The Passion of the Fan: Using Social Media to Predict the NFL Season
-
Upload
jeff-esposito -
Category
Sports
-
view
1.637 -
download
0
description
Transcript of The Passion of the Fan: Using Social Media to Predict the NFL Season
The Passion of the Fan
The Passion of the Fan
A deep dive into preseason hype and outlook
for the 2010 NFL season across the Social Web
Jeff Esposito
JeffEsposito.com
Table of Contents
The Passion of the Fan .3
Methodology ..................................................................................4
State of the fan .7
AFC East ..12
Buffalo Bills 14
Miami Dolphins ..16
New England Patriots..18
New York Jets ..20
AFC North ..22
Baltimore Ravens ..24
Cincinnati Bengals .26
Cleveland Browns .28
Pittsburgh Steelers ..30
AFC South 32
Houston Texans .34
Indianapolis Colts ..36
Jacksonville Jaguars .38
Tennessee Titans .....40
AFC West .42
Denver Broncos .44
Kansas City Chiefs .46
Oakland Raiders .48
San Diego Chargers .50
NFC East ..52
Dallas Cowboys ..54
New York Giants.56
Philadelphia Eagles ..58
Washington Redskins .60
NFC North ..62
Chicago Bears ..64
Detroit Lions .66
Green Bay Packers ...68
Minnesota Vikings 70
NFC South ..72
Atlanta Falcons ..74
Carolina Panthers .76
New Orleans Saints .78
Tampa Bay Buccaneers .80
NFC West ......82
Arizona Cardinals .....84
St. Louis Rams .86
San Francisco 49ers .88
Seattle Seahawks ..90
AFC Playoff Teams 93
NFC Playoff Teams ..............94
NFL Champion .95
About this report ..........................................................................97
2
The Passion of the Fan
The National Football League is the premier professional sports league in the United States and draws a captive of fans audience across the country who live and die with each play of their team. In the past the passion of fans was judged by attendance, jersey sales and fan presence in opposing stadiums. The general buzz around a team was also generated by local and national media outlets. Social media has changed that as the fans voices can be heard just as loud and clear as a pundit on a pregame show. This report takes a deep dive into the fan-generated buzz for all 32 teams, predicting the divisional and Super Bowl champions based on the fans passion.
May sound crazy, but you never know...
3
3
Methodology
4
Measured social mentions for each team from August 1 through September 1, 2010 using Scout Labs software
Mediums included:
Blogs
Forums
Traditional news sites
Metrics used include conversation share, positive and negative conversation shares, SIM and Net promoter scores
Formulas
Conversation Share
Total team mentions / Overall league mentions
Positive Conversation Share
Total positive team mentions / Overall positive league mentions
Negative Conversation Share
Total negative team mentions / Overall negative league mentions
Net Promoter Score (NPS)
(Positive mentions + neutral mentions) negative mentions / Total team mentions
Social Influence Marketing Score (SIM)
NPS * Conversation Share * 1,000
5
5
Picking the winners
6
Unlike many methods for season predictions, I used social buzz to select division, conference and championship game winners. My formula equally weighs five variables to predict the top teams in each division, conference and league. These variables include conversation share, positive conversation share (mentions sentimented positive by the tool), negative conversation share (mentions sentimented negative by the tool), SIM score and Net Promoter Score.
To select division winners, I ranked each variable on a 1-4 scale (with negative conversation share counting negative 1-4) with the top team receiving four points while the lowest team received one point. The team with the most points is my predicted division champion. In the case of a tie, the overall mentions served as a tiebreaker. Wild Card teams were selected as the two teams with the next highest scores in each conference. In the case of a tie, remaining teams were re-scored against each other.
I determined my conference championship picks in a similar fashion with a 1-6 scale and the world champion was determined on a 1-2 scale. In the case of a tie in the championship round the tie-breaker was the team with the overall highest score from all three rounds combined.
State of the Fan
Heading into the 2010 season, the NFL had an aggregate NPS of 95%. The highest rating for an individual team was 99.98% (St. Louis) and the low was 88.9% (NY Jets).
During the month I collected data, there were 527,419 social mentions of the leagues teams. Ninety-four percent were neutral, 4% were positive and just 2% negative.
7
State of the Fan
Top Mentioned Teams
San Diego
Denver
Dallas
NY Jets
Minnesota
Least Mentioned Teams
Jacksonville
Tampa Bay
Kansas City
Atlanta
Carolina
Top Positive Mentions
NY Jets
New Orleans
Dallas
NY Giants
Cleveland
Top Negative Mentions
NY Jets
NY Giants
Cleveland
Cincinnati
Baltimore
8
State of the Fan
Top SIM Score
San Diego
Denver
Dallas
Minnesota
NY Jets
Low SIM Score
Jacksonville
Kansas City
Tampa Bay
Atlanta
Carolina
Top NPS
St. Louis
Jacksonville
San Diego
Carolina
Denver
Low NPS
NY Jets
Cleveland
Cincinnati
Baltimore
NY Giants
9
Overall conversation share
10
Arizona AtlantaBaltimoreBuffaloCarolinaChicagoCincinnatiClevelandDallasDenverDetroitGreen BayHoustonIndianapolisJacksonvilleKansas CityMiamiMinnesotaNew EnglandNew OrleansNY GiantsNY JetsOaklandPhiladelphia PittsburghSan DiegoSan FranciscoSeattleSt. LouisTampa BayTennesseeWashington1240210349150681917510455148051466615638275583497315124156261109415780741385621699522777160171752518894228901680512912171663859114009118451092185181202620840
Ready to see how your team fared?
11
AFC East
Buffalo Bills
Miami Dolphins
New England Patriots
New York Jets
12
AFC East Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: New York Jets*
Team Rankings
New York Jets - 9
Miami Dolphins - 9
Buffalo Bills - 8
New England Patriots 5
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Bills 96%
Dolphins 96%
Patriots 95%
Jets 89%
SIM Score
Jets 271.055
Bills 245.282
Dolphins 217.763
Patriots 203.564
Positive Conversation Share
Jets 48%
Patriots - 25%
Dolphins 16%
Bills 12%
Negative Conversation Share
Jets 54%
Bills 16%
Patriots 16%
Dolphins 14%
*= Jets win conference via overall mention tiebreaker.
13
13
JetsBillsDolphinsPatriots22890191751601716995
Buffalo Bills
14
Buffalo Bills
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
15
Miami Dolphins
16
Miami Dolphins
17
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
New England Patriots
18
New England Patriots
19
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
New York Jets
20
New York Jets
21
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
AFC North
Baltimore Ravens
Cincinnati Bengals
Cleveland Browns
Pittsburgh Steelers
22
AFC North Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: Pittsburgh Steelers
Team Rankings
Pittsburgh Steelers 12
Baltimore Ravens 7
Cleveland Browns 7
Cincinnati Bengals - 4
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Steelers 97%
Ravens 92%
Bengals 92%
Browns 91%
SIM Score
Steelers 265.054
Browns 228.373
Ravens 222.296
Bengals 215.261
Positive Conversation Share
Browns 30%
Ravens 28%
Bengals 22%
Steelers 19%
Negative Conversation Share
Browns 31%
Bengals 28%
Ravens 27%
Steelers 14%
23
ClevelandCincinnatiBaltimorePittsburgh15638146661506817166
Baltimore Ravens
24
Baltimore Ravens
25
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Cincinnati Bengals
26
Cincinnati Bengals
27
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Cleveland Browns
28
Cleveland Browns
29
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Pittsburgh Steelers
30
Pittsburgh Steelers
31
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
AFC South
Houston Texans
Indianapolis Colts
Jacksonville Jaguars
Tennessee Titans
32
AFC South Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: Indianapolis Colts
Team Rankings
Indianapolis Colts 12
Tennessee Titans 7
Jacksonville Jaguars 6
Houston Texans 6
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Jaguars 99%
Colts 97%
Texans 95%
Titans 95%
SIM Score
Colts 330.792
Titans 245.719
Texans 227.021
Jaguars 157.688
Positive Conversation Share
Colts 31%
Texans 28%
Titans 28%
Jaguars 13%
Negative Conversation Share
Titans 36%
Texans 32%
Colts - 26%
Jaguars 6%
33
TennesseeHoustonIndianapolisJacksonville1202611094157807413
Houston Texans
34
Houston Texans
35
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Indianapolis Colts
36
Indianapolis Colts
37
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Jacksonville Jaguars
38
Jacksonville Jaguars
39
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Tennessee Titans
40
Tennessee Titans
41
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
AFC West
Denver Broncos
Kansas City Chiefs
Oakland Raiders
San Diego Chargers
42
AFC West Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: San Diego Chargers
Team Rankings
San Diego Chargers 12
Denver Broncos 7
Oakland Raiders 7
Kansas City Chiefs - 3
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Chargers 98%
Broncos 97%
Raiders 94%
Chiefs 93%
SIM Score
Chargers 383.065
Broncos 343.502
Raiders 160.243
Chiefs 80.885
Positive Conversation Share
Raiders 30%
Broncos 28%
Chargers 24%
Chiefs 18%
Negative Conversation Share
Broncos 31%
Raiders - 30%
Chargers 22%
Chiefs 18%
43
DenverOaklandSan DiegoKansas City3497316805385918562
Denver Broncos
44
Denver Broncos
45
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Kansas City Chiefs
46
Kansas City Chiefs
47
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Oakland Raiders
48
Oakland Raiders
49
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
San Diego Chargers
50
San Diego Chargers
51
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
NFC East
Dallas Cowboys
New York Giants
Philadelphia Eagles
Washington Redskins
52
NFC East Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: Dallas Cowboys
Team Rankings
Dallas Cowboys 13
Washington Redskins 9
New York Giants - 6
Philadelphia Eagles - 4
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Cowboys 97%
Redskins 96%
Eagles 93%
Giants 93%
SIM Score
Cowboys 331.928
Redskins 249.564
Giants 218.019
Eagles 150.167
Positive Conversation Share
Cowboys 33%
Giants 33%
Eagles 21%
Redskins 13%
Negative Conversation Share
Giants 35%
Cowboys 23%
Eagles 22%
Redskins 20%
53
NY GiantsDallasPhiladelphia Washington18894275581291220840
Dallas Cowboys
54
Dallas Cowboys
55
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
New York Giants
56
New York Giants
57
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Philadelphia Eagles
58
58
Philadelphia Eagles
59
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Washington Redskins
60
Washington Redskins
61
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
NFC North
Chicago Bears
Detroit Lions
Green Bay Packers
Minnesota Vikings
62
NFC North Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: Detroit Lions
Team Rankings
Detroit Lions 10
Minnesota Vikings 9
Green Bay Packers 8
Chicago Bears - 6
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Lions 95%
Vikings 95%
Bears 95%
Packers 94%
SIM Score
Vikings 316.675
Packers 215.975
Lions 211.233
Bears 205.160
Positive Conversation Share
Packers 32%
Lions 24%
Bears 22%
Vikings 22%
Negative Conversation Share
Vikings 33%
Packers 25%
Bears 23%
Lions 20%
63
MinnesotaGreen BayChicagoDetroit22777156261480515124
Chicago Bears
64
Chicago Bears
65
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Detroit Lions
66
Detroit Lions
67
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Green Bay Packers
68
Green Bay Packers
69
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Minnesota Vikings
70
Minnesota Vikings
71
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
NFC South
Atlanta Falcons
Carolina Panthers
New Orleans Saints
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
72
NFC South Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: Carolina Panthers
Team Rankings
Carolina Panthers - 12
New Orleans Saints - 9
Atlanta Falcons - 7
Tampa Bay Buccaneers - 4
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Panthers 98%
Buccaneers 97%
Falcons 97%
Saints 95%
SIM Score
Saints 355.946
Panthers 218.008
Falcons 213.696
Buccaneer 176.319
Positive Conversation Share
Saints 57%
Panthers 16%
Falcons 14%
Buccaneers 13%
Negative Conversation Share
Saints 50%
Falcons 20%
Buccaneers 15%
Panthers 14%
73
New OrleansAtlantaTampa BayCarolina1752510349851810455
Atlanta Falcons
74
Atlanta Falcons
75
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Carolina Panthers
76
Carolina Panthers
77
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
New Orleans Saints
78
New Orleans Saints
79
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
80
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
81
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
NFC West
Arizona Cardinals
St. Louis Rams
San Francisco 49ers
Seattle Seahawks
82
NFC West Buzz Rankings
Conversation Share
Conference Champion: San Francisco 49ers
Team Rankings
San Francisco 49ers 12
Arizona Cardinals 9
St. Louis Rams 6
Seattle Seahawks - 4
For an explanation of the scoring, see page 6
NPS
Rams 100%
49ers 96%
Cardinals 96%
Seahawks 95%
SIM Score
49ers 274.336
Cardinals 242.024
Seahawks 228.949
Rams 222.035
Positive Conversation Share
49ers 44%
Seahawks 31%
Cardinals 24%
Rams 1%
Negative Conversation Share
Seahawks 36%
San Francisco 32%
Cardinals 31%
Rams 0%
83
SeattleSan FranciscoArizona St. Louis11845140091240210921
Arizona Cardinals
84
Arizona Cardinals
85
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
St. Louis Rams
86
St. Louis Rams
87
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
San Francisco 49ers
88
San Francisco 49ers
89
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
Seattle Seahawks
90
Seattle Seahawks
91
As per Twitter's restrictions: historical Twitter data is a sampled set that represents an approximate percentage of Twitter volume: 5% from 7/15/2010 to 8/30/2010, and 10% as of 8/31/2010.
2010 Playoff picks
92
AFC Playoff Teams
East Champ New York Jets*
North Champ Pittsburgh Steelers
South Champ Indianapolis Colts
West Champ San Diego Chargers
Wild Card Miami Dolphins
Wild Card Denver Broncos*
AFC Champ San Diego Chargers
93
*= NY Jets named division champs via overall mentions tiebreaker, Denver Broncos earned a playoff berth via the rescoring tiebreaker
NFC Playoff Teams
East Champ Dallas Cowboys
North Champ Detroit Lions
South Champ Carolina Panthers
West Champ San Francisco 49ers
Wild Card Washington Redskins*
Wild Card Minnesota Vikings*
NFC Champ Dallas Cowboys
94
* = Washington and Minnesota earned Wild Card berths through the rescoring tiebreaker
And the winner is
95
San Diego Chargers
Using the social buzz surrounding the NFL, the San Diego Chargers will defeat the Dallas Cowboys in the 2010 Super Bowl.
The final score using the metrics listed on page six has the Chargers finishing the game with a score of six to the Cowboys three.
96
About this report
This report was compiled using Scout Labs. The account was provided to me for research purposes.
The NFL and Social Media are two things that I am passionate about. Like many football fans, I am excited for the start of the season and have had discussions and debates in the social Web. I did the research for this report to see if this online passion and buzz had any relation to on-field performance. I figured using numbers was a better predicting tool than saying I like this team or mascot X is tougher than mascot Z.
This report was not done in conjunction with the league or any member teams. All images used in this report were from PicApp under their terms and conditions.
All team names and league marks appearing in this document are trademarks or registered trademarks of the National Football League or individual teams.
97
About this report
About Jeff Esposito
Jeff Esposito is a public relations professional with a passion for social and conversational media and writes on both topics on JeffEsposito.com. He earned his PR stripes working in the professional sports world. Jeff is currently a public relations manager at Vistaprint, a leading online provider of professional marketing products and services to micro businesses. He is responsible for the day-to-day management, development and growth of the company's social media properties and campaigns. He is also active in a number of other communications areas for Vistaprint, including marketing communications and PR. The information and findings are from Jeff Esposito and do not reflect the opinions of his employer or Scout Labs.
If you would like more information on this report or would like to contact me, please visit: http://jeffesposito.com/about/
98