TPC Meeting

43
1 TPC Meeting Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Jia-Ye Chen 2007.6.21

description

TPC Meeting. Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica Jia-Ye Chen 2007.6.21. Outline. Pile-up Pulse Decomposition Study Pulse Identification, Fitting (Well & Failure) Statistics, Efficiency, Residual and Further more ... Pad Response Function (PRF) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of TPC Meeting

Page 1: TPC Meeting

1

TPC Meeting

Institute of Physics,Academia Sinica

Jia-Ye Chen2007.6.21

Page 2: TPC Meeting

2

Outline

• Pile-up Pulse Decomposition Study• Pulse Identification, Fitting (Well & Failure)• Statistics, Efficiency, Residual and Further

more ...

• Pad Response Function (PRF)• Smearing Effect and Parameterization of PRF• Experimental Measurement & Analysis

Page 3: TPC Meeting

3

Pile-up Pulse Decompisition

• Algorithm for Identification• Single Pulse & Shape Parameterization• Pile-up Pulse, Shoulder Pulse and Coupled• Failed Fitting (small pulse, plateau pulse)• Efficiency : Percentage of Pulse• Residual• Question & Problem

Page 4: TPC Meeting

4

Algorithm for Identification

• Pile-up Pulse• peakAdc > threshold (dynamic threshold)• Separation of peakTdc > 2 clocks• Pulse valley away from prevPeakTdc > 2 cloc

ks• Shoulder Pulse ( By Su-Yin Wang )

• Δ(ΔADC ) < -8.• Separation to neighboring peakTdc > 3.

Page 5: TPC Meeting

5

Single Pulse

Page 6: TPC Meeting

6

Single Pulse

Page 7: TPC Meeting

7

Pile-up Pulse

Page 8: TPC Meeting

8

Pile-up Pulse

Page 9: TPC Meeting

9

Shoulder Pulse

Page 10: TPC Meeting

10

Shoulder Pulse

Page 11: TPC Meeting

11

Shoulder Pulse

Page 12: TPC Meeting

12

Pile-up & Shoulder Pulse

Page 13: TPC Meeting

13

Failed Pulse : Saturated

Page 14: TPC Meeting

14

Failed Pulse : Saturated

Page 15: TPC Meeting

15

• number pileup pulse = 76946• number of single pulse = 41787 (54.31%) • number of double pulse = 33531 (43.58%) • number of triple pulse = 1294 ( 1.68%)• number of quadruple pulse = 334 ( 0.43%)

Percentage of Pulse ID

• number of good pulse = 2692664• number of single pulse = 2198194 (81.64%) • number of double pulse = 484378 (17.99%)• number of triple pulse = 7106 ( 0.26%)• number of quadruple pulse = 2986 ( 0.11%)

GOOD

Pileup

Page 16: TPC Meeting

16

Percentage of Failure

• number of pileup pulse = 54260• number of single pulse = 30534(56.24%) • number of double pulse = 22563(41.58%)• number of triple pulse = 956 ( 1.76%)• number of quadruple pulse = 247 ( 0.46%)

• number of (1) pulse =18 (0.0074%)• (percentage in double pulse (0.0177%))• (chi_square>4 , single pulse)

• number of (1+2+3+4) pulse =89 (0.16%) • (percentage in double pulse (0.39%))• (chi_square>4 , single pulse)

Page 17: TPC Meeting

17

Efficiency & Residual

Run 30501 : First 500 Events & only double-pulse event w/o triple-, quadru-, …

OLDOLD

6 Events/sec6 Events/sec

NEWNEW

1.5 Events/sec1.5 Events/sec

Page 18: TPC Meeting

18

Question & Problem

• Can we believe the fitting?• Yes, which should be fitted, which not?

• Polynomial Approximation, instead of exact Error Function Fitting?

• Computing Time : much slower than previous one.

Page 19: TPC Meeting

19

Smearing Effects to PRF

PWWdl

vD

W

D

D

T

22

12cos

220 costantan

2

2

2220

2WDDPRF l

transverse diffusion coefficient

drift velocity of electron

drift length

wire spacing

Lorentz angle due to ExB effect

TD

Dv

Dl

d

Page 20: TPC Meeting

20

FWHM of the PRFTRIUMF TRIUMF TPCTPC

Pad rows are parallel to the Pad rows are parallel to the sense wire.sense wire.

Page 21: TPC Meeting

21

Angle(T,W) vs Angle(P,W)

Page 22: TPC Meeting

22

Angle(T,W) vs Angle(P,W)

Page 23: TPC Meeting

23

Angle(T,W) vs Angle(P,W)

Page 24: TPC Meeting

24

Angle(T,W) vs Angle(P,W)

Page 25: TPC Meeting

25

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 26: TPC Meeting

26

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 27: TPC Meeting

27

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 28: TPC Meeting

28

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 29: TPC Meeting

29

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 30: TPC Meeting

30

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 31: TPC Meeting

31

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 32: TPC Meeting

32

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 33: TPC Meeting

33

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 34: TPC Meeting

34

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 35: TPC Meeting

35

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 36: TPC Meeting

36

Angle(P,W) Slices

Page 37: TPC Meeting

37

Parameterization of PRF

Page 38: TPC Meeting

38

Parameterization of PRF

Page 39: TPC Meeting

39

Backup Slices

Page 40: TPC Meeting

40

Pad Response Function

The induced charge distribution is called “Pad The induced charge distribution is called “Pad Response Function”. Response Function”.

Width of PRFWidth of PRF

1.1.Direct measure of Direct measure of the power to the power to distinguish distinguish between two between two close-by close-by coordinates.coordinates.

2.2.Determine the Determine the two-track two-track resolution.resolution.

Page 41: TPC Meeting

41

: chamber-specific pad response width, often normalized to the pad width ΔP by

Parameterization of PRF

Under the optimal design of pad widthG : the distance between sense wire and cathode plane

20

2

2exp)(

i

i

xxCxP

P 0ˆ

GP 2

0

Page 42: TPC Meeting

42

Smearing Effects to PRF

• The transverse diffusion• The angular wire effect

• The angle under which the tracks cross the wire-normal.

• The E × B effect close to the sense wires• The angular pad effect

• If tracks cross the normal on a pad-row under a non-zero angle.

• If more than one wire contributes to a pad signal.

Page 43: TPC Meeting

43

Experimental Measurement

New New

TPCTPC

By Nakatsugawa Yohei

Line Fitting (Lab. Line Fitting (Lab. Frame)Frame)