EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

download EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

of 22

Transcript of EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    1/22

    1 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    EE 394J10 Distributed Technologies

    Grid-Microgrids

    Interconnection

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    2/22

    2 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Motivation

    Reasons for connecting a microgrid to a main grid:

    Availability: Highly available power grids may act as an additional

    source for micro-grids. Operations/stability:

    Direct connection of ac microgrids to a large power grid

    facilitates stable operation but only if the power grid acts as a

    stiff source to the microgrid.

    When using renewable energy sources, a grid connection mayallow reducing the need for energy storage in the microgrid.

    If not all loads in a microgrid are critical, a grid connection may

    allow to reduce the investment in local generation.

    Economics:

    Microgrids are typically planned with extra capacity with respect

    to the local load. This extra power capacity can be injected back

    into the grid in order to obtain some economic benefit.

    Grid interconnection allows to reduce fuel operational costs by

    using the grid at night when electricity costs are low.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    3/22

    3 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Definitions

    Point of common coupling (PCC): it is the point in the electric circuit

    where a microgrid is connected to a main grid.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    4/22

    4 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Standards

    There are several standards specifying various aspects grid

    interconnection of a local power generation source. Arguably the most

    important one is IEEE 1547.

    IEEE 1547 has several parts: Main body

    IEEE Standard 1547.1 IEEE Standard Conformance Test Procedures for Equipment

    Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric Power Systems.

    EEE Standard 1547.2 IEEE Application Guide for IEEE Std 1547, IEEE Standard for

    Interconnecting Distributed Resources with Electric Power Systems.

    IEEE Standard 1547.3 IEEE Guide for Monitoring, Information Exchange, and Control of

    Distributed Resources Interconnected with Electric Power Systems.

    IEEE Standard 1547.4 IEEE Guide for Design, Operation, and Integration of Distributed

    Resource Island Systems with Electric Power Systems.

    IEEE Standard 1547.5 has not been issued, yet. Its intended scope is to address issues

    when interconnecting electric power sources of more than 10 MVA to the power grid.IEEE Standard 1547.6 IEEE Recommended Practice for Interconnecting Distributed

    Resources with Electric Power Systems Distribution Secondary Networks.

    IEEE Standard 1547.8 has not been issued, yet. Its intended scope is to provide

    supplemental support for implementation methods for expanded use of the previous

    standards, for example when addressing issues with high penetration of residential PV

    systems.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    5/22

    5 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Standards

    Main provisions from IEEE 1547: The micro-grid must not actively regulate the voltage at the PCC.

    The grounding approach chosen for the local area power and energy system (LAPES) must

    not create overvoltages that exceed the ratings of the equipment connected to the main grid or

    must not affect ground fault protection coordination in the main grid.

    The distributed resources in the LAPES must be able to parallel with the main grid without

    causing voltage fluctuations at the PCC greater than 5% of the prevailing voltage level of the

    Area electric power system (EPS) at the PCC and flicker must be within acceptable ranges.

    The LAPES must not energized the main grid when the main grid is not energized.

    Each distributed resource (DR) unit of 250 kVA or more or DR aggregate of 250 kVA or more

    at a single PCC shall have provisions for monitoring its connection status, real power output,

    reactive power output, and voltage at the point of DR connection.

    A visible-break isolation device must be located between the main grid and a DR unit only

    when required by the main grid provider practices.

    The interconnection system must meet applicable surge and EMI standards.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    6/22

    6 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Standards

    Main provisions from IEEE 1547: When a fault occurs in the main grid circuit to which a LAPES is connected, then the micro-

    grid local power generation units must stop to power this circuit before reclosure from the maingrid happens.

    The interconnection system must be able to measure relevant indicated voltages and

    frequencies at the PCC or the point of connection of DR and disconnect within a given allowed

    time all local power generating units in the micro-grid when these measured voltages or

    frequencies fall within a range specified in a table in this standard. For example, when

    voltages fall below 50 % of the base voltage, the LAPES must disconnect its DR within 0.16

    seconds (one 60 Hz cycle). The time extends to 2 seconds for voltages between 50 and 88 %

    of the base voltage. Disconnection must occur within 1 second if measured voltages are

    between 110 and 120 % of the base voltage and within 0.16 seconds if the voltage exceeds

    120 % of the base voltage. For frequency measurements, any DR of 30 kW or less must

    disconnect 0.16 seconds if the measured frequency is above 60.5 Hz or below 59.3 Hz. The

    same disconnect time applies for DR of more than 30 kW when the frequency exceeds 60.5Hz, but for the lower range at these power levels disconnect within 0.16 seconds must occur if

    the frequency falls below 57 Hz, whereas disconnection is adjustable between 0.16 and 300

    Hz if the frequency falls between 59.8 and 57 Hz.

    Reconnection of a LAPES to a main grid may occur at least 5 minutes after voltages and

    frequency fall within indicated required ranges.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    7/227 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Standards

    Main provisions from IEEE 1547: Reconnection of a LAPES to a main grid may occur at least 5 minutes after voltages and

    frequency fall within indicated required ranges.

    A microgrid must not inject dc current greater than 0.5% of the full rated output current at

    the PCC.

    Harmonic current injection by the LAPES into the main grid measured at the PCC must not

    exceed certain levels both in total and for given harmonic order ranges. The total demand

    distortion must not be more than 5 % of the local main grid maximum load current integrated

    demand (15 or 30 minutes) without the DR unit, or the DR unit rated current capacity,

    whatever is greater. Base of this same base current, harmonic content for harmonics with an

    odd order below 11 must not exceed 4 %. If the odd harmonic order is between 11 and 17 the

    limit is 2 %, whereas this limit falls to 1.5 % for odd harmonics with an order between 17 and

    23 and 0.6 % for odd harmonics with an order between 23 and 35. For odd harmonics with an

    order above 35, the harmonic content with respect to the indicated current must not exceed0.3 %. For even harmonics their content limits are a quarter of those indicated for the odd

    harmonic orders.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    8/228 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Standards

    Other important provisions from IEEE 1547.6 about network

    protections (NP) on the grids side:

    The presence of DR should not:

    - cause any NP to exceed its fault-interrupting capability.

    - cause any NP to operate more frequently than prior to DR operation.

    - prevent or delay the NP from opening for faults on the network feeders.

    - delay or prevent NP closure.

    - require the NP settings to be adjusted except by consent of the area EPSoperator.

    - cause an islanding condition within part of a grid network.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    9/229 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Interconnection methods and technologies

    Interconnection methods:

    Directly through switchgear

    Power electronic interfaces Static switches

    Directly through circuit breakers:

    Relatively simple and inexpensive

    Slow (3 to 6 cycles to achieve a complete disconnection). Since electrical characteristics on both sides of the circuit breakers

    must be the same, then, electrical characteristics on the micro-grid

    side are dependent on the grid characteristics. For example, use of

    a circuit breaker implicitly limits the micro-grid to have, at least

    partially, an ac power distribution system in order to match the grids

    electrical characteristics.

    Power flow through the PCC cannot be controlled

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    10/2210 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Interconnection methods and technologies

    Directly through circuit breakers:

    Example of one of such systems:

    Use of static switches:

    Usually based on SCRs in antiparallel configuration to allow

    bidirectional power flow

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    11/2211 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Interconnection methods and technologies

    Use of static switches:

    They are costlier and more complex than using circuit breakers.

    Usually, conventional circuit breakers are still used to provide away to achieve full galvanic isolation. A Bypass switch is also added

    for maintenance reasons.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    12/2212 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Interconnection methods and technologies

    Use of static switches:

    They allow for many open/close operations

    They act much faster than conventional circuit breakers (in theorder of half a cycle to a cycle). Sometimes IGBTs are used instead

    of SCR because IGBTs tend to be faster than SCRs and their

    current is inherently limited.

    Still power flow cannot be controlled.

    There are some conduction losses in the devices.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    13/2213 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Interconnection methods and technologies

    Power electronic interfaces:

    It is the costlier option but it is also the most flexible one.

    Allow for power distribution architecture characteristics on bothsides of the PCC to be completely different.

    Both real and reactive power flow can be controlled.

    Reaction times to connection or disconnection commands are

    similar to those provided by static switches, although in the case of a

    power electronic circuit, it response also depends on its dynamicperformance, given by its controller, topology, and internal energy

    storage components characteristics.

    Still, in many cases, a circuit breaker will still be required at the

    grid-side terminal of the power electronic interface with a LAPES in

    order to provide a way to physically disconnect the micro-grid from

    the grid.

    Also, similarly to static switches, the presence of a power electronic

    circuit will lead to some power losses not found in the approach

    using mechanical interfaces.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    14/2214 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Grid-connected inverter control

    Consider the following configuration in which it is assumed that we can

    control both real and reactive power can be controlled at the inverter

    (this is not always the case).

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    15/2215 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Grid-connected inverter control

    With a small voltage drop in the grid impedance (so the voltage at the

    PCC, va is fixed and cannot be regulated by the inverter:

    The inverter impedance depends on the inverter output filter

    parameters and the inverter controller.

    In most typical applications, for low frequencies the inverter impedanceis mostly resistive. Hence,

    22 2

    cos sinG INV INV INV G INV INV

    INV INV

    V V R X V RP

    R X

    2

    2 2

    cos sinG INV INV INV G INV

    INV

    INV INV

    V V X R V X Q

    R X

    2,

    cosG INV GINV R

    INV

    V V VP

    R

    ,

    sinG INV INV R

    INV

    V VQ

    R

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    16/2216 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Grid-connected inverter control

    If the inverter is controlled as in most PV grid-tied inverters so their

    power factor is close to 1, then

    Hence,

    If due to the output filter or the controller parameters the inverter

    presents an inductive equivalent series impedance, then

    ,0 0

    INV RQ

    ,

    G INV G

    INV R

    INV

    V V VP

    R

    ,

    sinG INV

    INV X

    INV

    V VP

    X

    2,

    cosG INV G

    INV X

    INV

    V V VQ

    X

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    17/2217 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Grid-connected inverter control

    Condition for unity power factor

    Consider the following triangle based on the above condition:

    Then

    and

    , 0 cosINV X INV GQ V V

    INVV

    GV

    xV

    2 2

    sinINV GX

    INV INV

    V VV

    V V

    2 2

    ,

    G INV G

    INV X

    INV

    V V VP

    X

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    18/2218 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Islanding

    In IEEE Standard 1547.4 an intentional island is said to be the result

    of intentional events for which the time and duration of the plannedisland are agreed upon by all parties involved.

    There are several reasons why intentional island operation of a micro-

    grid may occur, but a common one is a preemptive disconnection from

    the grid in anticipation of a power outage on the main grid side caused

    by an event that can be anticipated, such as an incoming hurricane orstorm, or wildfires. The advantage of this intentional islanding operation

    instead of waiting for the outage in the main grid to occur in order to

    switch the LAPES to operate in islanding mode is that an intentional

    islanding allows for a controlled transition that prevents potential failures

    or quality issues in the micro-grid. Two phases can be distinguished in islanded operation:

    transition from grid connected to island operation

    operation isolated from the grid.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    19/2219 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Islanding

    During the transition into island operation it is important that:

    voltage disturbances are quickly dampened and that protection

    schemes both inside the LAPES and in the grid are not affected.

    When the transition is completed it is important that

    the micro-grid has sufficient local power generation and energy

    storage in order to ensure that loads are powered with the agreed

    quality level. For example, in ac micro-grids it is important that

    distributed resources are able to provide real and reactive power to

    the specified load range. This is particularly important in order to

    avoid loss of stability if there are large motors in the LAPES that

    require significant amounts of reactive power during startup Also for ac micro-grids, their control systems must be able to

    regulate both voltage and frequency within acceptable ranges. In dc

    micro-grids, neither frequency regulation nor reactive power

    generation are issues to consider.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    20/2220 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Islanding

    Eventually, it can be anticipated that the micro-grid would be

    connected to the main grid again. Grid connection of dc micro-grids or

    ac micro-grids with a power electronics interface with the main gridtends to be simpler than the case of ac micro-grids connected to the

    main grid through circuit breakers, contactors, or static switches

    because in the dc micro-grid and the ac micro-grid with a power

    electronics interface cases reconnection control resides only in this

    power electronic interface. That is, the controller in this power electronic

    interface would controlled in order to realize on its grid side some

    voltage waveform so its amplitude, frequency and phase angle are

    within specified limits to allow reconnection.

    In the other ac micro-grid casesthose directly connected to the maingrid though mechanical switchgear or static switchesreconnection is

    more complicated because there is no possibility of directly controlling

    the voltage waveforms at the PCC. In this case, ensuring that the

    voltage, frequency and phase angle are within acceptable limits depend

    on how the LAPES distributed resources are controlled.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    21/2221 Alexis Kwasinski, 2012

    Islanding

    According to IEEE Standard 1547.4 these approaches can be

    distinguished in this case of ac micro-grids in order to achieve a

    successful reconnection: Active synchronization: In this approach, the LAPES controller matches the voltage

    signal on the PCC micro-grid side to those of the PCC on the grid side immediately

    before closing the islanding devices, such as a circuit breaker. Implementation of this

    approach requires measuring these three voltage signal parametersamplitude,

    frequency and phase angleon both sides of the PCC. A communications channel inorder to exchange information between the micro-grid and the main grid is also

    necessary. This need for sensing and communications may lead to a higher failure rate

    as the sensing and communications subsystems may become a single point of failure.

    Passive synchronization: In this approach a device is used to monitor the voltage at

    both sides of the PCC and allows the LAPES to connect to the main grid only when the

    voltage signal on the LAPES side is within some given required range of the main gridanalogous voltage parameters. Like the active synchronization approach, passive

    synchronization requires sensing and communications, leading to the same potential

    reliability concerns. In addition, this method may be slower than active synchronization.

    Open transition: This approach is more basic than the other two, because the method

    involves connecting both ends of the PCC after interrupting disconnecting the LAPES

    load. Once the micro-grid is connected to the grid then this load is brought back online.

  • 7/30/2019 EE394J10 DG Grid Interconnection

    22/22

    22 l i i ki

    Islanding

    According to IEEE Standard 1547.4, un-intentional islanding

    operations are inadvertent events that are typically initiated by loss of

    area EPS or equipment failure, and the DR island system may beautomatically sectionalized from the area EPS by protective equipment.

    Once the island has been established, the same considerations that wereconsidered for the intentional island condition applies to the un-intentional island.

    Contrary to the case of intentional islanding, during an un-intentional island it is

    not possible to prepare the LAPES for such transition, such as verifying that there issufficient local generation to sustain a stable operation powering all loads. Hence,

    in case it is expected that local generation capacity may be insufficient to sustain

    the load during un-intentional islands, black start functions or standby generators

    with transfer switches have to be allocated within the LAPES.

    Once the issue in the main grid that led to loss of service to the micro-grid feederis solved, it may be of interest to reconnect soon the main grid to the micro-grid.

    However, such connection cannot occur until the voltage and frequency of the grid

    are stable and within acceptable ranges. In order to ensure meeting such

    requirement, a delay of up to five minutes may be provided between the time power

    is restored at the PCC from the main grid and the time reconnection to the LAPES

    is established.