The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
-
Upload
raja-simman -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
1/51
I M F W O R K I N G P P E R
c
1991 International M one tary Fu nd
T h i s isawo r k in g paper and the au thor wo u ld w e l co me an y
co mmen t s o n
the
present text. C i t a t ions s hou ld refer
to an
unpub l i she d man u s c r i p t men t i o n i n g the au thor and the
dateofi s suanceby theIn ternat ionalMone ta ry F u n d .The
v ie w s
expressedarethoseof the author anddo notneces -
sar i ly
represent those
of
th e
Fu n d .
WP/91/72
INTERNATIONAL
MONETARY FUND
F i s c a l A f f a i r s Department
The GrowthofIndian P u b l i c Debt--
Dimensionsof the ProblemandC orrecti v e Measures
PreparedbyRajaJ.
C h e l l i a h
1/
Authorized f orDistr i b u t ionbyV i t o Tanzi
J u l y
1991
Abstract
This
paper tracesthec ausesof therapid growthofIndia's p u b l i c
debt,with special referencetoi n t e r n a l debt. Itthen demonstrates
thatthe growthofdebt woul dbecomeunsustainabl eby the end of the
1990si fthe
present trend s
c ontinue. It
develops
a
methodology
to
i t e r a t e
thepathofgrowthofdebttod is co verthesustainabl e l e v e lof
the
primary
d e f i c i t . F i n a l l y ,
i t suggests concretemeasures
tobring
down theprimary d e f i c i t .
J EL C l a s s i f i c a t i o nNumber
H63
1/ The main partof t h i s paperwaswritten while Professor RajaJ.
C h e l l i a hof the
National
I n s t i t u t eof
P u b l i c Finance
andP o l i c y
(NIPFPO),NewDelhi, India,was a V i s i t i n g Scholarat the F i s c a l A f f a i r s
Departmentof the
International Monetary Fund.
The
basic data
were
co l le cte d
at the
I n s t i t u t e
at New
Del hi ,
where
revisions
were
a l so
carried
out. Helpingatheringandc o d i f y i n g data fromR.D.Guptaand
computational
assistance
fromK.K. A t r i (bothofNI PF P),andfurther
computational
assistanceinmaking
projections
from J . Brondoloof FAD,
aswe l lasfromK.K. A t r iare
g r a t e f u l l y
acknowledged. Thanks f oruse-
f u l
commentsare due to
V i t o
Tanzi, Jo ce l y n Horne,Anupam Basu, Shankar
Acharya,andSusan Sc hadl er. Theauthoris
responsib le
f oranyerrors
that remain.
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
2/51
- i i -
Contents Page
I .
I n t r o d u c t i o n 1
1 . O b j e c t i v e s 1
2 . D e f i n i t i o n o f p u b l i c
debt
a n d
d e f i c i t
2
3 .
Coverage
a n d
assumptions
3
4. T he p u b l i c
debt
p o s i t i o n i n t h e
base
year (1989/90) 5
5 .
Growth
o f p u b l i c
debt--1990/91 through2000/01:
Assumption I 7
6.
Debtdy namics
a n d r e l a t e d
conceptual
i s s u e s 18
7.
Growth
o f
debt--scenario
under
A ssumption
I I 24
8 . M a i n t a i n i n g a constant p r o p o r t i o n o f primary
d e f i c i t
t o G DP 2 6
9.
Measures
t o reduce t h e
primary d e f i c i t r a t i o
3 0
1 0 . A suggested
accounting
framework f o r a p p r a i s a l
o f
long-term
f i s c a l
stance
3 9
Text
Tables
1 . I n d i a : T he L e v e l o f
Debt
a n d i t s Composition 6
2 . I n d i a : P r o j e c t i o n o f t h e Growth o f
Debt
t o G DP
Under
Assumptions I a nd I I 8
3 . I n d i a : Growth o f I n t e r e s t o n P u b l i c
Debt
UnderAssumptions I a nd I I 9
4. I n d i a : Gross I n t e r e s t
Payments
o n T o t a l
Debt
a s
Percent
o f
Gross
C e n t r a l
Government Revenue
11
5. I n d i a : R a t i o o f Borrowing (Domestic a n d T o t a l )
t o G D P
UnderAssu mptions
I a nd I I 12
6. I n d i a : N et I n t e r e s t
Payments
o n T o t a l
Debt
a s
Percent
o f Ne t C e n t r a l Government Revenue 13
7. I n d i a : Average I n t e r e s t
Rate
o n T o t a l
Debt
14
8. I n d i a : N et Domestic Borrowing a s a
Percent
o f
Gross DomesticSavings 16
9. I n d i a :
Primary D e f i c i t
a s a
Percent
o f G DP 2 5
1 0 . I n d i a :
SimulatedDebt:GDP
R a t i o 28
1 1 . I n d i a :
Simulated
Debt:GDP R a t i o 29
1 2. I n d i a : SimulatedDebt:GDP R a t i o 3 1
1 3. I n d i a : Growth i n Revenue
Expenditure
o f t h e
C e n t r a l
Government
33
1 4. I n d i a : U t i l i z a t i o n o f C a p i t a l Receipts 37
AppendixTabl e
1 5. I n d i a : Decomposition o f
Growth
i n t he
Debt
o f C e n t r a l
Government 4 3
Appendix Decomposition o f Growth i n th e
Debt
o f C e n t r a l
Government 4 2
Chart I . Debt:GDP R a t i o 44
References 4 5
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
3/51
- ii i -
Summary
Th is
paper
examines p u b l i c debt i n
I n d i a
and conclu des that i f present
trends of b orrowing by the
Government
of
I n d i a
c ontinue, the cou ntry
w i l l
plunge i n t o
f i n a n c i a l
c r i s i s by the end of the 1990s. I t analys es the
cau ses of the growth of debt by tra c i ng trends i n the t o t a l
f i s c a l d e f i c i t
and i n the primary
d e f i c i t .
I n the base year 1989/90, the primary d e f i c i t
was nea rl y 4 percent of GDP, whi l e the t o t a l d e f i c i t was take n to be 7.6
perc ent. On the b as i s of anumberof conserv ativ e (fav orab l e) assumptions
and u si ng a simple proje ct ion methodology, th e a n al y s i s demonstrates th at
maintaining
the primary
d e f i c i t
even at a
l e v e l
of 3.5 percent i s u nsu stai n-
a b l e because t h i s would
raise
the debt-to-GDP r a t i o to 77.4 perc ent i n
2000/01from 60.2 p erc ent i n1989/90, and the d efi c i t-to- GDP r a t i o to nearl y
10 percent. Interestpaymentswoul d then ab sorb 6.4 perc ent of GDP, ca st in g
an unbearable burden on thebu dget.
The
paper
showsthat the f i r s t stage of f i s c a l adjustment should
con s ist of
measures
to enable the
Government
to reduce the primary
d e f i c i t
t o 2.5 per c ent of GDP by the y ear 2000/01. I f t h i s i sdone, the
growth
of
p u b l i c debt w i l l slow and the t o t a l d e f i c i t w i l l be c ontai ned around 8 per-
c ent of GDP i n
2000/01.
I n ord er to reduc e the primary d e f i c i t to 2.5 perc ent of GDP, ste ps
mustbe taken to reduc e the d e f i c i t on the
b u dget's
revenue acc ount to
takemuchof the f inan c in g of the p u b l i c
enterprises
out of the b udget,
t o s t a b i l i z e the
rate
of c a p i t a l formati on on government acc ount, to
raise
the return on government len d i ng and inv estment, and to i nc reas e the income
e l a s t i c i t y
of taxes through tax reform. Giv en the waste and s l a c k i n
Government,
and i n vi ew of
c erta i n u n j u s t i f i a b l e
s u b s i d i e s ,
expenditure
red u c tion sho u l d be emphasizedmorethan tax i nc reases . Three steps are
needed: narrowing the
scope
of
gov ernment a c t i v i t i e s ,
freezing
government
employment,and
c u t t i n g s u b s i d i e s .
To reduc e c a p i t a l expenditure, the
Government shou l d p r i v a t i z e pu b l i c enterprises and c l o s edownor s e l l
i n e s s e n t i a l loss-making ventu res, whi l e compensating or r e h a b i l i t a t i n g the
workers who
w i l l
be d i s p l a c e d .
F i n a l l y ,
the P l anning Commission's approach
o f approvi ng the
growth
of expenditure w i t h i n a f i ve - y ear horiz on without
regard to how the hi gher expend itu re w i l l be su stained i n the f ut ure ,must
be
abandoned.
Oncethe f i r s t stage of adjustment i s completed, l oan fi nanc e shou l d be
l a r g e l y
l i m i t e d to c a p i t a l expenditures,whose
benef it s
c ou l d be spread over
anumberof y ears . The
paper
ends by sug gesting an acc ounting framework
thatwoul d help regu l ate and eval u ate the r o l e of debt i ngov ernment
finance.
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
4/51
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
5/51
I .
I n t r o d u c t i o n
1. Q b j e c t i v e s
The
u n i nterr u pte d
and
r a p i d
growth of
p u b l i c
debt i n
I n d i a
d u r i n g
t h e 1980s
i s on l y a
man i festat i on
of the deepening
f i s c a l c r i s i s t h a t
has ov ertake n the c ou ntry .
E a r l i e r
on,
most In d ian
economists had
h e l d
t h a t
the growth of p u b l i c debt i n pl anned magnitud e was normal and
d e s i r a b l e
i n a d e v e l o p i n g c o u n t ry
s i n c e government
b orrowing represented
t h e a bs orpt ion by the
Government
of a
part
of domestic sav i ngs and of
t h e
i n f l o w of c a p i t a l from ab road, to
f i nan c e
and promote c a p i t a l forma-
t i o n i n the p u b l i c
s e c t o r
and p r i o r i t y areas i n the p r i v a t e
s e c t o r .
The
r a t h e r complacent
a t t i t u d e
togov ernment budget d e f i c i t ( i n the broad
sens e) and the r e s u l t a n t growth i n p u b l i c debt was based on the assump-
t i o n s
t h a t
b orrowed fu nds would be used only f o r c a p i t a l purposes and
t h a t the r e s u l t a n t inv estments would yet y i e l d adequate d i r e c t or
i n d i r e c t r e t u r n s . The assu mptions
were o f t e n
not
f u l f i l l e d
i n p r a c t i c e .
The
manner
i n w hi c h
c a p i t a l
fu nds from the dom esti c
p r i v a t e s e c t o r
were
r a i s e d
and i t s impact on the a l l o c a t i o n of reso ur c es a l s o have not been
a d e q u a te l y
s t u d i e d
and tak en note of . The
f i s c a l c r i s i s
and the a t t e n -
dant exponential growth of p u b l i c debt has a r i s e n , not merely because of
revenue ex pend it u res ru nning ahead of
c u rrent
rev enues, but a l s o because
c a p i t a l e x p e n d i t u r e s
f i nan c e d
by b orrowing have no t been p r o d u c t i v e of
adequate
r e t u r n s .
P u b l i c debt has
grown
ver y f a s t d u r i n g the 1980s--both a b s o l u t e l y
and i n r e l a t i o n to GDP. The t o t a l debt of the
C e n t r a l
and s t a t e govern-
ments
1/,
a c c o r d i n g
to b u dgetary f i g u r e s ,
grew
from Rs
215.77 b i l l i o n
at
t h e
end of
1970/71
to Rs 663.51
b i l l i o n
at the end of 1980/8 1. From
t h i s l e v e l ,
i t
grew r a p i d l y
to Rs 2,637.58
b i l l i o n
at the end of
1988/89.
As a
proport i on
of GDP,
t h i s
meant
a
f a l l
from 50 perc entat
t h e
end of Marc h, 1971, to 48.9 per c ent at the end of 198 0/81, and then
a
r i s e
to 67.4 perc ent at the end of
1988/89.
Of the t o t a l p u b l i c debt
( c enter
and
s t a t e s ) , e x t e r n a l
debt acc ounted f or Rs
252.30 b i l l i o n
or
9.57 per c ent of the t o t a l at the end of 1988/89.
The debt of the
Government
of I n d i a (GOI)
grew
from Rs 191.93
b i l -
l i o n
at th e end of
1970/71
to Rs 594.49
b i l l i o n
at the end of 1980/8 1,
and to Rs
2,282.41 b i l l i o n
at the end of
1988/89;
of
t h i s ,
i n t e r n a l debt
ac c o unted
f or Rs 2,027.02
b i l l i o n .
That i s ,
i n t e r n a l
debt at the end of
1988-89 formed 51.8 perc ent of GDP i n t h a t y e a r .
I t
i s
c l e a r
t h a t d u r i n g rec ent y ears the p u b l i c debt in I n d i a has
been
growing at a
r a t h e r
a l a r m i n g
r a t e , with
the bu dget
d e f i c i t s
i n c r e a s i n g
as a
proportion
of revenues as w e l l as of GDP. 2/
A l o n g s i d e ,
t h e proportion
of the
c e n t r a l
government
d e f i c i t f i nan c e d
by net Reserve
1/
E l i m i n a t i n g do u b le c o u nting and i g n o r i n g the
smal l
p o r t i o n of
c e n t r a l
government
s e c u r i t i e s
h e l d
by the s t a t e governments.
2/ The r a t i o
d e f i c i t
to GDP was arou nd 8 per c ent i n1989/90 for th e
GOI.
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
6/51
2
Bankof
I n d i a
(RBI )
c r e d i t
has
i n c r e a s e d
from
l e s s
than16percentin
t h e e a r l y
1970s
ton e a r l y one
t h i r d
d u r i n g the l a t t e r h a l f of the 1980s.
T h i s
b u rgeoning
of
p u b l i c debt
and the
d i s p r o p o r t i o n a t e
and r i s i n g
share
o f RBI c r e d i tin the
t o t a l
f i n a n c i n g of c e n t r a l
government
b udget
d e f i -
c i t has n a t u r a l l y g i v e n
r i s e
to s e r i o u s c oncernamong f i n a n c i a l e x p e r t s
as w e l l
as the
general p u b l i c . Q u e s t i on s
have been
r a i s e d about
the
medium-or l ong-term
l
s u s t a i n a b i l i t y of thedebtandi t s b u r d en ,and
f e a r s
have been
expressed about the
Government
and thec o u n t r y )
f a l l i n g
i n t o debt t r a p s , e x t e r n a l
and
i n t e r n a l .
In c o n s i d e r i n g thegrowthof p u b l i c
debt/GDP
r a t i oandi t scon-
seq uences,not
j u s t i n t e r n a l
d e b t ,butb oth
i n t e r n a l
and
e x t e r n a l
debt
s h o u l d
be
i n c l u d e d .
However,thegrowthof
e x t e r n a l
d e btat a
f a s t
pace
and beyond a
l i m i t
c r e a t e s i t sown s p e c i a l problems, whichare a d d i -
t i o n a l
to theproblems cau sedby ther i s i n g debt/GDP
r a t i o
ass u c h ,and
a
d i s c u s s i o n
of theproblems cau sedby
e x t e r n a l
debt must take noteof
t h e
t o t a l ,
e x t e r n a l
debt
of the
economy
as a
whole
and not j u s t t h a t of
t h e p u b l i c
orgovernment
s e c t o r .
In t h i s paper,
a t t e n t i o n
i sf o c u s e don
t h e i n t e r n a l p u b l i c
debtof the GOI,a l t h o u g hthe
GOI's
e x t e r n a l
d e btis
a l s o taken i n t o a c c o untat thea p p r o p r i a t e stageforp r o j e c t i n g thepath
o f
growthof t o t a l
p u b l i c
debt/GDP
r a t i o
and thegrowthof
i n t e r e s t
b u rden.
Threeof themost r e c e nt
s t u d i e s
of theprobl emof the
r a p i d
growth
o f I n d i a n p u b l i c deb t, namely , Rangarajanet al( 1 9 9 0 ) , B u i t e r and P a t e l
( 1 9 9 0 ) ,andGenberg (1989b ) have
c a r r i e d
outmathematic al
e x e r c i s e s ,
on
t h e b a s i s
of an i m p l i c i t or e x p l i c i t model, to
p r e d i c t
thegrowthand
n o n s u s t a i n a b i l i t y of the I n d i a n p u b l i c d e b t . The purposeof t h i spre-
sent paper is not to
e x p l o r e
thec onsequences of thegrowthof
p u b l i c
debt
on theb a s i s of an
e x p l i c i t
model, which takes
i n t o
a c c o u n t
the
i n t e r a c t i o n s
between
thegrowthof
debt/GDP r a t i o ,
r e a l i n t e r e s t r a t e ,
growthof theeconomy ,and i n f l a t i o n . Thepurposeof
t h i s
paperi s
r a t h e r
todemonstrate to thep o l i c y m a k er s
t h a t
the
r a t e
ofgrowthof net
p u b l i c b orrowing witnessed i nrecent y earsis not s u s t a i n a b l e onreason-
a b l e
ass umptions
r e g a r d i n g i n t e r e s t
andgrowth
r a t e s
even i ftheseand
t h e
i n f l a t i o n
r a t e
are
h e l d i n v a r i a n t
to the
r a t e s
ofgrowthof
d e f i c i t / G D P and
deb t/GDP
r a t i o s . A f t e r s u c h d e mon strat i on , a t t e n t i o nis
c on c entrate donworkingout thedegreeofadj u stment needed to r e s t r i c t
t h e
growthof
i n t e r n a l
debtto a
s u s t a i n a b l e
l e v e l ,and on the
p o l i c y
measures
r e q u i r e d to move toward t h a t o b j e c t i v e . D uringthec o u r s eof
t h e d i s c u s s i o n ,
anattempt is
a l s o
made to c l a r i f y somec o n c e pt u a l
i s s u e s.
2.
D e f i n i t i o n
of
p u b l i c
debtand d e f i c i t
In t h i s paper,by
p u b l i c
debt of
I n d i a ,
we mean the
i n t e r n a l
and
e x t e r n a l debtof the GOI. The
most
comprehensive d e f i n i t i o n of I n d i a n
p u b l i c debt would
i n c l u d e
thei nde b tednessofa l lthet h ree
l e v e l s
of
Government
anda l l
p u b l i c e n t e r p r i s e s ,
to thedomestic
p r i v a t e s e c t o r
and to thee x t e r n a l s e c t o r . S i n c ewe aremainl y concerned w i t h i d e n -
t i t y i n g theb u d getary
p o l i c y
changes to be
e f f e c t e d
by theGOI- -the main
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
7/51
- 3 -
a c t o r i n t h e f i e l d - - w e a r e c o n f i n i n g o u r s e l v e s t o t h e d e b t o f t h e G O I .
I t s o h a p p e n s t h a t , a s o f t o d a y , t h e m a j o r p a r t o f t h e d e b t o f c e n t r a l
p u b l i c e n t e r p r i s e s a n d o f t h e s t a t e g o v e r n m e n t s c o n s i s t s o f t h e i r i n d e b -
t e d n e s s
t o t h e G O I .
H e n c e ,
t h e
d e b t
o f G O I i s a
g o o d
i n d e x
o f t h e
I n d i a n
p u b l i c d e b t .
T h e R B I i s w h o l l y o w n e d b y t h e G O I . W e
t r e a t
R B I a s a p u b l i c
f i n a n c i a l e n t e r p r i s e a n d e x c l u d e i t f r o m t h e d e f i n i t i o n o f t h e G O I .
S i n c e t h e l i a b i l i t i e s o f G O T t o R B I a r e t r e a t e d a s p a r t o f i t s d e b t , w e
a r e a b l e t o c o n s i d e r s e p a r a t e l y R B I c r e d i t t o G o v e r n m e n t , a n d d i s c u s s
i t s c o n s e q u e n c e s .
( H o w e v e r ,
w h i l e d i s c u s s i n g t h e i n t e r e s t b u r d e n o n t h e
c o m m u n i t y a r i s i n g f r o m p u b l i c d e b t , i t m a y b e p r o p e r t o e x c l u d e t h e
i n t e r e s t p a i d t o R B I s i n c e a l m o s t a l l o f i t c a n , i n t h e o r y , b e r e r o u t e d
t o G O I a s d i v i d e n d s . ) B o r r o w i n g f r o m R B I i s e q u i v a l e n t t o p r i n t i n g
b a s e ) m o n e y , w h i c h i s t a k e n a s s e i g n o r a g e . S e i g n o r a g e e n a b l e s t h e
G o v e r n m e n t
t o o b t a i n r e s o u r c e s w i t h o u t
i n c u r r i n g
l i a b i l i t y t o r e p a y o r
p a y
i n t e r e s t .
B o r r o w i n g f r o m
t h e R B I
d o e s
n o t i n
e f f e c t
e n t a i l
a n y
l i a b i l i t y t o r e p a y , b u t i n t e r e s t i s p a i d o n t h e
g o v e r n m e n t
d e b t h e l d b y
t M o s t o f
t h i s
i n t e r e s t i s n o t r e r o u t e d t o G O I b u t i s s p e n t i n
v a r i o u s w a y s b y R B I a s a l l o c a t i o n o f i t s p r o f i t s . W e a r e t h e r e f o r e
r e c k o n i n g t h e l i a b i l i t i e s o f t h e G O I t o R B I a s p a r t o f p u b l i c d e b t , a n d
i n c l u d i n g
t h e i n t e r e s t t h e r e o n i n t h e i n t e r e s t o n p u b l i c d e b t .
T h e b u d g e t d e f i c i t h a s
b e e n
d e f i n e d i n m a n y w a y s . S i n c e w e a r e
d e a l i n g
w i t h p u b l i c d e b t a n d i t s g r o w t h , w e d e f i n e
g o v e r n m e n t d e f i c i t
a s
t h e r e q u i r e d n e t b o r r o w i n g 1 / b y t h e
G o v e r n m e n t
t o c o v e r t h e g a p
b e t w e e n
e x p e n d i t u r e s a n d r e v e n u e s . S i n c e p a r t o f n e t b o r r o w i n g i s u s e d f o r
l e n d i n g ,
e x p e n d i t u r e s a r e t a k e n t o i n c l u d e t h o s e o n ( a ) g o o d s a n d
s e r v i c e s ;
( b ) s u b s i d i e s a n d t r a n s f e r s o t h e r t h a n i n t e r e s t ; ( c ) i n t e r e s t ;
a n d
( d ) n e t
l e n d i n g , i n c l u d i n g i n v e s
t m e n t
i n
e q u i t y . T h i s
g a p i s
g e n e -
r a l l y r e f e r r e d t o a s
f i s c a l
d e f i c i t . F i s c a l
d e f i c i t
m i n u s i n t e r e s t
p a y m e n t
h a s
b e e n
d e f i n e d a s p r i m a r y
d e f i c i t
i n d i c a t i n g t h e g a p i n
r e s o u r c e s o c c a s i o n e d b y t h e c u r r e n t p o l i c i e s o f t h e G o v e r n m e n t .
T h u s ,
p r i m a r y
d e f i c i t
= e x p e n d i t u r e o n g o o d s a n d s e r v i c e s + s u b s i d i e s a n d
t r a n s f e r p a y m e n t s
o t h e r t h a n i n t e r e s t + n e t l e n d i n g - c u r r e n t r e v e n u e s
i n c l u s i v e o f i n t e r e s t a n d d i v i d e n d r e c e i p t s . I f p r i m a r y d e f i c i t i s
z e r o ,
i t w o u l d m e a n t h a t
g o v e r n m e n t
e x p e n d i t u r e o n t h e t h r e e i t e m s
m e n t i o n e d i n t h e
a b o v e
e q u a t i o n i s c o n f i n e d w i t h i n t h e
l i m i t
o f t o t a l
r e v e n u e s r a i s e d . 2 /
3 . C o v e r a g e a n d a s s u m p t i o n s
T h e s t u d y c o v e r s
t h e
i n t e r e s t - b e a r i n g o b l i g a t i o n s
o f G O I
e x c l u d i n g
a )
s e c u r i t i e s
i s s u e d t o t h e i n t e r n a t i o n a l f i n a n c i a l i n s t i t u t i o n s ;
b ) c o m p e n s a t i o n a n d s p e c i a l b e a r e r
b o n d s ;
a n d ( c ) r e s e r v e f u n d s a n d
1 / G r o s s b o r r o w i n g m i n u s r e p a y m e n t ,
i t a n y , o f
p a r t
o f e x i s t i n g
d e b t .
2 / T h e p r i m a r y
d e f i c i t
c a n a l s o b e c a l c u l a t e d a f t e r e x c l u d i n g n e t
e n d i n g f r o m t h e e x p e n d i t u r e s i d e .
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
8/51
d e p o s i t s . The
d e b t
f i g u r e s
u s e d h e r e
t h e r e f o r e d i f f e r
f r o m
t h e
b u d g e t
f i g u r e s . T h e
d e b t
at th e end of
1 9 8 9-9 0
i s
t a k e n
a s t h e
b a s e
f o r
p r o j e c t i o n s
w h i c h
a r e
e x t e n d e d
g e n e r a l l y up to th e
y e a r
2 0 0 0 / 0 1 .
T o
i n d i c a t e t h e n o n s u s t a i n a b i l i t y of th e f i s c a l
p o l i c y
s t a n c e
o f
r e c e n t
y e a r s ,
we f i r s t
p r o j e c t
t h e
g r o w t h
o f i n t e r n a l
d e b t
o n t h e
a s s u m p t i o n t h a t n e t b o r r o w i n g f r o m d o m e s t i c s o u r c e s , e x c e p t R B I , w o u l d
grow a t th e same r a t e a s i n t h e
l a s t f i v e y e a r s ( A s s u m p t i o n
I ) .
B o r r o w i n g f r o m
R BI i s
t a k e n
t o
r e m a i n c o n s t a n t
as p r o p o r t i o n o f GDP.
D u r i n g t h e p r o j e c t i o n
p e r i o d ,
n o m i n a l
G DP i s assumed t o
grow
a t t h e r a t e
o f
12 p e r c e n t pe r annum; c o m p r i s i n g a r e a l g r o w t h
r a t e
o f 5.5 p e r c e n t
( a s a c h i e v e d d u r i n g
t h e
S e v e n t h P l a n p e r i o d
( 1 9 8 5 - 9 0 ) and as s t i p u l a t e d
i n t h e
E i g h t h P l a n
f o r t h e
p e r i o d 1 9 9 0 - 9 5 ) ,
an d a 6.5
p e r c e n t r i s e
i n
t h e p r i c e l e v e l ( c l o s e t o t h e r a t e o f
i n c r e a s e
i n th e GDP
d e f l a t o r
i n
t h e
1 9 8 0 s ) .
I n
o r d e r
t o
keep
c l o s e
t o
b u d g e t a r y
p r a c t i c e
and to
f a c i l i t a t e
t h e
u s e
of
b u d g e t a r y d a t a , b o r r o w i n g f r o m
RBI or
m o n e t a r y
d e f i c i t , h a s been
t a k e n to be
e q u i v a l e n t
t o ( a ) i s s u e o f
91- da y T r e a s u r y b i l l s , p l u s
( b ) r u n n i n g
down of Government's
c a s h b a l a n c e s . S i n c e
( b ) i s u s u a l l y
n e g l i g i b l e ,
we
t a k e
i n
e f f e c t
what
r o u g h l y
amounts t o
s h o r t - t e r m
b o r r o w i n g
f r o m
R B I . 1 / T h e
r e a s o n
f o r
h o l d i n g c o n s t a n t
t h e r a t i o o f
b o r r o w i n g
f r o m
RB I i s to make
r e a l i s t i c
t h e
a s s u m p t i o n
t h a t t h e r a t e o f
i n f l a t i o n w i l l
n o t a c c e l e r a t e and
w o u l d
b e 6.5
p e r c e n t
pe r annum
i . e . ,
o n l y s l i g h t l y
h i g h e r t h a n
i n t h e
p a s t
i n
t e r m s
o f GDP d e f l a t o r ) .
O n c e t h e
r a t e
o f
i n c r e a s e
i n t h e p r i c e l e v e l i s
t a k e n
t o
r e m a i n
t h e
same as i n th e
p a s t ,
t h e
n o m i n a l
r a t e s o f i n t e r e s t on th e
i n s t r u m e n t s
o f
government
b o r r o w i n g
a r e a l s o assumed t o
r e m a i n
th e same as i n1 9 8 9 / 9 0 .
T h i s
w o u l d i m p l y
t h a t
no
i n c r e a s e
i n t h e
r e a l
r a t e s
o f
i n t e r e s t
w o u l d
b e
needed t o
o b t a i n f u n d s
on an i n c r e a s i n g s c a l e - - a t th e same r a p i d
p a c e
a s
i n t h e
p a s t
f i v e
y e a r s . T h i s
i s a n u n r e a l i s t i c
a s s u m p t i o n .
B u t what
c o u l d b e shown i s t h a t e v e n on s u c h an u n r e a l i s t i c a s s u m p t i o n , a p r o g r a m
o f
b o r r o w i n g
b y GOI l e a d i n g t o t h e
p a s t
r a t e o f
g r o w t h
o f i n t e r n a l
p u b l i c
d e b t w o u l d
not be s u s t a i n a b l e .
T h e n o m i n a l
r a t e s
of
i n t e r e s t
on
d i f f e r e n t
i n s t r u m e n t s
were
a s
f o l l o w s i n1 9 8 9 / 9 0 :
1 /
The
m o n e t a r y
d e f i c i t as
d e f i n e d
b y t h e
R e p o r t
o f t h eC omm ittee t o
R e v i e w
t h e
W o r k i n g
o f t h e
M o n e t a r y S y s t e m ( R B I ,
1 9 8 5 ) i s
b r o a d e r
and
more a p p r o p r i a t e , b u t e v e n t h a t does not i n d i c a t e t h e f u l l m o n e t a r y
i m p a c t
of
b u d g e t a r y o p e r a t i o n s
s i n c e , f o r
e x a m p l e ,
i t
e x c l u d e s
f o r e i g n
g r a n t s
s p e n t
d o m e s t i c a l l y and th e r e c e i p t of p r o f i t s
f r o m
R B I . I n
r e c e n t y e a r s , t h e m o n e t i s e d d e f i c i t , as t a k e n h e r e , and as t r a d i t i o n a l l y
measured i n I n d i a , and th e
m o n e t a r y
d e f i c i t as
d e f i n e d
b y t h e
a b o v e -
m e n t i o n e d
C ommi ttee have been f a i r l y
c l o s e
a s
p e r c e n t a g e
of GDP.
4
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
9/51
D e s c r i p t i o n K a t e o f
I n t e r e s t
M a r k e t l o a n s 1 1 . 5
S m a l l s a v i n g s
( a ) P o s t
o f f i c e
s a v i n g s a c c o u n t . 5 . 5
( b ) O t h e r s 1 2 . 0
P r o v i d e n t
f u n d s , e t c . 1 2 . 0
T r e a s u r y b i l l s 4 . 6
T h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t t h e n o m i n a l r a t e s o f
i n t e r e s t o n f u t u r e borrow
i n g
w o u l d r e m a i n t h e
same
a s i n t h e
base
y e a r
does
n o t
mean t h a t t h e
a v e r a g e r a t e o f
i n t e r e s t
o n
i n t e r n a l
d e b t w o u l d n o t i n c r e a s e .
I n f a c t
t h a t
w o u l d i n c r e a s e f o r t w o r e a s o n s : ( a ) t h e
r e l a t i v e s h a r e o f T r e a s u r y
b i l l s
w i t h t h e l o w e s t
r a t e
o f
i n t e r e s t
w o u l d f a l l a s b o r r o w i n g
f rom
o t h e r
s o u r c e s w o u l d b e
r i s i n g f a s t e r
t h a n G DP
whereas
borrowing from R B I
w o u l d b e g r o w i n g o n l y a s
f a s t
a s G D P ; ( b ) t h e
r a t e
o f
i n t e r e s t
o n
market
l o a n s
c o n t r a c t e d
e a r l i e r
a t l o w e r r a t e s o f
i n t e r e s t
a n d
f o r m i n g p a r t
o f
t h e b a s e - y e a r
i n t e r n a l
d e b t , w o u l d g o u p a s t h e y
mat ure
a n d
a r e
c o n -
v e r t e d i n t o
n e w
s e c u r i t i e s .
I n d e e d , a n i m p o r t a n t f e a t u r e o f
t h i s
s t u d y i s t h a t
t h e m a t u r i t y
p a t t e r n a n d t h e
d i f f e r e n t i n t e r e s t
r a t e s o n t h e components o f
t h e
e x i s t i n g i n t e r n a l
d e b t
h a ve
been t a k e n
i n t o
a c c o u n t , a n d
a d d i t i o n a l
i n t e r e s t
l i a b i l i t y
h a s been i n c l u d e d f r o m t h e
r e s p e c t i v e
d a t e s o f c o n -
v e r s i o n .
T h u s ,
w e g e t a
p r o f i l e
o f
i n t e r e s t
b u r d e n i n r e s p e c t o f
t h e
d e b t
e x i s t i n g
i n t h e base y e a r d u r i n g t h e
p r o j e c t i o n
p e r i o d . T o
t h i s
i s
added
t h e
i n t e r e s t
o n
a d d i t i o n a l
d e b t
a r i s i n g
f r o m
f u t u r e b u d g e t d e f i -
c i t s
.
T h i s p r o c e d u r e e n a b l e s u s t o g e t a
more
r e a l i s t i c
p i c t u r e o f
t h e
f u t u r e i n t e r e s t
b u r d e n t h a n i f w e h a d
assumed
t h e
same a v e r a g e r a t e
o f
i n t e r e s t
a s i n t h e
base
y e a r , o r h a d
a p p l i e d
t h e m a r g i n a l
r a t e s t o
t h e
d i f f e r e n t
components o f
t o t a l
d e b t .
H a v i n g t r a c e d t h e major
i m p l i c a t i o n s
o f t h e g r o w t h o f n e t domes-
t i c
b o r r o w i n g a t a
pace r e g i s t e r e d
d u r i n g t h e p a s t
f i v e y e a r s
( A s s u m p t i o n I ) , w e t h e n
p r o j e c t
t h e g r o w t h o f
i n t e r n a l
d e b t o n t h e
a s s u m p t i o n t h a t t h e
r a t i o
o f n e t d o m e s t i c b o r r o w i n g t o G D P r e m a i n s
c o n s t a n t
a t t h e
l e v e l
r e a c h e d i n
1 9 8 9 / 9 0
( A s s u m p t i o n I I ) .
I n both
c a s e s ,
i n o r d e r t o g i v e a n i d e a o f t h e
t o t a l
d e b t b u r d e n , w e a d d o n t h e
g r o w t h o f e x t e r n a l d e b t o f G O I o n t h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t e x t e r n a l b o r r o w i n g
w o u l d f o r m t h e
same
p r o p o r t i o n o f G D P a s i n t h e
base
y e a r .
4 . T h e
p u b l i c
d e b t
p o s i t i o n
i n t h e
base
y e a r
( 1 9 8 9 / 9 0 )
A t t h e e n d o f 1 9 8 9 / 9 0 ,
t o t a l i n t e r n a l
d e b t amounted t o R s
2,098.7
b i l l i o n ,
w h i c h
c o n s t i t u t e d
4 7 . 9 p e r c e n t o f G D P . T h e major components o f
t h e
i n t e r n a l
d e b t a n d
t h e i r r e l a t i v e
i m p o r t a n c e a r e
shown
i n T a b l e 1 .
T r e a s u r y
b i l l s
r e p r e s e n t i n g b o r r o w i n g f r o m R B I a n d
market
l o a n s
were
o f
e q u a l i m p o r t a n c e , e a c h c a t e g o r y a c c o u n t i n g t o r a b o u t 3 0 p e r c e n t o f t h e
t o t a l .
W h i l e t h e T r e a s u r y
b i l l s
m e n t i o n e d h e r e a r e h e l d b y R B I
, m u c h
o f
5
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
10/51
-
6 -
t h e g r e a t e r p a r t o f m a r k e t l o a n s a r e h e l d
by
t h e
b a n k s
a n d o t h e r f i n a n -
c i a l
i n s t i t u t i o n s .
On
t h e o t h e r h a n d , p r o v i d e n t f u n d s a n d s m a l l s a v i n g s
r e p r e s e n t d i r e c t
l i a b i l i t i e s
t o h o u s e h o l d s , a n d t h e s e t o g e t h e r a c c o u n t e d
f o r
a b o u t
40
p e r c e n t o f
GOI's
i n t e r n a l d e b t .
T a b l e 1 . I n d i a : T h e L e v e l o f D e b t a nd i t s C o m p o s i t i o n
I n
B i l l i o n s
o f
R u p e e s
P e r c e n t
o f T o t a l
M a r k e t l o a n s
S m a l l s a v i n g s
P r o v i d e n t f u n d s , e t c .
T r e a s u r y b i l l s
T o t a l d o m e s t i c d e b t
E x t e r n a l d e b t
6 2 4 . 4 2
4 0 9 . 8 3
4 3 6 . 4 3
6 3 2 . 0 2
2 , 0 9 8 . 7 0
2 8 5 . 1 7
2 9 8
1 9 3
2 0 8
3 0 1
1 0 0 0
Total domestic
de t
/ G D P
External debt GDP
Total debt GDP
4 7 . 9 0
0 . 6 5
4 8 . 5 5
E x t e r n a l
d e b t a t t h e e n d o f
1 9 8 9 / 9 0
a m o u n t e d t o R s
2 8 5 . 2 b i l l i o n ,
w h i c h w a s o n l y 1 2 . 3 p e r c e n t o f G D P . T h u s , t h e t o t a l p u b l i c d e b t f o r m e d
6 0 . 2 p e r c e n t o f G D P .
1
I n t h e
s a m e
y e a r , o f t h e t o t a l d o m e s t i c b o r r o w i n g , T r e a s u r y b i l l s
c o n s t i t u t e d 3 3 p e r c e n t , p r o v i d e n t f u n d s 2 5 . 9 p e r c e n t , a n d s m a l l s a v i n g s
1 9 . 6 p e r c e n t
We
n o t e
t h a t
t h e m a r g i n a l s h a r e o f T r e a s u r y b i l l s i s
h i g h e r t h a n t h e i r a v e r a g e s h a r e , w h i l e i t i s l o w e r t h a n t h e a v e r a g e
s h a r e
i n r e s p e c t o f m a r k e t l o a n s . T h e c o m b i n e d m a r g i n a l s h a r e o f p r o v i -
d e n t f u n d s a n d s m a l l s a v i n g s w a s h i g h e r t h a n t h e a v e r a g e . T h u s , w h i l e
t h e G o v e r n m e n t w a s a b l e t o b o r r o w
r e l a t i v e l y m o r e
d i r e c t l y f r o m t h e
h o u s e h o l d s l a r g e l y t h r o u g h h i g h e r p r o v i d e n t f u n d p a y m e n t s , i t w a s f o r c e d
t o d e p e n d m u c h
m o r e
o n R B I
c r e d i t
t h a n i n t h e p a s t .
1 / T h i s
f i g u r e
d i f f e r s f r o m i h e d e b t G D P r a t i o d e r i v e d f r o m
u n a d j u s t e d
b u d g e t a r y d a t a , w h i c h w a s g i v e n
e a r l i e r
w h i l e d i s c u s s i n g t h e
p a s t
g r o w t h o f d e b t . S e e A p p e n d i x 1t o r a n a l y s i s o f g r o w t h i n p u b l i c
d e b t b e t w e e n 1 9 8 4 / 8 5 a n d 1 9 8 9 / 9 0 .
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
11/51
7
I n
t h e b u d get
proposa l s
f o r 1989/90,
i t
ha d been
d e c i d e d
t o l i m i t
borrowing from
RBI
through Treas u ry
b i l l s t o
around
Rs 72.0
b i l l i o n ,
which would
have
formed
1.64
percent
of GDP f o r
that y ear.
The
r e v i s e d
e s t i m a t e s ,
however,
showed th at b orrowi ng from
RB I
woul d reach
Rs
113.76
b i l l i o n . R e a l i z i n g th at b orrowi ng from
R BI i n
s u c h r e l a t i v e magnitu de
was h i g h l y i n f l a t i o n a r y ,
th e
Finance M i n i s t e r
has
proposed tha t
i n
1990/91,
Treas u r y
b i l l s
i s s u e would
be l i m i t e d to Rs 74.07
b i l l i o n .
Given
t h e
past performanc e
and the
trends
i n
e xpen d i t u re, i t appears
t h a t
t h i s l i m i t might
be
exceeded. However, s i n c e
we
w i s h
t o
preserve
the assu mption tha t
th e
i n f l a t i o n
r a t e
would
not a c c e l e r a t e , we
wou l d
l i k e
t o
proceed
on the
b a s i s that
th e
Government would
b e
ab l e from
now
on
t o
h o l d
RBI c r e d i t t o
i t s e l f
a t 1.7
percent
o f GDP. We a r e
t h e r e f o r e
assuming that
net RBI
c r e d i t
t o
Government
was
o n l y
Rs
74.07 b i l l i o n
i n
1989/90, a n dhave
d e r i v e d
on
that b as i s
th e f i g u r e s f o r t h e
s u c c e ed i n g
years. C orrespon d i ng l y ,
th e
t o t a l
net
b orrowi ng d u r i ng
1989/90,
wh i c h
forms
t h e
b a s i s
o f
p r o j e c t i o n s ,
i s
taken
t o be Rs
304.98
b i l l i o n ,
i n s t e a d of the r e v i s e d b u d get
est i mate
of Rs
344.67 b i l l i o n .
As taken here, th e
t o t a l
b u d get
d e f i c i t
i n
1989/90
c o n s t i t u t e d 7.65
percent
o f GDP
( i n t e r n a l borrowing
7.0
per c ent,
and
e x t e r n a l borrowing
0.65 perc ent ). Primary d e f i c i t formed
3.7
percent
of GDP, and
gross
i n t e r e s t payments 3.9
per c ent.
5.
Growth of p u b l i c d e bt--1 9 9 0 / 9 1
through
2000/01:
Assumption
I
Ta b l e
2
shows
th e
e v o l u t i o n
of the i n t e r n a l
debt/GDP r a t i o
on th e
ass u mpti on that a l l
major components of
domestic b orrowing oth er than
RBI c r e d i t i . e . , market l oans , post o f f i c e sa v i ng s , other sma l l
s a v i n g s , and
provi dent funds ) wou l d grow
at t he same
r e s p e c t i v e r a t e s
as
d u r i n g th e l a s t f i v e
y ears. T h i s
i s
taken
t o
represent
t h e
c o n t i n u a t i o n
o f
th e
present stance
o f f i s c a l
p o l i c y .
On th ea bo ve
assumption,
t h e
i n t e r n a l
debt/GDP
r a t i o grows at an i n c r e a s i n g
r a t e , from
47.9
percent
a t the end of
1989/90
t o 102
percent
by t he end of 2000/01. The
i n t e r e s t on i n t e r n a l
d e b t c orrespon d i ng l y r i s e s from
3.6
percent
o f GDP
i n 1989/90
t o 8.7
percent
i n
2000/01 ( T a b l e
3 ) .
To
th e above
must
be
added
th e
burden
of e x t e r n a l
d e b t.
We make
the si mpl e assu mption that
e x t e r n a l net
b orrowing
b y t h e Government
would remain c onstant
as
p r o p o r t i o n
of GDP at th e
l e v e l
i n 1989/90, and
t h a t
th e
average
i n t e r e s t r a t e on Gov ernment's e x t e r n a l
debt
w i l l not
change.
In
p r a c t i c e ,
t h i s
assu mption might
not
h o l d
good; most
l i k e l y ,
the
l i a b i l i t i e s and the
bu rden
of i n t e r e s t i n
terms
o f
rupees woul d
be
h i g h e r .
1/
Thi s wou l d onl y
mean
that i f an y th i ng,
we a re
u n d e r e s t i -
mating
th e e x t e r n a l
part
o f
t o t a l l i a b i l i t i e s .
When e x t e r n a l l i a b i l i -
t i e s a r e
added,
th e
t o t a l debt/GDP
r a t i o i s
seen
t o r i s e
from
60.2
percent
of GDP at th e end of
1989/90
to 109.9
percent
i n
2000/01
( T a b l e
2 ) .
The
t o t a l
i n t e r e s t payments r i s e
from
3.9
percent
of GDP i n
1/
The
rupee might d epr ec i ate
f a s t e r
than
th e r a t e of
domestic
i n f l a -
t i o n ,
th e
i n t e r e s t
i n d o l l a r
terms might harden,
and the
r a t i o
o f
f o r e i g n
borrowing
t o GDP
might r i s e .
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
12/51
T
a
b
l
e
2
I
n
d
i
a
:
P
r
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
o
w
t
h
o
f
e
b
t
t
o
U
n
d
e
r
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
I
I
Y
e
a
r
1
9
8
9
/
9
0
1
1 1 1
1
1
1
1
9
9
7
/
9
8
1 1
9
9
9
/
0
0
2
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
4
7
.
9
5
0
.
2
5
2
.
7
5
5
.
6
5
8
.
9
6
2
.
7
6
7
.
0
7
2
.
1
7
8
.
1
8
4
.
7
9
2
.
7
1
0
2
.
1
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
D
e
b
t
1
1
1
1
1
9
.
6
9
.
2
8
.
9
8
.
6
8
.
3
8
.
1
7
.
9
T
o
t
a
l
D
e
b
t
6
0
.
2
6
1
.
8
6
3
.
8
6
6
.
1
6
8
.
9
7
2
.
3
7
8
1
.
0
8
9
3
.
1
1
1
0
9
.
9
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
D
4
7
.
9
4
9
.
7
5
1
.
4
5
2
.
8
5
4
.
1
5
5
.
3
5
6
.
3
5
7
.
2
5
8
.
2
5
8
.
8
5
9
.
5
6
0
.
1
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
I
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
D
1 1
1
1
1
9
.
6
9
.
2
8
.
9
8
.
6
8
.
3
8
.
1
7
.
9
T
o
t
a
l
D
6
0
.
2
6
1
.
4
6
2
.
4
6
3
.
3
6
4
.
1
6
4
.
9
6
5
.
5
6
6
.
1
6
6
.
8
6
7
.
1
6
7
.
5
6
7
.
9
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
13/51
1
9
3
9
/
9
0
1
9
9
0
/
9
1
1
9
9
1
/
9
2
1
9
9
2
/
9
3
1
9
9
3
/
9
4
1
9
9
4
/
9
5
1
9
9
5
/
9
6
1
9
9
6
/
9
7
1
9
9
7
/
9
8
1
9
9
8
/
9
9
1
9
9
9
/
0
0
2
0
0
0
/
0
1
T
a
b
l
e
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
D
t
o
G
3
.
5
8
3
.
8
4
4
.
0
9
4
.
3
9
4
.
7
1
5
.
0
8
5
.
5
0
5
.
9
7
6
.
5
1
7
.
1
4
7
.
8
7
8
.
7
3
I
n
d
i
a
:
G
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
D
t
o
G
0
.
3
3
9
0
.
3
4
8
0
.
3
2
9
0
.
3
1
2
0
.
2
9
7
0
.
2
8
4
0
.
2
7
2
0
.
2
6
1
0
.
2
5
1
0
.
2
4
3
0
.
2
3
5
0
.
2
2
8
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
T
o
t
a
l
D
t
o
G
3
.
9
2
4
.
1
9
4
.
4
2
4
.
7
0
5
.
0
1
5
.
3
7
5
.
7
7
6
.
2
3
6
.
7
6
7
.
3
8
8
.
1
1
8
P
u
b
l
i
c
D
U
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
D
t
o
G
3
.
5
8
3
.
8
8
4
.
0
9
4
.
2
8
4
.
4
5
4
.
6
0
4
.
7
3
4
.
8
4
4
.
9
5
5
.
0
4
5
.
1
2
5
.
2
0
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
E
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
D
t
o
G
0
.
3
3
9
0
.
3
4
8
0
.
3
2
9
0
.
3
1
2
0
.
2
9
7
0
.
2
8
4
0
.
2
7
2
0
.
2
6
1
0
.
2
5
1
0
.
2
4
3
0
.
2
3
5
0
.
2
2
8
a
n
d
I
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
T
o
t
a
l
D
t
o
G
3
.
9
2
4
.
2
3
4
.
4
2
4
.
5
9
4
.
7
5
4
.
8
8
5
.
0
0
5
.
1
0
5
.
2
0
5
.
2
8
5
.
3
6
5
.
4
3
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
14/51
- 10 -
1 9 8 9 / 9 0
t o 9.1
p e r c e n t
i n2 0 0 0 / 0 1
( T a b l e
3 ) . Even i f one a s s ume s
t h a t
t h e b u o y a n c y o f r e v e n u e s o f GOI w o u l d be 1 . 2 - - h i g h e r t h a n i n the p a s t - -
g r o s s
i n t e r e s t
payments w o u l d a b s o r b
as much as 60.6
p e r c e n t
o f
r e v e n u e s
i n
2 0 0 0 / 0 1
.
A nd i f
r e v e n u e s i n c r e a s e d o n l y
as
f a s t
as GDP,
i n t e r e s t
payments w o u l d a b s o r b 76.5 p e r c e n t o f r e v e n u e s i n t h a t y e a r ( T a b l e 4 ) .
B y t h a t y e a r
t h e t o t a l
f i s c a l d e f i c i t w o u l d have r e a c h e d
2 0 . 0
p e r c e n t
of
GDP and
d o m e s t i c b o r r o w i n g w o u l d
be 19.3
p e r c e n t
o f GDP,
w i t h
t h e
p r i m a r y d e l i c i t r e a c h i n g n e a r l y 11 p e r c e n t o f GDP ( T a b l e s 5
a n d
9 ) .
We
have
s o f a r
c o n s i d e r e d
t o t a l
b o r r o w i n g
and
g r o s s
i n t e r e s t p ay -
ments
o u t o f t h e b u d g e t . P a r t of th eGovernment's b o r r o w i n g h a s b e e n ,
a n d i n t h e f u t u r e w o u l d b e , u s e d f o r n et f i n a n c i a l i n v e s t m e n t s . H e n c e ,
t h e
n e t i n t e r e s t
b u r d e n
on th e b u d g e t
w o u l d depend
on th e
r e t u r n
on
s u c h
i n v e s t m e n t s . To th e e x t e n t t h a t t h e r e t u r n s on f i n a n c i a l i n v e s t m e n t s
c o v e r t h e
i n t e r e s t
on th e p a r t of b o r r o w i n g u s e d f o r s u c h i n v e s t m e n t s ,
t h e
n e t
b u r d e n
on th e
b u d g e t
w o u l d
b e
r e d u c e d
( o r
w o u l d
n o t
i n c r e a s e ) .
O v e r t h e y e a r s , t h e r a t i o of r e t u r n on i n v e s t m e n t s i n t h e f o r m o f
r e c e i p t s
o f i n t e r e s t and
d i v i d e n d
t o i n t e r e s t pa yments, h as
beenf a l -
l i n g .
S u c h r e c e i p t s
f o r m e d
83
p e r c e n t
o f
g r o s s
i n t e r e s t paymentsi n
1 9 8 2 / 8 3 ; b y 1 9 8 9 / 9 0 , t h e y had come down to 4 8. 4 p e r c e n t . C o r r e s p o n d -
i n g l y ,
net i n t e r e s t
payments
b y t h e Government
ha ve
r i s e n
f r o m
1 7 p e r -
c e n t
o f
g r o s s
payments i n1 9 8 2 / 8 3 to 51.6
p e r c e n t
i n1 9 8 9 / 9 0 . T h e r e
seem t o be t h r e e main r e a s o n s f o r t h e f a l l i n t h e r a t i o o f r e t u r n s t o
payments
o f i n t e r e s t on
d e b t . F i r s t ,
an i n c r e a s i n g
p a r t
o f n e t
b o r r o w -
i n g b y t h e Gov ernment h as been
a b s o r b e d
b y
e x p e n d i t u r e s o t h e r t h a n
n e t
l e n d i n g . S e c o n d , t h e r a t e s of i n t e r e s t c h a r g e d , an d r e c o v e r i e s o f
i n t e r e s t d u e ,
have been l a g g i n g b e h i n d
i n t e r e s t pa yments.
T h i r d ,
th e
a v e r a g e r a t e
o f
d i v i d e n d
on
e q u i t y
i n
p u b l i c
e n t e r p r i s e s
has
been
q u i t e
l o w . I t i s n o t p o s s i b l et o p r e d i c t t h e
movements
i n t h e a b o v e t h r e e
r e l a t i o n s i n t h e
f u t u r e .
We,
t h e r e f o r e , c o n s i d e r
two a l t e r n a t i v e
p o s s i -
b i l i t i e s . We work o u t net i n t e r e s t payments on two a l t e r n a t i v e
ass ump-
t i o n s ,
n a me l y ,
t h a t t h e y w o u l d r e m a i n 50 p e r c e n t o f g r o s s , and t h a t t h e y
w o u l d f a l l
a s
p e r c e n t a g e
of
g r o s s g r a d u a l l y
t o 25
p e r c e n t
b y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 1/
t h e l a t t e r
w o u l d
mean a r a d i c a l r e v e r s a l of
p a s t t r e n d s ) .
T a b l e 6 shows what t h e p r o p o r t i o n s of net
i n t e r e s t
payments to net
r e v e n u e s
ot th eGovernment
w o u l d
b e u n d e r d i f f e r e n t
s e t s
o f
a s s u m p t i o n s
c o n c e r n i n g t h e r a t e of g r o w t h o f r e v e n u e s an d th e p r o p o r t i o n s of net t o
g r o s s payments of i n t e r e s t . I t n e t
i n t e r e s t
payments a r e 5 0 p e r c e n t of
g r o s s
payments u n d e r t h e
a s s u m p t i o n
o f
Government's r e v e n u e s g r o w i n g
a s
f a s t
as GDP, net
i n t e r e s t
payment
as
p e r c e n t
of net
r e v e n u e s w o u l d
r i s e
f r o m 2 0 . 7 p e r c e n t i n1 9 8 9 / 9 0 to 61.9 p e r c e n t i n
2 0 0 0 / 0 1 ; e v e n
w i t h a
b u o y a n c y of 1.2, net i n t e r e s t payments
w o u l d h a ve
r i s e n t o 43. 4
p e r c e n t
o f n e t r e v e n u e s b y
2 0 0 0 / 0 1 .
If onea s s ume s t h a t n e t i n t e r e s t w o u l d t a l l
t o 25 p e r c e n t of g r o s s i n t e r e s t , and government r e v e n u e s
w i l l
h a ve a
b u o y a n c y of 1.2
p e r c e n t - - b o t h f a v o r a b l e a s s u m p t i o n s - - n e t
i n t e r e s t
payments w o u l d
r i s e
to 29.4 p e r c e n t of net r e v e n u e s b y
2 0 0 0 / 0 1 .
But
1 / T h i r t y - n i n e p e r c e n t
b y 2 0 0 0 / 0 1 .
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
15/51
- 11 -
Table
4. I n d i a : Gross I n t e r e s t Payments on T o t a l Debt
as
P ercent
of Gross C e n t r a l Government Revenue
Year
1989/90
1990/91
1991/92
1992/93
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
E l a s t i c i t y
=1.0
3 3 . 6
3 5 . 7
3 7 . 9
4 0 . 2
4 2 . 8
4 5 . 8
4 9 . 2
5 3 . 2
5 7 . 7
6 3 . 0
6 9 . 2
7 6 . 5
Assumption
I
E l a s t i c i t y
=1.1
3 3 . 6
3 5 . 4
3 7 . 1
3 8 . 9
4 1 . 0
4 3 . 4
4 6 . 2
4 9 . 3
5 3 . 0
5 7 . 3
6 2 . 2
68.0
E l a s t i c i t y
=1.2
3 3 . 6
3 5 . 0
3 6 . 3
3 7 . 7
3 9 . 3
4 1 . 2
4 3 . 4
4 5 . 8
4 8 . 7
5 2 . 1
5 6 . 0
6 0 . 6
Y e a r
1989/90
1990/91
1991/92
1992/93
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
E l a s t i c i t y
=1.0
3 3 . 6
3 6 . 0
3 7 . 7
3 9 . 2
4 0 . 5
4 1 . 6
4 2 . 7
4 3 . 6
4 4 . 4
4 5 . 1
4 5 . 7
46.3
Assumption
I I
E l a s t i c i t y
=1.1
3 3 . 6
3 5 . 7
3 6 . 9
3 8 . 0
3 8 . 8
3 9 . 5
4 0 . 0
4 0 . 4
4 0 . 7
4 1 . 0
4 1 . 1
4 1 . 2
Elasticity
=
1.2
3 3 . 6
3 5 . 3
3 6 . 2
3 6 . 8
3 7 . 2
3 7 . 4
3 7 . 6
3 7 . 6
3 7 . 4
3 7 . 3
3 7 . 0
3 6 . 7
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
16/51
Y
e
a
r
1
9
8
9
/
9
0
1
1
1
9
9
2
/
9
3
1 1
9
9
4
/
9
5
1
1
1
1
9
9
8
/
9
9
1
2
0
0
0
/
0
1
T
a
b
l
e
5
I
n
d
i
a
:
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
B
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
7
.
0
7
.
4
7
.
9
8
.
5
9
.
3
1
1
1
2
.
2
1
1
5
.
2
1
1
R
a
t
i
o
o
f
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
U
n
d
e
r
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
T
o
t
a
l
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
7
8
.
1
8
9
9
1
1 1 1 1
1
2
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
a
T
o
t
a
l
)
I
a
I
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
I
7 7
7
.
0
7 7
7
7
7
7 7 7
7
t
o
G
T
o
t
a
l
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
I
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
7 7 7
7
7
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
17/51
- 13 -
T a b l e
6.
I n d i a :
Net
I n t e r e s t
Payments on
T o t a l
Debt
a s P e r c e n t
of Net
C e n t r a l
Government Revenue
P a r a m e t e r s
T a b l e
Growth In GDP
Growth in r e v e n u e s of
C e n t r a l Government
f o r e l a s t i c i t y = 1. 0
1.2
0 . 1 2 0
0 . 1 2 0
0 . 1 4 4
1989/90
1990/91
1991/92
1992/93
1993/94
1994/95
1995/96
1996/97
1997/98
1998/99
1999/00
2000/01
2001/02
2002/03
2003/04
2004/05
2005/06
2006/07
2007/08
2008/09
2009/10
2010/11
N e t
Revenues of C e n t r a l Govt.
A s s u m p t i o n I
5 0 % wt
20.7
2 1 . 8
2 3 . 3
2 5 . 1
2 7 . 2
2 9 . 7
3 2 . 7
3 6 . 2
4 0 . 6
4 6 . 0
5 2 . 9
6 1 . 9
7 3 . 9
9 0 . 5
1 1 4 . 5
1 5 2 . 0
2 1 7 . 4
3 5 7 . 8
8 5 9 . 7
- 3 , 3 4 0 . 4
- 6 2 4 . 1
- 3 6 3 . 0
5 0 - 2 5 % wt
2 0 . 7
2 1 . 8
2 2 . 6
2 3 . 6
2 4 . 7
2 6 . 0
2 7 . 5
2 9 . 2
3 1 . 3
3 3 . 7
3 6 . 7
4 0 . 2
4 4 . 5
4 9 . 8
5 6 . 3
6 4 . 5
7 4 . 9
8 8 . 3
1 0 6 . 2
1 3 0 . 9
1 6 6 . 8
2 2 2 . 7
e = 1.0)
A s s u m p t i o n
I I
5 0 %
wt
2 0 . 7
2 2 . 0
2 3 . 2
2 4 . 4
2 5 . 4
2 6 . 3
2 7 . 1
2 7 . 9
2 8 . 5
2 9 . 1
2 9 . 6
3 0 . 1
3 0 . 5
3 0 . 9
3 1 . 3
3 1 . 6
3 1 . 9
3 2 . 1
3 2 . 3
3 2 . 5
3 2 . 7
3 2 . 9
5 0 - 2 5 % wt
2 0 . 7
2 2 . 0
2 2 . 5
2 2 . 9
2 3 . 0
2 3 . 1
2 3 . 0
2 2 . 7
2 2 . 4
2 2 . 0
2 1 . 5
2 1 . 0
2 0 . 4
1 9 . 8
1 9 . 2
1 8 . 5
1 7 . 8
1 7 . 1
1 6 . 3
1 5 . 6
1 4 . 9
14.1
N e t
R e v e n u e s
of
A s s u m p t i o n
I
5 0 %
wt
2 0 . 7
2 1 . 2
2 2 . 2
2 3 . 2
2 4 . 5
2 5 . 9
2 7 . 7
2 9 . 7
3 2 . 2
3 5 . 2
3 8 . 9
4 3 . 4
4 9 . 1
5 6 . 4
6 5 . 8
7 8 . 2
9 5 . 3
1 1 9 . 8
1 5 7 . 5
2 2 1 . 6
3 5 3 . 0
7 6 1 . 9
5 0 - 2 5 %
2 0 . 7
2 1 . 2
2 1 . 5
2 1 . 8
2 2 . 2
2 2 . 8
2 3 . 4
2 4 . 2
2 5 . 2
2 6 . 3
2 7 . 7
2 9 . 4
3 1 . 4
3 3 . 8
3 6 . 6
3 9 . 9
4 3 . 9
4 8 . 6
5 4 . 2
6 1 . 0
6 9 . 2
7 9 . 1
C e n t r a l
G o v t = 1.2
A s s u m p t i o n
I I
w t 50% wt
2 0 . 7
2 1 . 4
2 2 . 1
2 2 . 5
2 2 . 8
2 3 . 0
2 3 . 1
2 3 . 1
2 3 . 0
2 2 . 9
2 2 . 7
2 2 . 4
2 2 . 2
2 1 . 9
2 1 . 5
2 1 . 2
2 0 . 8
2 0 . 4
2 0 . 0
1 9 . 6
1 9 . 2
5 0 - 2 5 % wt
2 0 . 7
2 1 . 4
2 1 . 4
2 1 . 2
2 0 . 8
2 0 . 3
1 9 . 7
1 9 . 0
1 8 . 3
1 7 . 5
1 6 . 7
1 5 . 9
1 5 . 1
1 4 . 4
1 3 . 6
1 2 . 8
1 2 . 1
1 1 . 3
1 0 . 6
9.9
9.2
8.6
N o t e :
Net c e n t r a l
g o v e r n m e n t
r e v e n u e s
=
G r o s s r e v e n u e s
- Net i n t e r e s t
p a y m e n t s
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
18/51
- 1 4 -
e v e n t h a t w o u l d c o n s t i t u t e a n u n s u s t a i n a b l e s i t u a t i o n , w h e r e i n o n l y
7 0 . 6 p e r c e n t o f n e t r e v e n u e s w o u l d b e
a v a i l a b l e
f o r
n o n i n t e r e s t
e x p e n d i t u r e ;
b y 2 0 1 0 / 1 1 , n e t
i n t e r e s t
p a y m e n t s w o u l d a b s o r b
n e a r l y
8 0 p e r c e n t o f n e t r e v e n u e s .
T h e n u m b e r s r e g a r d i n g t h e d e b t b u r d e n w e h a v e g i v e n i n t h e p r e -
c e d i n g p a r a g r a p h s
c l e a r l y
i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e b u d g e t of G O I w o u l d h a v e
e n t e r e d a
d i s a s t r o u s s i t u a t i o n
b y t h e t u r n o f t h e c e n t u r y , i f n e t b o r -
r o w i n g
w e r e i n c r e a s e d d u r i n g t h e n e x t t e n y e a r s a s f a s t a s d u r i n g t h e
l a s t f i v e y e a r s . T h e d e b t / G D P
r a t i o
w o u l d r i s e t o 1 1 0 p e r c e n t a n d t h e
g r o s s i n t e r e s t b u r d e n w o u l d r i s e t o
m o r e
t h a n 9 . 0 p e r c e n t
o f
G D P ,
a b s o r b i n g 6 1 - 7 7 p e r c e n t o f g o v e r n m e n t r e v e n u e s d e p e n d i n g o n w h e t h e r
r e v e n u e s e x h i b i t e d a b u o y a n c y of 1 o r 1 . 2 . E v e n t h o u g h t h e a v e r a g e
e f f e c t i v e r a t e o f i n t e r e s t
p a i d
o n d e b t ( T a b l e 7 ) w o u l d , o n o u r
a s s u m p t i o n s , b e l o w e r t h a n t h e r a t e o f g r o w t h - - a r e a l r a t e o f i n t e r e s t
o f 1 . 5 p e r c e n t a s a g a i n s t t h e
r e a l
r a t e o f g r o w t h o f 5 . 5 p e r c e n t - - t h e
d e b t
r a t i o
w o u l d c o n t i n u e t o
g r o w
b e c a u s e o f t h e
r i s i n g r a t i o
o f p r i m a r y
d e f i c i t t o G D P a n d t h e h i g h e r m a r g i n a l r a t e o f i n t e r e s t . T h e t a s k o f
r e v e r s i n g t h e t r e n d s w o u l d b e f a r m o r e d i f f i c u l t i n 2 0 0 0 / 0 1 t h a n n o w .
T a b l e 7 . I n d i a : A v e r a g e I n t e r e s t K a t e o n T o t a l D e b t
Y e a r
1 9 9 0 / 9 1
1 9 9 1 / 9 2
1 9 9 2 / 9 3
1 9 9 3 / 9 4
1 9 9 4 / 9 5
1 9 9 6 / 9 7
1 9 9 7 / 9 8
1 9 9 8 / 9 9
1 9 9 9 / 0 0
2 0 0 0 / 0 1
A s s u m p t i o n I
A s s u m p t i o n I I
6 . 5
6 . 8
6 . 9
7 . 1
7 . 3
7 . 4
7 . 6
7 . 7
7 . 8
7 . 9
6 . 5
6 . 9
7 . 1
7 . 3
7 . 4
7 . 5
7 . 6
7 . 7
7 . 8
7 . 9
8 . 0 7 . 9
N o t e :
b y
t o t a l
A v e r a g e
i n t e r e s t .
d e b t .
r a t e c a l c u l a t e d
a s
t o t a l
i n t e r e s t
d i v i d e d
I n t h e s c e n a r i o s k e t c h e d a b o v e , o n l y t h e
f i r s t r o u n d - e f f e c t o f
t h e
g r o w t h of b o r r o w i n g o r
d e f i c i t
a s
p r o p o r t i o n
o f G D P h a s b e e n c o n s i d e r e d ,
T h e i m p a c t o f t h e
f a s t r a t e
o f g r o w t h o f
d e f i c i t
a n d o f t h e d e b t / G D P
r a t i o
o n t h e r a t
e
o f
i n t e r e s t ,
t h e
r a t e
o f g r o w t h o f
G D P
, a n d t h e
r a t e
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
19/51
- 1 5 -
o f
i n f l a t i o n
h a s n o t
been
t a k e n i n t o
a c c o u n t .
B ut s u r e l y , w i t h
b o r r o w -
i n g
f r o m
t h e RB I f r o z e n a s p e r c e n t o f G DP , t h e Government w o u l d
f i n d
i t
i n c r e a s i n g l y d i f f i c u l t t o
s q u e e z e
more
f u n d s
o u t o f t h e
m a r k e t . Even
i f
o n e
assumes
t h a t t h e r a t e o f
d o m e s t i c
s a v i n g s
w o u l d
r i s e ,
s a y ,
f r o m
2 1 p e r c e n t o f G DP i n 1989/90 t o 2 3 p e r c e n t i n 2000/01, t h e
Government's
d o m e s t i c b o r r o w i n g on t h e s c a l e p o s t u l a t e d w o u l d
a b s o r b
a n i n c r e a s i n g
p r o p o r t i o n o f
d o m e s t i c
s a v i n g s , g o i n g u p t o 7 4. 2 p e r c e n t b y 2000/01
( T a b l e 8 ) . T he a b s o r p t i o n o f s u c h a h i g h p r o p o r t i o n o f p r i v a t e s a v i n g s
--government s e c t o r s a v i n g s a r e l i k e l y t o b e n e g l i g i b l e - - w o u l d n o t b e
p o s s i b l e
w i t h o u t a s t e e p i n c r e a s e i n t h e i n t e r e s t r a t e a nd s e v e r e
c r o w d i n g
o u t o f p r i v a t e i n v e s t m e n t r e s u l t i n g i n a
f a l l
i n t h e g r o w t h
r a t e .
1 /
R a n g a r a j a n
e t a l
( 1 9 9 0 )
have
a t t e m p t e d
t o p r o j e c t t h e g r o w t h o f
p u b l i c
d e b t
a n d i n t e r e s t
b u r d e n
b y f i r s t d e r i v i n g t h e
g r o w t h
o f n e t
p r i m a r y
d e f i c i t
t h r o u g h
e s t i m a t i n g n o n i n t e r e s t
r e v e n u e s
a n d n o n i n t e r e s t
e x p e n d i t u r e s o n t h e b a s i s o f
o b s e r v e d
e l a s t i c i t i e s ,
a n d
t h e n
e s t i m a t i n g
t h e
g r o w t h
o f i n t e r e s t a n d
d e b t
u s i n g t h e p r i m a r y
d e f i c i t
f i g u r e s , a n d
o n t h e b a s i s o f p l a u s i b l e
a s s u m p t i o n s
r e g a r d i n g r e l e v a n t k e y
p a r a m e t e r s .
A l t h o u g h t h e y have assumed t h e
same
g r o w t h r a t e o f
n o m i n a l
G DP a s i n o u r
e x e r c i s e ,
a n d
k e p t
c o n s t a n t t h e
r a t i o
o f e x t e r n a l b o r r o w i n g , a nd
b o r r o w -
i n g f r o m
R B I t o G D P , a s w e
have done,
t h e y a r r i v e a t
much
l a r g e r
e s t i -
mates o f
d e f i c i t
a n d debt/GDP r a t i o s t h a n o u r s . T h e i r e s t i m a t e s o f t h e
k e y r a t i o s f o r t h e y e a r 1999/2000 a r e a s g i v e n
b e l o w :
N o n i n t e r e s t
Revenue
1 6 . 0 5
As percent o f G DP i n
1999-2000
Noninterest
Expenditure
N et
Primary
Excluding Net
Lending
D e f i c i t
2 7 . 1 9
1 1 . 1
Gross
Primary
D e f i c i t Debt
1 9 . 5
1 4 9 . 7
1 / I n s t e a d o f a s s u m i n g t h a t
e a c h
m a j o r c o m p o n e n t o f d o m e s t i c b o r -
r o w i n g w o u l d
g r o w a s d u r i n g t h e
l a s t f i v e y e a r s ,
o n e c o u l d a s s u m e t h a t
t o t a l
d o m e s t i c b o r r o w i n g w o u l d
g r o w a t t h e s a m e r a t e ( 1 6 . 9 p e r c e n t p e r
a n n u m ) .
T h i s
w o u l d
i m p l y
i m p o s i n g
a
u n i f o r m
g r o w t h
r a t e
o n
a l l
c o m p o -
n e n t s e x c e p t
R B I
c r e d i t .
I f w e d i d
t h a t ,
t h e d e b t / G D P
r a t i o w o u l d
g r o w
l e s s l a s t
b u t n e v e r t h e l e s s , t h e s i t u a t i o n i n 2 0 0 0 / 0 1
w o u l d
b e q u i t e
g r a v e . T h e d e b t / G D P
r a t i o
w o u l d h a v e r i s e n t o 8 4 . 9 p e r c e n t a n d t h e
i n t e r e s t
b u r d e n
t o 7
p e r c e n t . C r o s s
i n t e r e s t
p a y m e n t s
w o u l d a b s o r b
4 9 p e r c e n t o f
r e v e n u e s
w i t h a
b u o y a n c y
o f 1 . 2 , a n d 6 2 p e r c e n t w i t h a
b u o y a n c y o f 1 . 0 .
D o m e s t i c
b o r r o w i n g w o u l d a b s o r b 4 8 . 7 p e r c e n t o f d o m e s -
t i c
s a v i n g , a s a g a i n s t 3 3 . 2 p e r c e n t i n 1 9 8 9 / 9 0 . E v e n
t h e s e f i g u r e s
i m p l y
s e v e r e d i s r u p t i o n
t o t h e e c o n o m y .
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
20/51
T
a
b
l
e
8
I
n
d
i
a
:
N
e
t
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
a
s
a
e
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
r
o
s
s
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
Y
e
a
r
1
9
8
9
/
9
0
1
9
9
0
/
9
1
1
9
9
1
/
9
2
1
9
9
2
/
9
3
1
9
9
3
/
9
4
1
9
9
4
/
9
5
1
9
9
5
/
9
6
1
9
9
6
/
9
7
1
9
9
7
/
9
8
1
9
9
8
/
9
9
1
9
9
9
/
0
0
G
D
P
R
s
.
r
o
r
e
4
3
8
,
0
9
7
4
9
0
,
6
6
9
5
4
9
5
4
9
6
1
5
4
9
5
6
8
9
3
5
4
7
7
2
,
0
7
7
8
6
4
,
7
2
6
9
6
8
,
4
9
3
1
,
0
8
4
,
7
1
2
1
2
1
4
8
7
7
1
3
6
6
6
3
G
r
o
s
s
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
R
s
.
C
r
o
r
e
9
2
,
0
0
0
1
0
4
,
0
2
2
1
1
7
6
0
3
1
1
5
0
2
7
9
1
6
9
,
8
5
7
1
9
1
,
9
6
9
2
1
6
9
4
2
2
4
5
1
4
5
2
7
6
9
9
2
3
1
2
9
5
2
G
r
o
s
s
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
t
o
G
(
)
2
1
.
0
0
2
1
.
2
0
2
1
.
4
0
2
1
.
6
0
2
1
.
8
0
2
2
.
0
0
2
2
.
2
0
2
2
.
4
0
2
2
.
6
0
2
2
.
8
0
2
3
.
0
0
N
e
t
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
R
s
.
C
r
o
r
e
3
0
,
4
9
8
3
4
3
5
8
1
5
6
7
7
8
6
9
9
5
6
8
3
1
1
4
7
2
2
1
1
8
4
,
3
0
0
2
3
2
,
0
6
7
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
R
s
.
C
r
o
r
e
3
0
,
4
9
8
3
4
1
5
1
3
8
,
2
4
9
4
4
7
9
7
9
5
6
0
1
8
5
6
7
,
4
0
7
7
8
4
5
5
5
9
N
D
o
m
e
s
t
i
c
B
o
r
r
o
w
i
n
g
t
o
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
(
)
3
3
.
1
5
3
4
.
9
5
3
7
.
0
6
3
9
.
5
3
4
4
5
.
8
4
4
9
.
8
4
5
6
0
.
0
5
6
6
.
5
4
7
4
.
1
5
A
s
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
I
(
)
3
3
.
1
5
3
2
.
8
3
3
2
.
5
2
3
2
.
2
2
3
1
.
9
3
3
1
.
6
4
3
1
.
3
5
3
1
.
0
7
3
0
.
8
0
3
0
.
5
3
3
0
.
2
6
-
8/10/2019 The Growth of Indian Public Debt- Raja. J. Chelliah IMF Report
21/51
- 17 -
The
main
r ea s on s f o r Ra n gara ja n and o t h e r s o b t a i n i n g l a r g e r e s t i -
mates than
und e r
our Assumption I
seem
t o be t h e h i g h e r e x p e n d i t u r e
e l a s t i c i t y d e r i v e d t h r o u g h t h e us e o f l o n g e r p e r i o d data (we
have
used
t h e t r e n d s o f t h e f i v e y e a r s p r e c e d i n g
1990/91)
and th e a p p l i c a t i o n o f
t h e m a r gi n a l r a t e o f
i n t e r e s t
t o t o t a l d e b t . On t h e o t h e r h an d , t h e y
seem t o be o v e r e s t i m a t i n g t h e r a t e o f
i n t e r e s t
r e c e i v e d by t h e G o v e r n -
ment. However t h a t may b e, t h e tw o e x e r c i s e s p o i n t t o t h esame con-
c l u s i o n ,
nam e l y ,
t h a t
w i t h th e
c o n t i n u a t i o n
o f t h e p r e s en t s ta n c e o f
f i s c a l
p o l i c y ,
t h e
debt/GDP r a t i o
and the
r a t i o
o f
i n t e r e s t
on p u b l i c
debt to GDP would co ntin ue to g r o w , and that by the
t u r n
o f t h e c e n t u r y ,
t h e f i s c a l
s i t u a t i o n
would
have
a l r e a d y c au se d g r e a t
harm
t o t h e
economy. A l t h o u g h t h e m a r g i na l r a t e o f
i n t e r e s t
on b o r r o wi n g i s s t i l l
b e l o w t h e assumed g r o w t h r a t e , w i t h p r i m ar y d e f i c i t r i s i n g a s a p e r c e n t
of
GDP, t h e
debt/GDP r a t i o
w oul d c o n ti n u e t o
r i s e
e v en
a f t e r
2001 unl es s
t h e r e
ar e r a d i c a l
p o l i c y
c o r r e c t i o n s .
I t
must
b e p o i n t e d out
that
we
have
c ou n t e d o n l y t h e b o r r o wi n g and
d e f i c i t of the GOI, which is of cour se the
ma jor
b o r r o w e r . B ut s t a t e
g o v e r nm e n t s a l s o b o r r o w from the market, from f i n a n c i a l
i n s t i t u t i o n s ,
and t h r ou g h p r o vi d en t fun d
d e p o s i t s .
B e s i d e s , s e l e c t e d
p u b l i c
e n t e r -
p r i s e s
have been
a l l o w e d t o b o r r o w from the market w i t h t a x c o n c e s s i o n s .
They have a l s o b e e n p e r m i t t e d to i n c u r
e x t e r n a l
d e b t . I t i s t h e t o t a l
demand f o r fu nd s o f t h e
p u b l i c s e c t o r t h at must
be k e p t i nmind w h i l e
c o n s i d e r i n g t h e p o s s i b i l i t y of crow ding out of p r i v a t e i n v e s t m e n t , th e
p r e s s u r e o n
i n t e r e s t
r a t e s , and the i m p l i c a t i o n s f o r b a l a n c e o f
payment s .
Government has a c a p t i v e market f r o m w h ic h i t a t t e m p t s t o o b t a i n a
g