1.56 1.43 1.43 1.55 1.49 1.45 1.54 1.43 1.53

N 266 205 236 231 267 264 258 265 258 252 259 172 171 266 268 Mean 1.12 1.39 1.19 1.45 1.50 1.34 1.56 1.43 1.43 1.55 1.49 1.45 1.54 1.43 1.53

FSHN Central

N 85 60 61 74 84 85 83 82 79 77 84 40 39 81 84 Mean 1.15 1.10 1.10 1.41 1.49 1.29 1.53 1.27 1.30 1.73 1.55 1.35 1.26 1.36 1.44

N 85 60 61 74 84 85 83 82 79 77 84 40 39 81 84 Mean 1.15 1.10 1.10 1.41 1.49 1.29 1.53 1.27 1.30 1.73 1.55 1.35 1.26 1.36 1.44

GAME Southwest

N 37 37 34 35 37 36 35 37 32 34 35 15 18 36 36 Mean 1.24 1.24 1.29 1.91 1.89 1.75 2.14 1.57 1.69 1.85 2.03 1.80 1.78 1.92 1.83

N 37 37 34 35 37 36 35 37 32 34 35 15 18 36 36 Mean 1.24 1.24 1.29 1.91 1.89 1.75 2.14 1.57 1.69 1.85 2.03 1.80 1.78 1.92 1.83

GISC Southwest

N 26 14 26 25 26 26 26 25 24 26 26 17 18 26 26 Mean 1.08 1.57 1.08 1.52 1.58 1.35 1.85 1.32 1.54 1.62 1.73 1.76 1.50 1.38 1.31

N 26 14 26 25 26 26 26 25 24 26 26 17 18 26 26 Mean 1.08 1.57 1.08 1.52 1.58 1.35 1.85 1.32 1.54 1.62 1.73 1.76 1.50 1.38 1.31

HALT Northwest

N 42 42 36 41 43 43 40 43 42 39 38 22 24 43 43 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.11 1.24 1.23 1.26 1.33 1.19 1.14 1.41 1.21 1.18 1.13 1.35 1.33

N 42 42 36 41 43 43 40 43 42 39 38 22 24 43 43 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.11 1.24 1.23 1.26 1.33 1.19 1.14 1.41 1.21 1.18 1.13 1.35 1.33

HAMG Central

N 68 66 65 69 69 68 67 69 68 64 65 33 30 69 68 Mean 1.04 1.12 1.22 1.33 1.35 1.31 1.46 1.25 1.37 1.36 1.37 1.42 1.43 1.38 1.32

N 68 66 65 69 69 68 67 69 68 64 65 33 30 69 68 Mean 1.04 1.12 1.22 1.33 1.35 1.31 1.46 1.25 1.37 1.36 1.37 1.42 1.43 1.38 1.32

HART Central

N 63 64 60 69 75 68 69 75 75 66 63 74 73 75 74 Mean 1.37 1.52 1.73 2.06 1.81 1.97 2.16 1.67 1.84 2.02 1.95 1.80 2.00 1.91 2.32

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 9 01/23/2008

Page 53: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 63 64 60 69 75 68 69 75 75 66 63 74 73 75 74 Mean 1.37 1.52 1.73 2.06 1.81 1.97 2.16 1.67 1.84 2.02 1.95 1.80 2.00 1.91 2.32

HITT Coleman

N 67 66 64 70 70 69 67 70 69 64 67 39 39 70 69 Mean 1.16 1.15 1.17 1.63 1.71 1.62 1.81 1.53 1.62 2.00 1.97 1.95 2.00 1.70 1.81

N 67 66 64 70 70 69 67 70 69 64 67 39 39 70 69 Mean 1.16 1.15 1.17 1.63 1.71 1.62 1.81 1.53 1.62 2.00 1.97 1.95 2.00 1.70 1.81

HLAB Coleman

N 28 27 25 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 25 22 28 28 Mean 1.07 1.33 1.20 1.61 1.82 1.64 1.61 1.68 1.82 2.18 1.68 1.52 1.55 1.96 2.04

N 28 27 25 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 25 22 28 28 Mean 1.07 1.33 1.20 1.61 1.82 1.64 1.61 1.68 1.82 2.18 1.68 1.52 1.55 1.96 2.04

HPRS Coleman

N 151 149 141 153 153 152 153 153 151 147 149 84 82 153 154 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.16 1.29 1.29 1.26 1.37 1.28 1.40 1.78 1.36 1.54 1.57 1.32 1.31

N 151 149 141 153 153 152 153 153 151 147 149 84 82 153 154 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.16 1.29 1.29 1.26 1.37 1.28 1.40 1.78 1.36 1.54 1.57 1.32 1.31

HRPO Central

N 42 41 40 44 44 44 44 44 42 44 43 14 14 44 44 Mean 1.02 1.02 1.18 1.45 1.34 1.27 1.64 1.25 1.48 1.77 1.42 1.71 1.71 1.45 1.25

Northeast

N 11 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 1 2 11 11 Mean 1.09 1.00 1.10 1.55 1.45 1.55 1.64 1.36 1.40 2.00 1.73 3.00 2.50 1.36 1.36

Northwest

N 39 38 33 39 38 38 39 38 36 36 38 9 7 38 38 Mean 1.08 1.03 1.24 1.23 1.34 1.26 1.46 1.29 1.31 1.42 1.34 1.67 1.86 1.37 1.37

Southwest

N 36 37 34 37 37 37 37 37 36 36 37 7 6 37 37 Mean 1.03 1.03 1.24 1.11 1.03 1.08 1.30 1.00 1.11 1.75 1.19 1.43 1.50 1.19 1.03

N 128 126 117 131 130 130 131 130 124 126 129 31 29 130 130 Mean 1.05 1.02 1.21 1.30 1.26 1.24 1.49 1.20 1.31 1.68 1.36 1.68 1.76 1.35 1.23

IBUS Northwest

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 3 9 9

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 10 01/23/2008

Page 54: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.11 1.33 1.00 1.44 1.56 1.44 1.44 1.00 1.11 1.22 1.22 1.33 1.67 1.22 1.22

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 3 9 9 Mean 1.11 1.33 1.00 1.44 1.56 1.44 1.44 1.00 1.11 1.22 1.22 1.33 1.67 1.22 1.22

IMED Southwest

N 71 59 67 61 71 71 68 71 69 66 67 38 40 71 70 Mean 1.07 1.27 1.16 1.38 1.38 1.31 1.46 1.23 1.45 1.45 1.58 1.53 1.43 1.38 1.37

N 71 59 67 61 71 71 68 71 69 66 67 38 40 71 70 Mean 1.07 1.27 1.16 1.38 1.38 1.31 1.46 1.23 1.45 1.45 1.58 1.53 1.43 1.38 1.37

INDS Central

N 165 142 161 152 169 169 168 168 168 162 168 86 92 168 168 Mean 1.08 1.34 1.18 1.38 1.46 1.36 1.60 1.31 1.34 1.44 1.42 1.62 1.58 1.38 1.47

N 165 142 161 152 169 169 168 168 168 162 168 86 92 168 168 Mean 1.08 1.34 1.18 1.38 1.46 1.36 1.60 1.31 1.34 1.44 1.42 1.62 1.58 1.38 1.47

INMT Central

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Mean 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.70 1.30 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.40

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Mean 1.10 1.30 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.30 1.70 1.30 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.40

ITMT Central

N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 13 15 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.30 1.45 1.30 1.45 1.25 1.35 1.37 1.35 1.31 1.40 1.25 1.20

N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 13 15 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.30 1.45 1.30 1.45 1.25 1.35 1.37 1.35 1.31 1.40 1.25 1.20

ITNW Central

N 18 17 16 18 18 18 18 18 15 17 17 9 11 18 18 Mean 1.11 1.18 1.25 1.39 1.28 1.39 1.61 1.11 1.40 1.24 1.41 1.56 1.73 1.39 1.39

Northwest

N 7 7 7 6 7 7 5 7 6 5 7 4 6 7 7 Mean 1.71 1.71 1.71 2.33 2.29 2.43 2.00 2.00 2.17 2.20 2.43 2.25 2.67 1.71 2.00

Southwest

N 9 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 5 5 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.44 1.44 1.56 1.44 1.33 1.33 1.89 1.44 2.00 2.00 1.33 1.56

N 34 32 31 33 34 34 32 34 30 31 33 18 22 34 34

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 11 01/23/2008

Page 55: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.21 1.25 1.35 1.58 1.53 1.65 1.63 1.35 1.53 1.58 1.64 1.83 2.05 1.44 1.56

ITSC Central

N 34 34 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 33 32 27 29 33 33 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.21 1.44 1.62 1.32 1.50 1.35 1.50 1.70 1.34 1.67 1.41 1.30 1.36

Northeast

N 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 6 6 7 7 Mean 1.29 1.00 1.17 1.57 1.86 1.43 1.71 2.14 1.86 1.67 1.57 2.00 2.00 1.86 2.00

Northwest

N 53 52 47 55 54 55 55 55 54 50 54 29 31 53 52 Mean 1.11 1.12 1.15 1.40 1.63 1.47 1.55 1.44 1.59 1.68 1.61 1.72 1.55 1.64 1.69

Southeast

N 21 21 19 21 21 21 20 21 21 20 20 15 15 21 20 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.21 1.48 1.57 1.43 1.85 1.57 1.81 1.65 1.70 1.53 1.60 1.81 1.90

Southwest

N 77 77 73 78 79 78 76 75 78 75 77 41 45 77 77 Mean 1.10 1.19 1.29 1.40 1.33 1.37 1.49 1.32 1.54 1.64 1.40 1.59 1.42 1.51 1.52

N 192 191 178 195 195 195 192 192 194 184 190 118 126 191 189 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.22 1.42 1.51 1.40 1.55 1.42 1.59 1.66 1.49 1.65 1.50 1.55 1.60

ITSE Central

N 31 29 24 29 32 32 29 32 31 28 32 14 19 32 32 Mean 1.06 1.24 1.13 1.38 1.53 1.44 1.93 1.25 1.58 1.71 1.84 1.64 1.63 1.47 1.56

Northwest

N 20 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 20 12 17 20 20 Mean 1.30 1.47 1.32 1.65 1.90 1.70 2.05 1.55 1.75 2.16 1.75 1.92 2.06 1.70 2.10

Southwest

N 51 46 45 48 51 51 51 50 48 48 50 24 29 49 49 Mean 1.12 1.52 1.18 1.52 1.75 1.47 1.84 1.48 1.67 1.63 1.54 1.67 1.59 1.63 1.65

N 102 94 88 97 103 103 100 102 99 95 102 50 65 101 101 Mean 1.14 1.43 1.19 1.51 1.71 1.50 1.91 1.42 1.66 1.76 1.68 1.72 1.72 1.59 1.71

ITSW Central

N 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 6 7 12 12 Mean 1.08 1.00 1.18 1.67 1.92 1.50 1.58 2.08 2.27 1.75 2.25 1.83 1.86 2.00 2.08

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 12 01/23/2008

Page 56: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ITSW Northwest

N 13 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 13 7 7 13 13 Mean 1.08 1.08 1.25 1.69 2.00 1.85 1.92 1.85 1.92 1.85 2.08 1.71 1.71 1.92 2.00

N 25 24 23 25 25 25 25 25 23 25 25 13 14 25 25 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.22 1.68 1.96 1.68 1.76 1.96 2.09 1.80 2.16 1.77 1.79 1.96 2.04

KORE Northwest

N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.43 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 3.00 3.00 1.14 1.14

N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 1 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.43 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 1.14 3.00 3.00 1.14 1.14

LGLA Central

N 158 156 126 154 159 154 145 157 150 139 146 51 49 156 158 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.24 1.32 1.38 1.38 1.50 1.25 1.44 1.54 1.71 1.63 1.63 1.46 1.43

N 158 156 126 154 159 154 145 157 150 139 146 51 49 156 158 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.24 1.32 1.38 1.38 1.50 1.25 1.44 1.54 1.71 1.63 1.63 1.46 1.43

MCHN Central

N 149 145 146 150 151 153 152 153 153 151 149 152 151 153 152 Mean 1.03 1.12 1.24 1.37 1.33 1.35 1.33 1.35 1.30 1.55 1.33 1.15 1.19 1.38 1.38

N 149 145 146 150 151 153 152 153 153 151 149 152 151 153 152 Mean 1.03 1.12 1.24 1.37 1.33 1.35 1.33 1.35 1.30 1.55 1.33 1.15 1.19 1.38 1.38

MDCA Central

N 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 13 14 25 25 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.33 1.32 1.36 1.32 1.36 1.40 1.44 1.96 1.33 1.69 1.71 1.44 1.48

Coleman

N 86 81 77 87 89 89 86 88 88 87 85 69 69 89 89 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.21 1.53 1.61 1.62 1.79 1.47 1.53 1.75 1.61 1.46 1.52 1.42 1.53

Northeast

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 2 1 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.20 1.00 1.00 2.25 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.20

Southwest

N 28 29 25 26 28 28 28 27 28 27 27 13 14 26 28 Mean 1.14 1.21 1.48 1.65 2.14 1.64 1.82 1.48 2.11 2.15 2.00 2.38 2.29 2.42 2.43

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 13 01/23/2008

Page 57: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 144 140 131 143 147 147 144 145 146 142 140 97 98 145 147 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.27 1.50 1.65 1.56 1.70 1.44 1.61 1.87 1.64 1.61 1.65 1.59 1.68

MLAB Coleman

N 106 107 105 108 109 109 109 108 109 108 108 94 94 110 110 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.04 1.24 1.19 1.18 1.26 1.20 1.18 1.52 1.33 1.13 1.18 1.25 1.22

N 106 107 105 108 109 109 109 108 109 108 108 94 94 110 110 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.04 1.24 1.19 1.18 1.26 1.20 1.18 1.52 1.33 1.13 1.18 1.25 1.22

MRKG Northwest

N 25 25 20 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 25 4 4 25 25 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.50 1.44 1.60 1.32 1.92 1.24 1.42 1.79 1.40 2.25 2.75 1.36 1.64

N 25 25 20 25 25 25 25 25 24 24 25 4 4 25 25 Mean 1.08 1.04 1.50 1.44 1.60 1.32 1.92 1.24 1.42 1.79 1.40 2.25 2.75 1.36 1.64

MUSB Northeast

N 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 1 1 5 5 Mean 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.20 1.60 1.33 1.40 2.00 2.00 1.40 1.40

Northwest

N 29 29 27 30 30 30 30 30 25 27 30 7 7 29 27 Mean 1.21 1.00 1.26 1.37 1.60 1.60 1.53 1.23 1.44 1.44 1.60 1.86 1.86 1.52 1.74

N 33 34 32 35 35 35 35 35 30 30 35 8 8 34 32 Mean 1.21 1.03 1.25 1.37 1.57 1.57 1.51 1.23 1.47 1.43 1.57 1.88 1.88 1.50 1.69

MUSC Northwest

N 112 93 106 111 112 112 110 110 103 105 109 88 93 111 106 Mean 1.02 1.20 1.20 1.32 1.39 1.29 1.60 1.26 1.48 1.70 1.83 1.47 1.52 1.38 1.42

N 112 93 106 111 112 112 110 110 103 105 109 88 93 111 106 Mean 1.02 1.20 1.20 1.32 1.39 1.29 1.60 1.26 1.48 1.70 1.83 1.47 1.52 1.38 1.42

MUSP Northwest

N 34 24 31 22 34 32 26 34 32 25 27 14 14 34 33 Mean 1.06 1.33 1.10 1.27 1.32 1.28 1.31 1.21 1.19 1.20 1.44 1.64 1.64 1.24 1.24

N 34 24 31 22 34 32 26 34 32 25 27 14 14 34 33 Mean 1.06 1.33 1.10 1.27 1.32 1.28 1.31 1.21 1.19 1.20 1.44 1.64 1.64 1.24 1.24

NMTT Coleman

N 142 133 135 143 143 140 141 140 143 140 139 101 101 143 143 Mean 1.19 1.44 1.21 1.64 1.78 1.59 1.70 1.51 1.62 1.84 1.53 1.51 1.56 1.59 1.71

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 14 01/23/2008

Page 58: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 142 133 135 143 143 140 141 140 143 140 139 101 101 143 143 Mean 1.19 1.44 1.21 1.64 1.78 1.59 1.70 1.51 1.62 1.84 1.53 1.51 1.56 1.59 1.71

OTHA Coleman

N 51 51 51 53 53 53 53 53 52 53 52 47 48 53 52 Mean 1.43 1.35 1.12 1.75 1.92 1.77 1.92 1.68 1.71 2.02 2.02 1.83 1.85 1.79 2.08

N 51 51 51 53 53 53 53 53 52 53 52 47 48 53 52 Mean 1.43 1.35 1.12 1.75 1.92 1.77 1.92 1.68 1.71 2.02 2.02 1.83 1.85 1.79 2.08

PBAD Northeast

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.50 1.50 1.20 1.20

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.50 1.50 1.20 1.20

PHRA Coleman

N 164 160 159 172 177 172 170 174 174 167 168 137 132 175 171 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.15 1.59 1.70 1.61 1.60 1.59 1.55 1.66 1.64 1.59 1.59 1.74 1.77

N 164 160 159 172 177 172 170 174 174 167 168 137 132 175 171 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.15 1.59 1.70 1.61 1.60 1.59 1.55 1.66 1.64 1.59 1.59 1.74 1.77

PHTC Southwest

N 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00

N 6 5 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00

POFI Central

N 54 54 52 53 54 54 54 54 53 51 52 41 41 54 53 Mean 1.11 1.13 1.25 1.34 1.31 1.35 1.41 1.30 1.32 1.51 1.42 1.54 1.46 1.41 1.32

Northeast

N 26 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 26 18 18 26 26 Mean 1.12 1.16 1.12 1.42 1.42 1.31 1.35 1.27 1.31 1.81 1.46 1.28 1.28 1.42 1.46

Northwest

N 28 27 26 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 17 16 29 29 Mean 1.00 1.15 1.08 1.24 1.31 1.38 1.41 1.24 1.38 1.69 1.41 1.41 1.31 1.31 1.28

Southeast

N 48 49 43 50 50 49 47 49 49 49 49 34 34 50 50

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 15 01/23/2008

Page 59: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.04 1.12 1.33 1.74 1.62 1.41 1.53 1.55 1.57 1.98 1.69 1.74 1.71 1.78 1.68

POFI Southwest

N 68 67 60 68 68 68 68 68 65 65 68 43 44 68 67 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.37 1.40 1.59 1.40 1.43 1.31 1.42 1.74 1.43 1.84 1.77 1.54 1.54

N 224 222 206 226 227 226 224 226 222 220 224 153 153 227 225 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.26 1.44 1.48 1.38 1.43 1.35 1.41 1.74 1.49 1.62 1.57 1.52 1.48

POFM Southeast

N 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 2 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.38 1.38 1.63 1.50 1.75 1.50 2.00 1.50 1.25

Southwest

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 6 6 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.25 1.13 1.00 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.83 2.17 1.38 1.25

N 16 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 8 8 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.19 1.13 1.25 1.25 1.19 1.44 1.31 1.44 1.75 2.13 1.44 1.25

POFT Central

N 68 50 60 63 68 68 66 67 67 63 66 28 28 68 68 Mean 1.03 1.14 1.08 1.38 1.50 1.31 1.53 1.45 1.54 1.54 1.56 1.86 1.79 1.32 1.49

Northeast

N 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 3 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.50 1.33 1.00 1.67 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.00 2.00 2.50 1.50 1.67

Northwest

N 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 4 3 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.50 1.67 1.50 1.50 1.33

Southeast

N 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 17 17 21 21 Mean 1.10 1.05 1.19 1.57 1.52 1.43 1.62 1.29 1.29 2.05 1.67 1.53 1.53 1.38 1.52

Southwest

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 9 10 3 4 7 7 Mean 1.10 1.10 1.50 1.50 1.80 1.60 1.60 1.60 1.80 2.00 1.70 2.00 2.00 1.57 1.86

N 107 87 97 102 105 105 103 104 104 99 102 54 53 104 102 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.44 1.52 1.35 1.55 1.41 1.50 1.68 1.58 1.76 1.74 1.37 1.52

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 16 01/23/2008

Page 60: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PSTR Central

N 97 85 91 81 98 96 90 96 94 83 79 91 91 97 97 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.09 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.21 1.18 1.23 1.30 1.19 1.15 1.14 1.18 1.11

N 97 85 91 81 98 96 90 96 94 83 79 91 91 97 97 Mean 1.04 1.09 1.09 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.21 1.18 1.23 1.30 1.19 1.15 1.14 1.18 1.11

PTAC Northeast

N 46 46 45 45 47 47 44 47 46 44 46 27 28 46 45 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.13 1.47 1.36 1.38 1.50 1.19 1.33 1.77 1.52 1.33 1.25 1.35 1.36

N 46 46 45 45 47 47 44 47 46 44 46 27 28 46 45 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.13 1.47 1.36 1.38 1.50 1.19 1.33 1.77 1.52 1.33 1.25 1.35 1.36

PTHA Coleman

N 154 146 148 153 152 153 151 152 153 147 153 138 140 154 153 Mean 1.05 1.23 1.11 1.40 1.52 1.49 1.62 1.62 1.56 1.72 1.54 1.40 1.38 1.45 1.56

N 154 146 148 153 152 153 151 152 153 147 153 138 140 154 153 Mean 1.05 1.23 1.11 1.40 1.52 1.49 1.62 1.62 1.56 1.72 1.54 1.40 1.38 1.45 1.56

RADR Coleman

N 395 365 364 402 403 388 402 399 390 395 399 263 245 411 412 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.18 1.57 1.53 1.46 1.73 1.57 1.69 1.73 1.69 1.41 1.42 1.67 1.76

N 395 365 364 402 403 388 402 399 390 395 399 263 245 411 412 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.18 1.57 1.53 1.46 1.73 1.57 1.69 1.73 1.69 1.41 1.42 1.67 1.76

RELE Southeast

N 19 13 15 18 19 18 19 19 19 16 17 5 5 19 19 Mean 1.00 1.31 1.07 1.22 1.11 1.17 1.26 1.11 1.21 1.44 1.29 1.40 1.60 1.11 1.11

Southwest

N 80 63 77 66 79 77 69 79 79 61 64 31 31 78 79 Mean 1.01 1.06 1.08 1.14 1.13 1.12 1.30 1.08 1.15 1.28 1.14 1.16 1.19 1.15 1.15

N 99 76 92 84 98 95 88 98 98 77 81 36 36 97 98 Mean 1.01 1.11 1.08 1.15 1.12 1.13 1.30 1.08 1.16 1.31 1.17 1.19 1.25 1.14 1.14

RNSG Coleman

N 1024 998 973 968 1056 1024 1008 1053 1002 961 965 679 664 1026 1026 Mean 1.13 1.14 1.25 1.65 1.74 1.62 1.86 1.64 1.66 1.72 1.74 1.58 1.59 1.67 1.81

N 1024 998 973 968 1056 1024 1008 1053 1002 961 965 679 664 1026 1026 Mean 1.13 1.14 1.25 1.65 1.74 1.62 1.86 1.64 1.66 1.72 1.74 1.58 1.59 1.67 1.81

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 17 01/23/2008

Page 61: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

RSPT Coleman

N 173 170 153 183 184 179 181 182 182 181 180 127 125 182 181 Mean 1.14 1.23 1.25 1.43 1.52 1.50 1.61 1.34 1.38 1.53 1.36 1.35 1.38 1.43 1.45

N 173 170 153 183 184 179 181 182 182 181 180 127 125 182 181 Mean 1.14 1.23 1.25 1.43 1.52 1.50 1.61 1.34 1.38 1.53 1.36 1.35 1.38 1.43 1.45

RSTO Central

N 92 88 87 89 93 90 91 93 90 89 88 40 36 92 93 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.08 1.19 1.15 1.26 1.42 1.14 1.26 1.48 1.31 1.30 1.31 1.24 1.14

N 92 88 87 89 93 90 91 93 90 89 88 40 36 92 93 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.08 1.19 1.15 1.26 1.42 1.14 1.26 1.48 1.31 1.30 1.31 1.24 1.14

RTVB Northwest

N 117 101 109 116 117 117 116 117 113 110 116 87 85 118 116 Mean 1.10 1.38 1.14 1.41 1.55 1.34 1.58 1.24 1.47 1.66 1.46 1.49 1.51 1.45 1.59

Southwest

N 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 28 29 30 20 20 30 30 Mean 1.10 1.00 1.20 1.30 1.67 1.33 1.87 1.47 1.50 1.69 1.63 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.43

N 147 131 139 146 147 147 146 147 141 139 146 107 105 148 146 Mean 1.10 1.29 1.15 1.38 1.57 1.34 1.64 1.29 1.48 1.67 1.49 1.51 1.52 1.46 1.55

SCIT Coleman

N 28 28 27 29 29 29 29 29 28 29 28 7 8 29 28 Mean 1.11 1.25 1.48 2.00 2.48 1.79 1.90 1.41 1.71 1.90 1.96 2.14 2.50 2.03 2.43

Northeast

N 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 14 15 7 9 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.13 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.20 1.14 1.00 1.19 1.06

N 44 44 43 45 45 45 45 45 44 43 43 14 17 45 44 Mean 1.07 1.16 1.30 1.71 2.00 1.51 1.73 1.27 1.45 1.63 1.70 1.64 1.71 1.73 1.93

SLNG Coleman

N 86 65 83 86 87 85 84 87 84 83 84 25 25 86 81 Mean 1.17 1.38 1.12 1.67 1.56 1.53 1.87 1.43 1.61 1.81 1.62 1.92 2.04 1.50 1.53

N 86 65 83 86 87 85 84 87 84 83 84 25 25 86 81 Mean 1.17 1.38 1.12 1.67 1.56 1.53 1.87 1.43 1.61 1.81 1.62 1.92 2.04 1.50 1.53

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 18 01/23/2008

Page 62: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2007 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SRGT Coleman

N 177 169 166 189 198 190 193 199 191 189 188 172 165 198 196 Mean 1.12 1.21 1.21 1.56 1.66 1.51 1.69 1.52 1.57 1.85 1.63 1.40 1.48 1.52 1.71

N 177 169 166 189 198 190 193 199 191 189 188 172 165 198 196 Mean 1.12 1.21 1.21 1.56 1.66 1.51 1.69 1.52 1.57 1.85 1.63 1.40 1.48 1.52 1.71

TRVM Central

N 10 9 9 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 2 2 11 10 Mean 1.10 1.00 1.44 1.64 1.82 1.55 1.55 1.20 1.40 1.82 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 1.70

N 10 9 9 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 2 2 11 10 Mean 1.10 1.00 1.44 1.64 1.82 1.55 1.55 1.20 1.40 1.82 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 1.70

VNSG Coleman

N 472 457 450 479 485 478 481 479 481 462 469 302 294 476 471 Mean 1.10 1.22 1.22 1.54 1.58 1.50 1.68 1.45 1.46 1.66 1.51 1.47 1.47 1.51 1.65

N 472 457 450 479 485 478 481 479 481 462 469 302 294 476 471 Mean 1.10 1.22 1.22 1.54 1.58 1.50 1.68 1.45 1.46 1.66 1.51 1.47 1.47 1.51 1.65

VTHT Northwest

N 45 44 45 44 45 45 45 45 44 42 44 39 38 45 44 Mean 1.13 1.05 1.04 1.09 1.13 1.09 1.60 1.07 1.16 1.26 1.27 1.26 1.18 1.29 1.14

N 45 44 45 44 45 45 45 45 44 42 44 39 38 45 44 Mean 1.13 1.05 1.04 1.09 1.13 1.09 1.60 1.07 1.16 1.26 1.27 1.26 1.18 1.29 1.14

Houston Community College Office of Institutional Research

TP: SEOI_FALL2007_WFC.spo Page 19 01/23/2008

Page 63: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System SEOI – Instructor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

INSTRUCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Specify an individual and location for the student proctor to return completed surveys, usually a department or campus office. 2. Recruit a student proctor to conduct the survey. Review with the student proctor their directions as the proctor (see Student Proctor's Directions). 3. Give the survey packet to the student proctor. Inform the student proctor about the return

of the surveys (name of individual and location). In order to ensure proper handling of SEOI forms, be sure to give the student proctor the envelope in which the survey materials were received. This is the return envelope.

4. Write your name and the Class number (not the course number) on the blackboard.

Explain to your students that the purpose of this survey is to improve certain aspects of the course and to help you improve the way you teach. Please be sure to explain that the survey is anonymous. Under no circumstances will the instructor know the student’s identity. Introduce the student proctor to the class.

5. Leave the room and do not return until the students have completed and turned in their surveys to the student proctor. The proctor is responsible for turning the materials in. Please make sure the student proctor understands where to turn in the survey packet.

If you have any questions regarding these directions please call 713-718-6259

Page 64: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System SEOI – Proctor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

STUDENT PROCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Make sure that the Class number that the instructor wrote on the board matches the class

number on the survey packet. After the instructor has left the room, pass out both sheets of the Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) survey. Keep any extra forms in your possession.

2. Read “Statement of Intent” to the students:

This survey instrument has been designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of your instructor and your perceptions of the effectiveness of the class instruction. Please give us your serious and fair evaluation of both your and class instruction.

3. Read the following instructions to the students:

• Use only a #2 pencil or a blue or black ink pen. • Write the instructor’s name and bubble in the Class number in the upper

right corner of the Questionnaire and the Written Comments sheet, if used. (Check to see that this is being done properly.)

• Fill out the Questionnaire independently, without consultation with other students. • Do not sign your name or leave any marks of identification on the answer sheet. • If this is a lecture class, you do not need to complete Section III. If this is a lab, clinical, workshop or practicum class complete all sections. • Written comments are optional but very much encouraged.

4. When students have completed the survey, collect the forms, place them face up in the

same direction, and place both completed and unused forms into the original envelope and close it.

5. Return the envelope (containing all forms) to the location and individual specified by

your instructor. (This is most likely the department or campus secretary) Do not return the forms to the instructor.

Page 65: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Click here to view the SEOI Survey Instrument.

Page 66: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

INFORMATION SHEET - STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION (SEOI) PROGRAM

HOW TO READ THE INDIVIDUAL INSTRUCTOR REPORT

Your individual evaluation report contains the following information: • Name, Class Number (CRN), Course Title, Course Number • Question identification numbers (Q01 – Q15) appear across the top of the evaluation report. The

numbers correspond with the items on the standard questionnaire forms. • TOTAL - The "TOTAL " row shown reflects the total number of students in a specific course who

responded to each item. The numbers underneath "TOTAL" correspond to the items on the answer scale for the standard questionnaire.

Values for the answer scale to Questions 01-03: 1 = YES 2 = NEUTRAL 3 = NO 4 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

Values for the answer scale to Questions 04-15: 1 = STRONGLY AGREE 2 = AGREE 3 = NEUTRAL 4 = DISAGREE 5 = STRONGLY DISAGREE 6 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

• MEAN - Averaged scores for each questionnaire item per individual class. At the bottom of the last page for each report, you will find cumulative statistics which provide the following information: • TOT. FREQ (total frequency) - Indicates the cumulative sum of students from your combined classes who

responded to each item. • TOTAL MEAN - Indicates combined mean scores for each questionnaire item for all your classes. • SYST MEAN – Indicates the combined mean scores on each questionnaire item for your discipline across the

entire college system. NOTE: If you taught more than one course during the semester, the data for those courses appear on the printout under the respective course numbers. Now, go to the next page for an illustration of how to read your report.

Page 67: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2007 Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor Question

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM STUDENT EVALUATION REPORT - BY INSTRUCTOR

NAME CRN Q01 Q02 Q03 Q4 ……. Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 DOE, J. M. 54321 ABCD 2301 TOTAL 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.25 1.25 1.12 0 0 0 TOT. FREQ 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.12 1.87 ……. 1.12 0 0 0 SYST MEAN 1.85 1.20 1.19 1.85 1.17 0 0 0

FOR QUESTIONS 01 - 03: Look at the TOTAL Now look under the column Q01: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

one. • Three students answered "Yes" to Question 1. • Three students answered "Neutral" to Question 1. • Two students answered "No" to Question 1. • None of the students answered "No Basis for

Judgement" to Question 1. There are four possible answers to Q1-Q3, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

FOR QUESTIONS 04 - 15: Look at the TOTAL.

Now look under the column Q04: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

four. • Three students answered "Strongly Agree" to

Question 4. • Three students answered "Agree" to Question 4. • Two students answered "Neutral" to Question 4 • None of the students answered "Disagree",

"Strongly Disagree", or "No Basis for Judgement" to Question 4. There are six possible answers to Q4-Q15, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

Look at the TOT. FREQ row that (number of responses). Now look under column Q01: • The total number of responses for all classes taught by the instructor is eight. In the example, the number for the

cumulative statistic is the same because the instructor only taught one class. For an instructor who taught more than one class, the cumulative statistics would reflect the total responses received from all students taught during the semester.

The System mean is the cumulative average for all instructors from the appropriate teaching area who participated in the program during the semester. These figures provide comparative performance information.