Proposal Intan
-
Upload
ira-shalala -
Category
Documents
-
view
233 -
download
0
Transcript of Proposal Intan
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 1/22
1. SUMMARY
Metals have been associated with human activity for thousands of years. Although many
heavy metals serve as micronutrients for microorganisms, all are toxic in high concentrations due
to their ability to denature proteins. Resistance to heavy metals may develop in soil bacterial populations, but this may take several years. Nowadays, the heavy application of sewage sludge
has produce high concentration of cadmium and zinc that may lead to the soil pollution. The
contamination may disturb the biological activity in soil. The targets of this project are todetermine the species of bacteria that resistant to these heavy metals. Furthermore, to isolate and
observe the frequencies and characteristics of bacterial that do resistant to both cadmium and
zinc instead of determine the full range of bacterial resistance to that heavy metals and making
comparison between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria for its resistance if possible. Themethod for this project is the sampling that will be done at the sewage sludge area between
20cm-50cm depth. Next are the isolation bacteria from the various samples in order to compare
the total number of bacterial isolates. Then is the testing of the bacteria isolates for their resistance against Cd2+ and Zn2+. Finally the screening of bacteria isolates recovered from the soil
sample for the presence of plasmids that may locate the gene of resistance against the Cd2+ and
Zn2+. Bacterial species that are expected to be obtain including Pseudomonas sp. and Alcaligene
sp. for Gram-negative bacteria and Bacillus sp. for Gram-positive bacteria.
1
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 2/22
2. INTRODUCTION
Soil is defined in soil science as an independent body in nature with a unique morphology
from the surface down to the parent material as expressed by the soil profile. Soil is the product
of biochemical weathering of the parent material, and its formation is influenced by the soil
formation factors that including climate, organisms, parent material, relief and time (Jenny,
1941; Brady, 1990). Heavy metal contamination in soils is one of the world`s major
environmental problems. Heavy metal polluted soils become a major environmental problem
because many of the element will persist in the soil for hundred or even thousands of years, and
already polluted soils therefore require careful management. In particular, soils in such region
have been polluted from a wide range of sources with nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), Zinc (Zn),
mercury (Hg), cobalt (Co) and other heavy metals. Heavy metals occur naturally in soils at
relatively low concentration, as a result of the weathering and other pedogenic process acting on
the rock fragments on which the soils developed. Cadmium (Cd) for example, in soils it is
derived from both natural and anthropogenic sources. Natural sources include underlying
bedrock or transported parent material such as glacial till and alluvium. Anthropogenic input of
cadmium to soils occurs by aerial deposition and sewage sludge, manure and phosphate fertilizer
application. The determination of manganese (Mn) in soils is due to the present of it in small
quantities in many crystalline rocks. It is released into the soil by rock weathering and is
redeposited in various forms of Mn oxides such as pyrolusite (MnO2), braunite (Mn2O3) and
manganite (MnO(OH) or Mn2O3.H2O). For zinc (Zn), it seems to be distributed rather uniformly
in the magmatic rocks. The Zn concentration in argillaceous sediments and shales is higher than
in sandstones and carboniferous rocks. The Zn occurs chiefly as single sulfides (ZnS), but is also
known to substitute for Mg2+ in silicates (Alina, K.P. and Henryk, P., 1984). While copper (Cu),
2
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 3/22
is classified as a native element, which means it can occur as a native element in the earth crust.
Copper belongs to the gold group, a noble element. However, the most common form of Cu in
soils is in the form of minerals such as sulfides, oxides, carbonates and silicates. Many of these
minerals are major constituents of copper deposits in copper mines (Hurlbut and Klein, 1977).
Some of heavy metals are essential and are required by the organisms as a micro nutrients
and are known as trace element (Bruins,M.R., et al , 2000). They are involved in redox processes,
in order to stabilize molecules through electrostatic interactions. Although some heavy metals
are essential trace elements, at high concentrations, it will be toxic to all branches of life
including microbes by forming complex with them. Because heavy metals are increasingly found
in microbial habitats due to natural and industrial processes, microbes have evolved several
mechanisms to tolerate the presence of heavy metals by few reactions. They are including efflux,
complexation, or reduction of metal ions. The objectives of these studies are actually to
determine type of bacterial species that resistance towards heavy metal in soils and to isolate and
characterize the full range of the resistance bacterial strain to heavy metals contaminated soils.
Besides we also are going to do the comparison between characteristic of bacterial presence for
heavy metals tolerance.
3
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 4/22
3. LITERATURE FEVIEW
3.1 Heavy Metal
Heavy metal refers to any metallic chemical element that has a relatively high density and
is toxic or poisonous at high concentrations. Instead of a kind of metalloids which associated
with pollution and toxicity, it also includes some elements which are essential for living
organisms at low concentration. Heavy metals are natural components of the Earth's crust which
cannot be degraded or destroyed. Heavy metals are dangerous because they tend to
bioaccumulate, which means they tend to increase in the concentration of a chemical in a
biological organism over time, compared to the chemical's concentration in the environment.
Due to Niargu, J.O., 1988, we may be experiencing a ‘silent epidemic of environmental metal
poisoning’ from the ever increasing amounts of metals wasted into the biosphere.
3.2 Heavy Metals Pollution
Heavy metals give a high risk to the environment. For example, large quantities of Cu
and Zn salts used in pesticides, which been introduced in the environment during the spraying
the crops. Antimony is a metal used in the compound antimony trioxide, as a flame retardant. It
can also be found in batteries, pigments, and ceramics and glass.
Cadmium, Cd, is highly toxic to plants and animals. However, the concentrations of Cd
normally encountered in the environment do not cause acute toxicity (Alloway, B.J., 1993). The
predominant soluble Cd species in soils polluted from several different sources were fractionated
by Tills and Alloways, 1983, using combination of ion-exchange and reverse phase
chromatography. Cadmium tends to be more mobile in soils and therefore more available to
plants than many other heavy metals, including Pb and Cu (Alloway, B.J., 1993). The use of
4
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 5/22
cadmium-containing fertilizers and sewage sludge is most often quoted as the primary reason for
the increase in the cadmium content of soils over the last 20 to 30 years in Europe (Jensen and
Bro-Rasmussen 1992). According to recent soil survey done in China, at least 13 330 ha of
farmland in 11 provinces were contaminated by varying degrees of Cd (Zhang and Huang 2000).
Followed by Ayten K. et al (2002), contamination has a large detrimental effect on nutrient
cycling and microbial activity and that the effects of Cd are reduced by fertilizer and sewage
additions. The sludge treatment also significantly decreased the bioaccumulation of cadmium,
copper, and zinc in the exposed species (Agnes Y.R. et al. 2006). The main pollutant sources for
Zn in soil are metalliferous mining activities, agricultural use of sewage sludge and composted
materials, and the use of agrochemicals such as fertilizers and pesticides (Alloway, B.J., 1993).
There is many more heavy metal compounds react in various ways in soil. The extensive used of
it may lead to contamination in soil which probably will effect the environment.
3.3 Heavy Metal Resistance in Bacteria
Over a year, various types of species or genera of bacterial strains resistant towards heavy
metals have been isolated and identified. They also have been further characterized for their
benefits in order to resistant to heavy metals. Microorganisms within species of the same genus
or within strains of the same species can differ in their sensitivity to metals (Dong, J. et al. 2007).
Giller et al. 1993 demonstrated that Rhizobium meliloti was less sensitive, in terms of growth, to
Cd than R. leguminosarum and R. loti. Pseudamonas fluorescens G10 and Microbacterium sp.
G16 have been isolated as a lead (Pb)- resistant bacteria from rape roots grown in heavy metal
contaminated soil and it has been characterized (Sheng, X.F., et al. 2008). For the same
experiment, Saravanan, et al., 2007, proposed that low molecular weight organic acids excreted
by bacteria might facilitate increased heavy metal availability. Instead of resistant to lead (Pb),
5
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 6/22
they also resistant other kind of heavy metals including Zn, Cd, Cu and Ni. Pseudomonas
aeruginosa was said to be resistant to Cd, Pb, Mo and U instead of also resistant to antibiotics
(Marques, A.M., et al., 1979). Concurrently, two Gram-positive bacterial, Paenibacillus sp. and
Bacillus thurigeinsis were identified as both do tolerant to Cu2+, Zn2+ and Cd2+ (Rathnayake
I.V.N., et al., 2009). However it seems to be Paenibacillus sp. has more potential in developing a
biosensor to detect Cu2+ in environment samples. Zinc is potentially toxic to sediment bacteria
including Bacillus sp., Salmonella sp. and Arthrobacter sp. and could pose serious threat to their
metabolism in natural environments (Nweke, C.O., et al, 2007). Cyanobacteria are
photosynthetic prokaryotes that require a variety of metal cations such as Cu
2+
, Ni
2+
, Fe
2+
and
Zn2+ to maintain their cellular metabolism (Cavet et al., 2003). Additionally, Pages, D., et al.,
2008, described that there was a presence of clusters of genes contain a cadmium efflux
determinant (cadA) from Gram-positive bacteria involved in both antibiotics and heavy metals
resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia D457R. Huang et al., 2005 state that copper and zinc
accumulation in the roots and shoots of mycorrhizae infected plants were significantly lower
than those in the non-infected plants might also suggest that mycorrhizae efficiently restricted
excessive copper and zinc absorptions into the host plants. Finally, Yilmaz, E. and Ensari, N.,
2005 state that Bacillus circulans strain EB1 showed a high cadmium biosorption capacity
coupled with a high tolerance to this metal when grown in its presence.
3.4 Heavy Metal Resistance Mechanisms
To survive under metal-stressed conditions, bacteria have evolved several types of
mechanisms to tolerate the uptake of heavy metal ions. The mechanisms including efflux of
metal ions outside the cell, accumulation and complexation of the metal ions inside the cell, and
reduction of the heavy metal ions to a less toxic state (Nies, 1999). The ability of metal
6
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 7/22
bioaccumulation by some Gram-negative bacterial species such as Escherichia coli,
Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas syringae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (HASSEN et al., 1998)
was established on production of intracellular cadmium-binding proteins.
3.5 Genetic Studies in Bacterial Resistance
In order to identify the location of genes that enable bacterial to be resistance against heavy
metals, few genetic studies have been done. Nies, D. H., and S. Silver. 1989 found that the czc-
mediated resistance to Co2+, Zn2+, and Cd2+ encoded by plasmid pMOL30 is inducible in A.
eutrophus. Cd-resistance of soil bacteria is mediated by several genetic systems. Zhang, Y., et al
2008 had proposed that these had been well studied in the Cd efflux system coded by cadmium-
resistant gene cadA operon that widespread in Gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus
aureus, Bacillus firmus and in Gram-negative bacterium Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.
Followed by Lee S. W., et al, 2001, a chromosomal fragment encoding Cd resistance was cloned
from Pseudomonas putida 06909, a rhizosphere bacterium, and sequence analysis revealed two
divergently transcribed genes, cadA and cadR. Mutational analysis indicated that cadA and cadR
are fully responsible for Cd resistance and partially for Zn resistance. The cadA promoter is
responsive to Cd(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II), while the cadR promoter was only induced by
Cd(II).Whereas the ability of P. aeruginosa resistant to nickel and ampicillin is plasmid
mediated and transferable to other strains whereas Cd, Cr and Pb could be chromosomal encoded
(Raja, C. E. and Selvam, G. S. 2009).
4. MATERIALS AND METHODS
7
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 8/22
4.1 Sample Collection
Soils samples collection is taken from the sewage sludge, at a wetland area in Kuching,
Sarawak. The sample is taken in range 15-40cm below the soil surface. All samples are taken
using a sterile stainless steel spatula and put into the sterile glass bottles. The sample that have
been taken need to be stored at 4ºC until examination. The time interval between sampling and
bacterial isolation is within two weeks time.
4.2 Preparation for Heavy Metal Stock Solution
Prepare the heavy metal salt that need to be used in the experiment. Dissolve respectively
heavy metal salts in ultrapure water. Then calculate the concentration for the heavy metal stock
solution based on the solubility heavy metal salt in water. Sterilize the stock solutions by
filtration. Store the stock solution at 4ºC. Appropriate volumes of the heavy metal stock solutions
were added into Mueller Hilton agar (MHA) cooled to about 55 ºC to give desire final
concentrations.
4.3 Isolation of Bacteria and Culture Conditions
The time interval between sampling and bacterial isolation can not exceed two weeks. A 10-
fold up to 10-7 of fresh soil (1g) is done in phosphate buffered saline and transfer the aliquots
samples (0.1ml) of the 10-5 to 10-7 dilutions is spread on nutrient agar (NA) plates. Prepare
three replicates for each dilution and incubate the plates at 30 C for 72 hours. Select the⁰
colonies randomly with different morphological appearance from that culture plates. Purify is
done by further sub-culturing in the same media.
4.4 Storage of Bacteria Isolates
8
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 9/22
Keep the sub-culture bacteria on nutrient agar slants. Store all cultures at -80ºc in the 20%
glycerol broth. Prepare the stock cultures on slant agar, streaking single colony on the slant agar
surface and incubate at 30ºc for 48 hours.
4.5 Biochemical Identification of Bacteria Isolates
Incubate the bacteria isolates on nutrient agar for 24 hour before the identification
procedure at 30°C. Identify the isolates both morphological appearance and biochemical test
using analytical profile index (API) 20 NE test kit or API 20 E test kit (biomereux, france). API
20 NE test kit is standardizing system to identify non-fermentative bacteria while API 20 E test
kit system is used to determine Gram negative rods bacteria. Strip the API and inoculate with the
bacterial suspension of overnight culture on agar medium and incubate for 24 hours at 37°C.
Observe the colour changes (to distinguish the gram positive and gram negative).
4.6 Screening of Heavy Metal Resistance Bacterial Isolates
From the bacteria colonies recover on NA after overnight incubation at 30ºc, pick one
colony and spot it on MHA plates supplemented with different heavy metal salts. Incubate agar
plates selectively at 30ºc overnight.
4.7 Determination of Minimum Inhibitor Concentration (MIC)
MIC is to measure the level of heavy metal resistance. The method that been use for the
determination is refer to Filali, et al (2000). Inoculate single colony in LB media and grow it at
30ºc. Prepare a 10-2 dilution of the culture then amount of it need to be spread on MHA plates
containing different concentration of heavy metal salts solution. Incubate the plate at 30ºc 24-48
9
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 10/22
hours. Lower the MIC values indicate more toxic metals and higher the MIC values indicate less
toxicity.
4.8 Isolation of DNA of bacteria and Electrophoresis
Grow the isolate bacteria on a plate containing nutrient agar. Inoculate a colony of
bacteria species into Luria Broth (LB) media. Incubate with shaker overnight at 37ºc. Keep it at
4ºc for further used in DNA analysis protocols.
4.8.1 Isolation and Preparation of Genomic DNA from Bacteria
Transfer amount of culture into eppendorf tube and centrifuge. Remove the supernatant and mix
the pellet with TE buffer by vortexing. Add sodium dedocyl sulphate (SDS), proteinase K and
amount of nacl and well mix them together. Incubate the mixture in water bath for 10 minutes at
65ºc. Add 25:24:1 of phenol / chloroform / isomyl and centrifuge again. Transfer a clear
supernatant into new eppendorf tube and ad 24:1 of chloroform / isomyl. Centrifuge and the
pellet then need to mix with isopropanol by vortexing until a white precipitate appear. Dry the
pellet. Dissolve it with TE buffer and store at 4ºc for next use.
4.8.2 Isolation of Plasmid DNA from Bacterial Culture
Same as the first procedure for genomic DNA preparation, transfer amount of culture into
Eppendorf tube and centrifuge. But after remove the supernatant, suspend it with Solution I and
straight away keep it on ice. Add Solution II and invert it few times and keep it in room
temperature for 5 minutes. Add Solution III and invert it until white precipitate appears.
Centrifuge and transfer the supernatant into a new tube. Add ethanol and invert it again.
10
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 11/22
Centrifuge for 5 minutes at room temperature. Air dry the pellet then resuspend it in sterile ultra
pure water. Finally, run it on agarose gel electrophoresis.
11
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 12/22
EXPECTED OUTCOME
Due on this project, I could expect that I will obtain few bacterial strain from both Gram
positive and Gram negative isolated from the samples that able to tolerate to high concentration
of cadmium or even zinc in the sewage sludge taken from wetland area. The result might be
varied in term of frequency within resistance bacterial species depends on how long the exposure
of bacteria to heavy metal. Besides, if genes able to be identify in the bacterial resistance, then it
might be help for the other microorganisms to detoxify heavy metals and reduce pollutant by
cloning and introduce into the microorganism resistance level.
12
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 13/22
WORK SCHEDULE
Project activities 2009 2010
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mac Apr May
Identify source
of data
► ► ●
Proposal writing
and presentation
► ●
Data collection ► ► ●
Benchwork andsample
processing
► ► ► ► ●
Progress report ► ► ●
Data analysis ► ► ► ► ●
Data validation :
statisticalanalysis
► ► ► ► ●
Report writing
and presentation
► ► ●
13
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 14/22
REFERENCES:
Alina, K.P. and Henryk, P., 1984. Trace Elements in Soils and Plants. pp 99-119
Alloway, B.J., 1993. Heavy Metals in Soils. Cadmium, 101-121. Blackie Academic &
Professional, Glasgow.
Agnes Y.R. et al. 2006. Environmental Pollution.Vol 145, Issue 1,pp 41-50
Ayten K. et al. 2002. Biology and Fertility of Soils. Volume 35, No. 6, pp 428-434. springer.
Bloomfield, C. and Pruden, G., 1980. The Behaviour of Cr(VI) In Soil Under Earobic and
Anaerobic Conditions, Environment Pollution, 23a,103.
Brady,N.C. 1990. The Nature and the Properties of Soils. Macmillan Publ. Co., New York.
Bruins M.R., Kapil S., Oehme F.W., 2000. Microbial Resistance to Metals in The
Environment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety vol.45, pp.198-207
Cavet, J. S. et al., 2003. Zn, Cu and Co in cyanobacteria: selective control of metal availability.
FEMS Microbiol Rev 27: 165–181.
D.S. Holmes, M. Barreto, J. Valdez, C. Dominguez, C. Arriagada, S. Silver, S. Bueno and
E. Jedlicki. 2001. Whole Genome Sequence Of Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans:
Metabolic Reconstruction, Heavy Metal Resistance And Other Characteristics.
In:"Biohydrometallurgy: Fundamentals, Technology And Sustainable Development, Part
A" (V.S.T. Ciminelli and O. Garcia, Jr., Eds.), Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 237-251
14
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 15/22
G. Endo, M. Narita, C.-C. Huang, and S. Silver. 2002. Microbial Heavy Metal Resistance
Transposons and Plasmids: Potential Use for Environmental Biotechnology. J. Environ.
Biotech. 2, 71-82
G. Endo, M. Narita, C.-C. Huang, and S. Silver. 2003. Microbial Heavy Metal Resistance
Transposons and Plasmids: Potential Use for Environmental Biotechnology. J. Environ.
Biotech. 2, 71-82
Giller et al. 1993. Rhizobium Meliloti is Less Sensitive Toheavy-Metal Contamination in Soil
Than R. Leguminosarum Bv. Trifolii or R. Loti. Soil Biol. Biochem., 25: 273–278.
Hassen, A., Saidi, N., Cherif, M. & Boudabous, A. 1998. Effects of heavy metals on
Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus thuringiensis. Biores. Technol. 65: 73–82.
http://www.lenntech.com/heavy-metals.htm
Jenny, H. 1941. Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, New York.
K. Iohara, R. Iiyama, K. Nakamura, S. Silver, and K. Furukawa. 2001. The mer operon of a
Mercury-Resistant Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis Strain From Minamata Bay, Japan.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 56, 736-741
Lee S. W., et al, 2001. Applied and Environmental Microbiology vol 67, p. 1437-1444
M. Barreto, R. Quatrini, S. Bueno, C. Arriagada, J. Valdes, S. Silver, E. Jedlicki and D. S.
15
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 16/22
Holmes. 2003. Aspects of The Predicted Physiology of Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans
Deduced From Analysis of its Partial Genome Sequence. Hydrometallurgy 71, 97-105
M. Filella, N. Belzile, Y.-W. Chen, C. Elleouet, P.M. May, D. Mavrocordatos, P. Nirel, A.
Porquet, F. Quentel and S. Silver. 2003. Antimony in Aquatic Systems. J. Phys. IV
France 107, 475-478
M. Nar€ita, K. Chiba, H. Nishizawa, H. Ishii, C.-C. Huang, Z. Kawabata, S. Silver and G.
Endo. 2003. Diversity of Mercury Resistance Determinants Among Bacillus Strains
Isolated From Sediment of Minamata Bay. FEMS Microbiol. Letters 223, 73-82
Malik, A. and Jaiswal, R ., 2000. Metal Resistance in Pseudomonas Strains Isolated From Soil
Treated With Industrial Wastewater. World Journal of Microbiology And Biotechnology
16: 177-182
Marques, A.M., Congregado F., et al., 1979. Antibiotic and Heavy Metal Resistance of
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Soils. Applied Bacteriology 47, 347-350
Niargu, J.O., 1988. Environment pollution. pp. 139-161.
Nies, D. H., and S. Silver. 1989. Plasmid-determined inducible efflux is responsible for
resistance to cadmium, zinc, and cobalt in A. eutrophus. J. Bacteriol. 171:896-900.
Nies,D.H. 1999. Microbial Heavy Metal Resistance. Appl Microbial Biotechnology 51: 730-750
Nweke, C.O., et al, 2007. Toxicity of Zinc to Heterotrophic Bacteria From a Tropical River
16
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 17/22
Sediment. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 5(1): 123-132
Page, A. L. and Bingham, F.T., 1973. Residue Revise. 48, 1-43
Pages, D., Rose, J., Conrod, S., Cuine, S., et al., 2008. Heavy metal tolerance in
sthenotrophomonas malthophilia. PLoS ONE 3(2) : e1539.doi:10.1371/journal
Raja, C. E. and Selvam, G. S. 2009. Plasmid profile and curing analysis of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa as metal resistant. Article 13: Volume 6, Number 2, Pages 259-266 (8),
IJEST.
Rathnayake I.V.N., Megharaj, M., et al., 2009. Tolerance of Heavy Metals by Gram-Positive
Soil Bacteria. World Academic of Science, Engineering and Technology 53.
Sambrook, J., et al. 2001. Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
Saravanan, V.S., et al., 2007. Solubilization of Zinc Compounds by the Diazotrophic, Plant
Growth Promoting Bacterium Gluconacetobacter Diazotrophicus. Chemosphere 66
Selim, H.M. and Sparks, D.L. 2001. Heavy Metals Release in Soils. Lewis Publisher, US.
Sheng, X.F., Xia, J.J., et al. 2008. Characterization of Heavy Metal-Resistant Endophytic
Bacteria from Rape (Brassica napus) Roots and Their Potential in Promoting the Growth
and Lead Accumulation of Rape. Environmental Pollution 156, 1164-1170 .elsvier.
S. Silver. 2003. Bacterial Silver Resistance: Molecular Biology and Uses and Misuses of Silver
Compounds. FEMS. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 341-354.
17
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 18/22
S. Silver, L. T. Phung and G. Silver. 2006. Silver as Biocides in Burn and Wound Dressings
And Bacterial Resistance to Silver Compounds. J. Industr. Microbiol. Biotech. 33, 627-
634
S. Silver and L.T. Phung. 2005. A Bacterial View of the Periodic Table: Genes and Proteins
For Toxic Inorganic Ions. J. Indust. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 32, 587-605.
Y. Sasaki, T. Minakawa, A. Miyazaki. S. Silver, and T. Kusano . 2005. Functional Dissection
of a Mercuric Ion Transporter, From Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biosci Biotechnol
Biochem. 69, 1394-1402.
Yilmaz, E. and Ensari, N., 2005. Cadmium biosorption by Bacillus circulans strain EB1.
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Volume 21, pp. 777-779, springer.
Zhang J.B., Huang W.N. 2000. Advances on physiological and ecological effects of cadmium
on plants. Chinese J. Acta Ecol. Sin., 20: 514–523
Zhang, Y., et al,2008. The cadA Gene in Cadmium-Resistant Bacteria from Cadmium-Polluted
Soil in the Zhangshi Area of Northeast China. Springer
Zhang, Y. et al 2009. Responses of Soil Bacteria to Long-Term and Short-Term Cadmium
Stress as Revealed by Microbial Community Analysis. Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology vol 82, no. 3, pp 367-372. springerlink
18
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 19/22
19
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 20/22
http://www.ssd.sarawak.gov.my/home_power.php
20
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 21/22
Isolate the bacteria from the sewage sludge. Weight sludge contained metals (wet
weight). Mix the sludge with liquid mineral medium then incubate it for 2 hours at 30°C in the
shaker incubator. Withdrawn the subsample and serial diluted plated on mineral medium
amended with agar and CdCl2 or ZnCl2. Incubate aerobically or anaerobically for 24-48 hours at
30°C. sub-culture the recover bacterial on nutrient agar to obtain a pure cultures before screening
21
8/3/2019 Proposal Intan
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/proposal-intan 22/22
for heavy metal isolates. Stain the pre-pured culture several times by Gram procedure and
observe the colour development as well as size and other characteristics using light microscopy.
Determine the MICs of the metals using the plate dilution method (Malik and Jaiswal,
2000). Prepare the stock of metal salts in distill water and use the filter membrane to sterilize
them. Store the stocks at 4 ºC. Add the heavy metal solution to the nutrient agar in various
concentrations range (3.5 – 3200 μg/mL). Then spot the inoculated with approximately 3 x 106
bacteria. Incubate the plates at 35-37 ºC for 48 hours and the MIC is defined as the lowest
concentration that completely inhibits growth.
22