1 Impaired Decision Making In Substance Use Disorders Claire Wilcox MD UNM Dept of Psychiatry...

1

Impaired Decision Making In Substance Use Disorders

Claire Wilcox MD

UNM Dept of Psychiatry

Alcohol Medical Scholars Program

© AMSP

2

Case 55 y.o. male Physician High intelligence Methamphetamine dependent Multiple prior treatments Negative consequences: unemployed Repeated relapses Wants to quit

© AMSP

3

This Lecture Will Cover

Neurocognitive aspects

Neurochemical systems

Malfunction in substance use disorder (SUD)

Treatment implications

© AMSP

4

How Are Decisions Made?

Mental process Neurocognitive

Involves 3 stages

• Interconnected

• Experience-driven© AMSP

5

Stage 1: Stimulus Assessment

Preference

Valence

Salience

Context

© AMSP

6

Stage 1:Assessment

Stage 2:Execution

Action selection

Action performance

© AMSP

7

Stage 3: EFFECT!!

Evaluation/feedback: pros and cons of choice© AMSP

8

Stage 1:Assessment

Stage 2:Execution

Stage 3:Effect

Stage 3: Learning

© AMSP

9

Stages in the Case

Stage 2 (Execution)• Became obsessed• Unable to fight impulse

Stage 3 (Effect & Learning)• Use pleasure, relief drug use reinforced

Stage 1 (Assessment)• Saw friend use• Frustrated/stressed

© AMSP

10

Lecture




Treatment implications© AMSP

11

Dopamine

Salience Cost benefit analysis

Action Inhibitory control

‘High’ Learning

© AMSP

Stage 1: Assessment

Stage 2: Execution

Stage 3: Effect & Learning

12

Glutamate

Learning

Stimulus Preference

© AMSP

Stage 1: Assessment

Stage 2: Execution

Stage 3: Learning

13

Noradrenaline Stress response

• Sympathetic NS• CRF release

Focus on task Exploration

© AMSP

Stage 1:Assessment

Stage 2: Execution

Stage 3: Learning

14

Lecture





15

Decision Making In SUDs

Failure at any of 3 stages Biological root Possible pre-morbid deficits Worsened by drug use

• DA release to reward• DA receptor density • NA and CRF to stress

© AMSP

16

Assessment Deficits

Response to cue

Preference,short-term reward/”high”

Stress, cue salience

© AMSP

17

Execution Deficits

Habitual actions favored

• Can’t see other options

Inhibitory control

• Can’t hold back

© AMSP

18

Effect/Learning Deficits

Imbalanced reward encoding• First drug use, reward • Once dependent

o Drug rewardo Further drug consumption

Learning from negative © AMSP

19

Case

Assessment: preference for drug

Execution: inhibitory control

Effect: / response to drug

Learning: response neg consequence

© AMSP

20

Lecture





21

Prevention

Exposure

Target high-risk

• Adolescents

• Genetically vulnerable

• Cognitive probs (schizophrenia, brain injury)

• Stress reactive (depressed/anxious)© AMSP

23

Medications

Negative emotional states drug craving

Methadone (opioid use disorder)

Withdrawal/craving

Brain stress response/ anxiety

Treat co-occurring disorders© AMSP

24

Medications

Cognitive functioninhibitory control

Experimental

• Varenicline (Nicotine Use Disorders)

• Memantine (Alzheimer’s Disease)© AMSP

26

Psychotherapies

Contingency Management Therapy

• Reward changes behaviors

• Learn abstinence earn $$$

Relapse Prevention Therapy

• Identify triggers

• Learn avoidance

© AMSP

27

This lecture covered

Neurocognitive aspects of decision making


How systems can malfunction in SUD

Treatment implications © AMSP

28

Thanks to:

Dr. Ann Manzardo (a power point genius)

Dr. Marc Schuckit (for an excellent learning

experience, and all of his help and time)

Alcohol Medical Scholars Program (for the yummy

food and spectacular hotels)© AMSP

1 Impaired Decision Making In Substance Use Disorders Claire Wilcox MD UNM Dept of Psychiatry...

Documents

Transcript of 1 Impaired Decision Making In Substance Use Disorders Claire Wilcox MD UNM Dept of Psychiatry...