LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified...

23
TRAINING MANUAL BOOK 3 TRAINERS’ NOTES LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS Sustainable interprofessional bodies for geographical indications and origin-linked products

Transcript of LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified...

Page 1: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

TRAINING MANUAL

BOOK 3 TRAINERS’ NOTES

Linking peopLe for quaLity productsSustainable interprofessional bodies for geographical indications and origin-linked products

Page 2: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

TRAINING MANUALon

Linking people for quality productsSustainable interprofessional bodies

for geographical indications and origin-linked products

This tool has been jointly elaborated by FAO through the Project on the Promotion of Rural Development through Development of Geographical Indications at Regional Level in Asia, funded by the French Development Agency (AFD) and implemented by FAO-RAP, the FAO Quality and Origin Programme and REDD “Sharing knowledge for ethical and tasty food”.

byPeter Damary

andPascal BernardoniCorinne Couillerot

Anna PerretAstrid Gerz

Marie VincentSok Sarang

BOOK 3

TRAINERS’ NOTES

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)and

Réseau Développement Durable (REDD)

Rome, 2017

Page 3: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Recommended citationFAO/REDD. 2017. Linking people for quality products – Sustainable interprofessional bodies for geographical indications and origin-linked products (Training Manual), by Damary, P., Bernardoni, P., Couillerot, C., Perret, A., Gerz, A., Vincent, M. & Sarang, S. Rome, Italy.

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or of the Réseau Développement Durable (REDD) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO, or the REDD in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.

The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO, or the REDD.

ISBN 978-92-5-109716-8 (FAO)

© FAO, 2017

FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].

FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].

This publication has been printed using selected products and processes so as to ensure minimal environmental impact and to promote sustainable forest management.

Cover photograph: ©FAO/Ishara Kodikara

Page 4: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Contents

T1. Essentials of geographical indications – a brief review 2

T2. Introduction to the non-profit business model of an interprofessional body for geographical indications 4

T3. Understanding the geographical indication value chain 6

T4. Interprofessional body as a federation of geographical indication value chain operators 8

T5. Role of interprofessional body for specific quality management and traceability 10

T6. Role of interprofessional body in promotion and market information 12

T7. Possible revenue sources for the interprofessional body and constructing the non-profit business model 14

T8. Setting up an interprofessional body 16

Page 5: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Acronyms and abbreviations

A4 Standard paper size of 21 x 29.70 cm A5 Standard paper size of 14.80 x 21 cmAFD French Development Agency [Agence française de développement]AOC Appellation d’origine contrôléeB2B Business-to-businessB2C Business-to-consumerBoR Book of requirements CIRAD International Cooperation Centre of Agricultural Research for Development [Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement]CNRS Centre national de la recherche scientifique, FranceCoP Code(s) of practiceCpV Contribution per volumeEU European UnionGAP Good agricultural practiceGI Geographical indicationIFOAM International Federation of Organic Agriculture MovementsINAO Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité, FranceIP Intellectual propertyIPB Interprofessional body IPG Interprofession du Gruyère [Gruyère interprofessional body]IPI Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual PropertyIPM Integrated Production MethodIPR Intellectual property right(s)ISO International Organization for StandardizationITC International Trade CentreNGO Non-governmental OrganizationOLP Origin-linked productORIGIN Organization for an International Geographical Indications NetworkPDO Protected designation of originPGI Protected geographical indicationR&D Research and developmentROI Return on investmentSME Small and medium enterpriseTRIPS (Agreement on) Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (World Trade Organization)UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development OrganizationVCM Value chain mappingWIPO World Intellectual Property Organization

TRAINERS’ NOTES

Page 6: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

TRAINERS’ NOTES

Page 7: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Essentials of geographical indications – a brief review

T1

2

Recommended implementation of the module

Theory It is recommended that module C1 be read by all participants before training begins. Otherwise, the trainer may hand it out for reading (about ten minutes) at the start of the session.

Participatory exercise 1. Getting into the geographical indication issue

The objective of this exercise is to get participants to talk about is-sues related to the training programme, and share their views, opin-ions and experiences. Ideally, the participant group will include peo-ple from different backgrounds and different GI supply chains. In the exercise, it is important that pairing be done between participants who do not know each other (which will also serve as an ice-breaker).

Time required 0h45Materials required

• Sufficient copies of the exercise sheets (one per participant) • Pens • Flip chart for writing down statements

©FA

O/B

alin

t Por

necz

i

Page 8: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T1

3

1. Pass out the exercise sheets, one per person. 2. Ask participants to read the different statements and choose whether they are true (T)

or false (F), and put a T or an F in column 1 (ten minutes). 3. Once this has been done, divide participants up into pairs. Whenever possible, each pair

should consist of people who do not know each other.4. Each pair should then discuss and agree as to whether the statements are true (T) or

false (F) and complete column 2 (10–15 minutes).5. Gather participants into the plenary. 6. Discuss the answers from the various groups around the flip chart. The whole group

should then come to an agreement. The trainer should ensure that all concepts are correctly understood, by asking participants to explain their choices.

The trainer can then conclude the session by encouraging interesting views or discussion.

Page 9: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Introduction to the non-profit business model of an interprofessional body for geographical indications

T2

4

This module is central to understanding the training. The first half should be dedicated to ensuring that module C2 is well understood, together with the links between the various modules.

Recommended implementation of the module

Theory Start by introducing the business model concept, as presented in Book 2, including the questions that need to be answered (five to ten minutes).

Participatory exercise 2a. Describe a business model of your choice• Divide participants into groups of three or four, preferably

consisting of people who do not know each other.• Give each group exercise sheet 2a: “Describe a business model

of your choice”. • The exercise lasts approximately 30 minutes.

Feedback

Each group should present their business model to the plenary (five minutes per group), using either a PowerPoint computer presenta-tion or a flip chart. The other participants should be encouraged to discuss the presentation (approximately 30 minutes in all).

Presentation

The review should be followed by a presentation by moderators of the IPB non-profit business model, using whatever means they like, reflecting and drawing on elements from the previous discussion (20–30 minutes).

Applied exercise 2b. Division of roles between operators and interprofessional body• Divide participants up according to each of the value chains (or

GIs) represented. • Give each group exercise sheet 2b: “Division of roles between

operators and interprofessional body”. pix

abay

Page 10: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T2

5

Feedback

Ask one of the teams to present their results on a pre-prepared flip chart. The other teams should then compare these results with their own and state whether theirs are different, and why. Since each situation varies, there is usually no right or wrong, but it is essential for participants to understand that a GI IPB has different functions from a cooperative (except in very rare cases).

A sheet with a possible solution to the exercise is presented at the end of this module only to help the trainer. It should not be distributed to the groups.

For participants wishing to explore the question of non-profit business models, the following article may be of interest: http://www.blueavocado.org/content/nonprofit-business-model-statements

TABLE 3.1 Possible answers to participatory exercise 2b (for trainers’ eyes only)

Value chain operatorsInterprofessional body for geographical indication

Juridical forms and types of organizations

For-profit• Individual farm producers • Agriculture and processing firms• Cooperatives• Traders

Non-profitConsortium/chamber Association

Capital ownership/ responsibility

Ownership of land and agricultural machinesProcessing factories

Offices, computers

Production Farmers: produce quality raw materialProcessors

No responsibilities

Quality management

• Auto-control• Maintain documentation • Accept “external” controls; provide

information and documentation for inspectors

• Define quality (Code of practice) • Manage and guarantee quality• Manage relationship with external

certification body

Packaging/labelling

Undertake final packaging according to market demand, and integrating packaging and labelling regulations as defined by IPB

(Possibly define elements of packaging and labelling)

Trade Trade the product Open doors, help explore new markets

Revenue sources

• Sales of raw material • Sales of semi-processed products

to processing firms• Sales of final product to end buy-

ers/consumers

From members From external projects and subsidies

Promotion Promote own product, while simultaneously carrying a GI

Promote GI, its history and reputation

Source: REDD.

Page 11: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Understanding the geographical indication value chain

T3

6

Recommended implementation of the module

TheoryThe theoretical part of this module should be presented at the begin-ning of the session for about 20 minutes, using a PowerPoint pres-entation or flip chart.

It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Applied exercise 3. Mapping your value chainThe training then deals with actual practical elements that can be directly applied to participants’ own value chain cases. The results of this exercise will also be the basis for subsequent applied exercises in other modules. Therefore, they need to be recorded for future ref-erence (or posted on the walls of the training room).

Where participants do not have direct experience of a value chain, or are the only representatives of a particular value chain, this exercise can be carried out using the Cévennes sweet onion case study as a basis.

Time required 1h30Materials required

• A large (2 x 2 m) piece of paper, which could be two flip-chart pages taped together, or a large sheet of brown Manila paper, to be put up on the wall

• Coloured cards (A5 size) • Marker pens• Blu Tack, or similar, to stick cards on the paper• Camera and/or computer to record results at the end of the

session

©FA

O/A

less

andr

a B

ened

etti

Page 12: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T3

7

Preparation

• Divide participants into groups around a given GI value chain (as for applied exercise 1)• Provide them with an instruction sheet• Allow them 90 minutes to complete their value chain diagram

Feedback

Each group should present its diagram within ten minutes, followed by some question time. A final general discussion on the value chain and its analysis may also be carried out.

BOX 3.1Case of Valais rye bread

Functions• Rye cereal production• Milling• Making rye bread• Retailing in the Valais• Retailing outside the Valais

Actors• 40 mixed farms• Two mills• 52 artisanal village bakeries• One large independent bakery• One large bakery – part of distribution chain M• “Numerous” small retail shops• One large retail chain M

FIGURE 3.1Mapping of the Valais rye bread value chain

Rye cereal production

300 T

220 T

Milling Bread making Retailing in the Valais

Retailing outside the Valais

52 artisanal village bakeries(400 000 kg bread)

Numerous small retailshops and chain

22 mixedfarms(West)

18 mixedfarms(East)

Mill 1Sion

Mill 2Naters

70 000 kg

Other nationalretail chains

M retail chainnational

M retail chain

1 largeindependent

bakery

1 largeindustrialbakery M

Source: C. Couillerot, REDD, InterGI training 2013.

Page 13: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Interprofessional body as a federation of geographical indication value chain operators

T4

8

Recommended implementation of the module

TheoryIt is recommended that participants be given 20 minutes to read the theoretical part of this module. The trainer should then discuss it with participants, asking questions and completing Table 3.2 on a flip chart or white-/blackboard. Trainees should be encouraged to be as specific and realistic as possible.

Applied exercise 4. Identifying those who should be part of the interprofessional body and defining management structures

Time required 0h30Materials required

• Value chain diagram prepared in applied exercise 3 • Marker pens (at least two different colours)• Flip chart (or computer)

pix

abay

Page 14: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T4

9

Preparation

• Divide participants into groups around a given GI value chain (as for applied exercise 1)• Provide them with an instruction sheet• Allow them 30 minutes to answer questions

Feedback

Each group has five minutes to present its results, followed by questions and discussions on each case.

TABLE 3.2Functions of a federation

As a federation aiming to improve the market for the geographical indication, what are the five necessary functions?

Forum Decision centre Coordination among levels

Represent value chain

Information flow

Describe the functions

What is needed to fulfil these functions?

Database of members Membership*

Formal registration,statutes,decision-making bodies

Who contributes to these functions?

Voluntary and elected members among operators

*A special discussion on membership will be necessary, since membership varies in different legislations. It is important that all participants understand this. The principle that needs to be upheld is that all operators situated in the geographical zone and willing to respect the CoP (including being themselves controlled and certified) can use the GI for commercial use, and should be able to participate in decisions concerning their products.

Source: REDD.

Page 15: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Role of interprofessional body for specific quality management and traceability

T5

10

Recommended implementation of the module

TheoryTwenty minutes should be allowed for the presentation of the the-oretical part of this module at the beginning of the session, using a PowerPoint presentation or a flip chart.

Applied exercise 5. Design a traceability systemThe training deals with actual practical elements that can be directly applied to participants’ own traceability system. The results of this ex-ercise will also be the basis for subsequent applied exercises in other modules. Therefore, they need to be recorded for future reference.

Where participants do not have direct experience of a GI, or are the only representatives of a particular GI, this exercise can be carried out using the Gruyère case study as a basis.

Time required 0h40Materials required

• A large piece of paper, such as two flip-chart pages taped together, to be put up on the wall

• Coloured cards (A5 size)• Marker pens• Blue tack, or similar, to stick cards on the paper• Camera and/or computer to record the system(s) at the end of

the session

©FA

O/G

iuse

ppe

Biz

zarr

i

Page 16: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T5

11

Preparation

• Divide participants into groups around a given GI (as for Applied exercise 1)• Provide them with an instruction sheet• Allow them 40 minutes to complete their traceability system

Feedback

Each group should present their traceability system within ten minutes, followed by some question time. A final general discussion on the traceability system and its analysis may also be carried out.

Page 17: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Role of interprofessional body in promotion and market information

T6

12

Recommended implementation of the module

TheoryStart by introducing the concept as presented in module C6 (five to ten minutes).

There are two options in this module, depending on the situation in the value chains. If time allows, both may be undertaken.

Applied exercise 6a. Identifying priority markets or Applied exercise 6b. Telling your story(Exercise 6b can be turned into a brief competition, with members voting for the most convincing story).

Time required 0h45Materials required

• Marker pens• Flip chart or computer

lung

oibo

rdi.i

t

Page 18: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T6

13

Preparation

• Divide participants into groups around the different GI value chains• Provide them with an instruction sheet (either 6a, 6b or both)• Allow them 45 minutes to answer the questions

Feedback

Each group should present their results within ten minutes, followed by questions and dis-cussions on each case.

Page 19: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Possible revenue sources for the interprofessional body and constructing the non-profit business model

T7

14

Recommended implementation of the module

TheoryStart by introducing the various sources of income, as presented, putting particular emphasis on the importance of the contribution per volume (CpV) (five to ten minutes). Remind participants of the link between CpV and implementation of the traceability system.

Applied exercise 7. Developing the contribution per volume, preparing a first “budget” and identifying other potential sources of income

Time required 1h30Materials required

• Marker pens• Flip chart• Computer with spreadsheet (Excel)

©FA

O/B

elie

ve N

yaku

djar

a

Page 20: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T7

15

Preparation

• Divide participants into groups around the different GI value chains• Provide them with an instruction sheet• Allow them 90 minutes to carry out the exercise

Feedback

Each group should present its results within 15 minutes, followed by questions and discus-sions on each case.

Page 21: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Setting up an interprofessional bodyT8

16

Recommended implementation of the module

In this final module, participants use the tools and concepts dealt with in the previous module. Having outlined the business model for their IPB, they will work on putting it into practice.

The theoretical part does not introduce totally new concepts but re-views the different functions of an IPB together with the steps that are necessary to make the IPB operational and ensure these func-tions. Participants should have access to the printed version of the module and the trainer should spend 20 minutes going through the materials.

During the first applied exercise, participants will make a diagnosis or “gap analysis” of the existing situation.

The second applied exercise is the ultimate goal of this module. Participants should be able to take home with them a reference doc-ument to help them establish an IPB. Consequently, the document should be as comprehensive and practical as possible. Not only will the document help participants who are about to engage in the pro-cess of establishing or further developing their IPB, but it will also serve to mobilize other value chain stakeholders. It is essential, therefore, that the trainer leave enough time for the last exercise of this course. Ideally, half a day should be dedicated to the exercise, including participants’ feedback.

©FA

O/G

iuse

ppe

Biz

zarr

i

Page 22: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Methodology

T8

17

Applied exercise 8a. Diagnosis of the current situation

Preparation

• Divide participants into groups around a given GI value chain• Provide them with an instruction sheet• Allow them 45 minutes to answer the questions

Feedback

Each group should present the results within five minutes, followed by questions and discus-sions on each case.

Applied exercise 8b. Interprofessional body action plan

Preparation

• Divide participants into the same groups as the previous exercise• Provide them with an instruction sheet• Allow them two hours to answer the questions

Feedback

Each group should present its results within ten minutes, followed by questions and discus-sions on each case.

Time required 0h45Materials required

• Flip chart (or computer)

Time required 2h00Materials required

• Flip chart (or computer)• Results of all the previous applied exercises

Page 23: LINKING PEOPLE FOR QUALITY PRODUCTS · It may be helpful in the presentation to show the simplified value chain map of Valais rye bread as an example (see Figure 3.1 and case study).

Linking people, places and products presents a methodological approach for the development of procedures to preserve and promote quality products, centred on the virtuous circle of origin-linked quality. The guide provides concepts, recommendations and practical examples from all over the world, together with self-evaluation exercises.

With a view to boosting the capacities of those involved in such procedures, increasing the number of experts worldwide and also bearing in mind the recent level of interest in this subject, FAO and REDD plan to offer a complete training tool.

FAO and REDD have thus worked together to support a bottom-up approach, developing a first training tool for a participatory process of training on the promotion of origin-linked quality and sustainable geographical indications.

The training material in the present volume, Linking people for quality products: sustainable interprofessional bodies for geographical indications and origin-linked products, focuses on the management and promotion of the specific qualities of geographical indications (GIs) by local stakeholders gathered together in a collective management organization – the interprofession, or joint body – that are central to the commercial success, and ultimately to the sustainable impact, of any initiative to promote the link between a product and its origin.

In collaboration with

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)Viale delle Terme di Caracalla 00153 Rome, Italywww.fao.org I7062EN/1/04.17

ISBN 978-92-5-109716-8

9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 9 7 1 6 8