What about the "social" in "social innovation"?
-
Upload
esf-agentschap-vlaanderen -
Category
Government & Nonprofit
-
view
202 -
download
2
Transcript of What about the "social" in "social innovation"?
What about the “social” in “social innovation”?
lessons from the CRESSI Project
Nadia von Jacobi University of Pavia
Brussels, 26.10.2015 [email protected]
Index • Social in ends, social in means • The Capability Approach as conceptual guide • Social ends (I): pluralism and complexity • Social means (I): agency and empowerment • Social ends (II): social forces and their gaps • Social means (II): affecting social forces • Practical Implications
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Social Innovation in
“the development and delivery of new ideas and solutions
(products, services, models, markets, processes) at different socio-structural levels that
intentionally seek to change power relations and
improve human capabilities, as well as the processes via which these solutions are carried out”
(Nicholls and Ziegler, 2014:14)
Brussels, 26.10.2015 Nadia von Jacobi
Coop. Int e Pol. per lo Sviluppo
social ends social means
Social Innovation pursues and consists of...
Social ends: why Capabilities? • expanding capabilities • more than resources • differences in conversion • the role of agency • choices • observing functionings • plural values Social progress as
‘the expansion of opportunities’ Brussels, 26.10.2015 Nadia von Jacobi
Amartya Sen’s Development as Freedom
Conversion factors Capability set
individual traits
local mechanisms of (re)distri-
bution
Income
Institu-tions
Infra-structure
Possible Choices
Individual and collective resources
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Agency
"what a person is free to do and to achieve
in pursuit of whatever goals he or she regards as important"
(Sen, A. 1985, 206)
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Agency in society
"what one can do as member of a group, collectivity
or political community " (Alkire, S. 2009, 37)
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Empowerment access to
information
local organizational
capacity
social mobilization
participation in decision-
making
accountability
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Agency and Power
Agency
self-direction
Power
power over power to
power with power from
within
Empower-ment
in society
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Synthesis
Social Innovation
Change in Process
Addressing a Social Need
Coop. Int e Pol. per lo Sviluppo
Social progress from a capabilities perspective:
Expansion of
substantive freedoms
Expansion of process freedoms
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Capability deprivation and marginalisation
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
• lack of resources • reduced conversion ability
Lack of Opportunities
• insufficient power • forces affecting choices
Lack of Agency
Marginalisation
”the result of a social process that transforms
personal, social and environmental traits into potential factors of
disadvantage" (Chiappero, E. and von Jacobi, N. 2014,3)
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Multiple role of social and environmental factors
adapted from CRESSI
Brussels, 26.10.2015 Nadia von Jacobi Agency
An integration to the Capability Approach: social theory
Brussels, 26.10.2015 Nadia von Jacobi
CRESSI based on Beckert (2010)
• Adopts a multidimensional, plural appreciation of disadvantage in society and searches for equally multidimensional and plural strategies to overcome it
• Marginalisation is ‘institutionally embedded’ (Beckert, 2009: 264), and requires the targeting of social processes
Synthesis of CRESSI framework
Brussels, 26.10.2015 Nadia von Jacobi
Practical Implications
Effective social innovation
capable of tackling marginalisation depends on:
the active participation of marginalized individuals in a process that addresses
the social structuration of their disadvantage
Brussels, 26.10.2015 Nadia von Jacobi
Which frictions and challenges in combining top-down implementation logic and the Capability Approach
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Risks of top-down logic • concentrate on intentional creation • simplify the motivations of people • homogenise people into ‘target groups’ in line with
specific labels (e.g. unemployed, youth, women, etc.)
• underestimate the complexity of reality • presume neutrality with respect to existing
asymmetries of power • evaluate results and outcomes on the base of
predefined indicators
Coop. Int e Pol. per lo Sviluppo Nadia von Jacobi
Nadia von Jacobi
Top-down-logic Capabilities Perspective
ultimate scope pre-defined targets outcomes that people value
focal point production of things influence on the lives of people
attention/focus intended effects full range of effects (including unintended)
general objectives project/policy objectives opportunity freedoms
specific objectives target outcomes local empowerment with learning, visioning, choice and cooperation
procedural focus engineering process freedoms
aims for improvement efficiency in use of resources; facilitate coordinated action
informed deliberation, affect social structuration
transversal characteristics transparency, achievability, accountability
pluralism, tolerance, equity
discourse target population/beneficiaries
agents of change
Brussels, 26.10.2015
Risks of top-down logic
to undermine pluralism in values
to hamper agency
to prevent changes in social structuration
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Interdependencies: goodness of fit
Institution
Belief system
Comple-mentary
Institution
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Interdependencies: goodness of fit
Institution
Belief system
Comple-mentary
Institution
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Interdependencies: goodness of fit
Belief system
Comple-mentary
Institution
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Which value added of social innovation?
• Identification of collective interests
• Formulation of requests
Collective Preferences
• Experiments • Failures,
adjustments, new attempts
Shared Struggles • Identification of
collective interests • Consolidation
Institutionalization
Ownership
Adaptation
Coevolution of different factors
Cultural freedom, pluralism of values
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Cultural Freedom and Social Progress
Efforts for Social
Progress
More Opportunities
Engaging in Activities
In Line with Own Values
New Goals for Social
Progress
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Political competition, values, experiments
Political Competition
Values and Beliefs
(Pluralism)
Opening up to New
Solutions
Encounters, Experiments
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Encounters, experiments, competition
Reduction of social cleavage
Network of unrelated
people
Social Capital
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
Endogeneous growth and its components
Engaging in problem solving
Experience and general knowledge creation
Sharing of knowledge, replication, spill-overs
Increases in productivity and growth
Cumulative
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015
CRESSI Publications • D1.1. Chapter 3 How can Sen’s ‘Capabilities Approach’ contribute to understanding the role of social innovations for the marginalised? (Chiappero and von Jacobi), CRESSI Working Paper 3/2015 • D3.5. Toolkit (Methodology) (von Jacobi, Chiappero, Giroletti, Maestripieri, Ceravolo), CRESSI Working Paper 16/2015 • D6.1. EU Public Policy, Social Innovation and Marginalisation: Reconciling ambitions with policy instruments (Edmiston), CRESSI Working Paper 18/2015
Nadia von Jacobi Brussels, 26.10.2015