IPCRF - T1, T2, T3, MT1-4

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:

Review Period: Date of Review:

Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS

Journal

LESSON LOG

LESSON PLAN/

1. TEACHING-Signed Observation

Form with agreement LEARNING PROCESS

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIONTO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

TIMELINEOBJECTIVESKRAsMFOs

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

(Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)

TEACHER I-III

RATING

USED EFFECTIVE TEACHING LEARNING STRATEGIES

PREPARED DAILY LESSON PLAN/LOG

INITIATED DISCIPLINE AMONG PUPILS, CLASSROOM/ ORDERLINESS & CLEANLINESS

JUNE,2014 to MARCH, 2015

40% 5- Has provided individual activities for a 130% and above of the classes handled for the rating period, Cooperative learning strategies was 130% and above effective when used, Teaching methods and strategies elicited 130% and above interaction from a class, ICT integration is 130% and above 4- Only 115-129% is evident 3-Lacking 2 indicators 2-Lacking 3 indicators 1-Indicators not evident

5-All daily lesson plans had the following objective, subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment/Each part had a full description of what to do with an example/Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented and time-bound/130% and above based on the budget of work /Attained 130% and above of the desired learning competencies 4- Lacking 1 indicator 3-Lacking 2 indicators 2-Lacking 3 indicators 1-Indicators not evident 5-Pupils were 130% and above guided in the observation of classroom rules and guidelines as


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS


CERTIFICATES 2. LEARNING

OUTCOMES

Form 1

RATING(Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE


TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

TEACHER I-III

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MONITORED DAILY ATTENDANCE

PARTICIPATED CURRICULAR & CO-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES


30%

Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper waste disposal were 130% and above maintained 4- Only 115-129% is evident 3-Lacking 1 indicator 2-Lacking 2indicators 1-Indicators not evident 5- Attendance checking was 130% and above systematically carried out 4-Attendance checking was 115-129% 3-Attendance checking was 100-114% 2-Attendance checking was 51-99% 1-Attendance checking was 50% and below 5-Initiated at least 2 curricular/ co-curricularschool activities with documented results

4-initiated and participated in co-curricular/school activities with documented results

3-participated in most of co-curricular/ school activities with documented results

2-Participation only without documented results


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS

PERFORMANCE

INDICATOR

PERFORMANCE

INDICATOR

MPS RECORD


Timeliness)

ALL SCHOOL FORMS


TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINEPERFORMANCE INDICATORS

TEACHER I-III

UPDATED SCHOOL RECORDS FORM 137,138, 1,2, CLASS RECORDS,TEST QUESTIONS,ETC.

ATTAINED 75% MPS AND ABOVE IN EVERY GRADING PERIOD

ZERO (0) DROP-OUT

ONE HUNDRED (100) PERCENT PROMOTION RATE

JUNE, 2014 to MARCH, 2015

5- Class record reflected the bases of 130% and above of pupils’ ratings in all classes/subject areas handled/Students’ portfolio contained 130% and above of his accomplishment/Table of Specifications is 130% and above prepared for tests that require it/Test questions were130% and above logically sequenced/130% and above used and updated SF1,SF2, F138,F137-e 4- Lacking 1 indicator 3-Lacking 2 indicators 2-Lacking 3 indicators 1-Lacking 4 indicators 5-130% and above MPS 4-115-129% MPS 3-100-114% MPS 2-51-99% MPS 1-50% and below MPS 5-130% and above Zero Drop-Out 4-115-129% Zero Drop-Out 3-100-114% Zero Drop-Out 2-51-99% Zero Drop-Out 1-50% and below Zero Drop-Out 5-130% and above Promotion 4-115-129% Promotion 3-100-114% Promotion 2-51-99% Promotion


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS


TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING



(Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)

TEACHER I-III

PHIL-IRI FORMS

SREYEA FORMS

PUPILS HEALTH

RECORD

MINUTES OF MEETING 3. COMMUNITY

INVOLVEMENT


RATING

ATTAINED 75% INSTRUCTIONAL READING LEVEL

ACHIEVED 95% READERS IN SREYEA

ACHIEVED 95% NORMAL LEVEL OF NUTRITIONAL HEALTH STATUS

CONDUCTED PERIODIC PTA MEETINGS/CONFERENCES


20%

5-130% and above Instructional level

4-115-129% Instructional level 3-100-114% Instructional level 2-51-99% Instructional level 1-50% and below Instructional level 5-130% and above Readers 4-115-129% Readers 3-100-114% Readers 2-51-99% Readers 1-50% and below Readers 5-130% and above NORMAL STATUS 4-115-129% NORMAL STATUS 3-100-114% NORMAL STATUS 2-51-99% NORMAL STATUS 1-50% and below NORMAL STATUS 5-130% and above accomplishment with set agreements met 4-115-129% of planned meetings conducted producing only set agreements and partial accomplishment of these 3-100-114% of planned meetings conducted producing set of agreements 2-51-99% of planned meetings conducted with minimal results 1-50% and below of planned meetings conducted with no results


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS






Timeliness)

TEACHER I-III

RECEIPTS,PICTURES,

ETC

BE ATTENDANCE FORM

MEMBERSHIP FORM 4. PROFESSIONAL

GROWTH AND

DEVELOPMENT

UNDERTAKEN/INITIATED PROJECTS/EVENTS/ ACTIVITIES WITH EXTERNAL FUNDING/SPONSORSHIP

ACHIEVED 100% PARTICIPATION DURING BRIGADA ESKWELA

PARTICIPATED IN RELATED ORGANIZATIONS/ ASSOCIATION

10%

5-130% and above project accomplishment with full documentation report on completion 4-115-129% project accomplishment with partial completion 3-100-114% project initiative only with no completion report 2-51-99% project initiative only with no completion report 1-No project/event/activity initiated 5-130% and above PARTICIPATION 4-115-129% PARTICIPATION 3-100-114% PARTICIPATION 2-51-99% PARTICIPATION 1-50% and below PARTICIPATION 5- Active member of at least 2 associations.organizations 4- member of at least 2 associations.organizations 3- Active member of at least 1 associations.organizations 2-member of at least 1 associations.organizations 1-Non-participation to any related associations.organizations


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS

T.O.R.

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL

RATING FOR

ACCOMPLI-

SHMENTS






Timeliness)

TEACHER I-III

CERTIFICATES

VARIES

Rater Ratee

ATTENDED TWO (2) CURRICULAR TRAININGS

DEMONSTRATED BASIC COMPUTER LITERACY

ATTAINED POST GRADUATE STUDIES

5-130% and above ATTENDED 4-115-129% ATTENDED 3-100-114% ATTENDED 2-51-99% ATTENDED 1-50% and below ATTENDED

5-130% and above SKILLS Demonstrated 4-115-129% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 3-100-114% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 2-51-99% ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 1-50% and below ICT SKILLS Demonstrated 5- Doctorate Degree 4- Doctoral Units 3-MAED 2-CAR 1-with Masteral Units


SCORE


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS(Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)

CERTIFICATES 1. PROFESSIONAL





MASTER TEACHER I-IV

GROWTH AND

DEVELOPMENT

RATING

demonstration

teaching

Documented

CONDUCTED SEMINARS/WORKSHOPS/ TRAININGS FOR TEACHERS IN SPECIFIC LEARNING AREAS

SERVED AS DEMONSTRATION TEACHER FOR SCHOOL/DIVISION LEVEL TRAININGS


30% 5- Conducted 5 seminars/workshops/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 4- Conducted 4 seminars/workshops/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 3-Conducted 3 seminars/workshops/trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 2-Conducted 2 seminars/workshop/ trainings for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports)

1-Conducted 1 seminar/workshop/ training for teachers in specific learning areas (supported by evidence/assessment reports) 5-4 lesson demonstrations served 4-3 lesson demonstrations served 3-2 lesson demonstrations served 2-1 lesson demonstration served 1-No lesson demonstration served


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS RATING(Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)

2. Instructional





MASTER TEACHER I-IV

Competence ACHIEVED ABOVE 85% OF THE STUDENTS PERFORMANCE AT THE END OF SCHOOL YEAR

COMPLETED THE REQUIRED COMPETENCIES FOR THE STUDENTS IN EVERY QUARTER

INCREASED NAT PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOL


40% 5- 130% and above student peformance (in MPS ) 4- 115-129% student peformance (in MPS ) 3-100-114% student peformance (in MPS ) 2-51-99% student peformance (in MPS 1-50% and below student performance (in MPS ) 5- 130% and above of the required competencies in every quarter completed 4- 115-129% of the required competencies in every quarter completed 3-100-114% of the required competencies in every quarter completed 2-51-99% of the required competencies in every quarter competed 1-50% and below of the required competencies in every quarter completed

5- 10% increase 4- 6% increase 3-5% increase 2-4 % increase

100% mastery of learning competencies

85% annual student performance

NAT RESULT INCREASED


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS(Quality, Efficiency,

Timeliness)





MASTER TEACHER I-IV

RATING

OBSERVED 100% OF THE TEACHERS IN THE SCHOOL WITH POST CONFERENCE IN EVERY QUARTER

CONDUCTED MENTORING/COACHING PROGRAM TO TEACHERS IN THE SCHOOL ON QUARTERLY BASIS


30% 5- 130% and above of teachers observed with post conference with teacher observation reports held in every quarter 4- 115-129% of teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 3-100-114% of teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 2-51-99% teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 1-50% and below of teachers observed with teacher observation and post conference reports, held in every quarter 5- 5 and above teacher mentoring /coaching sessions were conducted in every quarter ( with report) 4- 4 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted in every quarter (with report) 3- 3 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted in every quarter (with report) 2-1-2 teacher mentoring /coaching sessions conducted in every quarter (with report)

Quarterly observation forms for teachers accomplished

Instructional Supervision

3 documented mentoring/ coaching activities per quarter


Position: Position:



Weight ACTUAL

per KRA RESULTS

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL

RATING FOR

ACCOMPLI-

SHMENTS


Timeliness)





MASTER TEACHER I-IV

Rater Ratee

MANAGED PERFORMANCE OF TEACHERS FOLLOWING THE RPMS CYCLE (PLANNING AND COMMITMENTS, COACHING AND MONITORING, REVIEW AND EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING)


30% 5- Evaluated 130% and above teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 4- Evaluated115-129% teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 3-Evaluated100-114% teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 2-Evaluated 51-99%of teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle 1-Evaluated 50% and below of teacher performance following RPMS framework cycle

Accomplished teacher’s evaluation report

SCORE



40% 5- ALL DAILY lesson plans had the following objective, subject matter, procedures, evaluation and assignment, Each part had a full description of what to do with an example, Objective was specific, measurable, attainable, result-oriented and time-bound, 130% and above developed high order thinking skills

IPCRF - T1, T2, T3, MT1-4

Documents

Transcript of IPCRF - T1, T2, T3, MT1-4