A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal...

97
A&E OVERSIGHT TRAINING Office of Guidance & Oversight HQ Division of Local Assistance Local Assistance

Transcript of A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal...

Page 1: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

1

AampE OVERSIGHT TRAINING

Office of Guidance amp OversightHQ Division of Local Assistance

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

2

Ray ZhangDivision Chief

Mark SamuelsonAssistant Division Chief

Kamal SahOffice Chief

Felicia HaslemProgram Manager

John YangSenior AampE Oversight Engineer

Dordaneh EslamianSenior AampE

Oversight Engineer

Trina LuoAampE Oversight

Engineer

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

CaltransLocal Assistance Organization Chart

Thersquo PhamSenior AampE

Oversight Engineer

Carol GreenAampE Oversight

Engineer

3

Our RoleWe Do Not Create Regulations

Provide Guidance amp Oversight

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

4

Process Review - Yearly Compliance

49

7782

20172014 2018

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

5

24

COST ANALYSIS

38COST amp FEE

NEGOTIATIONS

60

POLICIES amp PROCEDURES

65

SECONDARY SCORE SHEETS

Target Areas for Improvement4 Lowest Areas Measured

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

6

Important LinksLocal Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 2: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

2

Ray ZhangDivision Chief

Mark SamuelsonAssistant Division Chief

Kamal SahOffice Chief

Felicia HaslemProgram Manager

John YangSenior AampE Oversight Engineer

Dordaneh EslamianSenior AampE

Oversight Engineer

Trina LuoAampE Oversight

Engineer

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

CaltransLocal Assistance Organization Chart

Thersquo PhamSenior AampE

Oversight Engineer

Carol GreenAampE Oversight

Engineer

3

Our RoleWe Do Not Create Regulations

Provide Guidance amp Oversight

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

4

Process Review - Yearly Compliance

49

7782

20172014 2018

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

5

24

COST ANALYSIS

38COST amp FEE

NEGOTIATIONS

60

POLICIES amp PROCEDURES

65

SECONDARY SCORE SHEETS

Target Areas for Improvement4 Lowest Areas Measured

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

6

Important LinksLocal Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 3: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

3

Our RoleWe Do Not Create Regulations

Provide Guidance amp Oversight

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

4

Process Review - Yearly Compliance

49

7782

20172014 2018

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

5

24

COST ANALYSIS

38COST amp FEE

NEGOTIATIONS

60

POLICIES amp PROCEDURES

65

SECONDARY SCORE SHEETS

Target Areas for Improvement4 Lowest Areas Measured

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

6

Important LinksLocal Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 4: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

4

Process Review - Yearly Compliance

49

7782

20172014 2018

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

5

24

COST ANALYSIS

38COST amp FEE

NEGOTIATIONS

60

POLICIES amp PROCEDURES

65

SECONDARY SCORE SHEETS

Target Areas for Improvement4 Lowest Areas Measured

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

6

Important LinksLocal Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 5: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

5

24

COST ANALYSIS

38COST amp FEE

NEGOTIATIONS

60

POLICIES amp PROCEDURES

65

SECONDARY SCORE SHEETS

Target Areas for Improvement4 Lowest Areas Measured

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

6

Important LinksLocal Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 6: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

6

Important LinksLocal Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 7: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

7

Important Links

Subscribe to Local Assistance Emails dotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceother-important-issuessubscribe-to-dla-email-list

Local Assistance Blog localassistanceblogcom

Loca

l A

ssis

tanc

e

Local Assistance Consultant Selection amp Procurement dotcagovprogramslocal-assistance

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 8: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

8

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 9: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

9

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 10: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

10

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Written AampE Policies amp ProceduresPrescribed

-23 Code of Federal Regulations 1725-Provided and RequiredBy LAPM Chapter 10

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 11: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

11

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Master Agreement

Refer to your Master Agreement Such Requirements includes bull Project Administrationbull Fiscal Provisionsbull Audits

Agreement is between Local Agency and Caltrans DLA

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 12: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

12

Agencyrsquos Conflicts of

Interest(COI)

Agencyrsquos written code of standards of conduct governingbull Employeesbull Consultants under contracts

Meet the code of federal regulations (CFR)bull 2 CFR 200112bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws applies

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 13: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

13

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Contract Administrator

Control of Records and Retention

Prepares amp distributes SolicitationAdvertisements

PerformIndependent Estimate

Follow Evaluation amp Selection Procedures

Negotiation Monitor consultant progress amp approve invoices

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 14: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

14

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 15: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

15

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Procurement Planning

Set Project Objectives

Identify Need for Consultant

Select Project

Determine Schedule

Appoint Contract Administrator

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 16: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

16

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Scope of Workbull Complete Clear and Concisebull Breadth and limitations of workbull Specific Task Detailsbull Deliverables

In solicitation ndash ask for details of scope of work to be provided in consultantrsquos proposal

SOW Guidance Scope of Work Writing Guide for AampE Consultant Contractshttpsdotcagovprogramslocal-assistanceenvironmental-and-other-policy-issuesconsultant-selection-procurement

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 17: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

17

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

AampE ConsultantDefinition

Performed approved or logicallyjustifiably performed by a person licensed registered or certified as an engineer or architect

Includes licensed or certified environmental scientistprofessionals licensed surveyor and licensed landscape architects

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 18: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

18

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Program Management

DesignEngineering

Environmental

SurveyingConstruction Management

PreliminaryEngineering

Architectural Mapping

AampE ConsultantServices

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 19: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

19

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant Services that may not be considered AampE

Non-AampE procedures must followCalifornia Public Contract Code 10335-10381

Right of Way Acquisitions

Testing

Planning Studies

Public Outreach

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 20: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

20

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Cost EstimateBreakdown of the Cost Elements

bull Work or Labor Hoursbull Types or Classifications of Laborbull Direct Salary or wage rates bull Other Direct Costs

bull Materials travel etcbull Consultantrsquos fixed feebull Indirect Cost(Indirect Cost Rate)

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 21: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

21

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate Analogous

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 22: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

22

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Independent Assessment

what would YOU expect to pay for services Historical Prices

Industry standardMarket survey

Firm

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 23: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

23

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Sample Cost Estimate for Project Specific Bottom Up

Types or Classifications of Labor

Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) ProfitFee

Other Direct Cost

Work or Labor Hours

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 24: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

24

bull Cost Per Unit of Workbull Lump Sum (not the same as firm fixed fee)

bull Cost-Plus-Fixed-Feebull Specific Rate of Compensation

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Determine Method of Payment

Cost Plus a Percentage of Cost amp Percentage of Construction Cost are NOT ALLOWED

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 25: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

25

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs =

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$250hr x 250 x 120 hrs =

Fixed fee =

$62500

$ 6250

$68750

$ 6250

$75000

TOTAL = $81250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

Calculate Fixed Fee

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 26: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

26

$250hr x 250 x 80 hrs =

Fixed fee = $ 6250

$50000

TOTAL = $56250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Cost Plus Fixed Fee

Fixed Fee Stays the Same

$62500 x 10 =

TOTAL =

$ 6250

$68750When Actual Labor Hours are Less

$250hr x 250 x 100 hrs = $62500Calculate Fixed Fee

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 27: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

27

bull Provides reimbursement at the loaded hourly billing ratebull For on-call contracts

bull Specify a maximum (not-to-exceed) dollar amount

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Specific Rate of Compensation

Used only when work or cost cannot be estimated

Contracting agency is in control of the hours worked

Contracting agency must manage amp monitor

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 28: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

28

$68750hr x 100 hrs = $68750

$68750hr x 120 hrs = $82500

$250hr x 250 X 110 = $68750hr

ldquoLoaded Hourly Billing Raterdquo

$68750hr x 80 hrs = $55000

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

$250hr = Senior Engineer Firmrsquos ICR = 150 100 hrs Fixed fee = 10

Example Specific Rate of Compensation

When Labor Hours are Exceeded

When Actual Labor Hours are Less

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 29: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

29

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $81250

100 hours = $68750

120 hours = $82500

Actual Cost PlusFixed Fee

Specific Rateof Compensationvs

A Cost Savings of $1250

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Comparison of the Provided Examples

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 30: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

30

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ningbull City Engineer

bull Project Manager ndash chooses projects oversees a project or multiple projects and makes decisions on behalf of the agency

bull Dictates or persuades vs executes project or plan

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Consultant in a Management Support Role(CMSR)

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 31: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

31

Responsible Charge = full time public employeebull Contract negotiation contract payment consultant performance evaluation bull Being familiar with the contract requirements scope of services and products to be

produced bull Being familiar with the qualifications of the consultants staff amp changes in key

personnel bull Attending progress amp project review meetings to ensure project delivery according

to schedule milestones bull Ensuring consultant costs billed are allowable and consistent with the contract terms bull Evaluating and participating in decisions for contract modificationsbull Documenting contract monitoring activities and maintaining supporting contract

records as specified in 2 CFR 200333

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Local Agency Responsibilities

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 32: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

32

Example 1-Consultant performing project design shall not perform construction management on the same project

Example 2-Consultant performing construction material quality control testing for construction contract shall not perform Construction Material Quality Assurance on the same project

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR ndash Conflict of InterestBest Practice

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 33: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

33

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

CMSR Approval Process

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 34: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

34

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Agency submits SOW amp COI Policy to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Review

ApprovedNO

Agency Needs a CMSR

Step 1 Prior to Solicitation

Agency Advertises RFQ Selects Consultant amp Receives Exhibit 10-U from Consultant

YES

Agency Receives approved Exhibit

10-U FHWA

Agency submits Exhibit 10-U to

aeoversightdotcagov

FHWA Receives Exhibit 10-U

ApprovedNO

Step 2 After Solicitation amp Selection

YES

CMSR Approval Process

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 35: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

35

bull Incomplete independent cost estimate bull Inadequate record keeping and document retention

bull Retain for a period of 3 yearsbull Policies amp Procedures adoption

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 36: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

36

bullVisit Caltrans AampErsquos website dotcagovhqLocalProgramsAEbullLAPM Chapter 10 prescribes the written Procurement Policies amp ProceduresbullAn example Policies amp Procedures Adoption Resolution bullA signed Master Agreement is required which identifies the terms and conditions between the Local Agency and Caltrans

bullComplete amp Sign Exhibit 10-T Conflict of Interest and Confidentiality Statement for all committee members

bullExhibit 10-U required when a CMSR is applicable

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Forms amp Resources Procurement Planning

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 37: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

37

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 38: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

38

Competitive Negotiation

bull Qualifications-Based Selection methodbull Demonstrated Competencybull Professional Qualifications

bull Price shall NOT be used as a factor in analysis and selection

bull Not competitive biddingbull Clear and concise requirements Fu

ll amp

Ope

n C

ompe

titio

n

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 39: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

39

bull In-state and out-of-state firms given opportunities

bull Public announcementbull Agency website trade journals online

forumsbull Advertisement Period of 14 days

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Advertisement

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 40: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

40

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Two Step RFQRFP method

Used for

bull Establishing a ldquopre-qualified listrdquo of consultants bull Multiple on-call contracts for similar services

through single solicitation

bull Project Specific - More complex projects

02

RFP

01

RFQ

SOLICITATION

DOCUMENT

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 41: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

41

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Pre-qualified List of ConsultantsRFQ must include

bull Scope of services is defined broadly under general work categories or areas of expertise

bull Minimum qualifications (passfail) are established for Pre-qualification of consultants ndash qualification based selection and financial management system requirements

bull Annual statements of qualification are encouraged but no more than two years valid on the list

bull Performance evaluation data to update listRFP must include

bull Specific project or task requirements schedule amp deliverablesbull Consultants specific technical approach and qualifications (full QBS process)bull Subject to all other requirements in a One-Step RFP process such as method of

payment evaluation criteria audit and cost proposal submittals and DBE goal Etc

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 42: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

42

RFQ must includebull Single solicitation for multiple on-call contractsbull Scope of services is defined broadly to cover general categories

of projects or servicesbull Minimum qualifications of consultants and professional personnelbull Number of contractson-call consultants to be selectedbull A not-to-exceed dollar amount for each contractbull Each contract duration not-to-exceed 5 yearsbull Audit review and financial management system provisionsbull DBE Goal for each contract (Exhibit 10-I)bull Negotiating Price Agreements with selected consultants based on

specific rate of compensation method of paymentbull Provisions for the streamlined (or mini) RFP process to procure

project task or service specific contracts ndash full QBS

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 43: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

43

Mini RFP (additional QBS) may include

bull Project specific scope of work deliverables schedules duration

bull Circulate mini-RFP (with evaluation criteria Project or Task specific DBE goal) to all on-call consultants

bull Full competitive QBS process ndash cost is not a factor

bull Evaluate proposals and select most qualified consultant

bull Negotiate actual cost plus fixed fee for task order based on the on-call contract (labor) price agreement

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Multiple On-call Consultants for Similar Services

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 44: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

44

bull Minimum three membersbull Subject matter experts and Contract Administratorbull Review and evaluate proposals conduct interviewsbull Membership should be confidential

NOTE Participation by a Caltrans representative does not relieve the local agency of its responsibility to ensure that proper procurement procedures are followed and all requirements are met

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Consultant Selection Committee

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 45: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

45

Conflicts of Interest bull 2 CFR 200112

bull 23 CFR 1727(b)(4)bull 23 CFR 133

State and Local Laws also appliesConsult your city or countyrsquos attorneyCollect amp retain signed and dated statements Example is LAPM Exhibit 10-T

Proc

urem

ent

Plan

ning

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Selection Panel Must meet the federal regulations

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 46: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

46

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-B

bull Qualifications Criteriabull Weightsbull Signaturebull Secondary score sheets

Based on the criteria established amp published within the public solicitation document

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 47: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

47

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ionWhat is DBE

Contract GOAL

Disadvantage Business Enterprise

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 48: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

48

Contract estimated gt$500000Complete and Submit Exhibit 9-D to Caltrans DLAEApproval will be from OGO

Contract estimated lt$500000Exhibit 9-D is submitted to Caltrans DLAE for review

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Determining DBE Goal

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 49: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

49

1 Identify work

2 Determine work category codes for subcontracting

3 Search for available DBE firms by districts (CUCP) gt7

4 Apply DBE factors to sub work

5 Calculate a soft goal

6 Apply 80 factor

7 Round to nearest whole

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

DBE Goal in 7 Simple Steps

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 50: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

50

Local Agency determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 7bull CAD Services = 4

Consultant determined work itemsbull Environmental Support = 6bull CM Services = 5

Task Order 2 $150Kbull Final Roadway Design ($135K)bull CM Services ($15K)

Task Order 1 $100Kbull Preliminary Roadway DesignNEPA documentbull Environmental Support ($2K)bull Roadway Design ($98K)Estimated DBE by Agency = ($2119870119870)

$100119870119870= 2 Estimated DBE by Agency = ($15119870119870)

$150119870119870= 10

Close out contract using Final Utilization Exhibit 17-F ($120784120784120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120784120784)

($120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784+$120783120783120783120783120783120783120784120784)= 68

Track DBE usage for task orders and close out task order projects using Exhibit 10-G

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example Determining a DBE GoalOn-call Contract DBE Goal 11Exhibit 10-O1 and Exhibit 10-O2

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 51: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

51

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

LAPM Exhibit 10-G

New Form

Individual AampE Task Order DBE Tracking Sheet

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 52: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

52

Project Specific 1Federal Project Number (FPN) BRLO-4111(015)

PE XYZ ConsultantSurveying on-callCON contractorProject Specific 2 FPN ATPL-4111(016)

PE In-houseSurveying On-call AampE ContractCON contractor

Task Order 2 ndash FPN ATPL-4111(016)

When Closing OutExhibit 17-F ContractorExhibit 17-F On-call Surveying(supported by 10-Grsquos for Task Orders)

Task Order 1 ndash FPN BRLO-4111(015)

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Example DBE Goal amp Utilization Master On-call

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 53: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

53

bull Lack of evaluation criteria with level of importance (weights) in RFPRFQ

bull No Conflict of Interest Statements by selection panelbull No method of payment specified in RFPRFQbull No cost proposal requirement specified in RFPRFQbull Inadequateundocumented advertisement method for

the RFPRFQbull Inadequate documentation of a responsiveness review

prior to acceptance of the RFPRFQ

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 54: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

54

bull Procurement schedule missingbull Oral interviews not identifiedbull Contract type missingbull Method of payment incorrect or missingbull Length of contract not included (on-call)bull DBE goals for on-call contracts missingbull Exhibit 10-R missingbull CMSR not approved prior to solicitation

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies(Continued)

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 55: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

55

bullSolicitation Document examples are at our Caltrans AampErsquos website bullExhibit 10-B Suggested Consultant Evaluation Sheet is a sample scoring sheetbullExhibit 10-H Cost Proposal submitted in a separate concealed formatbullExhibit 9-D DBE Contract Goal Methodology can assist in establishing a DBE contract goal bullExhibit 10-I Notice to Proposers DBE Information can be used to specify a DBE contract goal in the solicitation

bullIncorporate Exhibit 10-R AampE Boiler Plate Agreement LanguagebullExhibit 10-U is required when scope of work includes a CMSR

bullCMSR Requires FHWA approval See approval CMSR process

Forms amp Resources Full amp Open Competition

Full

amp O

pen

Com

petit

ion

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 56: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

56

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 57: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

57

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 58: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

58

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Caltrans Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Chapter 10

Federalbull Title 23 Code of Federal Regulation Part 172 (23 CFR 172)

ldquoProcurement Management and Administration of Engineering and Design Related Servicesrdquo

Statebull Government Code 4525-4529 ldquoContracting with AampE Firmsrdquo

Qualifications Based Selection

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 59: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

59

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Engineer and design services are quality based similar to a doctor or helliphellip

CA regulations require all AampE Consultants to be selected based on qualifications not cost

Why Not Consider Price

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 60: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

60

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Evaluations of Proposalsbull Evaluation criteria must be the same as in the solicitationbull Interviews

bull Retain all score sheets

Qualifications Based Selection

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 61: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

61

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sole source is allowed under the following circumstances

1 Only one consultant is qualified to perform work2 An Emergency situation3 Competition is determined to be inadequate after

solicitation of a number of sources

Sole Source

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 62: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

62

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Received only 1 proposalbull Prepare Public Interest Finding (PIF) ndash Exhibit 12-F

bull Approved by District Local Assistance Engineer (DLAE) for federal funding

bull Evaluatebull Negotiate to ensure fair and reasonable price for

services

Sole Source ndash After Advertisement

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 63: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

63

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Responsiveness Review

Reject proposals that fail to meet submittal requirements and minimum qualifications

Establish submittal requirements minimum qualifications evaluation criteria

Non-responsive submittals must be rejected and documented in contract files

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 64: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

64

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

SAMPLE AampE CONSULTANTrsquoS SOPSOQ RESPONSIVENESS CHECKLIST

The following checklist is provided as a tool to assist Consultants responding to a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) or Request For Proposal (RFP) Solicitations may differ in their requirements therefore please read each solicitation carefully to ensure responsiveness Also refer to ldquoSubmittal Instructionsrdquo and ldquoGeneral Contract Process Informationrdquo NOTE Checklist must be modified to fit local agencyrsquos general contract process and procedures

SOQSOP REQUIREMENTS

Submittal Date and Time Required number of copies submitted

SOQSOP includes the following ___ sections

Section 1 ndash Transmittal Letters from Prime and Sub Consultants Section 2 ndash DBE Goal Documentation Section 3 ndash Workplan Schedules and Deliverables Section 4 ndash Staffing Plan Organizational Chart and Resumes Section 5 ndash Project References and Contacts Section 6 ndash Nondiscrimination Statement (if applicable)

Responsiveness Checklist

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 65: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

65

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Exhibit 10-O1

Consultant must meet the DBE Goal or demonstrate a good faith effort

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 66: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

66

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Convene the Selection Committeebull Review proposalsbull Complete score sheetsbull Sign and date all original score sheetsbull Contract Administrator compiles scores and rankingbull If conducting interviews develop short list of top 3 to 5 firmsbull If no interviews finalize ranking of top three firms and request

cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Must inform top 3 firms on short list or final ranking

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 67: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

67

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Committee performs reference checks (best practice)bull Develop standard questions to askbull Have one person perform reference checksbull Compile and document other information gathered independentlybull Retain records in contract filesbull Must be done prior to oral interviews if any

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 68: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

68

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Prepare for Interviews of Short Listbull Prepare interview agenda questions and score sheetsbull Send invitation to (short list) firms with

bull Format of interview scoring criteria and time tablesbull Copy of Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bull Request for cost proposals in sealed envelopes to be

collected at time of interview

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 69: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

69

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Conduct interviews of short listbull Conduct interviewsbull Collect cost proposals in sealed envelopesbull Record interview evaluations on score sheetsbull Develop final ranking (top three firms) and

inform short list of results per regulation

Evaluation amp Selection of Consultants

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 70: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

70

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

Sample Score Compilation and Ranking Exercise

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 71: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

71

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bull Lack of retention of original score sheets from the evaluation process

bull Inadequate documentation during the secondary evaluation processinterview portion

bull Actual evaluation criteria differ from original described in the RFPRFQ without appropriate documentation

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 72: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

72

Qua

lific

atio

ns

Base

d Se

lect

ion

bullVerify amp Document that proposals meet Responsiveness Items bullDistribute proposals to Consultant Selection CommitteebullEvaluate Based on Published Criteria in the solicitationbullConduct Interviews When Specified in the solicitationbullRank amp Notify Top 3 Consultants amp Select Most Qualified ConsultantbullRetain All Evaluation Sheets including secondary evaluations

Forms amp Resources Qualifications Based Selection

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 73: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

73

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 74: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

74

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 75: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

75

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Mostly labor

bull Named Key StaffClassificationsbull Professional and sub-professional licensedunlicensed

bull Multi-discipline OfficeField bull Level of Effort (Hours per Task) for Project Specific Contractbull Based on the method of payment

bull Actual cost plus fixed feebull Specific rate of compensation (On-call contracts)

Cost Proposal

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 76: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

76

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Includes the followingbull Labor Costs

bull Actual WageSalarybull Indirect Cost Rate (ICR)bull Other Direct Costs (ODC)

bull eg TravelPer Diem Rental Equipment or consumable suppliesbull Both Prime and Sub-consultantsbull Profit or Fee

Cost Proposal

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 77: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

77

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Exhibit 10-H Example Cost ProposalCost Plus Fixed Fee

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 78: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

78

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Review cost proposal from top ranked firmbull Must be in appropriate format (refer to LAPM Exhibit 10-H)bull Include detailedbroken down labor costs and Other Direct Costsbull Both Prime and Sub-consultants

bull Initiate contract audit and review process (LAPM chapter 10 Section 1013) and submit to Caltrans AampI at conformancereviewdotcagov

bull Begin contract negotiations with top ranked firmbull Compare with the Independent Cost Estimate (ICE)bull Document and retain all cost negotiations records

Contract Cost Negotiations

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 79: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

79

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

All costs must meet the Federal Cost Principles48 CFR 31

Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Determining Cost Allowability

Federal Cost Principles

Allocable

Reasonable

Allowable

Consistency Documentation

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 80: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

80

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Cost AnalysisBreakdown of costs and verify ifa The elements add up to the total priceb You understand the need for each element of cost items are ordinary and necessaryc The same thing does not appear in more than one statement of costd General format is the same for similar items or services

Ways to document cost analysis1 Actual cost previously incurred2 Most recent cost estimate for the same or similar items or services3 Independent forecast of future costs

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 81: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

81

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Items that You have to Negotiate

Negotiable Items

Labor Escalation

ProfitFee

Cost Items ODCs

Classifications amp the Quality level of staff

Hours per task

WorkplanDeliverablesamp Schedules

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 82: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

82

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Firmrsquos indirect cost rate - ICR (or overhead) is subject to Audits review (FAR)bull Self certified by Consultant in Exhibit 10-Kbull Consultant ICR established by Cognizant Letterbull Voluntary reduction of consultant indirect cost rate

bull Firmrsquos direct labor is subject to verificationbull Payroll recordsbull Benchmarking of consultant direct salary rates

Items Not Negotiated

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 83: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

83

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

If unsuccessful in negotiating contract cost with top ranked firm

bull Formally terminate negotiations with top ranked firm

bull Initiate cost negotiation with second ranked firm and repeat steps as before

bull Repeat steps with third ranked firm if necessary

Terminate Cost Negotiations

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 84: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

84

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

ProfitFee ()bull Scopesizebull Complexitybull Degree of riskbull Durationbull Number of sub-consultants

ProfitFee Negotiations

No Mark-Up (additional profit) on sub-consultantrsquos work

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 85: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

85

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Maximum profitfee is 15

Factors WeightsContract Amount 15Nature of Services 30Period of Performance (duration) 15Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20Degree of Risk 20

Estimating Profit ()

Example ProfitFee Negotiations

Sheet1

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Estimating Profit ()
Factors Weights
Contract Amount 15
Nature of Services 30
Period of Performance (duration) 15
Utilization () of Sub-consultants 20
Degree of Risk 20
Page 86: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

86

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Contract dollar Amount ndash Larger contracts yields lower profit percentage

Less than $20 M 100

$20 M - $65 M 0625 ndash 100

Above $60 M 0625

Nature of Services ndash Deliverable-based work yield higher profit percentage compared with labor-based work

Deliverable based ndash Labor based 100 ndash 0625

Period of Performance ndash Longer duration contracts result in greater risks therefore higher profit percentage

Less than 1 Year 0625

1 ndash 3 Years 0625 ndash 100

More than 3 Years 100

ProfitFee Negotiations (Continued)

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 87: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

87

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Number of Sub-consultantsSpecialty work performed by Subconsultants increases risk to Prime

Less than 15 0625

15 - 50 0625 ndash 100

More than 50 100

Degree of RiskRelated to level of complexity and sensitivity of the work

Low to High risk 0625 - 100

ProfitFee Negotiations(Continued)

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 88: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

88

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

Estimating Profit ()

Factors Weights Rate RateXWeights

Contract Amount 15 1000 1500

Nature of Services 30 1000 3000

Period of Performance (duration) 15 0850 1275

Utilization of () Sub-consultants 20 0850 1700

Degree of Risk 20 1000 2000

Total 9475

9475

Example ProfitFee NegotiationsGiven For an AampE Contract to Provide Preliminary Engineering Environmental Process and Final Engineering amp Design for a Bridge Replacement Project bull Contract amount $2 Millionbull Contract duration 15 Years bull Using Sub-consultant for 35

of the work

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 89: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

89

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bull Exhibit 10-A (Contracts of $150000 and Greater) amp Exhibit 10-K

Must be submitted to IOAI for Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) acceptance prior to contract execution

bull ICR Acceptance ID

bull For IOAI information and resources visit igdotcagovresources

Independent Office of Audits amp Investigations (IOAI)

Visit Chapter 1013

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 90: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

90

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullNo Cost analysis performedbullNo documented Cost amp Fee NegotiationsbullMissing fiscal provisions in Standard Agreement (boilerplate)bullMissing breakdown of ODCsbullMissing cost proposals for the subconsultantsbullIncomplete or inadequate cost proposal format usedbullUnallowable method of payment used (rate sheets)bullIncomplete Internal Control Questionnaire (ICQ)bullMissing andor incomplete certification forms (10-Ks)bullInconsistent Indirect Cost Rate (ICR) in 10-Ks and the cost proposal

Most Frequent Errors amp Deficiencies Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 91: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

91

Cos

t is

Fair

amp

Reas

onab

le

bullBottom-up Method ICE ExamplebullCost Analysis SamplebullInitiate IOAI Financial Review Including Indirect Cost Rate

bullSubmit Exhibit 10-A Exhibit 10-K and Exhibit 10-H Cost Proposal bullSee Exhibit 10-A for other applicable documentsbullIncludes Consultantrsquos Indirect Cost Rate Schedule

Forms amp Resources Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 92: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

92

Qualifications Based SelectionProcurement

Planning

Full amp Open Competition

Cost is Fair amp Reasonable

Contract Execution

AampE PROCUREMENT TIMELINE

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 93: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

93

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 94: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

94

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

Modifies terms of original contract eg the duration Cost

Change of Scope or Added work must be within original scope of work of the contract

For on-call contracts the amendment is restricted to the work (task order) that has already been started and cannot include any new work

Must amend contract prior to original contract expiration date

Contract Amendments

YESTERDAY

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 95: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

95

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull AampE Contract Reviewer Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Contract DBE Information (Exhibits 10-O1 and 10-O2)

bull Executed contract to District

bull Exhibit 10-A and associated documents

bull Exhibit 10-U when applicable

Contract ExecutionSubmittals to Caltrans

NOTE Only work performed after Obligation Authority (E-76) approval is eligible for federalstate reimbursement

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 96: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

96

Con

trac

t ex

ecut

ion

bull Lack of Consultant Contract Reviewers Checklist (Exhibit 10-C)

bull Incomplete fiscal and miscellaneous provisions in final contract

bull Lack of documented contract approval process

Most Frequent Errors and Deficiencies Contract Execution

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97
Page 97: A&E OVERSIGHT TRAININGcalifornialtap.org/pdf/2019_Training_Final_Main_webinar_8_23_19.pdf · Kamal Sah. Office Chief. Felicia Haslem. Program Manager. John Yang. Senior A&E Oversight

97

End Of Presentation

Questions

  • Slide Number 1
  • Slide Number 2
  • Slide Number 3
  • Slide Number 4
  • Slide Number 5
  • Slide Number 6
  • Slide Number 7
  • Slide Number 8
  • Slide Number 9
  • Slide Number 10
  • Slide Number 11
  • Slide Number 12
  • Slide Number 13
  • Slide Number 14
  • Slide Number 15
  • Slide Number 16
  • Slide Number 17
  • Slide Number 18
  • Slide Number 19
  • Slide Number 20
  • Slide Number 21
  • Slide Number 22
  • Slide Number 23
  • Slide Number 24
  • Slide Number 25
  • Slide Number 26
  • Slide Number 27
  • Slide Number 28
  • Slide Number 29
  • Slide Number 30
  • Slide Number 31
  • Slide Number 32
  • Slide Number 33
  • Slide Number 34
  • Slide Number 35
  • Slide Number 36
  • Slide Number 37
  • Slide Number 38
  • Slide Number 39
  • Slide Number 40
  • Slide Number 41
  • Slide Number 42
  • Slide Number 43
  • Slide Number 44
  • Slide Number 45
  • Slide Number 46
  • Slide Number 47
  • Slide Number 48
  • Slide Number 49
  • Slide Number 50
  • Slide Number 51
  • Slide Number 52
  • Slide Number 53
  • Slide Number 54
  • Slide Number 55
  • Slide Number 56
  • Slide Number 57
  • Slide Number 58
  • Slide Number 59
  • Slide Number 60
  • Slide Number 61
  • Slide Number 62
  • Slide Number 63
  • Slide Number 64
  • Slide Number 65
  • Slide Number 66
  • Slide Number 67
  • Slide Number 68
  • Slide Number 69
  • Slide Number 70
  • Slide Number 71
  • Slide Number 72
  • Slide Number 73
  • Slide Number 74
  • Slide Number 75
  • Slide Number 76
  • Slide Number 77
  • Slide Number 78
  • Slide Number 79
  • Slide Number 80
  • Slide Number 81
  • Slide Number 82
  • Slide Number 83
  • Slide Number 84
  • Slide Number 85
  • Slide Number 86
  • Slide Number 87
  • Slide Number 88
  • Slide Number 89
  • Slide Number 90
  • Slide Number 91
  • Slide Number 92
  • Slide Number 93
  • Slide Number 94
  • Slide Number 95
  • Slide Number 96
  • Slide Number 97