8 Abstract Ws1 Carl Lenngren

download 8 Abstract Ws1 Carl Lenngren

of 2

Transcript of 8 Abstract Ws1 Carl Lenngren

  • 7/26/2019 8 Abstract Ws1 Carl Lenngren

    1/2

    WS 1: Pavement Design in Cold Regions

    Cold Region Road Design Dilemma Example from Swedish Road Design

    Code.

    By Carl Lenngren, Lund University

    INTRODUCTION

    Thedesignofpavementstendstothickinordertosustainfrostheaveandparticularly

    unevensettlementsatspringthaw.Typicallymostroadsincoldregiononlycarrylimited

    amountsoftraffic.Thustheinvestmentcostisrelativelyhighforthesetypesofroads,and

    the

    amount

    of

    material

    moved

    is

    high

    per

    vehicle

    tons

    travelled.

    Roughroadsinducehighusercoststhough.Inthepresentpresentationadiscussionis

    carriedonhowtobalancethecoldregionpavementdesignwiththefundsavailablefor

    investmentandtheassociatedusercosts.

    Asinothercountries,Swedishdesigncodestemmedfromempiricalknowledge.By1968the

    designcombattedtwoconcerns,trafficandtheenvironment.Trafficwashandledby

    calculatingtheequivalentnumberofstandardaxlesoveradesignperiod.Theenvironment

    consistedoftheclimateandthenaturalsoilconditions.Laterondrainagewasaddedasan

    environmental

    factor

    of

    concern.

    Originally,

    the

    traffic

    design

    was

    controlled

    by

    adjusting

    the

    thicknessofthebasecourselayer.Theenvironmentaldesignwascontrolledbythethickness

    ofthesubbaselayer.Asthecriteriaforthesubbaselayerwasgraduallyimproved,other

    layerswereintroduced,likefrostprotectionlayersetcetera.Thesemayineffectbe

    consideredaslowergradesubbaselayers.

    In1986thethicknessesweretabulatedforthevariouscategoriesofclimatezones,soil

    materialsanddrainage.Thestrainsatcriticalpointswerecalculatedusinglinearelastic

    programslikeBISARtoderivethevariousdesignstructures.Upuntilthen,thethaw

    weakening

    period

    during

    the

    spring

    was

    considered

    to

    be

    critical

    for

    the

    entire

    design.

    By1994amoredirectapproachtothestraincriteriawastakenwherethesituationduring

    sixseasonswasconsidered.However,thefrostdesignnowwasaddedasaterminthe

    equationindependentofthestraincriteria.Thisdesignisbasedonfrostheaveandthe

    weightoftheroad.

    Thestraincriteriaarebasedonfatigueofboundlayersandpermanentdeformationrateasa

    regressionofthetopofthesubgradeverticalstrain.Inadditionthereisacriterionfor

    roughnessbasedonthedesignspeedandroadcategory.

  • 7/26/2019 8 Abstract Ws1 Carl Lenngren

    2/2

    PROBLEM

    Fromauserpointofview,theexpectedtravellingcostshouldbeaboutthesameforthe

    sametypeofroadcategoryregardlessofthelocation.However,theroadholdercost

    particularlyregardingtheinvestmentismuchhigherincoldclimates.Iftheusercostcriteria

    are

    persisted

    it

    may

    defer

    new

    investments

    in

    cold

    climate

    areas.

    Thenewconceptsofdesignshouldallowforalargervariationoflayerthicknessesand

    qualitiesandthereisalsospecificsoftwarefurnishedbythetransportadministrationto

    assistroaddesignconsultants.Lowvolumeroadsarenowdesignedthicker.Thismeansa

    substantialcostincreaseforatypeofroadthatalreadyhasaverylowproductionperunit

    invested. Typically,incoldregionsthepopulationdensityissparse.Anassetmanagement

    systemmaynotprioritizeroadswithhighinvestmentcosts.Thequestionthenarisesifthe

    ambitionistoohighwiththecurrentcriteria?

    CONCLUSION

    Thecostsforbuildingandmaintainingroadsincoldclimatescanbeenormousifusercosts

    onlygovernthedesign.Somehowitisnotjustifiabletofullycompensatetravelcostswith

    roadholdercostsbeingmorethan100hundredtimeshigherperkmorton*kmbeing

    travelledfortheroadholder. Theextracostsforrougherroadsmusttosomeextentbe

    takenbytheusers.Thereisalimitforroughnessthough.AttheIRIinterval34m/kmroads

    with20100trucksperdaywouldincursuchhighusercoststhatthehigherinvestments

    wouldbemotivated.Fewroadsshouldhavehigherroughnessvaluesthan6m/kmashigher

    maintenancecostcouldbemotivated.

    ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED

    Obviously,frostheaveandunevenfrostheaveacceleratepavementdeterioration.Itcanbe

    measuredasroughness.Theroughnessinturncanbeattributedtousercosts.Isit

    reasonabletoinvestinaheavierstructuretofullycompensatetheusercosts?Orshouldthe

    designallowforasomewhathigherdeteriorationtooptimizethetotal(roadholderand

    user)costs?