The Network Infrastructure

87
The Network Infrastructure A Case Study on Third Party in the Process of NetworkingAuthor: Elin Lundström Supervisor: Jessica Eriksson Student Umeå School of Business Spring semester 2011 Master thesis, one-year, 15 hp

Transcript of The Network Infrastructure

Page 1: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

“A Case Study on Third Party in the Process of Networking”

Author: Elin Lundström

Supervisor: Jessica Eriksson

Student

Umeå School of Business

Spring semester 2011

Master thesis, one-year, 15 hp

Page 2: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

Acknowledgements

A thesis of this extent would never be possible to accomplish without the contribution,

encouragement and support from many people in Sweden and the Netherlands. The author

will because of this save the first page of the thesis to show her appreciation to these people.

First, the author would like to thank Jessica Eriksson at Umeå School of Business for her

valuable advice, corrections and support as well as the fast responds by email during the

author’s time in the Netherlands. The thesis would never have turned out this successful

without a supervisor showing this understanding and flexibility.

The author would also like to show her appreciation to the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

and especially to the General Manager Kerstin Gerlagh for the interest in the authors work

and facilitation of the necessary resources from the first to the last the day of the internship.

The unique possibility to be so close to the research object would never had been possible

without the Mangers generous sharing of contacts and inside knowledge about the

organization. A special thank to the respondents from some of the member companies of the

Swedish Chamber of Commerce that took their valuable time to participated in the interview

and show the author and her college around at the different offices. The respondents showed

with their actions what networking is all about and their shared experience from long and

successful carriers will the author bring with her into her future carrier.

A big thank goes to Malin Steendam, who followed the author to many of the company visits

and also through her daily support and facilitation of things around the work helped the author

to accomplish this undertaking in the shortest possible time. Thanks also to Thaddeus

Fortenberry, who took his time to look through the final work for corrections and spelling

mistakes. The author’s thankfulness goes to Clara Olovsson for also reading through the work

and for the friendship that extends across country boarders.

Last but not least, the author will express her greatest gratitude to her family and friends in

Umeå and around the world who are always there with their tolerance and support. The final

thesis would not be on printed paper without all these fantastic people.

Finally, the author is fully responsible for her work and she is in the end in charge for errors

that might be found in this thesis.

Elin Lundström

Umeå School of Business (USBE)

Amsterdam, May 2011

Page 3: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

Abstract

This thesis increases the understanding of networking and especially the role of third parties

in the network infrastructure. That networking is an important activity that plays a central role

for companies’ success is common sense in today’s highly changing environment. However,

the role of third parties operating within the networking infrastructure has only been research

sparingly. As the author’s literature review showed even though we have knowledge about the

network process and attributes of the different actors there is still a lack of theories to

explaining them. For instance, it is still unknown how the third party can successfully bridge

structural holes and how its specific characteristics influence the network. Furthermore, it is

unclear how this is affecting the people and consequently the companies involved in the

network.

The empirical focus of this thesis is on the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in the Netherlands

and the empirical study consists of a qualitative case study. Data is collected through

documents, participant observations and qualitative interviews in the Netherlands. The

research shows that the third party has succeeded in provide a business and social platform

that facilitate the process of combination and exchange of intellectual capital and this creates

business opportunities for the members of the network. The study contributes to the research

about the third party in the network infrastructure by identifying three success processes how

the third party can contribute to the business network and this are: firstly, in combining and

exchanging knowledge through a well-developed network structure. Secondly, through

creating anticipation and motivation between the members for sharing of knowledge and

thirdly, when bridging the gap between different actors with various kinds of knowledge. The

thesis also provides suggestions for how the third party can improve their work to create and

deepen relationship within networking.

As the thesis demonstrates the role of the third party in a network and as more business is

done within networks and with the help of a third party, it also has practical implications. In

particular, the study is beneficial for the Swedish Chamber of Commerce, but also for other

third party organizations that aim to improve their role in the networking process.

KEYWORDS: Networking, Social capital, Intellectual capital, Third party, Network

infrastructure

Page 4: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 The unknown benefit of third parties within the network infrastructure ................................ 1

1.2 Problem statement .................................................................................................................... 2

1.3 Purpose of the thesis ................................................................................................................. 3

1.4 The context of the thesis ........................................................................................................... 3

1.5 Delimitation ............................................................................................................................... 4

1.6 Outline ....................................................................................................................................... 4

1.7 Definitions ................................................................................................................................. 5

2. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 7

2.1 Choice of subject and a short overview of the research approach ........................................... 7

2.2 Methodology assumptions ........................................................................................................ 8

2.3 Research strategy: Qualitative strategy .................................................................................... 9

2.4 Research design: Case study ..................................................................................................... 9

2.5 Research method..................................................................................................................... 10

2.6 Choices of the overall theoretical framework ......................................................................... 12

2.7 Choices of literature ................................................................................................................ 13

3. Frame of reference ............................................................................................................................ 15

3.1 Introduction the theoretical frame of reference .................................................................... 15

3.2 The field of networking ........................................................................................................... 15

3.3 Different kinds of capital ......................................................................................................... 16

3.4 The Social capital frame work ................................................................................................. 16

3.5 Defining social capital .............................................................................................................. 17

3.6 Defining intellectual capital ..................................................................................................... 18

3.7 Combination and creation of intellectual capital .................................................................... 19

3.8 The three dimensions .............................................................................................................. 19

3.9 Introduction the empirical frame of reference ....................................................................... 21

3.10 Strengths, drawbacks and the theoretical standpoint .......................................................... 26

4. The Data collection and analysis ....................................................................................................... 28

4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 28

4.2 Research process ..................................................................................................................... 28

Page 5: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

4.3 Explanation of the observations and the access problems ..................................................... 29

4.4 Respondent selection and sampling techniques ..................................................................... 30

4.5 Explanation of the interviews and the access problems ......................................................... 31

4.6 Interview guide ........................................................................................................................ 32

4.7 The process of empirical analysis ............................................................................................ 33

5. Empirical observations ...................................................................................................................... 35

5.1 Introduction to the background .............................................................................................. 35

5.2 Introduction to the participant observations .......................................................................... 39

6. Qualitative interviews ....................................................................................................................... 44

6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 44

6.2 Interview BNConnect B.V, Mr. T.H.J Hoefman ........................................................................ 44

6.3 Interview Inter IKEA Systems B.V, Mr. Ehsan Turabaz ............................................................ 46

6.4 Interview Iggesund Paperboard, Mrs. Ann-Charlotte Runn .................................................... 47

6.5 Interview SCA Packaging de Hoop, Mr. Henk Lingbeek .......................................................... 49

6.6 Interview Heussen, Mr. Nils van Dijkman and Mrs. Stina Lindmark ....................................... 51

6.7 Interview, MummyMug B.V Cecilia Thorfinn .......................................................................... 53

6.8 Interview, Swedish Trade Council, Mr. Andreas Rentner ....................................................... 55

7. Empirical analysis .............................................................................................................................. 57

7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 57

7.2 Access to parties for combining and exchanging intellectual capital...................................... 59

7.3 Motivation to combine and exchange of intellectual capital .................................................. 62

7.4 Anticipation of value through combining and exchanging knowledge ................................... 63

7.5 Combination Capability ........................................................................................................... 65

8. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 67

9. Quality of research ............................................................................................................................ 69

9.1 Research quality ...................................................................................................................... 69

9.2 Ethics ....................................................................................................................................... 70

10. Further research .............................................................................................................................. 71

Page 6: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

Appendix

Appendix 1. The Social capital framework Appendix 2. List of interviews Appendix 3. The interview guide Appendix 4. Letter sent to respondents

List of figures Figure 1. Defining the problem area Figure 2. The Structure of the methodological choices Figure 3. The Research process Figure 4. The Structure of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce Figure 5. How the dimensions of social capital turn into processes

Table Table 1. How the contribution of the third party is provided in the network infrastructure

Page 7: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

1

1. Introduction

1.1 The unknown benefit of third parties within the network infrastructure

Today, the business environment is seen as a web of relationship – a network – rather than a

market with many independent actors (Johanson & Vahlne, 2009: 1411). In this kind of

environment it is known that social relationships are critical to develop and improve

businesses and that successful companies can be seen as good network builders (Smilor &

Gill, 1986: 39). Essentially, the need for co-operation has become evident as the environment

is often characterized by uncertainty, complexity and rapid change. This is important for all

kinds of companies, no matter the size, as companies often face difficulties in finding partners

and therefore also the knowledgebase to be able to find the required resources (Kirkels &

Duyster, 2010: 375). In line with this, research shows that companies that make different

linkages and combine capabilities from many diverse parties are more agile and move forward

faster (Van Heck & Vervest, 2007: 29).

The rising importance of innovations and adaption to the changing environment has changed

the nature of interaction and networking has been a dominant organizational form in the 21st

century (Scott el al, 2008: 1). A reason for this can be that networks offer potential for

learning and building trust and commitment that are preconditions to succeed internationally

(Johanson & Vahlne, 2009: 1411-1412). In line with this, many researchers have pointed out

the importance of networking and for instance, Johannisson (1990: 41) describes

entrepreneurs’ personal social networks as the “most significant resource of the firm.”

Although the network concept is not new, dating back to the 1930s in organizational research

and at least the 1950s in anthropology and sociology (Nohria, 1992: 1), the interest has

increased during the last decades. In the 1970s social network research gradually started to

grow and established itself as an important field within sociology, with the focus on patterns

of relationship between people and their implications (Van der Gaag, 2005: 3). Research

within the area of network theories investigates both the structure of the relations between

social actors and how patterns in those relations influence the different outcomes (Stuart &

Sorensson, 2004: 233). Parallel to this development, the term “social capital” was gaining

more attention and a growing number of researchers have invoked the concept of social

capital in their own fields (Adler & Kwon, 2002: 37). Even though social capital is also a

relatively new research area it is already clear that its investment-linked view on contacts

between people and the exchange through these contacts can be a useful tool when explaining

the achievement from networking (Van der Gaag, 2005: 4). Therefore, the starting point of

this thesis is that social networks can provide openings to collections of available resources

and also be a substitute for personal resources and this is what is understood as social capital

(Van der Gaag, 2005: 2). More specifically, the author decided, for the purpose of this thesis,

to use the following definition of social capital “...the sum of the actual and potential

resources embedded within, available through, and derived from the network of relationship

possessed by an individual or social unit” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 243). This definition

is suitable for the thesis since the third party can be seen as what is called the “social unit” in

the network.

Page 8: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

2

In general, the third parties, such as trade associations, have an important role in the process

of finding partners and/or resources and thus creating social capital that most often gives a

positive impact on the development of new and existing networks (Conway 1995; Grotz and

Braun1997; Hanna and Walsh 2002). The third party has a dual role in promoting growth.

Firstly, they ideally act as natural knowledge brokers. Secondly, they can also act as conduits

for the development of informal relationship that are the basis for the development of network

relationship (Pittway et al, 2004: 137). However, there is a gap in the research when

examining the third parties role within the networking infrastructure. The existing evidence

suggest that the third party is important for the development of informal relationships but the

process through which these relationship develop and affect the outcome has to be

investigated further (Pittway et al, 2004: 160). From the author’s point of view, the third party

in the network infrastructure is seen as the independent actor that is structuring and organizing

the relations between the members of the network with the aim to create and/or deepen the

relations. More specifically, the third party is in the chosen case seen as both the tangible part

such as the General Manger and the people working for the network but also includes the

intangible structure and relations that are set up of the third party and supports the network.

1.2 Problem statement

As the first section has concluded, it is known that networking is an essential activity in

today’s highly changing environment and that the network plays a central role for companies

success. However, previous research has focused on the benefit of networking from a dual

point of view between - most of the time - two actors. The role of third parties operating

within the networking infrastructure has to date received scant attention. Despite the

substantial insight we have today into the attributes of organizations as a knowledge system,

there is still a lack of a coherent theory to explaining them (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998:

242). Additionally, it is also still unclear how the third party can successfully bridge holes and

how specific characteristics influence the capacity of brokers (Kirkels & Duyster, 2010: 375).

In other words, firstly, there is a lack of knowledge about the combination and exchange of

activities that the third party is carrying out within the networking infrastructure. Secondly, it

is unclear how this is affecting the people and consequently the companies involved in the

network in different ways.

To examine these two main problems the study addresses the following research question:

How does the third party provide benefits to the members within the network

infrastructure?

Page 9: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

3

The Concept of Networking

Social Capital

The Importance of Third Parties

The Role of Third Parties

The Chosen Network

1.3 Purpose of the thesis

The purpose of this thesis is to increase the

understanding of networking and in particular the

third parties’ role in the network infrastructure. The

author will with her work provide knowledge about the

role of third parties within networking and present the

factors in which the third party can improve their work to

create and deepen relationships between members of the

network. The thesis will also generate and disseminate

knowledge about the benefits provided of third party and give

advice on how the third parties can create and exchange knowledge

and resources to provide benefits to the partners involved in

networking.

Figure 1. Defining the Problem Area

Empirically, the research will be conducted on the network activities of the Swedish Chamber

of Commerce in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. The author of this thesis has spent the last five

month as an intern at the Swedish Chamber. The fact that more business than before

transpires within networks and with the help of a third party, the practical contribution of this

paper is, therefore also, beneficial for the Swedish Chamber as well as other organizations

that will improve their networking process. How the author has defined the research area by

starting broad and narrowing done the topic, based on the purpose of this study, can be seen in

figure 1.

1.4 The context of the thesis

A case study, which is done in this thesis, emphasizes the real-world context in which the

phenomena occurs and due to this fact the author of this thesis thought it to be useful to

explain the context of this study (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007: 25). The empirical study is

performed during work at the Swedish Chamber of Commerce and carried out in the

Netherlands, Amsterdam during 18 weeks. The Netherlands has the most densely population

in Europe with its 16, 4 million inhabitants on an area of 42 500 km2. The harbor in

Rotterdam is the biggest in Europe and the Dutch transporters are in charge of one third of all

the transportations within Europe road haulage. The country is Sweden´s 7th

biggest export

market and the 6th

biggest trade partner including both import and export. 200 Swedish

subsidiaries can be found in the Netherlands and the products as well as the Swedish people

have a good reputation in the country (Swedish trade, 2010). The organization is located in

Amsterdam; the capital of the Netherlands that is a city with 738 000 inhabitants. The

Netherlands can be described as a multicultural society and in Amsterdam more than two

hundred different nationalities can be found (Netherlands Board of Tourism & Conventions,

2010). A market like this is built upon networks and relationship in which people are linked to

Page 10: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

4

each other in different, complex and invisible patterns. (Johanson & Vahlne, 2009: 1411-

1412).

The network that the study is based on is the Swedish Chamber of Commerce. The Swedish

Chamber is an independent, non-profit networking organization, which promotes commercial

exchange and networking. The aim with the organization is to serve as a network for

interchange between Swedish and Dutch companies. Today the organization has 156

company members from Sweden, the Netherlands and other European countries (The Swedish

Chamber of Commerce, 2011). This study is based within the context that will be further

explained in “The background” under the section “Empirical observations”.

1.5 Delimitation

Research on networking is a huge field that extends across physical, social, technological and

biological domains and provides an interesting area for research (Scott el al, 2008: 12).

Because of the huge amount of information, the author found it important to define the

research area. Therefore, the scope of this thesis has been social capital and more specifically

“the social capital framework” of Nahapiet and Ghoshal, (1998) as this structure facilitates the

purpose of the study to examine the role of the third party. The most important parts of the

framework for the specific case have been explained more in depth but the different

dimension of social capital have been kept apart. In other words, the independent effects of

these dimensions are analyzed and how they are correlating with each other could also be an

interesting area for research but is not considered in this thesis.

1.6 Outline

The organization of this thesis is around a “skeleton” built upon three main components;

problem, method and result (Backman, 1998: 33) within these structures 11 chapters can be

found.

The first chapter has the aim to guide the research process and starts with explaining the

problem background, that is justify by a problem statement and motivated by describing the

purpose of the study. To give the reader a bigger picture, the context in which the study has

been carried out is also explained. This is followed by describing the delimitation and the

most important definitions used in this thesis.

The second chapter gives the methodology that describes the author’s view of reality, the

research approach, the research strategy, the research design and the research methods used

for conducting this study. In the end of the second chapter are also the choices made regarding

the theories and literature described. The third chapter, “The frame of reference” offers the

reader an understanding of previous literature as a background for the investigation in this

study. The chapter is divided in to two parts where the first part explains the historical

development of network theories followed by a summary of some of the empirical studies

within the field and an argumentation around the strengths and shortcomings of the chosen

theories.

Page 11: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

5

Chapter four presents the data collection included the research process, an explanation of the

participant observations and the respondent selection and the sampling techniques. This is

followed by an analysis of the qualitative interviews and a discussion about the interview

guide. Additionally, throughout the chapter, the access problems are considered from a critical

point of view. The chapter ends with an explanation of how the analysis was carried out. In

chapter five and six are the empirical data provided and dived into three parts; background,

participant observations and qualitative interviews for getting a good structure in the seventh

chapter that consists of the empirical analysis. The eighth chapter presents the main

conclusion drawn from this study that also includes a discussion about the contribution of the

thesis. Chapter nine highlights the quality of the research. In chapter the ten is advice for

further research given and the thesis ends with a reference list.

1.7 Definitions

For the reader to understand this thesis some definitions can be desirable. The following have

been used in this thesis:

Social capital: “...the sum of the actual and potential resources embedded within, available

through, and derived from the network of relationship possessed by an individual or social

unit” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 243).

Intellectual capital: “the knowledge and knowing capability of a social collectivity, such as

an organization, intellectual community or professional practice” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal,

1998: 245).

Networking Event: “All those business, quasi-business, and social situations in which you

have opportunities to develop valuable connections” (Barber & Waymond, 2007: 4).

Organization: “Any group you join for the purpose of making business connections

(professional association, Chamber of Commerce, alumni group, business referral group,

board, etc.)” (Barber & Waymond, 2007: 4)

Social explicit knowledge: the shared body of knowledge; personify for instance by scientific

communities and often regarded as the most advanced form of knowledge (Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, 1998: 247)

Social tactic knowledge: embedded in the social and institutional practice and resides in

tactic experience enactment of the collective (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 247)

Obligation: “a commitment or duty to undertake some activity in the future” (Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, 1998: 255).

Identification: “the process whereby individuals see themselves as one with other persons or

a group of people” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 255).

Page 12: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

6

Third party: the independent actor that is structuring and organizing the relations between

the members of the network with the aim to create and/or deepen the relations

Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs): small companies with up to 49 employees and

medium sized companies with 50 to 250 employees.

Page 13: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

7

2. Methodology

2.1 Choice of subject and a short overview of the research approach

The interest in writing about networking and foremost a third party’s networking activities

derives from the attractiveness of learning more about this highly important research area.

The fact that the author was spending the semester abroad and could observe the activities and

outcomes within an existing network made the choice of the topic even easier. The acquired

contact with the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in the Netherlands contributed to the choice

of where to carry out the study. Furthermore, social capital has become an established

paradigm but the applicability is still relatively unclear. Networking and social capital

therefore provides the focus of this paper and enriching the understanding about these

different ties, their use and application.

Because relatively few studies have been performed about the role of the third parties in the

process of networking, the author realized that the problem statement would be better

addressed by theory-building (traditionally an inductive approach) rather than theory-testing.

Nevertheless, the author has throughout used the Social Capital Framework of Nahapiet and

Ghoshal (1998) as a theoretical structure, that helped to collect and interpret the data, which

also gives the study strongly deductive influences (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 11). Nevertheless, it

is important to point out that this theory was never used with the aim to be tested and the

theory generating approach is hence evident in that the empirical data is utilized to develop an

understanding of the role of third parties in networks within the scope of Nahapiet and

Ghoshal’s Social Capital Framework.

Largely a more exploratory stance was considered suitable for this thesis. Saunders, Lewis

and Thornhill (2009: 133) agree that exploratory studies is beneficial in order to find out what

is happening, clarify a problem, seeking new insights and asking questions and this together

with a qualitative approach was chosen as it delivered the data necessary to answering the

problem statement. The qualitative study is carried out using the research design called a case

study, this kind of approach is beneficial when the author aim to gain intensive and as well as

an in-depth examination of the object of concern as in this case the role of third party

(Bryman & Bell, 2007: 62-63). The research method used to gain the empirical information to

this case study was the collection and qualitative analysis of text and documents, participant

observations as well as qualitative interviews. These are all different qualitative research

methods that differ from each other considerably (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 404). The

methodological assumptions explained above were linked to the purpose of the study and the

aim to answer the problem statement.In what is following the research approach will be

discussed more in-depth. The purpose with a detailed explanation of the method of the thesis

is replication and evaluation. With replication is meant that the method should be possible to

replicate for someone else and the evolution will bring the possibility to value the empirical

process (Backman, 1998: 37-38). Figure 2 shows the structure of the methodology choices.

Figure 2: The Structure of the methodological choices

Page 14: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

8

2.2 Methodology assumptions

Before moving on to the research strategy, it is necessary to consider the author’s view of

reality as this has influenced the outcome of the study. Explaining what reality is, how reality

can be examined and what method to use are all concerns related to ontology, epistemology

and the methods (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 16-24).

Firstly, the ontological assumptions in this thesis can be seen as constructivism and this

means that the social phenomena and meanings are constantly being accomplished by social

actors (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 23). Secondly, for the epistemology assumptions a position of

interpretivism is taken and this is predicated upon the view that a strategy is required that

respects the differences between people and objects and this requires a social scientist to grasp

the subjective meaning of social action (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 19). In the specific case this

means that it’s the author subjective meaning of the case that is provided. Although the

theory-building process in inductive research sometimes can be seen as “subjective”, a well-

done research can on the other hand be seen as natural because its close adherence to the data

keep the researchers “honest” (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007: 25). The fact that the author has

been working within the network and making observation has given a relatively honest picture

of the role of third party. On the other hand, the close relations to the actors within the

network can also have given the consequences that some of the things have not been

observed. These could be things as behavior, discussions and happenings that were constantly

coming back and because of this after a while was taken for granted.

What also has to be considered is that the author has taken a sociology perspective where

these are some of the basic principles that are making up the structural economic sociology:

1. “Economic actions is a form of social actions

2. Economic action is socially situated or embedded

3. Economic institutions are social constructions” (Granowetter & Swedberg, 2001: 8)

Accordingly, the focus has been on theories and assumptions contradicted to the classical

economic concept that sees the market as a homogenous collection of identical suppliers and

buyers. The focus is rather on relationship than attributes and on structured pattern of

interactions rather than isolated individual actors (Scott el al, 2008: 1). The reason for taking

this perspective is also due to the purpose to provide knowledge about the role of third parties

in the infrastructure that characterize today´s business environment. The authors of the main

“Social capital framework” used also sees that the roots of social and intellectual capital is

deeply embedded in social relations and in the structure of these relations and is therefore in

line with the authors own assumption (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 260). The author’s aim

has been to provide the members’ subjective world but the consequence of the ontological

assumptions have been that it’s the author of the thesis that outermost interpret the

contribution of the third party in this network. In other words, the author’s subjective meaning

of social action has influenced the outcome of this study and therefore the reader of the thesis

has to keep these methodology assumptions in mind.

Page 15: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

9

2.3 Research strategy: Qualitative strategy

In this thesis, a qualitative strategy is used when collecting the data. This research strategy, as

also seen in this thesis, usually emphasizes words rather than quantification when gathering

and analyzing the data (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 28). Furthermore, this approach can as

Bryman and Bell (2007: 416) state offer a more clarification important to the subject and

understand and observe the reality from the research objects view. This was according to the

author an appropriate approach to the addressed problem since the author wanted to provide a

holistic view of the case. This is also in line with the previously explained fact that

researchers followed the qualitative approach takes the epistemology position of

interpretivism.

The qualitative strategy do not aim to identify a statistically representative set of respondents

and expressing results in relative frequencies could therefore be misleading (Pope et al, 2000:

114). On the other hand, the qualitative research approach is not as standardized as

quantitative research and this gives possibilities for variety, (Backman, 2008: 4). This was

beneficial in this specific thesis as the research started very broadly before the author left

Sweden and the focus was narrowed done during the work at the Swedish Chamber. This kind

of approach is also mainly used when the researcher aims to see pattern in the society and in

these settings is quantitative factors as age and gender less important compared to the

individual’s capacity (Frost, 1997: 10). In line with this, the author of this thesis wanted to

identify the role of third party and therefore the quantitative research was more suitable for

that purpose.

However, when taking on this approach the concern is raised that the view is might getting

different from what an outsider would have expected (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 416). In this

thesis, the concern can rise because of the author interpretation of the phenomena and the

insider information gained during the work. Another concern that the author has taken into

consideration is the fact that qualitative studies in general provide a wide extent of

information (Backman, 1998: 57). To overcome this problem the author was aware of the fact

that she had to structure and selects the most relevant information in the meantime when the

data was collected.

2.4 Research design: Case study

Within the qualitative approach, a case study approach is used in the studied case. Saunder et

al (2009: 139) describes this as “a strategy for doing research which involves an empirical

investigation of a particular and contemporary phenomenon within its real life context using

multiple sources of evidence”. This case can be a community or a person or as in this thesis an

organization such as the Swedish Chamber of Commerce (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 39). In this

thesis the Chamber of Commerce and especially the network within the organization is in the

interest of the author and an as the aim is to make an in-depth evaluation of this the case study

is a suitable research design for the case. In a single case study, the challenge of presenting

rich qualitative data is addressed by simply presenting a complete rendering of the story

within the text (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007: 29).

Page 16: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

10

From the author’s point of view, the Chamber of Commerce can be seen as a “representative

or typical case” and this kind of case search exemplifies a form of organization (Bryman and

Bell, 2007: 64). Therefore, the case study approach examines the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce in Amsterdam. With the risk for transferability, this could be representative for

other Swedish Chamber of Commerce (see Quality of research). On the other hand, additional

studies have to be completed before it can be valid. Recently, multiple-case study designs

have become more common, this approach is used with the aim to comparing the included

cases (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 64). Anyway, since the purpose of the thesis is to examine the

third parties’ role the author has not seen it necessary to compare and contrast the findings as

the thesis is rather aiming to show the overall opinion of the people involved.

Furthermore, a case study often favors qualitative methods as these are viewed as helpful in

the generation of an intensive, detailed examination of a case (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 62).

The research strategy – a qualitative strategy - will be elaborated further in the next section as

the three research methods used in this case study will be explained more in detail.

2.5 Research method

In this thesis, empirical data was collected through participant observations, qualitative

analysis of text and documents, as well as qualitative interviews. A case study can,

accordingly to Eisenhardt and Graebner (2007: 28), include a rich variety of data sources and

it’s called a triangulation when more than one source of data is used in the study of a social

phenomenon. The motivation for this is that “a combination of methods…emerges as the most

valid and reliable way to develop understanding of such a complex social reality as the

corporation” (Kanter, 1977: 337). Furthermore, the author also believes that in order to use

different qualitative methods can avoid too great reliance on just one approach, which in this

case study was appropriate to give a holistic view of the chosen case. In what is following the

three methods will be explained, as well as why these are appropriate according to the

problem statement and lastly the purpose will be elaborated further.

2.5.1 The Ethnography and participant observation

The author began to collect the data using ethnography (also referred to as participant

observation) and this approach was used during the entire time at the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce. In short, the research method is based on that a person joins a group for an

extended period and is observing behavior, listening to the conversations and asking question.

The research approach can also be described as an attempt to describe a variety of aspects and

norms of a culture group to gain understanding of the people being studied (Malterud, 2001:

1). The difference between the definition of Ethnography and Participant observation is not

easy to distinguish but the term used in what follows will be ethnography to show that the

author has done more than just observing during the process of collecting the data (Bryman

and Bell, 2007: 442).

The fact that the author got the unique chance to be close to the research object (the Swedish

Chamber of Commerce) during a longer period made the choice easy to use ethnography as

one of the research methods. The purpose: “to increase the understanding of networking and

Page 17: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

11

especially the third parties role in the networking infrastructure” was also - to a high degree -

fulfilled through using this approach.

The author, together with the manager of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in the

Netherlands, decided how the ethnography was going to be carried out and what role the

ethnographer was going to have. The role taken was in the end “Participant- as observer” and

this is a role were the researcher is a fully functioning member of the social settings but the

members of the social settings are aware of the fact that the ethnographer is a researcher

(Bryman and Bell. 2007: 454). This choice was because the author was responsible for many

other tasks additional to conducting the thesis and this research method.

In line with this, the approach was also beneficial as the author got to be close to the research

object in a wide range of different situations during the observations the author also realizes

the importance of observing other things than the people, such as the different environment

and social settings. Malterud (2001: 1) explains that the researcher must go into the field and

get close to the people and involved in the environment in order to learn about the enormous

amount of things that influence the research objective.

Finally, for the author to narrow done what to observe the main aim with the ethnography was

to get more information about the structural dimension of the “The social capital framework”,

which will be discussed later. More in detail, how this was done in practice is explained under

the data collection and analysis.

2.5.2 Interviewing in qualitative research

As a complement to the ethnography, qualitative interviews were used. This was motivated by

their flexibility to collect the required data to answer the problem statement (Bryman and

Bell, 2007: 472). Eisenhardt & Graebner (2007: 28) state that interviews are an efficient way

to collect rich empirical data especially if the phenomenon is episodic and infrequent. The fact

that the author is examining a network with many different parts made interview a suitable

research method. The most popular types of interviews are the unstructured interview and the

semi-structured interviews. The latter has gained the focus in this thesis. Furthermore,

qualitative interviews are well connected to the exploratory purpose of the research purpose

that is followed in this thesis as the research objectives are explaining their view of the

phenomena (Saunders et. al., 2009: 113). As will be seen later on, the interviews carried out

were as other qualitative interviews, based on that the researcher asked simple questions and

received complex and comprehensive answers (Trost, 1997: 7).

The qualitative interviews differ from quantitative research and tend to be less structured and

show a greater interest in the interviewee’s point of view (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 473-474).

Therefore, this approach was suitable for this thesis as the aim with the interviews was to get

the opinion of the network participant’s.

It is also important to point out that qualitative interviews have been criticized for not being

scientific enough and too objective (Kvale, 1997: 268). However, the aim with the interviews

Page 18: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

12

carried out was mainly to provide information about the relational -and the cognitive

dimension of social capital. Therefore, the emphasis was on how the person interviewed

framed and understood the issues and events and the research method can therefore be seen as

suitable in the specific case (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 475).

2.5.3 Documents as sources of data

To get additional data to the observations and interview and thus a depth in the collection of

data, information from documents were added. These documents gave a bigger understanding

about the specific case and the necessary knowledge about the activities that the third party is

organizing each year. The emphasis was on both documents that had not been asked for from

the author herself but just available and ready to use and material that is more specific was

also asked for and kindly provided by the Manager at the Swedish Chamber of Commerce. In

other word, the complicated part for the author was not to collect this information but to

interpret the meaning of the material (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 554). The reason for also using

this information was that it complemented the two other methods used and gave additional

information that was not possible to gain through the empirical observations or the interviews.

The material taken into consideration was mainly organizational documents some of these

were public domains and others were not. The documents came mainly from the website of

the Swedish Chamber in the Netherlands (the Swedish Chamber of Commerce, 2011), the

Swe-Cham magazine1, other information sent to the members for instance newsletters,

invitations and other handouts. Anyway, as already mention the problem with this kind of

information is not to get the access to it but is rather the credibility and representativeness

when analyzing the information (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 556). With this in mind, the author

tried to get access to information not just available within the chamber of commerce but also

information from the companies within the network. However, to narrow done the amount of

information public documents and mass media outputs were used as a less important part.

Because it´s very likely that the documents are written from a certain point of view and not

representative for how the different actors perceive the situation in which they are involved,

the organizational documents have in line with the ethnography observations mainly been

used to get more information about the structural dimension of the social capital.

2.6 Choices of the overall theoretical framework

For the purposes of this study, the author applied Nahapiet and Ghoshal's (1998) organizing

framework. The main reason for this choice is that its offers a reasonably comprehensive

conceptualization of social capital that accommodates major concerns of the extant literature

(Mauer & Ebers, 2006: 263). Furthermore, the fact that the framework combines different

researchers opinion also provides a wide perspective of the concerns relating to social capital

was further a reason why this framework was chosen.

The framework is useful since it clarifies the dimensions of social capital and considers these

factors in terms of the structural, the relational and cognitive dimensions of social capital

1 A yearly magazine published of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

Page 19: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

13

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal's, 1998: 243). In different from many other researchers are Nahapiet

and Ghoshal's (1998) providing a framework that is despite the topics sometime intangible

line a relatively clear-cut model, possible to use in reality. This provided the structure of the

outline of the thesis and the framework together with complemented theories deriving from

the major concerns were utilized to interpret and analyze the data from the interviews,

observations and secondary sources. The choice of complementing articles to the “Social

capital framework” was made to provide a deeper understanding of the topic. In order to

fulfill this aim, both articles that supports and criticizes Nahapiet and Ghoshal's view have

been used. For the author of this thesis it was important to get a good base to build the

literature review on, namely Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998). On the other hand, it also was

important to get a broader view of the topic and not rely too much on just one source.

Therefore, the empirical studies of the network infrastructure were added.

When reviewing the literature, articles concerning the third parties role were rather hard to

find and other terms such as “broker” and “dealer” were used for what the author of this thesis

refer to as “third parties”. However, for the purpose of this study, the term “third party” is

used and additionally were some of the empirical studies within the field added to gain more

information about the role of third parties. The choices of the empirical studies are made with

the aim to get complementing and more diverse knowledge that derive from the reality and

practical experience of the role of third party. To gain a wider knowledge the author has

reviewed many different articles that have provided a wide knowledge base. Out of this

knowledge base have five main studies that are considered the most relevant when describing

a certain area been selected and used. The areas covered are: why networks form, the

structural and geographically spread, structural holes and good ideas, the identification of the

broker and smart business networks.

The framework and the empirical studies are further explained in the “Frame of reference”

and in the end of that that section the strengths, shortcomings and theoretical standpoint are

discussed further.

2.7 Choices of literature

In this thesis, the literature analysis was intended to justify the research question and build the

research design (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 94). In the process of collecting the relevant

literature, the author began looking for articles concerning networking. The author realized

early on the wide extent of the research within this field and the results show that networking has been studied in a number of fields within social science. These including: economic and regional geography; organizational behavior; sociology; operations management; political economy; entrepreneurship and small business; technology management; marketing; and, strategic management (Pittway et al, 2004: 141).

According to (Backman, 1998: 149) there are mainly three kinds of search methods that can

be used when collecting information; consultation, manual search and data based research.

The author of the thesis has used all of this during the process of developing the literature

review. Firstly, in consultation are the discussions, written or oral, with different experts such

as supervisors or professors in the specific field included (Backman, 1998: 150). The

consultation was used in the beginning of research process as the author contacted

Page 20: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

14

researchers, lectors and previously students with the purpose to gain an overview of the topic.

This was done even before the author of the thesis got her supervisor that could give

additionally advice. Using this strategy helped to find the main theories and the social capital

framework and provided the first structure of the thesis. However, to just use the consultation

was not enough and therefore the following two approaches were also used.

Secondly, as the research area was defined, a “Manual search” was used for a more specific

and systematic search of additional information. Backman, (1998: 150-151) states that

examples of this method can be research overview, reference lists, book references or

searching for books. However, the author had a few relevant theories in mind when starting

the work and this helped to identify some key words that served to define the boundaries of

the chosen research area (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 107). On one hand the literature review can

help to identify methods and gives information about how previous studies have been

performed. On the other hand, they can also show shortage in earlier research (Backman,

2008: 29). Due to this, during this phase the author also identified the gap in the literature

when examining the role of third parties in the network infrastructure.

Finally, the process of collecting the relevant theories ended with the most systematic method:

“Data based search”. When having identified the keywords the “Web of science” was also

used when extending the literature and this helped to find the central work and also the latest

research within social capital. Additionally, the main database that has been used for this is

the “Business Source Premier” and the key words that were used in the beginning were

“social networking” and “social capital” which gave 9141 and 12102 hits. Essentially, the

keywords gave a lot of hits and therefore the keyword: “role of third parties” (2601 hits) was

added. The added keyword gave a smaller amount of information to work with and the feature

“times cited” work in the database was also used to see what studies that have shown to be

important regarding to other researchers. In order to gain a deeper understanding, after having

finishing the first part of the general literature review the author also reviewed specific

empirical studies on the role of third parties, which gave beneficial knowledge regarding how

to carry out the collection of the empirical information.

However, the author would also like to stress some of the drawbacks with using the approach

described in this section when collecting the data. The fact that a qualitative approach is being

used gives the consequences that researcher, is a part of the research instrument and can to a

certain extent include own assumptions and stereotypes when reading what other researcher

have stated within the research area. Therefore, it’s important that the researcher is open

minded and considers different opinions when reading the literature (Backman, 2008: 57).

Finally, the author bore in mind the importance of that the literature reviews was made with

the purpose to answer the questions. Therefore, the author has tried to show synthesis,

integration, and analysis in order to not just provide a quick summary on the literature

(Backman, 1998: 67).

Page 21: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

15

3. Frame of reference

3.1 Introduction the theoretical frame of reference

The frame of reference offers the reader an understanding of previous literature as a

background for investigating the role of networking and social capital. The literature within

the field of networking includes perspectives from both a sociological and business

perspective. More specifically, in this thesis the focus is on social networking and the

combination and exchange of social capital to the creation of new intellectual capital. The

frame of reference is divided into two parts: the general theories followed by some of the

empirical studies within the field.

The chapter starts with a short summary of the historical development of network theories. It

followed by an explanation of the social capital framework and a deeper explanation of social

capital as well as intellectual capital from different researchers’ point of view. The first part

ends by explaining some of the theories on the combination and exchange in the process of

creating intellectual capital. In the second part, what the author consider the most relevant

empirical studies will be explained.

3.2 The field of networking

The network concepts are based around relationships between entities such as organizations

and people, and the properties of networks studied relate to the structure of these

relationships. Contradicted to the classical economic concept that sees the market as a

homogenous collection of identical suppliers and buyers, the networking approaches focus on

relationships rather than on attributes and on structured pattern of interactions rather than on

isolated individual actors (Scott el al, 2008: 1). In other words, economic actions are

“embedded” in networks that are built upon personal relationship. Granovetter and Swedberg

(2001: 11) state that a network is “a regular set of contacts or social connections among

individual or groups. The networking approach helps to overcome the conceptual trap of

atomized actors as well as other one-factor theories that are too simplistic to account for

reality. In addition, this approach is taken in this thesis. The reason for this is that the concept

of networking is very close to empirical reality and the author believes in line with

Granovetter and Swedberg, (2001: 11-12) that its use thereby prevents conceptual errors

common in mainstream economic theory.

The literature within the field of networking provides, according to Pittway et al, (2004: 145-

146), two major reasons for why business-to-business networks form. The first focuses on the

resource requirements of firms where they are persuade to make network relationships with

other firms as a way of obtaining access to resources they lack (Ahuja, 2000: 425). The

second view argues that the opportunities to establish links tend to reflect prior patterns of

inter-firm relationships. From this view, a firm's ability to develop network relationships with

other firms is consequently based on its existing relationships and network capability

(Granovetter, 1985: 1360). Summarizing, a lot of the literature shows that the most common

reason for establish networks is to gain access to new or complementary competencies,

technologies and markets (Coles et al. 2003: 53).

Page 22: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

16

3.3 Different kinds of capital

While there are several reasons for why business-to-business networks forms, the focus in this

thesis is on the role of capital. Capital can present itself in three fundamental guises as

economic capital, cultural capital and social capital. Economic capital is immediately and

directly convertible into money. Cultural capital is convertible under certain conditions into

economic capital can be institutionalized in the form of educational qualification. Finally,

social capital is made of social connections and it is under certain conditions convertible into

economic capital (Granovetter & Swedberg, 2001: 98). More specifically, in this thesis the

central focus is how the social capital facilitates the creation of intellectual capital by

affecting the conditions necessary for exchange and combination to accrue (Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, 1998: 250). Consequently, the author aim to look at the process as this is where the

third party has their role when providing benefits to the network.

Essentially, the topic of capital is broad but one of the areas that have been highly attractive

for academic research is the field of social capital (Scott et al, 2008: 21). The discussion has

been extensive in the scientific literature since the mid-1980s, when Bourdieu (1985),

Coleman (1988, 1990), and Burt (1992) offered their seminal contributions to explaining the

concept and many different conceptualizations of it have been used in previously research,

(Mauer & Ebers, 2006: 263). Social capital is not an individual possession as many other

kinds of capital but is instead jointly owned of those who are connected by social ties (Glover

& Hemingsway. 2005: 389). Consequently, social capital has potential value because it

provides an opportunity for actors to access information and resources in their social network

(Mauer & Ebers, 2006: 262). In other words, firstly, social capital lies in the persistent social

ties that enable a group to constitute, maintain, and reproduce itself. Secondly, it also allows

group members potential access to resources held by others in the group, for instance enabling

an individual to increase financial capital or information, expand embodied cultural or

informational capital. Thirdly, enhancing social capital can provide institutionalized cultural

capital by ties to organizations that bestow valued credentials and honorifics (Glover &

Hemingway, 2005: 389).

Scott et al (1998: 21) states that the conceptual basis of social capital is the fact of

membership that Bourdieu (1986: 248) explains as “a durable network of more or less

institutionalized relationship of mutual acquaintanceship and recognition”. Bourdieu also

points out that these relationships can exist both in the practical state, in material and/or

symbolic exchange that help to maintain them. Further, they can also be socially instituted

and guaranteed by the application of a common name and by a whole set of instituting acts.

However, the network of relations is the product of the endless effort at institution that is

necessary in order to produce and reproduce lasting and useful relationship that can secure

material or symbolic profits (Granovetter & Swedberg, 2001: 103).

3.4 The Social capital frame work

Despite the substantial understanding we have now about the attributes of organizations as

knowledge system, we until until 1998 lack a coherent theory for explaining them. Nahapiet

Page 23: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

17

and Ghoshal (1998: 242) aimed for a theory that could explain how business could gain what

Ghoshal and Morgan (1996: 14) called “the organizational advantage”. The authors therefore

developed a theory that is rooted in the concept of social capital and that integrates some of

previous researchers studies. The theory’s overall focus is the interrelation between social and

intellectual capital. Firstly, the authors define social capital in terms of three different

dimensions. Secondly, they describe in their article how each of these dimensions makes it

possible to create and exchange knowledge. Thirdly, they also argue that organizations can

develop a high level of social capital in all dimensions (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 243).In

what the following these thoughts and other author´s opinions will be elaborated further.

3.5 Defining social capital

As social capital and intellectual capital are the keystones in Nahapiet and Ghoshal’s (1998)

theory for the understanding of the network perspective, it is necessary to explain these

further. As, already seen the concept of social capital has been used in a range of different

situation. However, the author made early on the choice to use the definition from the “Social

capital framework” in this thesis: “Social capital is the sum of the actual and potential

resources embedded within, available through, and derived from, the network of relationship

possessed by an individual or social unit” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 243). The reason for

choosing this definition in comparison with others is because of the fits to the aim of the

thesis to examine the third parties role of exchanging and combining the resources in the

existing network. More specifically, in the case of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce is seen

as what is called the “social unit” and that is further an argument why this definition is kept

throughout the thesis.

Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998: 243) assume that when explaining social capital is it important

to consider this from three different dimensions; the structural, the relational and the cognitive

dimension of social capital. Granovetter (1985: 504) has discussed the structural

embeddedness, which concerns the properties of social system and the network of relations as

a whole. He argues that most behavior is embedded in the network and that this accounts for

much of the order and (disorders) that can be found in both markets and firms. In the chosen

framework, the term “structural embededness” is referred to “the overall pattern of

connections between actors” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 244). Burt (2000: 10) has also

contributed to the structural dimension and has identified four characters of inter-personal

networks: network size, network density, and network constraint and network hierarchy. Burt

has also touched this in his book from and states that is about whom you reach and how you

reach them (Burt, 1992: 12).

In opposite, “relational embeddedness” is the personal relationship people have developed

with each other through the history of interaction. In the chosen framework, relational

embeddedness refers to the relations people have that affects their behavior. More

specifically, “relational embeddedness” is referred to those assets such as trust,

trustworthiness, norms and sanctions, obligations and expectations, identity and identification

created and leverage through relationship(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 244).

The cognitive dimension is the third dimension of social capital and used for those resources

providing shared representations, interpretation, and systems of meaning among parties

Page 24: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

18

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 244). Shared understandings and cognitive schemes qualify as

social capital for mainly two reasons. Firstly, to communicate and interact effectively with

persons, actors have to invest in learning and understanding. Second, this investment creates

an asset that has a potential value, because a shared language and shared meanings enable

actors to gain access to the information and resources of their social relations, which they

could not obtain without the investment (Mauer and Ebers, 2006: 264). As illustrated, social

capital can take many different forms but to summarize they all have two characteristics in

common. First, they all constitute to some aspect of the social structure and second, they

facilitate the actions of individual within the structure (Coleman, 1990: 302).

3.6 Defining intellectual capital

There is already an established stream of research that identifies and elaborates the

significance of knowledge processes as the foundation of the organizational advantage

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 243). For instance, Eisenhardt and Santos (2000: 40) discuss

the knowledge base view (KBV) that considers knowledge as the most strategically and

significant resource of the firm. According to this view, if the knowledge is heterogeneous the

knowledge base can give advantages and superior corporate performance among firms

(Eisenhardt and Santos, 2000: 1). Organizational learning is seen as the foundation of the

knowledge-based view where learning can be defined as: the process by which new

information is incorporated into the behaviour of agents changing their pattern of behaviour,

and possibility, but not always, leading to better outcomes (Eisenhardt and Santos, 2000: 5).

In this thesis, the Frame of reference is focusing on the creation of social explicit knowledge

and social tactic knowledge of organizational advantage. The social explicit knowledge

represents the shared body of knowledge; personify for instance by scientific communities

and often regarded as the most advanced form of knowledge. Whether the social tactic

knowledge is embedded in the social and institutional practice and that resides in tactic

experience enactment of the collective (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 247). In other words,

social tactic knowledge is linked to individuals and is very difficult to articulate but as

knowledge is explored and put into actions and social justified it might be coded and made

more explicit into message that can be proceed as information (Eisenhardt and Santos, 2000:

3). The reason for focusing on these two kinds of “collective knowledge” in this frame of

reference is because “collective knowledge is secure and a strategically significant kind of

organizational knowledge” (Spender, 1996: 52). An alternative would have been to take the

individual knowledge into to a higher consideration but this was not seen as vital as the

purpose of the study was to examine the collective intellectual capital created within the

network.

Intellectual capital is in this thesis referred to as “the knowledge and knowing capability of a

social collectivity, such as an organization, intellectual community or professional practice”

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 245). The reason for also involving this in the in this thesis is

because of the clear parallel to human capital which holds the acquired knowledge, skills and

capabilities which make it possible to act in new ways. The Social Capital framework also

follows the stream explained above but is in different from other studies trying to explain the

actually exchange and combination of intellectual capital. Concerning intellectual capital

Page 25: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

19

especially two issues are important to consider; first, the different types of knowledge that can

exist and second, the issue of level of analysis in knowledge processes (Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, 1998: 245-246).

As the discussion above shows, knowledge is a complex area and a wide range of different

views and perspectives can be discussed. However, when discussing the knowledge created in

the examined network, is not the focus on the certain kind of knowledge or outcome but as the

next section will show rather on the process of combination and the exchange of intellectual

capital. This is also in line with the new approach of knowledge that goes beyond seeing

knowledge as a resource that can assume tacit or explicate forms (Eisenhardt and Santos,

2000: 4). Brown and Duguid (2001: 209) also follow the new approach of knowledge and are

in their research pointing out that codification of knowledge can be very different from the

working practise. With the meaning that a firm´s knowledge base is not a property that fall

within boundaries and because of this, the knowledge could more easily flow out of firms

than move smoothly within it. Because of this, to overcome the challenge to undercover the

innovative potential the organizations should according to Brown and Duguid (2001: 209) use

a dynamic strategy rather than coordinating it around conventional routines.

3.7 Combination and creation of intellectual capital

As already mentioned, the main view that is developed in this frame of reference is that social

capital facilitates the creation of intellectual capital by affecting the conditions necessary for

exchange and combination to accrue (Nahapiet and Ghoshal,1998: 250). This is in the specific

thesis seen as the process of networking. A relevant question to ask is therefore: How is then

this being done? When answering this question the approach of Schumpeter (1934) and

Ghoshal (1996) and believe that this is being done mainly through two processes;

combination and exchange. In other words, the pattern of linkage and the relationship built

through them are the foundation for social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 250).

The main argument is that the structural dimension influences the development of intellectual

capital. Anyway, the structural dimension might also influence the other dimension such as

the relational and cognitive dimensions of social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 251-

252). With this in mind, in what is following will the process of combination and the

exchange of intellectual capital be explained. The structure of the “Social capital framework”

can be seen in appendix 1.

3.8 The three dimensions

3.8.1 The Network structure

The fact that the social structure of relations in which a person is embedded presents

opportunities and constraints for behavior is agreed upon by many network analysts as well as

social scientists (Andrews, 2005: 355). The fundamental assumption in the social capital

theory is the network ties provide access to resources. One of the main resources gained by a

network is the information benefits or in other words, “who you know” decides “what you

know” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 252). Coleman (1988: 98) is one of the researchers that

have examine the gathering of information and he notes that collecting information is costly

Page 26: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

20

and the access to a network can reduce the time and investment for finding the right

information.

Furthermore, it is the ties in the network that constitutes the channels for information

transformation. For instance, density, connectivity, and hierarchy are all features associated

with flexibility and the facilitation of information exchange through their impact on the level

of contact they provide to network members (Ibarra, 1992 & Krackhardt 1989). One of the

most famous researchers that have discussed the role of “loose ties” is Granovetter (1973: 76)

and he argues that lose ties tend to link people from different groups together whether

stronger ties rather tend to be concentrated within particular groups. This aspect of diversity is

very important when it has shown that significant progress in the creation of intellectual

capital often derives from bringing together knowledge from different sources and disciplines.

In other words, networks and the structure represent different facts of social capital that

influence the range of information that can be accessed (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 252). It

is also important to point out that the social capital that is developed in a certain context such

as ties, norms and trusts can also most of the time be transferred from one setting to another

and through this affect the pattern of social exchange. This means that an organization created

for one aim might provide a source of valuable resources for others different purposes

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 253).

3.8.2 The Relational dimension

According to Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998: 254), the relational dimension influences mainly

combination and exchange in three ways. These are access to parties, anticipation of value

and motivation of parties to engage in knowledge creation through exchange and

combination. A wide extent of research shows that in relationship that are high in trust, people

are more willing to engage in social exchange in general and most specific in cooperative

interaction (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 254). For instance, Mitsztal (1996: 10) has observed

that trust can both give access to people for exchange of intellectual capital and increase the

expectation of value through such exchange. In this process, there is a two-way interaction

between trust and cooperation; meaning that trust is a lubricant facilitating cooperation and

cooperation breeds trust. This can lead to the development of generalized norms of

cooperation and this can in turn increase the willingness to engage in social exchange

(Putnam, 1993: 167).

Furthermore, norms of cooperation can establish a strong foundation for the creation of

intellectual capital. Coleman (1988: 104) argues “where a norm exists and is effective, it

constitutes a powerful though sometimes fragile form of social capital”. Obligation is also

connected to the relational dimension and can be defined as “a commitment or duty to

undertake some activity in the future” (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 255). Coleman (1990:

302) distinguishes obligations from generalized norms with the difference that the former is

viewed as expectations developed within particular personal relationship. Also Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, (1998: 255) agree with this and believe that in the creation of intellectual capital

both the obligations and expectations as well as the motivation are influencing the access to

parties for the exchange and combination of knowledge. The same authors agree with the

Page 27: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

21

common view that “there is no such a thing as a free lunch” with the meaning that exchange

brings with it expectation about future obligations.

The last thing involved in the relational dimension is the identification which is referred to as

“the process whereby individuals see themselves as one with other persons or a group of

people”. This might be the results from the membership of the group or through the fact the

group operates as a reference group. In this sense, identification acts both as the anticipation

of value and achieved through combination and exchange as well as for the motivation to

combine and exchange knowledge (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 255).

3.8.3 The Cognitive dimension

Many scholars agree that innovation often occurs through combination of knowledge and

experience and meaningful communication is an essential part of the process and requires at

least some sharing of context between parties. According to Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998:

253) this sharing can be built up through mainly two ways; through shared language and

codes and through sharing of collective narratives.

Firstly, language has an important part function in social relations because it’s used as the

resource by which people discuss and exchange knowledge. As long as the people share the

language this facilitates the ability to gain access to people and hence the information. On the

other hand if the language and codes are different, this keeps people apart and blocks their

access (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 253). Secondly, language influences our perception as

codes organize the information into perceptual categories and provide a frame of reference for

observing and interpreting the environment around. In line with this a shared language

provides a common conceptual apparatus for evaluating the likely benefits of exchange and

combination within the network infrastructure. Anyway, as already mention in order to

develop such concepts the different parties must have some overlap in knowledge (Nahapiet

and Ghoshal, 1998: 254). Additional, there is not just the language that influence the

combination and exchange but also shared myths, stories and metaphors have shown to be

important. The shared narratives within the network enable the creation and transfer of new

interpretation of events and this also facilitates the combination of different forms of

knowledge (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 254).

3.9 Introduction the empirical frame of reference

The second part of the literature review will provide the reader with the knowledge from some

of the empirical studies carried out within this research area. The aim with the section is to

give an overview of some of the previously studies that later on when analyzing the data will

be compared and analyzed with the case study made in this thesis. Pittway et al, (2004: 160)

in their article “Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence” mention the

four most important articles that have examined the role of third parties in the network

infrastructure. The author of this thesis finds two of these beneficial and suitable for this study

because the first articles well done examination of the reasons why networks forms and the

Page 28: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

22

benefits of third party and the second article´s interesting input regarding the structure and

geographical spread of the network.

The other articles mentioned in Pittway et al´s (2004) article were not really up to date since

Pittway et al’s study was carried out 2004 and consequently from the present author’s point of

view not considered representative for the latest literature within the field. Because of the

changes in the business environment during the last years the author of this thesis found it

necessary to add Burt article from 2004 discussing the importance of structural holes to create

good ideas. Two more recent articles from Dutch researchers: Kirkels and Duysters (2010)

and Van Heck and Vervest (2007) were added to benefit from empirical research discussing

different areas under the field of networking. The relevance of these five articles and their

contribution to this study will be further elaborated in the following sections.

1. Hanna and Walsh 2002 - Why network forms

The first article was found through Pittway et al´s literature review and has also been cited in

many recent studies (Thorgren et al (2009), Miller et al (2007), de Jong &Marsili (2006)). The

article is made by Hanna and Walsh (2002) and discusses the reasons why network forms and

is from the author´s point of view a representative article for this research area as it discuss

many relevant topics such as innovations, competences and the importance of trust.

Hanna and Walsh (2002: 201-202) is in their paper “Small firm networks: a successful

approach to innovation?” consider the trend of inter-working between small firms. The

authors argues that co-operation in a network gives the small firms the possibility to deliver

complex subassemblies and maintain their competitive position. Furthermore, it can also help

the small firms to be both innovative and minimize the costs that small firms otherwise rarely

will be able to update its portfolio without collaboration. More specific, the empirical study

investigates three network brokers in Denmark, Italy and the USA that were funded by the

government with the aim to facilitate co-operation between small firms (Hanna and Walsh

2002: 202). The question that is raised in their paper is if the small firms involved in these

networks are looking for innovation or the possibility to achieve the business targets? To

answer the question the authors are looking at the network from the third parties role and have

conducted semi-structured interviews with three network brokers in order to explain why

networks form and what factors that make them successful (Hanna and Walsh, 2002: 204).

The findings show, that the broker whose income was paid by the small firms, was very

successful in market the firms’ expertise and facilitate the co-operation among the firms

within the network. This was accomplished through the ways that the broker brought in new

orders, coaches new members and the broker was the reference point for both members and

the potential customers (Hanna and Walsh, 2002: 204). This is also essential for sharing the

ideas between partners in order to examine the possibilities for combining resources.(Hanna

and Walsh, 2002: 205). One conclusion to be drawn was that “maintaining the balance of

skills within the network is essential to its success”(Hanna and Walsh, 2002: 204).

Page 29: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

23

Furthermore, it was also shown that more than one firm had to be able to trade the same

competence but not too many or the membership will lose some of the benefits (Hanna and

Walsh 2002: 204). The main requirement for any co-operation proposal was the assessment if

the reason for the firm involve is partnership oriented or social oriented. In addition the size of

the firms was also shown to be important and the firms with at least 20 employees and a

turnover around 2 million British pound was argues to be the appropriate resource to network

successfully (Hanna and Walsh, 2002: 205). The trust was also seen to play a significant role

and especially if one firm is larger than the others and the broker main task is to build this

trust. A key element for the third party in this process is to always remain the independent

outsider and this is especially important as the soft issues tend to make or break the network.

It was also shown that a broker that had previously had his own company had a unique insight

into the factors that persuade the small firms to co-operating (Hanna and Walsh, 2002: 205).

2. Grotz and Braun 1997 – Structure and geographically spread

The second article “Territorial or trans-territorial networking: spatial aspects of technology-

oriented cooperation within the German mechanical engineering industry” is complementing

the first article and is bringing more focus on different structural environments and examines

the relevance of viability of innovation-oriented networks of small and medium sized

enterprises (SME’s). Despite the fact that this article is written in the year of 1997 does the

author still see it as up to date as it discuss the important topic about the access to other

regional that is also interesting and highly important to consider when looking at the network

examined in this thesis.

The authors have in line with the first discussed article carried out in-depth interviews with

SMEs of the engineering industry and with regional innovation consultants. The main

conclusion is that weak ties and innovation-oriented relationship are more spatially restricted

than generally assumed. In fact, the access to interregional contact networks is seen as much

more important (Grotz & Braun, 1997: 545).

The finding show that the important weak ties are still based in traditional supplier-customer

relationships and in general regional exchange of knowledge and information is more

connected the general business issues. Furthermore, the regional co-operation that aims to

overcome size problems is very limited and the local environment seems to be important for

gathering information whereas innovation and technology-oriented information tend to be

more common in interregional networks (Grotz & Braun, 1997: 554-555). Due to these

findings, the access to interregional networks is getting much more important as the firms

cannot longer rely on their regional economy. In fact, it also shown that the innovation and

information behavior is not that different between different regions and the differences can

rather be find on the products that the physical location (Grotz & Braun, 1997: 555).

Even more important, the empirical example also shows that it’s difficult to encourage the

development of integration unless a basic structure is already established. For instance, this

structure should include important expertise, skills, finance as well as a socio-cultural and

institutional infrastructure. The authors also stress the importance of a long-term perspective

Page 30: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

24

in the local network infrastructure and to create this can take much longer than five years

(Grotz & Braun, 1997: 555).

3. Burt 2004 – Structural holes and good ideas

The third article is written by Burt (2004) and has gained a lot of attention in recent research

(Evans & Lambiotte (2009), Kossinets & Watts (2006), Centola & Macy (2007)) and is in line

with Grotz and Braun (1997) also looking at the structure of networking. The hypothesis in

Burt’s (2004: 349) article “Structural holes and good ideas” is “that people who stand near the

holes in a social structure are at higher risk of having good ideas”. To examine this

hypothesis, the author draw on data describing 673 mangers that ran a supply chain for one of

the largest electronic companies in America, the data collected was background data as well

as network data (Burt, 2004: 359).

The evidence show, that there were numerous opportunities associated with brokerage. The

managers were also rewarded for brokerage as the compensation, positive performance

evaluations, and promotions were given to managers who brokered connections across

structural holes (Burt, 2004: 386). In fact, people who have relations that cover the structure

holes between groups have an advantage in detecting and developing new ideas (Burt, 2004:

389). Furthermore, the result also proved that mangers with a network that spanned structural

holes were more likely to express their ideas and share them with others. In line with this,

there should be evidence of brokerage being associated with good ideas and in fact, there is.

Burt article provides detailed study of processes by which information arbitrage occurs. For

instance, it is argued that the people with connection across structural holes have earlier

access to different kinds of information and interpretation and this gives them a competitive

advantage in seeing and developing ideas. The creativity that is generated is not born of

genius but is rather creativity as an import-export business with the belief that an idea seen as

routine in one group can be valuable somewhere else (Burt, 2004: 388).

Moreover, this shows that there is a market for the information exchange within the network

entrepreneurs and the evidence of their work is that valuable new ideas in any one specialty

are often a familiar concept in some distant specialty (Burt, 2004: 388-389). Finally, and of

great importance, the results have implications for creativity and the reproduction of social

structures in which ideas emerge (Burt, 2004: 387).

4. Kirkels and Duysters 2010 – Identification of the broker

The fourth article has until now not gained the same attention from other researchers as the

other three but is consider very relevant as it is carried out in the same environment as this

study. Kirkels and Duysters (2010: 375) study is focusing on SME networks and high-tech

companies in Southeast Netherlands. The aim with the study is to identify the main brokers in

this environment. In spite of the fact that the study is not looking into what the broker actually

does, the article gives one of the first empirical contribution to the discussion about the issues

of brokerage in SME networks (Kirkels and Duysters, 2010: 384). The study also investigates

if specific characteristics are associated with these brokers. Different from previously studies,

Page 31: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

25

Kirkels and Duysters (2010: 376) study is quantitative and is focusing on broker identified in

an actual network. The authors also states, since they are not limited to a certain sector or

broker that the research enables to generate knowledge about brokerage in general. In line

with this, the result of this study can be relevant also for other industries in the Netherlands

(Kirkels and Duysters, 2010: 383).

The main empirical results shows that the most influential brokers can be find in non-profit

organizations and the science sector and have long track of experience in their branch.

Brokers were otherwise many times seen as taking too much time and effort and still the

involved parties are dissatisfied. (Kirkels and Duysters, 2010: 383). It was also shown that the

people in the field seemed not interested in discussing finance but foremost the practical

support such as valuable contacts and innovation related information with the third party.

More specific, the research implies that the SMEs should most likely get involved in projects

in the non-profit or science sector. The investment should also be in the connection with

branch experience people with a broad knowledge base. However, the study is also beneficial

for non-profit consultant point of view as they often have problems in proving their success

(Kirkels and Duysters, 2010: 383).

It is also important to mention that the authors have excluded the foreign subsidiaries in the

network as a way to narrowing done the research. The foreign subsidiaries are many times

more innovative in comparison to domestic firms. The reason for this is that based on the

knowledge transfer from associated companies in addition to local knowledge and this fact

can make the foreign subsidiaries into an important partner (Kirkels and Duysters, 2010: 383).

5. Van Heck and Vervest (2007) – Smart business network

A researcher that the author of this thesis got the chance to listen to during one of the events

writes the fifth article: a network dinner, organized of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce at

Rotterdam School of Management. The article “Smart business networks: How the network

wins” is discussing the characteristics of “Smart business networks” and also how digital

network has become a reality (Van Heck &Vervest, 2007: 29). The authors are in their article

giving examples of companies such as Amazons and Skype and are showing the strong

network effect in these platforms. In other words, one of the first points made in the article is

that networking today is driven by technology and this creates what the authors call new

business network approaches where business network insights are combined with

telecommunication capabilities (Van Heck &Vervest, 2007: 32).

Van Heck &Vervest, (2007: 32-33) points out some critical steps in the development of these

networks. The first step is “to develop a profound understanding about the functioning of

business network”. The second step is “to develop a comprehensive understanding of the

expected smartness of the business network”. Furthermore, the keystones that are found in

smart business network are the ability to “pick, plug and play” business processes to be able

to meet the specific aims. In short, the success factor in the smart business network is to

quickly connect and disconnected with the other actors. The quick connect requires the ability

to find the members that can together fulfill the goals. On the other hand, to quickly

Page 32: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

26

disconnect is seen as more complex and how this should be done have to be agreed upon

while the members are still active (Van Heck &Vervest, 2007: 34). The conclusion of the

author is that the traditional network approach lacks the ability of a fast” pick, plug and play”

to meet specific requirements. The basis of the new network approach is to allowed the people

to act individually according to the joint rules in the network and this is what van Heck

&Vervest, (2007: 36) define as “own business logic” of the network. The overall conclusion

provided in the last article is that companies must develop and act smart within the network

infrastructure and this means for companies foremost to act smarter than competitors (Van

Heck &Vervest, 2007: 32).

3.10 Strengths, drawbacks and the theoretical standpoint

The key conclusion drawn from reviewing the existing literature is that the networking

approach has during the last decades gained more attention since it has helped to overcome

the shortage of the one-factor theories that are too simplistic to explain reality. As discussed,

Nahapiet and Ghoshal, (1998: 256) argues that the parties own the social capital jointly and

this creates a relationship with no exclusive ownership rights for individuals. However, as the

resources are located within the structures and processes of social exchange the social capital

is also influenced by the factors shaping the evolution of the network. Because of this

standpoint, this author believes that the theories discussed above are suitable to use for

examining the role of third party within the chosen network. Many of the theories are

consistent with the resources-based view as they highlights the competitive advantage of

organizations as based in their unique constellation of resources (Nahapiet and Ghoshal's,

1998: 260). This is also in line with the opening statement discussed already in the

introduction that networks are important since they provides the knowledgebase to be able to

find the required resources (Kirkels&Duyster, 2010: 375).

One of the strength with the main framework chosen is that it provides the foundations of a

visible structure that can be used to guide the actors that want to build or extend their network

and hence their stock of social capital (Nahapiet and Ghoshal's, 1998: 262). The author of this

thesis has not found previously studies applying the “Social capital framework” when

examining the role of third parties in the process of networking. For the benefit of

comparison, it could beneficial to judge this study against other studies carried out with help

of the same framework to compare similarities and difference when examining the role of

third party. Nevertheless, the author does not see the lack of articles as a drawback but rather

as a possibility to provide new knowledge to the third party in the process of networking.

The author added specific empirical studies to the general theoretical frame of reference and

these will give insight and provide a more concrete feeling of how the third party can improve

their work. The five articles, as seen, all add different information that will be useful in the

empirical analysis. Hanna and Walsh (2002) article will be used when discussing why the

network has formed and the factors that make a network successful. The second article: Grotz

and Braun 1997, will be used when focusing more on the structure of the network and since

the conclusion of their article is that weak ties and innovation–oriented relationship are more

spatially restricted than general though the geography of the structure will be analyzed

further. The third article of Burt (2004) “Structural holes and good ides” shows that the

Page 33: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

27

people that have relations that covers the structure holes have an advantage of having good

ideas and been arguing around consider the role of third party. The fourth article: Kirkels and

Duysters (2010) is in opposite from the other articles focusing on how to identify the broker

in the same environment as where this study is carried out and this will give additional value

to the study. Finally, the article by Van Heck and Vervest (2007) will also be used when in

the end analyzing how “smart” the examined network is when consider the criteria discussed

in the article.

All together, the “Social capital framework” and the five empirical studies are considered

relevant to use as guidelines in the thesis for the examination of the role of third party in the

process of networking and will therefore be used in the empirical analysis.

Page 34: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

28

4. The Data collection and analysis

4.1 Introduction

As mentioned in chapter 2, the methodology used in this thesis, in order to answer the

research question, was based on an interpretivist philosophy. With this in mind, the author

thought it is necessary to explain and analyze the data collection as this has in many ways

affected the outcome of the thesis. This chapter starts with explaining the research process

with the purpose to give the reader an idea of how the study was carried out. This is followed

by the respondent selection and sampling techniques and an analysis of the author’s

participant observations. In addition, the practical explanation of the qualitative interviews

and the access problems are examined from a critical point of view. The chapter ends with an

explanation of the interview guide.

4.2 Research process

The research process of this work can be dived into three parts; firstly, the preparation in the

library at Umeå university, collecting the information and understanding the literature. The

second part, making the observations during the period of work at the Swedish chamber of

commerce and holding the interview with the chosen people in Amsterdam and finally the

process of analyzing the information and finishing the work.

During the first weeks, the author was reviewing the existing literature and engaging with

what others has written in the area of research. Backman, (1998: 66) is arguing that to review

the literature is one of the most important step in the traditional research approach. The author

had in the beginning of the research a few references in mind and these helped to identify a

few key words that defined the boundaries of the research area. This research relied on careful

reading of journals, books and reports in the first phase (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 107). During

the literature review, the author also formulated a suitable research question for the specific

case. In the beginning, a very open-ended question was formulated with the risk in mind to

collect to much data (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 83). However, the question was refined during

the research and revised to fit the specific case better. The first phase finished with a complete

frame of reference that was later used when analyzing the collected data.

Secondly, during the research process it became clear to the author that interviews alone

would not generate the depth of data required to fully understand and investigate the third

parties role within the network infrastructure. The reason for this was that that more data was

required regarding the structure and cognitive side of the network and this was harder to

receive through the interviews. Therefore, participant observations as well as qualitative

analysis of text and documents were used to provide a way to explore how the network

operates. These were carried out during the time the author worked at the Swedish Chamber

of Commerce and helped the author to gain awareness and an understanding of the situations

of respondents. The essence of ethnographic research or participant observation is that it

allows qualitative researchers to get “inside the minds” of those being studied to understand

the values, meanings, motivations and logics which direct the actions (Curran and Blackburn,

2001: 113). In meantime, interviews were arranged with people within the existing network

Page 35: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

29

Preparation and litterture

review

Collection of data

(observations, secondary

data, interviews)

Evaluating and analyzing of

the empirical data

from February until June 2011. In addition, secondary sources were taken into account during

the period of work at the Swedish Chamber of Commerce. Finally, during May the author was

evaluating and analyzing the empirical data with the help of the literature review and the

chosen framework. This resulted in the conclusion that will be provided later on in the thesis.

Figure 3 shows the research process in three steps.

Figure 3, The Research process

4.3 Explanation of the observations and the access problems

The author of the thesis spent five months at the Swedish Chamber and was during this period

taking note, about the members, their communication and interaction with each other that

were summarized in the end of each week in order to find a pattern of the work and behavior

of the third pattern. Brief notes were taken directly after observing something interesting and

the author tried to be as discrete as possible to not make the studied people self-conscious.

One of the key steps in the ethnography is to get access to the settings that are relevant to the

research problem (Bryman and Bell. 2007: 444). In the specific case this was not a problem

since the author, through the internship, was engaged in the regular interaction with people in

their daily life, which opened up the possibility to carry out this research.

The empirical observations were performed during administrative work at the Swedish

Chamber´s office such as notes taken of the daily work and the contact with the members.

Furthermore, observations were made during mingling, events and company visits. The aim

with these observations was both to gain insight of the third parties tasks but also about the

members’ behavior, relations and the different actions taken. To gain better insight in the

communication within the network was also a vital part during the author’s observations. The

author took, in line with Bryman and Bell (2007: 460), into consideration to observe at

different times of the days and of the week. In addition, the conceptual factors, such as the

behavior in different locations, was also observed but to a narrow extent. The purpose of

doing this was to gain the most coherent picture as possible. The author finished her

observation in the beginning of May and had by then about 15 pages of notes taking from

different events and meetings. The data was summarized and categorized in to the three

dimensions of Social capital and this resulted in 5 pages that can be found under the section

“the empirical observation”. More, specific the choice to make participant observations

Page 36: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

30

brought a wide range of data and was therefore considered appropriate as it contributed to

insight to the analysis around the problem statement that had not been possible to gain

through just interviews. This data could be about issues that the people did to mention or by

purpose left out during the interviews. Qualitative research, based on observations requires

understanding and cooperation between the researcher and the participant (Graneheim &

Lundman, 2003: 106). This understanding was gained through the fact that the author tried to

get as close as possible to the research objective. One of the drawbacks of being so close to

the research object could have been that the author after a while started to recognize things as

normal and stopped taking notes about some things that were consistently happening. This

was something that the author took in to consideration and sometimes the same observed

things were written done again in order to make sure that no pattern was taken for granted.

Furthermore, the author also assume that if another researcher would have done an

ethnography within the same case the result would probably not have been the same and this

is also something that should be kept in mind. To overcome this shortcoming, the author has

tried to not make any analysis of the data during the collecting process and has kept the data

as unsoiled as possible.

4.4 Respondent selection and sampling techniques

As already mentioned, the purpose of the study is to develop theories, not to test them and

therefore, convenient sampling is appropriate. In short, in convenient sampling the case is

selected because it is suitable for enlightening and extending relationship and logic among

constructs (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007: 27). Many of the issues concerning sampling are

more or less equally for both ethnographic research and qualitative interviews therefore, in

what is following the process and concerns regarding the sampling techniques will be

discussed together (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 497). Convenience sampling can be considered a

kind of strategic sample, because the researcher involves the people that are out there, and

who have relevant insight into the phenomena under study. The researcher may also add more

people to the sample depending on what kind of information that is needed to answer the

research question. In this method is it not important how many people that are involved and

how they are similar or different from each other but the important part is to find a pattern of

the research objective and to explain this (Frost, 1997: 108-109).

The sampling was carried out in several steps. Firstly and as stated earlier, the studied

network was chosen because of the fact that the author was doing an internship for the

Swedish Chamber of Commerce in the Netherlands. The author was already before leaving

Sweden getting in touch with the General Manger of the business network with the request of

selecting the specific network for this study. As this was seen to be beneficial to the Swedish

Chamber and to the purpose of the thesis, the selection of the specific case was easy to make.

The third party within this network was also known to be very active which facilitate the work

to identify the role of the third party in the network infrastructure.

Secondly, the author discussed with her Manger the selection of companies suitable to

interview in order to answer the research question. The author did not set up any criteria for

what kind of company to involve in the interview and before she had spent some time in the

environment where the study was carried out. Instead, this was decided after some weeks

working for the Swedish Chamber and depended on what kind of members companies that in

Page 37: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

31

combination would provide the most holistic picture of the network. As the table shows, in

appendix 2, the chosen companies are both Swedish/Dutch, larger/smaller and are found in a

wide range of industries. In most of the qualitative studies is it important to get the biggest

possible variety within the sample, but with not too many “extreme” or “irregular” people

(Frost, 1997: 105). In line with this, the author together with her manager was choosing both

Swedish and Dutch companies, smaller and bigger companies and companies from different

branches.

Thirdly, the respondents for the interviews were selected from the chosen companies and the

persons asked to participate in the interviews are registered as the companies contact person

for each of the chosen member companies. These are the persons from each company that has

most contact with the Swedish Chamber of Commerce and were therefore seen as suitable

persons to choose as the respondents for the interviews. According to Frost (1997: 110) it is

the time and cost together with the purpose of the study that decides how many respondents to

select and how many interviews that should be done in qualitative research. The exact

numbers of respondents were in the end not showing to be that important but rather to remain

a high quality on each interview that was performed.

In contrast to quantitative methods, where a statistic sample most of the time is done before

beginning the study, the sample and statistic criteria in a qualitative study can change during

the process (Backman, 2008: 59). In line with this, the selection of the respondents explained

above was being done after the author had made observations for some weeks. Summarizing,

the most important part in the respondent selection was to make sure that the data gained from

the respondents was suitable to answering the research question. A table with the final

selection of respondents and the date and time of the interview is shown in Appendix 2.

4.5 Explanation of the interviews and the access problems

The two research methods; interviews and observations differ from each other and were in the

specific thesis complimenting each other in a very good way. First, the observations, tended in

practice to be very much a like a conversation and could be based on just a single or a few

questions that were asked very freely (Bryman and Bell, 2007: 474). This research method

was mainly used spontaneously when the author got the chance to talk to people within the

network. The semi-structured interviews on the other hand were shown to be more structured

and the researcher had a list of questions, or in other words an interview guide, with the

specific topics to discuss (Frost, 1997: 19). During the research process 7 qualitative

interviews were performed and these were also complimenting the empirical observations

since these kind of interviews are more focused and helped to address more specific issues

that can be seen in the bracelets when looking at the interview guide (Bryman and Bell, 2007:

479)

Bryman and Bell, (2007: 481) argues that interview is very much a two-way process and this

means that both parties are gaining something beneficial out of it. In line with this, in the

email sent to the participants (see Appendix 4), the author explained that the study will later

on be used of the Swedish Chamber for marketing and improvement processes and that their

contribution therefore will be beneficial for both the Swedish Chamber and the members.

Page 38: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

32

Interviews are often concerned with how the people are thinking, acting and feeling and in

this circumstance are it important to direct the discussion with the interview guide in mind

(Frost, 1997: 34). In this case is it important that the researcher is listening carefully and that

the questions are not seen as questioning from the interviewee’s point of view (Frost, 1997:

36). With this in mind, the author started the interview by introducing herself and the purpose

of the interview. This was followed by a small talk to gain a good connection and thereafter

the actually interview could start. Many of the interviews begun or were followed by a

“company visit” which allowed for a more relaxed conversion with the respondent and

enabled the author to develop an “overall feeling” of the organization. Which interviews that

included a company visit can be seen in Appendix 2.

Research also shows that the environment where the interview is hold also influences the

outcome of the interviews. As Frost (1997: 41-42) explains; it is important that the

environment is good for holding the interview. Furthermore, Frost explains a good

environment as a place without interruption and that the respondent is feeling as comfortable

as possible. All the interviews were carried out at the companies’ offices as this was seen as

most convenient for the respondents. The environment was most often quite and the

participants had taken time for attending the interviews. It happened very seldom, that the

respondents got interrupted and if it happened did they fast get back to the interview question.

The respondents were actively taking part in the interviews with long and elaborating answers

were they often gave concrete examples from their own experience of the network. The

respondents understood most of the questions easily and the author did not often have to

explain and repeat the question again.

4.6 Interview guide

Already during the development of the literature review the author started to think about

questions to include in the interview guide. The aims with these questions were to provide the

author with information to answering the research question addressed in the beginning of the

thesis. Since the author was carrying out semi-structured interviews and also empirical

observations the interview guide was also kept in the authors’ mind during the observations in

order to gain the right data needed for answering the research question.

The interview guide was conducted and structured with help of the “Social capital

framework”. The three dimensions; Structural, Relational and Cognitive - provided in the

beginning the headings for what questions to ask. However, the questions were all related to

the main purpose to answer the research questions. It is also important to mention that the

questions were in the reality not shown to be as structured as listed in the literature guide.

Further some of the questions gave information to more than one dimension. The interview

guide can be found in Appendix 3 and is structure under the following headings:

1. Background

2. The structural dimension

3. The cognitive dimension

4. The relational dimension

5. Added value

Page 39: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

33

Background: The background questions were important as they provide the context and elicit

mainly the structural dimension of social capital. Furthermore, the author also saw the aim

with the background to provide information about the already existing social capital within

the network. This was important data to add to the author’s empirical observations that had

been done during the first weeks at the chamber.

Structure: Additionally, under the structural dimension, questions were added in order to

identify more in detail how the relationship and ties between people were structured. The

questions asked provided information about the density, connectivity and hierarchy within the

network.

Relations: The questions under the relational dimension had the main aim to identify how the

relationship between the actors look like in the network therefore were questions about trust,

norms, obligations and identification asked. To also ask questions about specific shared

myths, stories and metaphors in the network were used to get a more precise and descriptions

rather than a general opinion.

Cognitive: The question about building a shared meaning was where the focus was under the

cognitive dimension as there can be value gained through learning and sharing meanings. In

order to gain answers about this was questions regarding topics such as shared codes,

language and narratives asked.

Benefit: Finally, interview questions under the last section were instead of asking directly

about the knowledge rather focusing on what people had learned from the other members of

the network. This provided an idea of what kind of value that was gained from the

relationships or in other words what new intellectual that was created. Overall the “Social

capital framework” was holistic enough to create an interview guide that could bring

knowledge to be able to answering the research question and this structure was also facilitated

the process of structuring the data and later on the analysis.

4.7 The process of empirical analysis

As, will be seen in the next chapter, transcripts and notes are raw data of research and cannot

provide explanations. Therefore, the author had to make sense of the collected data by sifting

and interpreting the collected material (Pope et al (2000: 114). The author started her

analytical process, in meantime as the data was collected. In the beginning, the empirical

observations and the secondary data were building the foundation of the analysis and that

answers from the interviews were used to build up the statements. This is called a sequential

or interim analysis and allows the researcher to go back and refine questions and pursue

emerging avenues of inquiry in further depth (Pope et al (2000: 114).

The step from the empirical observations and the empirical analysis is clearly shown as the

author firstly, in the empirical observations provided the data in a static way without showing

how the third party is actually influencing the process of network. Secondly, in the analysis

the data was analyzed from a process perspective were the contribution of the third party

gained the focus. The frame of reference helped to guide the analysis and the author has as far

Page 40: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

34

as possible tried to build up the opinions with theoretical as well as empirical theories. It is

impossible for the researcher to not add a particular perspective to the research objective

under the study. Nevertheless, the author has as far as possible tried to “let the text talk”

without putting in a meaning that is not there (Graneheim & Lundman, 2003: 106).

The relevant data for each category was identified through a process called comparison,

where each item was checked and compared with the rest of the data to establish analytical

categories (Pope et. Al, 2000: 114). Nevertheless, the author made sure that the theories were

not followed to strict and all tried to come up with her own explanation in order to give new

contribution to the research about the third party in the networking infrastructure. This

approach required a coherent and systematic approach from the author where the different

kinds of collected data were combined.

The author wanted to give all respondents equal space in the analysis and all interviewees

answers have therefore been taken into the analysis. When the empirical analysis had started

to gain shape, the last interviews were used to get additional data about aspects that were

unclear or not explored enough. This way of working gave the author a holistic view of the

case and she assumed when the seventh interview was done that she had enough data in order

to answer the problem statement.

The author decided to summarize the analysis in a table to give the reader of the thesis the

opportunity to easily see the evidence emerging from the analysis. Eisenhardt and Graebner

(2007: 29) state “A separate table that summarizes the evidence for each theoretical construct

is a particular effective way to present the case evidence”.

Page 41: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

35

Administration

(New and existing members)

Communication

(Website, newsletter,

invitations, social medias)

The mission and vission

Program

(Event: Social event and

professional events)

5. Empirical observations

In this chapter the empirical data collected during the author’s work at the Swedish Chamber

of Commerce will be presented. The data is structured under three sections: Background,

Participant observations and Qualitative interviews. The background will mainly include the

secondary sources that will bring the understanding of the network to the empirical analysis.

The second section will provide the data collected through the participant observations and

this process has progressed during the events and activities organized of the third party.

Finally, the third section will give the qualitative data with the respondents’ answers from the

interviews. The background will first be provided and the data in the following sections will

be divided into three dimensions of social capital: Network structure, Social dimension and

Cognitive dimension.

5.1 Introduction to the background

The background provides the reader of the thesis with an overview of the Swedish Chamber

and the necessary information to understand how the organization is structured to reach the

mission of the business network. The parts that will be explained are the overview of the

network, the mission, the administration, the program and the communication and media

strategy. The author will also introduce some of the terms used within the network that she

also will come back to in the following two sections. An overall structure of the network can

be seen in figure 4.

Figure 4, The structure of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

5.1.1 Overview of the network

The Swedish Chamber is an independent, non-profit networking organization founded in

1960. The organization is funded entirely by its members and the revenue is generated by

activities arranged by the Swedish Chamber. The Swedish Chamber is open for Swedish and

Page 42: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

36

Dutch companies in the Netherlands with a relation to Sweden, Swedish products or services.

Currently 157 company members are registered within the network ranged from multinational

companies to single entrepreneurs. Within the companies, the contact persons that most of the

time is attending the organized events, ranges from CEO to CFO, HR Manager, Market

Manager, Sales Manager or responsible persons for the business contacts with Sweden.

Next to the Swedish Chamber a Young Professional Club – Junior Chamber Club (JCC) was

established in 2006. JCC is open for Swedish persons in the aged 25-35 working in the

Netherlands or for Dutch persons in the same age working in a Swedish company or with

another relation to Sweden. Furthermore, JCC is led by a committee and has about 100

members (The Swedish Chamber of Commerce). The JCC has many things in common with

the Swedish Chamber but the structural, relational and cognitive dimensions are found to be

very different and would require its own study. As a consequence, the contribution of the

third party to JCC is not taken into consideration in this thesis.

5.1.2 The Mission

The Swedish Chamber differs from the Swedish Trade Councils as it does not work with

consultancy regarding trade issues related to import and export but rather serves as a network

organization (Swedish Trade 2010). More in detailed the mission with the network is to:

To provide a business and social platform and to facilitate business opportunities

within the network

To promote business between Sweden and the Netherlands and between the member

companies within the Swedish Chamber

Create and promote a Swedish - Dutch business network

Generate and maintain profitable business contacts for the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce (The Swedish Chamber of Commerce, 2011)

The member companies pay a yearly member fee depending on how many employees the

company has and is in return getting access to the Swedish-Dutch business network, the

Young Professional (JCC), the possibility to host events and they receive invitation to the

Swedish Chamber’s events and activities.

5. 1.3 The administration

The Swedish Chamber is run by a General Manger; policy and operational responsible for the

running of the organization and approximately 4-6 Swedish interns every year. The interns are

assisting with administrative issues and are also attending all the events. During the spring of

2011, one of the interns is assisting the General Manager in event managing, marketing, PR

and office administration as well as in the production of the digital newsletter and is also

keeping the website updated. The second intern is in charge of running the Junior Chamber

Club (JCC) including organizing events and taking care of the administration of the JCC.

Since the start 2006, has the Swedish Chamber invited 23 trainees to work at the office in

Amsterdam. The aim with the office is to reach out and serve the members in the best possible

way by arranging events, providing marketing opportunities and introduction to new business

contacts and opportunities.

Page 43: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

37

The Swedish Chamber is governed by the Boards of Directors supporting the business

network in various ways. The Board is elected by the members at the Annual General

Meeting. The Board exists of twelve members from some of the larger Swedish companies for

instance IKEA, SCA Packaging, Iggesund Paperboard, in the Netherlands and also some of

the Dutch member companies as Heussen and Rotterdam School of Management. The

Ambassador of Sweden in the Netherlands, Mr. Håkan Emsgård, is the honorary chair man of

the Board. The Swedish Chamber also includes a Board of Recommendation and five

honorary members that all have been a part of the business network for many years. The

Annual General Meeting (AGM) is held in April each year. During this meeting is the

information provided regarding the audited financial statement and an overview of the year's

events and the organization is also given in an annual report.

5.1.4 The Swedish Chamber of Commerce program

One way for the Swedish Chamber to reach out to their members and create and deepen

relationships is through the program with activities which includes professional and social

events. The Swedish Chamber’s aim with these activities is to offer its members an

opportunity to network with small, midsize and multinational companies from different

industries. Some of the events that are organized are networks luncheons with prominent key-

note speakers as well as seminars to exchange knowledge and experiences. Another event that

is coming back regularly is “Company presentation” where the member companies get the

chance to present their businesses. Also study visits are organized to different companies or

organization and once a year is a Study trip to various regions of Sweden are organized.

Additional to this, cultural and social events are held, for instance traditional Cray fish dinner,

Midsummer and Lucia celebration.

5.1.5 Communication and Media

To reach out with the information to the members a clear “Communication and Media

strategy” is defined by the Swedish Chamber’s management and Board and accomplished by

the manager. Today, the number of contact persons receiving invitations to the Swedish

Chamber’s events, news and information is around 300 persons. The members are informed

by different kinds of media mostly depending on the kind of information and event that is

addressed. The Swedish Chamber wants with the communication strategy to ensure that the

right target groups are reached with the accurate message. Experiences have shown that the

best way to acquire and maintain new contacts is through the members’ involvement in the

Swedish Chamber's networking events. These events also provide the members with an

opportunity to influence and increase their exposure in the network by attending, hosting or

sponsoring an event. The media used are the website, digital newsletter, digital or printed

newsletters and innvitions, an annual magazine and social media as Facebook and Linkedin

(The Swedish Chamber of Commerce Magazine 2010). Because of the fact that all these

media are used in different way will each media be explained separately in the following

section.

Page 44: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

38

1. Website

The current Swedish Chamber’s website (www.swedishchamber.nl) was launched in January

2009 and is used for keeping the members updated of all events and news of the Swedish

Chamber and to information about new and existing members. The website is also used for

keeping the members informed about other thing that is going on in the Netherlands that

people with connection to Sweden can be interested of. The website has a special section for

members with a log-in function. With help of this function is it possible to access to contact

information to the other members of the Swedish Chamber and to digital register for the

events. It´s also possible for the member companies to make advertisement or put other

information on the website which has many frequent visitors (The Swedish Chamber of

Commerce Magazine 2010).

2. The Swedish Chamber of Commerce Digital Newsletter

The Swedish Chamber’s digital newsletter: “Swe-News” is distributed to all company

members, contact persons, other Chambers in Sweden and worldwide about eight times a

year. The purpose with the newsletter is to gain interest for the Swedish Chamber’s website

with short articles in the newsletter and a direct link to the website for more information. This

method also increases the hits on the website which can be used for marketing purpose when

selling advertisement on the webpage. The newsletter also gives information about the new

members that have joined the network and the member companies have the possibility to

publish advertisement in “Swe-News” (The Swedish Chamber of Commerce Magazine 2010).

3. Invitations

As already mentioned, supposedly the most used way to acquire and maintain new contacts is

through the member’s involvement in the events. To provide information about these events

invitations to the Swedish Chamber´s and JCC events are sent digital and sometimes with a

printed support letter. The layout of the invitations is important and the information is

sometimes sent on colored or thicker paper to gain the members attention. Flayers with

invitations are also being handed out during the events to inform about the next or the

upcoming events (The Swedish Chamber of Commerce Magazine 2010).

4. Annual Magazine

Once a year, the Swedish Chamber’s magazine is published with news and interviews of the

member companies and the Swedish Chamber. The magazine is used both to inform new

possible members about the business network and its activities but also to keep the existing

members informed about the past events and the member activities. A member list were all

the companies are stated is also a part of the magazine and new member companies are

presented as well as the Patron companies. Additionally, some of the Managing Directors of

the member companies are interviewed about the latest trends. The entire magazine had for

2010 the theme “Innovation and sustainability” and was dedicated to the 50th

anniversary of

the Swedish Chamber. The magazine shows a touch of Sweden and the Swedish Chamber´s

work in the Netherlands (The Swedish Chamber of Commerce Magazine 2010).

Page 45: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

39

5. Linkedin and Facebook

For some years, Linkedin and Facebook are also used to keep the members informed about

the latest news and the events are announced through these media. The Linkedin group is

exclusively used for the members of the Swedish Chamber with about 100 members and the

Young professionals (JCC) has a Facebook group where almost everyone in JCC is a member.

The use of Social Medias for marketing purpose has just started and is going to be used more

frequently as a way to reach out to the members and to attract new members (The Swedish

Chamber of Commerce Magazine 2010).

5.2 Introduction to the participant observations

This section will provide the reader of the thesis with the participant observations. The

observations have been done through looking at the network from three dimensions: the

structural, the relational and the cognitive dimension. The author has as far as possible tried to

support her observations with examples that are observed from mainly watching the different

members within the network. As, already mentioned, the data will be presented under the

three headlines to facilitate the empirical analysis in the next section. Under each section are

also three or four theoretical terms used that have guided the collection of the data.

5.2.1 The Network Structure

1. Density

When taking a closer look at the network, there are 156 members to be found and about 261

contact persons registered within the network who all receives the information and invitations

that are sent from the Swedish Chamber. Approximately 70 % of these companies are

Swedish or have Swedish mother companies and 30 % are Dutch companies. The member

companies are located all over the Netherlands with the area around Amsterdam, Rotterdam

and The Hague as the predominantly areas. The smallest number of member companies is

located in the Northern part of the Netherlands. A few companies are also located in Belgium,

Sweden or in other European countries (The Swedish Chamber of Commerce). According to

the author’s observation, one group of members of the business network is attending the

events no matter of the geographically location of the events. The other members are taking

into consideration where the event is held and prefer some geographically locations better

than others. As the Swedish Chamber´s program shows, the organization tries to arrange

events at different geographically locations to provide the opportunity for everyone to attend

the arrangements.

When observing the business network it is obvious that the members get access to each other

through the events. The first contacts are created at the events and some companies are then

calling the office for more information or contact details. Even though the office is open and

possible to visit was it during the author’s time working for the network few people visiting

without notice and most of the meetings are booked in advance. When looking back at the

meetings held, it is clear that the Manager of the Swedish Chamber most often visit the

companies´ office to make it most convenient for the members of the business network.

Page 46: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

40

2. Hierarchy

The statistics shows, that in the Swedish Chamber most of the companies found are middle

sized and larger companies. At the moment, 15 of the members are ZZP companies2, these

were not allowed in the Swedish Chamber before but have now the possibility to sign up for a

membership with a reduced member fee. These companies are according to the author´s

observations foremost becoming a member with the aim to gain more Swedish business

contact or because they want to start to export to the Swedish market. Of the member

companies 29 of these are Patron companies, most of them larger multinationals, signifying

their support of the Swedish Chamber’s activities. For this group is a special program realized

often in co-operation with the Swedish Ambassador in the Netherlands. This group has

according to the General Manger, increased each year, since the patronship established in

2004. The authors observations shows that this group receives a lot of attention and there

logotypes are found on the Swedish Chamber’s banner, website and sometimes in other

advertisements. According to the author’s observations, the Patron companies are also

attending many of the events and are active in talking to other members and sharing their

experiences. Notable is also that most of the Patron companies are large international

companies with a Swedish mother company in common but most of the contacts persons that

are attending the events have a Dutch or other foreign background.

3. Connectivity

The network also includes the relationship with the other Nordic countries´ Business Clubs.

The General Managers of the Swedish, Danish and Finnish Chambers’ of Commerce have

meets twice a year where they keep each other updated about the latest news and the future

events. At least once a year, each of the Nordic Business Clubs should also arrange one event

to where they can invite the other countries members. The author of the thesis, was attending

one of the Nordic meetings with an open atmosphere where the wish to share the common

experience was easy to identify during the discussions. The Swedish Chamber has the most

active network when looking at the numbers of events organized each year and is the only

business network with its own office that is working full-time with supporting its members.

The same collaboration as between the Nordic countries is also seen between some of the

Swedish organizations in the Netherlands for instance between the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce, the Swedish Trade Council, the Swedish Embassy and Visit Sweden. The

Swedish organizations have in line with the Nordic Business Clubs meetings a few times

every year to share each other’s experience and the different agendas.

Even though the members explain, when the author has been asking them, that they appreciate

the business events more than the social events; the statistics show something else.

Information from the Swedish Chamber shows that the social events are the most popular

with the traditional Lucia Celebration as the most appreciated event with most people

attending. Most of the members are, according to the internal statistics from the Swedish

2 Dutch term for companies with only one employee

Page 47: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

41

Chamber, attending 1-2 events each year and almost 25 % are so active that they attend 3-5

events a year. Nevertheless, one fourth of the members are not attending any events and these

people are according to the General Manger not active at all. It is obvious according to the

authors observations that the members attending one event tend to also participate at the

following event.

5.2.2 The Relational Dimension

1. Trust

The relational dimension of the business network shows that the sharing of experience during

the events is very good and the interest for the other members’ knowledge and experience is

large. The author thinks that this was especially possible to observe at the events organized

with the purpose to create a discussion about a certain topic for instance “The Coach Pub” and

“Networking dinner”. These events have been structured more like seminars and workshops

where for instance during the Coach Pub the members got the chance to coach each other in a

structured way with help of a moderator. During the networking dinner was also a

presentation about network being a bridge to certain topics that were discussed and

experiences were shared about Social Medias and the benefit of Facebook. The participant

observations showed that the members were actively taking part in the discussions during

these events that also spontaneously continued after the end time. On these events, has the

Swedish Chamber tried to get a balance of more experienced people and younger people with

new insights. Additional emails with a remainder of the event were sent to some of the

members to receive this mix of people. The sharing of experience was made in a non-

competitive way and the discussion sometime got very deep. On the other hand, the sharing of

knowledge and experiences between the companies is true to a certain extend and the author

of the thesis has not managed to observe any concrete discussions about business co-

operation. Nevertheless, the author has heard from the members that when regular discussing

is turning into more serious plans, those are being discussed between fewer people and

outside the meeting platforms organized by the Swedish Chamber.

2. Obligations

The obligations are very high within the Swedish Chamber and it´s possible to observe a

constantly change of business cards. When asking the members if the members are keeping

their promises most of them agree that that this is true to a wide extend. The obligation from

the Swedish Chamber´s office to their members is also very high and the office is after each

event sending out the contact details to the members that have requested that information. The

obligations from the Swedish Chamber to the members are also maintained through that the

office makes sure that it always provides what states in the invitation. That the Swedish

Chamber’s finical and administrative obligations are fulfilled get approved by the Board and

also yearly at the Annual General Meeting. The General Manger is very open with the

information to her Board members and the transparency in the business network makes it

possible to recognize that the obligations are completed in the way that was decided.

Page 48: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

42

3. Norms

The transparency also characterizes the norms and attitudes within the business network.

More concrete, the norms are, from the authors observations, based on typical Swedish values

such as corporate social responsibility, Sustainability and Environmental thinking. These

values establish a strong foundation and the topics can be observed in the discussions during

the events. The observations during the author’s attendance in lunches and dinners shows that

the environment is most of the time formal influenced of the norms for how to run businesses.

Nevertheless, the discussions also include a touch of humor and self-reflection where the

members like to share their stories and happenings.

4. Identification

It is also clear that the identification to the Swedish Chamber is most obvious between the

Patron companies that have a certain relationship to each other and to the Swedish Chamber.

This close relationship can be seen as the patrons often relate and give examples about each

other during the discussions at the events. That the Patrons are identifying themselves with the

business network is also possible to see from their high attendance during the events were

they through the participation give priority to the Swedish Chamber. The author did not get

the chance to attend any of the events organized specific for the Patron companies but have

heard and understood through concrete examples from the events that the trust, norms,

obligations and identification between the members at these events are very strong.

The identification bringing the members together is also increasing on the social events such

as the Swedish traditional holidays as this are exclusive in this network and not possible to

experience in other network that not has Sweden as the common link. The fact that members

also bring their partner to these events creates a deeper relation and consequently also

increasing possibilities to identify with other members.

5.2.3 The Cognitive Dimension

1. Communication

The cognitive dimension was the most difficult dimension to observe in the Swedish Chamber

due to the wide ranch of members. The cognitive side of the members is also closely linked to

the personality and depends on which members were observed and in what kind of settings

the observations were carried out.

According to the author’s observations, the different native languages within the business

network were not seen as a problem as English most of the time is the used language. When

listings to the members’ discussions are many of them related to Sweden and this is often the

starting topic that later leads to other discussions. The cognitive dimension of the Swedish

Chamber also includes the communication between the Swedish Chamber and its members.

Page 49: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

43

At the moment, the approach that the office uses is mass communication where the Swedish

Chamber sends digital and paper invitations to all members registered on the invitation list.

The members also receive one or two reminder about the event the week before or the same

week as the event will be held. The other media used to reach the members of the Swedish

Chamber are described more in detailed under the section about the background. During the

author’s time in the Netherlands, did some members mention that the Swedish Chamber is

sending out too much information and this is not appreciated from all members because they

do not have time to read everything. Other member told the author that they do not like the

huge amount of paper used.

2. Shared codes

The author has paid a lot of attention to the culture differences when making the observations

of the Swedish Chamber. What the author found was that the cultural differences within the

network were not shown to be as big as the author would have thought and it was not possible

to observe that these influenced the business network in a specific way. On the other hand, the

culture differences are something that people like to discuss during dinners but are nothing

that can be seen as a barrier for the communication but rather something that brings the

members together within the network. When the author observed the culture of the network is

it clear that Sweden is the common link for the members and this is what is gaining the most

attention. The Swedish link includes shared code and many of the members were proud of the

Swedish connection and want to maintain their roots. The specific culture that is also a shared

code within the network is characterized by transparency as all members in their discussions

are open and willing to share the knowledge and experiences.

3. Narratives

Besides the shared language and codes within the network, the author has tried to see if the

members have any shared narratives such as myths, stories and metaphors that could

facilitates the process of networking. The first thing the author observed was that the Patron

members have some common myths and stories from their meetings that provide powerful

means such as experience from company visits that they have attended together. The second

thing the author observed was that the members joining the study trips to Sweden have also

more common stories and experiences from the study trips that bring the members together.

The observations done regarding the narratives are on the other hand just common for sub

group within the Swedish Chamber. When looking at the entire network, the author has

observed that the common narrative is also created through the members’ link to Sweden that

has been discussed under the section above. During the author’s internship at the Swedish

Chamber, it was easy to recognize that the traditional Lucia celebration is something that

almost all members has as a main narrative and this tradition is creating stories and

metaphors, about for instance the great Swedish food, that the members discuss during the

other events.

Page 50: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

44

6. Qualitative interviews

6.1 Introduction

In the final section the answers from the interviews are presented. The focus has been on the

respondents’ opinion of the business network. The answers will be presented separately under

each person’s name and company in order to keep them apart and highlight each person’s

opinion about the network. The qualitative interviews are following the same structure –

Network structure, Social dimension and Cognitive dimension - as the presentation of

findings from the participant observations and these headings can also be found in the

interview guide. Additionally, has also a section for improvement been added that will be

used later on for the secondary purpose of the thesis to provide suggestion for improvement to

the third party.

6.2 Interview BNConnect B.V, Mr. T.H.J Hoefman

The first interview was held with Mr. T.H.J Hoefman, CEO of BNConnect B.V, which is

providing new corporate energy services such as Led lamps. Mr. Hoefman became a member

of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce in 2008 and joined the network with the purpose to

gain more Swedish business contacts. Mr. Hoefman is an active member as well as a Patron3

of the Swedish Chamber and is attending a wide ranch of events each year.

1. The Network structure

Mr. Hoefman considers that the most important task of the Swedish Chamber’s office is to act

as a connecting factor between the members and to organize various business events where

the members can meet and share their experiences. These events are, according to Mr.

Hoefman most beneficial if they are organized in different settings and hold by companies

from different sectors and branches. In the near future, Mr. Hoefman would also like to

organize a company presentation of his own in order to create even more business

opportunities through the network. Mr. Hoefman own networking approach is to actively

search for new business contacts within the network

Mr. Hoefman thinks that the balance between smaller and larger companies within the

network is relatively good, but he also mentions that larger companies have more power than

smaller enterprises. He thinks that some of the smaller companies might be intimidated by the

prominent role of the multinational Patron companies. This could give the smaller companies

the feeling that their contribution is less important to the network. On the other hand, the fact

that Mr. Hoefman is the owner of a smaller company has not been a problem to him as he has

a lot of experience and competence from working with larger companies.

3 Companies supporting the Swedish Chamber of Commerce’s goals and activities

Page 51: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

45

Mr. Hoefman regards the fact that the Swedish Chamber is a non-profit organization as

something positive and this helps the Swedish Chamber to be neutral. Overall, he believes

that the Swedish Chamber is a successful independent outsider in the process of networking.

The fact that the Swedish Chamber managed to provide prominent keynote speakers such as

Mr. Victor Müller, CEO SAAB is adding value to the network. To Mr. Hoeffman social

events such as midsummer are of less importance but he realizes that those events are a good

way to create trust and a way to get to know each other under more informal circumstance. He

has participated in various study trips to Sweden organized by the Swedish Chamber and

explains that these trips create excellent possibilities to meet new business contacts and to

exchange mutual business experiences. The informal atmosphere characterizing these trips in

combination with business presentations is also something that Mr. Hoefman believes

describes the Swedish Chamber of Commerce very well.

2. The Relational dimension

According to Mr. Hoefman, the Swedish Chamber offers a transparent business culture which

explains the nice atmosphere within the network where people can exchange business

experiences and create new business opportunities. He also mentioned that a strong point in

the Swedish Chamber of Commerce network structure, compare to other business networks, is

that the members are not only creating business contact but they also build a genuine social

network. Mr. Hoefman does not see any competition between the companies in the network

and think that the reason for this is that most of the companies are active in different

industries. The only competition he could think of within the network might be found between

companies such as SAAB and Volvo that are competing in the same branch.

3. The Cognitive dimension

A binding factor within the network is that all members have a business connection to

Sweden. According to Mr. Hoefman this is very important and brings the members closer

together. This is also the reason why the business culture differences between the companies

within the network are much smaller compared to outside the network. When asking Mr.

Hoefman what he thinks about the possibility to share and exchange experiences within the

network, he thinks there is room for improvement. In his view it’s of course a matter of

communication and trust. Mr. Hoefman believes in a transparent network organization

without hierarchy where you meet regularly gives the most value for everyone.

4. Improvement

When asking about how the Swedish Chamber can improve, their services for their members,

Mr. Hoefman has a clear answer and says: “The Swedish Chamber could fulfill a role as an

intermediary between the government and co-operate companies”. As it is today, there is a big

gap between the government and the cooperate companies and according to Mr. Hoefman this

causes unnecessary problems. Another though from Mr. Hoefman was that the member

companies of the Swedish Chamber could co-operate in creating a platform for social

responsibility and support for instance charity organizations or to share knowledge about

sustainability.

Page 52: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

46

6.3 Interview Inter IKEA Systems B.V, Mr. Ehsan Turabaz

The second interview was held with Mr. Ehsan Turabaz, Manager International Sales

Department Inter IKEA Systems B.V in Delft. Inter IKEA Systems B.V has been a member of

the Swedish Chamber of Commerce since many years. Mr. Turabaz is an active member and

according to him the membership is important to maintain the Swedish roots. Mr. Turabaz

believes in the importance of networking and personally he is connected to 22 different

organizations.

1. The Network structure

Mr. Turabaz complements the organization of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce and

according to him the office most important task is to organize events. In important task is to

attract prominent high level key note speakers from politic and industrial fields. Additionally,

Mr. Turabaz is very enthusiastic and impressed that the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

Board of Recommendations includes: Mr. Jeroen van der Veer (Chairman of the Board of

ING and Philips and non-executive director at Shell), Mr. Michael Treschow (Chairman of

the Board of Unilever and Ericsson) and Mr. Björn Skala (Former Ambassador of Sweden in

the Netherlands and finds most beneficial for this kind of business network organization.

Above all, Mr. Turabaz is positive to the social events that the Swedish Chamber organizes

such as the traditional Swedish Lucia celebration. These kinds of social events give the

members the chance to meet and get to know each other under informal circumstances which

is beneficial both for both business and pleasure. Mr. Turabaz for himself does not need the

Swedish Chamber of Commerce directly for business reasons but to maintain the Swedish

roots and this is also a way to promote the IKEA brand and according to him also other

companies are joining the Swedish Chamber because of the same reason.

When asking Mr. Turabaz about the balance regarding the mix of the sizes of the member

companies, he is satisfied with the spread and explains that the Swedish Chamber includes

both larger international, middle size and small companies and these are all complements each

other in a good way. He explains that he also, as a representative from a large international

company, has a responsibility to help and support smaller companies. Networking is

according to Mr. Turabaz about give and share experiences. Mr. Turabaz believes that the fact

that Swedish Chamber of Commerce is a non-profit organization also adds value and helps

the Swedish Chamber to be independent.

2. The Relational dimension

From Mr. Turabaz point of view, the Swedish Chamber is a transparent and open business

network which makes the members enthusiastic to support the network. Mr. Turabaz also

points out that the members, when joining the Swedish Chamber, know what they get; the

invoice is sent before the event and the invitation clearly shows what is included in the price.

Mr. Turabaz finds the Swedish Chamber a non-hierarchic organization with very easy access

to all the members and board members and a very nice atmosphere. This is also significant for

the office, where the General Manger Ms. Gerlagh as a network coordinator of the Swedish

Page 53: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

47

Chamber makes a great job also in managing the trainees who are very open and welcoming

as well. The informal and friendly approach by the office is also something that Mr. Turabaz

appreciates.

3. The Cognitive dimension

Mr. Turabaz explains that the common focus of the members of the Swedish Chamber is

Sweden, which provides the members with a mutual identity. When asking about the culture

differences, Mr. Turabaz does not recognize any, all though the member companies are of

different nationalities. He would not have seen them as a problem anyway as the members

have a mutual business focus. During the interview, Mr. Turabaz makes several comparisons

with the Swedish Chamber and the IKEA organization and the importance that both have

Swedish business focus: “the Swedishness”. To promote the “Swedishness’ is adding value to

both the Swedish Chamber and to the IKEA organization. When it comes to sharing

information and exchange experiences within the network, Mr. Turabaz thinks it’s a question

of trust and always depends on the personal contact. In Mr. Turabaz opinion, the atmosphere

within the Swedish Chamber business network encourages to open relations and to share

information.

4. Improvement

When asking about how the Swedish Chamber could improve their services for their

members, Mr. Turabaz points out that according to his opinion, the Swedish organizations in

the Netherlands should all benefit from an increased co-operation, and this will add an even

higher value to the network. In the current situation, Mr. Turabaz thinks that the different

organizations operate too much separately which leads to a waste of resources. In line with

this, he would also like to see a closer co-operation between the Nordic countries since this

would extend the network with new contacts.

Additionally, according to Mr. Turabaz too many activities are organized each year and the

members do not have the time to attend them all. Instead, Mr. Turabaz would like to suggest

to the Swedish Chamber of Commerce to organize fewer events, for instance six per year to

increase the quality even more. He is also suggesting that the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

conduct a member survey in end of each year to ask the members about the opinion of the

events and the job being done during the last year. Mr. Turabaz also believes that this will

increase the commitment of the members even more and give them a possibility to influence

and improve the quality of the Swedish Chamber.

6.4 Interview Iggesund Paperboard, Mrs. Ann-Charlotte Runn

The third interview is held with Mrs. Ann-Charlotte Runn Manger Human Resource Iggesund

Paperboard. In addition, Mrs. Runn is Vice Chairman of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

Board of Directors. Mrs. Runn is an active member since 2004 and sees the possibility of

sharing and sharing of knowledge and experience as the main benefit of the membership.

Page 54: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

48

1. The Network structure

According to Mrs. Runn, the most important task of the Swedish Chamber is to create a

business platform where people can meet and exchange knowledge and experiences. The most

beneficial events to facilitate this exchange are the business events, according to Mrs. Runn.

In Mrs. Runn´s opinion it is important to keep the focus within the network on business. In

line with this, she thinks that the study visits where the members are invited to a company to

see the operational side is much valuated. To gain insights about how other companies handle

things as logistics and their HR is something that Mrs. Runn thinks is interesting and inspiring

and therefore would like to see more of those.

When asking about the spread between the different sizes of the member companies Mrs.

Runn is very satisfied: “It is a good spread and the fact that we also have almost all the larger

Swedish companies as members of the Swedish Chamber is very impressing”. The smaller

companies are also adding value to the network and are from her opinion more willing to co-

operate. Mrs. Runn considers the Swedish Chamber’s office position as objective in the

process of networking and it is not influencing the members in a certain way when asking for

business advice or connections.

2. The Relational dimension

When asking Mrs. Runn about what kind of contacts that can be received through the network

her answer is business contacts. Furthermore, according to Mrs. Runn the Swedish Chamber

offers the unique opportunity to share branch experiences without any competition.

Personally, she values the possibility to meet with competitors in very informal way and to

discuss issues which are on everyone agenda. According to Mrs. Runn this transparency and

cooperation make the Swedish Chamber different from other business networks. She

continues with concluding that the Swedish Chamber business network is very flat and she

does not see any hierarchy on the contrary all the member companies have the same power

and the same possibility to influence the network.

It is the link to Sweden and the interest of improving their business that the members have in

common and the culture differences is not a problem. The Swedish and Dutch culture is very

similar and all members of the network have the same focus. The only differences she can

think of is the fact that Dutch people in generally are more directly in their approach and

business always comes first and the part to get to know each other during a “fika”4 is coming

later.

Mrs. Runn meets other members of the business network at the events she also believes in the

importance of maintain the relations and she is doing this by phone calls and emails. Overall,

the level of trust and sharing of knowledge is very high within the network a reason for this

could be that the Swedish Chamber is a non-profit organization and not an industry or a

competitor. Mrs. Runn is also active in the Swedish Church in the Netherlands and always

receives a positive support from the member when discussing church matters. However, to

maintain this trust and sharing of information, Mrs. Runn points out the importance of

4 The Swedish word for coffee break

Page 55: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

49

keeping your commitments and networking is all about giving and taking and to support each

other. Furthermore, she thinks that the members of the Swedish Chamber are very pro-active

and explains that there are no members waiting to get “fed” within the Swedish Chamber.

3.The Cognitive dimension

Mrs. Runn enjoys the process of networking and believes that the communication is “priority

one“ to be successful. Therefore, to stay connected is the only way to remain the contacts and

to avoid losing your relation. Mrs. Runn is trigged of the interaction within the network and

that one thing often leads to another.

Mrs. Runn believes that the business contacts achieved from the Swedish Chamber are above

all beneficial for Iggesund Paperboard and not just for her personally. When summarizing the

value that the Swedish Chamber is adding to the members the main thing is the opportunities

created to meet prominent Swedish and international business leaders and representatives

from the politics. This gives Mrs. Runn and other members a unique opportunity to meet and

greet with for instance Mr. Victor Müller, Mr. Michael Treschow and even the Crown

Princess of Sweden.

3. Improvement

When asking about how the Swedish Chamber can improve, their services for their members,

even more, Mrs. Runn thinks that by increasing the number of member companies the value

of the network would also increase as well as the business opportunities. However, it’s

important that the network is not becoming too big. Another important factor is circulation

and the possibility to meet new people and get new ideas. Mrs. Runn believes that the

members are satisfied with the Swedish Chamber and she thinks it is unique that she has not

yet received a single negative reaction from any of the members about their membership.

Some members that have cancelled their membership have mostly done so because of the

economic situation in the company and not because they were unsatisfied with the network.

6.5 Interview SCA Packaging de Hoop, Mr. Henk Lingbeek

The fourth interview was held with Mr. Henk Lingbeek Managing Director SCA Packaging de

Hoop at their factory in Eerbeek. The visit also included a factory tour of one of the world’s

larger paper mills. Mr. Lingbeek became a member of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

about seven years ago and is attending approximately 3-4 events each year. Mr. Lingbeek

was asked to join the Board of Directors of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce by the

previous Chairman to represent SCA with activities in The Netherlands on different business

sectors. 1. The Network structure

Mr. Lingbeek believes that the main reason to become a member of the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce is because of the business network possibilities. The main task of the Swedish

Chamber’s office is to successfully offer the members a platform for these network

possibilities. The Managing director of the Swedish Chamber: Ms. Gerlagh is a master in this

Page 56: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

50

process, according to Mr. Lingbeek. The events that Mr. Lingbeek sees as most beneficial are

the events are the business related events with a clear link to Sweden. The events that are

arranged for the members of the Swedish Chamber by the Swedish Ambassador in the

Netherlands and the co-operation with key note speakers from the Dutch government and

senior business managers are very valuable to support business activities between companies

in Sweden and The Netherlands.

When asking about the balance between the sizes of the member companies within the

network Mr. Lingbeek concludes that this is quite good. Many of the larger Swedish

companies are represented and many international companies as well. Furthermore, he thinks

that it is an advantage that a good balance exists between small companies and ZZPs and

larger companies. In many other business networks this balance between large sized

companies, consultants and ZZP-ers is not correct, but is nothing that Mr. Lingbeek has

experienced in the Swedish Chamber so far.

Mr. Lingbeek finds the question about how the fact that the Swedish Chamber is a non-profit

organization influences the network difficult. When turning the question around, he assumes

that if it was a profit-driven organization, it would have been more difficult for the larger

companies to explain why they should become a member. In the current situation, the

Swedish Chamber can be seen as a very neutral organization and brings business contacts

together without any strings.

2. The Relational dimension

Mr. Lingbeek has a wide experience of networking and is involved in many organizations and

he is also member of the Dutch Paper industry federation and acts as chairman of a midsized

Competence centre focusing on innovation and R&D. Mr. Lingbeek achieves new business

contacts by attending different events and is maintaining them through phone calls and e-

mails. In the process of networking, Mr. Lingbeek mentions as an example the possibility to

invite the members to your own company for a study visit or a company presentation.

Mr. Lingbeek is in fact planning to invite the Young Professionals of the Swedish Chamber

to a company presentation next fall. He believes that this would be a beneficial interchange

for both the Young professionals, SCA and specifically SCA Packaging de Hoop. This would

give the SCA/SCA Packaging de Hoop the possibility to meet new potential employees and

provide the company with new ideas and in return give the Young professionals the

knowledge and experience about a world leading company in the paper industry. The senior

members have already been invited a number of years ago to a very successful presentation at

the SCA Packing de Hoop. Mr. Lingbeek has mainly received business contacts through the

SCoC-network but has also made some new friends that he also meets privately.

3. The Cognitive dimension

Mr. Lingbeek sees the relation to Sweden as the common factor of the members of the

Swedish Chamber but h does not recognize any culture differences between Dutch- or

Page 57: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

51

Swedish memers. Mr. Lingbeek thinks that the transparency within the Swedish Chamber is

very high and especially between the Patron companies were various issues of common

interest has been discussed very openly at more than one occasion. Overall, the members of

the network are very keen to share experiences without fear of competition, according to Mr.

Lingbeek this is due to the high and professional level of the members. As an example he

mentions that the members exchanged experiences during the economic crisis. One reason

why this is working so well is because the members have a similar business culture and the

same approach about sharing knowledge and this also helps to create trust. Another important

benefit for the members is that the Swedish Chamber promotes all member companies and

everyone has the same power and access to the business network. Mr. Lingbeek believes that

SCA Packaging de Hoop benefits from being a member but is also for him personally he finds

it fun and supporting his personal development.

4. Improvement

When asking about how the Swedish Chamber of Commerce can improve to serve their

members better is the answer that it would be beneficial if more members would actively take

part in the network. How to solve this problem has been discussed many times at the Swedish

Chamber board meetings Mr. Lingbeek find for instance that the study trips to Sweden brings

the participant members closer to each other and more committed to the Swedish Chamber

activities. An excellent program with well-known and interesting key note speaker is also

something that brings added value to the network and more members to the events. Mr.

Lingbeek also finds the office in Amsterdam too small and even though the office is doing a

fantastic job with the available resources Mr. Lingbeek would like to suggest an increase of

personnel. Ms. Gerlagh is doing a terrific job for the Swedish Chamber but the organization is

also very vulnerable with just one employee in case something would happen.

6.6 Interview Heussen, Mr. Nils van Dijkman and Mrs. Stina Lindmark

The forth interview was held with Mr. Nils van Dijkman partner/owner and Mrs. Stina

Lindmark attorney-at-law at Heussen attorneys. The Dutch law firm Heussen, has been a

member of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce since 2005 but both Mr. Van Dijkman and

Mrs. Lindmark were members of the Swedish Chamber also through their former employers.

Mr. Van Dijkman is the Chairman of the Board since 2008, and attends almost all the events

organized by the business network.

1. The Network structure

Mr. Van Dijkman and Mrs. Lindmark consider the business opportunities offered from the

network as the main reason to become a member of the Swedish Chamber. Mrs. Lindmark

thinks that the office´s most important role is to act as a central point and support the

members within the business network. She explains further that Ms. Gerlagh knows who is

who in the Netherlands and can always identify whom to contact for a certain reason.

Page 58: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

52

Mr. Van Dijkman and Mrs. Lindmark think that all kinds of events that the Swedish Chamber

organizes are important but Mr. Van Dijkman highlights the events with the Swedish keynote

speakers. The value is created by the opportunity to listen to the experience and direct insights

from Swedish businesses. He explains that the contacts achieved from the business network

are both business and social contacts. According to Mr. Van Dijkman, when it comes to

networking it is necessary to contribute before the benefits appears and the members have to

be active in order to benefit from the network.

Both Mr. Van Dijkman and Mrs. Lindmark are satisfied with the mix of large and small

companies in the network and according to Mr. Van Dijkman, all the larger Swedish

companies are involved in the Swedish Chamber. The large and the small companies can

create value together by sharing their contacts and experiences. In line with this, none of the

respondents can see a hierarchy in the Swedish Chamber other than the formal hierarchy with

the Board of executives. Mr. Van Dijkman explains that it had been a disaster if the Swedish

Chamber of Commerce had been a profit organization. The current situation offers benefits to

the members and the Swedish Chamber is not there to gain own benefits but to serve others.

Mr. Van Dijkman believes that a profit seeking organization could create an undesirable

competition between the companies within the network.

2. The Relational dimension

When asking what the mutual factors are for the members of the network, both respondents

mentioned the interest for Sweden and an informal atmosphere. Mr. Van Dijkman and Mrs.

Lindmark both agree when looking into the network that no visible culture difference can be

found. On the other hand, Mrs. Lindmark recognizes the differences business wise and this is

due to the fact that Dutch people are from a historical perspective, more use to trading. From

her opinion the Swedish people are more trustable in negotiations. However, these differences

cannot be found in the Swedish Chamber. Mr. Van Dijkman develops this thoughts further by

explaining that the reason for this might be that there are no typical Swedish or Dutch people

involved in the network but according to him the members meets somewhere in the middle.

The different native languages cannot either be seen as a problem, but Mr. Van Dijkman

appreciates that Swedish is still the used language in the network. The sharing of knowledge

is also facilitated by the fact that the network is transparent with outgoing members that want

to share their knowledge and experience to others. On the other hand, Mr. Van Dijkman and

Mrs. Lindmark believe that a competition between some of the companies can be found in the

network but this is nothing that is affecting the business network negatively.

3. The Cognitive dimension

Mrs. Lindmark believes that it is the fantastic group of people in the Swedish Chamber that

helps to create the nice environment within the network. Also the organization behind the

Swedish Chamber has a responsibility in creating the trust and this can be done through

consistence that is created through keeping the promises. Mr. Van Dijkman explains that the

members are proud of their network and especially the excellent events organized during last

year. The members of the Swedish Chamber like to share and talk about their great

experiences from the events and the business network´s good reputation is spread also to

Page 59: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

53

people outside the network. Mrs. Lindmark states that the distance to Sweden is decreasing

through the Swedish Chamber and this is beneficial for the members that will remain in

contact with their home country.

4. Improvement

Finally, when discussing how the Swedish Chamber can improve, the first thing that Mr. Van

Dijkman states is that it would benefit from getting more members to the events. Another

thing would be to work more creative and for instance use the Social Medias in a better way.

Mr. Van Dijkman and Mrs. Lindmark agree that the main improvement would be to co-

operate closer with the Young Professionals (JCC). Today the groups are separated and a

natural way to solve this problem would be to encourage the Young Professionals to become

members of the Swedish Chamber when they are passing the age limit for the membership in

JCC. Mr. Van Dijkman explains that events like “speed dating” and “coach pub” also create

opportunities for the members to meet and share experiences. It is through these events

possible to recognize the value that the members, from different age groups, can bring to each

and contribute to each other’s network.

6.7 Interview, MummyMug B.V Cecilia Thorfinn

The sixth interview was held with the founder and Managing director Mrs. Cecilia Thorfinn,

owner of MummyMug B.V. Her company offers a hot drink solution that ensures safer

environment for children. Mrs. Thorfinn received an invitation to become a member of the

Swedish Chamber of Commerce, after having published an article in “Svenska klubbens”

newspaper, attending her that the Swedish Chamber is welcoming ZZPs into the business

network.

1. The Network structure

Mrs. Thorfinn appreciates the recognition of ZZP companies and the action taken of the

Swedish Chamber to give the opportunity to the ZZP companies to become a member of the

business network. Mrs. Thorfinn thinks that the main benefit created from the membership is

the possibility to get inspiration and contact with other business people. Mrs. Thorfinn gets

access to the other members at the event. She explains further that she at every event meets

new people and finds it very positive that new ideas constantly are brought in to the network.

The entrepreneur likes all kinds of events but highlights the company presentations and

certainly last year’s Gala dinner with the Crown Princess of Sweden. As an owner of a small

business, she finds it useful to attend company presentation such as Loyens & Loeff seminar

about the latest update on fiscal and corporate law developments. It had been too expensive to

attend these meetings without the Swedish Chamber and therefore not possible for a small

businesses.

Mrs. Thorfinn is satisfied with the spread of the different sizes of the companies in the

Swedish Chamber and finds the larger companies important for the financing of the business

network. Mr. Thorfinn does not observe a certain hierarchy in the network and states that it

might be there but it is nothing that she has experienced. She is impressed of the great interest

Page 60: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

54

and encouragement that are shown from larger companies and explains that a reason might be

that other members also dream about having their own business. According to Mrs. Thorfinn,

the Swedish Chamber facilities a platform for exchange of contacts but very independent and

does not influence the members to think in a certain way as other organizations might do.

Mrs. Thorfinn thinks it is obvious that the Swedish Chamber should be a nonprofit

organization as the aim should be a create contacts and not to create profit.

2. The Relational dimension

MummyMug B.V is still in the startup phase and her product is not yet fully developed.

Therefore, Mrs. Thorfinn explains that she does not do as much networking as would be

possible. Nevertheless, she believes that the business network later on can help her to

distribute the product. In line with this, the entrepreneur thinks that the business network is

most beneficial if the business is established and has already developed its product or service.

Mrs. Thorfinn finds the social events nice but has unfortunately not had the possibility to

attend that many as there is other events organized at the same time from other Swedish

organizations. Mrs. Thorfinn would in the future like to attend the study trip to Sweden as she

believes that this kind of arrangement give the members a special connection to each other

and also the opportunity to create business contacts in Sweden. She believes that there are

most often long-term relationships built within the network and thinks that the Swedish

Chamber is more established and is showing a more long term perspective than some of the

other Swedish organizations in the Netherlands.

3. The Cognitive dimension

According to Mrs. Thorfinn, the connecting factor for members in the business organization is

the connection to Sweden and the fact that the members are proud of their roots. According to

her it is not possible to recognize any direct culture differences within the business network.

Mrs. Thorfinn, does most of the time, use all three of her languages depending on what person

she is speaking to and believes that the different languages spoken in the network cannot be

seen as a problem. She thinks it is good that the presentations are held in English and sees it

overall very natural that all languages are used. In comparison to for instance the Swedish

choir where she likes that everything is in Swedish is it not as important in the business

network as the environment is more international.

The motivation to share experience is very high and she explains a genuine dialogue where

people are nice and friendly to each other but she has not observed any concrete discussions

about business agreements. She also states that the members are careful what they are sharing

and it would according to her be stupid to share everything.

4. Improvement

When asking about how the Swedish Chamber can improve, their services for their members,

does Mrs. Thorfinn’s suggests a mentorship between small and larger companies. This would

not just be beneficial for the smaller companies but also for the mangers from larger

companies. She believes that this kind of exchange would not just give financial benefit but

Page 61: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

55

people would also get a kick from contributing to others. Furthermore, a mentorship could

also clear the gap between the smaller and the larger companies.

Another suggestion from Mrs. Thorfinn would be to provide an event where the smaller

companies get the chance to explain and pitch themselves for the other member companies.

Finally, according to Mrs. Thorfinn the Swedish Chamber has a clear profile that they should

remain but the social events should be done in cooperation with the other Swedish

organizations such as Svenska klubben, Svenska kyrkan and Svenska-Holländska Föreningen.

6.8 Interview, Swedish Trade Council, Mr. Andreas Rentner

The last interview was held with Mr. Andreas Renter, Trade Commissioner at the Swedish

Trade Council in the Netherlands. The Swedish Trade is a member company of the Swedish

Chamber of Commerce and a close partner when facilitating the interchange between Sweden

and the Netherlands and Sweden promotion. Mr. Rentner represents the Swedish Trade since

2007 and attends the Swedish Chamber’s Board meeting as a special invitee as well as some

events every year.

1. The Network Structure

Mr. Renter thinks that the main reason to become a member of the Swedish Chamber is

because of the exchange of experience that is created through networking. The Swedish

Chamber´s role in the process of networking is to ensure that the events provide a high quality

to the members. According to Mr. Rentner, this is mainly done by offering good speakers and

constant exchange possibilities of new knowledge. During the events, it is also vital that

recent topics are discussed as the possibility to gain new information attracts the members to

the events. Mr. Renter appreciates the business events most. The value received depends on

the business topic, and not on the kind of people attending. He believes that both the business

events and the social events are important and according to him, both businesses oriented and

social relation are created through the business network. Mr. Renter explains that the Swedish

Chamber provides him with recommendations of possible companies for co-operation and this

sometimes turns in to new business opportunities.

Mr. Rentner is satisfied with the mix of the sizes of the companies within the Swedish

Chamber. Nevertheless, he points out that it is easier to recognize the larger companies and

especially the Patron companies as they receive the most publicity and have the best financial

capacities. On the other hand, the smaller companies can bring in other questions to the

business network and are therefore important for the Swedish Chamber as well. The smaller

companies can also become new client to the Swedish Trade. Overall, Mr. Rentner thinks that

the business network shows continuality and a long-term perspective and many of the

members of the network are very loyal and have been members for a long time. Mr. Rentner,

does not see a certain hierarchy within the Swedish Chamber, but states that the board

includes only larger company and this can bring a certain hierarchy to the business network.

The fact, that the Swedish Chamber is a non-profit organization is something that he

appreciates and makes the network work for covering the costs rather than for making a high

profit.

Page 62: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

56

2. The Relational dimension

Mr. Rentner gets access to the other people at the events and meeting but receives also new

contacts through dialog with Ms. Gerlagh. He thinks that the cooperation between the

Swedish Chamber and the Swedish Trade is very good but could also improve, and this could

create benefit to both organizations. The motivation for sharing of knowledge is high and

shows transparency where the exchange is both about giving and taking. According to Mr.

Rentner, the trust perceived from the members to the Swedish Chamber is easy to recognize

and this is created through the well-organized structure. The business network fulfills the

agreements by sending information early and this also creates trust. Mr. Rentner summarizes

that the trust is received through a long-term perspective, continuity, interesting presentations

and he thinks that the Swedish Chamber has succeeded with all this. The business network

has learnt to stick to the popular event but also tries to improve.

3. The Cognitive dimension

Mr. Renter thinks that the factor that brings the members of the network together is the

“Swedishness” that can be seen as the foundation of the Swedish Chamber. He explains that

the SCC has been able to merge the Dutcheness into Swedisness, or the other way around, in a

good way. Mr. Rentner thinks that the office has a main part in this success and Ms. Gerlagh

is doing a great job and involves the right people that are representing the business network

very well. Mr. Rentner cannot come up with and specific culture differences within the

network and that there are different languages spoken cannot either be seen as a barrier.

Overall, Mr. Renter explains that the Swedish and Dutch people are always working pretty

well together. The members of the network openly share their experiences and the Swedish

identity is clear when looking at many of the members. Mr. Rentner believes that the Swedish

identity creates a feeling of belonging and/or security for many members and is a good way

for the members not to cut all the bands to Sweden.

4. Improvement

Mr. Rentner finds it rather difficult to say how the Swedish Chamber could improve to serve

their member better but one way might be through working narrower and for instance make

direct investments to some groups of members.

As, every network, the Swedish Chamber could also create a higher value through new

members, and he explains that Swedish Trade uses “success case” that can be used when

trying to get new members to the business network. He believes also that the Swedish

Chamber and the Swedish Trade could cooperate in the work to attract new members.

Overall, to maintain the close cooperation between the Swedish organizations and to focus on

interesting issues together is important. Mr. Rentner explains that the Swedish Chamber could

add value to the Dutch companies through bridge the culture differences between the two

nationalities. The business network could also bridge the gap between the smaller and larger

companies through working with more matchmaking between the member companies.

Page 63: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

57

•The Network Structure of the third party•Density

•Diversity

•Connectivity

1. Access to parties for combinding and exchanging

intellectual capital

•The Relational Dimension of the third party •Trust

•Norms

•Obligations

•Identification

2. Motivation to combine and exchange intellectual capital

•The Cognitive Dimension of the third party•Communication

•Shared codes

•Narratives

3. Anticipation of value through combinding and

exchanging inteelctual capital

7. Empirical analysis

7.1 Introduction

In this chapter, the author of the thesis collected data will be analyzed with the aim to

investigate the contribution of third party´s within the network infrastructure. For this

purpose, the author´s frame of reference will be used to give guidance through the analysis.

The analysis will be based on the author’s interpretation of her participant observations, the

qualitative interviews and the secondary sources of data from the time worked for the

Swedish Chamber of Commerce.

In the previous chapter, each dimension of social capital was discussed separately but will

now be consider from the process of combination and exchange and the focus will be on the

third party’s contribution in the creation of intellectual capital. Nahapiet and Ghoshal, (1998:

250) explain that social intellectual capital is created mainly through two processes;

combination and exchange and the relationship built through them are the foundation for

social capital. This will now be considered, from the perspective of the third party, with the

purpose to answer the addressed research question. Nahapiet and Ghosal (1998) study has a

theoretical contribution but the author of this thesis will now give new insight to the research

about a third party by examine how this works in reality. More specific, as seen in figure 5 the

dimension of “The network structure” is linked to the third parties capability to access parties

for combination and exchanging intellectual capital. “The relation dimension” is mainly

supporting the third parties in creating motivation to combine and exchange intellectual

capital. Lastly, “The cognitive dimension” facilitates the anticipation of value through

combining and exchanging intellectual capital. Finally, to fulfill the second purpose of the

thesis the author is in the last section providing her suggestion for improvement to the

examined case. As the processes are all linked to the combination capabilities of the third

party, this is discussed in the last section of the chapter. The empirical analysis is summarized

in table 1 and the third parties most important characteristics are stated and these will be

explained further in this chapter.

Figure 5. Shows how the dimensions of social capital turn into processes

4. The Combination Capability of the Third Party

Page 64: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

58

Table 1, How the contribution of the third party is provided in the network infrastructure

Social capital Combination and exchange of intellectual capital Intellectual capital

New

intellectual

capital

created

through

combination

and

exchange

The Network structure of the third

party

1. Access to parties for combining and exchanging

intellectual capital

Density Relations created built upon both strong and weak ties, Transparency,

Neutral role of third party, A Special relation to the Patrons

Diversity Diversity of the companies regarding size and geographically location,

Flat hierarchy, Spread of power, Third party acts as a hub

Connectivity Facilities the possibilities for the members to meet through event,

Connect people to each other and then “pulls back”, Social events

connects people to each other

The Relational dimension of the third

party

2. Motivation to combine and exchange intellectual

capital

Trust High on trust, the members know what they get in advance, Non-profit

organization helps, Non- competitive relations, Giving and taking

Norms Typical Swedish norms, Based on values such as sustainability, CSR and

environmental thinking, Create the strong foundation

Obligations Giving and taking, Constant interchange, Transparency, Keep promises

Identification Created through the link to Sweden and the traditions, i.e. the Lucia

celebration, obvious between the Patrons

The Cognitive dimension of the third

party

3. Anticipation of value through combining and

exchanging intellectual capital

Communication No cultural difference, similar language, mass communication, In

formal communication, Friendly atmosphere

Shared codes The link to Sweden, Traditions, The Lucia celebration, Social events

Narratives The link to Sweden, Previous events, Business experiences , The study

trip and Patron dinners creates common stories

Improvements of the third party

4. The combination capability

-Bridge the gap between the government, other Swedish organizations and the members - New and more active members -Closer co-operation between the Swe-Cham and the Young professionals -Combining the physical and technical network -Sending out a member survey

Page 65: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

59

Summary:

The data collected shows that the Swedish Chamber of Commerce provides an attractive

platform where the members of the network can meet to combine and exchange their

knowledge and experiences in the creation of new intellectual capital. The third party has

succeeded through taking the role of an organizer that provides the platform for networking.

As the author’s observations of the network show, the third party is in the specific case the

“connecting” factor or the “inner circle” with the companies around responsible for taking the

action. Empirical examples show that it’s difficult to encourage the development of

integration within a network unless a basic structure is already established (Grotz & Braun,

1997: 555). The third party has during years of work and improvements managed to create the

important know-how, skills and finance as well as a socio-cultural and an institutional

infrastructure and this facilitate the members’ process of networking. According to the author,

the office with General Manager Ms. Gerlagh as the connecting link can be seen as the most

important part of the structure of the third party. All the respondents from the interview also

agree that she has succeeded in managing everything around the business network as well as

the trainees. As table one shows, the third party has also developed a high level of social

capital when consider the Relational and Cognitive dimension. Glover and Hemingway,

(2005: 389) explain that social capital allow group members’ potential access to resources

held by others in the group and this access is actually what the third party has succeed to

create in the examined case.

In the examined case, it is clear that “The network structure” primarily influences the creation

of intellectual capital as it in various ways helps to access the actors for the combination and

exchange. The well-developed network structure in the Swedish Chamber indirect also

facilitates the other dimensions of social capital such as the third parties contribution in the

creation of motivation and anticipation for combination and exchange of intellectual capital.

Nahapiet and Ghoshal, (1998: 243) argue that organizations can develop a high level of social

capital in all dimensions and this is also possible to see in the Swedish Chamber when looking

at table 1.

Finally, the author believes that despite the boundaries such as headlines used in the analysis

that it is important to keep this holistic view in mind when analyzing the contribution of the

third party to the network infrastructure.

7.2 Access to parties for combining and exchanging intellectual capital

One of the first and foremost important assumptions in the social capital theory is that the

network ties provide access to resources (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 252). This is also the

case in the Swedish Chamber but the third party does not work with any direct match making

but is rather with the different ties to many kinds of actors providing the members with the

access to different resources. The literature shows, a key factor for the third party to facilitate

the process of networking is to remain the independent outsider and the importance is based

on the fact that it is the soft issues that most of the time make or break the network (Hanna

and Walsh, 2002: 205). In the specific case, Mr. Lingbeek explained that the third party is

Page 66: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

60

providing the members with the contacts and is than “pulling back” with the meaning that the

actors has than the responsibility to make something out of the contacts. Mrs. Runn also

expresses this by saying that the members of the Swedish Chamber are not used with getting

“spoon-feed” but are rather very pro-active.

A remarkable characteristic in the Swedish Chamber of Commerce is the fact that the network

is a non-profit organization. Mr. Hoefman and Mr. Turabaz think that the fact that the third

party is a non-profit organization influences the network and they agree that this has helped

the Swedish Chamber to be the independent outsider. The main empirical results in Kirkels &

Duysters (2010: 375) study shows that the most influential brokers can be find in non-profit

organizations and had a long experience in their branch. The broker in the more profit

oriented organization was otherwise seen to take too much time and effort in order to make a

higher profit and still the involved parties were dissatisfied. Mrs. Thorfinn states that the

Swedish Chamber should be a non-profit organization as the purpose with the network is to

create contacts and not profit. Consequently, the fact that the examined third party is non-

profit organization has helped to overcome this addressed problem and has helped to develop

a trust from the member companies for the third party. Mr. Dijkman assumes that the risk if it

had been a profit organization could be that it develops a competition between the network

and the companies.

The structure of the network is there to facilitate the interchange between the members and

researchers analyze in their studies the ties between the members of the network. According

to the author’s observations of the business network can “loose ties” be found as the members

are from a wide range of industries and meet each other relatively seldom. Nevertheless, also

the “strong ties” can be found within the Swedish Chamber and mainly between the Patron

companies. Granovetter (1973: 76) states that “loose ties” tend to link people from different

groups together whether stronger ties rather tend to be concentrated within particular groups

and this could then be confirmed in the examined network. This kind of diversity within the

Swedish Chamber is according to the same researcher very important when evidence shows

that significant progress in the creation of intellectual capital often derives from bringing

together knowledge from different sources and disciplines (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998:

254).

As, the secondary data showed, the structure around the specific network also includes other

Swedish organizations and the other Nordic countries Business Clubs and this brings further

diversity of knowledge to the business network. Even though these organizations are located

outside the examined network they to bring connections that extend the Swedish Chamber

with business opportunities. Research notes that collecting information is costly and the

access provided from the third party to other network can reduce the time and investment for

finding the right information. Coleman (1988: 98).

When considering the diversity within the Swedish Chamber both the sizes of the companies

and the geographically spread are important to examine. Firstly, as the secondary data and the

author’s own observations showed there are mostly middle sized and larger companies that

can be found in the Swedish Chamber. Anyhow, the respondents at the interviews agreed that

there are satisfied with the spread between the sizes of the companies in the business network.

Page 67: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

61

Hanna and Walsh, (2002: 205) shows in their study that the size matters and firms with at

least 20 employees and a turnover around 2 million British pound was argues to be the

appropriate resource to network successfully and this would then also be true for the

examined case. Mr. Lingbeek made an interesting statement when discussing this, he thinks

that it is an advantages that there are not too many small companies and ZZPs that are mainly

participating in the network because they are looking for more business. Mr. Hoefman also

made his statement on the same issue and sees the problem in that some of the smaller

companies could be intimidated by the prominent role of the multinational Patron companies.

This might give the smaller companies the feeling that their contribution is less important to

the network. On the other hand, Mr. Rentner explains that the smaller companies are bringing

in other questions to the network and their input is also important. In other words, the mix

between the sizes of the companies is crucial to remain to get a spread of different knowledge

and this can therefore be seen as an important task for the third party. The fact that the group

of Patron companies is increasing also change the structure of the network. According to the

author, if the structure in the beginning was seen as a pyramid with a big base and narrow top

is it now moving the opposite direction that could in the long run also influence the role of the

third party and its contribution to the business network.

Secondly, when consider the geographically spread within the network, the data showed that

most of the companies were located in the Western part of the Netherlands and around the

bigger cities. Nevertheless, member companies could be found all over the country and the

interregional spread between the companies that are attending the events can be seen as rather

good. In fact, the access to interregional contact networks is seen as much more important

than what was previously known (Grotz & Braun, 1997: 545). The reason for this is that the

regional cooperation helps mainly to overcome the size problems that cannot be seen as a

problem for most of the companies in the network. The sharing of innovation and technology-

oriented information tend to be more common in interregional networks. One could argue that

the larger companies would benefit of an increased geographically spread whereas the smaller

companies gain the benefit from economic of scale also from regional cooperation. However,

research shows that jointly would all member companies get advantage from the access to

interregional networks as the companies cannot longer relay on their regional economy (Grotz

& Braun, 1997: 554-555). Thirdly, that the third party has succeeded in the role of getting a

relatively good balance between the sizes and the geographically spread can be seen as a

success factor because as Hanna and Walsh state (2002: 204) “maintaining the balance of

skills within the network is essential to its success”.

No matter the different ties, is it clear through the author’s observations that the members get

access to each other through the events organized by the third party. The respondent are all

very satisfied with the event as Mr. Rentner states the Swedish Chamber sticks to the good

events but is also constantly improving. Mrs. Thoifinn explains that she meets new people at

every event and that this brings new ideas into the network. In the business network it is

interesting to consider the difference between the business-related events and the social events

organized by the third party. All respondents, except of Mr. Turabaz states that the business

events are more important than the social events but the statistics shows something else. The

number of participant on the social events is higher compare to the more business oriented

events. This is something that the third party has to consider and from the author’s

Page 68: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

62

interpretation could the third party benefit from combining the Swedish traditions with

business related issues.

7.3 Motivation to combine and exchange of intellectual capital

Considering the relational dimension of the network, the frame of reference suggests that the

relational dimension influences mainly the combination and exchange within the business

network in three different ways. These are through the Access to parties, Anticipation of value

and Motivation of parties to engage in knowledge creation through exchange and combination

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 254).

Firstly, according to the author’s observations and the interviews answer the trust within the

network can be consider very high and this creates access to other people. This is especially

characterizing the relations between the Patron companies were they share the experience and

for instance, during the financial crises, discussed their common problems. Nevertheless, as

Mr. Hoefman states, it is important to remember that trust is not created just though titles and

the fact that the members are working for a large company but also has to do with personality.

Mrs. Runn stated that this kind of trust is something that has to be built up and she was during

the interview coming back to the importance of fulfilling the promises and to the fact that

networking is all about giving and taking. As Putnam, (1993: 167) explains it is a two-way

interaction between trust and cooperation; trust creates cooperation and cooperation return

trust. This can lead to the development of generalized norms of cooperation and this can

increase the willingness to engage in social exchange (Putnam, 1993: 167). This is closely

linked to fulfilling the obligations that also has to be there and gives access to exchange and

intellectual capital. Nahapiet and Ghoshal (1998: 255) state that in the creation of intellectual

capital the obligations and expectations as well as the motivation are influencing the access to

the other members. The third party has succeeded in creating an open atmosphere within the

network where the members can share experience without the risk for creating any harm to

the companies. Mr. Rentner summarized the success by saying that the third party has created

trust by a long-term perspective, continuity and interesting presentations. Hanna and Walsh,

(2002: 205) point out the importance of trust and states that this is especially important if one

firm is larger than the others and the broker main task is to build this trust and this is also

shown in the examined case.

Secondly, that the third party has managed to create an environment where the members are

very active and the anticipation of value is clear within the business network. Mr. Hoefman

and Mr. Lingbeek both talk about organizing company presentation and sharing their

experiences with other members and the values is also created through this actions. The

members that are investing in the network through their time or other support are also

receiving the most value. In other words, the third party has an important responsibility in

supporting the members to invest in the network as this will provide value later on. Mrs.

Thorfinn thinks that the relations created within the business network are long-term relations

and according to her the Swedish Chamber is more established and shows a more long-term,

perspective than other Swedish organizations in the Netherlands.

Page 69: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

63

Many of the respondents at the interviews came back to the fact that the members should have

nothing to hide in an environment such as the Swedish Chamber and the third party.

Therefore, the third party can gain benefits through keeping today’s transparency within the

business network. Research approves that in relationship that are high in trust, people are

more willing to engage in social exchange in general and most specific in cooperative

interaction (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 254). This trust is also possible to see when looking

at the members’ opinion about the third party. During the interview the member did express

their thankfulness for the third party and Mr. Turabaz discussed it more in detail and said that

the Swedish Chamber always fulfills obligations and this creates deeper relationships.

Thirdly, the motivation to share the knowledge is also very high within the business network

and Mrs. Runn explains that the unique part in the Swedish Chamber is that it’s possible to

meet the other companies and to get a feeling about them without having to share any

company secrets. The members are bringing value to each other and creativity can in the

network be seen as an import-export business with the belief that an idea which is seen as

routine in one company can be valuable somewhere else (Burt, 2004: 388). The openness

within the examined network is also characterizing the norms and attitudes that from the

author’s observations are based on typical Swedish values such as Corporate Social

Responsibility, Sustainability and Environmental thinking and these establish a strong

foundation in the network. These values were also, according the observations, most obvious

between the Patron companies that have a certain relationship to each other. Within the

relational dimension of the network is it also important to create identification where the

individuals can see themselves as one with other persons or a group of people (Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, 1998: 255). The common link to Sweden is something that the third party is working

with actively and this has helped to create the identification to other members in the network.

When discussing the relations during the interviews between the member companies within

the network, respondents jointly assuming that there is no competition seen within the

network and Mr. Hoefman explained that the reason for this is that most of the companies are

based in different industries. On the other hand, as the observations showed and as Mr.

Lingbeek stated, when it’s time to talk about more business related issues these are most of

the time being done outside the organized platform. In other words, the interchange starts

within the platform provided by the Swedish Chamber but the actually value or outcome is

harvested outside the network. The ties, norms and trust that is created of the third party is

also possible to transfer from one setting to another and through this affect the pattern of

social exchange. This can result in that even though the organization is created for one

purpose the network can provide a source of valuable resources for others different purposes

as well (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 253).

7.4 Anticipation of value through combining and exchanging knowledge

Research shows that for an interchange to appear communication between the members is

required and is built upon mainly two keystones: shared language and codes and through

sharing of collective narratives (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 253). Communication has been

one of the main things that the author has looked at when analyzing the cognitive dimension

of the network. The communication in the specific network can be divided into two parts: the

Page 70: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

64

communication between the members and the communication from the third party to the

members.

Firstly, when looking at the communication between the members the culture differences are

something that the author in the beginning planed to pay attention to when observing the

Swedish Chamber. This was during the observation not seen to be that notable. Mr. van

Dijkman explains that the reason for this could be that there are not typical Swedish or Dutch

people involved in the network but the members of the business network meet somewhere in

the middle. The different native language was not either something exceptional as English

most of the time is the used language. When looking deeper into the language can, as the

author’s observations showed, a relatively formal approach is found between the members but

this is gets more informal over time as they get to know each other better.

Secondly, the current approach that the Swedish Chamber uses to reach its members is mass

communication where the third party tries to reach everyone with the same message through

traditional or digital Medias. This is an improvement area, where the third party could get

better by customizing its information and adapt this to the members’ needs. The third party

has an important role in combining their technical network such as the communication on the

website and through social media with their physical network such as the events and activities

organized. Overall, the fact that the network has a jointly language in common is requisite in

order to reach the members and research also shows that a shared language facilitates the

ability to gain access to people and through this also information. On the other hand if the

language and codes had been different could this have kept the people apart and blocked their

access to each other (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 253).

For the interchange of information to work smoothly this also requires a shared context within

the network. In the examined network, it is clear that Sweden is the common link for the

members and as discussed within the relational dimension this brings the members together in

the business network. Mauer and Ebers, (2006: 264) explain that a shared language and

shared meanings, such as what we have seen in the Swedish Chamber, allow actors to gain

access to the information and resources of their social relations, which they could not obtain

without the investment. More specific, to gain access to the new resources also requires an

investment from both the third party and the members of the business network. Mr. Lingbeek

and Mrs. Lindmark both mentioned that the trust is also received because of the high

professional level of the members but also because of their similar attitudes about networking.

There statements show how closely linked the cognitive dimension is to the social dimension

discussed earlier.

The common narrative such as shared myths, stories, metaphors are also created through the

members’ link to Sweden that already has been discussed under the shared codes. As the

observations showed the traditional Lucia celebration is a great example that shows who a

Swedish tradition is creating shared narratives that also are shared during other times of the

year. According to the respondents, the study trips to Sweden can create common stories that

the members can discuss at other settings. Research shows that the shared narratives within

the network are important as it enables the creation and transfer of new interpretation of

events and this also facilitates the combination of different forms of knowledge (Nahapiet and

Ghoshal, 1998: 254). Mrs. Lindmark explains that the distance to Sweden is decreasing

Page 71: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

65

through the Swedish Chamber and this is beneficial for the members that will remain the

contact with Sweden. Mr. Rentner thinks that the link creates also a feeling of security and

this help the people that do not want to cut their bands to Sweden.

7.5 Combination Capability

When analyzing the combination capability of the third party it is important to consider if the

parties within the examined network have overlapping knowledge. Because as research shows

in order to develop the value of the interchange the different parties must have some overlap

in knowledge (Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 254). Eisenhardt and Santos, (2000: 1) are two

researchers that agree on this and if the knowledge is heterogeneous can this give advantages

and superior corporate performance among firms.

This overlapping knowledge can be found in the examined case in the fact that the members

are active in a wide range of industries. This is also provided by the fact that the Swedish

Chamber includes Dutch companies and Swedish subsidiaries. Research states the foreign

subsidiaries are many times more innovative in comparison to domestic firms and this can

give new insights to a business network. According to Kirkels and Duysters (2010: 383) the

reason behind this is the knowledge transfer from associated companies in addition to local

knowledge and this fact can make the foreign subsidiaries into an important partner in

networking. In other words, to provide a network with members with different knowledge is

an important task for the third party. When asking about the added value that the third party

brings to its members are the jointly answer from the interviewed that the network brings

access to good speakers and people that the members without the network would not get the

chance to meet. Mrs. Runn explains that the network gives access to meet prominent key note

speakers such as Mr. Victor Müller and Mr. Michael Treschow but also the opportunity to

meet the Crown Princess of Sweden. On the other hand, some improvement can also be done

when looking at the connection across different people and when examining the combination

capability of the third party.

Firstly, the third party could increase the benefit to the members by serving as an intermediary

between the network and the Dutch government but also between the Swedish organizations

in the Netherlands. Research states that this is highly important and that the people with

connection across, what in the research is called structural holes, have earlier access to

different information and interpretation and this gives them a competitive advantage in seeing

and developing ideas (Burt, 2004: 388). In other words, if the third party could be better in

filling the gap between the network and other interesting actors with other knowledge and

experiences this would give the members of this business network new advantage.

Secondly, when discussing the combination capability, most of the people connected to the

network believe that the third party could add value through getting new and more active

members to the Swedish Chamber. Firstly, to get more active members is not an easy task for

the third party but Mr. Turabaz suggests that one way would be to organize less events and

keep a really high level on the events organized. To create a circulation and the possibility to

meet new people on each event would also get more people to the events as the chance to get

new ideas always will be there. More specific, Mr. Rentner explains that one idea could be to

work with “Success cases” where good examples can get new members interesting of the

Page 72: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

66

business network. Secondly, to gain new members could be accomplished through a closer

co-operation between the Swedish Chamber and the Young professionals (JCC). To always

recruit the Young professionals that have past the age limit for JCC, would create a constant

stream of new members and member companies. The younger members might not necessary

be more active but could provide new insights and ideas to the business organization. The

author also believes that the third party would benefit through combining the technical and

physical platform and could through this ensure that the right target groups are reached with

the accurate message. Van Heck and Vervest, (2007: 32) explain that networking today and in

the new business network approaches business networks should be combined with

telecommunication capabilities. This could more actively be used both in the process of

gaining new members but also in the communication with the already existing members.

Because as Burt, (1992: 12) explains networking is about who you reach and how you reach

them.

Thirdly, the third party could also improve the combination capability through sending out a

member survey in end of each year. This will give the third party a hint of where the

organization has to improve in order to provide a higher value to the members. Furthermore, a

survey could also increase the commitment of the members and give them a possibility to

influence and improve the quality of the Swedish Chamber. Summarizing, all the things

discussed in the last section will also improve the third party capability to quickly connect and

disconnected with the other actors which is in the smart business networks seen as a success

factor (Van Heck & Vervest, 2007: 34).

Page 73: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

67

8. Conclusion

This thesis investigates the contribution of third parties to the members within the network

infrastructure. Since the world surrounding the organization is becoming more complex

organizations have to consider networking to access the required resources (Kirkels &

Duyster, 2010: 375). Third parties, such as networking associations, can have a main part in

the process to find partners and/or resources which most often gives positive benefit to the

members of the network. Previously research show a lack of knowledge about the

combination and exchange of activities that the third party carries out and it’s unclear how

these actions are affecting the people and consequently the companies involved in the network

(Pittway et al, 2004: 160).

With this as a starting point, the purpose of this thesis was to increase the understanding of

networking and especially the third parties role in the networking infrastructure. In addition,

the study soughs to answer the research question: How does the third party provide benefits to

the members within the network infrastructure?

In the case analyzed, evidence is found that the third party has succeeded in its role to provide

a business and social platform that facilitate the process of creating business opportunities for

the members of the business network. Furthermore as table one summarizes the contribution

of the third party is very high and well-balance when consider all the three processes mention

in the combination and exchange of intellectual capital. The contribution of the thesis is that it

recognizes three main factors through how the third party in practice is providing value to its

members:

Firstly, the third party access actors within the network for combining and exchanging

knowledge through a well developed network structure (Grotz & Braun, 1997: 555).

Secondly, the third party is creating anticipation and motivation between the members for the

sharing of knowledge and shows also that investment and action is required to receive value

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal, 1998: 254).

Thirdly, the third party bridges the gap between different actors with various kinds of

knowledge (Burt, 2004: 388).

The thesis also contributes by presenting the factors in which the third party can improve the

work to create and deepen relationship and most of the improvement are interlinked to the

combination capability of the third party.

- The third party would fulfill an important need in the role as an intermediary between

the government and cooperate companies and also between the network and other

Swedish organizations in the Netherlands (Burt, 2004: 388).

- The third party would add value to the network by getting new and more members to

the network (Eisenhardt and Santos, 2000: 1).

Page 74: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

68

- The third party part would give more benefit through a closer co-operation between

the Swedish Chamber and the Young professionals.

- The third party would add value through combining the physical and technical

networks and through this be more customer centric in their communication (Van

Heck and Vervest, 2007: 32).

- The third party would improve their work through sending out a member survey in

end of each year.

The author believes that if the third party takes these factors into consideration, the process of

the combination and exchange can be facilitated and it would be possible to create a higher

value to the business network than the third party already does today.

As the interviews showed, all respondents of the study were also involved in other networks

and this shows the high competition among networks today. This competition can be find

between networks rather than the companies and this gives consequences for the third party.

In other words, the third party also has to compete against other networks and has to give the

members more value than the members can receive from other networks. More concretely,

according to the author the third party has to focus on what makes this network unique and the

respondents at the interview are all mention things as the common link to Sweden that the

network is less strict about business and the opportunity to meet under less competitive

circumstance. These are all unique factors, in which the third party has succeeded.

The author has noticed a shortcoming of the study and this is that the three dimensions of

social capital have been considered separately. In fact this is not true in reality; the considered

dimensions of the social capital are all interconnected and also influence each other over the

boundaries drawn in this thesis. Therefore, to provide a more holistic view of the contribution

of third parties, additional investigation would be beneficial to both consider how each

dimension influence the other dimensions and how they are correlating with each other.

Furthermore, the author of this thesis has focused on how the third party contributes to the

network infrastructure but what the outcome is has not been consider and this would also be

interesting to investigate further. Nevertheless, the shortcomings of this study create also

possibilities for further research that can add additional value to the contribution of third party

in the network infrastructure.

Page 75: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

69

9. Quality of research

9.1 Research quality

The author has in order to provide a certain quality of the thesis considered issues as

generalization, reliability, validity and the credibility that all are critical issues related to the

quality of the research (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 423). As, the study carried out exists of a

qualitative research strategy the author added the qualitative criteria “credibility” in order to

receive a deeper analysis of the quality of the research.

Firstly, what has to be considered is the generalization matters related to a smaller sample

(Bryman & Bell, 2007: 423). The fact that the author has focused on a single network and

carried out seven interviews makes it not possible to draw a conclusion regarding other

network and this can be seen as delimitation of this thesis but has on the other hand made it

possible to examine the chosen case more in depth. Secondly, the problem with generalization

is also closely linked to the reliability of a study that shows if the study would have resulted in

the same conclusion if another researcher would have carried out the same study (Bryman &

Bell (2007: 40-41). The author decided during her work to carry out in-depth interviews but to

also take the opportunity to complement these with observations of the chosen network and

secondary data. It is the author’s view of the collected data that is shown through the analysis

and in the conclusion and the study can therefore be seen as highly subjective and therefore

hard to replicate. Nevertheless, the author has done her best to express how the study is

carried out in detail to give someone else the chance to reproduce the study. How the practical

issues influenced the studies was seen as so important that these even got their own chapters:

the practical method. When discussing reliability, Bryman & Bell (2007: 410) refer to the

external and internal reliability. The external reliability is the problematic to meet the criterion

and the internal reliability explains the degree to which the interviewers have the same

opinion to what is explained. To receive a high level of reliability the author tried to make

sure that she had enough evident for a certain behavior before making any statements to the

data. The author was also asking additional questions to the respondents to make sure that she

had understood the answer correctly. The interviews were after the transcription sent to the

research objectives before the analysis started for confirmation of that their opinions were

mentioned properly. Thirdly, the author has also considered the validity that means that the

author has examined what she said she was going to study (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 410). To

gain the highest possible validity the author was through the thesis making sure that she kept

the research question and purpose in mind and the chooses and assumptions throughout the

thesis are done based on these.

Finally, some researcher believe that to consider reliability and validity are not enough when

carrying out qualitative research and therefore the term credibility is also added which shortly

means that the interview is carried out using “good practice” (Bryman & Bell, 2007: 411).

This kind of “good practice” has the author showed through a well planned research process

where every assumption and decision is well considered and motivated throughout the entire

thesis. A high level of credibility is also received through that the author has been well

prepared for the interview and have had good knowledge about the companies and this has

also improved the quality of the data collection. Saunders et al (2009: 321) agrees that a high

Page 76: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

70

level of knowledge about the research objective and the settings around reduce bias and

increases the reliability of qualitative research. How this good practice is exposed in this

thesis will be discussed further under the next section.

9.2 Ethics

The ethics issues have been consider during the entire research process and this has also been

seen as highly important due to the fact that the study was carried out within a real

organization. The author wanted during the study to make sure that she was not causing any

damage for the research objective. Kvale (1997: 105) also agrees that the ethical issues – such

as consent, confidentially and privacy - should be considered from the planning stage to final

word in the conclusion. From the author’s point of view, these ethical issues are foremost

important to consider making sure that the right picture is captured of the Swedish Chamber

of Commerce.

Firstly, consent is about informing the respondent about the benefit and drawbacks of

participating in the interview. The respondents were informed about the purpose of the study

in an email that was sent to the respondents before the interview. In the email was it clearly

stated what the study was going to be used for and how this would be beneficial. Before the

interview was carried out the author did explain the purpose again in order to make sure that

everything was clear for the respondent. Secondly, regarding the confidentially that deals with

the respondents integrity, the author was considered to make the research objects anonymous

in the thesis by not mention their names (Kvale, 1997: 107-109). This was in the end not

being done as all the respondents agreed to have their own and the company’s name stated in

the thesis. The author herself saw the possibility to state the name in the thesis as a strength

and this would also make it easier if other researcher wish to replicate the study. Thirdly, the

privacy was also kept during the interview and the changes that the respondent wanted to have

made after reading through the interview were being done to remain the respondent’s privacy.

Last but not least, the author has during her entire work made a clear statement that it is her

own words that are used and not someone else. When using other researchers studies or

opinions are sources used and clearly mentioned in the thesis. Before the printing of the

thesis, the interview respondents and the General Manger of the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce have made their approval. The reason for doing this was that the author wanted to

make sure that she had understood the respondents’ opinion when their answer the interview

questions. The risk with taking the respondent opinions in to consideration could have been

that they wanted to change things afterwards that did not sound good enough. Fortunately,

this has not been the case in this thesis and the changes being done after the approval have

mainly been the spelling and the authors chose of words. Finally, in the end the author is fully

responsible for the eventual errors that could be found in the thesis.

Page 77: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

71

10. Further research

In the last chapter of the thesis, the authors will share her suggestions to other scholars and

provide ideas of directions for further research. As research most of the time leaves more

questions than answers the following issues could be valued to examine when bringing new

insights into the studies about the third party in the process of networking.

Firstly, the author has in this thesis been considering the three dimension of social capital

separately and this can be seen as a limitation of this study. Also Naphaiet and Ghosal (1998:

261) agrees that it would it be of interest to examine the interrelationship among the

dimensions. This study gives a hint of the correlation of the Structural, Relational and

Cognitive dimensions of Social capital when examining the role of the third party but it is not

clear in what ways that the three dimensions are supporting or conflicting with each other in

the process of building up the intellectual capital within the network. For instance, it is seen in

the examined case that the network structure probably influences the other dimension but how

and in what extend are not taken into consideration. The dimensions should therefore in

further research jointly be taking into account. Further studies would when examining these

together provide a more holistic view of the third party and this would add value to the

research. In line with the first suggestion, further research should also take more factors from

each dimension into consideration and it would also be interesting to examine the negative

consequences of social capital as some element of social capital might be antagonistic rather

than supportive and dues not beneficial in the process of creating a positive outcome.

Secondly, the authors focus in this study has been on the process behind the creation of

intellectual capital rather than what kind of outcome that is actually created. In other words,

what has actually been provided and the value of this has not been measured. Further research

should therefore examine what kind of knowledge that is actually achieved in the process of

networking when using a third party. In this thesis, a qualitative study has been carried out

and it has not been possible to measure the closed triple relations. As Kirkels and Duysters

(2010: 384) mention, in order to make progress in this area it would be interesting to use

quantitative research and measurement to bring new insights to the research area.

Current researchers, for instance by Professor Eric van der Heck, that the author got the

opportunity to listen to at Rotterdam School of Management, are discussing the main value

provided from networking. van der Heck explains that the value is not created within the

network but rather outside the platform for the interchange and what this value is would be

interesting to consider in further research. Finally, the author of this thesis will leave these

suggestions to other researchers to continue the research about the third party in the network

infrastructure.

Page 78: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

72

References list

Adler P. S. & Kwon S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept, The Academy

of Management Review, 27 (1) 17-40.

Ahuja G. (2000). Collaboration Networks, Structural holes, and Innovation: A longitudinal

study. Administrative Science Quarterly, (45) 425-455.

Agarwal & Alverez S. (2004). Kluwer Academic Publishing, 233-252.

Andrews, R. (2005), The Place of Systematic Review in Education Research. British Journal

of Educational Studies, 53, 399–416

Backman, J (1998). Rapporter och uppsatser. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Backman, J. (2008). Rapporter och uppsatser, Jarl Backman och studentlitteratur.

Barber, A. Waymond, L. (2007) Make your contacts count (2nd

edition) AMACOM Books

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (ed) Handbook of Theory and

research for the sociology of education .241-258. New York: Greenwood

Brown J. S. Duguid, P. (2001) Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practise Perspective

Orgabnizational Science 12 (2) 198-213

Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Burt R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Harvard University

Press Cambridge Massachusetts and London England

Burt, R. (2004). Structural Holes and Good Ideas, The American Journal of Sociology, 110

(2). 349-399.

Centola, D. & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties,

American Journal of Sociology, 113 (3) 702-734.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of

Sociology. 94. 95-120.

Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of Social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of

Harvard University Press

Coles, A., Harris, L. & Dickson, K. (2003). Testing goodwill: conflict and cooperation in new

product development networks. International Journal of Technology Management, 25, 51–64.

Page 79: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

73

Conway, S. (1995). Informal boundary-spanning communication in the innovation process: an

empirical study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 7, 327–342.

Curran, J. & R. A. Blackburn (2001). Researching the Small Enterprise. London: Sage

Publication

De Jong, JPJ. & Marsili, O. (2006). The fruit flies innovations: A taxonomy of innovative

small firms, Research policy, 35(2) 213-229.

Eisenhardt K. M. Santos M. F. (2000) Knowledge-based view: A theory of a strategy?

Handbook of Strategy and Management, Sage Publication

Eisenhardt K. M. & Graebner M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and

challenges, Academy of Management Journal. 50 (1), 25–32.

Evans TS. & Lambiotte R. (2009). Line graphs, link partitions and overlapping communities,

Physical review E, E, 80 (1)

Frost J. (1997). Kvalitativa intervjuer, Jan Frost and Studentlitteratur

Ghoshal, S. & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction

Cost Theory. Academy of Management Review. 21 (1). 13–47.

Glover, T & Hemingsway, J. (2005). Locating leisure in the social capital literature. Journal

of leisure research 37 (4), 387-401.

Graneheim, U. H. Lundman, B. (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research:

concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness , Nurse Education Today 24,

105–112

Granovetter M. S. (1973). The Strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology 78,

1360-1380.

Granovetter M, & Swedberg R, (2001), The Sociology of Economic Life, West view press

Grotz R. & Braun B. (1997). Territorial or Trans-territorial Networking: Spatial Aspects of

Technology-oriented Cooperation within the German Mechanical Engineering Industry,

Regional Studies, 31 (6) 545- 557.

Hanna V. & Walsh K. (2002). Small firm networks: a successful approach to innovation? R &

D Management, 32 (3) 201-207.

Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure

and Access in an Advertising Firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37.

Page 80: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

74

Jack, S. L. (2005). The Role, Use and Activation of Strong and Weak Network Ties: A

Qualitative Analysis, Journal of Management Studies 42 (6) 1233-1259.

Johanisson, B. (1990). Economics of overview - guiding the external growth of small firms.

International Small Business Journal, 9, 32-44.

Johanson J & Vahlne J. E. (2009). The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited:

From liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership, Journal of international Business

studies, 40, 1411-1431.

Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and woman of the corporation, New York: Basic Books

Kossinets, G. & Watts, DJ. (2006). Empirical analysis of an evolving social network, Science,

311 (5757) 88-90.

Kirkels, Y. & Duyster, G. (2010). Brokerage in SME networks, Research Policy 39, 375–385.

Krackhardt D. (1988). Predicting with Networks: A Multiple Regression Approach to

Analyzing Dyadic Data. Social Networks, 10. 359-381.

Kvale, S. (1997). Den kvalitativa Forskningsintervjun. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet.

358 (9280) 483-488

Maurer, I. & Ebers, M. (2006). Dynamics of Social Capital and Their Performance

Implications: Lessons from Biotechnology Start-ups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(2).

262-292.

Miller, NJ. Besser, T. Malshe, A. (2007). Strategic networking among small business in small

US communities, International small business journal, 25 (6) 631-665.

Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in modern societies. Cambridge, England: Polity Press

Nohria, N. & Eccles R. G. (1992). Is a network perspective a useful way of studying

organizations? Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action Boston, MA:

Harvard Business School Press. 1-22.

Pittway, L. Robertson, M. Munir K. Denyer D. and Neely, A. (2004) Pittaway, Networking

and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management

Reviews 5/6 (3-4)137–168.

Pope, C. Ziebland S, Mays, N. (2000) Qualitative research in health care, analyzing

qualitative data. Education and debate, 320 (7227) 114-116.

Putnam, (1993). The prospectus community: Social capital and public life. American

Page 81: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

75

Prospect, 13, 35-42.

Saunders, M. Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. 5th

ed. Harlow: FT/Prentice Hall

Schumpeter, J. (1934). Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University

Press

Scott N, Baggio R, Cooper C. (2008). Network analysis and tourism from theory to practice,

Cromwell Press Ltd.

Smilor, R. & Gill, M., (1986). The NewBusiness Incubator: Linking Talent, Technology, and

Know-How. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

Sorenson, O. & Stuart, T. E. (2004). Social Networks and Entrepreneurship. In Handbook of

Entrepreneurship Research: Disciplinary Perspectives, edited by Olav Sorenson, Rajshree

Spender J-C (1996). Making knowledge the basis of dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic

Management journal, 17 (2): 45-62.

Thorgren, S. Wincent, J. Ortqvist, D. (2009). Designing interorganizational networks for

innovation: An empirical examination of network, configuration, formation and governance,

Journal of engineering and technology management, 26(3) 148-166.

Van Heck E. & Vervest P. (2007). Smart Business Networks: How the smart network wins,

Communication of the ACM, 50 (6) 29-37.

Van der Gaag, M. & Snijders T. A.B (2005). The Resource Generator: social capital

quantification with concrete items, Social Networks 27, 1–29.

Homepages:

NBTC Site, Netherlands Board of Tourism & Conventions NBTC (2010). The Country and

its

people(http://www.holland.com/global/aboutholland/generalinformation/countryandpeople/)

(Reviewed 2011-01-16)

NBTC Site, Netherlands Board of Tourism & Conventions NBTC (2010). Fact and figures.

(http://www.holland.com/global/aboutholland/generalinformation/factsandfigures/)

(Reviewed 2011-01-16)

Swedish Chamber of Commerce(2009). About us.

(http://www.swedishchamber.nl/content/9/10/About_us/Who_we_are). (reviewed 2011-01-

15)

Page 82: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

76

Swedish Trade (2010). Om Nederländerna. (http://www.swedishtrade.se/sv/vara-

kontor/europa/nederlanderna/om-nederlanderna/) (reviewed 2011-01-17).

Swedish Trade (2010). Om exportrådet. (http://www.swedishtrade.se/sv/om-exportradet/)

(reviewed 2011-01-16)

Page 83: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

77

APPENDIX 1

The Social Capital Framework

The Social Capital Framework, Source: Napiet and Ghoshal 1998: 252

Page 84: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

78

APPENDIX 2

Overview of the Qualitative interviews

Date Place Respondent Category Company visit

11 AM May 3 BNConnect Mr. T.H.J

Hoefman

ZZP, Dutch,

Energy

No

10 AM May 4 Inter IKEA Mr. Ehsan

Turabaz

Multinational,

Swedish,

Furniture

Yes

2 AM May 5 Iggesund

Paperboard

Mrs. Ann-

Charlotte Runn

Multinational,

Swedish, Paper

Office visit

2 PM May 6 SCA Packing de

Hoop

Mr. Henk

Lingbeek

Multinational,

Swedish, Paper

Yes, including

paper mill

3 AM May 12 Heussen Mr. Nils Van

Dijkman, Mrs.

Stina Lindmark

Mid-size, Dutch,

Law firm

No

12 PM May 17 MummyMug Mrs. Cecilia

Thorfinn

ZZP, Dutch,

Special kind of

mug

No

5 PM May 19 Swedish Trade

Council

Mr. Andreas

Rentner

Organization,

Swedish,

multinational

Office visit

Page 85: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

79

APPENDIX 3

Interview guide

Introduction:

- Background and purpose of the study

- Request for being anonymous?

Basic information about the company:

I. Legal form of business

II. Number of employees

III. Types of product/service offered

IV. Connection to Sweden

V. Years of being a member in the Swedish Chamber of Commerce

VI. Number of events attended each year

VII. Number of employees active within the network

1. Background (Base of social capital)

What are the main reasons to become a member of the Swedish Chamber of Commerce?

What do you think is the Swedish Chamber of Commerce office most important responsibility within the network?

What kinds of events are most interesting to your organization?

Does your company has a strategically approach to networking? And if so, how does it look like?

2. The structural dimension (Density, connectivity, hierarchy)

What kind of contacts/relations can you gain through the network?

What do you think about the balance within the network regarding the size of the companies?

What are the advantages from a network with smaller/ larger companies?

Are the relations created through the network mainly short or long-term relations? What is the reason for this?

How do you perceive the hierarchy within the network?

How does the fact that the Swedish Chamber of Commerce is a non-profit organization affect the

Page 86: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

80

network?

3. The cognitive dimension (Shared codes, language and narratives)

What kind of common features can be find when looking at the members of the network?

How are the members of the network different native languages affecting the network?

Can you see any shared myths, stories and metaphors within the network? Please give some examples.

4. The Relational dimension (Trust, norms, obligations and identification)

How do you gain access to other people within the network?

How is the motivation of sharing knowledge and experience within the network?

Explain how you perceive the trust within the network.

Do you in your business cooperate with other companies in the Swedish Chamber of Commerce? If yes, was the original contact gained through the Swedish Chamber of Commerce?

5. Created value (New intellectual capital)

What does the Swedish Chamber of Commerce add to you as a member?

Does the network give you financial benefits?

How can the Swedish Chamber of Commerce network improve in order to serve your organization better?

Page 87: The Network Infrastructure

The Network Infrastructure

2011

81

APPENDIX 4

Email sent to the respondents

Dear Mr/Mrs,

My name is Elin Lundström and I am doing an internship at the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce in the Netherlands during the spring of 2011. At the same time, I am also writing

my Master thesis in Business Networking with a focus on the Swedish Chamber of

Commerce.

My study will be used by the Swedish Chamber of Commerce for marketing and

improvement purpose and has the aim to examine the members’ benefits of being a part of

this kind of organization. I am therefore kindly asking you to participate in an interview with

questions about the network. The interview will take approximately 45 minutes and I will

come to your office during the time that suits your agenda the best.

Please let me know if this would be possible and if so, I kindly ask you to give me the soonest

date and time that would work for you. For confidentially reason it is possible to participate

anonymously in the thesis.

Thank you for taking your time to read my email.

I am looking forward to hearing from you,

Kind regards,

Elin Lundström