Landslide and Slope Stability

download Landslide and Slope Stability

of 36

Transcript of Landslide and Slope Stability

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    1/36

    CE 4745:Landslides, Slope Stability

    and Earth Retaining

    Structures

    Dante Fratta

    Spring 2004

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    2/36

    Introduction

    Landslides

    Slope Stability

    Need for Earth Retaining Structures and

    Flooding Protection

    Discussion of Factors Influencing Design

    References and Bibliography

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    3/36

    Landslides

    The Mamayes, Puerto Rico, landslide, 1985. This landslide destroyed 120 houses and killedat least 129 people, the greatest number of casualties from any single landslide in North

    America. The catastrophic block slide was triggered by a tropical storm that producedextremely heavy rainfall. Contributing factors could also have included sewage directly

    discharged into the ground in the densely populated area, and a leaking water pipe at the topof the landslide.

    URL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    4/36

    Landslides

    La Conchita, California-a small seaside community along Highway 101 south of SantaBarbara. This landslide and debris flow occurred in the spring of 1995. Many people wereevacuated because of the slide and the houses nearest the slide were completely destroyed.Fortunately, no one was killed or injured.

    URL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    5/36

    Landslides

    Fire-related debris flows from Storm King Mountain, Colorado. Debris flows blocked Interstate-70 during Labor Day weekend, 1994. A very hot and fast-moving wildfire in July of that year onthe slopes of Storm King Mountain denuded the slopes of vegetation. An intense rainstormgenerated debris flows from material on the burned hillslopes and in the channels betweenhills. Interstate traffic was disrupted for a day and caused serious delays for emergencyvehicles and hospital access, due to the fact that Interstate-70 is the only access route throughthis part of the Rockies. The Interstate-70 corridor through the Rocky Mountains experiencesnumerous problems from landslides, debris flows, and rockfalls.

    URL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    6/36

    Landslides

    The 1983 Thistle landslide at Thistle, Utah-This landslide began moving in the spring of 1983 inresponse to groundwater buildup from heavy rains the previous September and the melting ofdeep snowpack for the winter of 1982-83. Within a few weeks the landslide dammed theSpanish Fork River, obliterating U.S. Highway 6 and the main line of the Denver and RioGrande Western Railroad. The town of Thistle was inundated under the floodwaters rising

    behind the landslide dam. Total costs (direct and indirect) incurred by this landslide exceeded$400 million, the most costly single landslide event in U.S. history.

    UL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    7/36

    Landslides

    The Madison Canyon landslide near Yellowstone Park. This landslide occurred after theHebgen lake earthquake (Richter Scale Magnitude = 7.5) in Montana, in 1959. The earthquakecaused a great slide of rock, soil, and trees to fall from the steep south wall of the MadisonRiver Canyon. Twenty-eight people camping in the area were killed as they were overtaken by

    this 21 million cubic meter mass. The landslide formed a barrier that completely blocked thegorge and the flow of the Madison River, and created a lake.

    UL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    8/36

    Landslides

    Rock and snow avalanche, Mount Huascaran, Peru. In 1970, an earthquake-induced rock andsnow avalanche buried two towns. The death toll from the Debris Avalanche was 18,000 (totalfatalities from the earthquake and the debris flow was 66,000). The avalanche started as asliding mass of glacial ice and rock about 3,000 feet wide and one mile long. The avalancheswept about 11 miles to the village of Yungay at an average speed of more that 100 miles an

    hour. The fast-moving mass picked up glacial deposits and by the time it reached Yungay, it isestimated to have consisted of about 80 million cubic yards of water, mud, and rocks.

    URL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    9/36

    Landslides

    Melting snow and ice on the north flank of Washington's Mount St. Helens, triggered this lahar(an Indonesian term for a "volcanic debris flow"), which rapidly traveled down the flanks of themountain with the North Fork of the Toutle River. The melting snow and Ice resulted from the1982 eruption of Mount St. Helens

    URL:landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    10/36

    Landslides

    Sinkhole at Winter Park Florida-Sinkholes (1981): Subsidence occurs when carbonate layersthat lie below the surface dissolve. When the weight of the overlying ground becomes toogreat, or the dissolved area too large, the surface collapses into the void. These features

    occur in what is known as karst topography which is common in FL, KY, MO, PA, and TN

    URL:

    landslides.usgs.gov

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    11/36

    Landslides

    The Problem Landslides constitute a major geologic hazard because

    they are widespread, occurring in all 50 states, and

    cause $1-2 billion in damages and more than 25fatalities on average each year.

    Landslides pose serious threats to highways, lifelines,and structures that support fisheries, tourism, timber

    harvesting, mining, and energy production as well asgeneral transportation.

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    12/36

    Landslides

    The Problem (cont.) Landslides commonly occur with other major natural

    disasters such as earthquakes and floods that

    exacerbate relief and reconstruction efforts andexpanded development and other land use hasincreased the incidence of landslide disasters.

    Source: The National Landslide Hazards Program (2002)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    13/36

    Landslides

    The Problem (cont.)

    (Nelson 2004)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    14/36

    Landslides

    Triggering Mechanisms Intense Rain-Fall

    Water-Level Change

    Ground Water Flow

    Rapid Snowmelt

    Volcanic Eruption

    Earthquake Shaking

    Human activity

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    15/36

    Landslides

    Landslide: General term for any perceptible down slopemovement of rock or soil Can include bedrock, soil, or a mixture of these

    Classified according to the mechanisms responsible for the

    movement and the velocity of the movement

    Slope Failures - sudden failure of the slope resulting intransport of debris down hill by slumping, rolling, falling,or sliding

    Slumps Falls

    Slides

    Sediment Flows - debris flows down hill mixed with water or air

    (Nelson 2004)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    16/36

    Landslides

    Types and Processes

    (Canada Natural Resources 2002)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    17/36

    Landslides

    Landslides Types

    Fall: is the detachmentof soil or rock fromsteep slopes along thesurface. Little or noshear displacement(e.g. loess).

    Topple: is the forwardrotation of soil or rockmass about a point.

    (Turner and Schuster 1996)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    18/36

    Landslides

    Landslides Types

    Slide: is the downslope displacement of soil or rockmasses. It includes: rotational, translational, anddebris slide

    (Turner and Schuster 1996)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    19/36

    Landslides

    Landslides Types

    Flow: continuousmovement of soilmasses where shearsurfaces are shortlived.

    Spread: is the suddenmovement of waterbearing rock masses

    (Turner and Schuster 1996)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    20/36

    Slope Stability

    Slope Stability Analysis (Abramson et al. 2002) understand the development and shape of natural

    slopes

    determine the short-term and long term stability

    conditions evaluate the possibility of failure of natural or

    engineering slides

    analyze and understand failure mechanisms

    enable the retrofit of failed slopes understand the effect of seismic loading on slope and

    embankments

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    21/36

    Slope Stability

    Effect of Water on Soils Dry sand grains will form a pile. The slope angle is determined by

    the angle of repose (i.e., the steepest angle at which a pile ofunconsolidated grains remains stable - controlled by the frictionalcontact between the grains. It usually lies between about 30 and 37

    degrees.

    (Nelson 2004)

    Dry sand

    Angle ofrepose

    Grain-to-grain frictional contact

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    22/36

    Slope Stability

    Effect of Water on Soils Slightly wet soil materials exhibit a very high angle of repose

    because surface tension between the water and the grains tends tohold the grains in place.

    (Nelson 2004)

    Wet sand

    Angle ofrepose

    Surface tension thin film

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    23/36

    Slope Stability

    Effect of Water on Soils When the material becomes saturated, the strength may reduced to

    a very small values and it may tends to flow water (between the

    grains) eliminates grain to grain frictional contact.

    (Nelson 2004)

    Angle ofrepose

    Fully saturatedsand

    Water surrounds the grain andprevent grain-to-grain contact

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    24/36

    Slope Stability

    Slope Stability Failure

    (after Duncan)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    25/36

    Slope Stability

    Slope Stability Failure

    (after Duncan)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    26/36

    Need for Earth Retaining Structures

    Each year flooding causes more property damage inthe United States than any other natural disaster.

    Annually, flood damages average over $3 billion(Lilli damages expected to raise to $ 600 million -

    Levitan). In 1985 the estimated flood damage was $6 billion

    and affected over 250,000 structures.

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    27/36

    Need for Earth Retaining Structures

    Average flood damage for a home is approximately$20,000 per flood and is much higher for industrialbuildings.

    Flooding is not only expensive to the homeowner

    and the taxpayer, but also causes despair and worryfor its victims.

    Effective flood protection and preventive measurescan significantly reduce the expense and traumacaused by flooding

    Source: National Flood Proofing Committee (2002).

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    28/36

    Need for Earth Retaining Structures

    The Landslide Problem

    Slope failure near McClure Pass, Colorado (TheNational Landslide Hazards Program 2002)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    29/36

    Flooding Protection

    Incomplete List Retaining walls

    Sheet piles

    Dams and reservoirs Levees

    Embankments

    Other: diversion channels, retaining ponds,etc

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    30/36

    Flooding Protection

    Retaining walls and sheet piles (Bowles 1988)

    Retaining walls are structures used to retained soils or othergranular materials.

    Materials: masonry, concrete, wood, metal sheeting, reinforce

    earth, etc. The analysis and design of retaining walls is governed by the

    stiffness of the wall: rigid or flexible.

    Sheet pile

    Drainage pipe

    (Cheifetz 2002)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    31/36

    Flooding Protection

    Dams and reservoirs (US Society on Dams 2002) A dam is built to control water. Dams are made from earth, rocks

    or concrete.

    Dams are usually constructed on rivers to store water in areservoir.

    Dams help people have water to drink and provide water forindustry, irrigation, fishing and recreation, hydroelectric powerproduction, navigation in rivers, etc. Dams also serve people byreducing or preventing floods.

    (from McCarthy1998)

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    32/36

    Flooding Protection

    Levees(The Academy of Science of Saint Louis 2002): Levees are low ridges or earthen embankments made of

    silt, sand or clay, built along a stream of water.

    They help in the prevention of flooding of the adjacentland.

    Levees can be either naturally occurring or man-made.

    Man-made levees consist of an impermeable coresurrounded by an earthen material, with some type ofprotection to minimize erosion.

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    33/36

    Flooding Protection

    Levees(The Academy of Science of Saint Louis 2002): Dimensions of a levee are typically 2.5 m across the top,

    the height 0.30 m above the level of a predicted floodhaving once in 50-year frequency, the slope on the river

    side being three up per one across and the slope on landside five feet up per one foot across.

    There are federal standards for dimensions dependingon the local material available, anticipated force of the

    river and the amount of development in the area.

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    34/36

    Flooding Protection

    Levees (McMillan, J. - TheAdvocate 2002)

    Deep fissures on the batture - landbetween the levee and theMississippi River - reveal theground is again sinking at the spotwhere the levee collapsed in 1983.

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    35/36

    Discussion of Factors InfluencingDesign

    Social Requirements

    Engineering Requirements

    Economical Constrains

    Environmental Actions Water level

    Rain: intensity and duration

    Wind action

    SoilsMaterial Properties

    Grain size distribution Degree of saturation

    Void ratio

    Strength

  • 8/11/2019 Landslide and Slope Stability

    36/36

    References and Bibliography

    Abramson, L. W., Lee, T. S., Sharma, S., and Boyce, G. M. (2002). SlopeStability and Stabilization Methods. Wiley and Sons.

    Bowles, J. E. (1988). Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill.

    Canada Natural Resources (2002). Geoscape Calgary. URL:http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/gsc/calgary/geoscape/index_e.html

    Cheifetz, D. (2002). Slope Stability. URL: http://soilslab.cfr.washington.edu/ESC311-507/2001/FinalProjects/DAVID-CHEIFETZ/

    Eckel, E. B. (1958). Landslides and Engineering Practice. HighwayResearch Board. Special Report 29. NAS-NRC Publication 544.Washington DC. 232 pages.

    The National Landslide Hazards Program (2002). URL:http://landslides.usgs.gov/html_files/landslides/program.html

    Louisiana Floods (2002). URL: http://www.louisianafloods.org/

    McCarthy, D. (1998). Essential of Soil Mechanics and Foundation. Prentice-Hall.

    http://www.nrcan/http://soilslab.cfr.washington.edu/http://landslides.usgs.gov/http://www.louisianafloods.org/http://www.louisianafloods.org/http://landslides.usgs.gov/http://soilslab.cfr.washington.edu/http://www.nrcan/