PA315 Lecture 2 Student

31
PA 315 Government Business Relations California State University San Bernardino College of Business & Public Administration Monty Van Wart

Transcript of PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Page 1: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

PA 315Government Business Relations

California State University San Bernardino

College of Business & Public Administration

Monty Van Wart

Page 2: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Agenda Historical background on government Models of government-business relations

Page 3: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Historical Background on Government

Page 4: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

4

How Many Governments We Have?

88,000 governments! Federal: 1 State: 50 County: over 3000 City: 20,000 Townships (largely in East): 16,500 Districts

School districts: 13,500 Special (purpose) districts (water, sewer, sanitation, fire

protection, community college, library, conservation, etc.): 35,400

Page 5: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Two distinct intellectual traditions Adam Smith The market-oriented

tradition Government lacks the

qualities to manage a country’s economy successfully.

Nonintervention by the state in economic matters is the wisest policy.

Institutions should emphasize the advantages of freely operating markets.

Alexander Hamilton The active

government tradition It was associated with

mercantilism which guided British policy toward colonial America

Government should control all aspects of economic activity in order to increase the wealth, unity, and power of the state.

Hamilton urged the national government to aid fledging industries by providing economic assistance and tariff protection.

Page 6: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

6

Historical Development of Government Later 1700’s: Anti-government era 1800s: Modest government era 1900s: Big (positive) government era Later 1900s to early 2000s: Resurgence of

marketSee http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/pdf/hist.pdf for historical data, especially tables 7.1 for debt, and 17.5 for government

employment figures

Page 7: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

7

1700s and 1800s Later 1700’s: Anti government

Started very small but has grown over time 1800’s: Modest government

0.8% of population worked for government Examples:

National bank (20th century Federal Reserve) http://www.ushistory.org/tour/tour_1bank.htm , http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/default.htm

Provision of infrastructure: postal, roads, ports, canals, levees, railroads (example #1, Erie Canal: http://www.canals.state.ny.us/index.html ; example #2, railroads: http://www.cprr.org/Museum/Maps/ , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Pacific_Railway )

Government contracts: building and repairing roads and bridges, army materiel (for example see http://www.dla.mil and go to Agency Briefing),

protection (Government as purchaser) Nonetheless, still relatively defined and modest

Page 8: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

8

1900’s BIG Government: Expanded involvement in 20th century

2% worked for government; 8% of GDP Government as a safeguard against risk:

Insurance (social security, FDIC, savings and loan, flood, etc.); welfare, corporate loans and bailouts

Government as regulator regulation of business and protection of public good (licensing, OSHA, FDA,

SEC, zoning, building codes, etc.) Examples: http://www.osha.gov/as/opa/oshafacts.html ; http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml

Government as social architect Education example: land grant universities

Comprehensive plans, grants system http://www.sanbag.ca.gov/planning/subr_ctp-details.html

National heritage: historical sites, parks, wildlife diversity

Government as increased service provider Trash collection, utilities, Airports, trains

Page 9: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

9

Later 1900s to early 2000s: Resurgence of Market

7% worked for government; 32% of GDP Resurgence of market model as preeminent

model Reasons

Demise of USSR and Cold War, Slow conversion of China from communism and India from

socialism, Sharp reduction of government services in Westminister

countries— New Zealand, Britain, Australia, etc.*Well recited in The Commanding Heights by Yergin and Stanislaw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jqy0Gbo1DX8&mode=related&search=)

Increase in global competition

Page 10: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

10

Evolving size and function of Government, cont.

State and local employment have continued to increase proportionally with population, currently 19,000,000 (total all gov=23m)

Page 11: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

11

The Rate of Growth of Government Greatest during national emergencies

Civil War WWI Great Depression (1929-1940) WWII (1941-1945) War on Terror?

Economic booms In general, the 20th century was an age of government:

Invention of the income tax (16th Amendment of 1913); Great Depression and WWII; Perceived successes of government

Growth has slowed after 1978

Page 12: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Evolving size and function of Government, cont.

Federal debt growth (see US National Debt Clock for up to the minute debt owed,

http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/ ) (see the national GDP and last year’s debt ratio https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/)

Source: http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

Page 13: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

What the Federal Government Does?

Page 14: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

What California State Government Does?

Page 15: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

15

Why the growth of government despite the historical preference for small government?

To placate interest groups over time Difficulties shrinking government after periods

of government expansion More complex societies tend to need more

government (Wagner’s law)

Page 16: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

16

Summary of government’s roles interacting with and supporting business Government as provider of monetary and fiscal

structure Government as regulator Government as a safeguard against risk Government as provider of infrastructure Government as purchaser Government as social architect Government as service provider Government as promoter of business

Page 17: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

17

Are there proper roles for government? What are the proper roles for government?

The still more sophisticated question: to what degree and how should government play the various roles?

The answer is ultimately defined by society over time. Compare the dramatically different perspectives of social

systems primarily defined by subsistence, heritage, religion, capital, social equity, military prowess, etc.

In the American context, the argument is generally discussed in terms of what is

inherently governmental (a core government responsibility) and not inherently government (functions that may or may not be

run by the government depending on the conditions and the will of society).

Nongovernmental functions would include industry, commerce, private ownership, volunteerism, etc.

Page 18: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

18

Roles of Government: Inherently governmental National defense and civil order (e.g., military and

police) Maintenance of economy, e.g., fiscal and tax policy,

regulation of markets and competition Core public interest activities (public goods such as

parks and national treasures, public transportation, education, welfare, disasters, etc.) and civil liberties

Regulation of society for common good (laws prohibiting murder to

trespassing to jay-walking) and business (laws prohibiting air pollution and requiring record

keeping); especially for this class zoning and physical/environmental planning

Page 19: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

19

Roles of Government: NotNot inherently governmental Non-core basic public services

(e.g., postal service, utilities, airline transportation security, garbage collection, insurance programs)

not necessarily inherently governmental and meant to be relatively self-financing

Support of economic development: from reducing blight in developed areas to maximizing new development in “undeveloped”

lands

Page 20: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Models of Government Business Relations (Steiner & Steiner 2006)

Page 21: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

Four Models of Government-Business

Market capitalism model (normative>descriptive) Dominance model (descriptive) Countervailing forces model (descriptive) Stakeholder model (normative>descriptive)

Page 22: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Market Capitalism Model Business operates within

a market environment, responding primarily to powerful economic forces and being sheltered from direct impact by social and political forces.

Government interference in economic life is slight (laissez-faire) and undesirable.

Page 23: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Market Capitalism Model Conclusions about government business

relationship: Government regulation should be limited. Markets discipline private economic activity to

promote social welfare. The proper measure of corporate performance is

profit. The ethical duty of management is to promote the

interests of shareholders.

* These tenets have shaped economic values in the industrialized West and also increasingly elsewhere.

Page 24: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Market Capitalism Model Critics of the market capitalism model:

Capitalism creates prosperity at the cost of rising inequity. Markets erode virtue as it is increasingly energized by

avarice, self-love, and ruthlessness. Markets place too much emphasis on money and material

objects. Flaws, without correction, may reward conspiracies and

monopoly lead to enormous painful swings of excessive consumption and economic depression.

The profit motive has led companies to pollute and plunder the earth.

……

Page 25: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Dominance Model Business and government

dominate the great mass of people

Corporations and a powerful elite control a system that enriches a few at the expense of the many

Such a system is undemocratic

* The model does not represent an ideal in addition to a description of how things are.

Environmental Forces

Page 26: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Dominance Model Proponents of the model focus on the defects and

inefficiencies of capitalism that Corporations are insulated from pressures holding them

responsible Regulation by government to big business is feeble Market forces are inadequate to ensure ethical management

The ideal is to turn it upside down so that government business relationship conforms to democratic principles.

* The model gained a following during the latter half of the 19th century when large trusts such as Standard Oil emerged, buying politicians, exploiting workers, monopolizing markets, and sharpening income inequality.

Page 27: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Countervailing Forces Model (Pluralist Model)

Government business relationship is a flow of interactions among the major elements of society.

It suggests complex exchanges of influence among them, attributing dominance to none.

It differs from the market capitalism model by opening business directly to influence by nonmarket forces.

• Economic conditions• Markets• War• Ideology•Technology• Nature• Culture change

• Values• Opinion• Demands• Supports

• Market operations• Influence efforts• Lobbying• Leadership

• Statutes• Regulations• Political leadership• Partisan behavior

Page 28: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The Countervailing Forces Model Overarching conclusions:

Business is deeply integrated into an open society and must respond to many forces, both economic and noneconomic.

Business is a major initiator of change through its interaction with government.

Broad public support of business depends on its adjustment to multiple social, political, and economic forces.

Government business relationships continuously evolve as changes take place in the main ideas, institutions, and processes of society.

* The model reflects the government business relationship in industrialized nations with democratic traditions.

Page 29: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The stakeholder model Corporation locates at the

center of an array of mutual relationships with stakeholders:

Primary stakeholders have immediate, continuous, and powerful impact.

Secondary stakeholders have less mutual immediacy, benefit, burden, or power to influence.

The model is an ethical theory of management , in which the welfare of each stakeholder must be considered as an end.

Page 30: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The stakeholder model The model

Rejects the shareholder-centered view of the firm in the market capitalism model as too limited in focus and time

Creates duties toward multiple constituents of the corporation

Requires business management raise its gaze above short-term profits to see and respond to a spectrum of other values

* Many large corporations have adopted methods and processes to analyze their stakeholders and engage them.

Page 31: PA315 Lecture 2 Student

The stakeholder model Critics to the stakeholder model

It is not a realistic assessment of power relationships between the corporation and other entities, as it seeks to give power to the powerless by replacing force with ethical duty, a timeless and often futile quest of moralists.

It sets up too vague a guideline to substitute for the yardstick of profits for investors, without clear and objective measures to evaluate the combined ethical/economic performance of a firm.

It is not clear who or what is a legitimate stakeholder, to what each stakeholder is entitled, or how managers should balance competing demands among a range of stakeholders.