Luiz Tess e Marianna Waltz CA Finanças SP 16 04 14

Post on 10-Mar-2016

212 views 0 download

Tags:

description

 

Transcript of Luiz Tess e Marianna Waltz CA Finanças SP 16 04 14

Brazil: Outlook and Corporate RatingsLuiz Tess , Diretor Geral – BrazilMarianna Waltz, Associate Managing Director – LATAM Corporate Finance

ABRIL 2014

ContentI. Moody’s Local Presence in Latin America and Brazil» Brazil’s sovereign rating history

1. A challenging environmentg g» Post QE and tighter funding conditions for LatAm

» Brazil: below-trend growth, high inflation and negative investor sentiment

2 Brazil: credit quality still holds2. Brazil: credit quality still holds» Sovereign considerations

» Adequate liquidity and debt profile, but expansion plans could be hurt

» Sector overview: mixed trends

2Abril 2014

IMoody’s Local Presence in Latin I America and BrazilI

3Abril 2014

Moody’s Presence in Latin America and Brazil» 3 Moody’s subsidiaries in the region, fully recognized by local regulators

» Mexico City, Mexico (covering Northern Latin America – Mexico, Central America, Venezuela & Colombia)

» Buenos Aires, Argentina (covering Southern Cone and Andean Countries ex-Colombia)

» São Paulo, Brazil

» Moody’s in Brazil: 55 full time employees in two legal entities» Moody’s Analytics: Software, Quantitative Advisory Services & Research in Financial Risk

Management;

» Moody’s América Latina Ltda: CVM registered Rating Agency established in 1997

» Analytical Staff of 25 Analysts and Associate Analysts

» > 260 rating relationships with Corporates, Banks, Insurance Companies, InfrastructureCompanies, Project Finance Issuers, Regional Governments and Issuers of Asset BackedSecurities.

4Abril 2014

» Leading Provider of Asset Management Quality Assessments

Latam Sovereign Credit Quality has Strengthened

LatAm 5 Ratings History

Government of Brazil: LT Issuer Rating (2000 – 2014)

5Abril 2014

Source: Moody’s

A Challenging Environment1 A Challenging Environment1

6Abril 2014

Fed’s QE led to abnormally positive conditions» Quantitative Easing evolved along 3 stages - QE1, QE2, and QE3 - over the last 5 years

» Under the latest, the Fed’s open-ended bond purchases reached $85 billion per month

» QE led to: (1) high global liquidity; (2) historically low interest rates; and (3) substantial inflows to LatAm( ) g g q y; ( ) y ; ( )

Net Capital Inflows to LatAm 5* – 2005 to 2012Global Interest Rate Benchmark - US 10-yr T-Bill (%)

Source: Bloomberg Source: Central Banks and IMF

*LatAm 5: Brazil Mexico Peru Chile and Colombia

7Abril 2014

LatAm 5: Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Chile and Colombia

Tighter funding conditions in a Post QE environment

» Fed started tapering in January and is expected to continue to cut stimulus during the

year

» New environment entails a re-pricing of credit risk and lower appetite for risk exposure:

- More selective investors

- Lower capital flows should be directed to emerging markets

- Higher funding costs

8Abril 2014

Brazil’s macro environment poses additional concerns

» 2014 will be the fourth consecutive year of

below-trend growth

Real GDP Growth (annual rate, %)

below-trend growth

» Inflation has limited pass through ability

» Higher consumer leverage

» Negative investors sentimentInflation ( IPCA, annual rate, %)

» Presidential election adds uncertainty

» Infrastructure projects are highly dependent on

external funding

9Abril 2014

Source: Banco Central do Brazil; IBGE; Moody’s

Credit quality still holds2 Credit quality still holds2

10Abril 2014

Sovereign Considerations

» Brazil´s Baa2/ stable rating already incorporates

2014 expectations of: Gen. Gov. Debt/GDP, 2004-2013

» GDP growth at around 2%

» Debt to GDP above 60%

» Limited fiscal flexibility» Limited fiscal flexibility

» Focus on 2015:

» Negative pressure on the rating in case of:

» Continued low GDP growth associated with annual

rates less than 3% beyond 2014; and/or

Source: Moody’s

» Government debt ratios that exceed 60% of GDP

maintain an upward trend

11Abril 2014

Sovereign Considerations

» Low visibility on government actions for 2015

» No clear direction before presidential elections

» Reversal of investors negative sentiment?

» Fiscal adjustments will be addressed?

» “Reference levels” are key considerations

» What are the reference levels for growth and inflation?g

12Abril 2014

Sovereign Considerations

External Vulnerability Indicator, 2013

13Abril 2014

Source: Moody’s; several domestic sources

Credit Quality still holds

Rated non-financial corporates

» 153 rated non-financial corporates in 17 countries

p

» Rated companies have low refinancing risk:

1) Adequate debt profile and liquidity) q p q y

2) FX exposure mitigated by USD revenues, hedging

instruments and covenants measured in USD

3) Higher exposure is at capital spending needs

Source: Moody’s

14Abril 2014

*LatAm 5: Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Chile and Colombia

1) Adequate Debt Profile and Liquidity» Companies took advantage of favorable capital markets to refinance debt earlier than usual

Debt Amortization Schedule – rated non-financial corporates (in BRL billion)

15Abril 2014

Source: Companies audited financials

1) Adequate Debt Profile and Liquidity» Liquidity risk remains stable

Liquidity – rated non-financial corporates

Source: Companies audited financials and Moody’s estimates

16Abril 2014

Note: Funding risk defined as "LOW" if liquidity available in the next 12/24 months cover more than 150% of debt maturing in the next 12/24 months; as "MEDIUM" if it covers below 150% but above 100%; and "HIGH" if it covers less than 100%.

1) Adequate Debt Profile and Liquidity» Cash decreased 5.4% while ST debt increased 7.8%, leading to still comfortable coverage of 2.2x

Cash coverage – rated non-financial corporates (figures in BRL billion)

17Abril 2014

Source: Companies audited financials

2) FX: exposure has mitigants» FX exposure is mitigated by revenues in USD, hedging and covenants measured in USD

Foreign currency debt as a % of total debt

Sectors most exposed to FX depreciation

18Abril 2014

Source: Companies audited financials

3) Growth capex can be affected

» Non-financial corporates have some dependence on capital markets funding

» Lower availability of funding can delay or even interrupt expansion plans

» In Brazil, BNDES accounts for about 15% of total debt for rated non-financial corporates

Debt Structure In Brazil

Source: Company filings

19Abril 2014

(*) Note: Bank debt in Brazil includes: BNDES, export facilities, CCB/CCI, SHF/Financing to homebuilders and others.

BRAZIL – Sector Overview» More negative actions are expected, although credit quality should remain relatively stable

– 8 positive and 8 negative rating actions in 2013

Rating Outlooks in BrazilRatings Drift 2013 - Actions by Country

20Abril 2014

Source: Moody’s

BRAZIL – Sector Overview» Trends are mixed, depending on the sector

» Main performance drivers:

– Brazil will grow less than LatAm peers average

– Negative investors sentiment and more selective capital markets

Hi h i fl ti li it th h bilit– High inflation limits pass through ability

– Weaker BRL helps exports, but pressures USD debt

– Commodity prices should remain at lower levels

» Outlook is positive for protein and heavy construction sectors, while homebuilders and steel companies should face more challenges

21Abril 2014

Source: Moody’s

Main contacts – LATAM Corporate FinanceSão Paulo +55 (11) 3043 7300São Paulo +55 (11) 3043-7300

Marianna Waltz Associate Managing Director - AMD +55 (11) 3043-7309 marianna.waltz@moodys.com

Soummo Mukherjee VP-Sr Credit Officer +55 (11) 3043-7341 soummo.mukherjee@moodys.com

Barbara Mattos VP-Senior Analyst +55 (11) 3043-7357 barbara.mattos@moodys.com

Cristiane Spercel AVP, Analyst +55 (11) 3043-7333 cristiane.spercel@moodys.com

Erick Rodrigues AVP, Analyst +55 (11) 3043-7345 erick.rodrigues@moodys.com

Carolina Chimenti Associate Analyst +55 (11) 3043-7318 carolina.chimenti@moodys.com

Fernando Simis Associate Analyst +55 (11) 3043-7332 fernando.simis@moodys.com

Vitor Martins Associate Analyst +55 (11) 3043-7348 vitor.martins@moodys.com

J ã M h d P h l A i t A l t +55 (11) 3043 6080 j h l@ dJoão Machado Paschoal Associate Analyst +55 (11) 3043-6080 joao.paschoal@moodys.com

Mexico City +52 (55) 1253-5700

Nymia Almeida VP-Sr Credit Officer +52 (55) 1253-5707 nymia.almeida@moodys.com

Alonso Sanchez AVP, Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5706 alonso.sanchezrosario@moodys.com

Gabriel Vigueras VP Senior Analyst +52 (55) 1253 5700 gabriel vigueras@moodys comGabriel Vigueras VP-Senior Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5700 gabriel.vigueras@moodys.com

Sandra Beltran Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5718 sandra.beltran@moodys.com

Kijana Mack Associate Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5700 kijana.mack@moodys.com

Rosa Morales Associate Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5746 rosa.morales@moodys.com

Whitney Leavens Associate Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5748 whitney.leavens@moodys.com

Diana Gonzalez Associate Analyst +52 (55) 1253-5700 diana.gonzalez@moodys.com

Buenos Aires +54 (11) 5129-2600

Veronica Amendola VP, Senior Analyst +54 (11) 5129-2610 veronica.amendola@moodys.com

Martina Gallardo Analyst +54 (11) 5129-2600 martina.gallardo@moodys.com

22Abril 2014

y ( ) g @ y

Alejandro Kalogiannidis Associate Analyst +54 (11) 5129-2600 alejandro. kalogiannidis @moodys.com

© 2012 Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and/or its licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved.

CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (“MIS”) AND ITS AFFILIATES ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S (“MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS”) MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE.

ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED,

DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTENCONSENT.

All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including when appropriate independent third party sources However MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validatesources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process. Under no circumstances shall MOODY’S have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error (negligent or otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the control of MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees or agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation, analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential, compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY’S is advised in advance of the possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to use, any such information. The ratings, financial reporting analysis, projections, and other observations, if any, constituting part of the information contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell or hold any securities. Each user of the information contained herein must make its own study and evaluation of each security it may consider purchasing, holding or selling.

NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER.

MIS, a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MIS have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MIS for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Shareholder Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.”

Any publication into Australia of this document is by MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657, which holds Australian Financial Services License no. 336969. This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to p y g p y g y pMOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, credit ratings assigned on and after October 1, 2010 by Moody’s Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) are MJKK’s current opinions of the relative future credit risk of entities, credit commitments, or debt or debt-like securities. In such a case, “MIS” in the foregoing statements shall be deemed to be replaced with “MJKK”. MJKK is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO.

This credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be dangerous for retail investors to make any investment decision based on this credit rating. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser.

24Abril 2014