Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

15
Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012

Transcript of Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Page 1: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Division of Social Sciences

Decentralized Order: pros & cons

Dan RyanFall 2012

Page 2: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

What do well functioning markets do?

• Achieve an efficient distribution of resources• Process distributed information

Page 3: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Efficient distribution of resources

Page 4: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Process distributed information

MARKET

110101010101100101010101010101011110101000010101010101010101010011010101010101010100000111100101011001100101010001010100101001010100100101001001001010000011111101001001101010101010101000100101101001010101110102020101010110010101010101010101111010100001010101010101010101001101010101010101010000011110010101100110010101000101010010100101

WORLD

Page 5: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Fundamental Result

1. Under ideal conditions

2. Free competition in a

3. Price system will yield

4. An efficient outcome

Page 6: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Perfect Market Requires…

• Decentralized exchange can yield coordination and cooperation when– Number of participants is not small– Information free– Rational agents– No externalities– No transaction costs– Not public goods

Page 7: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

What is a public good?

• Non-excludable and non-rivalrous – Common examples: fresh air, knowledge, lighthouses,

national defense, flood control systems, street lighting. • Problems

– excessive use can produce negative externalities• air pollution and traffic congestion

– related to "free-rider" problem or tragedy of the commons• Thus, good may be under-produced, overused, decay• Or converted via access restrictions to club or private

goods– copyright, patents, congestion tolls, cable/pay-per-view.

Page 8: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Types of Goods

Excludable Non-excludable

RivalrousPrivate goodsfood, clothing, cars, iPod

Common-pool resourcesfish stocks, timber, coal

Non-rivalrousClub goodscinemas, private parks, satellite TV, stereo system

Public goodsbroadcast TV/radio, air, national defense

Page 9: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Functioning Market Requires…

• Market may solve problem of order– Number of participants is not small– Information readily available– Agent rationality is supported/applied/exploited– Externalities are regulated– Transaction costs are minimized

Page 10: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

In the Real World…

• Success Power Manipulation• Groups/networks/identity exist• Agents are boundedly rational• Information expensive, ambiguous• Externalities abound• Transaction costs significant

Page 11: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Types of Market Failure

• Monopolies (microsoft) • Incomplete markets (education)• Harmful goods (cigarettes)• Negative externalities (leaf blowers)• Confusing property rights (online education)• Information asymmetry (used cars)• Transaction costs (book exchange)

Page 12: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

What about orgs and government?

• Lots of projects are best carried out by organizations.

• Government needed to maintain law and order, establish property rights, enforce contracts

• Others would add: and to address market failures.

Page 13: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Market Failure?

Market WorksGovt Works Govt & Market Failure

Govt Failure to Correct

Govt Action?

Govt Failure?

Page 14: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Dealing with Market Failure• Private Mechanisms

• Organization, Cooperation, Coordination Provision

• Public Mechanisms1. Do nothing

• Sometimes what CAN be done is much less effective than what MIGHT be done and the latter's just not worth doing.

2. Improve working of market• Information• Fight monopoly• Set standards• Forbid externalities

3. Government Incentives• student loans, mortgage deduction, pricing externalities, cigarette taxes (but might

not get it right).

4. Government provision of services (but free riders).

Page 15: Division of Social Sciences Decentralized Order: pros & cons Dan Ryan Fall 2012.

Efficiency ≠ Equity/Fairness

• Most markets not perfectly competitive (in specific ways)

• Efficiency not the same as social welfare, just a component of it.

• Might reach an optimal point on the possibility frontier but not the one society would prefer to all others, just those nearby.

• Market behavior might be objectionable