Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration:...

68
Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) FALL 2005 Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research March 3, 2006

Transcript of Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration:...

Page 1: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Results of

Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI)

FALL 2005

Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research March 3, 2006

Page 2: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Fall 2005 Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction

Table of Contents Executive Summary Overview Analysis of SEOI Questions Full-Time/Part-Time Academic Instructors ……………… Tab 1 Full-Time/Part-Time Workforce Instructors ……………... Tab 2 Learning Resources Results………………………………………... Tab 3 Means Reports Academic ………………………………………………………. Tab 4 Workforce ……………………………………………………… Tab 5 Appendices ……………………………………………………………. Tab 6 Instructor and Student Proctor Directions SEOI Survey How to Read the Individual Instructor Report Please assist us by sharing all or parts of this document with colleagues who might find it useful. You may contact Dr. Linda Gibbs, Director (713-718-8627),or Ray Golitko (713-718-8629) if you have any questions or comments on this material.

GB: ToC.doc Prepared 3/21/2006

Page 3: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and part-time faculty. Approximately 95,279 surveys were sent out in 4,831 envelopes; 57,373 surveys were returned to the Office of Institutional Research. The return rate for the paper surveys was 60% including late submissions. Instructors’ reports were provided to academic and workforce deans on December 9, 2005, on CD ROM. Four thousand nine hundred and sixty forms arrived late and were processed in February, 2006. The instructors’ reports were sent to deans for distribution. Methods Used: The optical-scan survey instrument was created using ScanTools for Windows, by National Computer Systems. The scanned data were analyzed by OIR using SPSS 13.0, and individual instructor reports were prepared. Also provided to students with the questionnaires were student comment sheets, which were later returned in their original hand-written form to the instructors via their respective deans’ offices. Library data were analyzed by subject and location and provided to library chairs for their use.

Page 4: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Overview of SEOI Responses, Fall 2005

In the responses discussed below, respondents who neither agreed nor disagreed, indicated that they were ‘neutral’, ‘had no basis for judgment’ or simply did not respond to the question. In Part I, Evaluation of Instruction:

• The course requirements in the syllabus were clearly stated; 91.1 of students agreed and 1.6% disagreed.

• The textbook used for this course is suitable; 84.8% of respondents agreed while 3.3% disagreed.

• Other instructional materials (tapes, handouts, web sites, etc.) used in this course enhanced my learning of the subject matter; 77.9.% of respondents agreed, and 4.9% disagreed.

In Part II, Evaluation of Instructor:

• The instructor asks test questions that deal with material that is covered in the course; 91.8% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.5% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor communicates clearly; 88.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The assignments were relevant to the course; 93.0% agreed or strongly agreed, and 1.5% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• My grades are an indication of learning; 83.9% agreed or strongly agreed, and 4.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor treats students with respect; 93.6% agreed or strongly agreed, and 1.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor is available for student consultation; 88.4% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor grades impartially; 81.4% agreed or strongly agreed, and 6.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor gives me timely feedback on graded work; 86.7% agreed or strongly agreed, and 3.6% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part III, Lab Evaluation: In the section below, students who indicated an opinion are calculated in the agreement/disagreement percentages; those who indicated ‘no basis for judgment’ or did not respond were assumed not to be enrolled in laboratory or clinical courses.

• The instructor explains appropriate safety procedures for this laboratory/clinical; 85.8% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• The instructor links the laboratory exercises to lecture; 84.5% agreed or strongly agreed, and 2.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

In Part IV, Overall Evaluation:

• The instructor encourages me to become actively engaged in the learning process; 88.1% agreed or strongly agreed, and 3.1% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

• I would recommend this instructor to other students; 85.3% agreed or strongly agreed, and 5.4% disagreed or strongly disagreed.

Page 5: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

1.47.1

91.5

1.97.7

90.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=41069) Neutral (n=3330) No (n=723)

Responses (Total=45,122)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

85.4

2.811.8

3.512.0

84.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=37317) Neutral (n=5226) No (n=1368)

Responses (Total=43,911)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q1&2.xls Prepared:3/21/2006

Page 6: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

78.4

17.34.4

18.66.0

75.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=31978) Neutral (n=7436) No (n=2127)Responses (Total=41,541)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q3.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 7: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

1.4

64.7

27.8

5.4 0.7

63.0

27.9

6.12.0 1.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=28897)

Agree(n=12597)

Neutral(n=2590)

Disagree(n=769)

StronglyDisagree(n=374)Responses (Total=45,227)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

2.77.0

25.2

63.9

1.2 1.83.58.4

26.2

60.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=28489)

Agree(n=11782)

Neutral(n=3519)

Disagree(n=1413)

StronglyDisagree(n=690)Responses (Total=45,893)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q4&5.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 8: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

5.3

28.2

65.2

0.50.8 0.71.25.9

28.9

63.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=29261)

Agree(n=12963)

Neutral(n=2538)

Disagree(n=459)

StronglyDisagree(n=266)

Responses (Total=45,487)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

1.33.4

11.4

29.7

54.2

1.43.7

11.8

30.0

53.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=24270)

Agree(n=13499)

Neutral(n=5236)

Disagree(n=1614)

StronglyDisagree(n=608)Responses (Total=45,227)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q6&7.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 9: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

0.8

62.0

26.1

9.7 1.4 0.7

60.2

27.2 10.0

1.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=26930)

Agree(n=11731)

Neutral(n=4336)

Disagree(n=701)

StronglyDisagree(n=314)Responses (Total=44,012)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

0.80.61.14.5

22.4

71.3

1.14.6

22.2

71.3

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=32552)

Agree(n=10192)

Neutral(n=2091)

Disagree(n=518)

StronglyDisagree(n=314)Responses (Total=45,667)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q8&9.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 10: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

1.0

58.4

27.9

10.22.4

57.4

28.7

10.02.8 1.1

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=25939)

Agree(n=12674)

Neutral(n=4508)

Disagree(n=1167)

StronglyDisagree(n=474)Responses (Total=44,762)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

55.5

25.1 12.34.5 2.5 2.74.7

54.2

26.012.4

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=23898)

Agree(n=11106)

Neutral(n=5385)

Disagree(n=2003)

StronglyDisagree(n=1123)Responses (Total=43,515)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q10&11.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 11: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

0.6

58.4

26.912.6

1.5

55.6

28.1

13.3

1.9 1.10.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=11060)

Agree (n=5324) Neutral(n=2517)

Disagree(n=334)

StronglyDisagree(n=161)Responses (Total=19,396)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

1.30.71.8

13.3

27.2

56.9

2.6

14.428.1

53.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=10647)

Agree (n=5310) Neutral(n=2661)

Disagree(n=418)

StronglyDisagree(n=186)

Responses (Total=19,222)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q12&13.xls Prepared: 3/21/2006

Page 12: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Academic - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in the Learning Process

0.92.09.0

27.4

60.7 59.3

1.22.39.5

27.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=27303)

Agree(n=12534)

Neutral(n=4188)

Disagree(n=991)

StronglyDisagree(n=469)Responses (Total=45,485)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

2.52.69.222.4

63.4

3.23.09.923.1

60.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=28138)

Agree(n=10289)

Neutral(n=4304)

Disagree(n=1252)

StronglyDisagree(n=1282)Responses (Total=45,265)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_Acad, Acad_FTPT_Q14&15.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 13: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 1: The Course Requirements in the Syllabus Were Clearly Stated

1.26.6

92.3

2.28.0

89.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

120.0

Yes (n=9611) Neutral (n=737) No (n=155)Responses (Total=10,503)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 2: The Textbook Used For This Course is Suitable

10.94.6

84.5 83.1

13.43.5

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=8420) Neutral (n=1167) No (n=426)

Responses (Total=10,013)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q1&2.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 14: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part I: Evaluation of Instruction

Question 3: Other Instructional Materials (Tapes, Handouts, Web Sites, etc.) Used in This Course Enhanced My Learning of the Subject Matter

83.5

13.03.6

18.2

4.9

76.9

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Yes (n=8054) Neutral (n=1439) No (n=393)Responses (Total=9,886)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q3.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 15: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 4: The Instructor Asks Test Questions That Deal With Material That is Covered in the Course

1.4

65.4

27.3

5.20.7

60.7

30.2

6.0 2.1 1.00.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6699)

Agree(n=2955)

Neutral(n=574)

Disagree(n=169)

StronglyDisagree(n=83)Responses (Total=10,480)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 5: The Instructor Communicates Clearly

1.1

65.0

26.0

5.92.0

57.5

28.88.5

3.4 1.80.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6721)

Agree(n=2878)

Neutral(n=717)

Disagree(n=261)

StronglyDisagree(n=141)

Responses (Total=10,718)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q4&5.xls Prepared:3/21/2006

Page 16: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 6: The Assignments Were Relevant to the Course

4.3

27.1

67.5

0.40.7 0.61.06.0

30.6

61.7

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6986)

Agree(n=3002)

Neutral(n=514)

Disagree(n=86)

StronglyDisagree(n=50)Responses (Total=10,638)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 7: My Grades Are an Indication of My Learning

57.8

28.6

8.73.6 1.3

53.2

31.8

10.43.0 1.6

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=5936)

Agree(n=3113)

Neutral(n=967)

Disagree(n=363)

StronglyDisagree(n=149)Responses (Total=10,528)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q6&7.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 17: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 9: The Instructor is Available For Student Consultation

65.3

26.3

6.41.4 0.7 1.0

59.5

28.8

8.91.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6626)

Agree(n=2823)

Neutral(n=746)

Disagree(n=158)

StronglyDisagree(n=79)Responses (Total=10,432)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 8: The Instructor Treats Students With Respect

0.81.34.522.3

71.1

0.81.34.3

23.8

69.8

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=7556)

Agree(n=2433)

Neutral(n=474)

Disagree(n=143)

StronglyDisagree(n=87)Responses (Total=10,693)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q8&9.xls Prepared: 3/24/2006

Page 18: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 2: Evaluation of Instructor

Question 11: The Instructor Gives Me Timely Feedback on Graded Work

0.9

62.2

26.98.0

2.0

56.9

30.6

8.5

2.6 1.40.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6303)

Agree(n=2924)

Neutral(n=845)

Disagree(n=228)

StronglyDisagree(n=113)Responses (Total=10,413)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 10: The Instructor Grades Impartially

60.9

25.2

8.43.4 2.1 2.33.7

55.528.5

10.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6083)

Agree(n=2693)

Neutral(n=915)

Disagree(n=359)

StronglyDisagree(n=221)Responses (Total=10,271)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q10&11.xls Prepared: 3/21/2006

Page 19: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 3: Lab Evaluation

Question 12: The Instructor Explains Appropriate Safety Procedures For This Laboratory/Clinical

0.8

6.8

26.3

65.6

0.5 1.31.912.1

28.756.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=4244)

Agree(n=1818)

Neutral(n=561)

Disagree(n=72)

StronglyDisagree(n=51)Responses (Total=6,746)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 13: The Instructor Links the Laboratory Exercises to Lecture

66.0

25.27.3

0.9 0.7 1.9

54.728.8

12.02.6

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=4240)

Agree(n=1769)

Neutral(n=586)

Disagree(n=92)

StronglyDisagree(n=68)

Responses (Total=6,755)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q12&13.xls Prepared: 3/21/2006

Page 20: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office of Institutional Research

Student Evaluation of Instruction, Fall 2005Workforce - Full-Time/Part-Time Analysis

Part 4: Overall Evaluation

Question 14: The Instructor Encourages Me to Become Actively Engaged in theLearning Process

0.81.45.8

26.9

65.160.5

1.22.48.7

27.2

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6773)

Agree (n=2871) Neutral (n=712) Disagree(n=181)

StronglyDisagree(n=99)Responses (Total=10,636)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Question 15: I Would Recommend This Instructor to Other Students

1.72.37.122.2

66.8

3.03.310.123.6

60.0

0.0

20.0

40.0

60.0

80.0

100.0

Strongly Agree(n=6841)

Agree(n=2392)

Neutral(n=850)

Disagree(n=273)

StronglyDisagree(n=219)Responses (Total=10,575)

Perc

enta

ge

Full-Time Instructors Part-Time Instructors

Fall05_SEOI_CumulRpt_WFC, WFC_FTPT_Q14&15.xls Prepared: 3/21/2006

Page 21: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for Judgment

Total

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 1 1Row % 100.0 100.0

Willie L Gay Hall Count 193 143 76 11 9 108 540Row % 35.7 26.5 14.1 2.0 1.7 20.0 100.0

Central Count 3317 2415 1770 274 161 2435 10372Row % 32.0 23.3 17.1 2.6 1.6 23.5 100.0

Coleman Health Sci Ctr Count 1207 988 608 84 31 684 3602Row % 33.5 27.4 16.9 2.3 0.9 19.0 100.0

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 6 6Row % 100.0 100.0

Automotive Tech. C Count 121 70 52 18 4 16 281Row % 43.1 24.9 18.5 6.4 1.4 5.7 100.0

Distance Ed.-NE Count 3 3Row % 100.0 100.0

Northline Ctr Count 1206 824 463 52 27 544 3116Row % 38.7 26.4 14.9 1.7 0.9 17.5 100.0

Northeast Campus Count 133 97 54 7 4 68 363Row % 36.6 26.7 14.9 1.9 1.1 18.7 100.0

CE Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0 100.0

Pinemont Ctr Count 373 232 137 23 8 213 986Row % 37.8 23.5 13.9 2.3 0.8 21.6 100.0

Northwest NW Dual Credit Count 2 1 4 7Row % 28.6 14.3 57.1 100.0

Town&Country Ctr Count 2455 1815 1486 207 115 2211 8289Row % 29.6 21.9 17.9 2.5 1.4 26.7 100.0

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Results for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2005 (Exclusive of Distance Education responses)

rg: Fall2005_library_means.xls 1 02-23-2006

Page 22: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for Judgment

Total

Question LR1: "The library resources were adequate for the needs of this course."

Results for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2005 (Exclusive of Distance Education responses)

Northwest Westgate Ctr Count 1076 696 627 68 41 1038 3546Row % 30.3 19.6 17.7 1.9 1.2 29.3 100.0

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 2 3 5Row % 40.0 60.0 100.0

Eastside Ctr Count 1991 1429 768 83 33 706 5010Row % 39.7 28.5 15.3 1.7 0.7 14.1 100.0

Southwest Not Identified Count 26 28 27 12 14 78 185Row % 14.1 15.1 14.6 6.5 7.6 42.2 100.0

Gulfton Ctr Count 209 206 154 36 12 71 688Row % 30.4 29.9 22.4 5.2 1.7 10.3 100.0

SW Dual Credit Count 14 14 12 29 69Row % 20.3 20.3 17.4 42.0 100.0

Alief Ctr Count 841 671 472 77 48 415 2524Row % 33.3 26.6 18.7 3.1 1.9 16.4 100.0

Main Ctr - SW Count 3 5 3 4 15Row % 20.0 33.3 20.0 26.7 100.0

Stafford Ctr Count 3244 2317 1762 252 106 1969 9650Row % 33.6 24.0 18.3 2.6 1.1 20.4 100.0

Missouri City Ctr Count 32 13 10 3 22 80Row % 40.0 16.3 12.5 3.8 27.5 100.0

West Loop Ctr Count 1046 812 784 205 135 1044 4026Row % 26.0 20.2 19.5 5.1 3.4 25.9 100.0

Distance Ed.-SW Count 1 1 1 1 4Row % 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 100.0

rg: Fall2005_library_means.xls 2 02-23-2006

Page 23: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for Judgment

Total

Central Distance Ed.-CE Count 1 1Row % 100.0 100.0

Willie L Gay Hall Count 180 130 81 9 6 128 534Row % 33.7 24.3 15.2 1.7 1.1 24.0 100.0

Central Count 3185 2251 1787 179 80 2808 10290Row % 31.0 21.9 17.4 1.7 0.8 27.3 100.0

Coleman Health Sci Ctr Count 1172 901 645 58 21 787 3584Row % 32.7 25.1 18.0 1.6 0.6 22.0 100.0

Northeast NEC-Off Campus Count 6 6Row % 100.0 100.0

Automotive Tech. C Count 118 83 47 11 2 16 277Row % 42.6 30.0 17.0 4.0 0.7 5.8 100.0

Distance Ed.-NE Count 3 3Row % 100.0 100.0

Northline Ctr Count 1121 767 494 36 16 657 3091Row % 36.3 24.8 16.0 1.2 0.5 21.3 100.0

Northeast Campus Count 124 88 49 6 3 87 357Row % 34.7 24.6 13.7 1.7 0.8 24.4 100.0

CE Dual Credit Count 1 1Row % 100.0 100.0

Pinemont Ctr Count 347 214 149 15 7 245 977Row % 35.5 21.9 15.3 1.5 0.7 25.1 100.0

Northwest NW Dual Credit Count 2 1 4 7Row % 28.6 14.3 57.1 100.0

Town&Country Ctr Count 2331 1652 1467 108 81 2560 8199Row % 28.4 20.1 17.9 1.3 1.0 31.2 100.0

Results for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2005 (Exclusive of Distance Education responses)

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

rg: Fall2005_library_means.xls 3 02-23-2006

Page 24: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

College Campus Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

Disagree

No Basis for Judgment

Total

Results for Library Resources Questions, Student Evaluation of Instruction Fall 2005 (Exclusive of Distance Education responses)

Question LR2: "The library instruction received for this course was adequate."

Northwest Westgate Ctr Count 1030 629 625 40 31 1163 3518Row % 29.3 17.9 17.8 1.1 0.9 33.1 100.0

Southeast Distance Ed.-SE Count 2 3 5Row % 40.0 60.0 100.0

Eastside Ctr Count 1841 1414 811 55 26 833 4980Row % 37.0 28.4 16.3 1.1 0.5 16.7 100.0

Southwest Not Identified Count 24 23 29 9 3 97 185Row % 13.0 12.4 15.7 4.9 1.6 52.4 100.0

Gulfton Ctr Count 202 209 125 24 9 77 646Row % 31.3 32.4 19.3 3.7 1.4 11.9 100.0

SW Dual Credit Count 13 11 13 31 68Row % 19.1 16.2 19.1 45.6 100.0

Alief Ctr Count 786 646 486 56 36 491 2501Row % 31.4 25.8 19.4 2.2 1.4 19.6 100.0

Main Ctr - SW Count 3 4 3 5 15Row % 20.0 26.7 20.0 33.3 100.0

Stafford Ctr Count 3056 2191 1828 176 86 2235 9572Row % 31.9 22.9 19.1 1.8 0.9 23.3 100.0

Missouri City Ctr Count 32 13 10 1 24 80Row % 40.0 16.3 12.5 1.3 30.0 100.0

West Loop Ctr Count 1004 769 766 125 78 1228 3970Row % 25.3 19.4 19.3 3.1 2.0 30.9 100.0

Distance Ed.-SW Count 1 2 1 4Row % 25.0 50.0 25.0 100.0

rg: Fall2005_library_means.xls 4 02-23-2006

Page 25: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ACCT Northeast

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 . . 1.00 1.00

Northwest

N 42 42 37 43 43 42 43 42 40 42 43 11 11 43 42 Mean 1.07 1.17 1.35 1.49 1.47 1.31 1.81 1.29 1.48 1.55 1.40 1.73 1.73 1.63 1.57

N 43 43 38 44 44 43 44 43 41 43 44 11 11 44 43 Mean 1.07 1.16 1.37 1.48 1.45 1.30 1.82 1.28 1.46 1.53 1.41 1.73 1.73 1.61 1.56

AGRI Northwest

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

ANTH Central

N 60 57 56 60 60 60 59 59 55 59 59 10 10 58 58 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.14 1.48 1.40 1.28 1.88 1.15 1.40 1.44 1.56 1.80 1.80 1.41 1.45

Northeast

N 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 4 5 5 5 0 0 5 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.60 . . 1.20 1.00

Northwest

N 57 57 57 58 58 58 57 57 54 52 58 5 4 57 57 Mean 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.40 1.53 1.43 1.60 1.26 1.37 1.46 1.52 1.60 1.50 1.32 1.60

Southeast

N 19 19 18 19 19 19 18 19 19 17 18 4 3 19 19 Mean 1.11 1.21 1.06 1.37 1.32 1.21 1.44 1.11 1.16 1.53 1.11 1.75 1.67 1.16 1.16

Southwest

N 68 67 64 67 70 69 67 70 67 66 65 26 26 70 69 Mean 1.13 1.19 1.33 1.57 1.64 1.51 1.76 1.40 1.70 1.80 1.62 1.50 1.62 1.67 1.61

N 211 207 201 210 213 211 206 209 200 199 205 45 43 209 207 Mean 1.08 1.11 1.16 1.47 1.51 1.39 1.71 1.26 1.47 1.57 1.53 1.60 1.65 1.44 1.51

ARTS Central

N 421 318 390 380 424 421 409 422 397 388 406 201 194 418 419 Mean 1.10 1.24 1.23 1.58 1.55 1.42 1.67 1.38 1.56 1.62 1.67 1.51 1.43 1.54 1.58

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 1 2/24/2006

Page 26: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ARTS Northeast

N 118 115 107 117 120 119 116 120 118 111 115 23 22 117 114 Mean 1.09 1.06 1.21 1.48 1.37 1.37 1.58 1.23 1.48 1.88 1.63 1.57 1.50 1.56 1.51

Northwest

N 390 342 371 383 398 397 392 395 371 374 389 88 82 393 391 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.18 1.46 1.56 1.45 1.66 1.37 1.50 1.68 1.57 1.66 1.68 1.65 1.61

Southeast

N 133 132 130 131 135 136 136 134 134 126 134 32 33 136 136 Mean 1.08 1.09 1.12 1.35 1.36 1.36 1.51 1.25 1.42 1.72 1.47 1.78 1.52 1.44 1.44

Southwest

N 490 442 460 478 504 501 488 504 474 479 489 187 173 498 493 Mean 1.13 1.18 1.25 1.51 1.63 1.55 1.76 1.40 1.54 1.77 1.69 1.61 1.61 1.67 1.75

N 1552 1349 1458 1489 1581 1574 1541 1575 1494 1478 1533 531 504 1562 1553 Mean 1.10 1.16 1.21 1.50 1.55 1.46 1.68 1.36 1.52 1.71 1.63 1.59 1.54 1.60 1.62

BCIS Central

N 47 47 47 50 49 49 48 50 49 48 50 25 29 49 47 Mean 1.04 1.02 1.11 1.46 1.59 1.39 1.65 1.64 1.55 1.85 1.62 1.76 1.38 1.63 1.64

Northwest

N 91 90 89 92 92 92 91 92 85 89 90 51 56 91 90 Mean 1.01 1.03 1.03 1.47 1.66 1.40 1.55 1.43 1.45 1.66 1.57 1.65 1.54 1.73 1.63

Southeast

N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 5 5 7 7 Mean 1.14 1.57 1.29 2.29 2.43 2.29 2.29 2.14 2.29 2.17 2.29 2.40 2.40 2.71 3.00

Southwest

N 101 99 94 103 103 102 102 103 96 99 102 40 43 101 102 Mean 1.08 1.07 1.12 1.34 1.42 1.32 1.68 1.26 1.28 1.45 1.41 1.48 1.44 1.50 1.48

N 246 243 237 252 251 250 248 252 237 242 249 121 133 248 246 Mean 1.05 1.06 1.09 1.44 1.57 1.39 1.64 1.42 1.43 1.63 1.53 1.64 1.50 1.65 1.61

BIOL Central

N 740 719 698 750 756 738 743 750 714 716 746 609 601 749 743 Mean 1.12 1.18 1.27 1.63 1.77 1.54 1.87 1.40 1.65 1.74 1.68 1.45 1.56 1.70 1.82

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 2 2/24/2006

Page 27: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BIOL HS

N 46 45 42 45 46 45 46 46 43 44 46 44 45 45 45 Mean 1.02 1.07 1.12 1.31 1.61 1.24 1.39 1.09 1.21 1.41 1.17 1.27 1.27 1.42 1.44

Northeast

N 591 570 559 598 598 589 591 595 582 572 589 582 574 598 595 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.19 1.48 1.53 1.39 1.59 1.31 1.46 1.56 1.48 1.36 1.40 1.48 1.55

Northwest

N 980 953 916 1000 1002 984 993 995 962 964 980 967 966 997 998 Mean 1.11 1.19 1.26 1.47 1.67 1.42 1.73 1.38 1.57 1.69 1.57 1.43 1.48 1.58 1.67

Southeast

N 464 447 428 474 476 473 470 472 459 456 470 446 446 474 473 Mean 1.09 1.20 1.26 1.53 1.62 1.44 1.76 1.36 1.53 1.76 1.49 1.39 1.43 1.50 1.59

Southwest

N 1061 1050 982 1078 1084 1039 1067 1082 1021 1030 1059 1002 1005 1086 1073 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.34 1.73 1.98 1.66 1.98 1.54 1.71 1.91 1.80 1.64 1.70 1.85 2.04

N 3882 3784 3625 3945 3962 3868 3910 3940 3781 3782 3890 3650 3637 3949 3927 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.27 1.58 1.74 1.50 1.81 1.41 1.60 1.75 1.62 1.47 1.53 1.65 1.77

CHEM Central

N 281 276 253 287 288 284 287 288 276 273 283 288 285 284 282 Mean 1.11 1.41 1.28 1.48 1.89 1.56 1.86 1.41 1.62 1.62 1.71 1.42 1.70 1.63 1.78

Northeast

N 61 60 56 61 61 57 61 61 59 57 59 60 60 59 60 Mean 1.16 1.25 1.38 1.66 1.77 1.42 1.89 1.23 1.46 1.74 1.69 1.35 1.40 1.49 1.78

Northwest

N 422 420 375 436 435 427 427 431 414 421 429 429 426 434 431 Mean 1.06 1.26 1.39 1.52 1.76 1.43 1.78 1.43 1.62 1.69 1.55 1.37 1.46 1.61 1.73

Southeast

N 139 133 123 143 143 142 143 144 137 142 144 141 140 143 139 Mean 1.12 1.42 1.26 1.48 1.87 1.48 1.68 1.50 1.64 1.75 1.53 1.51 1.71 1.64 1.65

Southwest

N 344 333 319 342 348 339 342 348 333 334 337 343 344 348 347 Mean 1.06 1.40 1.23 1.46 1.59 1.51 1.67 1.32 1.48 1.60 1.61 1.27 1.46 1.54 1.60

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 3 2/24/2006

Page 28: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 1247 1222 1126 1269 1275 1249 1260 1272 1219 1227 1252 1261 1255 1268 1259 Mean 1.08 1.35 1.31 1.49 1.76 1.49 1.76 1.39 1.58 1.66 1.61 1.37 1.54 1.59 1.70

CHIN Central

N 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 4 4 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.42 1.09 1.25 1.00 1.17 1.33 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.17 1.25

N 11 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 4 4 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.42 1.09 1.25 1.00 1.17 1.33 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.17 1.25

COMM Central

N 35 35 34 35 35 35 34 34 34 34 34 5 5 35 35 Mean 1.00 1.03 1.03 1.09 1.26 1.23 1.26 1.03 1.26 1.38 1.24 1.60 1.60 1.14 1.09

Northwest

N 25 25 22 25 25 25 25 25 21 24 25 9 9 25 25 Mean 1.12 1.04 1.36 1.48 1.68 1.52 1.60 1.48 1.57 1.83 1.88 1.22 1.56 1.60 1.88

Southwest

N 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 30 32 8 8 32 32 Mean 1.19 1.63 1.75 2.03 2.00 1.88 2.53 1.78 1.84 1.90 2.28 2.00 2.00 1.81 1.94

N 92 92 88 92 92 92 91 91 87 88 91 22 22 92 92 Mean 1.10 1.24 1.38 1.52 1.63 1.53 1.80 1.42 1.55 1.68 1.78 1.59 1.73 1.50 1.60

COSC Central

N 10 10 9 10 10 10 10 10 9 9 10 2 4 10 9 Mean 1.30 1.50 1.33 1.60 1.60 1.50 1.40 1.40 1.44 1.56 1.80 2.50 1.50 1.50 2.00

Northwest

N 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 16 18 18 10 11 17 18 Mean 1.06 1.22 1.11 1.61 1.94 1.50 1.72 2.11 1.81 1.89 1.67 1.80 1.45 1.71 2.00

Southwest

N 46 45 42 46 46 46 46 45 44 46 46 27 37 46 46 Mean 1.00 1.42 1.24 1.35 1.74 1.43 1.70 1.42 1.57 1.74 1.59 1.59 1.51 1.65 1.72

N 74 73 69 74 74 74 74 73 69 73 74 39 52 73 73 Mean 1.05 1.38 1.22 1.45 1.77 1.46 1.66 1.59 1.61 1.75 1.64 1.69 1.50 1.64 1.82

CRIJ Northeast

N 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 17 21 4 3 21 20 Mean 1.05 1.05 1.10 1.10 1.05 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.19 1.06 1.24 1.00 1.00 1.19 1.00

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 4 2/24/2006

Page 29: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CRIJ Northwest

N 28 28 28 29 29 29 29 29 29 28 29 7 7 29 28 Mean 1.07 1.32 1.25 1.28 1.34 1.24 1.45 1.17 1.21 1.32 1.28 1.86 1.86 1.28 1.29

Southeast

N 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 16 16 5 5 17 17 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.12 1.06 1.18 1.06 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.44 1.40 1.40 1.18 1.00

Southwest

N 54 52 49 54 54 53 52 54 52 51 53 10 8 54 54 Mean 1.02 1.12 1.02 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.21 1.07 1.25 1.61 1.25 1.20 1.25 1.24 1.13

N 120 118 115 121 121 120 119 121 118 112 119 26 23 121 119 Mean 1.03 1.14 1.10 1.18 1.17 1.16 1.23 1.07 1.23 1.44 1.28 1.38 1.43 1.23 1.13

DANC Central

N 99 55 88 98 101 98 94 98 96 94 92 53 52 100 99 Mean 1.06 1.22 1.20 1.30 1.37 1.40 1.51 1.24 1.44 1.72 1.59 1.30 1.31 1.28 1.38

Northwest

N 52 19 37 37 52 51 52 52 50 49 47 23 18 52 52 Mean 1.02 1.21 1.03 1.32 1.21 1.18 1.44 1.23 1.32 1.41 1.36 1.13 1.28 1.19 1.29

N 151 74 125 135 153 149 146 150 146 143 139 76 70 152 151 Mean 1.05 1.22 1.15 1.30 1.31 1.32 1.49 1.24 1.40 1.62 1.51 1.25 1.30 1.25 1.35

DRAM Central

N 51 50 50 50 51 51 50 51 49 51 51 22 23 50 50 Mean 1.04 1.06 1.10 1.52 1.33 1.35 1.52 1.37 1.43 1.47 1.45 1.27 1.35 1.14 1.32

Northeast

N 8 5 8 7 9 9 7 8 8 8 7 4 4 9 9 Mean 1.25 2.00 1.50 2.29 2.44 1.44 1.86 2.13 2.25 3.00 2.57 2.50 2.50 2.33 2.89

Northwest

N 57 46 53 47 60 60 58 60 57 54 51 21 22 60 59 Mean 1.09 1.26 1.09 1.68 1.37 1.28 1.71 1.47 1.32 1.67 1.51 1.71 1.82 1.30 1.36

Southwest

N 57 52 52 56 57 57 57 56 57 57 55 21 17 55 56 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.06 1.36 1.37 1.28 1.35 1.21 1.39 1.53 1.38 1.57 1.76 1.47 1.41

N 173 153 163 160 177 177 172 175 171 170 164 68 66 174 174

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 5 2/24/2006

Page 30: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.08 1.16 1.10 1.54 1.41 1.31 1.54 1.39 1.42 1.62 1.49 1.57 1.68 1.36 1.44

ECON Central

N 178 174 146 181 181 180 178 179 170 176 178 42 42 179 178 Mean 1.17 1.30 1.36 1.57 2.09 1.55 1.87 1.56 1.72 1.86 1.77 1.86 1.88 1.61 1.85

Northeast

N 49 47 43 48 49 48 49 49 45 47 49 14 12 48 48 Mean 1.08 1.21 1.42 1.65 1.63 1.60 1.94 1.45 1.49 1.94 1.65 1.79 2.00 1.46 1.73

Northwest

N 280 278 231 283 282 272 279 283 263 271 273 54 53 283 281 Mean 1.08 1.15 1.32 1.45 1.59 1.44 1.72 1.30 1.43 1.69 1.49 1.54 1.62 1.49 1.54

Southeast

N 77 73 66 78 79 78 78 78 76 77 78 18 17 76 77 Mean 1.05 1.15 1.42 1.29 1.56 1.37 1.55 1.19 1.39 1.69 1.49 1.39 1.29 1.43 1.43

Southwest

N 415 406 367 423 425 414 417 423 398 405 411 116 107 422 421 Mean 1.18 1.48 1.40 1.65 1.68 1.61 1.97 1.55 1.69 1.74 1.73 1.79 1.84 1.72 1.91

N 999 978 853 1013 1016 992 1001 1012 952 976 989 244 231 1008 1005 Mean 1.14 1.31 1.38 1.55 1.72 1.53 1.85 1.45 1.59 1.76 1.65 1.72 1.77 1.60 1.75

EDUC Central

N 24 24 20 24 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 6 6 24 24 Mean 1.04 1.42 1.15 1.42 1.33 1.38 1.54 1.38 1.54 1.48 1.54 1.83 1.83 1.54 1.63

Northeast

N 41 41 40 41 41 41 40 41 39 40 39 13 13 41 41 Mean 1.07 1.02 1.05 1.07 1.10 1.10 1.15 1.10 1.08 1.53 1.13 1.46 1.46 1.10 1.10

Northwest

N 37 37 35 36 37 37 37 36 34 35 36 2 2 37 36 Mean 1.11 1.27 1.17 1.75 1.92 1.57 1.84 1.47 1.65 1.66 1.64 2.00 2.00 1.62 1.83

Southeast

N 16 16 14 16 15 16 16 16 16 16 16 5 5 16 16 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.25 1.07 1.13 1.31 1.00 1.19 1.94 1.31 1.40 1.40 1.19 1.06

Southwest

N 67 66 64 69 68 68 68 67 67 62 68 14 11 68 67

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 6 2/24/2006

Page 31: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.03 1.18 1.19 1.32 1.19 1.25 1.56 1.16 1.25 2.13 1.31 1.43 1.45 1.18 1.21

N 185 184 173 186 185 186 185 184 180 176 183 40 37 186 184 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.16 1.35 1.32 1.28 1.50 1.22 1.32 1.80 1.37 1.53 1.54 1.30 1.35

ENGD Central

N 238 234 218 228 241 240 233 240 231 225 236 92 87 237 237 Mean 1.13 1.12 1.30 1.43 1.41 1.43 1.59 1.29 1.47 1.85 1.51 1.75 1.74 1.41 1.47

Northeast

N 182 180 173 182 184 183 181 182 180 176 180 70 63 184 178 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.42 1.49 1.42 1.45 1.64 1.30 1.68 1.89 1.67 1.89 1.86 1.63 1.49

Northwest

N 247 244 238 253 253 248 247 248 248 241 245 117 112 247 241 Mean 1.19 1.23 1.34 1.55 1.69 1.55 1.71 1.46 1.53 1.85 1.64 1.73 1.67 1.72 1.79

Southeast

N 168 166 161 168 167 166 166 167 166 161 168 90 87 168 166 Mean 1.19 1.39 1.32 1.61 1.61 1.51 1.61 1.41 1.50 1.81 1.65 1.82 1.84 1.55 1.63

Southwest

N 404 397 378 396 403 403 392 400 402 387 394 215 210 403 401 Mean 1.06 1.15 1.28 1.41 1.38 1.38 1.52 1.32 1.41 1.71 1.55 1.59 1.60 1.43 1.42

N 1239 1221 1168 1227 1248 1240 1219 1237 1227 1190 1223 584 559 1239 1223 Mean 1.13 1.19 1.32 1.48 1.49 1.45 1.60 1.35 1.50 1.80 1.59 1.71 1.70 1.53 1.54

ENGF Central

N 167 161 160 169 171 171 171 167 166 168 170 106 107 171 171 Mean 1.16 1.29 1.38 1.54 1.52 1.58 1.75 1.46 1.69 1.82 1.65 1.76 1.87 1.65 1.74

Northwest

N 74 74 71 73 74 74 73 73 73 73 71 37 36 73 74 Mean 1.12 1.16 1.18 1.41 1.35 1.36 1.44 1.25 1.47 1.44 1.45 1.62 1.69 1.44 1.42

Southeast

N 31 30 30 32 32 32 30 32 32 32 32 13 12 32 32 Mean 1.13 1.20 1.43 1.63 1.44 1.59 1.83 1.59 1.50 1.97 1.75 1.85 1.83 1.75 1.53

Southwest

N 302 299 291 312 315 313 315 313 312 308 305 180 175 313 309 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.33 1.36 1.38 1.45 1.58 1.47 1.47 1.63 1.56 1.55 1.64 1.57 1.62

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 7 2/24/2006

Page 32: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 574 564 552 586 592 590 589 585 583 581 578 336 330 589 586 Mean 1.12 1.19 1.33 1.44 1.42 1.48 1.62 1.44 1.54 1.68 1.58 1.64 1.73 1.59 1.62

ENGL Central

N 897 884 819 872 914 912 878 906 870 855 877 307 300 898 893 Mean 1.19 1.17 1.33 1.62 1.58 1.54 1.78 1.48 1.59 1.84 1.77 1.78 1.83 1.58 1.71

Northeast

N 380 383 338 372 391 388 386 388 379 357 387 114 106 387 387 Mean 1.16 1.20 1.37 1.59 1.68 1.55 1.84 1.53 1.72 1.99 1.80 1.81 1.92 1.64 1.80

Northwest

N 1186 1155 1078 1127 1192 1192 1176 1191 1139 1103 1169 233 225 1192 1189 Mean 1.12 1.23 1.29 1.55 1.60 1.49 1.85 1.45 1.59 1.87 1.71 1.81 1.84 1.64 1.72

Southeast

N 454 447 437 445 458 459 454 459 445 433 448 141 142 453 455 Mean 1.10 1.11 1.23 1.52 1.60 1.45 1.67 1.39 1.49 1.78 1.59 1.60 1.68 1.54 1.64

Southwest

N 1751 1718 1591 1652 1769 1767 1741 1763 1715 1679 1729 491 467 1753 1742 Mean 1.09 1.15 1.26 1.50 1.50 1.41 1.68 1.35 1.48 1.80 1.60 1.67 1.69 1.55 1.61

N 4668 4587 4263 4468 4724 4718 4635 4707 4548 4427 4610 1286 1240 4683 4666 Mean 1.12 1.17 1.29 1.55 1.57 1.47 1.75 1.42 1.55 1.84 1.68 1.73 1.77 1.58 1.67

ENVR Central

N 33 33 32 33 33 33 33 32 32 31 32 15 15 33 31 Mean 1.03 1.09 1.06 1.52 1.55 1.45 1.79 1.28 1.38 1.48 1.53 1.40 1.33 1.64 1.55

Northwest

N 58 57 57 58 58 56 58 58 54 54 58 12 12 56 56 Mean 1.22 1.26 1.40 1.88 2.00 1.71 1.98 1.60 1.81 1.87 1.66 1.92 1.83 1.88 1.98

Southeast

N 23 23 20 23 23 23 23 22 23 22 22 7 7 23 23 Mean 1.13 1.04 1.20 1.48 1.61 1.57 1.70 1.45 1.57 1.82 1.59 1.43 1.43 1.83 1.78

Southwest

N 114 111 105 118 117 113 116 117 113 112 114 32 28 117 116 Mean 1.14 1.21 1.33 1.72 1.91 1.64 1.97 1.58 1.65 1.92 1.73 1.91 2.04 1.80 1.97

N 228 224 214 232 231 225 230 229 222 219 226 66 62 229 226 Mean 1.14 1.19 1.30 1.71 1.85 1.62 1.92 1.53 1.64 1.84 1.67 1.74 1.76 1.80 1.89

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 8 2/24/2006

Page 33: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ESOL Central

N 168 165 164 173 174 172 172 173 168 169 171 155 159 172 169 Mean 1.27 1.26 1.43 1.63 1.71 1.72 1.80 1.65 1.71 1.79 1.78 1.70 1.75 1.85 1.82

Northeast

N 251 246 243 261 263 257 255 259 259 260 258 132 133 258 256 Mean 1.17 1.27 1.36 1.59 1.59 1.67 1.62 1.39 1.56 1.63 1.71 1.80 1.74 1.68 1.70

Northwest

N 156 156 151 165 162 162 161 165 163 164 164 118 150 161 162 Mean 1.15 1.29 1.31 1.48 1.38 1.49 1.48 1.33 1.46 1.48 1.52 1.62 1.70 1.45 1.42

Southeast

N 487 483 483 502 502 499 496 498 493 498 494 373 391 498 495 Mean 1.14 1.25 1.19 1.36 1.29 1.42 1.45 1.28 1.29 1.35 1.39 1.47 1.54 1.38 1.36

Southwest

N 1116 1108 1090 1166 1168 1161 1162 1162 1166 1165 1154 410 431 1139 1130 Mean 1.19 1.23 1.28 1.48 1.46 1.52 1.59 1.45 1.47 1.53 1.55 1.63 1.62 1.53 1.54

N 2178 2158 2131 2267 2269 2251 2246 2257 2249 2256 2241 1188 1264 2228 2212 Mean 1.18 1.25 1.29 1.48 1.45 1.53 1.57 1.41 1.45 1.51 1.55 1.61 1.63 1.53 1.53

FREN Central

N 53 53 53 53 54 54 52 54 52 51 53 25 27 54 54 Mean 1.17 1.21 1.21 1.38 1.54 1.46 1.46 1.41 1.40 1.53 1.34 1.60 1.56 1.41 1.43

Northeast

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 1 2 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.20 1.40 1.00 1.20 1.25 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.60

Northwest

N 28 28 27 32 31 31 31 31 29 30 31 6 7 32 31 Mean 1.39 1.46 1.37 1.34 1.48 1.42 1.55 1.48 1.69 1.43 1.55 1.33 1.29 1.34 1.55

Southwest

N 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 5 5 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.33 1.08 1.08 1.00 1.09 1.25 1.00 1.60 1.60 1.08 1.08

N 98 98 97 102 102 102 100 102 97 97 101 37 41 103 102 Mean 1.20 1.24 1.22 1.34 1.49 1.39 1.44 1.36 1.44 1.45 1.36 1.54 1.49 1.34 1.43

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 9 2/24/2006

Page 34: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GEOG Central

N 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 13 14 7 7 14 14 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.27 1.40 1.54 1.36 1.71 1.71 1.21 1.21

Northeast

N 12 12 11 12 12 12 11 12 11 12 12 2 0 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.17 1.09 1.67 1.33 1.58 1.64 1.25 1.36 1.75 1.50 1.50 . 1.58 1.67

Northwest

N 70 70 70 72 72 71 70 70 69 69 72 11 10 72 72 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.09 1.38 1.19 1.24 1.83 1.14 1.25 1.67 1.31 1.73 1.80 1.29 1.38

Southeast

N 12 11 10 12 12 11 9 12 12 10 8 2 2 12 11 Mean 1.25 1.27 1.20 1.83 1.92 1.55 1.67 2.00 1.50 1.90 1.50 2.50 2.50 1.58 2.18

Southwest

N 34 32 31 35 33 34 33 35 32 31 32 13 13 34 34 Mean 1.09 1.25 1.13 1.46 1.55 1.50 1.52 1.43 1.44 2.13 1.47 1.85 1.77 1.62 1.53

N 143 140 136 146 144 143 138 144 139 135 138 35 32 144 143 Mean 1.06 1.16 1.10 1.45 1.35 1.36 1.67 1.31 1.34 1.79 1.38 1.80 1.81 1.41 1.48

GEOL Central

N 66 64 61 66 66 65 65 66 60 63 66 38 44 65 66 Mean 1.09 1.13 1.20 1.38 1.50 1.34 1.52 1.23 1.45 1.57 1.65 1.55 1.41 1.75 1.52

Northeast

N 21 20 20 21 21 21 20 20 19 20 21 16 16 21 20 Mean 1.48 1.05 1.45 2.00 2.33 1.62 1.75 1.45 1.68 1.70 1.76 1.88 1.88 1.95 2.00

Northwest

N 131 131 122 132 133 129 131 133 125 122 130 72 90 132 131 Mean 1.05 1.12 1.19 1.44 1.68 1.39 1.66 1.26 1.50 1.57 1.57 1.42 1.37 1.61 1.64

Southeast

N 33 37 36 36 37 35 35 37 36 33 36 24 24 37 37 Mean 1.61 1.24 1.42 2.11 2.73 2.11 2.20 1.73 1.94 1.91 2.17 1.88 1.88 2.14 2.22

Southwest

N 103 102 99 104 104 103 104 105 103 100 104 87 88 105 103 Mean 1.19 1.19 1.32 1.70 1.89 1.64 1.71 1.48 1.59 1.68 1.76 1.66 1.60 1.70 1.84

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 10 2/24/2006

Page 35: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 354 354 338 359 361 353 355 361 343 338 357 237 262 360 357 Mean 1.18 1.15 1.27 1.60 1.85 1.54 1.71 1.38 1.58 1.64 1.71 1.60 1.53 1.74 1.76

GERM Southwest

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 Mean 1.00 2.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.50

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 Mean 1.00 2.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 3.00 3.00 1.50 1.50

GOVT Central

N 511 506 417 517 521 509 514 515 491 477 498 141 131 514 512 Mean 1.14 1.19 1.46 1.63 1.76 1.61 1.91 1.54 1.80 1.88 1.84 1.79 1.84 1.70 1.78

Northeast

N 279 278 246 283 284 284 281 283 264 269 279 79 76 278 278 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.28 1.54 1.58 1.39 1.65 1.32 1.47 1.71 1.62 1.63 1.72 1.58 1.60

Northwest

N 754 736 677 755 758 746 749 754 712 718 749 148 139 757 754 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.27 1.55 1.64 1.49 1.89 1.38 1.57 1.86 1.64 1.75 1.83 1.63 1.71

Southeast

N 243 240 227 246 247 244 244 245 239 235 243 62 61 242 241 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.26 1.54 1.47 1.44 1.61 1.36 1.44 1.78 1.57 1.63 1.59 1.48 1.48

Southwest

N 1350 1322 1240 1375 1375 1356 1360 1360 1308 1301 1346 353 334 1357 1353 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.25 1.43 1.45 1.42 1.68 1.32 1.49 1.71 1.55 1.70 1.76 1.52 1.54

N 3137 3082 2807 3176 3185 3139 3148 3157 3014 3000 3115 783 741 3148 3138 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.29 1.51 1.56 1.46 1.76 1.38 1.55 1.78 1.62 1.72 1.77 1.58 1.62

GUST Central

N 716 717 678 733 730 729 726 730 709 691 718 406 404 728 722 Mean 1.09 1.10 1.32 1.34 1.33 1.39 1.53 1.27 1.49 1.74 1.56 1.56 1.63 1.44 1.41

Northeast

N 411 411 392 418 416 418 416 417 404 404 414 272 273 420 417 Mean 1.08 1.23 1.27 1.36 1.35 1.38 1.47 1.35 1.53 1.68 1.58 1.61 1.65 1.42 1.40

Northwest

N 554 547 533 559 568 559 560 560 547 538 546 270 267 560 557 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.31 1.42 1.45 1.42 1.57 1.38 1.50 1.68 1.52 1.73 1.70 1.48 1.48

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 11 2/24/2006

Page 36: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

GUST Southeast

N 401 374 382 388 408 398 388 404 384 367 376 245 245 401 405 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.32 1.49 1.55 1.53 1.62 1.40 1.56 1.85 1.69 1.67 1.75 1.51 1.57

Southwest

N 1153 1134 1104 1169 1175 1170 1159 1169 1154 1124 1145 820 816 1168 1155 Mean 1.11 1.12 1.31 1.43 1.45 1.49 1.59 1.38 1.52 1.79 1.64 1.64 1.65 1.47 1.53

N 3235 3183 3089 3267 3297 3274 3249 3280 3198 3124 3199 2013 2005 3277 3256 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.31 1.41 1.42 1.45 1.56 1.35 1.52 1.75 1.60 1.63 1.67 1.46 1.48

HIST Central

N 661 650 579 669 669 662 653 669 635 617 650 164 157 659 654 Mean 1.08 1.24 1.30 1.43 1.45 1.44 1.73 1.33 1.53 1.78 1.67 1.71 1.78 1.67 1.58

Northeast

N 333 334 318 341 340 339 340 341 322 317 339 107 104 339 338 Mean 1.05 1.08 1.19 1.40 1.45 1.40 1.66 1.39 1.60 1.77 1.58 1.65 1.67 1.59 1.49

Northwest

N 910 872 832 905 915 907 893 914 850 851 883 169 152 905 908 Mean 1.10 1.35 1.28 1.56 1.53 1.51 1.85 1.40 1.56 1.87 1.73 1.79 1.82 1.65 1.68

Southeast

N 360 358 347 359 364 362 361 361 360 346 358 82 78 363 361 Mean 1.07 1.18 1.21 1.49 1.43 1.41 1.64 1.25 1.49 1.79 1.63 1.66 1.69 1.53 1.48

Southwest

N 1379 1320 1290 1387 1390 1377 1373 1390 1343 1327 1359 398 365 1372 1365 Mean 1.08 1.24 1.24 1.47 1.49 1.46 1.74 1.36 1.55 1.75 1.65 1.73 1.83 1.61 1.58

N 3643 3534 3366 3661 3678 3647 3620 3675 3510 3458 3589 920 856 3638 3626 Mean 1.08 1.25 1.25 1.48 1.48 1.46 1.75 1.36 1.55 1.79 1.66 1.72 1.79 1.62 1.58

HUMA Central

N 36 34 33 36 38 38 37 38 37 37 37 8 6 38 38 Mean 1.08 1.21 1.03 1.28 1.13 1.18 1.30 1.11 1.24 1.59 1.24 1.25 1.00 1.16 1.16

Northeast

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 3 3 8 8 Mean 1.75 1.25 1.75 1.88 2.38 1.88 2.13 1.38 1.86 2.38 1.88 3.00 2.33 2.25 2.50

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 12 2/24/2006

Page 37: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HUMA Northwest

N 35 35 34 35 36 36 37 36 35 34 36 4 5 36 35 Mean 1.29 1.29 1.32 1.69 1.64 1.75 2.19 1.53 1.83 1.97 1.92 2.25 1.80 1.86 1.89

Southeast

N 28 28 28 28 29 28 28 29 26 26 25 10 10 29 27 Mean 1.32 1.43 1.25 1.89 2.00 1.79 1.96 1.45 1.77 1.69 1.92 2.50 2.60 1.93 2.07

Southwest

N 42 42 42 43 43 42 41 42 43 41 42 12 11 43 43 Mean 1.26 1.29 1.14 1.35 1.40 1.48 1.56 1.19 1.26 1.54 1.52 1.50 1.55 1.30 1.53

N 149 147 145 150 154 152 151 153 148 146 148 37 35 154 151 Mean 1.26 1.29 1.21 1.54 1.55 1.55 1.75 1.31 1.51 1.73 1.64 1.92 1.86 1.56 1.67

JAPN Central

N 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 22 22 7 7 22 22 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.00 1.05 1.14 1.09 1.14 1.05 1.14 1.27 1.32 1.43 1.43 1.05 1.05

Northwest

N 24 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 23 22 23 7 6 24 24 Mean 1.00 1.04 1.21 1.04 1.38 1.08 1.26 1.42 1.43 1.45 1.35 1.29 1.00 1.33 1.42

N 46 46 46 46 46 46 45 46 44 44 45 14 13 46 46 Mean 1.00 1.07 1.11 1.04 1.26 1.09 1.20 1.24 1.30 1.36 1.33 1.36 1.23 1.20 1.24

MATD Central

N 722 719 662 729 730 735 733 729 687 686 716 358 376 719 722 Mean 1.16 1.11 1.38 1.54 1.79 1.46 1.80 1.48 1.79 1.91 1.79 1.95 1.92 1.77 1.83

Northeast

N 564 556 510 563 562 560 553 560 548 528 548 211 215 560 561 Mean 1.10 1.10 1.41 1.32 1.55 1.32 1.55 1.28 1.52 1.74 1.55 1.69 1.70 1.48 1.47

Northwest

N 1017 1004 910 1027 1027 1028 1016 1020 995 967 1014 398 410 1026 1021 Mean 1.07 1.14 1.36 1.36 1.56 1.34 1.63 1.31 1.51 1.76 1.60 1.73 1.71 1.56 1.61

Southeast

N 610 584 569 609 616 614 613 613 597 577 599 270 263 613 605 Mean 1.08 1.25 1.31 1.50 1.54 1.42 1.60 1.32 1.53 1.90 1.61 1.78 1.87 1.55 1.54

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 13 2/24/2006

Page 38: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

MATD Southwest

N 1649 1647 1545 1697 1696 1692 1685 1688 1622 1584 1651 766 766 1681 1674 Mean 1.09 1.12 1.31 1.40 1.63 1.41 1.61 1.37 1.57 1.80 1.64 1.74 1.74 1.61 1.62

N 4562 4510 4196 4625 4631 4629 4600 4610 4449 4342 4528 2003 2030 4599 4583 Mean 1.10 1.14 1.34 1.42 1.62 1.39 1.64 1.36 1.58 1.82 1.64 1.78 1.78 1.60 1.62

MATH Central

N 563 556 480 571 569 565 563 565 544 545 560 158 155 563 558 Mean 1.14 1.19 1.48 1.65 1.98 1.61 1.84 1.53 1.87 1.82 1.81 1.88 1.94 1.86 2.05

Northeast

N 253 249 220 257 257 255 255 256 249 243 247 93 92 254 254 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.27 1.33 1.52 1.30 1.58 1.35 1.54 1.70 1.52 1.51 1.52 1.48 1.56

Northwest

N 1033 1015 840 1046 1046 1032 1033 1038 966 995 1019 263 254 1024 1024 Mean 1.09 1.15 1.37 1.49 1.74 1.45 1.77 1.44 1.65 1.73 1.60 1.77 1.79 1.72 1.80

Southeast

N 288 286 247 292 292 292 292 293 285 275 286 75 68 285 290 Mean 1.07 1.12 1.32 1.37 1.60 1.35 1.53 1.26 1.50 1.70 1.52 1.65 1.66 1.53 1.52

Southwest

N 1384 1350 1213 1412 1410 1405 1399 1406 1344 1349 1376 393 388 1396 1384 Mean 1.12 1.19 1.34 1.44 1.67 1.45 1.77 1.45 1.64 1.77 1.62 1.72 1.79 1.65 1.73

N 3521 3456 3000 3578 3574 3549 3542 3558 3388 3407 3488 982 957 3522 3510 Mean 1.11 1.17 1.36 1.47 1.72 1.46 1.75 1.44 1.66 1.75 1.63 1.73 1.78 1.68 1.77

MUAP Central

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 2.00

Northwest

N 49 40 44 36 50 50 46 50 50 46 46 12 13 50 49 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.11 1.08 1.06 1.15 1.02 1.06 1.17 1.04 1.08 1.00 1.04 1.00

Southwest

N 4 2 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.20

N 54 43 49 41 56 56 51 56 56 51 51 15 16 56 55

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 14 2/24/2006

Page 39: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.04 1.00 1.02 1.12 1.09 1.07 1.16 1.04 1.07 1.18 1.04 1.07 1.00 1.05 1.04

MUSI Central

N 92 82 87 91 93 92 90 93 92 86 87 31 38 91 92 Mean 1.05 1.37 1.09 1.14 1.22 1.17 1.40 1.23 1.25 1.30 1.22 1.32 1.21 1.27 1.25

Northwest

N 317 264 287 299 327 322 313 329 315 306 304 108 107 325 320 Mean 1.09 1.25 1.17 1.30 1.39 1.26 1.45 1.22 1.34 1.59 1.38 1.44 1.45 1.36 1.42

Southwest

N 71 67 68 70 72 69 71 70 67 65 70 28 28 70 70 Mean 1.04 1.16 1.12 1.31 1.28 1.29 1.44 1.19 1.34 1.42 1.34 1.46 1.43 1.47 1.36

N 480 413 442 460 492 483 474 492 474 457 461 167 173 486 482 Mean 1.08 1.26 1.14 1.27 1.34 1.25 1.44 1.22 1.32 1.51 1.34 1.42 1.39 1.36 1.38

PHED Central

N 111 91 106 112 114 114 105 114 111 105 106 59 56 113 115 Mean 1.09 1.18 1.22 1.36 1.19 1.32 1.45 1.24 1.45 1.66 1.46 1.31 1.38 1.28 1.23

Northeast

N 11 9 9 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 11 2 2 12 12 Mean 1.09 1.11 1.11 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00

Northwest

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 Mean 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.63 1.25 1.40 1.40 1.25 1.25

Southwest

N 52 36 48 48 52 49 52 52 49 46 46 32 29 51 51 Mean 1.04 1.19 1.10 1.08 1.10 1.18 1.15 1.06 1.16 1.50 1.20 1.16 1.21 1.08 1.08

N 182 144 171 180 186 183 177 186 180 171 171 98 92 184 186 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.18 1.26 1.16 1.26 1.32 1.17 1.33 1.57 1.35 1.26 1.32 1.21 1.17

PHIL Central

N 190 186 178 189 193 192 186 190 188 180 187 50 46 192 191 Mean 1.11 1.27 1.20 1.32 1.41 1.35 1.53 1.29 1.37 1.60 1.37 1.62 1.61 1.37 1.40

Northeast

N 12 11 11 12 12 12 12 12 11 12 12 5 5 12 10 Mean 1.08 1.00 1.18 1.08 1.33 1.17 1.33 1.08 1.27 1.67 1.42 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.40

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 15 2/24/2006

Page 40: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PHIL Northwest

N 96 96 86 96 97 98 93 98 91 90 96 21 20 97 97 Mean 1.17 1.14 1.24 1.36 1.46 1.31 1.49 1.17 1.26 1.52 1.52 1.43 1.45 1.30 1.49

Southeast

N 24 21 25 26 26 26 25 26 25 26 24 10 10 26 25 Mean 1.08 1.86 1.04 1.31 1.58 1.19 1.68 1.54 1.52 1.69 1.54 1.60 1.60 1.23 1.40

Southwest

N 164 160 126 165 165 159 165 163 156 160 163 26 25 164 164 Mean 1.09 1.21 1.34 1.27 1.33 1.33 1.54 1.28 1.36 1.74 1.45 1.73 1.76 1.34 1.44

N 486 474 426 488 493 487 481 489 471 468 482 112 106 491 487 Mean 1.11 1.24 1.24 1.30 1.40 1.32 1.53 1.27 1.35 1.64 1.44 1.59 1.59 1.33 1.43

PHYS Central

N 108 105 77 109 110 110 110 110 110 107 107 78 77 109 109 Mean 1.15 1.51 1.88 1.85 2.28 1.84 2.27 1.86 2.17 1.99 2.02 2.05 2.25 2.37 2.35

Northwest

N 145 126 132 138 146 145 146 147 139 139 143 112 111 146 139 Mean 1.13 1.34 1.44 1.61 2.27 1.63 2.20 1.50 1.84 1.81 1.96 1.73 1.78 1.99 2.25

Southeast

N 31 31 29 31 30 30 28 31 31 28 29 29 29 31 29 Mean 1.26 1.39 1.41 1.55 1.77 1.63 1.61 1.45 1.58 1.82 1.83 1.69 1.79 1.61 1.72

Southwest

N 180 171 150 179 182 181 180 181 172 178 176 139 138 181 181 Mean 1.12 1.25 1.45 1.58 2.05 1.68 1.98 1.63 1.80 1.87 1.75 1.79 1.72 1.91 2.09

N 464 433 388 457 468 466 464 469 452 452 455 358 355 467 458 Mean 1.14 1.35 1.53 1.65 2.16 1.70 2.10 1.63 1.89 1.88 1.88 1.82 1.86 2.02 2.18

PSYC Central

N 636 630 578 647 649 647 646 647 619 618 633 193 184 640 645 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.27 1.38 1.39 1.36 1.63 1.23 1.43 1.68 1.48 1.54 1.65 1.44 1.42

HS

N 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 13 4 4 13 13 Mean 1.00 1.08 1.23 1.38 1.15 1.31 1.92 1.08 1.23 1.42 1.38 2.25 2.25 1.23 1.15

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 16 2/24/2006

Page 41: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

PSYC Northeast

N 236 230 223 237 238 237 234 237 231 226 234 82 81 235 236 Mean 1.12 1.16 1.17 1.46 1.45 1.44 1.58 1.35 1.49 1.74 1.58 1.77 1.74 1.45 1.52

Northwest

N 755 745 716 766 769 765 760 755 732 732 758 173 162 766 761 Mean 1.07 1.17 1.19 1.40 1.50 1.40 1.71 1.32 1.50 1.72 1.54 1.76 1.85 1.55 1.52

Southeast

N 352 340 331 353 354 354 353 353 351 335 349 91 87 349 348 Mean 1.05 1.13 1.17 1.35 1.34 1.35 1.54 1.22 1.33 1.66 1.43 1.60 1.61 1.37 1.34

Southwest

N 1172 1150 1095 1186 1195 1172 1181 1193 1142 1124 1161 382 371 1183 1172 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.22 1.48 1.44 1.43 1.75 1.35 1.51 1.79 1.55 1.66 1.70 1.51 1.54

N 3164 3108 2956 3202 3218 3188 3187 3198 3088 3047 3148 925 889 3186 3175 Mean 1.07 1.13 1.21 1.43 1.43 1.40 1.68 1.30 1.47 1.73 1.52 1.66 1.71 1.48 1.49

SOCI Central

N 181 181 171 182 182 182 181 180 175 168 177 60 61 176 180 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.20 1.38 1.47 1.46 1.70 1.26 1.51 1.75 1.54 1.58 1.64 1.45 1.52

Northeast

N 92 91 86 92 92 92 92 91 87 91 91 29 29 92 90 Mean 1.04 1.15 1.08 1.37 1.32 1.22 1.39 1.20 1.36 1.66 1.47 1.28 1.31 1.34 1.32

Northwest

N 358 354 327 374 372 368 370 371 350 364 360 103 98 371 368 Mean 1.11 1.16 1.33 1.54 1.74 1.57 1.74 1.44 1.62 1.79 1.63 1.76 1.74 1.53 1.55

Southeast

N 166 164 149 167 168 168 166 167 162 156 163 51 49 168 168 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.32 1.52 1.61 1.48 1.63 1.36 1.57 1.83 1.62 1.73 1.69 1.55 1.58

Southwest

N 589 579 548 576 603 600 577 599 568 544 559 147 140 589 596 Mean 1.08 1.21 1.30 1.59 1.50 1.52 1.86 1.29 1.49 1.84 1.64 1.69 1.76 1.64 1.59

N 1386 1369 1281 1391 1417 1410 1386 1408 1342 1323 1350 390 377 1396 1402 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.28 1.53 1.56 1.50 1.75 1.33 1.53 1.80 1.61 1.67 1.69 1.56 1.55

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 17 2/24/2006

Page 42: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

SPAN Central

N 192 191 184 192 192 192 191 192 181 185 189 92 99 193 191 Mean 1.05 1.10 1.17 1.23 1.44 1.20 1.44 1.22 1.48 1.45 1.41 1.68 1.52 1.32 1.43

Northeast

N 39 38 38 39 38 39 39 39 36 36 38 19 23 39 38 Mean 1.03 1.00 1.03 1.23 1.39 1.23 1.46 1.18 1.31 1.86 1.34 1.37 1.30 1.31 1.39

Northwest

N 209 205 191 210 211 212 209 212 197 202 206 74 104 211 211 Mean 1.09 1.08 1.18 1.34 1.63 1.37 1.59 1.37 1.53 1.82 1.40 1.93 1.69 1.42 1.55

Southeast

N 65 64 61 66 66 66 66 66 65 61 65 32 33 66 65 Mean 1.03 1.06 1.13 1.26 1.47 1.30 1.44 1.14 1.26 1.69 1.31 1.34 1.30 1.21 1.18

Southwest

N 234 232 225 231 232 232 231 229 218 226 228 61 69 230 229 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.22 1.41 1.60 1.36 1.71 1.37 1.57 1.65 1.46 1.82 1.77 1.40 1.52

N 739 730 699 738 739 741 736 738 697 710 726 278 328 739 734 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.18 1.32 1.54 1.31 1.57 1.30 1.49 1.66 1.41 1.72 1.59 1.36 1.47

SPCH Central

N 269 263 250 260 273 270 266 271 268 255 261 86 77 273 272 Mean 1.11 1.22 1.23 1.42 1.37 1.36 1.51 1.42 1.49 1.73 1.51 1.55 1.64 1.36 1.50

Northeast

N 168 167 156 165 169 169 166 169 166 158 168 42 39 169 167 Mean 1.03 1.14 1.13 1.42 1.21 1.26 1.48 1.18 1.40 1.70 1.46 1.48 1.51 1.33 1.22

Northwest

N 271 236 243 253 281 277 267 277 270 265 272 71 69 278 278 Mean 1.23 1.28 1.24 1.52 1.39 1.41 1.59 1.51 1.51 1.75 1.56 1.54 1.55 1.42 1.53

Southeast

N 117 117 110 113 117 117 118 118 116 113 115 32 31 117 118 Mean 1.07 1.04 1.18 1.23 1.20 1.22 1.28 1.17 1.28 1.62 1.26 1.38 1.39 1.19 1.18

Southwest

N 260 262 234 265 268 263 257 266 257 251 255 71 68 265 265 Mean 1.13 1.13 1.21 1.40 1.37 1.32 1.51 1.32 1.45 1.59 1.54 1.58 1.63 1.40 1.43

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 18 2/24/2006

Page 43: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 ACADEMIC SUBJECTS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 1085 1045 993 1056 1108 1096 1074 1101 1077 1042 1071 302 284 1102 1100 Mean 1.13 1.18 1.21 1.42 1.33 1.33 1.50 1.35 1.45 1.68 1.49 1.52 1.57 1.36 1.41

TECA Central

N 60 56 55 61 59 60 59 59 57 60 58 22 22 60 57 Mean 1.08 1.21 1.16 1.61 1.59 1.62 1.93 1.53 1.60 1.88 1.67 2.09 2.05 1.60 1.70

Northeast

N 30 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 11 11 30 29 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.23 1.20 1.27 1.17 1.17 1.34 1.40 1.36 1.27 1.13 1.14

Northwest

N 103 103 99 102 106 104 104 105 98 102 104 20 19 105 106 Mean 1.09 1.07 1.11 1.51 1.37 1.46 1.64 1.26 1.41 1.65 1.48 1.75 1.68 1.45 1.57

Southeast

N 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 23 24 7 6 25 23 Mean 1.38 1.24 1.72 2.28 2.28 2.20 2.12 1.56 1.72 2.13 1.92 1.43 1.00 2.00 2.35

Southwest

N 94 93 87 94 94 94 93 91 89 85 91 27 24 91 91 Mean 1.20 1.27 1.43 1.66 1.86 1.71 1.74 1.56 1.66 1.95 1.62 1.70 1.75 1.65 2.02

N 311 306 295 312 314 313 311 310 299 299 307 87 82 311 306 Mean 1.14 1.16 1.25 1.61 1.62 1.60 1.73 1.41 1.52 1.79 1.58 1.75 1.70 1.55 1.75

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_ACAD.spo 19 2/24/2006

Page 44: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ACCT Central

N 102 103 89 103 105 105 103 105 102 100 101 45 44 103 100 Mean 1.10 1.12 1.30 1.45 1.78 1.53 1.78 1.33 1.57 1.84 1.57 1.80 1.82 1.78 1.85

Northeast

N 39 39 37 40 40 40 39 40 37 40 40 13 13 39 39 Mean 1.44 1.31 1.43 2.08 2.45 1.93 2.36 1.65 1.89 2.05 2.03 2.23 2.15 2.05 2.41

Northwest

N 131 130 121 137 137 135 134 136 134 129 135 30 28 136 134 Mean 1.07 1.16 1.31 1.48 1.56 1.43 1.90 1.31 1.59 1.70 1.65 1.63 1.79 1.61 1.65

Southeast

N 48 48 43 48 48 48 49 49 45 46 48 14 12 49 49 Mean 1.02 1.06 1.37 1.33 1.38 1.23 1.61 1.16 1.40 1.46 1.29 1.71 1.58 1.37 1.35

Southwest

N 344 342 303 350 349 347 347 349 335 338 341 115 115 346 343 Mean 1.14 1.18 1.40 1.61 1.65 1.55 1.87 1.36 1.56 1.71 1.65 1.83 1.87 1.66 1.77

N 664 662 593 678 679 675 672 679 653 653 665 217 212 673 665 Mean 1.13 1.16 1.36 1.56 1.68 1.52 1.87 1.35 1.58 1.73 1.64 1.81 1.85 1.67 1.76

ACNT Central

N 94 89 84 93 95 94 95 94 89 91 94 30 30 94 93 Mean 1.02 1.16 1.25 1.45 1.55 1.37 1.72 1.26 1.40 1.51 1.48 1.70 1.53 1.51 1.55

Northeast

N 7 6 4 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 0 0 7 7 Mean 1.29 1.17 1.75 2.43 2.86 1.71 2.50 2.14 2.57 2.86 1.71 . . 2.71 2.71

Northwest

N 69 68 59 68 69 69 69 68 67 68 69 23 23 68 69 Mean 1.14 1.47 1.42 1.54 1.72 1.52 1.74 1.56 1.69 1.68 1.45 1.52 1.57 1.79 1.84

Southeast

N 25 25 25 25 25 26 25 25 25 24 25 10 10 25 25 Mean 1.12 1.12 1.24 1.36 1.68 1.35 1.72 1.16 1.64 1.83 1.68 1.80 1.60 1.60 1.68

Southwest

N 223 218 201 225 225 228 225 228 214 216 224 82 80 222 221 Mean 1.10 1.22 1.36 1.60 1.72 1.58 1.76 1.49 1.69 1.66 1.74 1.99 2.01 1.57 1.69

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 1 2/24/2006

Page 45: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 418 406 373 418 421 424 420 422 402 406 419 145 143 416 415 Mean 1.10 1.24 1.34 1.56 1.70 1.51 1.76 1.44 1.64 1.66 1.63 1.84 1.81 1.61 1.70

ARTC Southwest

N 181 132 169 150 185 184 171 183 169 168 178 93 99 184 182 Mean 1.08 1.36 1.21 1.59 1.72 1.45 1.70 1.46 1.72 1.81 1.79 1.80 1.61 1.57 1.74

N 181 132 169 150 185 184 171 183 169 168 178 93 99 184 182 Mean 1.08 1.36 1.21 1.59 1.72 1.45 1.70 1.46 1.72 1.81 1.79 1.80 1.61 1.57 1.74

AUMT Northeast

N 274 280 277 282 284 281 275 283 282 273 271 277 274 282 281 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.16 1.40 1.43 1.34 1.48 1.29 1.38 1.84 1.45 1.39 1.45 1.49 1.44

N 274 280 277 282 284 281 275 283 282 273 271 277 274 282 281 Mean 1.08 1.13 1.16 1.40 1.43 1.34 1.48 1.29 1.38 1.84 1.45 1.39 1.45 1.49 1.44

BCIS Central

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 11 10 6 7 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.55 1.73 1.27 1.73 1.55 1.70 1.73 1.60 2.00 2.00 1.73 1.82

Northwest

N 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 27 27 25 19 19 28 28 Mean 1.04 1.25 1.11 1.39 1.46 1.43 1.61 1.43 1.56 1.56 1.80 1.53 1.47 1.71 1.64

N 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 37 38 35 25 26 39 39 Mean 1.03 1.18 1.08 1.44 1.54 1.38 1.64 1.46 1.59 1.61 1.74 1.64 1.62 1.72 1.69

BIOM Central

N 9 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 7 10 10 Mean 1.22 1.33 1.38 1.50 1.70 1.70 1.80 1.40 1.70 1.80 1.40 1.43 1.71 1.50 1.40

N 9 9 8 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 7 10 10 Mean 1.22 1.33 1.38 1.50 1.70 1.70 1.80 1.40 1.70 1.80 1.40 1.43 1.71 1.50 1.40

BITC Northeast

N 11 11 9 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 9 5 5 12 12 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.67 1.45 1.42 1.25 1.36 1.25 1.33 1.36 1.44 1.60 1.60 1.33 1.17

N 11 11 9 11 12 12 11 12 12 11 9 5 5 12 12 Mean 1.09 1.09 1.67 1.45 1.42 1.25 1.36 1.25 1.33 1.36 1.44 1.60 1.60 1.33 1.17

BMGT Central

N 51 50 41 53 53 53 52 53 53 51 50 23 23 52 53 Mean 1.20 1.06 1.41 1.60 1.49 1.43 1.71 1.42 1.32 1.51 1.42 1.78 1.52 1.44 1.62

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 2 2/24/2006

Page 46: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

BMGT Northeast

N 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 19 4 5 20 20 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.15 1.35 1.20 1.15 1.40 1.15 1.35 1.45 1.42 1.25 1.20 1.30 1.40

Northwest

N 23 22 22 24 24 24 24 24 22 23 24 5 5 24 24 Mean 1.00 1.05 1.14 1.08 1.08 1.13 1.33 1.08 1.14 1.61 1.21 1.40 1.40 1.13 1.13

Southeast

N 24 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 24 22 24 6 5 24 24 Mean 1.00 1.04 1.17 1.25 1.38 1.17 1.52 1.21 1.50 2.00 1.54 2.00 2.40 1.46 1.33

Southwest

N 74 70 60 77 77 77 77 77 77 75 77 30 29 76 76 Mean 1.05 1.14 1.22 1.47 1.47 1.36 1.61 1.40 1.58 1.84 1.51 1.53 1.52 1.53 1.54

N 192 186 167 198 198 198 196 198 196 191 194 68 67 196 197 Mean 1.07 1.08 1.24 1.42 1.39 1.31 1.57 1.32 1.43 1.70 1.44 1.63 1.55 1.42 1.47

BUSG Central

N 65 62 53 63 65 65 65 65 63 63 64 22 22 64 65 Mean 1.03 1.02 1.25 1.25 1.29 1.23 1.42 1.12 1.30 1.54 1.36 1.41 1.41 1.39 1.34

Northeast

N 34 32 32 33 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 7 7 34 33 Mean 1.00 1.06 1.28 1.24 1.21 1.21 1.24 1.06 1.18 1.24 1.26 1.43 1.29 1.24 1.33

Northwest

N 62 55 54 62 62 61 61 62 62 61 61 17 17 61 60 Mean 1.05 1.24 1.28 1.44 1.42 1.44 1.62 1.24 1.52 1.70 1.49 1.82 1.76 1.56 1.48

Southeast

N 31 31 29 31 31 31 31 31 31 30 31 5 5 31 31 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.23 1.23 1.26 1.71 1.13 1.39 1.97 1.61 2.00 2.40 1.39 1.35

Southwest

N 69 67 63 74 73 72 73 73 72 69 74 22 21 72 73 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.32 1.68 1.63 1.64 1.92 1.56 1.71 1.96 1.57 2.18 2.33 1.68 1.73

N 261 247 231 263 265 263 264 265 262 257 264 73 72 262 262 Mean 1.06 1.11 1.26 1.41 1.40 1.39 1.61 1.26 1.46 1.70 1.47 1.78 1.82 1.49 1.48

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 3 2/24/2006

Page 47: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CDEC Central

N 91 88 88 91 92 92 90 92 91 89 90 72 72 92 90 Mean 1.12 1.22 1.17 1.48 1.54 1.41 1.61 1.74 1.70 1.78 1.77 1.76 1.79 1.65 1.86

Southwest

N 30 28 27 28 29 29 28 29 29 29 29 20 18 31 30 Mean 1.20 1.29 1.33 1.89 1.52 1.52 1.71 1.41 1.69 1.90 1.59 1.60 1.72 1.52 1.67

N 121 116 115 119 121 121 118 121 120 118 119 92 90 123 120 Mean 1.14 1.23 1.21 1.58 1.54 1.44 1.64 1.66 1.70 1.81 1.72 1.73 1.78 1.62 1.81

CETT Central

N 67 67 65 68 69 69 68 69 67 60 67 65 65 68 67 Mean 1.04 1.15 1.31 1.35 1.41 1.33 1.50 1.28 1.37 1.83 1.54 1.52 1.42 1.47 1.42

N 67 67 65 68 69 69 68 69 67 60 67 65 65 68 67 Mean 1.04 1.15 1.31 1.35 1.41 1.33 1.50 1.28 1.37 1.83 1.54 1.52 1.42 1.47 1.42

CHEF Central

N 237 223 228 243 246 247 241 246 236 241 238 200 197 245 246 Mean 1.06 1.19 1.16 1.32 1.30 1.35 1.55 1.28 1.43 1.51 1.47 1.35 1.40 1.38 1.32

N 237 223 228 243 246 247 241 246 236 241 238 200 197 245 246 Mean 1.06 1.19 1.16 1.32 1.30 1.35 1.55 1.28 1.43 1.51 1.47 1.35 1.40 1.38 1.32

CJLE Northeast

N 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 18 17 2 2 18 18 Mean 1.22 1.06 1.39 1.83 2.78 1.83 2.00 1.50 1.76 2.06 1.76 2.00 2.00 1.83 2.39

N 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 18 17 2 2 18 18 Mean 1.22 1.06 1.39 1.83 2.78 1.83 2.00 1.50 1.76 2.06 1.76 2.00 2.00 1.83 2.39

CMSW HS

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 8 8 11 10 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.27 1.18 1.27 1.27 1.18 1.27 1.55 1.27 1.25 1.25 1.18 1.10

N 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 8 8 11 10 Mean 1.00 1.09 1.09 1.27 1.18 1.27 1.27 1.18 1.27 1.55 1.27 1.25 1.25 1.18 1.10

CNBT Central

N 60 58 59 61 62 61 57 60 61 58 57 40 38 62 61 Mean 1.10 1.24 1.17 1.38 1.29 1.33 1.47 1.22 1.30 1.38 1.37 1.40 1.50 1.34 1.36

N 60 58 59 61 62 61 57 60 61 58 57 40 38 62 61 Mean 1.10 1.24 1.17 1.38 1.29 1.33 1.47 1.22 1.30 1.38 1.37 1.40 1.50 1.34 1.36

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 4 2/24/2006

Page 48: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CPMT Central

N 51 51 50 52 52 51 51 52 52 51 51 46 46 52 51 Mean 1.10 1.06 1.12 1.35 1.44 1.29 1.33 1.21 1.35 1.33 1.33 1.46 1.41 1.33 1.35

Northeast

N 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17

Northwest

N 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 Mean 1.33 1.50 1.67 2.33 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.00 2.50 2.33 2.50 2.25 2.25 2.25 2.25

N 60 59 59 61 62 61 61 62 62 60 61 56 56 62 61 Mean 1.10 1.07 1.15 1.38 1.47 1.34 1.36 1.24 1.40 1.35 1.39 1.48 1.45 1.37 1.39

CRPT Central

N 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 Mean 1.13 1.22 1.00 1.56 1.11 1.33 1.56 1.11 1.33 1.89 1.33 1.11 1.44 1.00 1.25

N 8 9 8 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 8 Mean 1.13 1.22 1.00 1.56 1.11 1.33 1.56 1.11 1.33 1.89 1.33 1.11 1.44 1.00 1.25

CRTG Southwest

N 21 20 21 20 21 21 20 21 19 21 21 15 18 21 21 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.14 1.50 1.52 1.48 1.65 1.14 1.37 1.43 1.81 1.47 1.39 1.33 1.48

N 21 20 21 20 21 21 20 21 19 21 21 15 18 21 21 Mean 1.10 1.15 1.14 1.50 1.52 1.48 1.65 1.14 1.37 1.43 1.81 1.47 1.39 1.33 1.48

CSIR Central

N 5 1 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.20

N 5 1 5 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.20

CSME Central

N 174 168 164 175 176 175 173 175 174 170 173 172 172 175 174 Mean 1.19 1.18 1.38 1.72 1.76 1.63 1.80 1.41 1.56 1.74 1.98 1.63 1.76 1.75 1.93

Northeast

N 93 93 93 94 93 91 93 93 91 89 93 94 94 94 93 Mean 1.09 1.13 1.16 1.31 1.48 1.48 1.31 1.19 1.33 1.72 1.40 1.24 1.35 1.33 1.27

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 5 2/24/2006

Page 49: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

CSME Northwest

N 170 169 169 171 168 169 169 166 167 170 167 167 166 171 169 Mean 1.26 1.29 1.38 1.70 1.88 1.67 1.81 1.78 1.83 1.95 1.85 1.63 1.93 1.84 2.01

N 437 430 426 440 437 435 435 434 432 429 433 433 432 440 436 Mean 1.20 1.21 1.34 1.62 1.75 1.62 1.70 1.50 1.62 1.82 1.81 1.55 1.73 1.70 1.82

CTEC Northeast

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 Mean 1.25 1.50 1.38 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.00 1.00

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5 5 8 8 Mean 1.25 1.50 1.38 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.00 1.00

CVTT HS

N 71 70 69 73 73 73 73 73 73 72 73 68 68 73 73 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.07 1.23 1.30 1.18 1.33 1.15 1.23 1.25 1.21 1.32 1.35 1.23 1.34

N 71 70 69 73 73 73 73 73 73 72 73 68 68 73 73 Mean 1.07 1.11 1.07 1.23 1.30 1.18 1.33 1.15 1.23 1.25 1.21 1.32 1.35 1.23 1.34

DAAC HS

N 74 72 71 76 77 77 77 78 77 73 78 42 43 75 74 Mean 1.09 1.28 1.30 1.84 1.55 1.53 2.00 1.40 1.53 1.67 1.95 1.52 1.51 1.53 1.62

N 74 72 71 76 77 77 77 78 77 73 78 42 43 75 74 Mean 1.09 1.28 1.30 1.84 1.55 1.53 2.00 1.40 1.53 1.67 1.95 1.52 1.51 1.53 1.62

DEMR Northeast

N 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 . . 1.00 1.00

N 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0 2 2 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 . . 1.00 1.00

DFTG Central

N 32 29 29 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 24 26 32 32 Mean 1.06 1.28 1.10 1.25 1.63 1.19 1.28 1.63 1.47 1.59 1.25 1.50 1.54 1.41 1.53

Northeast

N 88 72 78 89 92 92 90 92 88 86 91 35 43 91 92 Mean 1.15 1.43 1.15 1.53 1.61 1.47 1.77 1.39 1.49 1.81 1.57 1.80 1.70 1.48 1.60

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 6 2/24/2006

Page 50: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

DFTG Northwest

N 38 38 37 35 38 38 33 37 36 31 35 23 26 38 38 Mean 1.08 1.39 1.24 1.49 1.66 1.37 1.52 1.35 1.39 1.77 1.63 1.78 1.54 1.55 1.47

Southeast

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.50 1.50 1.75 1.25 1.25 2.00 1.50 2.00 1.75 1.25 1.00

Southwest

N 90 92 88 96 94 96 96 95 95 94 94 59 65 93 94 Mean 1.12 1.12 1.27 1.38 1.50 1.43 1.52 1.35 1.57 1.59 1.44 1.56 1.54 1.56 1.51

N 252 235 236 256 260 262 255 260 255 247 256 144 164 258 260 Mean 1.12 1.28 1.21 1.43 1.58 1.40 1.58 1.40 1.50 1.70 1.49 1.65 1.59 1.51 1.53

DMSO HS

N 91 89 89 89 90 90 89 90 89 87 90 83 83 89 88 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.13 1.44 1.51 1.50 1.56 1.41 1.43 1.60 1.41 1.47 1.41 1.49 1.44

N 91 89 89 89 90 90 89 90 89 87 90 83 83 89 88 Mean 1.12 1.15 1.13 1.44 1.51 1.50 1.56 1.41 1.43 1.60 1.41 1.47 1.41 1.49 1.44

DNTA HS

N 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 35 36 70 69 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.07 1.21 1.26 1.26 1.49 1.24 1.30 1.33 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.24 1.20

N 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 70 35 36 70 69 Mean 1.07 1.10 1.07 1.21 1.26 1.26 1.49 1.24 1.30 1.33 1.29 1.29 1.28 1.24 1.20

ELMT Central

N 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.45 1.27 1.45 1.18 1.45 1.09 1.27 1.36 1.45 1.20 1.10 1.27 1.18

N 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 10 10 11 11 Mean 1.00 1.10 1.45 1.27 1.45 1.18 1.45 1.09 1.27 1.36 1.45 1.20 1.10 1.27 1.18

ELPT Central

N 83 94 89 95 95 95 95 95 93 88 93 82 79 93 93 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.25 1.36 1.54 1.37 1.54 1.24 1.32 1.59 1.53 1.51 1.62 1.57 1.52

N 83 94 89 95 95 95 95 95 93 88 93 82 79 93 93 Mean 1.06 1.13 1.25 1.36 1.54 1.37 1.54 1.24 1.32 1.59 1.53 1.51 1.62 1.57 1.52

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 7 2/24/2006

Page 51: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

EMSP HS

N 37 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 36 36 36 17 16 37 37 Mean 1.03 1.33 1.14 1.22 1.19 1.19 1.51 1.14 1.17 1.47 1.36 1.06 1.13 1.30 1.11

N 37 36 37 37 37 37 37 37 36 36 36 17 16 37 37 Mean 1.03 1.33 1.14 1.22 1.19 1.19 1.51 1.14 1.17 1.47 1.36 1.06 1.13 1.30 1.11

ENTC Central

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 . . 2.00 2.00

N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 . . 2.00 2.00

ETWR Southwest

N 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 7 7 Mean 1.29 1.00 1.29 1.33 1.86 1.43 2.00 1.29 1.50 1.33 2.00 1.20 1.40 1.43 1.86

N 7 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 7 7 Mean 1.29 1.00 1.29 1.33 1.86 1.43 2.00 1.29 1.50 1.33 2.00 1.20 1.40 1.43 1.86

FIRT Northeast

N 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00

N 12 12 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 9 9 12 12 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00

FITT Central

N 29 23 29 29 31 31 30 31 31 31 29 24 22 31 30 Mean 1.07 1.17 1.10 1.21 1.26 1.23 1.40 1.06 1.16 1.48 1.14 1.25 1.27 1.06 1.20

N 29 23 29 29 31 31 30 31 31 31 29 24 22 31 30 Mean 1.07 1.17 1.10 1.21 1.26 1.23 1.40 1.06 1.16 1.48 1.14 1.25 1.27 1.06 1.20

FLMC Northwest

N 77 75 76 81 82 82 81 81 81 77 80 49 47 80 81 Mean 1.05 1.13 1.20 1.25 1.38 1.32 1.44 1.21 1.32 1.53 1.36 1.20 1.21 1.26 1.28

N 77 75 76 81 82 82 81 81 81 77 80 49 47 80 81 Mean 1.05 1.13 1.20 1.25 1.38 1.32 1.44 1.21 1.32 1.53 1.36 1.20 1.21 1.26 1.28

FSHD Central

N 211 176 191 194 213 211 201 212 205 195 202 116 124 211 212 Mean 1.08 1.27 1.14 1.41 1.42 1.31 1.45 1.26 1.32 1.57 1.47 1.34 1.34 1.31 1.32

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 8 2/24/2006

Page 52: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 211 176 191 194 213 211 201 212 205 195 202 116 124 211 212 Mean 1.08 1.27 1.14 1.41 1.42 1.31 1.45 1.26 1.32 1.57 1.47 1.34 1.34 1.31 1.32

FSHN Central

N 68 65 62 70 71 71 70 70 67 70 69 27 25 69 71 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.16 1.17 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.17 1.15 1.43 1.20 1.33 1.36 1.10 1.07

N 68 65 62 70 71 71 70 70 67 70 69 27 25 69 71 Mean 1.06 1.08 1.16 1.17 1.13 1.15 1.21 1.17 1.15 1.43 1.20 1.33 1.36 1.10 1.07

GAME Southwest

N 29 30 30 30 30 30 29 29 28 23 29 16 19 30 30 Mean 1.41 1.50 1.57 2.47 2.23 2.40 2.97 2.00 1.89 2.09 2.69 1.94 2.63 2.37 2.53

N 29 30 30 30 30 30 29 29 28 23 29 16 19 30 30 Mean 1.41 1.50 1.57 2.47 2.23 2.40 2.97 2.00 1.89 2.09 2.69 1.94 2.63 2.37 2.53

GERS HS

N 18 17 18 17 18 18 17 18 18 16 17 16 16 18 18 Mean 1.22 1.24 1.33 1.41 1.22 1.44 2.00 1.17 1.61 1.69 1.41 1.44 1.44 1.17 1.11

N 18 17 18 17 18 18 17 18 18 16 17 16 16 18 18 Mean 1.22 1.24 1.33 1.41 1.22 1.44 2.00 1.17 1.61 1.69 1.41 1.44 1.44 1.17 1.11

GRPH Southwest

N 18 17 18 17 18 18 17 18 18 17 17 10 10 18 18 Mean 1.17 1.24 1.00 1.47 1.33 1.17 1.35 1.17 1.33 1.59 1.94 1.30 1.20 1.22 1.11

N 18 17 18 17 18 18 17 18 18 17 17 10 10 18 18 Mean 1.17 1.24 1.00 1.47 1.33 1.17 1.35 1.17 1.33 1.59 1.94 1.30 1.20 1.22 1.11

HALT Northwest

N 42 42 38 39 41 41 36 42 40 34 34 23 25 43 42 Mean 1.17 1.14 1.11 1.28 1.29 1.27 1.31 1.12 1.20 1.18 1.32 1.26 1.32 1.26 1.33

N 42 42 38 39 41 41 36 42 40 34 34 23 25 43 42 Mean 1.17 1.14 1.11 1.28 1.29 1.27 1.31 1.12 1.20 1.18 1.32 1.26 1.32 1.26 1.33

HAMG Central

N 52 51 48 54 54 54 54 54 51 53 54 20 19 54 53 Mean 1.10 1.04 1.17 1.30 1.52 1.39 1.41 1.19 1.31 1.64 1.33 1.40 1.53 1.35 1.40

N 52 51 48 54 54 54 54 54 51 53 54 20 19 54 53 Mean 1.10 1.04 1.17 1.30 1.52 1.39 1.41 1.19 1.31 1.64 1.33 1.40 1.53 1.35 1.40

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 9 2/24/2006

Page 53: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HART Central

N 118 112 115 122 122 122 122 122 121 118 121 119 119 122 120 Mean 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.35 1.25 1.33 1.39 1.22 1.22 1.42 1.40 1.24 1.32 1.24 1.20

Southwest

N 104 104 102 108 108 109 109 107 109 109 108 108 108 106 107 Mean 1.23 1.14 1.16 1.48 1.71 1.50 1.59 1.57 1.61 1.73 1.64 1.43 1.43 1.51 1.53

N 222 216 217 230 230 231 231 229 230 227 229 227 227 228 227 Mean 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.41 1.47 1.41 1.48 1.38 1.40 1.57 1.51 1.33 1.37 1.36 1.36

HITT HS

N 105 96 97 103 106 106 102 106 102 99 101 45 40 106 104 Mean 1.14 1.20 1.25 1.50 1.59 1.58 1.73 1.43 1.69 1.72 1.65 1.78 1.73 1.56 1.58

N 105 96 97 103 106 106 102 106 102 99 101 45 40 106 104 Mean 1.14 1.20 1.25 1.50 1.59 1.58 1.73 1.43 1.69 1.72 1.65 1.78 1.73 1.56 1.58

HLAB HS

N 21 21 20 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 17 16 22 22 Mean 1.00 1.24 1.15 1.41 1.50 1.55 1.68 1.36 1.45 1.55 1.32 1.41 1.50 1.41 1.50

N 21 21 20 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 17 16 22 22 Mean 1.00 1.24 1.15 1.41 1.50 1.55 1.68 1.36 1.45 1.55 1.32 1.41 1.50 1.41 1.50

HPRS HS

N 72 72 69 72 72 71 71 72 71 69 72 39 38 71 71 Mean 1.01 1.11 1.14 1.25 1.14 1.25 1.41 1.14 1.24 1.51 1.31 1.41 1.47 1.24 1.20

N 72 72 69 72 72 71 71 72 71 69 72 39 38 71 71 Mean 1.01 1.11 1.14 1.25 1.14 1.25 1.41 1.14 1.24 1.51 1.31 1.41 1.47 1.24 1.20

HRPO Central

N 41 41 40 41 41 41 40 41 41 36 41 17 17 41 41 Mean 1.07 1.29 1.50 1.44 1.46 1.56 1.70 1.34 1.49 1.56 1.71 1.94 1.88 1.46 1.41

Northeast

N 21 21 19 21 21 21 21 21 20 20 21 4 4 20 19 Mean 1.05 1.14 1.05 1.33 1.24 1.24 1.38 1.19 1.30 1.60 1.33 1.25 1.25 1.40 1.21

Northwest

N 57 55 54 57 58 55 55 56 54 52 54 17 14 57 58 Mean 1.05 1.22 1.20 1.32 1.21 1.35 1.60 1.14 1.33 2.06 1.28 1.53 1.64 1.32 1.31

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 10 2/24/2006

Page 54: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

HRPO Southeast

N 18 18 17 18 18 18 18 18 16 17 18 5 5 17 17 Mean 1.00 1.06 1.06 1.22 1.22 1.17 1.33 1.17 1.44 1.76 1.28 1.40 1.40 1.35 1.35

Southwest

N 14 13 13 14 14 14 14 14 13 14 14 4 4 14 14 Mean 1.07 1.46 1.15 1.43 1.43 1.43 2.00 1.36 1.46 1.79 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.43

N 151 148 143 151 152 149 148 150 144 139 148 47 44 149 149 Mean 1.05 1.23 1.24 1.35 1.30 1.38 1.60 1.23 1.40 1.80 1.43 1.64 1.66 1.39 1.34

IBUS Central

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.38 1.00 1.38 1.13 1.13 1.25 1.25 1.25 2.00 2.00 1.38 1.38

Northwest

N 23 22 23 23 23 23 22 22 22 19 23 8 8 23 23 Mean 1.00 1.05 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.41 1.00 1.05 1.84 1.00 1.38 1.38 1.00 1.00

N 31 30 31 31 31 31 30 30 30 27 31 12 12 31 31 Mean 1.00 1.03 1.10 1.10 1.00 1.32 1.33 1.03 1.10 1.67 1.06 1.58 1.58 1.10 1.10

IMED Southwest

N 88 84 85 80 88 87 82 88 84 78 80 63 71 88 88 Mean 1.08 1.29 1.27 1.56 1.72 1.36 1.72 1.36 1.61 1.59 1.69 1.71 1.49 1.52 1.49

N 88 84 85 80 88 87 82 88 84 78 80 63 71 88 88 Mean 1.08 1.29 1.27 1.56 1.72 1.36 1.72 1.36 1.61 1.59 1.69 1.71 1.49 1.52 1.49

INDS Central

N 171 114 154 146 172 170 167 171 164 168 170 67 90 171 170 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.18 1.42 1.65 1.35 1.52 1.32 1.33 1.51 1.49 1.69 1.44 1.44 1.51

N 171 114 154 146 172 170 167 171 164 168 170 67 90 171 170 Mean 1.16 1.18 1.18 1.42 1.65 1.35 1.52 1.32 1.33 1.51 1.49 1.69 1.44 1.44 1.51

INEW Central

N 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.14 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.75 1.25 1.75 1.38 1.50 1.43 1.29 1.50 1.88

N 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.50 1.14 1.38 1.38 1.38 1.75 1.25 1.75 1.38 1.50 1.43 1.29 1.50 1.88

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 11 2/24/2006

Page 55: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

INMT Central

N 53 53 49 56 56 56 55 56 56 56 56 20 20 56 56 Mean 1.00 1.02 1.10 1.30 1.34 1.34 1.36 1.36 1.34 1.34 1.20 1.15 1.20 1.34 1.34

N 53 53 49 56 56 56 55 56 56 56 56 20 20 56 56 Mean 1.00 1.02 1.10 1.30 1.34 1.34 1.36 1.36 1.34 1.34 1.20 1.15 1.20 1.34 1.34

ITCC Central

N 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 7 8 6 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.14 1.25 1.13 1.63 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.25 1.17

N 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 7 7 6 7 8 6 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.00 1.14 1.25 1.13 1.63 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.14 1.25 1.17

ITMC Central

N 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 8 9 9 7 8 9 9 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.13 1.33 1.22 1.22 2.11 1.11 1.13 1.33 1.56 1.43 1.25 1.44 1.33

Southwest

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 6 8 10 10 Mean 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.33 1.50 1.40 1.40

N 18 18 18 19 19 19 19 19 18 19 17 13 16 19 19 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.17 1.37 1.32 1.32 1.74 1.26 1.28 1.37 1.53 1.38 1.38 1.42 1.37

ITNW Central

N 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 7 9 9 9 Mean 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.89 1.56 1.44 2.56 1.44 1.56 1.44 1.44 1.86 1.56 1.67 1.67

Northwest

N 7 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 7 4 4 7 7 Mean 1.14 1.29 1.00 1.14 1.57 1.71 2.00 1.14 1.33 1.29 1.14 1.75 2.25 1.43 1.29

Southwest

N 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 7 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.13 1.38 1.50 1.38 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.38 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.14

N 24 23 23 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 24 14 16 24 23 Mean 1.08 1.17 1.09 1.50 1.54 1.50 1.96 1.25 1.35 1.38 1.33 1.64 1.63 1.46 1.39

ITSC Central

N 68 66 62 68 69 68 69 67 64 67 68 38 37 68 67 Mean 1.18 1.21 1.26 1.71 2.00 1.54 1.78 1.88 1.92 1.75 1.94 1.82 1.73 1.87 1.97

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 12 2/24/2006

Page 56: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

ITSC Northeast

N 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 2 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.75 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00

Northwest

N 32 32 32 33 33 33 33 33 33 32 33 18 21 33 33 Mean 1.09 1.13 1.16 1.42 1.45 1.42 1.64 1.39 1.61 1.59 1.70 1.33 1.43 1.52 1.52

Southeast

N 23 23 22 23 23 21 23 23 22 21 22 7 9 23 23 Mean 1.13 1.39 1.41 1.48 1.83 1.38 1.78 1.70 1.68 2.52 1.68 2.00 1.78 1.70 2.04

Southwest

N 91 91 89 94 94 93 93 93 93 88 90 45 51 93 94 Mean 1.01 1.09 1.21 1.54 1.71 1.40 1.56 1.25 1.49 1.76 1.50 1.62 1.53 1.66 1.68

N 218 216 209 222 223 219 222 220 215 212 217 110 120 221 221 Mean 1.09 1.16 1.23 1.56 1.77 1.44 1.65 1.50 1.67 1.79 1.69 1.65 1.58 1.71 1.79

ITSE Central

N 24 23 21 24 24 24 24 24 23 24 24 14 15 24 23 Mean 1.00 1.17 1.24 1.46 1.67 1.33 1.67 1.29 1.43 1.38 1.42 1.64 1.60 1.54 1.57

Southwest

N 15 15 15 15 14 15 14 15 15 14 14 5 7 15 15 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.27 1.47 1.71 1.20 1.71 1.13 1.47 1.50 1.50 1.80 1.71 1.27 1.40

N 39 38 36 39 38 39 38 39 38 38 38 19 22 39 38 Mean 1.00 1.11 1.25 1.46 1.68 1.28 1.68 1.23 1.45 1.42 1.45 1.68 1.64 1.44 1.50

ITSW Central

N 6 5 3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 0 3 6 6 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.50 2.33 1.50 1.83 2.33 2.50 1.67 2.00 . 1.67 2.33 2.50

Southwest

N 16 16 14 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 12 12 16 15 Mean 1.25 1.06 1.21 1.75 2.00 1.63 1.56 2.06 2.00 2.06 1.69 2.08 2.08 2.19 2.40

N 22 21 17 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 12 15 22 21 Mean 1.18 1.05 1.24 1.68 2.09 1.59 1.64 2.14 2.14 1.95 1.76 2.08 2.00 2.23 2.43

LGLA Central

N 64 63 53 64 65 64 60 65 63 58 60 13 14 65 64

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 13 2/24/2006

Page 57: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.06 1.14 1.21 1.17 1.28 1.23 1.23 1.15 1.27 1.22 1.35 1.62 1.71 1.26 1.31

LGLA Southeast

N 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 4 4 10 10 Mean 1.00 1.30 1.30 1.50 1.60 1.60 1.40 1.40 1.50 1.30 1.30 1.50 1.75 1.50 1.60

N 74 73 63 74 75 74 70 75 73 68 70 17 18 75 74 Mean 1.05 1.16 1.22 1.22 1.32 1.28 1.26 1.19 1.30 1.24 1.34 1.59 1.72 1.29 1.35

MCHN Central

N 169 172 162 176 181 181 178 181 179 173 180 180 177 181 181 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.19 1.31 1.15 1.18 1.15 1.15 1.17 1.32 1.21 1.18 1.12 1.17 1.13

N 169 172 162 176 181 181 178 181 179 173 180 180 177 181 181 Mean 1.11 1.15 1.19 1.31 1.15 1.18 1.15 1.15 1.17 1.32 1.21 1.18 1.12 1.17 1.13

MDCA HS

N 126 124 123 129 129 128 127 129 128 125 128 95 96 129 129 Mean 1.09 1.06 1.20 1.41 1.43 1.36 1.62 1.38 1.40 1.50 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.45 1.47

N 126 124 123 129 129 128 127 129 128 125 128 95 96 129 129 Mean 1.09 1.06 1.20 1.41 1.43 1.36 1.62 1.38 1.40 1.50 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.45 1.47

MLAB HS

N 73 72 71 73 73 69 73 73 73 70 72 66 66 72 73 Mean 1.04 1.15 1.11 1.47 1.73 1.41 1.75 1.44 1.53 1.79 1.57 1.41 1.52 1.56 1.66

N 73 72 71 73 73 69 73 73 73 70 72 66 66 72 73 Mean 1.04 1.15 1.11 1.47 1.73 1.41 1.75 1.44 1.53 1.79 1.57 1.41 1.52 1.56 1.66

MLSC Northeast

N 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

N 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 Mean 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . . 1.00 1.00

MRKG Central

N 25 25 25 27 27 27 27 27 26 27 27 9 8 27 27 Mean 1.04 1.12 1.04 1.11 1.15 1.11 1.04 1.00 1.08 1.07 1.15 1.22 1.50 1.19 1.11

Northwest

N 8 8 6 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 7 2 2 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.13 1.33 1.25 1.13 1.13 1.38 1.13 1.29 1.25 1.29 1.50 1.50 1.25 1.25

N 33 33 31 35 35 35 35 35 33 35 34 11 10 35 35

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 14 2/24/2006

Page 58: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.03 1.12 1.10 1.14 1.14 1.11 1.11 1.03 1.12 1.11 1.18 1.27 1.50 1.20 1.14

MUSB Northwest

N 32 31 28 34 33 32 32 31 30 32 33 17 16 34 32 Mean 1.22 1.13 1.21 1.32 1.64 1.56 2.00 1.52 1.67 1.41 1.52 1.71 1.56 1.44 1.81

N 32 31 28 34 33 32 32 31 30 32 33 17 16 34 32 Mean 1.22 1.13 1.21 1.32 1.64 1.56 2.00 1.52 1.67 1.41 1.52 1.71 1.56 1.44 1.81

MUSC Northwest

N 157 126 149 162 162 158 158 161 151 154 153 121 126 162 161 Mean 1.08 1.34 1.13 1.21 1.39 1.27 1.48 1.25 1.39 1.44 1.67 1.33 1.40 1.27 1.29

N 157 126 149 162 162 158 158 161 151 154 153 121 126 162 161 Mean 1.08 1.34 1.13 1.21 1.39 1.27 1.48 1.25 1.39 1.44 1.67 1.33 1.40 1.27 1.29

MUSP Northwest

N 25 14 22 19 27 26 27 27 27 25 22 9 12 26 26 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.05 1.33 1.25 1.00 1.00

N 25 14 22 19 27 26 27 27 27 25 22 9 12 26 26 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.21 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.05 1.33 1.25 1.00 1.00

NMTT HS

N 149 144 150 151 152 150 151 150 145 145 147 129 129 150 150 Mean 1.09 1.47 1.19 1.54 1.57 1.47 1.70 1.45 1.43 1.52 1.53 1.37 1.43 1.43 1.53

N 149 144 150 151 152 150 151 150 145 145 147 129 129 150 150 Mean 1.09 1.47 1.19 1.54 1.57 1.47 1.70 1.45 1.43 1.52 1.53 1.37 1.43 1.43 1.53

OTHA HS

N 80 79 78 80 80 80 80 80 73 80 80 76 76 80 80 Mean 1.10 1.01 1.12 1.39 1.54 1.36 2.00 1.34 1.60 1.44 1.81 1.42 1.42 1.35 1.45

N 80 79 78 80 80 80 80 80 73 80 80 76 76 80 80 Mean 1.10 1.01 1.12 1.39 1.54 1.36 2.00 1.34 1.60 1.44 1.81 1.42 1.42 1.35 1.45

PHRA HS

N 163 163 159 167 167 167 165 165 167 161 165 112 111 167 167 Mean 1.02 1.26 1.16 1.35 1.38 1.34 1.44 1.36 1.42 1.66 1.51 1.35 1.38 1.46 1.43

N 163 163 159 167 167 167 165 165 167 161 165 112 111 167 167 Mean 1.02 1.26 1.16 1.35 1.38 1.34 1.44 1.36 1.42 1.66 1.51 1.35 1.38 1.46 1.43

POFI Central

N 98 94 84 96 99 98 96 98 93 93 93 61 61 97 97

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 15 2/24/2006

Page 59: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.02 1.02 1.17 1.39 1.46 1.38 1.52 1.26 1.46 1.55 1.52 1.62 1.52 1.42 1.44

POFI Northeast

N 49 47 42 48 50 50 46 50 48 45 50 23 23 49 48 Mean 1.16 1.09 1.24 1.50 1.78 1.52 1.59 1.42 1.63 1.60 1.74 1.87 1.78 1.63 1.77

Northwest

N 30 30 27 30 30 30 29 30 29 28 30 18 20 29 29 Mean 1.07 1.07 1.22 1.53 1.47 1.37 1.76 1.43 1.72 1.71 1.73 1.83 1.90 1.72 1.69

Southeast

N 75 75 65 70 75 75 71 75 75 69 71 48 47 75 75 Mean 1.16 1.09 1.35 1.76 1.73 1.39 1.68 1.53 1.53 2.06 1.68 1.60 1.64 1.68 1.63

Southwest

N 157 154 140 158 157 156 154 156 145 151 152 101 96 155 152 Mean 1.04 1.05 1.17 1.39 1.48 1.33 1.47 1.26 1.43 1.64 1.54 1.58 1.61 1.52 1.43

N 409 400 358 402 411 409 396 409 390 386 396 251 247 405 401 Mean 1.08 1.06 1.22 1.48 1.56 1.38 1.56 1.34 1.50 1.69 1.60 1.64 1.64 1.56 1.53

POFL Central

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 Mean 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.40 1.40 1.80 1.40 1.80 1.80 1.20 2.00 2.50 1.40 1.40

N 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 Mean 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.80 1.40 1.40 1.80 1.40 1.80 1.80 1.20 2.00 2.50 1.40 1.40

POFM Central

N 39 39 35 37 39 38 38 39 37 37 37 17 17 38 39 Mean 1.08 1.05 1.20 1.62 1.54 1.34 1.71 1.41 1.59 1.65 1.65 1.65 1.88 1.45 1.62

Northeast

N 16 14 14 18 18 18 18 18 17 18 18 13 13 18 18 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.28 1.28 1.33 1.44 1.17 1.24 1.22 1.22 1.31 1.31 1.28 1.17

Northwest

N 14 15 15 14 15 15 15 15 14 12 14 7 7 15 15 Mean 1.14 1.07 1.07 2.14 1.93 1.33 1.47 1.67 1.79 1.50 1.43 1.71 1.86 1.53 1.73

Southwest

N 42 42 41 42 42 43 43 43 42 42 41 17 17 42 43 Mean 1.07 1.05 1.34 1.62 1.93 1.63 1.93 1.51 1.74 2.12 1.68 2.18 2.12 2.07 2.07

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 16 2/24/2006

Page 60: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

N 111 110 105 111 114 114 114 115 110 109 110 54 54 113 115 Mean 1.07 1.05 1.22 1.63 1.69 1.45 1.72 1.44 1.62 1.74 1.56 1.74 1.81 1.66 1.73

POFT Central

N 71 65 60 70 75 74 73 75 75 73 73 36 36 75 74 Mean 1.13 1.06 1.20 1.64 1.57 1.45 1.62 1.39 1.47 1.67 1.58 1.50 1.47 1.44 1.51

Northeast

N 22 21 20 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 22 8 9 22 22 Mean 1.05 1.05 1.35 1.13 1.39 1.22 1.43 1.22 1.30 1.48 1.36 1.13 1.33 1.41 1.32

Northwest

N 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 1 1 8 8 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.38 1.13 1.38 1.00 1.14 1.75 1.38 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.50

Southeast

N 39 39 36 37 39 39 38 39 39 35 37 26 25 39 39 Mean 1.08 1.10 1.44 1.59 1.49 1.46 1.50 1.33 1.41 1.63 1.57 1.65 1.72 1.44 1.51

Southwest

N 46 46 45 45 47 46 46 47 47 43 45 22 22 45 45 Mean 1.04 1.02 1.16 1.42 1.34 1.20 1.43 1.23 1.40 1.60 1.56 1.55 1.73 1.53 1.42

N 186 179 169 183 192 190 188 192 191 182 185 93 93 189 188 Mean 1.08 1.06 1.25 1.49 1.47 1.35 1.52 1.30 1.41 1.63 1.54 1.52 1.58 1.46 1.47

PSTR Central

N 56 51 54 53 59 58 54 59 58 54 53 52 49 59 59 Mean 1.07 1.25 1.15 1.62 1.41 1.40 1.46 1.32 1.45 1.83 1.58 1.38 1.39 1.37 1.47

N 56 51 54 53 59 58 54 59 58 54 53 52 49 59 59 Mean 1.07 1.25 1.15 1.62 1.41 1.40 1.46 1.32 1.45 1.83 1.58 1.38 1.39 1.37 1.47

PTAC Northeast

N 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 Mean 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.29 1.43 1.29 1.57 1.29 1.57 1.43 1.71 1.33 1.50 1.29 1.33

N 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6 Mean 1.00 1.17 1.00 1.29 1.43 1.29 1.57 1.29 1.57 1.43 1.71 1.33 1.50 1.29 1.33

PTHA HS

N 189 180 185 190 194 195 195 195 190 194 192 183 182 195 193 Mean 1.07 1.26 1.13 1.36 1.43 1.36 1.49 1.63 1.63 1.61 1.53 1.40 1.38 1.47 1.58

N 189 180 185 190 194 195 195 195 190 194 192 183 182 195 193

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 17 2/24/2006

Page 61: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

Mean 1.07 1.26 1.13 1.36 1.43 1.36 1.49 1.63 1.63 1.61 1.53 1.40 1.38 1.47 1.58

RADR HS

N 288 259 262 296 301 290 300 301 285 298 293 232 215 289 288 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.15 1.39 1.47 1.38 1.56 1.48 1.56 1.61 1.49 1.32 1.30 1.43 1.55

N 288 259 262 296 301 290 300 301 285 298 293 232 215 289 288 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.15 1.39 1.47 1.38 1.56 1.48 1.56 1.61 1.49 1.32 1.30 1.43 1.55

RELE Northeast

N 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 7 0 0 7 7 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.29 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 1.14 . . 1.00 1.00

Southeast

N 56 55 51 57 56 57 57 57 56 56 57 10 10 57 57 Mean 1.00 1.20 1.10 1.16 1.11 1.16 1.39 1.14 1.25 1.21 1.18 1.10 1.10 1.23 1.14

Southwest

N 235 197 213 212 236 230 215 233 233 214 209 74 72 234 231 Mean 1.02 1.08 1.13 1.21 1.18 1.17 1.32 1.14 1.23 1.27 1.22 1.30 1.26 1.20 1.21

N 298 259 271 276 299 294 279 297 296 276 273 84 82 298 295 Mean 1.01 1.10 1.12 1.19 1.16 1.17 1.33 1.14 1.23 1.26 1.21 1.27 1.24 1.20 1.19

RNSG HS

N 1068 1042 1021 1055 1081 1063 1077 1080 1058 1037 1038 836 810 1066 1058 Mean 1.15 1.38 1.33 1.69 1.66 1.60 1.94 1.66 1.69 1.79 1.73 1.53 1.55 1.64 1.76

N 1068 1042 1021 1055 1081 1063 1077 1080 1058 1037 1038 836 810 1066 1058 Mean 1.15 1.38 1.33 1.69 1.66 1.60 1.94 1.66 1.69 1.79 1.73 1.53 1.55 1.64 1.76

RSPT HS

N 155 147 133 152 156 153 153 157 155 149 151 82 81 153 154 Mean 1.14 1.14 1.37 1.75 1.92 1.73 2.08 1.91 1.76 2.04 1.79 1.66 1.68 1.88 2.06

N 155 147 133 152 156 153 153 157 155 149 151 82 81 153 154 Mean 1.14 1.14 1.37 1.75 1.92 1.73 2.08 1.91 1.76 2.04 1.79 1.66 1.68 1.88 2.06

RSTO Central

N 57 56 55 59 59 59 58 59 58 57 58 25 24 59 59 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.09 1.15 1.10 1.14 1.38 1.07 1.24 1.42 1.40 1.32 1.38 1.34 1.19

N 57 56 55 59 59 59 58 59 58 57 58 25 24 59 59 Mean 1.04 1.11 1.09 1.15 1.10 1.14 1.38 1.07 1.24 1.42 1.40 1.32 1.38 1.34 1.19

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 18 2/24/2006

Page 62: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

RTVB Northwest

N 84 72 82 88 89 90 87 89 80 84 87 61 62 90 89 Mean 1.19 1.31 1.24 1.50 1.72 1.49 1.87 1.36 1.61 1.62 1.62 1.61 1.61 1.58 1.81

Southwest

N 37 35 35 35 35 37 37 36 34 34 36 16 19 37 36 Mean 1.14 1.29 1.43 1.74 1.71 1.62 1.92 1.56 1.85 1.85 1.78 2.06 1.95 1.76 1.83

N 121 107 117 123 124 127 124 125 114 118 123 77 81 127 125 Mean 1.17 1.30 1.30 1.57 1.72 1.53 1.89 1.42 1.68 1.69 1.67 1.70 1.69 1.63 1.82

SCIT Northeast

N 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

N 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 Mean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

SGNL HS

N 25 26 26 26 26 25 25 26 23 26 25 13 15 26 26 Mean 1.36 2.15 1.69 2.00 2.46 2.12 2.40 1.96 2.48 1.92 2.40 3.38 3.33 1.96 2.38

N 25 26 26 26 26 25 25 26 23 26 25 13 15 26 26 Mean 1.36 2.15 1.69 2.00 2.46 2.12 2.40 1.96 2.48 1.92 2.40 3.38 3.33 1.96 2.38

SLNG HS

N 67 55 66 68 68 66 62 68 66 61 65 35 36 67 65 Mean 1.19 1.27 1.12 1.49 1.78 1.41 1.69 1.35 1.44 1.67 1.60 1.60 1.58 1.42 1.58

N 67 55 66 68 68 66 62 68 66 61 65 35 36 67 65 Mean 1.19 1.27 1.12 1.49 1.78 1.41 1.69 1.35 1.44 1.67 1.60 1.60 1.58 1.42 1.58

SRGT HS

N 152 145 147 153 153 152 152 151 152 148 152 135 135 152 151 Mean 1.05 1.00 1.12 1.28 1.36 1.28 1.39 1.38 1.38 1.51 1.37 1.31 1.33 1.32 1.34

N 152 145 147 153 153 152 152 151 152 148 152 135 135 152 151 Mean 1.05 1.00 1.12 1.28 1.36 1.28 1.39 1.38 1.38 1.51 1.37 1.31 1.33 1.32 1.34

TRVM Central

N 61 56 55 58 60 61 57 61 59 58 56 29 30 60 60 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.31 1.50 1.62 1.38 1.46 1.41 1.39 1.57 1.54 1.86 1.60 1.48 1.57

N 61 56 55 58 60 61 57 61 59 58 56 29 30 60 60 Mean 1.07 1.09 1.31 1.50 1.62 1.38 1.46 1.41 1.39 1.57 1.54 1.86 1.60 1.48 1.57

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 19 2/24/2006

Page 63: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTOR: SUMMARY OF MEANS REPORT : FALL 2005 WORKFORCE SECTIONS

Subject College Q01 Q02 Q03 Q04 Q05 Q06 Q07 Q08 Q09 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15

VIET Central

N 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.20 1.60 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.40 . . 1.00 1.20

N 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 5 5 Mean 1.00 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.20 1.60 1.00 1.20 1.00 1.40 . . 1.00 1.20

VNSG HS

N 469 464 453 470 476 470 473 475 475 467 466 302 298 474 470 Mean 1.14 1.31 1.19 1.55 1.62 1.50 1.78 1.40 1.39 1.46 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.50 1.60

N 469 464 453 470 476 470 473 475 475 467 466 302 298 474 470 Mean 1.14 1.31 1.19 1.55 1.62 1.50 1.78 1.40 1.39 1.46 1.53 1.53 1.53 1.50 1.60

VTHT Northwest

N 44 42 41 44 44 43 43 44 42 44 43 24 24 41 39 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.27 1.16 1.16 1.56 1.18 1.26 1.27 1.30 1.17 1.17 1.29 1.31

N 44 42 41 44 44 43 43 44 42 44 43 24 24 41 39 Mean 1.00 1.14 1.00 1.27 1.16 1.16 1.56 1.18 1.26 1.27 1.30 1.17 1.17 1.29 1.31

WLDG Central

N 38 34 39 40 39 40 38 40 40 37 38 40 39 40 40 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.08 1.45 1.38 1.35 1.45 1.18 1.35 1.76 1.63 1.23 1.31 1.20 1.23

N 38 34 39 40 39 40 38 40 40 37 38 40 39 40 40 Mean 1.05 1.18 1.08 1.45 1.38 1.35 1.45 1.18 1.35 1.76 1.63 1.23 1.31 1.20 1.23

Houston Community College System Office Of Institutional Research

RG: FA2005_WFC.spo 20 2/24/2006

Page 64: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System SEOI – Instructor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

INSTRUCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Specify an individual and location for the student proctor to return completed surveys, usually a department or campus office. 2. Recruit a student proctor to conduct the survey. Review with the student proctor their directions as the proctor (see Student Proctor's Directions). 3. Give the survey packet to the student proctor. Inform the student proctor about the return

of the surveys (name of individual and location). In order to ensure proper handling of SEOI forms, be sure to give the student proctor the envelope in which the survey materials were received. This is the return envelope.

4. Write your name and the Class number (not the course number) on the blackboard.

Explain to your students that the purpose of this survey is to improve certain aspects of the course and to help you improve the way you teach. Please be sure to explain that the survey is anonymous. Under no circumstances will the instructor know the student’s identity. Introduce the student proctor to the class.

5. Leave the room and do not return until the students have completed and turned in their surveys to the student proctor. The proctor is responsible for turning the materials in. Please make sure the student proctor understands where to turn in the survey packet.

If you have any questions regarding these directions please call 713-718-6259

Page 65: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Houston Community College System SEOI – Proctor Office of Institutional Research Updated on: 1/06/03

STUDENT PROCTOR’S DIRECTIONS

Enclosed are two sets of forms. All students are requested to complete an SEOI Questionnaire. The Written Comments form is optional. Please do not staple the forms together. 1. Make sure that the Class number that the instructor wrote on the board matches the class

number on the survey packet. After the instructor has left the room, pass out both sheets of the Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) survey. Keep any extra forms in your possession.

2. Read “Statement of Intent” to the students:

This survey instrument has been designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of your instructor and your perceptions of the effectiveness of the class instruction. Please give us your serious and fair evaluation of both your and class instruction.

3. Read the following instructions to the students:

• Use only a #2 pencil or a blue or black ink pen. • Write the instructor’s name and bubble in the Class number in the upper

right corner of the Questionnaire and the Written Comments sheet, if used. (Check to see that this is being done properly.)

• Fill out the Questionnaire independently, without consultation with other students. • Do not sign your name or leave any marks of identification on the answer sheet. • If this is a lecture class, you do not need to complete Section III. If this is a lab, clinical, workshop or practicum class complete all sections. • Written comments are optional but very much encouraged.

4. When students have completed the survey, collect the forms, place them face up in the

same direction, and place both completed and unused forms into the original envelope and close it.

5. Return the envelope (containing all forms) to the location and individual specified by

your instructor. (This is most likely the department or campus secretary) Do not return the forms to the instructor.

Page 66: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

Click here to view the SEOI Survey Instrument.

Page 67: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

updated on:12/14/01

INFORMATION SHEET - STUDENT EVALUATION OF INSTRUCTION (SEOI) PROGRAM

HOW TO READ THE INDIVIDUAL INSTRUCTOR REPORT

Your individual evaluation report contains the following information: • Name, Class Number (CRN), Course Title, Course Number • Question identification numbers (Q01 – Q15) appear across the top of the evaluation report. The

numbers correspond with the items on the standard questionnaire forms. • TOTAL - The "TOTAL " row shown reflects the total number of students in a specific course who

responded to each item. The numbers underneath "TOTAL" correspond to the items on the answer scale for the standard questionnaire.

Values for the answer scale to Questions 01-03: 1 = YES 2 = NEUTRAL 3 = NO 4 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

Values for the answer scale to Questions 04-15: 1 = STRONGLY AGREE 2 = AGREE 3 = NEUTRAL 4 = DISAGREE 5 = STRONGLY DISAGREE 6 = NO BASIS FOR JUDGMENT

• MEAN - Averaged scores for each questionnaire item per individual class. At the bottom of the last page for each report, you will find cumulative statistics which provide the following information: • TOT. FREQ (total frequency) - Indicates the cumulative sum of students from your combined classes who

responded to each item. • TOTAL MEAN - Indicates combined mean scores for each questionnaire item for all your classes. • SYST MEAN – Indicates the combined mean scores on each questionnaire item for your discipline across the

entire college system. NOTE: If you taught more than one course during the semester, the data for those courses appear on the printout under the respective course numbers. Now, turn to the other side of this sheet for an illustration of how to read your report.

Page 68: Results of Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) · Executive Summary Fall 2005 Administration: The Student Evaluation of Instruction (SEOI) was administered to all full-time and

updated on:12/14/01

HOUSTON COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM STUDENT EVALUATION REPORT - BY INSTRUCTOR

NAME CRN Q01 Q02 Q03 Q4 ……. Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 DOE, J. M. 54321 ABCD 2301 TOTAL 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.25 1.25 1.12 0 0 0 TOT. FREQ 8 8 8 8 ……. 8 0 0 0 1 3 7 7 3 7 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 TOTAL MEAN 1.87 1.12 1.12 1.87 ……. 1.12 0 0 0 SYST MEAN 1.85 1.20 1.19 1.85 1.17 0 0 0

FOR QUESTIONS 01 - 03: Look at the TOTAL Now look under the column Q01: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

one. • Three students answered "Yes" to Question 1. • Three students answered "Neutral" to Question 1. • Two students answered "No" to Question 1. • None of the students answered "No Basis for

Judgement" to Question 1. There are four possible answers to Q1-Q3, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

FOR QUESTIONS 04 - 15: Look at the TOTAL.

Now look under the column Q04: • Eight students responded to questionnaire item

four. • Three students answered "Strongly Agree" to

Question 4. • Three students answered "Agree" to Question 4. • Two students answered "Neutral" to Question 4 • None of the students answered "Disagree",

"Strongly Disagree", or "No Basis for Judgement" to Question 4. There are six possible answers to Q4-Q15, but if a field is not populated, it does not appear on the report.

Look at the TOT. FREQ row that (number of responses). Now look under column Q01: • The total number of responses for all classes taught by the instructor is eight. In the example, the number for the

cumulative statistic is the same because the instructor only taught one class. For an instructor who taught more than one class, the cumulative statistics would reflect the total responses received from all students taught during the semester.

The System mean is the cumulative average for all instructors from the appropriate teaching area who participated in the program during the semester. These figures provide comparative performance information.