Igor V. Moskalenko NASA Goddard Space Flight Center [email protected] with Andy W....
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of Igor V. Moskalenko NASA Goddard Space Flight Center [email protected] with Andy W....
Igor V. MoskalenkoIgor V. MoskalenkoNASA Goddard Space Flight Center
withAndy W. StrongAndy W. Strong (MPE, Germany) & Stepan G. MashnikStepan G. Mashnik
(LANL)
Propagation of Cosmic Rays and Propagation of Cosmic Rays and
Diffuse Galactic Gamma RaysDiffuse Galactic Gamma Rays(nuclear physics in cosmic ray studies)(nuclear physics in cosmic ray studies)
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 2 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
All Particle CR Spectrum
Energetically SNR – most probable sources of CR: ~5x1049 erg per SN(1/30 yr-1) – 5% of the kinetic energy of the ejecta.
CR propagate in the Galaxy for some 10 Myr before escape.
Synchrotron radiation of ultra-relativistic electrons: evidence of particle acceleration, but notprotons…
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 3 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
EGRET Sky: “GeV Excess”
The diffuse The diffuse γγ-ray emission is the -ray emission is the dominant feature of the dominant feature of the γγ-ray sky – -ray sky – an evidence of CR interactions in the an evidence of CR interactions in the interstellar medium: interstellar medium: bremsstrahlung, IC, bremsstrahlung, IC, ππ00
Hunter et al. 1997
Excess
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 4 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Reacceleration Model: Secondary Reacceleration Model: Secondary PbarsPbars
B/C ratio Antiproton flux
Ek, GeV/nucleon
Ek, GeV
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 5 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Positron Excess ?
Are all the excesses Are all the excesses connected connected somehow ?somehow ?
A signature of a new A signature of a new physics (DM) ?physics (DM) ?
Caveats: Systematic errors ? Systematic errors ? A local source of A local source of
primary positrons ?primary positrons ? Large E-losses -> Large E-losses ->
local spectrum…local spectrum…
HEAT (Coutu et al. 1999)
Leaky-Box
GALPROP
e+/e
E, GeV
1 10
100
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 6 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Propagation of Cosmic Rays: Why?Propagation of Cosmic Rays: Why?
ModelingModeling of the CR propagation and diffuse of the CR propagation and diffuse gamma-ray emission gamma-ray emission requiresrequires to combine to combine many many different kinds of datadifferent kinds of data obtained from obtained from astrophysical observations, and nuclear and astrophysical observations, and nuclear and particle physics experiments.particle physics experiments.
Why Do We Need to Study CR Propagation ?Why Do We Need to Study CR Propagation ?
In returnIn return, a correct model provides a basis for , a correct model provides a basis for many studies in Astrophysics, Particle Physics, many studies in Astrophysics, Particle Physics, and Cosmologyand Cosmology
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 7 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Dark Matter Signatures in CR
Diffuse gammas Antiprotons
Ek, GeVE, GeV
Well... But where is the nuclear physics?!
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 8 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
CR Propagation: Milky Way Galaxy
Halo
Gas, sources
100
pc 40 kpc
4-12
kpc
0.1-0.01/ccm
1-100/ccm
Intergalactic space
1 kpc~3x1018 cm
R Band image of NGC8911.4 GHz continuum (NVSS), 1,2,…64 mJy/ beam
Optical image: Cheng et al. 1992, Brinkman et al. 1993Radio contours: Condon et al. 1998 AJ 115, 1693
NGC891
Sun
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 9 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
CR Interactions in the Interstellar Medium
e+-
Sources:SNRs, Shocks,Superbubbles
Particle accelerationPhoton emission P
HeCNO
X,γ
gas
gas
B
ISRF
π
e+-
+-
P_
LiBeB
ISM
diffusion energy losses reacceleration convection etc. π0
synchrotron
synchrotron
IC
bremss
Chandra
GLAST
ACE
BESS
Halo
disk
escape
HeCNOsolar
modulation
AMS
p
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 10 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Heliosphere
Flux
20 GeV/n
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 11 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Transport EquationTransport Equation
ψψ((rr,p,t) – ,p,t) – density per total momentum
df
Vpdt
dp
p
ppppDp
p
Vxx
D
prqt
tpr
3
1
22
][
),(),,(
sources (SNR, nuclear reactions…)sources (SNR, nuclear reactions…)
convectionconvectiondiffusiondiffusion
diffusive reaccelerationdiffusive reacceleration
E-lossE-loss convectionconvection
fragmentationfragmentation radioactive decayradioactive decay
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 12 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Elemental Abundances: CR vs. Solar System
CR abundances: ACE
Solar system abundances
LiBeB
CNO
F
Fe
ScTiV
CrMn
Si
Cl
Al
O
Na
S
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 13 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Nuclear component in CR: What we can learn?
Propagation parameters:
Diffusion coeff., halo size, Alfvén speed,
convection velosity…
Energy markers:Reacceleration,
solar modulation
Local medium: Local Bubble
Material & acceleration sites,
nucleosynthesis (r-vs. s-processes)
Stable secondaries:
Li, Be, B, Sc, Ti, V Radio (t1/2~1 Myr):
10Be, 26Al, 36Cl, 54Mn
K-capture: 37Ar,49V, 51Cr, 55Fe,
57Co
Short t1/2 radio 14C & heavy Z>30
Heavy Z>30: Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge,
Rb
Nucleo-
synthesis:
supernovae,
early universe,
Big Bang…
Solar
modulation
Extragalacticdiffuse γ-
rays: blazars, relic
neutralino
Dark Matter (p,đ,e+,γ)-
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 14 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Fixing Propagation Parameters: Standard Way
Using secondary/primary nuclei ratio:•Diffusion coefficient and its index•Propagation mode and its
parameters (e.g., reacceleration VA,
convection Vz)
Radioactive isotopes:
Galactic halo size Zh Zh increase
B/C
Be10/Be9
Inte
rste
llar
Ek, MeV/nucleon
Ek, MeV/nucleon
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 15 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
stripping
5151CrCrattachment
Tim
e s
cale
(years
)
EC decay
Ek, MeV/nucleon
K-capture isotopes
Niebur et al. 2003
5151V/V/5151CrCr
Ek, MeV/nucleon
5151V/V/5151Cr Cr ≡ daughter/parent≡ daughter/parentElectron attachment & stripping
Solar modulation effect
Jones et al. 2001
5151V/V/5151CrCr
Ek, MeV/nucleon
K-capture & reacceleration
ISM
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 16 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
First Ionization Potential (FIP) vs. Volatility
•Low-FIP ~ Refractories•Rb, Cs – break the rule•Other important elements: Na, Cu, Zn, Ga, Ge, Pb
Rb
CsK
Pb
GeGa
Na
Zn
Se
Cu
~104 K
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 17 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Effect of Cross Sections: Radioactive Effect of Cross Sections: Radioactive SecondariesSecondaries
Different Different size from different ratios…size from different ratios…
Zhalo,kpc
STST
WW
2727Al+pAl+p2626AlAl
•ErrorsErrors in CR measurements (HE & LE) in CR measurements (HE & LE)•ErrorsErrors in production cross sections in production cross sections•ErrorsErrors in the lifetime estimates in the lifetime estimates•DifferentDifferent origin of elements (Local origin of elements (Local Bubble ?)Bubble ?)
natnatSi+pSi+p2626AlAl
WW
STST
TT1/21/2==??
Ek, MeV/nucleon
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 18 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Bigger picture…
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 19 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Matter, Dark Matter, Dark Energy…
Ω ≡ ρ/ρcrit
Ωtot =1.02 +/−0.02
ΩMatter =4.4%+/−0.4%
ΩDM =23% +/−4%
ΩVacuum =73% +/−4%
Dark Energy
Dark Matter
Visible atoms
Supersymmetry is a mathematically beautiful theory, and would give rise to a very predictive scenario, if it is not broken in an unknown way which unfortunately introduces a large number of unknown parameters…
Lars Bergström (2000)
SUSY DM candidate has also other reasons to exist -particle physics…
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 20 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Example “Global Fit:” diffuse Example “Global Fit:” diffuse γγ’s, pbars, ’s, pbars, positrons positrons
Look at the combined (pbar,e+,γ) data Possibility of a successful “global fit”
can not be excluded -non-trivial ! If successful, it may provide a strong
evidence for the SUSY DM
pbars
e+
γ
GALPROP/W. de Boer et al. hep-ph/0309029GALPROP/W. de Boer et al. hep-ph/0309029
Supersymmetry: MSSM Lightest neutralino χ0
mχ ≈ 100-500 GeV S=½ Majorana
particles χ0χ0−> p, pbar, e+,
e−, γ
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 21 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
CR Fluctuations/SNR stochastic eventsCR Fluctuations/SNR stochastic events
GeV electronsGeV electrons 100 TeV electrons100 TeV electronsGALPROP/Credit S.Swordy
Electron energy lossesElectron energy losses
107 yr
106 yr
BremsstrahlungBremsstrahlung
1 TeV
IonizationIonization
CoulombCoulomb IC, synchrotronIC, synchrotron
1 GeV
Ekin, GeVEkin, GeV
E(d
E/d
t)E(d
E/d
t)-1-1,y
r,y
r
Historical variations Historical variations of CR of CR intensity over intensity over 150 000150 000 yr yr (Be(Be1010 in South Polar ice) in South Polar ice)
Konstantinov et al. 1990
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 22 Nuclear Data-2004/09/28, Santa Fe
GeV excess: Optimized model
Uses Uses all skyall sky and antiprotons & gammas and antiprotons & gammas to fix the nucleon and electron spectrato fix the nucleon and electron spectra
Uses Uses antiprotonsantiprotons to fix to fix the the intensityintensity of CR nucleons @ HE of CR nucleons @ HE
Uses Uses gammasgammas to adjust to adjust the nucleon spectrum at LEthe nucleon spectrum at LE the the intensity intensity of the CR electrons of the CR electrons (uses also synchrotron index)(uses also synchrotron index)
Uses EGRET data Uses EGRET data up to 100 GeVup to 100 GeV
protonsprotonselectronselectrons
x4x4
x1.8
antiprotonsantiprotons
EEkk, GeV, GeV
EEkk, GeV, GeV
EEkk, GeV, GeV
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 23 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Longitude Profiles |b|<5°
50-70 MeV
2-4 GeV
0.5-1 GeV
4-10 GeV
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 24 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Background
Predicted vs. observedPredicted vs. observed
E, MeVE, MeV
EE22xFxF
Sreekumar et al. 1998Sreekumar et al. 1998
Strong et al. 2004Strong et al. 2004Elsaesser & Mannheim,
astro-ph/0405235
•Blazars•Cosmological neutralinos
E, GeVE, GeV
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 25 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Conclusions I
Accurate measurements of nuclear species in CR, secondary antiprotons, and diffuse γ-rays simultaneously may provide a new vital information for Astrophysics – in broad sense, Particle Physics, and Cosmology.
Gamma rays: GLAST is scheduled to launch in 2007 – diffuse gamma rays is one of its priority goals
CR species: New measurements at LE & HE simultaneously are highly desirable (Pamela, Super-TIGER, AMS…), also sec. positrons !
Hunter et al. region:l=300°-60°,|b|<10°
Dark Matter
Zh increase
Be10/Be9
EEkk, MeV/nucleon, MeV/nucleon
B/C
EEkk, MeV/nucleon, MeV/nucleon
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 26 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Conclusions II
Antiprotons: Pamela (2005), AMS (2008) and a new BESS-polar instrument to fly a long-duration balloon mission (in 2004, 2006…), we thus will have more accurate and restrictive antiproton data
HE electrons: Several missions are planned to target specifically HE electrons
We must be ready…!GALPROP is a propagation model to
play now; the accuracy depends very much on the accuracy of the nuclear production cross sections
Igor V. Moskalenko/NASA-GSFC 27 Nuclear Data-2004/09/26-10/1 Santa Fe, NM
Thank you !