supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary...

37
Supplementary Materials Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: A Meta-Analysis By S. Araújo et al., 2014, Journal of Educational Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000006

Transcript of supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary...

Page 1: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Supplementary Materials

Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: A Meta-Analysis

By S. Araújo et al., 2014, Journal of Educational Psychology

http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000006

Page 2: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Table S1Characteristics of the Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis

Reference r N Domain of Reading Reading Score RAN Stimulus RAN: total

RAN: tokens Grade Reading Group Consistency of

Orthography

Anthony et al. (2007) 0,2 389 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 28 4 pre-readers average readers opaque

Araújo et al. (2010) 0,7 22 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 not coded impaired readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2010) 0,53 22 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 not coded average readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,73 17 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers impaired readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,66 17 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers impaired readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,74 17 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers impaired readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,69 17 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers impaired readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,53 24 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers average readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,04 24 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers average readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,34 24 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers average readers intermediate

Araújo et al. (2011) 0,09 24 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers average readers intermediate

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,53 57 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,69 57 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,58 57 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,54 57 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,64 57 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,52 57 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,6 57 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,7 57 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2010) 0,57 57 text reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,62 103 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,58 103 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,14 103 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,07 103 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,59 103 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,55 103 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,58 103 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Babayiit & Stainthorp (2011) 0,51 103 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded average readers transparent

Badian (1993) 0,2 170 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1993) 0,18 170 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1993) 0,47 170 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1993) 0,45 170 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1994) 0,27 117 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1994) 0,48 117 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1994) 0,43 117 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Badian (1994) 0,39 117 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Barth et al. (2009) 0,34 527 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Page 3: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Barth et al. (2009) 0,5 527 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Barth et al. (2009) 0,64 527 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Barth et al. (2009) 0,54 527 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Barth et al. (2009) 0,34 527 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Barth et al. (2009) 0,56 527 text reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Barth et al. (2010) 0,32 236 not coded accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Barth et al. (2010) 0,39 236 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Barth et al. (2010) 0,54 236 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bekebrede, van & Share (2009) 0,7 72 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Bekebrede, van & Share (2009) 0,63 72 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded not coded opaque

Berends & Reitsma (2006) 0,3 74 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Berends & Reitsma (2006) 0,37 74 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Berends & Reitsma (2006) 0,26 74 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Blachman (1984) 0,16 34 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Blachman (1984) 0,67 32 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Blachman (1984) 0,18 34 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Blachman (1984) 0,61 29 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Blachman (1984) 0,36 34 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Bowers (1993) 0,51 36 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers (1993) 0,45 36 text reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers (1993) 0,77 36 text reading fluency-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers (1995) 0,41 38 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 intermediate readers not coded opaque

Bowers (1995) 0,33 38 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 intermediate readers not coded opaque

Bowers (1995) 0,45 38 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 intermediate readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,3 43 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,35 43 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,44 38 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,5 38 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,43 43 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,47 43 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,47 40 word reading fluency-based letter naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,49 40 word reading fluency-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,56 40 word reading fluency-based letter naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowers & Swanson (1991) 0,57 40 word reading fluency-based digit naming 48 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Bowey & Miller (2007) 0,28 52 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Bowey & Miller (2007) 0,07 52 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,05 65 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,38 65 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,35 65 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,14 65 word reading accuracy-based color naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,45 65 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Page 4: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,31 65 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,12 65 word reading accuracy-based color naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,51 65 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, McGuigan & Ruschena (2005) 0,33 65 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 24 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,24 125 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,41 125 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,21 125 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,16 125 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,31 125 word reading accuracy-based color naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,46 125 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,34 125 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Bowey, Storey & Ferguson (2004) 0,19 125 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 24 8 not coded average readers opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,42 49 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,21 49 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,44 49 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,27 49 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,44 49 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,25 49 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,35 49 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cardoso-Martins & Pennington (2004) 0,33 49 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Claessen, Leitão & Barrett (2010) 0,64 69 not coded accuracy-based not coded 36 6 beginning readers average readers opaque

Cobbold, Passenger & Terrell (2003) 0,27 68 not coded accuracy-based picture naming 20 20 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cobbold, Passenger & Terrell (2003) 0,29 68 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 20 20 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cobbold, Passenger & Terrell (2003) 0,36 68 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 20 20 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cobbold, Passenger & Terrell (2003) 0,28 68 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 20 20 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2000) 0,54 75 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2000) 0,62 75 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2000b) 0,54 75 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2000b) 0,68 75 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2000b) 0,74 75 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2003) 0,34 75 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2003) 0,62 75 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2003) 0,39 75 word reading accuracy-based color naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2003) 0,7 75 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton (2003) 0,64 383 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Compton et al. (2010) 0,49 355 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cronin (2011) 0,42 121 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Cronin (2011) 0,5 121 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Cunningham (2006) 0,12 35 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cunningham (2006) 0,38 35 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cunningham (2006) 0,18 35 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Page 5: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Cunningham (2006) 0,09 35 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cunningham et al. (2002) 0,27 34 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cunningham et al. (2002) 0,29 34 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cunningham et al. (2002) 0,37 34 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Cutting & Denckla (2001) 0,56 79 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,16 87 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,44 87 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,5 87 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,24 87 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,31 87 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,63 87 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,63 87 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das, Janzen & Georgiou (2007) 0,35 87 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das,Georgiou & Janzen (2008) 0,47 71 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das,Georgiou & Janzen (2008) 0,32 71 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das,Georgiou & Janzen (2008) 0,55 71 word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Das,Georgiou & Janzen (2008) 0,33 71 word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

David et al. (2007) 0,48 53 word reading accuracy-based not coded 32 4 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

David et al. (2007) 0,49 53 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 32 4 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

de Jong (2011) 0,58 71 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,34 71 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,53 71 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,36 71 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,5 74 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,5 74 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,27 74 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,29 74 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,53 127 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,53 127 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,29 127 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong (2011) 0,33 127 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (1999) 0,49 166 not coded fluency-based picture naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,61 141 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 16 7 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,47 141 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 16 7 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,4 141 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 16 7 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,36 141 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 16 7 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,31 141 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,34 141 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,31 141 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,28 141 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,33 141 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 16 9 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 6: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,58 141 word reading fluency-based letter naming 16 9 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,45 141 word reading fluency-based digit naming 16 9 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

de Jong & van der Leij (2002) 0,33 141 word reading fluency-based picture naming 16 9 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Fuchs et al. (2011) 0,54 318 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Fuchs et al. (2011) 0,48 318 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Fuchs et al. (2011) 0,62 318 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Fuchs et al. (2011) 0,55 318 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Fuchs et al. (2011) 0,64 318 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Fuchs et al. (2011) 0,61 318 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers not coded opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2009) 0,25 737 non-word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2009) 0,28 737 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2009) 0,33 169 non-word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2009) 0,32 169 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,46 735 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,48 735 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,54 735 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,55 735 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,48 750 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,45 750 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,53 750 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,49 750 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,58 182 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,45 182 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,65 182 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,5 182 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,51 230 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,39 230 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,52 230 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Furnes & Samuelsson (2011) 0,39 230 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,28 51 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,5 51 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,2 51 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,38 51 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,57 70 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,59 70 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,58 70 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Georgiou et al. (2011) 0,7 70 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2008) 0,39 50 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2008) 0,32 50 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2008) 0,55 50 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2008) 0,39 50 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Page 7: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2009) 0,49 50 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2009) 0,29 50 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2009) 0,35 50 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Das, & Hayward (2009) 0,26 50 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0 62 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,29 62 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,26 62 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,42 62 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,36 62 word reading fluency-based color naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,43 62 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,28 62 word reading fluency-based color naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2006) 0,43 62 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,17 40 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,28 40 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,64 40 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,68 40 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,38 40 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,55 40 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,44 40 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Liao (2008) 0,59 40 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,2 110 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,39 110 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,4 110 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,56 110 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,42 110 word reading fluency-based color naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,6 110 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,41 70 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,46 70 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,35 70 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,74 70 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,4 70 word reading fluency-based color naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Papadopoulos (2008) 0,71 70 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2009) 0,14 60 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2009) 0,22 60 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2009) 0,55 60 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou, Parrila & Kirby (2009) 0,55 60 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,11 48 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,13 48 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,27 48 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,18 48 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,29 48 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Page 8: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,4 48 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,08 48 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,3 48 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,28 48 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,26 48 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,35 48 word reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,39 48 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,12 48 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,44 48 text reading fluency-based letter naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Georgiou et al. (2008) 0,39 48 text reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Havey,Story & Buker (2002) 0,49 81 word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Høien-Tengesdal (2010) 0,24 467 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Høien-Tengesdal (2010) 0,15 467 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 48 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Høien-Tengesdal (2010) 0,13 467 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Høien-Tengesdal & Tønnessen (2011) 0,32 531 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 48 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Høien-Tengesdal & Tønnessen (2011) 0,34 531 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 48 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Høien-Tengesdal & Tønnessen (2011) 0,34 476 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 48 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Høien-Tengesdal & Tønnessen (2011) 0,3 476 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 48 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Holopainen et al. (2001) 0,39 91 non-word reading fluency-based not coded 50 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Huff, Sorenson & Dancer (2002) 0,61 31 text reading fluency-based picture naming 120 n.a. intermediate readers average readers opaque

Katz & Shankweiler (1985) 0,07 16 not coded accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Katz & Shankweiler (1985) 0,58 16 not coded accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Katz & Shankweiler (1985) 0,12 16 not coded accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Katz & Shankweiler (1985) 0,04 16 not coded accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,76 17 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,68 17 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,69 17 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,78 17 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,78 17 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,42 123 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,44 123 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,54 123 reading comprehension fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,54 123 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,66 123 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,37 123 text reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2006) 0,38 123 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,4 158 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,27 158 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,17 158 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,42 158 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,43 158 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Page 9: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,22 158 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,5 158 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,38 158 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,32 158 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,52 158 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,41 158 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,2 158 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,57 158 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,43 158 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,28 158 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,37 158 text reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,17 158 text reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,26 158 text reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,38 158 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,17 158 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Katzir et al. (2008) 0,31 158 text reading fluency-based picture naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Lachance & Mazzocco (2006) 0,25 120 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Lachance & Mazzocco (2006) 0,34 120 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Lachance & Mazzocco (2006) 0,37 120 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Lachance & Mazzocco (2006) 0,48 120 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Landerl (2001) 0,18 78 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Landerl (2001) 0,68 78 non-word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Landerl (2001) 0,18 78 reading comprehension fluency-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Landerl (2001) 0,33 78 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Landerl (2001) 0,7 78 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Landerl & Wimmer (2008) 0,45 356 not coded fluency-based picture naming 32 4 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Lee (2008) 0,62 117 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Lee (2008) 0,59 117 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Lee (2008) 0,69 117 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Lee (2008) 0,63 117 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,4 85 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,33 85 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,08 85 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,45 85 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,36 85 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,27 85 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,6 85 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,54 85 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,33 85 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,65 85 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,48 85 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Page 10: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Manis & Doi (2000) 0,26 85 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis, Seidenberg & Doi (1999) 0,6 85 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis, Seidenberg & Doi (1999) 0,5 85 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis, Seidenberg & Doi (1999) 0,65 85 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis, Seidenberg & Doi (1999) 0,57 85 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis, Seidenberg & Doi (1999) 0,68 85 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Manis, Seidenberg & Doi (1999) 0,54 85 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang (1996) 0,44 136 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang (1996) 0,38 136 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 40 8 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang (1996) 0,47 136 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang (1996) 0,39 136 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 40 8 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang&Kail (2002) 0,58 109 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 25 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang&Kail (2002) 0,59 109 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 25 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang&Kail (2002) 0,45 109 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 25 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

McBride-Chang&Manis (1996) 0,49 51 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McBride-Chang&Manis (1996) 0,52 51 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McBride-Chang&Manis (1996) 0,33 51 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McBride-Chang&Manis (1996) 0,06 74 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

McBride-Chang&Manis (1996) 0,04 74 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

McBride-Chang&Manis (1996) 0,16 74 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 8 intermediate readers average readers opaque

McLean et al. (2009) 0,2 86 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

McLean et al. (2009) 0,29 86 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

McLean et al. (2009) 0,26 86 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers average readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,08 24 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,06 24 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,39 24 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,35 24 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,42 24 text reading fluency-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,46 24 text reading fluency-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,24 27 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,33 27 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,26 27 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,22 27 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,24 27 text reading fluency-based color naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

McLean et al. (2011) 0,08 27 text reading fluency-based picture naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,26 160 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,26 160 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,39 64 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,41 64 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,47 64 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,33 64 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Page 11: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,32 64 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,29 64 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,29 64 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,29 64 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 intermediate readers impaired readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,21 122 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,24 122 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Meyer et al. (1998) 0,18 122 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 intermediate readers average readers opaque

Moll et al. (2009) 0,39 39 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,22 39 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,49 34 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,41 34 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,38 45 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. beginning readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,47 45 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. beginning readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,43 40 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,56 40 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,62 471 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 9 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,55 471 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 9 intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,66 169 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,63 169 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,57 57 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,54 57 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,56 52 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers average readers transparent

Moll et al. (2009) 0,46 52 word reading fluency-based digit naming n.a. n.a. intermediate readers average readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,36 15 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,11 16 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 30 n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,75 15 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 30 n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,2 16 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 20 n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,66 15 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 20 n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,4 16 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 20 n.a. beginning readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,09 22 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,08 19 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 30 n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,42 22 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 30 n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,54 19 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 20 n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,18 22 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 20 n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,13 19 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 20 n.a. intermediate readers impaired readers transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,23 77 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,11 74 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 30 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,42 77 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 30 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,28 74 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 20 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,31 77 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 20 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,26 74 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 20 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 12: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,25 78 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,16 74 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 30 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,36 78 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 30 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,38 74 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 20 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,2 78 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 20 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Muller & Brady (2001) 0,38 74 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 20 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,58 28 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,8 28 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,9 28 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,76 28 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,5 28 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,77 28 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,87 28 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Murphy, Pollatsek & Well (1988) 0,75 28 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 n.a. advanced readers not coded opaque

Olofsson (2000) 0,44 69 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Olofsson (2000) 0,49 69 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Parrila, Kirby & McQuarrie (2004) 0,52 117 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 32 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Parrila, Kirby & McQuarrie (2004) 0,48 117 word reading accuracy-based color naming 32 4 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,54 35 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,67 35 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,69 35 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,76 35 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,63 21 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,8 21 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,82 21 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Pennington et al. (2001) 0,88 21 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Pham, Fine & Semrud-Clikeman (2011) 0,48 104 text reading fluency-based color naming 36 n.a. intermediate readers average readers opaque

Pham, Fine & Semrud-Clikeman (2011) 0,6 104 text reading fluency-based letter naming 36 n.a. intermediate readers average readers opaque

Pham, Fine & Semrud-Clikeman (2011) 0,52 104 text reading fluency-based digit naming 36 n.a. intermediate readers average readers opaque

Pham, Fine & Semrud-Clikeman (2011) 0,47 104 text reading fluency-based picture naming 36 n.a. intermediate readers average readers opaque

Plaza & Cohen (2003) 0,62 267 not coded fluency-based letter naming 48 4 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Plaza & Cohen (2003) 0,46 267 not coded fluency-based digit naming 48 4 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Plaza & Cohen (2003) 0,42 267 not coded fluency-based picture naming 48 4 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Roman et al. (2009) 0,15 33 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,27 33 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,17 33 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,33 33 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,05 33 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,05 33 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,33 33 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,31 33 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Page 13: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Roman et al. (2009) 0,14 26 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,31 26 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,36 26 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Roman et al. (2009) 0,58 26 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 advanced readers unselected sample opaque

Saiegh-Haddad (2005) 0,36 42 non-word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Savage et al. (2005) 0,51 61 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

Savage et al. (2005) 0,49 61 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

Savage et al. (2005) 0,52 61 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

Scarborough (1998) 0,15 55 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 48 n.a. beginning readers not coded opaque

Scarborough (1998) 0,18 55 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 48 n.a. beginning readers not coded opaque

Scarborough (1998) 0,3 55 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 48 n.a. beginning readers not coded opaque

Schatschneider et al. (2002) 0,59 591 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Schatschneider et al. (2002) 0,6 591 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Schatschneider et al. (2002) 0,68 591 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Schatschneider et al. (2002) 0,35 532 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Schatschneider et al. (2002) 0,39 532 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Schatschneider et al. (2002) 0,58 532 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Scheltinga, van der Leij & Struiksma (2010) 0,55 74 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 9 not coded impaired readers transparent

Speece & Ritchey (2005) 0,28 242 not coded accuracy-based picture naming 36 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Speece & Ritchey (2005) 0,18 242 word reading fluency-based picture naming 36 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Speece & Ritchey (2005) 0,19 242 text reading fluency-based picture naming 36 5 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Spring (1975) 0,53 44 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Sprugevica & Høien (2003_a) 0,2 76 word reading accuracy-based color naming 180 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Sprugevica & Høien (2003_a) 0,22 76 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 180 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Sprugevica & Høien (2003_b) 0,32 70 word reading accuracy-based color naming 180 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Sprugevica & Høien (2003_b) 0,33 70 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 180 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Sprugevica & Høien (2003_b) 0,21 70 text reading accuracy-based color naming 180 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Sprugevica & Høien (2003_b) 0,13 70 text reading accuracy-based picture naming 180 6 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Stage et al. (2003) 0,34 128 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Stage et al. (2003) 0,55 128 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Swanson (2011) 0,7 104 non-word reading fluency-based not coded 36 6 beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Troia & Roth (1996) 0,87 22 not coded accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Troia & Roth (1996) 0,74 22 not coded accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Troia & Roth (1996) 0,76 22 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Troia & Roth (1996) 0,64 22 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 not coded average readers opaque

Vadasy, Sanders, & Abbott (2008) 0,36 79 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Vadasy, Sanders, & Abbott (2008) 0,44 79 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 36 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Vadasy, Sanders, & Abbott (2008) 0,54 79 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,62 47 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,61 47 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,29 47 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Page 14: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,62 47 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,59 47 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,21 47 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,56 47 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,54 47 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,22 47 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,62 175 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,54 175 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,42 175 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,65 175 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,56 175 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,4 175 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,61 175 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,57 175 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,44 175 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,47 194 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,42 194 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,51 194 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,53 194 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,51 194 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,51 194 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,46 194 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,41 194 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 194 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,51 200 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,48 200 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,48 200 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,47 200 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 200 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,47 200 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,48 200 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,47 200 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,49 200 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample intermediate

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 81 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,41 81 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,38 81 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,51 81 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,43 81 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,36 81 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,48 81 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,38 81 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 15: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,31 81 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,43 203 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,33 203 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,31 203 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,35 203 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,31 203 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,31 203 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,39 203 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,37 203 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,39 203 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,45 202 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,41 202 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,43 202 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,49 202 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,46 202 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,37 202 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,47 202 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,44 202 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,44 202 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,59 185 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,56 185 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 185 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,55 185 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,55 185 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 185 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,6 185 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,57 185 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,53 185 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,34 216 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,39 216 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,33 216 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,26 216 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,38 216 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,34 216 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,26 216 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,38 216 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,31 216 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,26 234 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,37 234 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,2 234 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,23 234 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 16: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,32 234 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,25 234 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,24 234 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,37 234 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,29 234 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,38 245 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,42 245 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,23 245 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 245 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,52 245 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,37 245 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,41 245 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,46 245 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,33 245 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,47 259 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 259 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,23 259 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,5 259 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,53 259 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,31 259 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,46 259 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,49 259 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen et al. (2010) 0,29 259 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,34 210 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,4 210 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,33 210 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,26 210 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,39 210 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,34 210 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,25 210 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,38 210 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,3 210 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,28 285 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,44 285 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,21 285 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,26 285 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,39 285 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,25 285 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,27 285 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,44 285 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,28 285 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 17: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,36 259 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,4 259 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,27 259 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,49 259 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,52 259 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,39 259 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,4 259 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,46 259 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,35 259 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,46 263 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,49 263 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,23 263 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,5 263 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,53 263 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,3 263 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,45 263 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,49 263 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,29 263 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,53 226 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,48 226 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,45 226 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,59 226 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,63 226 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,44 226 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,62 226 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,61 226 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,51 226 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,47 180 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,49 180 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,31 180 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,52 180 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,52 180 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,38 180 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,52 180 word reading fluency-based letter naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,54 180 word reading fluency-based digit naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert (2010) 0,36 180 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,58 174 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 n.a. not coded unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,29 174 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 10 not coded unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,31 132 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,25 132 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 n.a. intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,29 132 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 10 intermediate readers unselected sample transparent

Page 18: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,21 111 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 n.a. advanced readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,12 111 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 n.a. advanced readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,27 111 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 n.a. advanced readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,43 130 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 n.a. advanced readers unselected sample transparent

van den bos et al. (2002) 0,44 130 word reading fluency-based not coded 50 n.a. advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,3 226 word reading accuracy-based color naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,43 226 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,36 226 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,35 226 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,33 226 word reading fluency-based color naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,53 226 word reading fluency-based letter naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,46 226 word reading fluency-based digit naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Verhagen, Aarnoutse & van Leeuwe (2008) 0,36 226 word reading fluency-based picture naming 40 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Wagner et al. (1993) 0,38 89 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 30 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner et al. (1993) 0,32 89 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner et al. (1993) 0,51 95 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 30 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner et al. (1993) 0,55 95 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner, Torgesen & Rashotte (1994) 0,37 244 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 30 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner, Torgesen & Rashotte (1994) 0,36 244 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner, Torgesen & Rashotte (1994) 0,5 244 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 30 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Wagner, Torgesen & Rashotte (1994) 0,45 244 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 n.a. pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Wolf et al. (2002) 0,34 144 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Wolf et al. (2002) 0,36 144 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Wolf et al. (2002) 0,41 144 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,2 83 not coded fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,51 83 not coded fluency-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,55 83 not coded fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,18 83 not coded fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,32 83 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,39 83 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,43 83 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,27 83 reading comprehension accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,26 83 text reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,45 83 text reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,49 83 text reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wolf,Bally & Morris (1986) 0,17 83 text reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers not coded opaque

Wood (2009) 0,44 74 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Wood (2009) 0,58 74 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Wood (2009) 0,53 74 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 intermediate readers unselected sample opaque

Young & Bowers (1995) 0,51 85 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 advanced readers not coded opaque

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,25 166 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 19: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,15 166 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,15 166 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,23 166 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,27 181 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,3 181 non-word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,19 181 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Ziegler et al. (2010) 0,28 181 word reading fluency-based picture naming 15 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Manis, Seidenberg, Stallings, et al (1999) 0,11 72 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Manis, Seidenberg, Stallings, et al (1999) 0,35 72 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 beginning readers impaired readers opaque

Torgesen & Davis (1996) 0,29 40 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 30 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,08 54 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,19 54 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,08 54 text reading not coded color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,09 54 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,41 54 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,49 54 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,35 54 text reading not coded letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,31 54 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Jackson, Donaldson, & Mills (1993) 0,78 123 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Jackson, Donaldson, & Mills (1993) 0,65 123 text reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Jackson, Donaldson, & Mills (1993) 0,6 123 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Jackson, Donaldson, & Mills (1993) 0,65 123 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 n.a. beginning readers unselected sample opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,42 102 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,71 102 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,3 102 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,67 102 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,39 102 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,61 102 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,33 102 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,54 102 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,31 102 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,22 102 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,36 102 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Berninger et al. (2001) 0,32 102 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Bowers, Steffy & Swanson (1986) 0,57 39 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded unselected sample opaque

Bowers, Steffy & Swanson (1986) 0,72 39 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded unselected sample opaque

Bowers, Steffy & Swanson (1986) 0,44 39 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded unselected sample opaque

Bowers, Steffy & Swanson (1986) 0,28 39 word reading accuracy-based color naming 30 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Bowers, Steffy & Swanson (1986) 0,51 39 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 30 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Bowers, Steffy & Swanson (1986) 0,11 39 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 30 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Christo & Davis (2008) 0,62 65 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Page 20: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Christo & Davis (2008) 0,51 65 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Christo & Davis (2008) 0,46 65 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 n.a. not coded impaired readers opaque

Compton et al. (2002) 0,38 307 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

Compton et al. (2002) 0,35 307 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 5 not coded unselected sample opaque

Compton et al. (2002) 0,48 307 word reading accuracy-based not coded 75 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Compton et al. (2002) 0,42 307 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 75 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,49 54 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,41 54 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,31 54 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,19 54 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,08 54 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,09 54 reading comprehension accuracy-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,35 54 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Cornwall (1992) 0,08 54 word reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Meisinger, Bloom & Hynd (2010) 0,53 50 word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Meisinger, Bloom & Hynd (2010) 0,44 50 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 72 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Meisinger, Bloom & Hynd (2010) 0,48 50 reading comprehension accuracy-based not coded 72 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Meisinger, Bloom & Hynd (2010) 0,62 50 word reading fluency-based not coded 72 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,47 65 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,6 65 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,15 65 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,18 65 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,5 65 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,55 65 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,12 65 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Savage,Pillay, & Melidona (2008) 0,15 65 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,46 109 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,48 109 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,46 109 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,51 109 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,45 109 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,46 109 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,41 109 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,47 109 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,46 109 text reading accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,38 109 text reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,47 109 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,41 109 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,45 109 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,36 109 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,42 109 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Page 21: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Thomson et al. (2005) 0,33 109 reading comprehension accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 not coded impaired readers opaque

Griffiths & Snowling (2001) 0,35 58 word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 n.a. not coded not coded opaque

Griffiths & Snowling (2001) 0,42 58 non-word reading accuracy-based not coded 50 n.a. not coded not coded opaque

Albuquerque (2012) 0,25 70 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,19 70 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,32 70 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,35 70 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,44 70 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,41 70 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,57 70 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,51 70 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,44 69 word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,34 69 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,54 69 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,3 69 text reading fluency-based color naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,37 69 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,39 69 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,53 69 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Albuquerque (2012) 0,33 69 text reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample intermediate

Apel et al. (2012) 0,11 56 reading comprehension accuracy-based letter naming 72 6 not coded average readers opaque

Caravolas et al. (2012) 0,42 185 word reading accuracy-based not coded 40 5 pre-readers unselected sample opaque

Caravolas et al. (2012) 0,36 184 word reading accuracy-based not coded 40 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Caravolas et al. (2012) 0,53 132 word reading accuracy-based not coded 40 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Caravolas et al. (2012) 0,4 174 word reading accuracy-based not coded 40 5 pre-readers unselected sample transparent

Georgiou et al. (2012) 0,68 70 word reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2012) 0,5 70 word reading fluency-based picture naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2012) 0,6 70 text reading fluency-based digit naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2012) 0,49 70 text reading fluency-based picture naming 36 6 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2013) 0,56 65 not coded fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2013) 0,35 65 not coded fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2013) 0,61 65 not coded fluency-based digit naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Georgiou et al. (2013) 0,69 65 not coded fluency-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Kendeou et al. (2012) 0,46 286 word reading fluency-based digit naming 20 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Kendeou et al. (2012) 0,48 286 word reading fluency-based letter naming 20 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Kendeou et al. (2012) 0,36 286 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 20 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Kendeou et al. (2012) 0,42 286 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 20 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Park & Lombardio (2013) 0,52 28 word reading fluency-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Park & Lombardio (2013) 0,37 28 word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Park & Lombardio (2013) 0,54 28 text reading fluency-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Park & Lombardio (2013) 0,56 37 word reading fluency-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Park & Lombardio (2013) 0,38 37 word reading accuracy-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Page 22: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Park & Lombardio (2013) 0,29 37 text reading fluency-based not coded 36 6 not coded impaired readers opaque

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,42 107 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,52 107 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,51 107 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,53 107 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,19 107 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,61 107 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,37 107 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Protopapas et al. (2013) 0,54 107 word reading fluency-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert(2013) 0,52 1284 word reading fluency-based not coded 30 5 not coded unselected sample transparent

Vaessen & Blomert(2013) 0,47 1284 non-word reading fluency-based not coded 30 5 not coded unselected sample transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,29 80 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers impaired readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,25 80 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers impaired readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,28 80 text reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers impaired readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,44 80 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers impaired readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,55 80 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers impaired readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,48 80 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers impaired readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,33 189 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,33 189 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,42 188 text reading accuracy-based picture naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,57 189 word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,53 189 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Kairaluoma et al. (2013) 0,47 189 text reading fluency-based letter naming 50 5 advanced readers average readers transparent

Nelson et al. (2012) 0,34 116 word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Nelson et al. (2012) 0,42 116 word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Nelson et al. (2012) 0,33 104 non-word reading accuracy-based color naming 36 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Nelson et al. (2012) 0,42 104 non-word reading accuracy-based picture naming 36 6 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,55 79 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 10 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,65 79 word reading fluency-based digit naming 48 10 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,69 79 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 48 10 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,31 79 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 10 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,4 79 word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 10 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,43 79 non-word reading accuracy-based digit naming 48 10 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,6 79 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 48 25 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,77 79 word reading fluency-based letter naming 48 25 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,75 79 non-word reading fluency-based letter naming 48 25 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,52 79 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 48 25 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,57 79 word reading accuracy-based letter naming 48 25 not coded unselected sample opaque

Warmington et al. (2012) 0,45 79 non-word reading accuracy-based letter naming 48 25 not coded unselected sample opaque

van den Boer (2012) 0,36 188 word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

van den Boer (2012) 0,38 188 non-word reading fluency-based digit naming 50 5 beginning readers unselected sample transparent

Page 23: supp.apa.orgsupp.apa.org/.../edu0000006/edu.araujo.SUPP.FINAL.docx  · Web viewSupplementary Materials. Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: a. Meta-Analysis. By S.

Note: n.a. = not available.