Nitrogen cycle Biogeochemistry October 17, 2005 Maria Moskalenko, Gretchen Miles, Emily Paduano,...
-
Upload
heather-cannon -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Nitrogen cycle Biogeochemistry October 17, 2005 Maria Moskalenko, Gretchen Miles, Emily Paduano,...
Nitrogen cycle
BiogeochemistryOctober 17, 2005
Maria Moskalenko, Gretchen Miles, Emily Paduano, Jaconette Mirck
OutlineOutline Background Information on N Papers: Kaiser, 2001. The Other Global Pollutant
Agriculture: fertilizer & food Mitsch, 2001. Reducing N loading to Gulf
Mississippi River-hypoxia Solutions to N-pollution
Driscoll, 2003. N Pollution in Northeast US Atmospheric Inputs Estuaries Models
Discussion
Background Information on N Papers: Kaiser, 2001. The Other Global Pollutant
Agriculture: fertilizer & food Mitsch, 2001. Reducing N loading to Gulf
Mississippi River-hypoxia Solutions to N-pollution
Driscoll, 2003. N Pollution in Northeast US Atmospheric Inputs Estuaries Models
Discussion
Nitrogen Forms, Phases and Oxidation States
Nitrogen Forms, Phases and Oxidation States
* *
* NOx, greenhouse gases
Nitrogen the other global pollutant (Kaiser, 2001)
Nitrogen the other global pollutant (Kaiser, 2001)
Essential element for growth/primary production
Surplus nitrogen = pollutantSources:
FertilizerFossil fuels
Results in various problems:Algal bloomGreenhouse gasOzone
Essential element for growth/primary production
Surplus nitrogen = pollutantSources:
FertilizerFossil fuels
Results in various problems:Algal bloomGreenhouse gasOzone
SolutionsSolutions
Increase requirements for fossil fuelsSmaller carsHybrids
Eat less meat to reduce food of live stockLess manure
Food control, precise amino acid ratioReduce runoffIncrease price of fertilizer
Increase requirements for fossil fuelsSmaller carsHybrids
Eat less meat to reduce food of live stockLess manure
Food control, precise amino acid ratioReduce runoffIncrease price of fertilizer
Reducing Nitrogen Loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the
Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to Counter a
Persistent Ecological Problem-Mitsch, et al. 2001
Reducing Nitrogen Loading to the Gulf of Mexico from the
Mississippi River Basin: Strategies to Counter a
Persistent Ecological Problem-Mitsch, et al. 2001
ProblemsProblems
Anthropogenic Additions of N to aquatic systems cause Increased ProductivityEutrophicationHypoxiaFish Kills
Anthropogenic Additions of N to aquatic systems cause Increased ProductivityEutrophicationHypoxiaFish Kills
Solutions: Controlling N in Miss. River Basin
Solutions: Controlling N in Miss. River Basin
Modifying Agricultural Practice- use less fertilizer- apply fertilizer in spring- account for N sources present
Riparian and Wetland Buffers- effective nitrogen sinks due to
high levels of denitrification
Modifying Agricultural Practice- use less fertilizer- apply fertilizer in spring- account for N sources present
Riparian and Wetland Buffers- effective nitrogen sinks due to
high levels of denitrification
Solutions cont.Solutions cont.
Urban & Suburban Non-point Source Control
Point Source Control Controls on Atmospheric NOx
Mississippi River Diversions
Urban & Suburban Non-point Source Control
Point Source Control Controls on Atmospheric NOx
Mississippi River Diversions
Benefits of Reducing Nitrogen Levels in the Mississippi River
Basin
Benefits of Reducing Nitrogen Levels in the Mississippi River
BasinPredicted 40% reduction of nitrogen
loading to the Gulf through implementation of these practices
In addition to reduced hypoxia- reduced river pollution- reduced wetland loss- improved river ecosystems- improved control of floods
Predicted 40% reduction of nitrogen loading to the Gulf through implementation of these practices
In addition to reduced hypoxia- reduced river pollution- reduced wetland loss- improved river ecosystems- improved control of floods
Northeast U.S. Brief History
Northeast U.S. Brief History
Population ChangesLand Use ChangesCapacity of 2nd Growth
Forests for N-retention
Population ChangesLand Use ChangesCapacity of 2nd Growth
Forests for N-retention
N-pollution Sources in Northeast U.S. (Driscoll et
al. 2003)
N-pollution Sources in Northeast U.S. (Driscoll et
al. 2003)Atmospheric N SourcesFood ImportsFertilizer & Farming PracticesFeed ImportsWastewater EffluentMycorrhizae & Legumes
Atmospheric N SourcesFood ImportsFertilizer & Farming PracticesFeed ImportsWastewater EffluentMycorrhizae & Legumes
ProblemsProblems
Acidic Deposition Ground Level Ozone FormationCoastal EutrophicationAcidification & Overfertilization N-
enrichmentForest (N-saturation)Freshwater
(high flow)
Acidic Deposition Ground Level Ozone FormationCoastal EutrophicationAcidification & Overfertilization N-
enrichmentForest (N-saturation)Freshwater
(high flow)
Smog in LA & Chicago
Wet Deposition and Emissions
Wet Deposition and Emissions
a: nitrate, sulfate, b: nitrate & ammonium, c: sulfate, nitrate, chloride
Ozone FormationOzone Formation
For Formation: NOx & VOC’s (volitile organic compounds) Or NO from soil + Oxygen
VOC’s were thought to be limiting factorAutomobile VOC’s are regulated VOC’s are also produced naturally (isoprene)
In Northeast U.S. we now believe that NOx
regulates O3 formationGround Level O3 in many U.S. cities exceeds
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
For Formation: NOx & VOC’s (volitile organic compounds) Or NO from soil + Oxygen
VOC’s were thought to be limiting factorAutomobile VOC’s are regulated VOC’s are also produced naturally (isoprene)
In Northeast U.S. we now believe that NOx
regulates O3 formationGround Level O3 in many U.S. cities exceeds
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Solution: Reductions in NSolution: Reductions in N
Management Options:Coastal Watersheds
Wastewater Treatment PlantsAgriculture
AtmosphereFossil fuel electric utilitiesTransportationAgriculture
Management Options:Coastal Watersheds
Wastewater Treatment PlantsAgriculture
AtmosphereFossil fuel electric utilitiesTransportationAgriculture
Purpose of ModelingPurpose of Modeling
Models were run to test proposed management options and determine their effectiveness
Atmospheric Model: PnET-BGCEstuary Loading: WATERSN
Models were run to test proposed management options and determine their effectiveness
Atmospheric Model: PnET-BGCEstuary Loading: WATERSN
ConclusionsConclusions
Estuary: Major N-sourceWastewater effluent:
Add biotic N-removal to wastewater treatment practices
Atmosphere: Source Specific Control
(due to numerous sources)
Estuary: Major N-sourceWastewater effluent:
Add biotic N-removal to wastewater treatment practices
Atmosphere: Source Specific Control
(due to numerous sources)
Discussion TopicsDiscussion Topics
Ecotechnology PhytoremediationWillow Project
Theoretical Models vs. Real Life Problems? Lifestyle Changes
No Meat = No NitrogenSUV’s, Hybrids,Public Transportation, Walk,
BikeOther Effects of N
Purely Atmospheric take on N- Aerosols
Ecotechnology PhytoremediationWillow Project
Theoretical Models vs. Real Life Problems? Lifestyle Changes
No Meat = No NitrogenSUV’s, Hybrids,Public Transportation, Walk,
BikeOther Effects of N
Purely Atmospheric take on N- Aerosols
Willow ApplicationsWillow Applications Set-aside arable land Bio-remediation of
contaminated soils, like brownfields (phytoremediation)
Nutrient and waste management systems
Windbreaks/snow fences
Buffer zones for clean water
Set-aside arable land Bio-remediation of
contaminated soils, like brownfields (phytoremediation)
Nutrient and waste management systems
Windbreaks/snow fences
Buffer zones for clean water
Incorporating willow biomass crops into riparian buffers produces clean water and renewable energy (Salix Maskiner 2000)
Soil ConservationSoil Conservation
•Very little soil erosion once the crop is established
•Negligible N leaching from established willow plantings, even with large applications nitrogen (Adegbidi 1999, Aronsson et al. 2000).
•Very little soil erosion once the crop is established
•Negligible N leaching from established willow plantings, even with large applications nitrogen (Adegbidi 1999, Aronsson et al. 2000).
One year old coppcie growth
Nitrogen MovementNitrogen Movement
NO3-N (kg/ha)
NH4-N (kg/ha)
Pots with willow growth
4.3 + 2.6 1.3 + 0.2
Pots without willow growth
140.8 +12.9 1.3 + 0.2
p-value <0.01 0.75
NO3-N (kg/ha)
NH4-N (kg/ha)
Pots with willow growth
4.3 + 2.6 1.3 + 0.2
Pots without willow growth
140.8 +12.9 1.3 + 0.2
p-value <0.01 0.75
Trial with organic amendments with nitrogen loads ranging from 200 – 1,880 TKN kg/ha (Adeigbidi 1999)
AerosolsAerosols
GCEP 2004 Orientation Presentation by Jeff Gaffney
What???
Aerosols absorb or scatter light
Ecological Effect
Photosynthesis