McLaw & Associates · LEAN SIX SIGMA IS BASED ON THE PRACTICAL LEARNING OF ... Total Quality...
Transcript of McLaw & Associates · LEAN SIX SIGMA IS BASED ON THE PRACTICAL LEARNING OF ... Total Quality...
McLaw & Associates
McLaw & Associates Master Practitioners in Operational Excellence
Alex McDonnell www.mclaw.ie
www.xpertivity.com Mobile: +353 87 223 9096
2x Service & Knowledge Worker Productivity
McLaw & Associates
Do you recognise your Team?...
Always chasing our tails!
Reactionary Environment! Fire Fighting!
No
LEAN SIX SIGMA IS BASED ON THE PRACTICAL LEARNING OF ORGANIZATIONS IMPROVING THEIR PROCESSSES FOR OVER 50 YEARS
Just in Time ( ‘ 80s)
Motorola – Six Sigma ( ‘ 80s)
Total Quality Management ( ’ 80s) BPR ( ‘ 90s)
GE ( ‘ 80s – ‘ 90s)
Transformation
Lean Manufacturing ( ‘ 90s)
Deming/ Juran ( ‘ 50s)
Ohno ( ’ 60/ ‘ 70s)
Just in Time (’80s)
Motorola – Six Sigma (’80s)
Total Quality Management (’80s)
BPR (’90s)
GE (’80s-’90s)
Transformation
Intensity of Change
Kotter etc.
& Leadership
Intensity of Change
Kotter etc.
& Leadership
Six Sigma (applied method for growth and productivity)
Customer Partnering (GE Toolkit, QMI, Customer CAP
Change Acceleration Process – CAP (Change method and tools)
Process Improvement (NPI, Supply Chain, Suppliers)
Best Practices (benchmarking, across and outside of GE, ending NIH)
Work - out (Kaizen type, cross functional teams, boundarylessness, values)
Strategy No 1 or No 2 in each business. Fix, close or sell
Six Sigma (applied method for growth and productivity)
Customer Partnering (GE Toolkit, QMI, Customer CAP)
Change Acceleration Process – CAP (Change method and tools)
Process Improvement (NPI, Supply Chain, Suppliers)
Best Practices (benchmarking, across and outside of GE, ending NIH)
Work - out (Kaizen type, cross functional teams, boundarylessness, values)
Strategy No 1 or No 2 in each business. Fix, close or sell
(Allied Signal) (Allied Signal)
(down - sizing, “ to be “ processes, process owners)
(SPC,Quality Circles, Kaizen)
(culture change/benchmarking, Baldridge/EFQM, ISO9000)
(down - sizing, “ to be “ processes, process owners)
(SPC,Quality Circles, Kaizen)
(culture change/benchmarking, Baldridge/EFQM, ISO9000)
Lean Manufacturing (’90s) (Kanbans, Pull systems, Visual management) (Kanbans, Pull systems, Visual management)
( “ Machine that changed the world ” , “ Lean Thinking ” , Value Stream Mapping) ( “ Machine that changed the world ” , “ Lean Thinking ” , Value Stream Mapping)
Lean Six Sigma (00’s)
(14 points, statistical quality)
(14 points, statistical quality)
(Toyota Production System)
(Toyota Production System)
Deming/ Juran (50s)
Ohno (’60/’70s)
Lean- Concepts and Knowledge are Well Known
Transformational Leadership High Performing and Adaptive Culture
Clie
nt S
atis
fact
ion
Em
ploy
ee E
mpo
wer
men
t
Pro
cess
Exc
elle
nce
Fina
ncia
l Exc
elle
nce
Basic Knowledge (Getting Started)
Basic Stability
Structured Problem Solving
Plan - Do - Check - Act
Information & Support Systems
Strategic Planning
Continuous Learning Organization
Lean 101 Core Team Training
Science of Mfg. Web Lectures
Leadership Book Clubs & Workshops
5S, Visual Management
Standard Work Process Map, Value Add Analysis
Kaizen Events
8D Problem Solving & A3 Process Improvement
DMAIC & DFSS FMEA
Decision Support Systems QFD
Visual Control Board
Deployment Leadership & VSM Management
Simulation Modeling
Lean/Agile/LSS Applied Learning
Hoshin Planning
House of Lean Building Blocks Capabilities & Skills
Pull Value & Streamline E2E Flow
Pull Systems, Kanban POUS Single
Unit Flow Process vs.
Functional Layout
Mapping
Stream
Value
5
True Lean: Structured Transformation Program
6
True Lean: Goes Deep & Narrow
7
Manufacturing
Process industries
Services
Toyota Automotive
Industrial products High fashion
Medical devices
Consumer products
Aerospace
Shipbuilding Pharma
Food production
Pulp and paper
Chemicals
Airlines
Railroads Naval operations and maintenance
Hospital
Insurance
Banking
Store retail
Upstream E&P
High Tech
Consulting
Law Firms
Hospitality
Clinical Trials Management
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE HAS BEEN ADOPTED IN MANY DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS
Financial Services
Traditional View of Business
CEOCEO
GM CreditGM Credit
GM FinanceGM Finance
GM MarketingGM Marketing
GM OperationsGM Operations
GM RetailGM Retail
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
Company XYZDepartment Name
Process View of Business
CEOCEO
GM CreditGM Credit
GM FinanceGM Finance
GM MarketingGM Marketing
GM OperationsGM Operations
GM RetailGM Retail
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
Company XYZDepartment Name
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Internal v Customer View of Business
CEOCEO
GM CreditGM Credit
GM FinanceGM Finance
GM MarketingGM Marketing
GM OperationsGM Operations
GM RetailGM Retail
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
Company XYZDepartment Name
CEOCEO
GM CreditGM Credit
GM FinanceGM Finance
GM MarketingGM Marketing
GM OperationsGM Operations
GM RetailGM Retail
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
NameTitle
Company XYZDepartment Name
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
Customer delivered Value
• Processes are Working But – Could Be Much More Effective – Could Be Much More Efficient
CU
stoe
mr S
ervi
ces
Customer Request
Non Value Added: “The Hidden Organisation”
Service Delivered
Non Value Add
Value Add
Beware of the Long Run
Managing Unintended Consequences
The “Laws” of Complex Adaptive Systems
• Today’s problems come from yesterday’s “solutions” • Behavior grows better before it grows worse • The cure can be worse than the disease • Cause & effect are not closely related in time and
space • The harder you push, the harder the system pushes
back…..eliminate the problem don’t fight it! • Small changes can produce big results – but the areas
of highest leverage are often the least obvious • Dividing an elephant in half does not produce two small
elephants • There is no blame
Based on Slack, Chambers, Johnson & Betts: Operations & Process Management© Pearson Education
Building Operational Excellence as a Core Competence
Phase 3
McLaw & Associates
“As Is”
Phase 1
Phase 2
Level 5 World Class Operations
Level 4 Optimised End
to End Processes
Level 3 Waste Targeting
& Elimination
Level 2 Measurement &
Awareness
Level 1 Executing Historic
Routines
Journey to Operational Excellence
Domain Expertise
Service Operations Fundamentals (Demand & Capacity
Management)
Lean Concepts
Process Structures & Optimisation
Systems Thinking
Key C
ompetences
McLaw & Associates
Com
petitors Performance
Trial Management Site
Initiation
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Site Selection
Regional Manager
CSRM
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Protocol Design
Sales
Sub Process
Ops Process
Custom
ers Expectations
Value Stream
Products
Standards Repository
Value Stream
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Sub Process
Inside out? Or Outside In?
This slide is animated
Approach
Science of High Performance is Known & Proven
McLaw & Associates
Lack of Knowledge is Not the Problem
19
?
How Do We Perform?
Delivered Service/Execution
A
Gap A: Does The Customer Experience Their Desired Level Of Service
Desired Service
Tolerance Zone
Expected Service
Desired Service
Tolerance Zone
Expected Service
Expected Service
Tolerance Zone
Desired Service
5
1
5
1
What do They Value?
B Understanding & Articulation Of Customer Requirements
Gap B: Do We Understand what Customers Value.
C Customer Driven Service Design & Standards
Gap C: Have We Designed Our Products and Service to Meet These Needs.
E
• Explicit Promise
• Implicit Promise
• Word of Mouth • Past
Experience • Personal Needs External
Com
munications
Gap E: Do Our Communications set the Right Expectation Level.
Gap D: Does our Delivery Execution meet these Needs. D
Gap A: Gap B x Gap C x Gap D x Gap E 66% 90% x 90% x 90% x 90%
How Do Competitors Perform?
Competitors Consumer Corporate SME
Who Are our Customers?
What is Business Performance?
Key Components
Gaps in “Design for How People Learn” 1. Knowledge Gap
1. What information does the learner need to be successful? 2. When along the route will they need it? 3. What formats would best support that?
2. Skills Gap 1. What will the learners need to practice to develop the needed
proficiencies? 2. Where are their opportunities to practice?
3. Communication Gap 1. Are the goals being clearly communicated?
4. Environmental Gap 1. What in the environment is preventing the learner from being
successful? 2. What is needed to support them in being successful?
5. Motivation Gap 1. What is the learner’s attitude towards the change? 2. Are they going to be resistant to changing course?
Steps to Achieving Sustainable Change
Where we are today is not good enough
Step 1
Where we plan to go is the right place
to be
Step 2
Belief that we can get there
Step 3
Create a Guiding Coalition
Step 5
Top Management’s Role
Step 6
Achieve some Quick Wins
Step 7
Build Culture of Continuous change
Step 8
Achieving Sustainable Change
Develop a Roadmap
Step 4
Service Operations Fundamentals: The Foundations
Non-Value Added Demand
Trends Why?
Historical Trends
Manage How?
Current
Forecast What If?
Future
Work Team
Quantity per Day Man Hours/Day
Demand In Hrs/Day
Task Times ? Variability?
Current
Improve What, How?
Plan/Prioritise
Total Demand
Task 1 Time x Qty Task 2 Time x Qty Task 3 Time x Qty
to Task n Time x Qty
Customer Needs
Customer Needs
Customer Needs
Customer Needs
Service Delivered
Value Added Demand