Biotic Resistance What can stop invasive species? Liz Schultheis April 21, 2011.
WORKPACKAGE 4 Collection & Transport O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis, K. Fischer
-
Upload
buckminster-dixon -
Category
Documents
-
view
12 -
download
1
description
Transcript of WORKPACKAGE 4 Collection & Transport O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis, K. Fischer
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
WORKPACKAGE 4
Collection & Transport
O. Tabasaran, D. Steinbach, A. Schultheis, K. Fischer
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection & Transport
40 –70% of the waste disposal costs
Efficient collection and transport system must consider:
• Size of the waste collection area
• Economic structure
• Consumption habits
• Building area specifications
• Demands of the users
• Choice of a suitable collection system
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection system
• Collection method
• Container systems
• Waste vehicles
• Staff
Diverse structures in the collection area often require several collection systems
Transport system
• Direct regional transport
• Transfer station
• Transport out of the region
Related to the situation combination of different transport systems may be necessary
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Decisions to take
• What to collect
• Collection system
• Transport system
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Waste fractions
• Paper• Glass• Light fraction • Metals• Bio-waste• Green waste• WEEE• Hazardous waste
.
.
.
Important pre-condition for the decision:
• Waste quantities
• Waste composition
• Development of waste • quantities during the last • decade
Decision influences:
• Costs
• Environmental aspects
• National law
• EC regulations (packaging, • landfill, WEEE directives)
• Market aspects
What should be collected separately?
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
How should the waste be collected?
Bring system
• Central collection points
• Civic amenity sites
Kerbside system
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Decision for bring or kerbside collection
Bring systems Kerbside system
High/low density building
++ low density ++ high density
Costs + -
Quality ++ +
Amount - +
User friendliness - ++
Waste fraction no biowaste for all fractions
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Central collection points:
City Inhabitants/ container
Paper [kg/c*a]
Glass [kg/c*a]
Bamberg `92 1,600 13.3 10.4
Schweinfurt `92 1,300 16.0 14.8
Bochum '91 900 23.5 16.6
Average of 11 cities 1997
700 47.6
Stuttgart 1990 750 - 21.0
Stuttgart 2000 570 - 27.2
Collectable amounts according to the system
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
City Paper [kg/c*a] Glass [kg/c*a]
Bochum 7.7 1.7
Mainz
> 10,000 inhabitants
per site 7.8 3.6
Civic amenity site:
The amounts collected highly depend on the location
• central
• easy to reach
• clean
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Paper Glass
Amount collected [kg/c*a]
Degree of collection
[%]
Amount collected [kg/c*a]
Degree of collection
[%]
Mono-bin
Average of 11 cities
Stuttgart 2000
40-60
68
97
67-100 15-35 38-90
Multi-fraction-bin 30-50 50-83 12-30 31-77
Bag 5-25 8-42 5-20 13-51
Kerbside collection paper/ glass:
Paper potential 1992: 60kg/c*a Glass potential 1992: 39 kg/c*a
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Kerbside collection bio-waste [kg/c*a]
Bag 30-60
Bin 90-100
Inner-city 65-70
Housing areas minimum 3 floors
55-65
1-2 family houses 140-180
Low density housing areas 115-175
Rural areas 85-95
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
What method should be used
Containers to be emptied:Normally used for household waste and similar to household waste collection
Containers to be changed:Mostly used for industrial/commercial waste
One way bags:Often used for textiles and light weight fraction
Collection not using bins/bagsSuitable for bulky waste collection
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
What kind of containers are suitable
Decision criteria for container systems:
• Economy (different container sizes, number of loaders, efficiency)
• Physical strains of the workers
• Hygiene
• Building area aspects
• Users concerns (fees, comfort, space)
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Dustbins
• 35 l to 110 l
• no wheels
• high physical strains
• need much time for • collection
Large refuse containers
• 60 l to 5000 l
• wheeled
• easy to move (safety standard for workers)
• standardized for automatic or hydraulic lifter systems
• large containers to be lifted automatically by the• driver or by the help of loaders
Kerbside collection
Bring systems
Containers from about 800 to 4000 litres, normally emptied into trucks with special loading equipment
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Systems for separate collection
Integrated systems:
separated waste and residual waste are collected at the same time with different bins or two - chamber bins in a two - or multi - chamber waste truck
Alternating systems:
separated waste and residual waste are collected alternating
Additive systems:
separated waste is collected additional to the residual waste
• minimum truck traffic• high invest costs (trucks)• economically sound • collection
• reduced truck traffic• no special trucks needed• reduced flexibility for • collection frequency
• high truck traffic• high collection costs• many fractions can be • collected separately• high collection flexibility
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Kind and number of containers needed
Decisions already taken:
• what to collect
• kerbside and/ or bring system
• collection method
• Additive, alternating or integrated• system
to collect one or several fractions• in one bin
Decisions to take
to use two- (multi-) chambered bins
to use several mono bins
obligatory or voluntary collection for • the different fractions
Container volume required
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
To calculate the required container volume needs:
• Probable amount to be collected per capita and year (bring/ kerbside)
• Number of people connected (obligatory/ voluntary collection)
• Volume weights of the fractions to be collected per bin
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Kerbside Stuttgart 1999/2001 Bring
Bins 60 litres 120 litres 240 litres 1,100 litres > 1,500 litres
[kg/m³]
Paper - 180 150 120 110
Biowaste 200 210 230 - -
Glass - - - - 190
Residual waste 160 200 180 150 -
Stuttgart container volume provided needed
Residual waste: 42 litres/c*w 25 litres/c*w
Bio-waste: 7 litres/c*w 4.5 litres/c*w
Paper: 17 litres/c*w 14 litres/c*w
Volume weight of different fractions and containers in Stuttgart
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Central collection points
Calculation of the volume needed per year
Range of volume weight [kg/m³]
Average of volume weight [kg/m³]
Paper 90-140 110
Glass 160-210 190
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Containers needed for collection
• 1 container size but different collection intervals
• different container sizes according to different building areas (1 family houses to high rise buildings)
Decisions to take:
• collection frequency
• container sizes
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection vehiclesCollection vehicles:
• Chassis + driver cabin
• Body with waste storage chamber and compaction aggregate
• Lifter system
Chassis: 2 or 3 axles chassis
• collection area (inner-city, suburbs)
• amount to be collected within one tour
• kind of waste collected (loading capacity)
must be combined according to the specific requirements
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Compaction principles:
• very good crushing and compaction of the waste
• not suitable for waste that is collected to be recycled
Packer body with pressing platesRotary drum
• very good waste compaction
• suitable for all kinds of waste
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
• lifter systems for 2 containers until 240 litres
• lifters for two smaller and one large container
• lifters for all container sizes
• lifters for two-chamber containers and vehicles
From 80 - 5,000 litres2 container until 360 or 1 container of 1100 liters
Lifter systems lifter pick-ups
• comb
• diamond
• swivel-arm
Two chamber container lifter
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Loader systems
The loader systems can be combined
with the various chassis, compaction
and lifter systems
Rear loader
Side loader
Front loader
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Side loader• particularly for suburb areas
• safe and quick loading
• right wheeled
• driver watches the emptying
• pressing during driving
• driver is loader (1 worker only needed)
• containers can also be emptied without leaving the driver cabin
• reduced accident risks
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Front loader
• especially for large containers
• safe and quick loading
• driver watches the emptying
• pressing during driving
• driver is loader (1 worker only needed)
• containers can also be emptied without leaving the driver cabin
• reduced accident risks
The “Fast Eater”
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Comparison between a rear and side loader
Both vehicles made the same tour emptying 80, 120 and 240 litres bins
Invest costs.
Rear loader: 260,000 DM
Side loader: 340,000 DM
Assurance, maintenance, diesel, the same for both
Costs per minute:
Rear loader: 1.02 DM/minute
Side loader: 1.17 DM/minute
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Rear loader Side loader
Staff1 driver
1 loader1 driver
Time for container emptying
55 min 60 min
Cost/vehicle 56.1 DM 70.2 DM
Staff costs 66 DM 36 DM
Total 122.10 106,20
Result
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Comparison between a rear and front loader
Emptying of 5 m³ containers
Invest costs.
Rear loader: 260,000 DM
Front loader: 300,000 DM
Assurance, maintenance, diesel, the same for both
Costs per minute:
Rear loader: 1.02 DM/minute
Front loader: 1.09 DM/minute
Emptying time:
Rear loader: 4.36 minutes
Front loader: 1.56 minutes
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Result
Rear loader Rear loader Front loader
Staff1 driver
1 loader1 driver 1 driver
Time for container emptying
4.36 minutes 4.36 minutes 1.56 minutes
Cost/vehicle 4.96 DM 4.96 DM 2.10 DM
Staff costs 5.52 DM 2.76 DM 1.16 DM
Total 10.21 DM 7.45 DM 3.26 DM
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Vehicle body: 2 principle systems
Fixed body: Chassis and body are fixed
Demountable container system:
• chassis and body can be separated
• separation of collection and transportation
• the full demountable container is deposited at a transfer point, an empty container is picked up
• thus waste collection vehicles can return immediately and continue on their collection route
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection service
Full service Loaders take the bins out of the properties for collection and bring the emptied bins back
Especially in inner-city areas and for large bins
Cost intensive as more loaders or more time are needed
No full service Inhabitants take their bins to the street and bring the emptied bins back
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Stuttgart
• Several valleys
• Some hills
• From 207-550 m
About 45% of the city require increased efforts for waste collection
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Area [km²]
Inhabitants
Inner-city 48 185,841
Suburbs 160 365,615
Total 208 551,456
Population
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Waste collection in Stuttgart
Responsible departments of Stuttgart authority:
• Department of waste (1st step of going private)
• Environmental department (sewage sludge, landfill planning)
• Park and cemetery department (green waste composting)
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Regulations:
Packaging Ordinance (1991):
Packaging manufacturers and distributors must take back their packages for recycling
Companies from the packaging and consumer
goods industry founded the DSD system
Financed by licensing the trademark “the green dot” to fillers, packers, importers
For each packaging the consumer pays a small amount
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Act for Promoting Closed Substance Cycle Waste Management and Ensuring Environmentally Compatible Waste Disposal
must firstly be avoided especially by reducing its amount and noxiousness
must secondly
be subjected to substance recycling or
used to obtain energy
Waste,
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
What Stuttgart collects separately
Glass PaperLight fraction (packaging)
Bio-wasteResidual
waste
Green waste
Hazardous waste
Textiles WEEE
For DSD system
Collection association
of 6 firms
Collected by the authority
1 firm 3 firms
Responsibilities of waste collection
Charity organisations
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Paper every 3 weeks obligatory
LWF every 3 weeks obligatoryResidual waste weekly or obligatory
every 2 weeks (biowaste)Bio-waste weekly voluntaryGreen waste twice a year voluntaryBulky waste twice a year voluntaryWEEE twice a year voluntaryTextiles very often voluntary
Glass container voluntary
Hazardous waste special vehicle voluntaryTextiles container voluntary
Bring system
Kerbside
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Development of waste quantities
1990 1995 2000
Separately collected
57,118 77,474 86,240
Residual waste
291,741 192,056 161,844
Total 348,859 269,530 248,084
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Paper collection: obligatory
Amount collected separately:
1995: 46,350 tons/a 82 kg/c*a2000: 56,545 tons/a 97 kg/c*a
Collection system: until 1990 bring
since 1990 kerbside
Collection frequency: every 3 weeks
Service: full service
Containers:
120 litres: 39,218240 litres: 39,4081100 litres: 14,962
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Staff: 1 driver/ 3 loaders for containers <360 litres 1 driver/ 2 loaders for containers >360 litres
17 drivers and 38 loaders daily
Containers emptied per loader*day:
containers <360 litres 218 containers/loader*dcontainers >360 litres 94 containers/loader*d
Transport distance to the recycling plant: 7 km (3 times per day)
Daily km to drive per collection vehicle: 66 km
Tons collected per collection vehicle and day: 14 tons
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Costs for paper collection and transport:
Containers 41 DM/tonLoaders: 121 DM/tonVehicle: 33 DM/ton
Total: 195 DM/ton
19.1 % of the paper collected is packaging paper
DSD pays the collection costs for the packaging paper
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Biowaste collection: voluntary
Amount collected separately:
1995: 590 tons/a (testing phase)2000: 14,975 tons/a 102 kg/per inhabitant connected
connected people: 146,838
Collection system: kerbside
Collection frequency: weekly
Service: no full service
Containers:
80 litres: 9,290
120 litres: 11,170
240 litres: 2,528
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Staff: 1 driver/ 1 loader 11 drivers and 11 loaders daily
Containers emptied per loader*day:
containers <360 litres 250 containers/loader*d
Transport distance to composting plant: 40 km (demountable excel system)
Daily km to drive per collection vehicle: 72 km
Tons collected per collection vehicle*day: 9 tons
Costs for bio-waste collection and transport:
Containers: 19 DM/tonDriver: 19 DM/tonLoaders: 30 DM/tonVehicle: 19 DM/ton
Total: 87 DM/ton
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Light weight fraction: obligatory
Amount collected separately:
1995: 7,724 tons/a 13.7 kg/c*a2000: 6,800 tons/a 12.3 kg/c*a
Collection in yellow bags (90 l volume, transparent)
Collection frequency: every 3 weeks
Service: no full service
Responsibility is not with Stuttgart authority
3 firms of the collection association collect in different city districts
Bags collected per vehicle/d:
2,687 bags/vehicle*d
(Average of 40 cities with the same collection system)
Staff: 1 driver 2 loaders
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Amount collected separately:
1995: 14,816 tons/a 26 kg/c*a2000: 15,901 tons/a 27 kg/c*a
Collection system: bring
Responsibility is not with theStuttgart authority
1 firm of the collection associationcollects in all city districts
Glass separately collected: voluntary
Container volume provided:
671 m³ green glass
661 m³ white glass
523 m³ brown glass
Container quantity:
1030 containers: total
282 containers: 2.6 m³
748 containers: 1.5 m³
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection system: kerbside
Collection frequency: twice a year (spring/autumn)(private households):
Green waste total: 27,535 tons [47 kg/c*a]
From the city (parks, zoo, cemeteries): ca. 12,000 tons (1995)
From private households: 15,535 tons
Green waste separately collected: voluntary
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Hazardous waste sep. collected: voluntary
Schadstoffmobil: 155 tons/a
0.3 kg/c*a
(batteries, waste paint, solvents…)
Collection system: bring
Collection frequency: 4-6 times/year
Costs for collection and transport:
Driver: 850 DM/ton
Chemist: 2,285 DM/ton
Vehicle: 1,422 DM/ton
Total: 5,295 DM/ton
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Textiles and shoes by charity organisations (Red Cross, Johanniter,….)
Bring systems and kerbside systems (minimum every month)
No collection quantities available
Textiles separately collected: voluntary
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Residual waste collection: obligatory
Amount collected:
1995: 192,056 tons/a 340 kg/c*a2000: 131,289 tons/a 238 kg/c*a
Collection system: kerbside
Collection frequency: once a week(without bio-bin)every two weeks(with bio-bin)
Service: full service
Containers:
80 litres: 10,997120 litres: 51,690240 litres: 26,7781100 litres: 9,555
Staff:
1 driver/ 3 loaders for containers <360 litres 1 driver/ 2 loaders for containers >360 litres 1 driver/ 2 loaders for mixed collection34 drivers and 75 loaders daily
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Containers emptied per loader*day:
containers <360 litres 220 containers/loader*dcontainers >360 litres 78 containers/loader*dMixed collection 165 containers/loader*d
Transport distance to the incineration plant: 10 km (3 times per day)Daily km to drive per collection vehicle: 98 kmTons collected per collection vehicle and day: 17 tons
Costs for residual waste collection and transport:
Containers: 15 DM/tonDriver: 52 DM/tonLoaders: 99 DM/tonVehicle: 34 DM/ton
Total: 200 DM/ton
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection system: kerbside
3 bulky waste fractions are collectedseparately (year 2000):
• Combustible bulky waste 20,411 tons 37.0 kg/c*a
• Electrical/ electronic equipment 2,595 tons 4.7 kg/c*a
• Refrigerators/freezers 544 tons 1.0 kg/c*a
Collection frequency: twice a year
Bulky waste collection: voluntary
Transport distance to the incineration plant: 10 km (3 times/day)
Daily km to drive per collection vehicle: 57 km
Tons collected per collection vehicle and day: 15 tons
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Staff: 1 driver/ 3 loaders for combustible bulky waste1 driver/ 3 loaders for electrical/ electronic equipment1 driver/ 2 loaders for freezers
9 drivers and 28 loaders daily
Costs for bulky waste collection and transport
Refrigerators/freezers 525 DM/tonElectrical/ electronic equipment 246 DM/ton
Combustible bulky waste
Driver 32 DM/tonLoader 86 DM/tonVehicle 26 DM/ton Total 144 DM/ton
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
Collection vehiclesDaily use: 53 collection vehicles (paper, bio-waste, residual waste
+ 10 collection vehicles for bulky waste
In reserve: 22 collection vehicles
Residual waste
Bio-waste Paper Bulky waste
Packer body
(-17 m³)16 5 8
Rotary drum 12 3 9
Demountable 8 2
Rennes, November 2001 – ISWA / Cemagref
WP4AWAST
design: Inge Hengl /awast-system-level1.dsf
R. Fehringer, 2001 - completed by M.Brumbach
Level 1: total system
collection& transport
of waste(CT)
system boundary "AWAST"
other wasterelevant pro-cesses (OWP)
private house-hold (PHH)
trade, industry,business, service(TIBS)
(recycling)products
importedwaste
residues
emissionsCT
resourcesCT
untreatedwaste
exportedwaste
pretreatedwaste
treatedwaste
waste totreatment
emissionsTW
neighbouringregion (NR)
treatmentof waste
(TW)
transportof treatedwaste (T)
landfill(L)
neighbouringregion (NR) other regions
suppliesTW
resourcesTW
emissionsT
resourcesT
emissionsL
resourcesL
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
environment(ENV)
trade, industry,buseiness, service
(TIBS)
trade, industry,business, service(TIBS)
suppliesCT
suppliesL
trade, industry,business, service(TIBS)
suppliesT
trade, industry,buseiness, service
(TIBS)
trade, industry,business, service(TIBS)
Residual waste (?)
Bulky waste (SCB)
Values:Biowaste (SCS)Paper and cardboard (SCS)Metal scrap (SCB)
Hazardous waste (?)
Values:Glass (SCS)/Rhenus private firmPackaging (SCS)/DSD
TBS - same fractions as PHHIndustrial waste
Industrial waste,values/firms??
Green waste and christmas trees (COO)Road waste (COR)
Sewage sludge (TSS)/ office for waste water
Responsibility: city of StuttgartResponsibility: others
Fuel, oil, etc
Residual waste (TI)/neighbours
wastePHH
wasteTIBS
wasteOWP
??
Exhaust gas, etc
City/others
City/others
Not in Stuttgart
Not in Stuttgart
City/others
Part ofFuel, oil, etc
??/othersFuel, oil, etc/others
Exhaust gas, etc/others
??/others
Part ofExhaust gas, etc
??/others
slag
City/others Ashes, salt
Money, material etc
Exhaust gas, leachate etc
City/others biowaste
Hazardous waste
City/others
Green wastecomposting,incineration of sludge
Sortingof packaging,Incineration
Industrial waste
Residues, mineral waste/neighbours
others