Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.
-
Upload
barry-mcdaniel -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.
![Page 1: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Enhanced recovery meta-analysis
Kirsty Cattle
Research Registrar
![Page 3: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The paper
![Page 4: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Introduction
– Enhanced recovery:– A combination of interventions aimed at reducing
the operative stress response, resulting in faster recovery
– Therefore often called the “fast-track programme”
![Page 5: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
– Aim of study:– The evidence for enhanced recovery comes
from observational studies and consensus opinion.
– Previous systematic review was felt to be inadequate
![Page 6: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Methods
– Define colorectal enhanced recovery surgery:– Enhanced recovery elements:
![Page 7: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Methods
– Define colorectal enhanced recovery surgery:– Enhanced recovery elements:– Include five elements, at least one from each of
pre-, peri- and post-operative period– “A circumferential segmental excision of any
part, or parts, of the colon and or rectum involving either a primary anastomosis and or stoma formation”
![Page 9: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
– Identify randomised controlled trials and clinical controlled trials by searching:– Medline, Embase, Cochrane Colorectal Cancer
Group Database, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)
– 1966 to 2006– Review of list of references in relevant articles
![Page 10: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
– Outcomes:– Primary: total primary length of stay– Secondary:
• Primary length of stay plus length of any readmissions• Readmissions• Morbidity• Mortality
– If necessary, data was obtained by contacting the authors directly
![Page 11: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
– Analysis:– Weighted mean difference for continuous data– Relative risk for categorical data– Heterogeneity examined (I2 test)
![Page 12: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Results
– 71 papers assessed, 4 papers included in meta-analysis– 376 patients, 64 within RCTs– 11 deaths
– Bias:– 2 RCTs, both from same centre, inadequacies
with randomization– 2 CCTs, comparing different centres or wards
![Page 13: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Meta-analysis
– Total primary length of stay:– Included RCT data only, therefore 64 patients– Homogenous studies– Both primary length of stay and total stay
secondary to readmissions reduced in enhanced recovery groups:
• Primary LOS reduced by 3.64 (95% CI -4.98 to -2.29) days
• Total 30 day LOS reduced by 3.75 (95% CI -5.11 to -2.40) days
![Page 14: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
– Morbidity:– Lower relative risk of 30 day morbidity among
enhanced recovery group:• RR = 0.44, p < 0.0001, combined RCT and CCT data
– No statistically significant difference when RCTs alone examined
• RR= 0.63, p = 0.06, RCT data only
![Page 16: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
– Mortality:– No significant difference in mortality rates
between enhanced recovery and standard care• RR = 0.92, p = 0.93, RCT data• RR = 2.0, p = 0.32, CCT data
![Page 18: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
– Readmission rates:– Equivocal data reported
• Lower readmission rates among enhanced recovery group reported in one RCT, RR = 0.26, p = 0.21
• Lower readmission rates among control group reported from both CCTs, RR = 1.73, p = 0.05
• Pooled data: RR 1.46, p = 0.15
![Page 19: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Discussion
– Their conclusions match the conclusions of the previous meta-analysis and support it by being a stronger meta-analysis
– Exclusion of non-colorectal papers– Lower heterogeneity– Analysis of total 30-day length of stay
– Morbidity and mortality data should be interpreted with caution due to small numbers
– Difficult to determine if enhanced recovery gives better outcomes due to constituent parts or the overall package
![Page 20: Enhanced recovery meta-analysis Kirsty Cattle Research Registrar.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081519/56649d9d5503460f94a87105/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Critique
– Small numbers, only 4 papers, including only 2 RCTs, both from same centre, 2 years apart.
– Primary outcome based on RCTs only– My conclusions:
– More background reading first