The Placer County Conservation Plan
description
Transcript of The Placer County Conservation Plan
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
The Placer County Conservation PlanThe Placer County Conservation Plan
Placer County Conservation Plan County Aquatic Resources Program
Program Overview
November 16, 2010
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Placer County Conservation Plan (PCCP)Placer County Conservation Plan (PCCP)
The PCCP Boundary is defined by political borders with Sutter, Sacramento, Nevada, Yuba and Eldorado Counties, and the easternmost extent of any watershed that has the potential to support salmonids.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
• Incidental Take Permit – FESA
• Incidental Take Permit – CESA
• Master Streambed Alteration Agreement
The Placer County Conservation Plan will provide 50-year permit coverage for the following permits:
• Issuance of Programmatic General Permit and Letter of Permission Procedures
• Programmatic Water Quality Certification
The PCCP would provide incremental 5-year permit coverage for the following permits:
The Scope of Regulatory CoverageThe Scope of Regulatory Coverage
• “Regional LEDPA”
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Covered SpeciesCovered Species
• Bogg’s Lake hedge hyssop
• Vernal pool fairy shrimp
• Vernal pool tadpole shrimp
• Valley elderberry longhorn beetle
• Central Valley steelhead
• Bald eagle (wintering)
• Swainson’s hawk
• American peregrine falcon
• California black rail
• Western pond turtle
• Bank swallow
• Late fall-run chinook salmon
• California tiger salamander
• Burrowing owl
• California red-legged frog
• Giant garter snake
• Legenere
• Cooper’s hawk
• Loggerhead shrike
• Tricolored blackbird
• Yellow-legged frog
• Western yellow-billed cuckoo
The PCCP will cover 50 years of “take” (impact) to 33 species, including:
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
PCCP – A Cooperative Effort PCCP – A Cooperative Effort
Potential Participating Agencies:
• Placer County
• PCWA
• City of Lincoln
Regulatory Coverage for:
• Land Development in Unincorporated Western Placer County and City of Lincoln
• Conveyance, distribution of water and construction and maintenance of facilities
• Conservation Activities
• Placer Parkway indirect effects
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
2060 Growth Scenario – Land Conversion2060 Growth Scenario – Land Conversion
Projected Land Conversion 2007 –2060 (Measured in Acres)
Analysis Zone Acres Percent of totalDevelopment Transition Area—County 4,900 7%Development Transition Area—Lincoln 8,800 13%Existing and Planned Urban—County 27,400 40%Existing and Planned Urban—Lincoln 3,400 5%Rural Residential—County 12,200 18%PCCP area excluding 56,70056,700 83%83%non-participating cities
Non Participating Cities 11,300 17%
Total PCCP Area 68,000 100%
Geographically, the County accounts for 65% of the conversion and the City of Lincoln accounts for 35%. About 90% of the County’s portion of the impact is predicted on areas already covered by the General Plan.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
PCCP Reserve Area PCCP Reserve Area
40,000-50,000 acres of land that can be permanently protected in a dedicated conservation reserve area
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
PCCP Core Areas PCCP Core Areas
Emphasis on watershed-scale conservation and restoration along the Bear River and Coon Creek
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
PCCP - SalmonidsPCCP - Salmonids
Dry Creek, Coon Creek and Auburn Ravine are salmon-bearing streams with federally-listed salmon and steelhead present.
The Bear River has salmon and steelhead up to the Camp Far West Dam.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
PCCP – CARP Area PCCP – CARP Area
CARP Conservation Strategy
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
CARP – The PCCP Proposal CARP – The PCCP Proposal
The CARP authorizes work in “waters of the County” for a variety of activities, including discharges of fill material; alterations to the bed, bank, shoreline, or channel of County streams, lakes, and ponds; and removal of riparian and wetland vegetation.
The CARP will consist of a local ordinance that addresses impacts currently regulated or evaluated by the Corps of Engineers and Department of Fish and Game.
The CARP will rely up on a “regional LEDPA” for implementation.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
CARP Definitions – Buffer AreaCARP Definitions – Buffer AreaCARP – County Aquatic Resources Program – the program through which the County will seek to regulate impacts associated with Federal Clean Water Act regulations (Sections 404/401) and State Streambed Alteration Agreements (Fish and Game Code Section 1602)
•Stream System – The area, measured from centerline of the stream to the edge of the 100-year floodplain or the edge of the setback, whichever is greater.
•Stream Zone – consists of the stream channel, stream bank and outer edge of riparian, if present.
•Stream Setback Area – measured from the edge of the stream zone to the edge of the 100 year floodplain or setback from centerline, whichever is greater.
•Waters of Placer County – those aquatic resources that may be present within the Stream Buffer Area.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
CARP Categories – Permit TypesCARP Categories – Permit Types
Category 1 – Projects with Very Small Aquatic Resource Impacts (less than 4,300 sq. ft.)
Category 2 – Projects with Small Aquatic Resource Impacts (4,300-10,000 sq. ft.)
Category 3 - Projects with Small to Medium Aquatic Resource Impacts (10,000 sq. ft. to 10 acres – wetland fills only)
Category 4 - Projects with Small to Medium Aquatic Resources and Other Impacts on the Environment (10,000 sq. ft. to 10 acres – wetland fills and other environmental effects)
Category 5 – Projects with Large Scale Aquatic Resource Impacts (greater than 10 acres of fill)
Category 6 – Projects Not Covered by the PCCP
Wetland fills only
Wetland fills and other impacts on the environment
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
CARP - Regional LEDPACARP - Regional LEDPA
If the PCCP conservation strategy can integrate:
1.Landscape Scale Avoidance of wetlands within the Reserve Area and the stream system,
2.Low Impact Development Standards within urban/suburban projects AND
3.Onsite avoidance within Stream Environment Zones and/or Floodplains (CARP Buffer)
The PCCP can be considered the “regional” LEDPA determination for 404 impacts. This avoids having to make a LEDPA determination on a case-by-case basis. A separate offsite alternatives analysis will not be required for projects covered by the PCCP’s programmatic permitting.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Key Element Key Element #1 - PCCP #1 - PCCP Conservation Conservation Strategy Strategy Reserve AreaReserve Area
CARP - Key Elements CARP - Key Elements
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Ad Hoc Committee MapAd Hoc Committee Map
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Key Element #2 Key Element #2 - Low Impact - Low Impact Development Development RequirementsRequirements
CARP - Key Elements CARP - Key Elements
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Low Impact Development RequirementsLow Impact Development Requirements
Low Impact Development (LID) Standards
These measures are intended to offset the water quality benefits that will be lost when avoidance/minimization measures are transferred to the landscape scale. The water quality benefits associated with avoided wetland and stream resources remaining in urban/suburban settings will be replaced by a range LID measures.
LID will also provide benefits to covered species, in particular chinook salmon and steelhead. LID will provide water quality improvements for salmon-bearing streams (e.g., Auburn Ravine, Doty Ravine, Dry Creek and Coon Creek). The watersheds for these 4 streams covers the majority of the potential growth area.
LID also provides flood control benefits, water conservation, and community design elements that emphasize open space.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation PlanConventiona
l Developmen
t
Centralized Storm Drain and Detention Pond
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation PlanLID Development
Conservation Minimization Soil Amendments Open Drainage Rain Gardens Rain Barrels Pollution Prevention
Disconnected Decentralized Distributed Multi-functional Water Use
Multiple Systems
Keeping Water Where it Falls
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Low Impact Development RequirementsLow Impact Development Requirements
Flood control benefits
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Key Element #3 Key Element #3 – Stream – Stream BuffersBuffers
CARP - Key Elements CARP - Key Elements
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Stream Zone Buffers and Setbacks Stream Zone Buffers and Setbacks
• Bear River – 600’ from centerline or the floodplain, whichever is greater
• Major Streams – 300’ from centerline or the floodplain, whichever is greater
• Major Tributary – 100’ from centerline or the floodplain, whichever is greater
• Minor Tributary – 50’ from centerline• Intermittent Streams – Structural setbacks 50’ from
centerline
The CARP stream zone setback is a land use buffer and a structural/impervious surface setback that is intended to separate incompatible land uses in order to avoid direct and indirect impacts along stream corridors.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
The Placer County Conservation Plan - PCCPThe Placer County Conservation Plan - PCCP
The CARP focuses on waters within the “stream system” and waters outside the stream system. Proximity to the stream system and/or size of an avoided reserve area defines avoidance minimization measures.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
South Placer Growth - avoided stream resources
South Placer – avoided vernal pool preserve
Conclusion – Improving on Status QuoConclusion – Improving on Status Quo
Onsite avoidance and minimization
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
South Placer – Stream zone avoidance
Created vernal pool preserve
Onsite avoidance and minimization
Conclusion – Improving on Status QuoConclusion – Improving on Status Quo
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Aitken Ranch Conservation Easement
Auburn Ravine
Coon Creek Watershed Conservation
Landscape-scale avoidance and minimization combined with restoration and use of mitigation banks for no net loss.
Conclusion – Improving on Status QuoConclusion – Improving on Status Quo
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Orchard Creek Conservation Bank
Bruin RanchWatershed-level Conservation
Landscape-scale avoidance and minimization combined with restoration and use of mitigation banks for no net loss.
Conclusion – Improving on Status QuoConclusion – Improving on Status Quo
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Conservation ObjectivesConservation Objectives
•Improved conservation and monitoring of conservation activities
•Elimination of governmental redundancy and inefficiency
•Integration into local land use and CEQA decision-making
•In-house expertise – County will propose to hire a biologist trained to COE standards for wetland verifications, enforcement and local assistance.
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation Plan
Conservation ObjectivesConservation Objectives
•Establishment of a large, integrated conservation reserve area
•In perpetuity funding for ongoing conservation activities
•Consideration of wetlands as a habitat; not a resource that is managed through a number of regulatory schemes.
•Coordination and integration with DFG 1600, FESA and CESA – there’s 1 conservation strategy
© Keith Sutter Photography
Placer County Conservation PlanFor information on this presentation, please contact
Loren Clark at [email protected] or 530 745-3016.
Placer County Planning Department
3091 County Center Drive
Auburn CA 95603