[American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit -...

14
(c)2001 American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics or Published with Permission of Author(s) and/or Author(s)' Sponsoring Organization. At A A A0116155 AIAA 2001-0242 Neutral Atmosphere Variability and Implications for Spacecraft Design and Operations Jerry K. Owens NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL Frank Marcos Space Weather Center of Excellence Hanscom AFB, MA W. Kent Tobiska FDC/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA William W. Vaughan University of Alabama in Huntsville Huntsville, AL 39th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit 8-11 January 2001 / Reno, NV For permission to copy or republish, contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191

Transcript of [American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit -...

(c)2001 American Institute of Aeronautics & Astronautics or Published with Permission of Author(s) and/or Author(s)' Sponsoring Organization.

At A A A0116155

AIAA 2001-0242Neutral Atmosphere Variability and Implicationsfor Spacecraft Design and OperationsJerry K. OwensNASA Marshall Space Flight CenterHuntsville, AL

Frank MarcosSpace Weather Center of ExcellenceHanscom AFB, MA

W. Kent TobiskaFDC/Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadena, CA

William W. VaughanUniversity of Alabama in HuntsvilleHuntsville, AL

39th AIAA Aerospace SciencesMeeting & Exhibit

8-11 January 2001 / Reno, NVFor permission to copy or republish, contact the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Suite 500, Reston, VA 20191

BackgroundOO

Density Calibration Technique f- Observed drag for calibration satellite used to correct model estimates for |

other spacecraft |o

- Short-term (< 2 weeks) accuracy of 5% - 7% achieved |8'

- Studies of correlations with solar and geomagnetic variations in progress %CT

Fidelity of Thermospheric Model Inputs |- Comparison of accuracies of various future estimation techniques for solar I

activity |ID

- Comparison of accuracies of various future estimation techniques for |geomagnetic activity

_

Parameterization of operation solar EUV data to replacesolar activity indices- How well can it be made to perform?- What are the associated problems?

V)•ao

(Q

O(QQ)

"

Background (continued)OO

CD

SOLAR2000 Model Objectives- Provide the world's premier empirical solar irradiance specification

o

- Link with other space physics models for a space weather nowcasting and Jforecasting capability f

- Provide daily historical, nowcast, and forecast irradiances |TI

SOLAR2000 heritage and characteristics 1O CD

- heritage from SERF2 (1989), EUV91 (1991), EUV97 (1998) solar models Iand UARS, ASTM I

c/>

- S2K is the first self-consistent empirical full solar spectrum I>

- irradiances from the X-rays to the IR at 1 nm spectral resolution; temporal |resolution from minutes to solar cycles I

o~

- ISO draft solar standard compliant |o

- S2K is modular (packaged, autonomously web-served) and is coupled with Jother models and visualization software to produce improved ionospheric |and thermospheric densities z

(Q0)

Drag Derived Atmospheric Density8CD

I'

300

250

200

XLJLJQ= 150oT-u.

100

GFZ Orbital Drag vs F10.7

1E-15

-F10.7

GFZ Drag

1E-16

O)2QNU.O

1&17

28-Oct-95 15-May-96 1-Dec-96 19-Jun-97 5-Jan-98 24-Jul-98 9-Feb-991E-18

28-Aug-99

C?

5-8

8O

Tl

CO(Oo'

TIME

Q.O"

>

5O^(/^

CO•oo

CQ

O

ATMOSPHERIC CALIBRATION CD

Local correction to density model based on tracking a "calibrationsatellite is applied globally.

Calibrationsatellite

Orbit

SSN Tracking Data

Operational

Drag Errors

Precision orbitdetermination

with newglobal density

Effective solarEUV heating for

improvedpredictions

Local

operational

density model

correction

Globaloperational

density modelcorrection

Io30)

8O

Tl

0)

Q.O~

C^5O

S

CO

O

(Q

O

Long Duration Exposure FacilityBallistic Coefficient Values

CD

1.50

350300

- 250?200150100

300

881004/9/88

882007/18/88

8830010/26/88

890342/3/89

TIME

89134 89234 893345/14/89 8/22/89 11/30/89

C?O30)

CO-

CO30)

Tl-

TlCD

5O

(/^Q)3Q.O"

CO-oo

CO

OcB0)

N'0£

o'

Temperatures Derived fromLDEF Ballistic Factors

CD

200£?£ 100

| oLU

s -100LUH

-200

~ 100STu 50oc w

1 •LU

s -50

-100

TOTALCDO

O30)

LTV

881004/9/88

882007/18/88

8830010/26/88

890342/3/89

TIME

89134 89234 893345/14/89 8/22/89 11/30/89

oc/>oTl

TlCD

COo'

5oSQ)3Q.O"

CO-oo

CO

OcBQ)

0^

o'

Improvement Achievable ThroughExospheric Temperature Adjustment

8

CD

I'

ERROR REDUCTION USINGATMOSPHERIC CALIBRATION

INITIAL DATA — CALIBRATED DATA

CDO30)&8'

oTl

CO(/>o'

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800TIME (DAYS)

0)Q.O"

£5OSCOO

CQOCBQ)

201

Application of Calibration From LowInclination Satellite (LDEF)

H Initialll LDEF Cal

28.5 28.5 65.9

Inclination97.9 98.4

CD

I

o0)

>CO-

CO30)

Tl

TlCD

5O

(/^Q)3Q.O"

CO-oo

CO

OcB0)

Thermosphere ModelOO

CD

o

Development Data Sets - satellite drag and incoherent scatter radar dataModel Formulation

o'

- Static diffusive equilibrium *£

- Regression fits to determine empirical coefficients IModel Dependencies- Solar flux (daily and average)- Geomagnetic activity (3 hourly)- Local Time- Latitude and Longitude- Season

Model Outputs- Neutral Temperature- Total density- Number density of major species |

o

COI

Spacecraft Orbital Lifetime PredictionTechnique Block Diagram

SPACECRAFTORBITAL STTATE

VECTORESTIMATEDFUTURE

SOLAR FLUXBEHAVIOR

ESTTIMATEDATMOSPHERIC

DENSITY

ORBITALLIFETIME

MODELATMOSPHERE

MODELESTIMATED

GEOMAGNETIC

PREDICTEDSPACECRAFT

ATTITUDET1MELINE

PREDICTEDBALLISTIC

FACTOR ANDTIMELINE

SPACECRAFTCHARACTERISmCS

PREDICTEDSPACECRAFT

ORBITALLIFETIME

oo

CD

CD"o>CDO30)

8O

Tl

CDQ.

TlCD

5O

O

COI§

0)3N'

SOLAR2000 Formatsfor Spectra and Solar Indices

5dar constant

r

10""

1D~

1D"

it

JOfl

100

Irradianoe

H-tfl IR

(nm)

Irnadianoe

8

CD

Io0)

8O

Tl

a 100 ana aa a IOD ana 3aa -*co a 1CC« 3D a 3Q

Q)

Q.O"

|

O

COo

CQ

OcBQ)

Satellite use of the E10.7 Proxy CD

Satellite Drag:E10.7 and F10.7 daily values

are compared via theLOP orbit propagatorusing a J71 modelatmosphere.

El0.7 provides the solarcomponent ofatmospheric heating andis an improvementcompared with F10.7.Non-solar effects are notincluded in this modeledcomparison with theSME actual altitudes.

300

f- 250E

20O

150__go 100

50

I 525DDcr

g 520

a^ 515

Com pans o n of da i ly EmT d nd F10,-10,7

I

l \

E10;> ——————

^10,7— — —

^ I | *

\* I*

1OD 20O 30Q 4OODays (01 Apr 1992 - 09 Aug 1993}

Comparison of daily SME altitudes •from LOP

1OD 20O 300 4OODays (01 Apr 1992 — 09 Aug 1993)

I

o0)

>CO-

CO

0)c

8O

Tl

TJCD

5O^(/^

0)3Q.O"

CO-oo

CO

OcBQ)

Summary and Outlook >CD

CD"o

Q)

Q)

'

Tl

Satellite tracking data provides extensive neutraldensity information for the data-sparsethermosphereNeutral density model errors can now be reliablyreduced to the 5 % levelA significant component of the density model errorsis related to errors in the solar EUV proxy (F10.7)Time-dependent corrections to F10.7 yield accuratesolar EUV data for space weather applications inthe thermosphere and ionosphereE10.7 characterizes the physical solar irradiancethat deposits energy in the upper atmosphere.

Q.O"

(/^COo

O<SQ)