TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RENAISSANCE … · Level of Service Standards and Measure of...

TRAFFICIMPACTSTUDYFORTHEPROPOSED

RENAISSANCEEASTPROJECTINTHECITYOFRIALTO

Preparedby:

Kimley-HornandAssociates,Inc.765TheCityDrive,Suite200

Orange,California92868

August2017

TABLEOFCONTENTSPage

I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1A. PurposeandObjectivesoftheStudy ...................................................................................... 1B. SitePlanLocationandStudyArea .......................................................................................... 1C. DevelopmentProjectIdentification ........................................................................................ 3D. DevelopmentProjectDescription ........................................................................................... 3E. AnalysisMethodology ............................................................................................................. 5

1. Intersection Analysis – HCM Methodology .......................................................... 52. Level of Service Standards and Measure of Significance ...................................... 5

II. AREACONDITIONS ...................................................................................................................... 8A. Identify Study Area and Intersections........................................................................................ 8B. DescriptionofExistingRoads,TrafficControlsandIntersectionGeometrics ....................... 9C. ExistingTrafficVolumes ....................................................................................................... 12D. ExistingDelayandLevelofService ...................................................................................... 15E. GeneralPlanCirculationElement ......................................................................................... 15F. TransitService ...................................................................................................................... 19

III. PROJECTEDFUTURETRAFFIC .................................................................................................. 19A. ProjectTraffic........................................................................................................................ 19

1. Project Trip Generation ...................................................................................... 192. Trip Distribution and Assignment ...................................................................... 21

B. ExistingPlusGrowthPlusProjectTraffic(OpeningYear2018) .......................................... 211. Ambient Growth Rate ........................................................................................ 252. Opening Year 2018 Existing Plus Growth .......................................................... 253. Opening Year 2018 Existing Plus Growth Plus Project ....................................... 25

C. CumulativeConditions(ExistingPlusGrowthPlusCumulativeProjects) ........................... 311. Cumulative Projects ........................................................................................... 312. Background Growth Rate ................................................................................... 313. Cumulative Projects Trip Generation.................................................................. 354. Cumulative Projects Trip Distribution and Assignment ...................................... 355. Opening Year 2018 Cumulative Without Project Conditions .............................. 356. Opening Year 2018 Cumulative Plus Project Conditions .................................... 40

IV. MITIGATIONMEASURES ........................................................................................................... 44A. IntersectionImprovements .................................................................................................. 44B. RoadwayImprovements ....................................................................................................... 44C. SignificantImpacts–OtherImprovements .......................................................................... 44

V. FINDINGSANDRECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................... 46A. Improvements ....................................................................................................................... 46B. TrafficSignalWarrantAnalysis ............................................................................................ 46C. SiteCirculation ...................................................................................................................... 46D. SafetyandOperationalImprovements ................................................................................. 47E. FairShareCalculations ......................................................................................................... 47F. SpecificPlanSignalization .................................................................................................... 47G. GeneralPlanConformance ................................................................................................... 47H. RegionalFundingMechanisms ............................................................................................. 47

APPENDICES

APPENDIXA: APPROVEDSCOPINGAGREEMENTAPPENDIXB: TRAFFICCOUNTDATASHEETSAPPENDIXC: PCEWORKSHEETSAPPENDIXD: INTERSECTIONANALYSISWORKSHEETSAPPENDIXE: CUMULATIVEPROJECTSINFORMATION

LISTOFFIGURES

PageFigure1–VicinityMap ................................................................................................................................ 2Figure2–ProjectSitePlan .......................................................................................................................... 4Figure3–ExistingLaneConfigurationandTrafficControl ...................................................................... 10Figure4–StreetSection–AyalaDrive ..................................................................................................... 11Figure5–StreetSection–RenaissanceParkway ..................................................................................... 13Figure6–ExistingDailyandPeakHourTrafficVolumes ......................................................................... 14Figure7–RenaissanceSpecificPlanAmendmentVehicularCirculationPlan ......................................... 18Figure8–ProjectTripDistribution .......................................................................................................... 22Figure9–Project-RelatedTrafficVolumes............................................................................................... 23Figure10–OpeningYear2018LaneConfigurationandTrafficControl ................................................. 24Figure11–OpeningYear2018–ExistingPlusGrowthTrafficVolumes ................................................. 26Figure12–OpeningYear2018–ExistingPlusGrowthPlusProjectTrafficVolumes............................. 27Figure13–LocationofCumulativeProjects ............................................................................................. 34Figure14–CumulativeProjectsTrafficVolumes ..................................................................................... 36Figure15–OpeningYear2018CumulativeWithoutProjectTrafficVolumes ........................................ 37Figure16–OpeningYear2018CumulativePlusProjectTrafficVolumes ............................................... 41

LISTOFTABLESPage

Table1–SummaryofIntersectionOperation–ExistingConditions ....................................................... 16Table2–SummaryofRoadwayAnalysis–ExistingConditions .............................................................. 17Table3–SummaryofProjectTripGeneration ......................................................................................... 20Table4–SummaryofIntersectionOperation–OpeningYear2018–ExistingPlusGrowth .................. 28Table5–SummaryofRoadwayAnalysis–OpeningYear2018–ExistingPlusGrowth ......................... 29Table6–SummaryofIntersectionOperation–OpeningYear2018–Existing+GrowthPlusProject .. 30Table7–SummaryofRoadwayAnalysis–OpeningYear2018–Existing+Growth+Project............... 32Table8–SummaryofCumulativeProjects ............................................................................................... 33Table9–SummaryofIntersectionOperation–OpeningYear2018CumulativeWithoutProject ......... 38Table10–SummaryofRoadwayAnalysis–OpeningYear2018CumulativeWithoutProject .............. 39Table11–SummaryofIntersectionOperation–OpeningYear2018CumulativePlusProject ............. 42Table12–SummaryofRoadwayAnalysis–OpeningYear2018CumulativePlusProject ..................... 43Table13–SummaryofIntersectionOperationswithImprovements–OpeningYear2018Cumulative

PlusProject ........................................................................................................................................ 45

RenaissanceEast -1- Kimley-HornandAssociates,Inc.TrafficImpactStudy August2017

TRAFFICIMPACTSTUDYFORTHEPROPOSED

RENAISSANCEEASTPROJECTINTHECITYOFRIALTO

I. INTRODUCTIONA. PurposeandObjectivesoftheStudy

This Traffic Impact Study has been prepared to address the traffic-related impacts of theproposedRenaissanceEastprojectintheCityofRialto.ThistrafficstudyhasbeenconductedinaccordancewiththetrafficstudyrequirementsoftheCityofRialto,basedon theCity’sTraffic ImpactAnalysisReportGuidelinesandRequirements(Date:December2013),and inaccordancewithSanBernardinoAssociationofGovernments(SANBAG)CongestionManagementProgram(CMP)requirements.Thisstudyaddressesexistingandshort-termfuturetrafficconditions,taking intoaccounttheproject trips to be generated by the project and potential project-related impacts on thesurroundingcirculationsystem.Thisreportincludesadescriptionofexistingtrafficconditionsinthesurroundingarea,estimatedproject trip generation anddistribution, future traffic growth, and an assessmentofproject-related impactson the roadwaysystem. Wherenecessary, circulationsystem improvementshavebeenidentifiedtoachieveacceptableintersectionoperationinthevicinityoftheproject.Theprojectwillbeevaluatedforthefollowingconditions:· ExistingConditions· OpeningYear2018–ExistingPlusGrowth· OpeningYear2018–ExistingPlusGrowthPlusProject· OpeningYear2018Cumulative–WithoutProject· OpeningYear2018Cumulative–WithProjectB. SitePlanLocationandStudyAreaTheprojectislocatedinthenorth-westernareaoftheCityofRialto,andisshowninitsregionalsettingonavicinitymaponFigure1.Theprojectsite(approximately7.7acres)isboundedbytheStateRoute210(SR-210)eastboundon-ramptothenorth,RenaissanceParkwaytothesouth,residentialusestotheeast,andAyalaDrivetothewest.TheprojectsiteislocatedwithintheRenaissanceSpecificPlanarea.

N Ayala D

r

N Linden Ave

Alder Ave

Sierra Ave

Citrus Ave

N C

edar Ave

N R

iverside Ave

N Pepper Ave

Historic U.S. 66

Baseline Rd

Merrill Ave

Randall Ave

Foothill Fwy

Arrow Blvd

San Bernardino Ave

Highland Ave

Locust Ave

Foothill Blvd

Linden Ave

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Renaissance Pkwy Easton St

Historic Route 66

- 2 -

PROJECTSITE


C. DevelopmentProjectIdentification

Pending

D. DevelopmentProjectDescriptionTheprojectwill involve theconstructionofa108-roomhotelon theeastendof thesite, twobuildings for retailuse totaling9,100square feet, two fast-food restaurantbuildings totaling7,620squarefeet,anda9,170-square-footrestaurantbuildingonthewestendofthesite.AcopyoftheprojectsiteplanisprovidedonFigure2.VehicularaccessprovisionsfortheprojectsitewouldconsistofthreedrivewaysonRenaissanceParkway. All three driveways on Renaissance Parkway would restrict left turns out of thedriveway.Allentrancestothesitewouldbeunsignalized.Aspartoftheproject,theeastlegattheintersectionofAyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkwaywillbere-constructedtoincludetwoleft-turnlanes,twothroughlanes,andonededicatedright-turnlane.Inaddition,theroadwaysegmentofRenaissanceParkwayfromAyalaDrivetotheproject’seasternboundarywillbewidenedtofourlanes.Theseimprovementswillbeconstructedbeforetheprojectsiteisconstructed.TheproposedopeningyearfortheprojectisYear2018.Theprojectwillbedevelopedinasingleprojectphase.Theprojectsiteislocatedapproximately1½-milesfromtheCityofRialto’sborderwiththeCityofFontana.The site is locatedwithin theRenaissance Specific Plan,which is located generally betweenCasmaliaStreetonthenorth,BaselineRoadonthesouth,AyalaDriveontheeast,andTamarindandPalmettoAvenuesonthewest.TheRenaissanceSpecificPlanareacovers1,445acres,with81separatePlanningAreas,and isapproved for avarietyof landuses, including residential,commercial,industrial,andemploymentuses.TheSpecificPlanwasapprovedforbuild-outinthreeseparatephases,overa20-yearperiod.TheRenaissanceSpecificPlanevaluatedarangeoflandusedensitiesandcorrespondingtripsgeneratedbytheimplementationofdesignatedlanduseswithintheSpecificPlanboundariesthroughbuild-out.AnamendmenttotheSpecificPlanwasapprovedinDecember,2016.TheRenaissanceSpecificPlanAmendment(RSPA)includesanumberofchangesto,amongotherthings,theVehicularCirculationPlanandtheTruckRoutePlan.TheRenaissanceEastprojectsiteislocatedwithinPlanningArea29oftheRenaissanceSpecificPlan. The land use designation is Freeway Incubator. The specific floor-to-area-ratio (FAR)assignedtoPlanningArea29was0.25.Theproposedcommercialusesareeitherapermitteduseorneedaconditionaldevelopmentpermitwithinthislandusecategory,andtheproposedFARis0.24.


E. AnalysisMethodology1. IntersectionAnalysis–HCMMethodologyPeakhour intersectionoperationsatsignalizedandunsignalizedintersectionswereevaluatedusingthemethodsprescribedintheHighwayCapacityManual(HCM)2010,consistentwiththerequirementsoftheCityofRialtoandtheSanBernardinoCountyCMP.TheCityofRialtoguidelinesrequireanalysisoftrafficoperationstobebasedonthevehiculardelaymethodologiesoftheHCM(TransportationResearchBoardSpecialReport209).TheCitydoesnotdesignateaspecificsoftware tobeused in theanalysis,butallows theuseofoneofseveralsoftwarepackages thatareconsistentwith theHCMmethodologies. The intersectionanalysisfortheproposedprojecthasbeenaccomplishedusingtheVistrosoftwareprogramandusing the specified input parameters outlined in the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis ReportGuidelinesandRequirements.PertheHCMMethodology,LevelofService(LOS)forsignalizedintersectionsisdefinedintermsofaveragevehicledelay,whichprovidesanindicationofdriverdiscomfort,frustration,andfuelconsumption. Specifically, LOS criteria are stated in terms of the average control delay pervehicle for thepeak 15-minuteperiodwithin thehour analyzed. The average controldelayincludesinitialdecelerationdelay,queuemove-uptime,andfinalaccelerationtimeinadditiontothe stop delay. The tables on the following page provide a description of the operatingcharacteristicsofeachLevelofServiceanddefinetheLOSintermsofaveragesecondsofdelayforsignalizedandunsignalizedintersections.2. LevelofServiceStandardsandMeasureofSignificanceTheCityofRialto,pertheCityofRialto2010GeneralPlanUpdate,establishesminimumLevelofServicestandards. AccordingtoPolicy4-1.20oftheGeneralPlandocument,theCityrequiresthatsignalized intersectionsoperateatLOSDorbetterduringthemorningandeveningpeakhours. TheCity’sTrafficStudyGuidelinesrequirenewdevelopment tomitigate impacts thatcausetheLevelofServicetofallbelowLOSD,orthepeakhourdelaytoincreaseasfollows:

- LOSA/B–by10.0seconds- LOSC –by8.0seconds- LOSD –by5.0seconds- LOSE –by2.0seconds- LOSF –by1.0second

TheCity’strafficstudyguidelinesrequireunsignalizedintersectionstooperatewithnovehicularmovementhavinganaveragedelayexceeding120secondsduringthemorningandeveningpeakhours.


LEVELOFSERVICEDEFINITIONS

LevelofService Description

ANoapproachphaseisfullyutilizedbytrafficandnovehiclewaitslongerthanoneredindication.Typically,theapproachappearsquiteopen,turnsaremadeeasilyandnearlyalldriversfindfreedomofoperation.

BThisservicelevelrepresentsstableoperation,whereanoccasionalapproachphaseisfullyutilizedandasubstantialnumberareapproachingfulluse.Manydriversbegintofeelrestrictedwithinplatoonsofvehicles.

CThislevelstillrepresentsstableoperatingconditions.Occasionallydriversmayhavetowaitthroughmorethanoneredsignalindication,andbackupsmaydevelopbehindturningvehicles.Mostdriversfeelsomewhatrestrictedbutnotobjectionablyso.

D

Thislevelencompassesazoneofincreasingrestriction,approachinginstabilityattheintersection.Delaystoapproachingvehiclesmaybesubstantialduringshortpeakswithinthepeakperiod;however,enoughcycleswithlowerdemandoccurtopermitperiodicclearanceofdevelopingqueues,thuspreventingexcessivebackups.

ECapacityoccursattheupperendofthisservicelevel.Itrepresentsthemostvehiclesthatanyparticularintersectionapproachcanaccommodate.Fullutilizationofeverysignalcycleisseldomattainednomatterhowgreatthedemand.

F

Thisleveldescribesforcedflowoperationsatlowspeeds,wherevolumesexceedcapacity.Theseconditionsusuallyresultfromqueuesofvehiclesbackingupfromarestrictiondownstream.Speedsarereducedsubstantiallyandstoppagesmayoccurforshortorlongperiodsoftimeduetothecongestion.Intheextremecase,bothspeedandvolumecandroptozero.

LEVELOFSERVICECRITERIAFORSIGNALIZEDANDUNSIGNALIZEDINTERSECTIONS

LevelofService

SignalizedIntersection(Averagedelaypervehicle,

inseconds)1

UnsignalizedIntersections(Averagedelaypervehicle,

inseconds)2

A <10 0–10

B >10–20 >10–15

C >20–35 >15–25

D >35–55 >25–35

E >55–80 >35–50

F >80 >50 1Source:HighwayCapacityManual(HCM2010),Exhibit18-4.

2Source:HighwayCapacityManual(HCM2010),Exhibits19-1and20-2.


RoadwaySegmentAnalysisTheroadwaysegmentanalysiswilladdresstheproject’simpactondailyoperatingconditionsonroadwaysegmentswithintheprojectvicinity.Roadwaysegmentsareevaluatedbycomparingthetrafficvolumeonaroadwaysegmenttothedailycapacityofthatsegment,todeterminethevolume-to-capacity(v/c)ratio.Dailycapacityisbasedontheroadwayclassification,asshowninthefollowingchart:

CITYOFRIALTOROADWAYCAPACITY(1)

RoadwayClassification No.ofLanesTwo-WayTrafficVolume(ADT)(2)

ServiceLevelC ServiceLevelD ServiceLevelE

Local 2 2,500-2,799 2,800-3,099 3,100+

Collector(60'or64') 2 9,900-11,199 11,200-12,499 12,500+

Industrial(45') 2 9,900-11,199 11,200-12,499 12,500+

Arterial(3) 2 14,400-16,199 16,200-17,999 18,000+

SecondaryHighway 4 16,900-19,399 19,400-21,999 22,000+

ModifiedArterial(100') 4 26,200-29,599 29,600-32,999 33,000+

Arterial(120') 6 38,700-44,099 44,100-49,499 49,500+

Notes:(1) Allcapacityfiguresarebasedonoptimumconditionsandareintendedasguidelines

forplanningpurposesonly(2) Maximum two-wayADT values arebased on the1999ModifiedHighwayCapacity

ManualLevelofServiceTables.(3) Two-laneroadsdesignatedasfuturearterialsthatconformtoarterialdesignstandards

forverticalandhorizontalalignmentsareanalyzedasarterials.Source:CityofRialtoTrafficImpactAnalysisReportGuidelinesandRequirements(2013)


II. AREACONDITIONSA. Identify Study Area and IntersectionsThis trafficstudy includesdocumentationofexistingconditions,analysisofcumulative trafficconditions,andidentificationofproject-relatedimpactsatthefollowingstudyintersections:ExistingIntersections:

1. AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway2. LocustAvenueatRenaissanceParkway3. LindenAvenueatRenaissanceParkway4. AyalaDriveatSR-210WestboundRamps5. AyalaDriveatSR-210EastboundRamps6. AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway7. AyalaDriveatBaselineRoad8. CactusAvenueatRenaissanceParkway

FutureDrivewayIntersections:

D1.RenaissanceParkwayatWestDrivewayD2.RenaissanceParkwayatMiddleDrivewayD3.RenaissanceParkwayatEastDriveway

Inaddition,thefollowingroadwaysegmentswereanalyzed:

· RenaissanceParkway:AyalaDrivetoCactusAvenue

The study locations were established in conjunction with City staff through the ScopingAgreementprocess(ExhibitBoftheCityofRialtoTrafficImpactAnalysisReportGuidelinesandRequirements).AcopyoftheapprovedScopingAgreementisprovidedinAppendixA.


B. DescriptionofExistingRoads,TrafficControlsandIntersectionGeometricsRegionalaccesstothesiteisprovidedprimarilybytheStateRoute210(SR-210)Freeway,justnorthoftheprojectsite.Inaddition,theI-215Freewayislocatedapproximately4.5milestotheeastofthesite;theI-15Freewayisapproximately6milestothewestofthesite,andaccesstotheI-10Freewayisapproximately4.5milestothesouth.Existing laneconfigurationsand intersectioncontrolsatthestudy intersectionsareshownonFigure3.Thefollowingprovidesadescriptionoftheroadwayssurroundingtheprojectsite.AlderAvenue–AlderAvenue iscurrently a four-lanedividedroadway. It isoriented in thenorth-southdirectionandprovidesaccesstotheSR-210Freeway.AlderAvenueisdesignatedasaMajorArterialintheGeneralPlan,withfourtravellanes,abikelaneineachdirection,araisedcentermedian,andsidewalkswithin100feetofright-of-way.AlderAvenueisadesignatedtruckrouteintheCity.LocustAvenue–LocustAvenueiscurrentlyatwo-tofour-laneroadway,orientedinthenorth-southdirection.Within theRenaissance SpecificPlan area,LocustAvenue isdesignated as aSecondaryArterial,whichwouldprovidefourtravellanes,parking/bikelanes,andsidewalkswithin84feetofright-of-way.LocustAvenueisdesignatedasatruckrouteintheCity.LindenAvenue–LindenAvenueiscurrentlyafour-laneroadwaynearthestudyarea,orientedin thenorth-southdirection andonly currentlybuiltnorthofRenaissanceParkway. LindenAvenueisdesignatedasaSecondaryArterial,andwouldprovidetwotravellanes,abikelane,andsidewalk ineachdirectionwithin80 feetofright-of-way. LindenAvenue isadesignatedtruckrouteonlywithintheRenaissanceSpecificPlanArea,withtruckaccessrestrictedtolocaldeliveriesbetweenRenaissanceParkwayandBaselineRoad.AyalaDrive–AyalaDriveiscurrentlyatwo-tofour-lanedividedroadway,whichbordersthewesternprojectfrontage.Itisorientedinthenorth-southdirectionandprovidesaccesstotheSR-210Freeway.AyalaDriveisdesignatedasaSecondaryArterial,withfourtravellanes,bikelanesineachdirection,apaintedorraisedcentermedian,andsidewalkswithin100feetofright-of-way.ThestandardstreetsectionforAyalaDriveintheRenaissanceSpecificPlanAmendmentisshownonFigure4.AyalaDriveisdesignatedasatruckrouteintheCity.

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 10 -

1. Alder Aveat Renaissance Pkwy

4. Ayala Drat SR-210 WB Ramps

6. Ayala Drat Renaissance Pkwy

7. Ayala Drat Baseline Rd

5. Ayala Drat SR-210 EB Ramps

LEGEND:

2. Locust Aveat Renaissance Pkwy

8. Cactus Aveat Easton St

3. Linden Aveat Renaissance Pkwy

PROJECTSITE

- 11 -


RenaissanceParkway–RenaissanceParkwayiscurrentlyafour-laneundividedroadwaywestofAyalaDrive,with left-turn lanes at arterial intersections.EastofAyalaDrive,RenaissanceParkwaytransitionstoatwo-laneundividedroadway.RenaissanceParkwayextendsinaneast-westorientationthroughandbeyondtheboundariesoftheCityofRialto,changingtoHighlandAvenuetothewestandEastonStreettotheeast.RenaissanceParkwayconnectswithseveralnorth-southstreetsthathaveinterchangeswiththeSR-210Freewaytothenorth,andtheI-10Freeway to the south.Renaissance Parkway is designated as aMajorArterial,whichwouldprovidefourtravellaneswithbikelanesandaraisedmedianwithin108feetofright-of-way.ThestandardstreetsectionforRenaissanceParkwayintheRenaissanceSpecificPlanAmendmentisshownonFigure5.RenaissanceParkwayisatruckroutethroughtheRenaissanceSpecificPlanarea,withtruckaccessrestrictedtolocaldeliveriesbetweenLocustAvenueandAyalaDrive.BaselineRoad–BaselineRoadiscurrentlyatwo-tofour-laneroadwaythroughthestudyarea,withleft-turnlanesatarterialintersections.BaselineRoadisdesignatedasaMajorArterialinthe Renaissance Specific Plan,whichwould provide four travel lanes and sidewalk in eachdirectionwithin100 feetofright-of-way.Theultimateconfigurationwillalsoaccommodatearaisedmedian.BaselineRoadisadesignatedtruckrouteintheCity.C. ExistingTrafficVolumesExistingPeakHourTurningMovementVolumesForeachexistingintersectionexceptCactusAvenueatEastonStreet,morningandeveningpeakhourturningmovementvolumeswerecollectedinNovember2016.TheintersectionofCactusAvenue and Easton Street had data collected in July 2017. Copies of the traffic count dataworksheetsareprovidedinAppendixB.

Intersectioncountdataincludedvehicleclassificationsforpassengervehiclesandtrucks.Vehicleclassifications arenecessary to computePassengerCarEquivalent (PCE)volumes,which areusedinthetrafficanalysistoaddresstheimpactsoftrucktrafficonintersectionandroadwayoperation.ThePCEvolumesweredevelopedbyapplyingaPCEfactorof1.5for2-axletrucks,2.0for3-axletrucks,and3.0fortruckswith4ormoreaxles.ThesefactorsareconsistentwiththeCityofRialto’sTrafficImpactAnalysisGuidelinesandRequirements.PCEvolumeworksheetsareprovidedinAppendixC.ExistingmorningandeveningpeakhourvolumeswiththePCEfactorsappliedarepresentedonFigure6.ExistingRoadwayDailyVolumesExistingdailyroadwayvolumesonRenaissanceParkwayeastofAyalaDriveandwestof theresidentialstreetconnectionswascollectedinJuly2017andincludedvehicleclassification

- 13 -

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 14 -

LEGEND:









PROJECTSITE


information.Liketheintersectionvolumes,PCEfactorswereappliedtothetruckvolumes.TheresultingexistingdailytrafficvolumeswithPCEareshownonFigure6.DailytrafficcountdatacollectionworksheetsareprovidedinAppendixB.ComparisonofExistingRoadwayDailyVolumeAtthetimeoftheJuly2017trafficcounts,constructionwasoccurringonRenaissanceParkwaywestofAyalaDrive.TodetermineifthecountdataeastofAyalaDrivecollectedseemstobeavalidrepresentationofexistingvolumesinthearea,thedailyvolumewascomparedtoapreviouscountcollectedonthesameroadwaysegment.ThisJuly2017countwascomparedtothecountcollectedin2015aspartofthetrafficanalysisfortheRenaissanceSpecificPlanAmendment(RSPA).Theexistingdailyvolumeforthisstudywascalculatedtobe6,042;thetrafficstudyfortheRSPAusedanexistingdailyvolumeof5,840.VolumesdonotseemtobesignificantlyaffectedbytheconstructionwestofAyalaDrive.Assuch,thevolumescollectedinJuly2017wereusedwithoutadjustments.D. ExistingDelayandLevelofServicePeak Hour Operating ConditionsIntersectionLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedforthemorningandeveningpeakhoursusingtheanalysisproceduresandassumptionsdescribedpreviouslyinthisreport.Theresultsof the intersectionanalysis forExistingConditionsareshownonTable1. CopiesofExistingConditionsintersectionanalysisworksheetsareprovidedinAppendixD.ReviewofthistableindicatesthatallstudyintersectionsarecurrentlyoperatingatanacceptableLevelofService.Daily Roadway Operating ConditionsRoadwayLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedbasedon theroadwaycapacitiespresentedpreviouslyinthisreport.TheresultsoftheroadwayanalysisforExistingConditionsareshownonTable2.ReviewofthistableindicatesthatthestudyroadwaysegmentiscurrentlyoperatingwithinitscurrentLevelofServiceDcapacity.E. GeneralPlanCirculationElement

The General Plan Circulation Element references the Renaissance Specific Plan for roadwaydesignationsfortheprojectsiteandthesurroundingvicinity.TheoriginalRenaissanceSpecificPlanwasapprovedin2010.Anamendmenttothespecificplan–theRenaissanceSpecificPlanAmendment(RSPA)wasapproved inDecember,2016. AcopyoftheRSPACirculationPlan isprovidedonFigure7.

TABLE1SUMMARYOFINTERSECTIONOPERATION

EXISTINGCONDITIONS

TrafficControl Delay LOS Delay LOS

1 AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 32.7 C 32.6 C2 LocustAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 34.5 C 32.0 C3 LindenAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 16.4 B 12.4 B4 AyalaDriveatSR-210WestboundRamps S 15.9 B 10.9 B5 AyalaDriveatSR-210EastboundRamps S 11.1 B 12.5 B6 AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway S 30.9 C 30.4 C7 AyalaDriveatBaselineRoad S 17.6 B 19.0 B8 CactusAvenueatEastonStreet U 9.6 A 10.2 B

AMPeakHour PMPeakHour

Notes:-BoldandshadedvaluesindicateintersectionsoperatingatLOSEorForsignificantimpacttointersectionperCitystandards.-Atasignalizedintersection,delayreferstotheaveragecontroldelayfortheentireintersection,measuredinsecondspervehicle.-Atatwo-waystop-controlledintersection,delayreferstotheaveragevehicledelayontheworstmovement.-Delayvaluesarebasedonthemethodologyoutlinedinthe2010HighwayCapacityManual.S=SignalizedU=Unsignalized

IntersectionInt.#

RenaissanceEastTrafficImpactStudy

-16- Kimley-HornandAssociates,Inc.

RenaissanceParkway AyalaDrivetoCactusAvenue 12,499 6,402 Yes

Notes:LOS=LevelofServiceADT=AverageDailyTrafficPCE=PassengerCarEquivalent

TABLE2SUMMARYOFROADWAYANALYSIS

EXISTINGCONDITIONS

LOSDCapacity

LOSDorBetter?SegmentRoadway

ExistingADT

w/PCE



- 18 -


F. TransitService

Transitservice to theprojectarea isprovidedvia theOmniTrans transit lines,whichserveanumberofSanBernardinocitiesinthearea.BusstopsintheprojectvicinityarelocatedalongBohnertAvenuetothenorthandBaselineRoadtothesouth. Adescriptionofthebusroutesservingtheprojectareaisprovidedbelow.OmniTransRoute10operatesbetween theCityofFontanaand theCityofSanBernardino,traveling through Rialto along Baseline Road in the project vicinity. Route 10 operates onweekdaysfrom5:10AMto8:15PMwithapproximately30-minuteto1-hourheadways(thetimeintervalbetweenbusarrivals),onSaturdaysfrom6:20AMto7:00PMwithapproximately1-hourheadways,andonSundaysfrom7:20AMto6:00PMwithapproximately1-hourheadways.OmniTransRoute22operatesbetweentheCityofRialtoandtheCityofColtonthroughBohnertAvenueintheprojectvicinity.Route22operatesonweekdaysfrom5:00AMto9:40PMwithapproximately30-minuteheadways,onSaturdaysfrom7:35AMto6:20PMwithapproximately1-hour headways, and on Sundays from 6:35 AM to 7:20 PM with approximately 1-hourheadways.Route22hasatransferpointwithRoute10attheintersectionofRiversideAvenueandBaselineRoad.

III. PROJECTEDFUTURETRAFFICA. ProjectTraffic1. ProjectTripGenerationTripgenerationestimatesfortheRenaissanceEastprojectarebasedondailyandpeakhourlytrip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) TripGenerationManual(9thEdition).ITEtripgenerationestimatesfortheprojectarebasedontripgenerationratesforfollowingITELandUses:Hotel(LandUse310),SpecialtyRetailCenter(LandUse 826),High-TurnoverRestaurant (LandUse 932), and Fast-FoodRestaurantwithDrive-Through(LandUse934).Notalltripsfromtheprojectareanticipatedtobenew.Sometripsareexpectedtobecapturedbytheinternallanduses,orfromtheexistingflowoftrafficpassingthesite.An8%reductionfactorwasappliedtotheHotellandusetoaccountforinternalcapturetotheneighboringretailandrestaurantusesontheprojectsite.A10%reductionfactorwasappliedtotheSpecialtyRetailandFast-FoodRestaurant landusestorepresentpass-bytrips. Thesereductions innewtripswere implemented incoordinationwith input fromCitystaff.Daily,morningpeakhour, andevening peak hour trip generation estimates are summarized on Table 3. The project isestimatedtogenerate5,742dailynewtrips,with464trips(245inboundand219outbound)inthemorningpeakhourand395trips(210inboundand185outbound)intheeveningpeakhour.

TABLE3SUMMARYOFPROJECTTRIPGENERATION

AYALASHOPPINGCENTER

TripGenerationRates1

ITE AMPeakHour PMPeakHour

LandUse Code Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total

Hotel 310 Room 8.170 0.313 0.217 0.530 0.306 0.294 0.600

SpecialtyRetailCenter 826 KSF 44.320 * * * 1.192 1.518 2.710

High-Turnover(Sit-Down)Restaurant 932 KSF 127.150 5.946 4.865 10.810 5.910 3.940 9.850

Fast-FoodRestaurantw/Drive-Through 934 KSF 496.120 23.164 22.256 45.420 16.978 15.672 32.650

TripGenerationEstimates


LandUse Quantity Unit Daily In Out Total In Out Total

Hotel 108 Room 882 34 23 57 33 32 65

SpecialtyRetailCenter 9.100 KSF 403 - - - 11 14 25

High-Turnover(Sit-Down)Restaurant 9.170 KSF 1,166 55 45 100 54 36 90

Fast-FoodRestaurantw/Drive-Through 7.620 KSF 3,780 177 170 347 129 119 248

TotalBeforeInternalCaptureandPass-byReductions 6,231 266 238 504 227 201 428

InternalCaptureforHotel(8%)2 71 3 2 5 3 3 6

Pass-ByReductionforRetail(10%forDailyandPM)3 40 0 0 0 1 1 2

Pass-ByReductionforFast-FoodRestaurant(10%)3 378 18 17 35 13 12 25

TotalNetProjectTrips 5,742 245 219 464 210 185 395

1Source:InstituteofTransportationEngineerspublication:TripGenerationManual,9thEdition2Source:InternalCaptureWorksheets(basedonInstituteofTransportationEngineersTripGenerationManual,

9thEdition,Vol.1:User'sGuideandHandbook)3BasedonconsultationwithCitystaff,a10%pass-byreductionfactorwasappliedtoapplicablelanduses.




2. TripDistributionandAssignmentTripdistributionassumptionsfortheprojectweredevelopedtakingintoaccounttheproposedsiteuses,andthesurroundingroadwaysystem.ProjecttripdistributionpatternsareshownonFigure8.Tripdistributionpercentagesateachstudyintersectionwereappliedtotheprojecttripgeneration to determine the project trips through each intersection. The resulting project-relatedpeakhourtripsatthestudyintersectionsareshownonFigure9.B. ExistingPlusGrowthPlusProjectTraffic(OpeningYear2018)

TheprojectOpeningYear is anticipated tobeYear2018. ByYear 2018, local roadway andintersectionimprovementscurrentlyunderwayorconditionedonotherprojectsareexpectedtobecompleted.FortheOpeningYear2018analysisscenarios,thefollowinglocalroadwayandintersectionimprovementsareassumedtobeinplace:

· WideningofLocustAvenuetofourlanesfromMiroWaytoRenaissanceParkway.TheprojectisexpectedtobecompletedbyOpeningYear2018.

· Construction of the south leg at the intersection of Linden Avenue at RenaissanceParkway,andreconfigurationof the lanes toaccommodatemovements fora4-leggedintersection.

· Re-constructionofthewestlegattheintersectionofAyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkwayto include two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane.ConstructionisunderwayandisexpectedtobecompletedbyOpeningYear2018.

· WideningofAyalaDrivetofourlanesfromBaselineRoadtoRenaissanceParkway.The

constructionofthisimprovementprojecthasbeenawarded,andtheprojectisexpectedtobecompletedbyOpeningYear2018.

· Note:Aspartoftheproject,theeastlegattheintersectionofAyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkwaywillbere-constructedtoincludetwoleft-turnlanes,twothroughlanes,andonededicated right-turn lane. In addition, the roadway segment ofRenaissance ParkwayfromAyalaDrivetotheproject’seasternboundarywillbewidenedtofourlanesandthentransitionedtotwolanesbeforetheboxculvertontheeasternedgeofthepropertytomatchtheexistingroadway.TheseimprovementswillbeimplementedinthePlusProjectscenarios.

Opening Year 2018 lane configurations and intersection controls with the addition of theimprovementsmentionedaboveatthestudyintersectionsareshownonFigure10.

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 22 -

PROJECTSITE

LEGEND:

= Distribution Percentage

= Study Intersection

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Renaissance

Miro Way Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

Baseline Rd

Walnut Ave

Casmalia St

Cactus Ave

- 23 -









D1. RenaissanceWest Driveway

D2. RenaissanceMiddle Driveway

D3. RenaissanceEast Driveway

LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 24 -









*

*

*

*

*

LEGEND:

*

PROJECTSITE

**

**

****


1. AmbientGrowthRate

BasedonconsultationwithCitystaff,anambientgrowthrateof2.0%peryeartoOpeningYear2018wasappliedtoexistingpeakhourtrafficvolumestodevelopExistingPlusGrowthforecasts.TheresultingdailyandpeakhourExistingPlusGrowthwithouttheproject(OpeningYear2018)trafficvolumesareshownonFigure11.ProjecttrafficwasthenaddedtodevelopExistingPlusGrowthPlusProject (OpeningYear2018) traffic forecasts.ExistingPlusGrowthPlusProjectvolumesareshownonFigure12.2. OpeningYear2018ExistingPlusGrowthPeak Hour Operating ConditionsIntersectionLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedforthemorningandeveningpeakhoursforExistingPlusGrowthwithouttheproject(OpeningYear2018).TheresultsareshownonTable4.IntersectionanalysisworksheetsforthisscenarioareprovidedinAppendixD.Review of this table indicates that all study intersections would continue to operate at anacceptableLevelofService.Daily Roadway Operating ConditionsRoadwayLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedbasedon theroadwaycapacitiespresentedpreviouslyinthisreport.TheresultsoftheroadwayanalysisforExistingPlusGrowthconditionsareshownonTable5.ReviewofthistableindicatesthatthestudyroadwaysegmentwouldoperatewithinitsLOSDcapacitywiththeadditionofambientgrowthtraffic.3. OpeningYear2018ExistingPlusGrowthPlusProject

Peak Hour Operating ConditionsIntersectionLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedforthemorningandeveningpeakhoursfortheExistingPlusGrowthPlusProject condition. The resultsof the intersection analysis areshownonTable6.Review of this table indicates that all study intersections would continue to operate at anacceptableLevelofService.ThesignalizedintersectionofAyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkwaywouldoperateatLOSDinthemorningpeakhourwiththeadditionofprojecttraffic.Althoughthe forecastedLevelof Servicewouldbe acceptable, theproject impact (14.9 seconds in themorning) would be considered a significant impact based on the significance sliding scalepresentedonpage5ofthisreport.

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 26 -









LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Renaissance


Leiske Dr

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

Baseline Rd

Walnut Ave

Casmalia St

Cactus Ave

- 27 -












LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE


OPENINGYEAR2018-EXISTINGPLUSGROWTH


1 AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 32.6 C 32.4 C2 LocustAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 34.6 C 32.3 C3 LindenAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 17.5 B 13.4 B4 AyalaDriveatSR-210WestboundRamps S 16.9 B 11.0 B5 AyalaDriveatSR-210EastboundRamps S 11.3 B 12.9 B6 AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway S 22.3 C 17.8 B7 AyalaDriveatBaselineRoad S 18.1 B 19.6 B8 CactusAvenueatEastonStreet U 9.7 A 10.3 B

AMPeakHour PMPeakHourIntersectionInt.#




Roadway Segment LOSDCapacity

ExistingADT

w/PCE

ExistingPlus

GrowthADT

LOSDorBetter?

RenaissanceParkway AyalaDrivetoCactusAvenue 12,499 6,402 6,530 Yes

Notes:LOS=LevelofService

PCE=PassengerCarEquivalent


OPENINGYEAR2018-EXISTINGPLUSGROWTH

ADT=AverageDailyTraffic



Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS

1 AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 32.6 C 32.7 C 0.1 No 32.4 C 32.2 C -0.2 No

2 LocustAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 34.6 C 34.1 C -0.5 No 32.3 C 31.8 C -0.5 No

3 LindenAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 17.5 B 16.9 B -0.6 No 13.4 B 12.4 B -1.0 No

4 AyalaDriveatSR-210WestboundRamps S 16.9 B 19.0 B 2.1 No 11.0 B 11.6 B 0.6 No

5 AyalaDriveatSR-210EastboundRamps S 11.3 B 12.1 B 0.8 No 12.9 B 13.7 B 0.8 No

6 AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway S 22.3 C 37.2 D 14.9 Yes 17.8 B 24.7 C 6.9 No

7 AyalaDriveatBaselineRoad S 18.1 B 18.9 B 0.8 No 19.6 B 20.1 C 0.5 No

8 CactusAvenueatEastonStreet U 9.7 A 10.0 A 0.3 No 10.3 B 10.6 B 0.3 No

D1 RenaissanceParkwayWestDriveway U N/A - 11.0 B N/A - N/A - 10.9 B N/A -

D2 RenaissanceParkwayMiddleDriveway U N/A - 10.6 B N/A - N/A - 10.6 B N/A -

D3 RenaissanceParkwayEastDriveway U N/A - 9.9 A N/A - N/A - 10.0 A N/A -


OPENINGYEAR2018-EXISTINGPLUSGROWTHPLUSPROJECT

PMPeakHourAMPeakHour

ImpactSig?

WithoutProject WithProject ProjectImpact

ImpactSig?


Int.# Intersection TrafficControlWithoutProject WithProject Project

Impact




Daily Roadway Operating Conditions

AspartoftheprojectimprovementtowidenRenaissanceParkwaytofourlanesfromAyalaDrivetotheEastProjectBoundary,theroadwaysegmentofRenaissanceParkwayfromAyalaDrivetoCactus Avenue was separated into the following two roadway segments for Plus Projectscenarios:

· RenaissanceParkway:AyalaDrivetoEastProjectBoundary(4-laneArterialcapacity)· RenaissanceParkway:EastProjectBoundarytoCactusAvenue(2-laneArterialcapacity)

RoadwayLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedbasedonthedailyLOSDcapacitiespresentedpreviously in this report.The results of the roadway analysis forExisting PlusGrowth PlusProjectconditionsareshownonTable7.Review of this table indicates that both study roadway segmentswill operate within theirOpeningYear2018PlusProjectLevelofServiceDcapacitywiththeadditionofprojecttraffic.C. CumulativeConditions(ExistingPlusGrowthPlusCumulativeProjects)

1. CumulativeProjects

Inadditiontoambientgrowth,trafficvolumesforCumulativeProjects(approvedandpendingprojects)areaddedtotheExistingPlusGrowthtrafficvolumes.CumulativeProjectsconsistofanyprojectthathasbeenapprovedandisnotyetoccupied,andprojectsthatareinvariousstagesof the application and approval process, but have not yet been approved. A summary ofCumulative Projects in the project vicinity and the trip generation associated with each isprovidedonTable8.ThelocationsoftheCumulativeProjectsareshownonFigure13.2. BackgroundGrowthRateAsdiscussedearlier,anambientgrowthrateof2.0%peryeartoOpeningYear2018wasassumedforthisanalysis.

Roadway SegmentLOSD

CapacitywithProject

ExistingADT

w/PCE

ExistingPlus

GrowthADT

DailyProjectTraffic

Existing+Growth+

ProjectVolume

LOSDorBetter?

AyalaDrivetoEastProjectBoundary 32,999 6,402 6,530 5,742 12,272 Yes

EastProjectBoundarytoCactusAvenue 12,499 6,402 6,530 574 7,104 Yes

Notes:LOS=LevelofServiceADT=AverageDailyTrafficPCE=PassengerCarEquivalent


OPENINGYEAR2018-EXISTINGPLUSGROWTHPLUSPROJECT

RenaissanceParkway



TABLE8SUMMARYOFCUMULATIVEPROJECTS

TripGenerationEstimatesAMPeakHour PMPeakHour

Project# LandUse Quantity Units Daily In Out Total In Out Total

1 GoldenSprings 630 KSF 3,761 249 67 316 84 254 337

2 I-210LogisticsIII 742.514 KSF 4,430 295 79 374 99 299 398

3 CapRockII-Locust/Bohnert 609 KSF 2,782 189 49 238 64 190 254

SaterBros

Hotel 100 ROOMS 817 31 22 53 31 29 60

High-Turnover(Sit-Down)Restaurant 2.000 KSF 254 12 11 23 13 9 22

Pass-byHigh-Turn(Sit-Down)Restaurant -57 0 0 0 -2 -2 -4

Fast-FoodRestaurantw/oD.T. 1.000 KSF 716 26 18 44 13 13 26

Pass-byFast-FoodRestaurant -161 -6 -4 -10 -3 -3 -6

Fast-FoodRestaurantw/D.T. 5.440 KSF 2,699 126 121 247 92 85 177

Pass-byFast-FoodRestaurant -638 -31 -30 -61 -20 -20 -40

GasolineStationw/Conv.Mkt.&CarWash 16 VFP 2,445 97 93 190 113 109 222

Pass-byGasoline/ServiceStation -572 -21 -21 -42 -26 -26 -52

SiteInternalCapture(10%) -693 -29 -27 -56 -26 -25 -51

5 ShawDevelopmentWarehouse 175.900 KSF 1,050 70 18 88 23 70 93

LytleCreekSP(10%ofCapacity)

Single-FamilyDetachedHousing 504 DU 4,823 95 284 379 321 188 509

Condominium 336 DU 1,952 25 123 148 117 58 175

7 EmaarEnterpriseHomes 20.00 DU 191 4 11 15 13 7 20

8 B+BPlastics 150.27 KSF 963 64 17 81 22 64 86

9 PusanPipeManufacturing 39.000 KSF 149 22 6 28 10 18 28

RialtoWalmart

FreeStandingDiscountSuperstore 197.639 KSF 10,501 185 145 330 446 465 911

ShoppingCenter 13.712 KSF 589 8 5 13 25 26 51

High-Turnover(Sit-Down)Restaurant 12.856 KSF 1,635 77 71 148 85 59 144

Gasoline/ServiceStation 16 VFP 2,697 99 95 194 111 111 222

Pass-byGasoline/ServiceStation -1,019 -52 -50 -102 -42 -42 -84

Fast-FoodRestaurantw/D.T. 5.948 KSF 2,951 138 132 270 101 93 194

Pass-byFast-FoodRestaurant -1,328 -66 -63 -129 -48 -44 -92

InternalCapture(10%) -1,837 -51 -45 -96 -77 -75 -152

11 Prologis(LocustatStonehurst) 473.000 KSF 2,824 187 50 237 64 191 255

12 Prologis(TamarindatWalnut) 384.000 KSF 2,292 152 39 191 52 154 206

RenaissanceMarketplace(100%ofCapacity)

NorthSideArea 65.756 KSF 4,441 89 70 159 115 203 318

SouthSideArea 523.567 KSF 13,340 213 96 309 547 617 1,164

14 I-210LogisticsIV 412.560 KSF 2,462 105 28 133 35 106 141

15 I-210LogisticsV 203.639 KSF 1,197 79 22 101 27 81 108

16 MonsterEnergy 1,094.900 KSF 6,533 434 115 549 148 411 589

17 PA108Building5 614.848 KSF 4,252 364 55 419 292 370 662

18 PA108Building6 649.800 KSF 5,542 93 532 625 535 32 567

TotalProjectTrips 81,983 3,272 2,135 5,407 3,354 4,075 7,429

13

6

10

PROJECTTRIPGENERATION

DU=DwellingUnits,KSF=1,000squarefeet,VFP=VehicleFuelingPositions

4



N Ayala D

r

N Linden Ave

Alder Ave

Sierra Ave

N C

edar Ave

N R

iverside Ave

Historic U.S. 66

Baseline Rd

Merrill Ave

Randall Ave

Arrow Blvd

Valley Blvd

San Bernardino Ave

Renaissance Pkwy

Locust Ave

Maple Ave

Foothill Blvd

Linden Ave

Laurel Ave

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fontana

Rialto

Bloomington

Cimmeron

- 34 -

LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE


3. CumulativeProjectsTripGenerationTripgenerationinformationfortheCumulativeProjectswasderivedeitherfromapprovedtrafficstudies,where available; or developed by Kimley-Horn if approved traffic studieswere notavailable. Project information and trip generation assumptions for Cumulative Projects areprovidedinAppendixE.4. CumulativeProjectsTripDistributionandAssignmentLikewise,tripdistributionandassignmentfortheCumulativeProjectswereeitherderivedfromapprovedtrafficstudies,whereavailable;orweredevelopedbyKimley-Hornifapprovedtrafficstudieswerenotavailable.TripdistributionassumptionsforCumulativeProjectsareprovidedinAppendixE. Morning and eveningpeakhour turningmovementvolumes forCumulativeProjectTrafficareshownonFigure14.5. OpeningYear2018CumulativeWithoutProjectConditionsPeak Hour Operating ConditionsMorningandeveningpeakhourturningmovementvolumesforOpeningYear2018CumulativeWithoutProjectConditionsareshownonFigure15.IntersectionLevelofServiceanalysiswasconducted for themorning and eveningpeak hours, and the results are shown onTable9.Reviewofthistableindicatesthat,withtheadditionofCumulativeProjectstraffic,thefollowingintersectionswouldoperateatanunacceptableLevelofService:

· #6–AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway:PM–LOSECopiesofintersectionanalysisworksheetsforthisscenarioareprovidedinAppendixD.Daily Roadway Operating Conditions

RoadwayLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedbasedonthedailyLOSDcapacitiespresentedpreviouslyinthisreport.TheresultsoftheroadwayanalysisforOpeningYear2018CumulativewithoutProjectconditionsareshownonTable10.Reviewofthistable indicatesthatthestudyroadwaysegmentwilloperatewithin itsOpeningYear2018LevelofServiceDcapacitywiththeadditionofcumulativeprojecttraffic.

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 36 -









LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Baseline Rd

Renaissance

Casmalia St

Miro Way

Cactus Ave

Fitzgerald Ave

Leiske Dr

Walnut Ave

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

- 37 -









LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE


OPENINGYEAR2018CUMULATIVEWITHOUTPROJECT


1 AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 40.8 D 57.0 E2 LocustAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 32.2 C 32.6 C3 LindenAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 24.4 C 35.5 D4 AyalaDriveatSR-210WestboundRamps S 25.9 C 16.8 B5 AyalaDriveatSR-210EastboundRamps S 13.5 B 22.9 C6 AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway S 23.1 C 25.6 C7 AyalaDriveatBaselineRoad S 23.0 C 37.4 D8 CactusAvenueatEastonStreet S 12.8 B 16.1 B

Int.# IntersectionAMPeakHour PMPeakHour




Roadway Segment LOSDCapacityExistingPlusGrowthADT

CumulativeProjectsADT

OpeningYear+Cum.Projects

ADT

LOSDorBetter?

RenaissanceParkway AyalaDrivetoCactusAvenue 12,499 6,530 3,244 9,774 Yes

Notes:LOS=LevelofServiceADT=AverageDailyTraffic


OPENINGYEAR2018CUMULATIVEWITHOUTPROJECT




6. OpeningYear2018CumulativePlusProjectConditionsPeak Hour Operating ConditionsProjecttrafficwasaddedtoOpeningYear2018CumulativetrafficvolumestodevelopOpeningYear 2018 Cumulative plus Project traffic forecast volumes. The resulting peak hour trafficvolumesareshownonFigure16.IntersectionLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedforthemorningandeveningpeakhours,andtheresultsareshownonTable11.Asthistableindicates,thefollowingintersectionwouldoperateatanunacceptableLevelofService:

· #1–AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway:PM–LOSEThisintersectionisforecastedtooperateatanunacceptableLevelofServiceunderOpeningYearCumulativewithoutProjectconditions.Theprojectwouldnotincreasedelayatthisintersectionby2secondsormore,andthereforewouldnothaveasignificantprojectimpact.ImprovementsidentifiedaspartoftheRenaissanceSpecificPlantoreturntheintersectiontoLOSDorbetterareidentifiedlaterinthereport.Inaddition,thefollowingintersectionwouldoperateatLOSDorbetter,butwouldexperienceasignificantimpactduetotheprojectbasedonthesignificancecriteriaestablishedbythecityanddiscussedonPage5ofthisreport.

· #6–AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway:AM–LOSC,PM–LOSD

CopiesofintersectionanalysisworksheetsforthisscenarioareprovidedinAppendixD.InthisPlusProjectanalysis,eachofthesitedrivewaysisalsoanalyzed.TheresultsindicatethateachdrivewaywilloperateatLevelofServiceBorbetterduringbothpeakhours.Daily Roadway Operating Conditions

RoadwayLevelofServiceanalysiswasconductedbasedonthedailyLOSDcapacitiespresentedpreviouslyinthisreport.TheresultsoftheroadwayanalysisforOpeningYear2018CumulativePlusProjectconditionsareshownonTable12.Reviewofthistable indicatesthatthestudyroadwaysegmentwilloperatewithin itsOpeningYear2018LevelofServiceDcapacitywiththeadditionofprojecttraffic.

Ayala Dr

Linden Ave

Renaissance


Leiske Dr

Pkwy

Locust Ave

Laurel Ave

Maple Ave

Alder Ave

Baseline Rd

Walnut Ave

Casmalia St

Cactus Ave

- 41 -












LEGEND:

PROJECTSITE

Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS

1 AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 40.8 D 41.5 D 0.7 No 57.0 E 58.6 E 1.6 No

2 LocustAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 32.2 C 32.2 C 0.0 No 32.6 C 33.0 C 0.4 No

3 LindenAvenueatRenaissanceParkway S 24.4 C 25.0 C 0.6 No 35.5 D 36.5 D 1.0 No

4 AyalaDriveatSR-210WestboundRamps S 25.9 C 30.1 C 4.2 No 16.8 B 18.1 B 1.3 No

5 AyalaDriveatSR-210EastboundRamps S 13.5 B 15.9 B 2.4 No 22.9 C 28.1 C 5.2 No

6 AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway S 23.1 C 34.7 C 11.6 Yes 25.6 C 36.4 D 10.8 Yes

7 AyalaDriveatBaselineRoad S 23.0 C 24.6 C 1.6 No 37.4 D 41.1 D 3.7 No

8 CactusAvenueatEastonStreet U 12.8 B 13.4 B 0.6 No 16.1 C 16.9 C 0.8 No

D1 RenaissanceParkwayWestDriveway U N/A - 11.8 B N/A - N/A - 12.1 B N/A -

D2 RenaissanceParkwayMiddleDriveway U N/A - 11.4 B N/A - N/A - 11.8 B N/A -

D3 RenaissanceParkwayEastDriveway U N/A - 10.5 B N/A - N/A - 10.9 B N/A -


OPENINGYEAR2018CUMULATIVEPLUSPROJECT

Int.# Intersection TrafficControl

AMPeakHour PMPeakHourWithoutProject WithProject


ProjectImpact

ImpactSig?

WithoutProject WithProject ProjectImpact

ImpactSig?



Roadway SegmentLOSD

CapacitywithProject

OpeningYear+Cum.Projects

ADT

DailyProjectTraffic

OpeningYear+Cum.Project+

ProjectADT

LOSDorBetter?

AyalaDrivetoEastProjectBoundary 32,999 9,774 5,742 15,516 Yes

EastProjectBoundarytoCactusAvenue 12,499 9,774 574 10,348 Yes

Notes:LOS=LevelofServiceADT=AverageDailyTraffic



RenaissanceParkway




IV. MITIGATIONMEASURES

A. IntersectionImprovementsBased on the impact criteria in the City’s Traffic Impact Analysis Report Guidelines andRequirements(ExhibitF),noproject-relatedimpactswouldbeconsideredsignificant.ThefollowingintersectionswasfoundtooperateatunacceptableLOS:

· #1–AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway

ImplementationofthefollowingimprovementswouldrestoreoperationsatthislocationtoLOSDorbetterduringbothpeakperiods:#1–AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkway: Addasecondsouthbound left-turn lane.Addanexclusive westbound right-turn lane with overlap phases. These improvements to theintersection are consistent with the findings of the Renaissance Specific Plan. With theseimprovementsinplace,theintersectionwouldoperateatanacceptableLevelofServiceinthebothpeakhours.A summary of the intersection operation before and after implementation of thismitigationmeasureisprovidedonTable13.The project will contribute to this improvement through its fair share payment of theRenaissanceSpecificPlanTrafficFeeProgram.B. RoadwayImprovementsNotApplicable.C. SignificantImpacts–OtherImprovementsThefollowingintersectionswouldoperateatLevelofServiceC,buttheproject’simpactwouldbeconsideredtobesignificantonthebasisoftheslidingscale:

· #6–AyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkway:AM–LOSC,PM–LOSD

Note: TheprojectwillwidenRenaissanceParkway to4-laneswitharaisedmedianbetweenAyalaDriveand themiddledriveway,witha transition tomatch theexisting2-laneroadwayconfigurationneartheeasternboundaryoftheproject.Aspartofthismodification,theprojectwill re-configure thewestbound approach at the intersection ofAyalaDrive atRenaissanceParkway to include two left-turn lanes, two through lanes,andonededicatedright-turn lane.Theseimprovementsareassumedtoberequiredpriortoconstructionoftheprojectbuildings.Withtheseimprovements,theintersectionwouldcontinuetooperateatanacceptableLevelofService.Asaresult,nofurthermitigationwillbeneeded.

TABLE13SUMMARYOFINTERSECTIONOPERATIONSWITHPROPOSEDMITIGATIONMEASURES



Int.# Intersection Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS

AlderAvenueatRenaissanceParkwayAdd2ndSBLeft-TurnLane,andWBRight-TurnLane 41.5 D 37.2 D 58.6 E 42.2 D

Notes:-BoldandshadedvaluesindicateintersectionsoperatingatLOSEorForsignificantimpacttointersectionperCitystandards.-Atasignalizedintersection,delayreferstotheaveragecontroldelayfortheentireintersection,measuredinsecondspervehicle.-Atatwo-waystop-controlledintersection,delayreferstotheaveragevehicledelayontheworstmovement.-Delayvaluesarebasedonthemethodologyoutlinedinthe2010HighwayCapacityManual.

WithoutMitigation WithMitigation WithoutMitigation WithMitigation

1

AyalaShoppingCenterTrafficImpactStudy



V. FINDINGSANDRECOMMENDATIONSA. ImprovementsTheprojectwillwidenRenaissanceParkwayto4-laneswitharaisedmedian,transitioningtoconnectwiththeexisting2-lanesectionneartheeasternboundaryoftheprojectsite,andre-configurethewestboundapproachattheintersectionofAyalaDriveatRenaissanceParkwaytoinclude two left-turn lanes, two through lanes, and one dedicated right-turn lane prior toconstructionoftheproject.

B. TrafficSignalWarrantAnalysisEachproposedsitedrivewaywasanalyzed,andallareforecastedtooperateatLOSBorbetterinbothpeakhours.Thedrivewayswouldnotrequiresignalization.

C. SiteCirculationVehicularaccessprovisionsfortheprojectsitewouldconsistofthefollowing:

· ThreedrivewaysonRenaissanceParkway.· Thewestdrivewaywillbe35’wide.Themiddleandeastdrivewayswillbe30’

wide.· Allprojectdrivewaysrestrictleftturnsoutoftheprojectsite.· Allprojectdrivewayswillbeunsignalized.

The cumulative intersection analysis for the Plus Project condition indicates that all projectdrivewayswouldoperateatanacceptableLevelofServiceduringbothpeakhourperiods.


D. SafetyandOperationalImprovementsThesitedrivewaysandprojectimprovementsmustbedesignedsothatadequatesightdistancefordriversenteringandexiting thesite ismaintained.RenaissanceParkwayhasacompoundcurveacross theproject frontagesosightdistanceneeds tobeverifiedwith finalsitedesign.SpecifictotheEastdriveway,considerationneedstobegiventosightdistancelookingeastandpotentiallimitationsassociatedwiththeproposedretainingwall.Thelineofsight–astraightlinebetweenthedriver’seyeandoncomingvehiclesontheadjacentroadwaydefinestheLimitedUseArea. TheLimitedUseAreaforeachdrivewaymustbekeptclearofvisualobstructions,includingprojectsigns,buildingstructures,andlandscaping,inordertomaintainadequatesightdistance.Theproject’sWestdriveway is locatedapproximately300 feet from the intersectionofAyalaDriveandRenaissanceParkway.Duringthemorningpeak,westboundqueuesattheintersectionofAyalaDriveandRenaissanceParkwayareprojectedtoaverage315feet,potentiallyblockingthe driveway for vehicles inbound to the site. Queues in the afternoon peak hour are notanticipatedtoblockthedriveway.Duringthemorning,theproposedSonicisnotanticipatedtobeopenasSonicusestypicallyarenotopenuntil9:00a.m.,afterthemorningpeak.TheproposedCrackerBarrelwouldbeopenforbreakfastduringthemorningpeak.Itisanticipatedthatthevolumeoftrafficturningintothedriveway(98inonehour)wouldbeleftgapsinthequeuetoaccess thesite, findgaps in traffic to turn,oralternativelywoulduse theMiddledriveway toaccessthesite.A“KeepClear”pavementlegendonthewestboundlanesatthedrivewaymaybehelpfultoensurequeuesintheeastboundturnlaneareminimized.E. FairShareCalculationsNotApplicable.F. SpecificPlanSignalizationNotApplicable.G. GeneralPlanConformanceTheproposedRenaissanceEastprojectisinconformancewiththeRenaissanceSpecificPlanandthe City of Rialto General Plan. Neither a Specific Plan Amendment nor a General PlanAmendmentisrequiredfortheproject.H. RegionalFundingMechanismsThe project is located in the Renaissance Specific Plan area, and as such, is subject to theRenaissanceSpecificPlanTrafficFeeProgram,aswellastheCity’scity-widetrafficimpactfee


program. Theproject’spaymentof impact feesareused tooffset thecostsof implementingneededimprovementstointersectionsinfutureyearconditions.Inaddition,theprojectmayberequiredtoconstructaneededimprovementinadvanceoftheCity’sreceiptoffullfunding,inwhichcasetheimprovementmaybesubjecttoareimbursementagreement,toallowtheprojecttorecoupcostsfromfuturedevelopment.

APPENDIXA

APPROVEDSCOPINGAGREEMENT

APPENDIXB

TRAFFICCOUNTDATASHEETS

ITM Peak Hour SummaryPrepared by:

National Data & Surveying Services

Lanes 0.5 0.5 2 City:

AM 48 612 91 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 85 483 89 PM

AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes

118 0 81 0

172 0 54 2

1 99 0 60 31 0 20 1

2 104 0 120

0 40 0 25

Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM

AM 52 383 15 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 9 544 25 PM

1 2 0 Lanes

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM

AM NOON PM AM NOON PM

272 0 148 321 0 155

243 0 205 210 0 234AM NOON PM AM NOON PM

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM

Date:

210 0

700 AM

Peak Hour Summary

Southbound Approach Project #:11/17/2016

Renaissance Pkwy

445 PM

272 0 148

NAl

derA

veAM Peak Hour

Thursday

Wes

tbou

ndA

ppro

ach

RialtoDay:

EastboundA

pproach

N Alder Ave and Renaissance Pkwy , Rialto

PM Peak Hour

234

600

0

685

Signalized

CONTROL

Count Periods

AM

Start

4:00 PM

16-6173-003

NOON Peak Hour

NOON

PM

7:00 AM

NONE

9:00 AM

NONE

1351

0

6:00 PM

600

0

Total Volume Per Leg

0

West Leg

389

End

Total Ins & Outs

North Leg

683

0

528

Northbound Approach

South Leg

East Leg

450

0 0

685657

West Leg

South Leg

353515 0

East Leg

North Leg

1342

531

1133

0

1106578

751

528

683

0

Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:

National Data & Surveying ServicesDay:

Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 1 2 0 2 0.5 0.5 1 2 0 1 2 0

7:00 AM 29 103 5 17 147 12 14 25 4 8 68 37 4697:15 AM 17 95 5 39 170 11 25 36 25 8 63 36 5307:30 AM 2 80 2 20 138 13 34 32 7 9 18 21 3767:45 AM 4 105 3 15 157 12 26 11 4 6 23 24 3908:00 AM 1 83 7 10 92 6 8 11 1 6 17 22 2648:15 AM 3 95 6 8 75 5 15 11 1 5 22 28 2748:30 AM 0 85 3 18 86 7 12 9 2 7 7 23 2598:45 AM 3 97 1 15 77 9 11 7 3 4 18 21 266

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES : 59 743 32 142 942 75 145 142 47 53 236 212 2828 0 0 0 0APPROACH %'s : 7.07% 89.09% 3.84% 12.25% 81.28% 6.47% 43.41% 42.51% 14.07% 10.58% 47.11% 42.32%

nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb dPEAK HR START TIME : 700 AM TOTAL

PEAK HR VOL : 52 383 15 91 612 48 99 104 40 31 172 118 1765

PEAK HR FACTOR : 0.833

CONTROL :

N Alder Ave N Alder Ave

AM

Renaissance Pkwy

NORTHBOUND

Signalized

UTURNS

Renaissance Pkwy

0.710

WESTBOUND

0.853 0.7060.821

NS/EW Streets:

ThursdayProject ID:

City:

16-6173-003

Rialto

EASTBOUND

TOTALS11/17/2016

SOUTHBOUND



Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 1 2 0 2 0.5 0.5 1 2 0 1 2 0

4:00 PM 2 109 2 19 108 23 5 17 2 2 18 33 3404:15 PM 4 103 3 19 113 14 15 15 1 4 8 24 3234:30 PM 1 138 7 20 112 15 14 12 3 6 12 13 3534:45 PM 1 122 6 22 128 28 21 22 5 4 9 20 3885:00 PM 3 141 6 23 113 20 16 26 4 6 18 24 4005:15 PM 4 129 7 21 113 24 11 30 6 7 11 23 3865:30 PM 1 152 6 23 129 13 12 42 10 3 16 14 4215:45 PM 4 123 6 23 138 20 11 34 5 3 4 14 385


nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb dPEAK HR START TIME : 445 PM TOTAL

PEAK HR VOL : 9 544 25 89 483 85 60 120 25 20 54 81 1595


CONTROL :

Project ID: 16-6173-003

City: Rialto

UTURNS

11/17/2016

ThursdayTOTALS

Signalized

Renaissance PkwyNS/EW Streets: Renaissance Pkwy

PM

N Alder Ave N Alder Ave

0.8010.909 0.807

WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

0.923



Lanes 1 0 2 City:

AM 24 0 153 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 21 0 54 PM


103 0 24 0

139 0 89 2

1 17 0 30 0 0 0 0

2 118 0 178

0 0 0 0


AM 0 0 0 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 0 0 0 PM

0 0 0 Lanes

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM


163 0 110 242 0 113


AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM

Date:

271 0

700 AM

Peak Hour Summary


W Renaissance Pkwy

445 PM

163 0 110

NLi

nden

Ave

AM Peak Hour

Thursday

Wes

tbou

ndA

ppro

ach

RialtoDay:

EastboundA

pproach

N Linden Ave and W Renaissance Pkwy , Rialto

PM Peak Hour

232

120

0

54

Signalized

CONTROL

Count Periods

AM

Start

4:00 PM

16-6173-010

NOON Peak Hour

NOON

PM

7:00 AM

NONE

9:00 AM

NONE

297

0

6:00 PM

120

0


0

West Leg

345

End

Total Ins & Outs

North Leg

0

0

0

Northbound Approach

South Leg

East Leg

0

0 0

5475

West Leg

South Leg

318298 0

East Leg

North Leg

129

513

0

0

00

177

0

0

0



Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0




PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 153 0 24 17 118 0 0 139 103 554


CONTROL :

N Linden Ave N Linden Ave

AM

W Renaissance Pkwy

NORTHBOUND

Signalized

UTURNS

W Renaissance Pkwy

0.513

WESTBOUND

0.567 0.8230.000

NS/EW Streets:

ThursdayProject ID:

City:

16-6173-010

Rialto

EASTBOUND

TOTALS11/17/2016

SOUTHBOUND



Date:





PEAK HR VOL : 0 0 0 54 0 21 30 178 0 0 89 24 396


CONTROL :

Project ID: 16-6173-010

City: Rialto

UTURNS

11/17/2016

ThursdayTOTALS

Signalized

W Renaissance PkwyNS/EW Streets: W Renaissance Pkwy

PM

N Linden Ave N Linden Ave

0.9290.000 0.743


0.852



Lanes 0 2 0 City:

AM 373 454 0 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 132 291 0 PM


160 0 181 1.3

2 0 6 0.3

0 0 0 0 250 0 326 1.3

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0


AM 487 254 0 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 384 347 0 PM

2 2 0 Lanes

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM


862 0 522 412 0 513


AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM

Date:

0 0

700 AM

Peak Hour Summary


SR-210 WB Ramps

430 PM

862 0 522

NAy

ala

DrAM Peak Hour

Thursday

Wes

tbou

ndA

ppro

ach

RialtoDay:

EastboundA

pproach

N Ayala Dr and SR-210 WB Ramps , Rialto

PM Peak Hour

0

414

0

528

Signalized

CONTROL

Count Periods

AM

Start

4:00 PM

16-6173-014

NOON Peak Hour

NOON

PM

7:00 AM

NONE

9:00 AM

NONE

1241

0

6:00 PM

414

0


0

West Leg

513

End

Total Ins & Outs

North Leg

704

0

617

Northbound Approach

South Leg

East Leg

741

0 0

528423

West Leg

South Leg

522862 0

East Leg

North Leg

951

412

1445

0

1348731

827

617

704

0



Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3


NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES : 896 430 0 0 707 616 0 0 0 442 5 242 3338 0 0 0 0APPROACH %'s : 67.57% 32.43% 0.00% 0.00% 53.44% 46.56% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 64.15% 0.73% 35.12%


PEAK HR VOL : 487 254 0 0 454 373 0 0 0 250 2 160 1980


CONTROL :

N Ayala Dr N Ayala Dr

AM

SR-210 WB Ramps

NORTHBOUND

Signalized

UTURNS

SR-210 WB Ramps

0.780

WESTBOUND

0.789 0.0000.904

NS/EW Streets:

ThursdayProject ID:

City:

16-6173-014

Rialto

EASTBOUND

TOTALS11/17/2016

SOUTHBOUND



Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3


NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES : 756 707 0 0 533 264 0 0 0 614 10 347 3231 0 0 0 0APPROACH %'s : 51.67% 48.33% 0.00% 0.00% 66.88% 33.12% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 63.23% 1.03% 35.74%


PEAK HR VOL : 384 347 0 0 291 132 0 0 0 326 6 181 1667


CONTROL :

Project ID: 16-6173-014

City: Rialto

UTURNS

11/17/2016

ThursdayTOTALS

Signalized

SR-210 WB RampsNS/EW Streets: SR-210 WB Ramps

PM


0.0000.923 0.817


0.839



Lanes 0 2 2 City:

AM 0 447 258 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 0 424 173 PM


0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

1.3 95 0 224 0 0 0 0

0.3 4 0 8

1.3 299 0 487


AM 0 646 325 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 0 538 367 PM

0 2 1 Lanes

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM


0 0 0 0 0 0


AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM

Date:

587 0

700 AM

Peak Hour Summary


SR-210 EB Ramps

415 PM

0 0 0

NAy

ala

DrAM Peak Hour

Thursday

Wes

tbou

ndA

ppro

ach

RialtoDay:

EastboundA

pproach

N Ayala Dr and SR-210 EB Ramps , Rialto

PM Peak Hour

548

741

0

762

Signalized

CONTROL

Count Periods

AM

Start

4:00 PM

16-6173-015

NOON Peak Hour

NOON

PM

7:00 AM

NONE

9:00 AM

NONE

1446

0

6:00 PM

741

0


0

West Leg

548

End

Total Ins & Outs

North Leg

746

0

911

Northbound Approach

South Leg

East Leg

971

0 0

762597

West Leg

South Leg

719398 0

East Leg

North Leg

1359

587

1717

0

1816905

705

911

746

0



Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0 0 0


NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1145 630 395 759 0 185 7 554 0 0 0 3675 0 0 0 0APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 64.51% 35.49% 34.23% 65.77% 0.00% 24.80% 0.94% 74.26% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


PEAK HR VOL : 0 646 325 258 447 0 95 4 299 0 0 0 2074


CONTROL :


AM

SR-210 EB Ramps

NORTHBOUND

Signalized

UTURNS

SR-210 EB Ramps

0.000

WESTBOUND

0.780 0.9130.883

NS/EW Streets:

ThursdayProject ID:

City:

16-6173-015

Rialto

EASTBOUND

TOTALS11/17/2016

SOUTHBOUND



Date:

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES: 0 2 1 2 2 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0 0 0


NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES : 0 1043 686 316 835 0 423 9 982 0 0 0 4294 0 0 0 0APPROACH %'s : 0.00% 60.32% 39.68% 27.45% 72.55% 0.00% 29.92% 0.64% 69.45% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


PEAK HR VOL : 0 538 367 173 424 0 224 8 487 0 0 0 2221


CONTROL :

Project ID: 16-6173-015

City: Rialto

UTURNS

11/17/2016

ThursdayTOTALS

Signalized

SR-210 EB RampsNS/EW Streets: SR-210 EB Ramps

PM


0.9510.963 0.000


0.910



Lanes 1 2 1 City:

AM 71 542 134 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 54 637 219 PM


307 0 188 0

97 0 46 2

1 70 0 73 7 0 12 1

2 91 0 83

0 113 0 67


AM 69 586 10 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 25 619 24 PM

1 2 1 Lanes

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM


237 0 125 411 0 246


AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM 1384668

747

716

662

0

South Leg

348511 0

East Leg

North Leg

1790

646

1327

0

South Leg

East Leg

665

0 0

880910

West Leg

0

West Leg

572

End

Total Ins & Outs

North Leg

662

0

716

Northbound Approach

9:00 AM

NONE

1710

0

6:00 PM

963

0


Count Periods

AM

Start

4:00 PM

16-6173-016

NOON Peak Hour

NOON

PM

7:00 AM

NONE

Day:

EastboundA

pproach

N Ayala Dr and W Renaissance Pkwy , Rialto

PM Peak Hour

326

963

0

880

Signalized

CONTROL

430 PM

237 0 125

NAy

ala

DrAM Peak Hour

Thursday

Wes

tbou

ndA

ppro

ach

Rialto

Date:

235 0

700 AM

Peak Hour Summary


W Renaissance Pkwy



Date:





PEAK HR VOL : 69 586 10 134 542 71 70 91 113 7 97 307 2097


CONTROL :

ThursdayProject ID:

City:

16-6173-016

Rialto

EASTBOUND

TOTALS11/17/2016

SOUTHBOUND UTURNS

W Renaissance Pkwy

0.739

WESTBOUND

0.853 0.6010.777

NS/EW Streets: N Ayala Dr N Ayala Dr

AM

W Renaissance Pkwy

NORTHBOUND

Signalized



Date:





PEAK HR VOL : 25 619 24 219 637 54 73 83 67 12 46 188 2047


CONTROL :

0.707


0.976

Signalized

W Renaissance PkwyNS/EW Streets: W Renaissance Pkwy

PM


0.8450.870

Project ID: 16-6173-016

City: Rialto

UTURNS

11/17/2016

ThursdayTOTALS



Lanes 0 2 1 City:

AM 50 421 37 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 69 502 71 PM


36 0 41 0

297 0 330 2

1 99 0 91 102 0 104 1

2 279 0 392

0 75 0 58


AM 62 397 43 AM

NOON 0 0 0 NOON

PM 76 436 123 PM

1 1 1 Lanes

AM AM

NOON NOON

PM PM


409 0 475 435 0 475


TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RENAISSANCE … · Level of Service Standards and Measure of...

Documents

Transcript of TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RENAISSANCE … · Level of Service Standards and Measure of...