Versaic vs. Packaged Philanthropy Management Systems

1
Implementation: Unclear depending on the availability of internal IT resources, budget and fit with the out-of-the-box template. Year one: From the start, you’ve noticed nuances that aren’t quite right and inefficiencies in how your system is implemented but you’ve used up your allotted vendor consultation time. You make do, but it requires extra steps and more work from your team. Five years later: You’re stuck with the same system you had when you first started out. It’s not updated to reflect your current needs or processes. It’s too costly to update and you don’t have IT resources to maintain the system. You aren’t able to collect impact data automatically and it’s almost impossible to respond to management’s demands for ad hoc reports. Your team is frustrated, your grantees aren’t supported and things are falling through the cracks. Implementation: With the help of your dedicated, experienced client success manager, you’re up and running from start to finish in one month. Year one: You have full support for your team and your grantees, the system is configured exactly the way you want and your program is totally streamlined. Five years later: Your system has been updated along the way to incorporate any new programs or focus areas, team members, processes, or requirements. You’re using the latest grants management features including full Impact Reporting and scorecards for committee reviews. You’ve added programs across divisions or regions of your company and everything is fully integrated for maximum efficiency without the need for a system overhaul. Your team is thrilled and management understands the exact impact your programs are having. How is Your Grants Management System Working for You? Time to switch? VERSAIC FAST, EFFORTLESS, FLEXIBLE PACKAGED SOLUTIONS INEFFICIENT, COSTLY, BRITTLE www.versaic.com 877-712-9495

Transcript of Versaic vs. Packaged Philanthropy Management Systems

Page 1: Versaic vs. Packaged Philanthropy Management Systems

!! !!

Implementation: Unclear depending on the availability of internal IT resources, budget and fit with the out-of-the-box template.

Year one: From the start, you’ve noticed nuances that aren’t quite right and inefficiencies in how your system is implemented but you’ve used up your allotted vendor consultation time. You make do, but it requires extra steps and more work from your team.

Five years later: You’re stuck with the same system you had when you first started out. It’s not updated to reflect your current needs or processes.

It’s too costly to update and you don’t have IT resources to maintain the system.

You aren’t able to collect impact data automatically and it’s almost impossible to respond to management’s demands for ad hoc reports.

Your team is frustrated, your grantees aren’t supported and things are falling through the cracks.

Implementation: With the help of your dedicated, experienced client success manager, you’re up and running from start to finish in one month.

Year one: You have full support for your team and your grantees, the system is configured exactly the way you want and your program is totally streamlined.

Five years later: Your system has been updated along the way to incorporate any new programs or focus areas, team members, processes, or requirements.

You’re using the latest grants management features including full Impact Reporting and scorecards for committee reviews.

You’ve added programs across divisions or regions of your company and everything is fully integrated for maximum efficiency without the need for a system overhaul.

Your team is thrilled and management understands the exact impact your programs are having.

How is Your Grants Management System Working for You?

Time to switch?

VERSAIC FAST, EFFORTLESS, FLEXIBLE

PACKAGED SOLUTIONS INEFFICIENT, COSTLY, BRITTLE

www.versaic.com 877-712-9495