DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets...

37
SDMS DocID 529983 DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. SOUTH HOPE, MAINE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN Prepared for U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Waste Programs Enforcement Washington, D.C. 20460 Work Assignment No. EPA Region Site No. Contract No. CDM Federal Programs Corporation Document No. Prepared By Work Assignment Project Manager Telephone No. Primary Contact Telephone Number Date Prepared : 714 : I : IP65 : 68-01-7331 : T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2 : Booz Allen & Hamilton, Inc. Laurie Ziegenfus (301) 951-4533 Michael Jasinski (617) 573-5786 March 11, 1988

Transcript of DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets...

Page 1: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

SDMS DocID 529983

DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY INC

SOUTH HOPE MAINE COMMUNITY RELATIONS PLAN

Prepared for

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Office of Waste Programs Enforcement

Washington DC 20460

Work Assignment No EPA Region Site No Contract No CDM Federal Programs Corporation Document No Prepared By

Work Assignment Project Manager Telephone No Primary Contact Telephone Number Date Prepared

714 I IP65 68-01-7331

T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2 Booz Allen amp Hamilton Inc

Laurie Ziegenfus (301) 951-4533 Michael Jasinski (617) 573-5786 March 11 1988

DISCLAIMER

THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT WHICH HAS NOT RECEIVED FINAL ACCEPTANCE FROM THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OR THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION THE OPINIONS FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS EXPRESSED ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHORS AND NOT THOSE OF THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OR THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTIONmdash PAGE

Purpose i

10 Meeting Logistics - 1

20 Presentations 2

A Laurie Ziegenfus BAH 2 B Michael Jasinski US EPA 2 C Cynthia Kuhns ME DEP 4 D Marilyn D i s i r o ATSDR 5 E Michael Jasinski US EPA 5

30 Questions and Answers 7

40 Unanswered Questions 11

50 Commitments Made 12

60 Suggested Follow-up Community Relations

A c t i v i t i e s 12

70 Lessons Learned 12

Appendix A - Attendance L i s t

Appendix B - Site Fact Sheet

Appendix C - Meeting Agenda

Appendix D - Sampling Data

Appendix E - Meeting Handouts

APPENDIX 14

PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY

PURPOSE

For the US EPA Region I Union Chemical Company Superfund Site Public Meeting at South Hope Elementary School i n South Hope Maine on February 23 1988

The purpose of t h i s Public Meeting Summary i s to provide an inte r n a l record for use in preparing the responsiveness summary as a planning t o o l for future community relations a c t i v i t i e s and as a means of b r i e f i n g new project o f f i c e r s on past community concerns

10 MEETING LOGISTICS

DATE Tuesday February 23 1988

LOCATION South Hope Elementary School Auditorium South Hope Maine

COMMENCED 715 pm

ADJOURNED 930 pm

TOTAL NUMBER OF ATTENDEES 33 bull

SPEAKERS Jasinski M US EPA Kuhns C ME DEP D i s i r i o M ATSDR

Ziegenfus L Booz Allen amp Hamilton

ATTENDEES (See Appendix A)

NOTIFICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Flyer d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988

Site Fact Sheet d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988 (see Appendix B for Site Fact Sheet)

MEETING HANDOUTS (See Appendix E)

- 1 shy

20 PRESENTATIONS

A Laurie Ziegenfus of BAampH meeting moderator opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and thanking everyone for p a r t i c i p a t i n g in the t h i r d EPAState public meeting for the Union Chemical Co Superfund s i t e She explained that t h i s meeting was co-sponsored by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region I and that follow-up meetings w i l l be held to keep the public informed about events at the Union Chemical Co s i t e Ms Ziegenfus explained that t h i s public information meeting would accomplish several objectives

To provide EPA and DEP o f f i c i a l s with the opportunity to communicate to the public on the status of the s i t e

To provide community members with the opportunity to ask questions and hear answers or to have o f f i c i a l s make a commitment to provide lat e r responses

To provide community members with the opportunity to state t h e i r comments andor concerns regarding the s i t e

Ms Ziegenfus introduced the speakers describing each of t h e i r respective roles and reviewed the meeting agenda (See Appendix C for meeting agenda) She also explained that a question-and-answer period would follow the presentations

B Michael Jasinski of the US EPA Region I opened his presentation with a b r i e f explanation of f i r s t his role as the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) and second EPAs re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program He informed the attendees that he started work on the Union Chemical s i t e i n August 1987 and that his involvement has included conducting and overseeing the second and t h i r d rounds of sampling meetings with other o f f i c i a l - s and the responsible parties and community r elations a c t i v i t i e s He explained that as the EPA RPM he w i l l coordinate with Maine DEP and w i l l be a c t i vely involved with the s i t e throughout the response process

Mr Jasinski summarized the recent accomplishments of the re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program which has been underway on a quarterly basis

-2shy

since June 1987 He explained that each round of sampling takes four weeks or more for laboratory analysis and outlined the standard procedure as f ollows^mdash

Samples are collected from designated r e s i d e n t i a l wells

These are sent to the selected laboratory and analyzed within seven days of the date they were taken

Quality assurance procedures are conducted and

The results are submitted to EPA for d i s t r i b u t i o n

Mr Jasinski explained that the f i r s t two rounds of sampling conducted i n JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 included approximately 45 r e s i d e ntial wells w i t h i n a half-mile radius of the s i t e Samples were tested for v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) pesticides and other contaminants The t h i r d round of sampling i n January 1988 focused on those wells that showed the presence of pollutants i n the f i r s t two rounds- and on wells i n t h e i r immediate v i c i n i t y Before t h i s c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t had begun the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) DEP and EPA agreed that only 25 of the o r i g i n a l 45 wells would be included i n the January sampling i n order to focus on the contamination Mr Jasinski explained that the wells to be included i n the fourt h round of sampling i n A p r i l w i l l be determined by the results of the t h i r d round of sampling

Mr Jasinski pointed out that i n each of the f i r s t two rounds of sampling f i v e r e s i d e n t i a l wells showed trace levels of contamination three of which tested p o s i t i v e i n both He then postulated reasons for data inconsistencies One possible explanation is that because of the very low detection levels of a n alytical instruments Used mdash i n the parts per b i l l i o n (ppb) range mdash analytical results can show i n termittent fluctuations and are not consistently dependable for trace amounts of contamination

To date te s t results for the JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 sampling have been published

-3shy

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 2: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

DISCLAIMER

THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT WHICH HAS NOT RECEIVED FINAL ACCEPTANCE FROM THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OR THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION THE OPINIONS FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS EXPRESSED ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHORS AND NOT THOSE OF THE US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OR THE MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTIONmdash PAGE

Purpose i

10 Meeting Logistics - 1

20 Presentations 2

A Laurie Ziegenfus BAH 2 B Michael Jasinski US EPA 2 C Cynthia Kuhns ME DEP 4 D Marilyn D i s i r o ATSDR 5 E Michael Jasinski US EPA 5

30 Questions and Answers 7

40 Unanswered Questions 11

50 Commitments Made 12

60 Suggested Follow-up Community Relations

A c t i v i t i e s 12

70 Lessons Learned 12

Appendix A - Attendance L i s t

Appendix B - Site Fact Sheet

Appendix C - Meeting Agenda

Appendix D - Sampling Data

Appendix E - Meeting Handouts

APPENDIX 14

PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY

PURPOSE

For the US EPA Region I Union Chemical Company Superfund Site Public Meeting at South Hope Elementary School i n South Hope Maine on February 23 1988

The purpose of t h i s Public Meeting Summary i s to provide an inte r n a l record for use in preparing the responsiveness summary as a planning t o o l for future community relations a c t i v i t i e s and as a means of b r i e f i n g new project o f f i c e r s on past community concerns

10 MEETING LOGISTICS

DATE Tuesday February 23 1988

LOCATION South Hope Elementary School Auditorium South Hope Maine

COMMENCED 715 pm

ADJOURNED 930 pm

TOTAL NUMBER OF ATTENDEES 33 bull

SPEAKERS Jasinski M US EPA Kuhns C ME DEP D i s i r i o M ATSDR

Ziegenfus L Booz Allen amp Hamilton

ATTENDEES (See Appendix A)

NOTIFICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Flyer d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988

Site Fact Sheet d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988 (see Appendix B for Site Fact Sheet)

MEETING HANDOUTS (See Appendix E)

- 1 shy

20 PRESENTATIONS

A Laurie Ziegenfus of BAampH meeting moderator opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and thanking everyone for p a r t i c i p a t i n g in the t h i r d EPAState public meeting for the Union Chemical Co Superfund s i t e She explained that t h i s meeting was co-sponsored by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region I and that follow-up meetings w i l l be held to keep the public informed about events at the Union Chemical Co s i t e Ms Ziegenfus explained that t h i s public information meeting would accomplish several objectives

To provide EPA and DEP o f f i c i a l s with the opportunity to communicate to the public on the status of the s i t e

To provide community members with the opportunity to ask questions and hear answers or to have o f f i c i a l s make a commitment to provide lat e r responses

To provide community members with the opportunity to state t h e i r comments andor concerns regarding the s i t e

Ms Ziegenfus introduced the speakers describing each of t h e i r respective roles and reviewed the meeting agenda (See Appendix C for meeting agenda) She also explained that a question-and-answer period would follow the presentations

B Michael Jasinski of the US EPA Region I opened his presentation with a b r i e f explanation of f i r s t his role as the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) and second EPAs re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program He informed the attendees that he started work on the Union Chemical s i t e i n August 1987 and that his involvement has included conducting and overseeing the second and t h i r d rounds of sampling meetings with other o f f i c i a l - s and the responsible parties and community r elations a c t i v i t i e s He explained that as the EPA RPM he w i l l coordinate with Maine DEP and w i l l be a c t i vely involved with the s i t e throughout the response process

Mr Jasinski summarized the recent accomplishments of the re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program which has been underway on a quarterly basis

-2shy

since June 1987 He explained that each round of sampling takes four weeks or more for laboratory analysis and outlined the standard procedure as f ollows^mdash

Samples are collected from designated r e s i d e n t i a l wells

These are sent to the selected laboratory and analyzed within seven days of the date they were taken

Quality assurance procedures are conducted and

The results are submitted to EPA for d i s t r i b u t i o n

Mr Jasinski explained that the f i r s t two rounds of sampling conducted i n JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 included approximately 45 r e s i d e ntial wells w i t h i n a half-mile radius of the s i t e Samples were tested for v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) pesticides and other contaminants The t h i r d round of sampling i n January 1988 focused on those wells that showed the presence of pollutants i n the f i r s t two rounds- and on wells i n t h e i r immediate v i c i n i t y Before t h i s c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t had begun the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) DEP and EPA agreed that only 25 of the o r i g i n a l 45 wells would be included i n the January sampling i n order to focus on the contamination Mr Jasinski explained that the wells to be included i n the fourt h round of sampling i n A p r i l w i l l be determined by the results of the t h i r d round of sampling

Mr Jasinski pointed out that i n each of the f i r s t two rounds of sampling f i v e r e s i d e n t i a l wells showed trace levels of contamination three of which tested p o s i t i v e i n both He then postulated reasons for data inconsistencies One possible explanation is that because of the very low detection levels of a n alytical instruments Used mdash i n the parts per b i l l i o n (ppb) range mdash analytical results can show i n termittent fluctuations and are not consistently dependable for trace amounts of contamination

To date te s t results for the JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 sampling have been published

-3shy

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 3: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTIONmdash PAGE

Purpose i

10 Meeting Logistics - 1

20 Presentations 2

A Laurie Ziegenfus BAH 2 B Michael Jasinski US EPA 2 C Cynthia Kuhns ME DEP 4 D Marilyn D i s i r o ATSDR 5 E Michael Jasinski US EPA 5

30 Questions and Answers 7

40 Unanswered Questions 11

50 Commitments Made 12

60 Suggested Follow-up Community Relations

A c t i v i t i e s 12

70 Lessons Learned 12

Appendix A - Attendance L i s t

Appendix B - Site Fact Sheet

Appendix C - Meeting Agenda

Appendix D - Sampling Data

Appendix E - Meeting Handouts

APPENDIX 14

PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY

PURPOSE

For the US EPA Region I Union Chemical Company Superfund Site Public Meeting at South Hope Elementary School i n South Hope Maine on February 23 1988

The purpose of t h i s Public Meeting Summary i s to provide an inte r n a l record for use in preparing the responsiveness summary as a planning t o o l for future community relations a c t i v i t i e s and as a means of b r i e f i n g new project o f f i c e r s on past community concerns

10 MEETING LOGISTICS

DATE Tuesday February 23 1988

LOCATION South Hope Elementary School Auditorium South Hope Maine

COMMENCED 715 pm

ADJOURNED 930 pm

TOTAL NUMBER OF ATTENDEES 33 bull

SPEAKERS Jasinski M US EPA Kuhns C ME DEP D i s i r i o M ATSDR

Ziegenfus L Booz Allen amp Hamilton

ATTENDEES (See Appendix A)

NOTIFICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Flyer d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988

Site Fact Sheet d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988 (see Appendix B for Site Fact Sheet)

MEETING HANDOUTS (See Appendix E)

- 1 shy

20 PRESENTATIONS

A Laurie Ziegenfus of BAampH meeting moderator opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and thanking everyone for p a r t i c i p a t i n g in the t h i r d EPAState public meeting for the Union Chemical Co Superfund s i t e She explained that t h i s meeting was co-sponsored by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region I and that follow-up meetings w i l l be held to keep the public informed about events at the Union Chemical Co s i t e Ms Ziegenfus explained that t h i s public information meeting would accomplish several objectives

To provide EPA and DEP o f f i c i a l s with the opportunity to communicate to the public on the status of the s i t e

To provide community members with the opportunity to ask questions and hear answers or to have o f f i c i a l s make a commitment to provide lat e r responses

To provide community members with the opportunity to state t h e i r comments andor concerns regarding the s i t e

Ms Ziegenfus introduced the speakers describing each of t h e i r respective roles and reviewed the meeting agenda (See Appendix C for meeting agenda) She also explained that a question-and-answer period would follow the presentations

B Michael Jasinski of the US EPA Region I opened his presentation with a b r i e f explanation of f i r s t his role as the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) and second EPAs re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program He informed the attendees that he started work on the Union Chemical s i t e i n August 1987 and that his involvement has included conducting and overseeing the second and t h i r d rounds of sampling meetings with other o f f i c i a l - s and the responsible parties and community r elations a c t i v i t i e s He explained that as the EPA RPM he w i l l coordinate with Maine DEP and w i l l be a c t i vely involved with the s i t e throughout the response process

Mr Jasinski summarized the recent accomplishments of the re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program which has been underway on a quarterly basis

-2shy

since June 1987 He explained that each round of sampling takes four weeks or more for laboratory analysis and outlined the standard procedure as f ollows^mdash

Samples are collected from designated r e s i d e n t i a l wells

These are sent to the selected laboratory and analyzed within seven days of the date they were taken

Quality assurance procedures are conducted and

The results are submitted to EPA for d i s t r i b u t i o n

Mr Jasinski explained that the f i r s t two rounds of sampling conducted i n JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 included approximately 45 r e s i d e ntial wells w i t h i n a half-mile radius of the s i t e Samples were tested for v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) pesticides and other contaminants The t h i r d round of sampling i n January 1988 focused on those wells that showed the presence of pollutants i n the f i r s t two rounds- and on wells i n t h e i r immediate v i c i n i t y Before t h i s c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t had begun the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) DEP and EPA agreed that only 25 of the o r i g i n a l 45 wells would be included i n the January sampling i n order to focus on the contamination Mr Jasinski explained that the wells to be included i n the fourt h round of sampling i n A p r i l w i l l be determined by the results of the t h i r d round of sampling

Mr Jasinski pointed out that i n each of the f i r s t two rounds of sampling f i v e r e s i d e n t i a l wells showed trace levels of contamination three of which tested p o s i t i v e i n both He then postulated reasons for data inconsistencies One possible explanation is that because of the very low detection levels of a n alytical instruments Used mdash i n the parts per b i l l i o n (ppb) range mdash analytical results can show i n termittent fluctuations and are not consistently dependable for trace amounts of contamination

To date te s t results for the JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 sampling have been published

-3shy

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 4: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY

PURPOSE

For the US EPA Region I Union Chemical Company Superfund Site Public Meeting at South Hope Elementary School i n South Hope Maine on February 23 1988

The purpose of t h i s Public Meeting Summary i s to provide an inte r n a l record for use in preparing the responsiveness summary as a planning t o o l for future community relations a c t i v i t i e s and as a means of b r i e f i n g new project o f f i c e r s on past community concerns

10 MEETING LOGISTICS

DATE Tuesday February 23 1988

LOCATION South Hope Elementary School Auditorium South Hope Maine

COMMENCED 715 pm

ADJOURNED 930 pm

TOTAL NUMBER OF ATTENDEES 33 bull

SPEAKERS Jasinski M US EPA Kuhns C ME DEP D i s i r i o M ATSDR

Ziegenfus L Booz Allen amp Hamilton

ATTENDEES (See Appendix A)

NOTIFICATIONS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Flyer d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988

Site Fact Sheet d i s t r i b u t e d to Union Chemical Mailing L i s t February 16 1988 (see Appendix B for Site Fact Sheet)

MEETING HANDOUTS (See Appendix E)

- 1 shy

20 PRESENTATIONS

A Laurie Ziegenfus of BAampH meeting moderator opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and thanking everyone for p a r t i c i p a t i n g in the t h i r d EPAState public meeting for the Union Chemical Co Superfund s i t e She explained that t h i s meeting was co-sponsored by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region I and that follow-up meetings w i l l be held to keep the public informed about events at the Union Chemical Co s i t e Ms Ziegenfus explained that t h i s public information meeting would accomplish several objectives

To provide EPA and DEP o f f i c i a l s with the opportunity to communicate to the public on the status of the s i t e

To provide community members with the opportunity to ask questions and hear answers or to have o f f i c i a l s make a commitment to provide lat e r responses

To provide community members with the opportunity to state t h e i r comments andor concerns regarding the s i t e

Ms Ziegenfus introduced the speakers describing each of t h e i r respective roles and reviewed the meeting agenda (See Appendix C for meeting agenda) She also explained that a question-and-answer period would follow the presentations

B Michael Jasinski of the US EPA Region I opened his presentation with a b r i e f explanation of f i r s t his role as the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) and second EPAs re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program He informed the attendees that he started work on the Union Chemical s i t e i n August 1987 and that his involvement has included conducting and overseeing the second and t h i r d rounds of sampling meetings with other o f f i c i a l - s and the responsible parties and community r elations a c t i v i t i e s He explained that as the EPA RPM he w i l l coordinate with Maine DEP and w i l l be a c t i vely involved with the s i t e throughout the response process

Mr Jasinski summarized the recent accomplishments of the re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program which has been underway on a quarterly basis

-2shy

since June 1987 He explained that each round of sampling takes four weeks or more for laboratory analysis and outlined the standard procedure as f ollows^mdash

Samples are collected from designated r e s i d e n t i a l wells

These are sent to the selected laboratory and analyzed within seven days of the date they were taken

Quality assurance procedures are conducted and

The results are submitted to EPA for d i s t r i b u t i o n

Mr Jasinski explained that the f i r s t two rounds of sampling conducted i n JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 included approximately 45 r e s i d e ntial wells w i t h i n a half-mile radius of the s i t e Samples were tested for v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) pesticides and other contaminants The t h i r d round of sampling i n January 1988 focused on those wells that showed the presence of pollutants i n the f i r s t two rounds- and on wells i n t h e i r immediate v i c i n i t y Before t h i s c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t had begun the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) DEP and EPA agreed that only 25 of the o r i g i n a l 45 wells would be included i n the January sampling i n order to focus on the contamination Mr Jasinski explained that the wells to be included i n the fourt h round of sampling i n A p r i l w i l l be determined by the results of the t h i r d round of sampling

Mr Jasinski pointed out that i n each of the f i r s t two rounds of sampling f i v e r e s i d e n t i a l wells showed trace levels of contamination three of which tested p o s i t i v e i n both He then postulated reasons for data inconsistencies One possible explanation is that because of the very low detection levels of a n alytical instruments Used mdash i n the parts per b i l l i o n (ppb) range mdash analytical results can show i n termittent fluctuations and are not consistently dependable for trace amounts of contamination

To date te s t results for the JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 sampling have been published

-3shy

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 5: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

20 PRESENTATIONS

A Laurie Ziegenfus of BAampH meeting moderator opened the meeting by welcoming attendees and thanking everyone for p a r t i c i p a t i n g in the t h i r d EPAState public meeting for the Union Chemical Co Superfund s i t e She explained that t h i s meeting was co-sponsored by the Maine Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region I and that follow-up meetings w i l l be held to keep the public informed about events at the Union Chemical Co s i t e Ms Ziegenfus explained that t h i s public information meeting would accomplish several objectives

To provide EPA and DEP o f f i c i a l s with the opportunity to communicate to the public on the status of the s i t e

To provide community members with the opportunity to ask questions and hear answers or to have o f f i c i a l s make a commitment to provide lat e r responses

To provide community members with the opportunity to state t h e i r comments andor concerns regarding the s i t e

Ms Ziegenfus introduced the speakers describing each of t h e i r respective roles and reviewed the meeting agenda (See Appendix C for meeting agenda) She also explained that a question-and-answer period would follow the presentations

B Michael Jasinski of the US EPA Region I opened his presentation with a b r i e f explanation of f i r s t his role as the Remedial Project Manager (RPM) and second EPAs re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program He informed the attendees that he started work on the Union Chemical s i t e i n August 1987 and that his involvement has included conducting and overseeing the second and t h i r d rounds of sampling meetings with other o f f i c i a l - s and the responsible parties and community r elations a c t i v i t i e s He explained that as the EPA RPM he w i l l coordinate with Maine DEP and w i l l be a c t i vely involved with the s i t e throughout the response process

Mr Jasinski summarized the recent accomplishments of the re s i d e n t i a l well sampling program which has been underway on a quarterly basis

-2shy

since June 1987 He explained that each round of sampling takes four weeks or more for laboratory analysis and outlined the standard procedure as f ollows^mdash

Samples are collected from designated r e s i d e n t i a l wells

These are sent to the selected laboratory and analyzed within seven days of the date they were taken

Quality assurance procedures are conducted and

The results are submitted to EPA for d i s t r i b u t i o n

Mr Jasinski explained that the f i r s t two rounds of sampling conducted i n JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 included approximately 45 r e s i d e ntial wells w i t h i n a half-mile radius of the s i t e Samples were tested for v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) pesticides and other contaminants The t h i r d round of sampling i n January 1988 focused on those wells that showed the presence of pollutants i n the f i r s t two rounds- and on wells i n t h e i r immediate v i c i n i t y Before t h i s c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t had begun the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) DEP and EPA agreed that only 25 of the o r i g i n a l 45 wells would be included i n the January sampling i n order to focus on the contamination Mr Jasinski explained that the wells to be included i n the fourt h round of sampling i n A p r i l w i l l be determined by the results of the t h i r d round of sampling

Mr Jasinski pointed out that i n each of the f i r s t two rounds of sampling f i v e r e s i d e n t i a l wells showed trace levels of contamination three of which tested p o s i t i v e i n both He then postulated reasons for data inconsistencies One possible explanation is that because of the very low detection levels of a n alytical instruments Used mdash i n the parts per b i l l i o n (ppb) range mdash analytical results can show i n termittent fluctuations and are not consistently dependable for trace amounts of contamination

To date te s t results for the JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 sampling have been published

-3shy

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 6: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

since June 1987 He explained that each round of sampling takes four weeks or more for laboratory analysis and outlined the standard procedure as f ollows^mdash

Samples are collected from designated r e s i d e n t i a l wells

These are sent to the selected laboratory and analyzed within seven days of the date they were taken

Quality assurance procedures are conducted and

The results are submitted to EPA for d i s t r i b u t i o n

Mr Jasinski explained that the f i r s t two rounds of sampling conducted i n JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 included approximately 45 r e s i d e ntial wells w i t h i n a half-mile radius of the s i t e Samples were tested for v o l a t i l e organic compounds (VOCs) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) pesticides and other contaminants The t h i r d round of sampling i n January 1988 focused on those wells that showed the presence of pollutants i n the f i r s t two rounds- and on wells i n t h e i r immediate v i c i n i t y Before t h i s c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t had begun the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) DEP and EPA agreed that only 25 of the o r i g i n a l 45 wells would be included i n the January sampling i n order to focus on the contamination Mr Jasinski explained that the wells to be included i n the fourt h round of sampling i n A p r i l w i l l be determined by the results of the t h i r d round of sampling

Mr Jasinski pointed out that i n each of the f i r s t two rounds of sampling f i v e r e s i d e n t i a l wells showed trace levels of contamination three of which tested p o s i t i v e i n both He then postulated reasons for data inconsistencies One possible explanation is that because of the very low detection levels of a n alytical instruments Used mdash i n the parts per b i l l i o n (ppb) range mdash analytical results can show i n termittent fluctuations and are not consistently dependable for trace amounts of contamination

To date te s t results for the JuneJuly 1987 and OctoberNovember 1987 sampling have been published

-3shy

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 7: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

(See Appendix D for t e s t results and the corresponding map that i d e n t i f i e s wells i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling program) He informed attendees that the results~ftorn the January round of sampling are not yet available but w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d to the public as soon as they are received

The fourth round of sampling is scheduled to take place i n A p r i l 1988 EPA may involve the contracting f i r m that the responsible parties have hired to conduct the Remedial I n v e s t i g a t i o n F e a s i b i l i t y Study (RIFS) Canonie Environmental since they w i l l eventually assume f u l l r e s p o n s i b i l i t y for the r e s i d ential well sampling program

Mr Jasinski concluded t h i s portion of his presentation with EPAs response to a l e t t e r recently received from the Town of Hope requesting that a l t e rnative drinking water be provided for residents whose wells showed trace levels of contamination He explained t h a t at t h i s time the low levels of contamination detected i n the r e s i d e n t i a l well water do not pose a s i g n i f i c a n t health hazard therefore EPA cannot now comply with the request

Cynthia Kuhns of Maine DEP gave a presentation on DEPs ground-water monitoring program and reviewed preliminary results and conclusions

She-explained that Maine DEP i n s t a l l e d three sets of well clusters on s i t e i n 1986 The well clusters consist of a series of shallow wells (10-15 feet below the surface) intermediate-depth wells (15-30 feet below the surface) and deep wells (15 feet into the underlying bedrock) This positioning w i l l allow DEP to examine the d i f f e r e n t ground-water regimes since people obtain water from d i f f e r e n t depths

Ms Kuhns explained that the DEP monitoring program targets on-site wells and several wells east of Quiggle Brook She indicated that on-site wells continue to show high levels of contaminants which was expected and that two wells east the brook have begun to show low levels of contamination

Preliminary results reveal inconclusive evidence for contamination east of the brook due i n part to numerous variables i n the ground-water hydrogeology She explained that the local ground water appears to be flowing i n a southeasterly d i r e c t i o n toward Quiggle

-4shy

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 8: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

Brook and DEP believes i t is migrating upward into the Brook - Also very low levels of contamination have been detected across Quiggle Brook consisting of xylenebenzene and toulene which are components of gasoline and DEP is not certain that these substances have migrated from the Union Chemical Co s i t e She requested that anyone with knowledge of possible a l t e r n a t i v e sources of t h i s contamination such as an underground gasoline tank contact DEP with t h i s information since there i s uncertainty regarding the source of t h i s contamination

She stated that Maine DEP has not come toa d e f i n i t i v e conclusion regarding contamination of ground water

D Marilyn D i s i r i o of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) i n Atlanta Georgia gave a b r i e f overview of Superfund health assessments and informed the participants that ATSDR has developed a Draft Health Assessment on the Union Chemical s i t e i n response to a c i t i z e n p e t i t i o n She explained that the d r a f t health assessment i s based i n part on ATSDRs review of the health survey conducted by the State of Maine i n 1983

She b r i e f l y explained that a Superfund health assessment i s not based on individual health rather on the population i n a general sense I t i d e n t i f i e s general health problems and examines the mo b i l i t y of contamination possible contamination routes and levels of exposure ATSDR does not yet have complete data on aspects of the food chain however she explained that a health assessment i s an i t e r a t i v e process which w i l l continue through the s i t e remediation process and that additional data w i l l continue to be gathered

Ms D i s i r i o d i s t r i b u t e d copies of the draft health assessment for the Union Chemical Co s i t e and announced that the ATSDR w i l l hold a separate public-meeting i n the South Hope Elementary School on March 10-at 700 pm to provide community residents with the opportunity to discuss health issues with ATSDR o f f i c i a l s Among the o f f i c i a l s attending the meeting to answer questions w i l l be s c i e n t i s t s engineers t o x i c o l o g i s t s and other health s p e c i a l i s t s

E Michael Jasinski of theUS EPA concluded the presentation section of the meeting with an update on specific programmatic aspects of the Union Chemical s i t e These topics included

-5shy

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 9: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

The Trust Fund The s e t t l i n g parties have established a $125 m i l l i o n t r u s t fund and have chosen Canonie Environmental to conduct the s i t e RIFS The Administrative Orders signed November 4 1987 and January 13 1988 outline the r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s of the s e t t l i n g parties and d i r e c t t h e i r actions

The RIFS The RIFS work plan i s currently undergoing f i n a l revisions after which i t w i l l be made available for public comment I t w i l l then be revised i f needed and RIFS work w i l l commence at the s i t e

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA recently met w ith the s e t t l i n g parties to review DEP ground-water sampling data and discuss RIFS a c t i v i t i e s These parties are w i l l i n g to continue ground-water t e s t i n g to modify interceptor trench and to consider taking action to contain the plume of contaminated ground water so that i t w i l l not migrate across Quiggle Brook According to Mr Jasinski the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s w i l l include additional ground-water sampling a i r - q u a l i t y t e s t i n g and the conduct of a baseline r i s k assessment to evaluate i n d i v i d u a l risks posed by drinking water ( d i f f e r e n t from ATSDRs health assessment) He also t o l d attendees that RIFS a c t i v i t i e s may s t a r t i n A p r i l 1988

The Information Repository Mr Jasinski also discussed the location of the s i t e information repository explaining that EPA has checked into housing i t at several locations however there have been numerous complications He announced that i t w i l l be housed at least temporarily i n the Hope Town Office and i d e n t i f i e d the materials to be included i n the repository such as the CRP the Administrative Orders and other

_ s i t e - s p e c i f i c documents

The Site Hotline He announced that a Union Chemical s i t e hotline has been established for the communitys use the phone number i s (207) 785-8000 Community members can leave messages on the answering machine which w i l l be monitored once a day and someone

-6shy

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 10: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

w i l l contact the c a l l e r with a response The hotline may provide more information as events occur

NPL Status Mr Jasinski r e i t e r a t e d the NPL status of the Union Chemical s i t e which i s summarized i n the Site Fact Sheet February 1988 Appendix B

30 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

The following section summarizes questions and answers and comments and responses made during the meeting Questions and comments have been paraphased and grouped by subject into the following categories

Residential well sampling re s u l t s

Ground-water monitoring

Past s i t e history and

Miscellaneous

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS

Past Sampling Results

Several questions were asked concerning the results of the residential- well sampling program These questions include

C l a r i f i c a t i o n on the date of the sampling r esults presented i n the handout

Which sampling results that showed presence of chloroform

Whether a l l r e s i d e n t i a l wells should i n f a c t not be tested again since chloroform was detected i n the Foggs we l l

The respective answers provided to these questions include

Mr Jasinski explained that JuneJuly 1987 results were provided i n the handout

Mr Jasinski c l a r i f i e d that the OctoberNovember 1987 results detected chloroform i n the Foggs w e l l although t h i s does not appear to be a

-7shy

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 11: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

result of contamination from the Union Chemical Co s i t e He also explained that the t e s t i n g i t i n e r a r y is based i n part on r esults from previous sampling therefore a dditional wells may be included i n l a t e r c o l l e c t i o n e f f o r t s

One questioner asked i f there is an explanation for the d i s t r i b u t i o n of contamination and stated that i t seems odd that there appears to be no pattern to the incidence of occurrence

Mr Jasinski responded that EPA and the State do not have a conclusive explanation given the l i m i t e d e x i s ting knowledge Some possible explanations of the pattern of flow have been advanced but there i s no d e f i n i t i v e supporting evidence because instrumentation cannot always detect low levels of contamination and the sampling conditions have been variable He also explained that the flow of ground water i s not yet mapped however EPA and the State are working on g e tting a f u l l picture

Another questioner asked whether i t has been determined whether those wells that tested p o s i t i v e are showing the beginning middle or end of the migrating plume of contamination and he stated that he believes the citizens have the r i g h t to know t h i s f a c t

Mr Jasinski replied that from his review of a l l the data and h i s t o r y of test r e s u l t s t h i s determination cannot be made but w i l l be the subject of investigation during the RIFS

Revising Sample SizeStructure

Several questions were asked concerning the current and future structure andor size of the sampling universe One questioner asked why a l l 43-45 wells w i l l not continue to be tested because the flow of ground water has not yet been determined another stated that complete sampling would be worthwhile i f only for the residents peace of mind Another questioner asked whether EPA w i l l include a well i n the sampling round i f the resident s p e c i f i c a l l y requests that hisher well to be tested and a second followed up by asking given the p o t e n t i a l flow of contamination how w i l l EPA know i f a well i s contaminated without te s t i n g i t s p e c i f i c a l l y

Mr Jasinski explained that the most recent sampling structure has been selected to focus on the

-8shy

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 12: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

suspected f i e l d of contaminationthe r e s i d e n t i a l wells chosen for sampling l i e along Route 17 and are bordered by homes whose wells have tested posi t i v e He strlaquoampsed that a l l 45 of the o r i g i n a l r e s i d e n t i a l wells i n the test have been tested twice and only 5 i n each have showed low levels of contaminants He indicated that the results of the t h i r d round of sampling w i l l determine i n part the sampling f i e l d for the fourth round of sampling and explained tha t as a r e s u l t the exact wells to be included that time have not yet been determined Therefore i f EPA detects contamination i n nearby wells consideration w i l l be given to t e s t i n g others nearby i n the next sampling round

Next Sampling

Questions were asked regarding when the next round of sampling i s scheduled to begin and whether a l l the re s i d e n t i a l wells w i l l be tested at that time

Mr Jasinski replied that EPA w i l l probably choose 25 wells to sample depending upon the results of previous tests however consideration has been given to sampling additional wells i f the pattern of contamination appears to be changing

SITE HISTORY

One attendee made several comments on the s i t e h i s t o r y portion of the EPA Fact Sheet on the Union Chemical Co s i t e These included

The fact sheet states that most on-site a c t i v i t y took place w i t h i n a 125-acre area when instead the area of heaviest a c t i v i t y was approximately 5 acres EPA should therefore also focus i t s investigations on other contaminated areas including the septic system bulldozed barrels the former o i l bulking tanks Quiggle Brook the swamp and the s i t e garage

The h i s t o r y of s i t e incineration i s incomplete In r e a l i t y b o i l e r incineraters were i n continuous operation at the Union Chemical Company from 1967 to 1980 the f i r s t of which became operative i n 1967 the second i n 1968 and the t h i r d i n 1970 The commenter also expressed general concern about a i r emissions from the b o i l e r s and the experimental incinerator s t a t i n g that the areas where emission ash was dumped probably contain high levels of heavy metals and other contaminants

-9shy

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 13: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP are looking at_and w i l l continue to investigate other s i t e areas however he stated that after the fence was constructed most a c t i v i t i e s took place w i t h i n the fenced area He also explained that the fact sheet of necessity had to condense a large amount of s i t e information so that i t was unable to explain a l l the relevant d e t a i l s

GROUND WATER

There were specific questions asked regarding ground-water monitoring results as well as c l a r i f i c a t i o n requested regarding the flow of ground water One questioner asked what contaminants were found i n monitoring well No B-7 east of the Brook and followed up by asking whether the contamination was i n the bedrock Another attendee requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n on the di r e c t i o n of the contamination movement and commented that EPA and DEP should recognize that o f f - s i t e migration i s occurring and that an abatement e f f o r t should begin concurrent with the RIFS S t i l l another asked how bedrock contamination migrates

Several panelists responded to t h i s series of questions Ms Kuhns of Maine DEP answered that the November test revealed methylethyketone at 15 ppb i n well No B-7 however she explained that since i t has not been confirmed with follow-up sampling additional t e s t i n g i s needed Regarding contamination i n the bedrock Ms Kuhns said that the presence of contaminants has been detected but that i t s extent i s not known She also responded to the comment regarding ground-water flow explaining that there i s c urrently no conclusive evidence on i t s d i r e c t i o n Mr Jasinski explained that EPA and DEP have discussed with the s e t t l i n g parties the p o s s i b i l i t y of stepping up abatement e f f o r t s including modifying the interceptor trench Ms Kuhns also explained b r i e f l y that migration through bedrock can occur through fractures and cracks

Miscellaneous

A respresentative of the Concerned Citizens of Hope requested c l a r i f i c a t i o n regarding the l e t t e r and meeting on provision of alternative drinking water to the community The commentor explained that the Concerned Citizens of Hope had w r i t t e n a l e t t e r to the Town of Hope asking for support of a request to EPA to finance alternative drinking water The commentor further stated that the group did not receive a

-10shy

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 14: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

response from the Town Office but did receive a response d i r e c t l y from US EPA which denied the request The representative explained that the Concerrtsecta~Citizens had not intended to submit t h i s l e t t e r to EPA but that i t s submission had been made by the Town of Hope In addition the Concerned Citizens representative indicated that t h i s issue had become unduly complex and was hopeful that the request for water provisions and a meeting between c i t i z e n s and o f f i c i a l s i s s t i l l a p o s s i b i l i t y

Both EPA and DEP representatives responded Mr Jasinski said that EPA received the l e t t e r however at t h i s time EPA does not believe that an a l t ernative water source i s needed and cannot comply with the request Ms Kuhns said that DEP i s s t i l l supporting the p o s s i b i l i t y of a meeting

There were some general questions regarding the use of water p u r i f y i n g systems on residents taps One questioner stated that Dr Leppe recommended i n s t a l l i n g water p u r i f i e r s and asked who would pay for t h i s service another asked about the effectiveness of an activated carbon f i l t e r s t i l l another asked about the effectiveness of a i r f i l t r a t i o n as a method of treatment

Responses were provided by several panelists Mr Jasinski explained that EPA does not consider an activated carbon f i l t e r necessary given the current levels of contamination and therefore EPA w i l l not pay for the i n s t a l l a t i o n Louise House from ATSDR stated the purifyer w i l l not remove VOCs only s a l t s and cautioned residents who do i n s t a l l such a system to give s t r i c t attention to i t s maintenance Mr Webster from US EPA explained that the effectiveness depends upon the standards the u n i t had to meet and that standards vary from state to state In addition he explained that other compounds involved might hinder i t s effectiveness and that no one has ever t r i e d to t r e a t for contaminants i n the 2 ppb range therefore the effectiveness of treatment method is not known

40 UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

Questions regarding the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling were not answered because the results have not come back from the lab

-11 shy

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 15: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

50 COMMITMENTS MADE

Mr Jasinski committed to providing the residents with results^Trom the t h i r d round of r e s i d e n t i a l well sampling as soon as the data are available He w i l l send the results to each household whose well was tested and the information w i l l be provided i n the next s i t e fact sheet

60 SUGGESTED FOLLOW-UP COMMUNITY RELATIONS ACTIVITIES

Upcoming community relations a c t i v i t i e s include the following

Update the Union Chemical Site Mailing L i s t

Once the RIFS work plan has been f i n a l i z e d EPA and DEP w i l l hold a public meeting to provide d e t a i l s on the RIFS a c t i v i t i e s

A fact sheet on the RIFS work plan w i l l be developed and d i s t r i b u t e d to individuals on the Union Chemical Mailing L i s t and w i l l also be sent to Shaws Trading Post and the Hope Town Office for d i s t r i b u t i o n

The Union Chemical s i t e h o t l i n e w i l l be available to a l l community members and w i l l provide them with a status report as events occur

70 LESSONS LEARNED

Several lessons were learned These include

The use of a meeting moderator proved very e f f e c t i v e especially to f a c i l i t a t e the question and answer section of the meeting recognizing a l l attendees i n an impartial manner and to control the meeting

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n - of the meeting agenda up f r o n t i n d i c a t i n g that attendees should hold questions u n t i l the conclusion of the presentations c l a r i f i e d the format for a l l attendees and enabled the meeting to proceed i n a useful manner

I t i s useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s before the meeting to i d e n t i f y a procedureto integrate Dr Leppe on the speakerphone into the meeting l i k e otherparticipants

-12shy

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 16: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

I t -was useful to coordinate with Town o f f i c i a l s and the Concerned Citizens of Hope before the meeting to ensure minimal c o n f l i c t s regarding meeting l o g i s t i c s and other subjects

-13shy

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 17: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

APPENDIX

- 1 4 shy

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 18: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

APPENDIX A

MEETING ATTENDEES

Webster D Aho H House L Feinberg E Blanchard C Jones J Rocki J Smith R Massery L Paradee K Bertucci T G i i l i s U Larner C Stanley J Bentley N S t a r r e t t C Morrissey Staples R Brown W Chase H DellaPenna C Snow R M e r r i f i e l d I Connon P Wellman R Wellman D Bowman S Johnston M Burr G

US EPA ME DEP ATSDR BAampH South Hope 1st Selectman South Hope Selectman Canonie Environmental Union Chemical Site Trustee Site Steering Committee Trustee Representative-Congressman Brennan Representative-Senator Mitchel l Concerned Citizens of Hope Concerned Citizens of Hope

Bangor Daily News

O f f i c i a l s Individuals to add to Mailing L i s t

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 19: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

APPENDIX B

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 20: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

SUPERFUND PI EPA FACT SHEET REGION I

Union Chemical Company Site South Hope Maine February 1988

JINTRODUCTION ing licenses DEP closed the waste treatment operashy

tions in June 1984 at which time approximately 2400shyThis fact sheet provides the mostrecent information on 3000 55-gallon drums and 30 liquid storage tanks were several activities that the US Environmental Protecshy stored on the site DEP took posession of the Union tion Agency (EPA) and the Maine Department of Chemical site in the Fall of 1986 and all site operations Environmental Protection (DEP) have undertaken at ceased the Union Chemical Company Inc site in South Hope Maine Joint response actions by EPA and DEP taken after

hazardous waste treatment operations ceased in June Words in the text that appear in boldface are defined in 1984 have resulted in theremoval of all barrels and the glossary of terms on page 3 liquids from the site Environmental sampling shows

that site ground water surface water and soils have SITE HISTORY been contaminated by past operations The Union

Chemical site was proposed in April 1985 for inclusion The Union Chemical Company Inc site occupies on EPAs Superfund National Priorities List (NPL) the approximately 12 acres along Route 17 west of South roster of sites eligible for long-term cleanup funds Hope Maine in Knox County Most of the Union Chemical Companys past site activities took place RESIDENTIAL W E L L SAMPLING within a 125-acre fenced area that enclosed the plants PROGRAM office and waste handling facilities

In June and July 1987 EPA began a quarterly program The Union Chemical Co was incorporated in 1967 as to sampleresidential wells near the Union Chemical a paint stripping and solvent manufacturing business site A second round of testing was conducted in Eventually the company expanded operations to inshy October and November 1987 Approximately 45 resishyclude treatment of its own used stripping compounds dential wells were sampled each time and analyses and solvents from other businesses In 1980 waste were performed for volatile organic compounds treatment operations were expanded to include an inshy inorganics semivolatiles and polychlorinated cinerator biphenyls (PCBs)pesticides

Between 1979 and 1984 the plant was cited by the DEP Results from the June-July tests determined that five for deficiencies in andor violations of several operatshy wells contained trace levels of several volatile organic

compounds specifically 1 1-dichloroethane 1 2shySITE HOTLINE dichloroethane 11 l-trichloroethane methylene EPA will be establishing a 24-hour hotline specifically to chloride and trichloroethylene Analyses conducted answer the publics questions on the Union Chemical site in October-November 1987 confirmed low levels of The hotline will allow residents of the Hope area to dial a volatile organics in three of the five wells showing trace local telephone number and to leave messages for EPA or levels in June-July while the remaining two wells DEP personnel Agency staff will monitor the hotline to showed no volatile organic contamination Two addishycollect messages and responses will be provided as tional wells tested indicated low levels of chloroform

promptly as possible The public will be notified of the and toluene At present these trace levels do not number to call as soon as the hotline is installed present a risk to the health of the affected residents

Page 1 I

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 21: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

I PA conducted the third quarterly sampling effort on

January 25-27 1988 Results should be available by ate February or early March

STATE I N V O L V E M E N T

Itie Maine DEP is a very active participant in all phases

of work at the Union Chemical site The DEP is a party o both Administrative Orders involving 288 potenshyially responsible parties As such DEP and EPA will

continue to review all documents produced by the ^potentially responsible parties and their contractor bullncluding the Remedial InvestigationFeasibility Study (RIFS) work plan

(i addition the Maine DEP has also played a critical t l i ale in monitoring on-site ground-water contatiiinashy

on The DEP has been sampling selected on-site round-water monitoring wells to determine the level f ground-water contamination and its possible mi-

iration off site DEP sampling is anticipated to conshynue until the settling parties assume responsibility for tonitoring those wells during the RIFS

tO T E N T I A L L Y R E S P O N S I B L E P A R T Y W O L V E M E N T

tA and the Maine DEP have recently (November 4 87 and January 131988) entered into two Adminshy

istrative Orders with 288 potentially responsible bulluties for the Union Chemical site In these orders the

Vj^haMs a Remedial InvestigationFeasibility

I

(IEPA characterizes the problems at a site on the NPL by

nducting a REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION (RI) Characshyistics of both the site and the wastes are identified providshy

ing information EPA requires in order to select a remedy in FEASIBILITY STUDY (FS) Canonie Environmental of rter IN has recently been selected by the 288 settling lies toperform theRIandFS for the Union Chemical site

IRI is a comprehensive study performed by many experts luding biologists hydrogeologists engineers chemists

and health scientists The RI is conducted to determine such features as its geologic setting (ie whether the bedrock

ier the site is intact or fractured) its hydrogeologic pat-is (ie whether and how contaminants might travel

tfuough ground water to nearby streams and rivers) its land m (ie whether it is remote or farmland or urban etc) its bullected biological populations (ie wildlife) and human populations

Ground-Water Monitoring Results of Union Chemical Test Wells

The most recent DEP sampling of selected Union Chemical monitoring wells took place in November 1987 (wells B-7 B-8 B-10 B- l l and B-12 were sampled see the site map on page 5 for well placement) Results indicate that on-site wells continue to show high levels of volatile organic compounds In addition theNovember sampling showed low levels of volatile organic compounds in two monitoring wells (B-7 and B-ll) located east of Quiggle Brook one a bedrock well (B-7) and the other (B-ll) shows volatile organic compounds in water taken very near the ground surface

settling parties agreed to reimburse EPA and the State of Maine for the majority of past response costs inshycurred and to finance the upcoming RIFS

The settling parties have established a $125 million trust fund to pay for the RIFS and oversight of these acshytivities Additionally a group of trustees has been selected to manage the fund and a Steering Committee has been formed to monitor the trustees interactions with EPA and the State They have also obtained the services of Canonie Environmental to conduct the RJ FS _

The trustees and their contractor may be actively inshyvolved in many of the public meetings held concerning the site They will be available to answer questions the

Another aspect of an RI is the determination of the extent of contamination Sampling is conducted to see if hazardous substances are present both on and off the site in the air water and soils The RI also investigatestoxicity volume and form of hazardous substances that are found at and surshyrounding the site

Ultimately EPA selects a cleanup remedy for the site after an FS is conducted and the site community has been given an opportunity to comment on the proposed remedy In an FS numerous technologies are reviewed and evaluated for their effectiveness at the specific site including its setting the nature and volume of wastes and the extent of contamishynant migration However many technologies may not be feasible because the site location makes construction imshypractical or because a technology is too expensive compared to another method with the same effectiveness for protectshying the public health welfare and the environment Thereshyfore the effectiveness of each remedy is Weighed against other considerations to determine its feasibility

Page 2

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 22: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER A legal and enforceable agreement signed between two or more parties such as EPA and potentially responsible parties whereby one party or group of parties agrees to perform or pay the cost of a site cleanup The agreement describes actions to be taken at a site and may be subject to a public comment period Unlike a consent decree an administrative order does not have to be approved by a judge

bullCHLOROFORM Once the chosen anesthetic of many hospitals this colorless volatile liquid is now used as a solvent in lacquers and plastics It is also used in the manufacture of refrigerants in propellants and plastics in anesthetics and pharmaceuticals in fire extinguishers and as a fumigant solvent sweetner and insecticide Chloroform sometimes appears in public water supplies as a byproduct of chlorination

bullDICHLOROETH ANES A colorless liquid that is a comshymon constituent of paint varnish and finish removers Its characteristic odor is sweet and similar to chloroform

GROUND WATER Water in a saturated zone beneath the surface of the earth Ground water occurs in aquifers in Sufficient quantities that it can be used as a drinking water supply for irrigation and other purposes

INORGANIC COMPOUNDS Chemical compounds that do not contain carbon Some familiar inorganic compounds include sodium chloride (NaCl) commonly known as table salt and ammonia (NHj) a common household cleaning fluid

bullMETHYLENE CHLORIDE A colorless liquid with a characteristically sweet odor Common uses include paint stripping and solvent degreasing it is also used in aerosols

photographic film synthetic fibers and textile and leather coatings

bullPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) A famshyily of organic (carbon-containing) compounds that take a long time to break down into their simpler less harmful chemical components they are therefore persistent in the environment PCBs have been used since 1929 in electrical devices such as insulators and coolants lubricants carbonshyless copy paper adhesives and caulking compounds This family of compounds is versatile due in part to their fire resistent properties

SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-containing chemical compounds that at a relatively low temperature fluctuate between a vapor state (a gas) and a liquid state

SURFACE WATER Bodies of water on the surface of the earth such asrivers lakes and streams

bullTOLUENE A colorless flammable liquid found as a constituent of gasoline and paints adhesive solvents in plasshytic toys and model airplanes dyes and perfumes

bullTRICHLOROETHANE A colorless liquid commonly used as a solvent for chlorinated rubber in chemical laborashytories and is found in various organic materials such as fats oils and resins

bullTRICHLOROETHYLENE A colorless liquid that is commonly used in dry cleaning operations as a refrigerant (it is a heat exchange liquid) in degreasers for grease and wax on cotton and wool as a constituent in chemical dyes and for extracting caffeine from coffee

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Carbon-conshytaining chemical compounds that vaporize (go into a gaseous state) at a relatively low temperature

bullAdditional information on each of these chemicals can be obtained from John Blanchard Hope First Selectman

public may have regarding their present involvement with the site

STATUS OF THE SETTLING PARTIES WORK PLAN

Canonie Environmental the firm hired by the settling parties to conduct the RIFS for the site submitted a draft work plan to EPA and DEP on December 16 1987 EPA and DEP have conducted an extensive review of this document EPA and DEP are currently submitting detailed comments to the trustees and plan to meet to discuss the comments and the overall RIFS on February 5 1988

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST STATUS

The Union Chemical Co site was originally proposed for inclusion on EPAs National Priorities List (NPL) in April 1985 because it met the technical criteria for attaining the NPL At the same time EPA proposed a policy of deferring from the final NPL those sites that could be cleaned up under other enforcement authorishyties such as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) this policy was finalized in June 1986 Essentially this final NPLRCRA policy states that a facility falling under this category must be bankrupt or must have lost RCRA authorization to operate and have a history of unwillingness to address contamination at

Page 3

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 23: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

EPAs NPLRCRA policy it is necessary for the Community Relations Plan Agency to repropose the Union Chemical site for the

A community relations plan is being prepared for the Union Chemical site This plan will identify the commushynity affected by the sitc4ighiight the primary questions and concerns of the community and present methods devised specifically to see that those concerns are adshydressed during the cleanup process In November EPA

bull and contractor personnel conducted interviews withtown officials and other interested Hope residents EPA and DEP received a draft plan in December 1987 The final community relations plan is expected to be completed in February 1988 and will be available for public review at the Union Chemical site information repository

the site in order to be placed on the final NPL

Because the Union Chemical Co had received interim status under RCRA in 1980 (but lost this status in June 1984) and the Union Chemical site was originally proposed for the NPL before the final adoption of

FOR F U R T H E R INFORMATION CONTACT

Michael Jasinski Remedial Project Manager US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 573-5786

Patty DAndrea

INFORMATION R E P O S I T O R Y

Copies of the site Community Relations Plan the eventual approved RIFS work plan information on the Superfund program and other relevant site documents will soon be available at the Union Chemical site information repository

NPL Currently the reproposal of the Union Chemical site is scheduled to occur in early March 1988 and will be open to public comment Following this review period EPA will again assess the Union Chemical sites status for final inclusion on the NPL giving considerashytion to any comments received

The Union Chemical site is one of many such NPL RCRA-related sites within the United States affected by this new (June 1986) policy

F U T U R E A C T I V I T I E S

EPA and the State are currently planning to hold a joint public meeting on February 23 at 700 pm in the Hope Elementary School auditorium Representatives of EPA and DEP will discuss the RIFS and several other activities planned for the future at the Union Chemical site

Cynthia Kuhns Community Relations Coordinator Project Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building Boston MA 02203 (617) 565-3425

Bureau of Oil and Hazardous Materials Control Maine DEP State House Station 17 Augusta ME 04333 (207)289-2651

Hope Town Office Hope ME 04847 (207) 763-4199 Copies cost $10page

Hours Monday 8am-12pm Wednesday 7-9pm Thursday 2-6pm

Other times by appointment

MAILING L I S T ADDITIONS

To be placed on the mailing list to receive information on the Union Chemical Company site please complete this form and mail to

Patty DAndrea Community Relations Coordinator US EPA Region I JFK Federal Building

Boston MA 02203

Name Address Affiliation Phone

L J

Page 4

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 24: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

CONCEPTUAL RENDERING

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 25: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

APPENDIX C

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 26: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

UNION CHEMICAL COMPANY SITE

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING

February 23 1988 700 pm

AGENDA

Topic Speaker

Introduction Laurie Ziegenfus BoozlaquoAllen amp Hamilton Inc

Residential Well Sampling MichaelJasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

State Monitoring Program Cynthia Kuhns Maine Department of Environmental Protection

Overview of Superfund Health Marilyn Disirio Agency for Assessments Toxic Substances and Disease

Registry

Future Activities Michael Jasinski U S Environmental Protection Agency

Questions and Answers

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 27: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

APPENDIX D

^

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 28: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

^ ^ ^ ^

SUMMARY RESULTS FOR RESIDENTIAL WKrTs W T y H DETECTED v o 4 T T I B

^ M I C ^ O l l P O W D S VOLATILE

Sample No

86905

86905

86913

86914

86915

86917

86928

Sample No

88504

88507

88523

88525

88526

88867

Name

G u i s e l e y

( l a b o r a t o r y d u p l i c a t e )

Chase

Johnson

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

C r a b t r e e

Jensen

Parameter D e tected

1 i 1 - D i c h i o r o e t h a n e 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

T r i c h i o r o e t h y l e n e

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

M ethylene C h l o r i d e shy1 raquo2-Dichloroethane

1 2 - Dichloroethane

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

lt055 12

13

lt069

18

19

lt058 18

lt0 53

VOCs TN h i t L r E D V 0 COCTOBERNOVEMBER 1ltJlaquo~

Name

J ohnson

G u i s e i y

Fogg

Chase

( f i e l d d u p l i c a t e )

B u r r

Parameter D etected

T r i c h l o r o e t h y l e n e

1 1 - Dichioroethane 1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

C h l o r o f o r m

11 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

1 1 1 - T r i c h l o r o e t h a n e

Toluene

laquo trade

ug1 C o n c e n t r a t i o n

10

lt0 55 1 02

094

08 7

090

1 7

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 29: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

RESIDENTIAL WELL SAMPLING RESULTS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS

Union Chemical Site South Hope Maine

Well No

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Residence

Bennett Bissett Bowley Bowman Brown Bryant Chase Cleveland Crabtree

Creamer Cushman Guiseley

Hall D Hart Hastings A Hastings H Jensen Jones E Jones M Johnson JohnstonBarr Larner Macavey MacBride Mank MartzLudwig Merrifield H Merrifield L Merrifield R Meservey Mitchell Perkins J Perkins V Powers Pushaw Robinson Shaw Sicko Staples Stinson Tibbetts Talbott Wichenbach

Compoundtsl Present

ND1

ND ND ND ND ND

111-Trichloroethane ND

Methylene Chloride 12-Dichloroethane

ND ND

11- Dichloroethane 111-Trichloroethane

ND ND ND ND

12- Dichloroethane ND ND

Trichloroethylene ND ND ND ND

ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND

Concentration (ppbl

lt69 (Detection Limit)

lt58 (Detection Limit) 18

lt55 (Detection Limit) 13

lt53 (Detection Limit)

19

Fish Pond at Dam ND

Quiggle Brook ND Bryant House

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 30: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

B14214(H)

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 31: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

APPENDIX E

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 32: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

UNION CHEMICAL CO PARTIAL RIFS PROCESS

Initial Site Characterization

Scoping of the RIFS RIFS Scope

RIFS Work Plan

copy

KEY

reg = EPA amp DEP Review

Q = Phases of RIFS

= Deliverables

Draft RI Detailed Analysis of

Alternatives Work Plan

Initial Site Characterization Development of Report and Initial

Alternatives Screening Work Plan Base Line Risk

Assessment

copy Need for

Additional Investigations YES Additional X^3

Work Plan investigations

Site Characterization Addendum (s)

I Initial Screening of Alternatives

copy copyIPost-Screening Field Initial Screening Report Investigations Post-Screening Field Investigation Pilot Studies Work Plan

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 33: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

SCHEMATIC MAP OF UNION CHEMICAL SITE

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 34: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Adams Mary Aura Alexander Batty Craig amp Rhonda Bennett Lloyd amp Edna Bennett William amp Mrs Bentley Nancy Berry Mildred Beverage Hartley amp Florence Blanchard Betty Bowley Daniel amp Lucy Bowman Steven amp Andrea Brown Winona Bryant William amp Winona Burr George Camp Alford Lake Campbell Linda amp Marshall Paula Chase Hope I Cleveland Robert amp Ann Jr Crabtree Arlene Creamer Dennis amp Gertrude Curtis Luke Cushman Harold amp Harriet Dean Sherry A amp W i l l i s John DellaPenna James amp Cynthia Dinsmore Gean amp Jpdy Doherty Timothy amp Janet Dostie Laurence amp Angela Dostie Leo Dunton Harry Eaton David amp Pamela F a r r e l l Timothy amp Wilson Susan Finnemore Thera amp Barbara Fogg Neal amp Viola Fowles Ronald amp Susan F uller Peggy Gibbons Paul G i l l i s Ursala Graham Roger amp Sandra Graham Vi r g i n i a G r i f f i n Lonnie Jr Grotton Roy amp Linda Guiseley Kenneth amp Elizabeth H a l l David Hamalainen Howard amp Patricia Hart Elmer Lois amp Hazel Hastings Albert amp Velua bullHastings Henry amp Dorothy Hillgrove Herbert H i l t Debbie Holbrook William amp Neal Holmes Bernard amp Ramona Howell Ronald Jacobson Ken Jensen John amp Lois

RFD2 Box 424 RFD2 Box 522 RFD2 Box 627 RFD2 Box 652 RFD2 PO Box 0 RFD2 Box 320 RFD2 Box 460 RFD2 Box 523 PO Box 596 RFD2 Box 525 RFD2 Box 646 RFD2 Box 528 RFD2 Box 639 RFD2 Box 582 RFD2 Box 565 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 537 RFD2 Box 550 RFD2 Box 541 RFD2 Box 549 PO Box 224 RFD2 Box 616 RFD2 Box 657 RFD2 Box 478 RFD2 Box 641 PO Box 151 RFD2 Box 706 15 Spruce St PO Box 479 PO Box 325 RFD2 Box 572 PO Box 816 RFD2 Box 557 RFD2 Box 457 Shorehill Campground PO Box 616 RFD2 Box 552 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 573 RFD2 Box 647 RFD2 Box 667 RFD2 Box 529 RFD2 Box 363 RFD2 Box 633 RFD2 Box 626 RFD2 Box 610 RFD2 Box 613 SR32

RFD2 Box 738 RFD2 Box 505 RFD2 Box 474 101 Studman St PO Box 689 RFD2 Box 532

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04847 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862

Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Rockland ME 04841 Camden ME 04843 Rockport ME 04815 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Booth Bay ME 04537 Camden ME 04843 Union ME 04862

Union ME bull 0 4 8 6 2 Union ME ltbull 04862 Union- ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Hope ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Owlshead ME 04854 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Union ME 04862 Jonesford MA 01824 Rockland ME 04841 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number is unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 35: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Johnson Gustav amp Hazel Johnston Martha Jones Arthur Jones Edwin amp Rebecca Jones J u l i e Jones Milton Lappe Dr Marc Larner Carolie MAJ Larner Katharine Leach Steven amp Amy Lie-Neilsen Peter amp Laura Lowberg Robert amp Flora Lowell Richard amp Janice Ludwick Walter amp Darlene Macbride John amp Mary Mank Arlene Martz Auto Sales Martz Charles amp Esther Martz Charles amp Rebecca Jr Martz Dale

Martz Donald amp Maxine Martz Terry M e r r i f i e l d Harry amp Marion M e r r i f i e l d Laurence amp Tina M e r r i f i e l d Lewis amp Florance M e r r i f i e l d Richard amp Rhoda Jr M e r r i l l Mervin M i t c h e l l E l l i o t amp Mary Jane Monroe Fred amp Mary Jean M o r r i l l Frank amp Kathy Morrissey Susan Mosher Malcolm amp Martha Murray Vincent amp Rebecca Nickerson Patricia Ott Francis amp Lorraine Payson Paul amp Sherry Peckham Donald Pendleton Deborah amp Ha l l Denis Pennington Douglas amp Rebecca Jr Perkins Jeffrey amp Sarah Perkins V i r g i l amp Shirley Powers Brian amp Ann Marie Pushaw Donald amp Laura Rechenberg Fred amp Doris Redding William amp Leona Ribeck Fred Ripley Douglas Jr amp Hilda Roberts Bernard amp Catherine Robinson Marquis amp Elizabeth Robinson Victor amp Vendette Deborah Shaw Robert amp Elizabeth Stanley Jerry Smith Randy Snow Robert

RFD2 Box 594 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 1246 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 bull Union ME 04862 PO Box 808 Union ME 04862 PO Box 131 Hope ME 04847 RFD2 Box 654 Union ME 04862 1713 Livingston St Evanston IL 60201 PO Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 552 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 522A Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 310 Union ME 04862 PO Box 234 Rockport ME 04851 RFD2 Box 636 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 547 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 527 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 509 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 543 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 520 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 519 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 518 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 617 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 545 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 612 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 540 Union ME 04862 NON RESIDENT RFD2 Box 555 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 635 Union ME 04862 PO Box 473 Camden ME 04843 PO Box 276 Rockland ME 04841 RFD2 Box 487 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 511 Union ME 04862 RD2 Box 648 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 503 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 569 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 86 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 643 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 476 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 628 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 501 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 624 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 535 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 482 Union ME 04862 RFD42 Box 661A Union ME 04862 PO Box 123 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box650 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 454 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 645 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 472 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 534 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 44 Franklin Street Nashua NH 03061 150 Main Street 1 Thomaston ME 04861

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 36: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

UNION CHEMICAL MAILING LIST

Stanley Janice bullStaples Roberta M amp Arthur H S t a r r e t t J Steele Bruce amp Mclntyre LuAnn Stinson Walter amp Loretta Sukeforth Howard Talbot Gordon amp Katherine Teague Ph i l i p amp Donna Tibbetts Donald amp Frances Townsend Ruth Volenik Paul amp Gretchen Watts Steven amp Janice Wellman Evelyn Wellman LaForrest amp Darlene Wentworth L i l l i a n Whittet Roland W i l l i s Frank amp Arlene W i l l i s John Winchenbach Dana amp Ruth

RFD 2 Box 653 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 528A Union ME 04862 RR 2 PO Box 714 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 561 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 548 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 622 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 484 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 480 Union ME 04862 PO Box 194 L i n c o l n v i l l e ME 04862 PO Box 591 Camden ME 04843 RFD2 Box 660 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 656 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 655 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 507 Union ME 04862 RFD2 PO Box 0 W Rockport ME 04865 RFD2 Box 515 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 657 Union ME 04862 RFD2 Box 531 Union ME 04862

IntervieweesPhone Contacts Box 0 means the box number i s unavailable however the Post Office w i l l

i d e n t i f y appropriate partys box number

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659

Page 37: DRAFT PUBLIC MEETING SUMMARY · Ms. Kuhns explained that th DEe P monitoring program targets on-site well and severas l well eass t of Quiggl Brooke . Sh indicatee d that on-site

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

March 11 1988

Rose Harvell Project Officer US Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street Room 2834 Washington DC 20460

bull j

PROJECT EPA CONTRACT NO 68-01-7331

DOCUMENT NO T714-C01-EP-BSEX-1

SUBJECT Draft Public Meeting Summary for Work Assignment 714 Union Chemical Company inc Document No T714-C01-CR-BSEY-2

Dear Ms Harvell

Please find enclosed the Draft Public Meeting Summary entitled Union Chemical Company inc South Hope Maine as Partial f u l f i n ^ r reporting requirements for this 5 r t ^ i raquo pound t a 1 of the

if you have any comments regarding this submittal Dlease eontarf T shy

Sincerely

CDM Federal Programs Corporation

John Walker

TES I I I Regional Manager

PErf

Enclosure cc^Michael-Jas^j^EPArPrima^

S E E S i f t 0 Z L i s trade p s a r ^ t i r t 7 C^RCLA^Igion I Candace Cable EPA HQ Coordinator CERCLA Region I

pound3L^^^pound^ Heather Burns Boo Allen Hamilton Inc Program Manager (letter only)

TAFft - 4

205 Portland Street 3id ROOT Boston MA 02114 617 742-2659