Springfield Station - WordPress.com · Springfield Station Bioswale Case Study By: Hannah Cooley...
Transcript of Springfield Station - WordPress.com · Springfield Station Bioswale Case Study By: Hannah Cooley...
Springfield StationBioswale Case Study
Springfield StationBioswale Case Study
By: Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young
University of OregonArch 497
Walter GrondzikJune 1, 2006
UPDATED: JULY 2011
Springfield StationBioswale Case Study
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7
Description ...................................................................................................... 8
Questions ...................................................................................................... 10
Hypotheses .................................................................................................... 11
Methodology .................................................................................................. 12
Data Analysis ................................................................................................. 14
Conclusions ................................................................................................... 19
Design Lessons Learned ................................................................................. 20
References ..................................................................................................... 21
Definitions of key words used: (http://www.stormwaterauthority.org/gloassary.aspx)
Stormwater: Water from rain, irrigation, garden hoses or other activities that picks up pollutants (cigarette butts, trash, automotive fluids, used oil, paint, fertilizers and pesticides, lawn and garden clippings and pet waste) from streets, parking lots, driveways and yards and carries then through the storm drain system and straight to bodies of water.
Runoff: Water originating from rainfall and other precipitation that ultimately flows into drainage facilities, rivers, streams, springs, seeps, ponds, lakes, and wetlands as well as shallow groundwater.
Bioswale: A long, gently sloped, vegetated ditch designed to filter pollutants from stormwater. Grass is the most common vegetation, but wetland vegetation can be used if the soil is saturated.
6
INTRODUCTIONThe newly developed Lane Transit District (LTD) Springfield Station is acknowledged for its inno-
vative and environmentally friendly design. Located at 355 South A Street in Springfield, Oregon,
it is the main circulation hub for the LTD buses operating in Springfield. The station includes a
series of environmental features such as rainwater catchment device (see photo below), and a
system of bioswales to help reduce and clean stormwater runoff from the site. There are three
bioswales on site, two function as major elements and one as a minor element. The two major
bioswales are on the back corners of the site, while the minor bioswale, which is referred to as
a platform garden, runs in between the bus shelter structures.
The landscape architect, Brian McCarthy, informed us that the intent of the bioswales is to
mimic natural filtration processes by treating the quantity and quality of stormwater. The goal
of the bioswales on site is to reduce and slow runoff, increase water quality by decreasing the
three major pollutants of stormwater, and be an aesthetically pleasing feature. The three major
pollutants that the bioswale is designed to decrease are sediment pollution, petroleum-based
pollutants, and heavy metals.
When we began developing our case study, we immediately decided that our main goal was to
focus on some aspect of green design performance, and narrowed it down to the performance
of the largest bioswale at the Springfield Station. Choosing water quality as our parameter, our
desire was to see if this element was functioning at the level that it was initially intended. Basi-
cally, we wanted to see if the resulting design is effective.
The entrance of the Springfield Station with view of the rainwater catchment system.
Springfield Vicinity Map with Willa-mette River. Yellow rectangle shows site location. (Google Map)
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
7
DESCRIPTIONThe Springfield Station, located off of Main Street in Springfield, Oregon, was a collaboration
between three design firms. The firms’ intentions in the design of the transit station were to
utilize the latest in sustainable technologies. Through the combination of a stormwater manage-
ment system, a rainwater catchment system, energy efficient luminaires, and a ground source
heat pump to heat and cool the building, the station is extremely impressive at first glance. The
design team collaborated to offer natural gardens, an open shelter, daylight, and parking for
transit users. The most prominent features on the site are the three bioswales, which all offer
attractive scenery both around and within the outside sheltered waiting area. A new and innova-
tive development in downtown Springfield, on of the goals of the project was to help revitalize
the center of the city.
Our goal is to test the theories and claims of the designers. Our society has popularized the
term ‘green design,’ but are there any studies done to see if these ‘green’ systems are working
to do what we are expecting to do?
Focusing mainly on vegetation and the stormwater management system, we want to study just
how effective and beneficial the bioswale remediation of water quality is. We also will compare
the effectiveness of the system to the initial goals and intents of the design team. By first inves-
tigating and learning how the stormwater management system works, we will then examine the
factors that determine the success or failure of the system.
DESIGN TEAM:
WBGS Architecture and Planning, PC - Principal Design Team
Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc. - Civil and Traffic Engineers
Cameron McCarthy Gilbert and Shiebe - Landscape Architects
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
8
A
2
3
1
A
B
3
2
1
C
D
E
F
G
H
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
3
2
1
E
F
G
H
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
W
X
X
BE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
A
C
F
D
11
1
11
1
1
1 11
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3
3
3 33
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
222
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
22 2
2
3
33 3
3
33
3
3
33
3 33
33
33
2
2
2
22 2
2
3
3
33
33
3
3
3 33
33
33
3
3
2
2 22
22
3
3
3
3
33
33
3
33
3
33
2
22
3
3
3
3
2
PP
LL
LLL
LL
LL LLLLLLLLL
L
LL
L
LLLL
PI
I
RR
R
RR
RR
RR
= = == = == = == = == = == = =
= = == = == = == = == = == = =
LL
L
P PP
F
LL
LL
LL
L
L L L L
LL
I
I
R
R
R
CC
C
CC
CC
CC
CC
CCC
CC
CC
CC
CC
CCC
CCC
CC
CC
CC
C CC
C
LLL
L
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
L
C
O
R
O
L LL
RR
C CC
C
O
RR
R
F F FFF
L
L OO
L
6 Pe
n or
i(a
t 24"
o.c
.)
8 Co
r ser
K
(at 2
4" o
.c.)
9 Ile
cre
H
(at 2
4" o
.c.)
38 P
ol m
un
2 O
em c
er80
Mah
rep
38 S
ym a
lb 3
Oem
cer
9 M
ah n
er
15 M
ah n
er
4 O
em c
er
63 M
ah n
er
62 V
ib ti
n S
15 P
ru la
u M
9 C
or s
er K
23 P
ru la
u M
21 C
or s
er K
18 P
ol m
un
8 P
ru la
u M
14 P
ru la
u M
15 C
or s
er K
12 C
or s
er K
52 It
e vir
H
12 P
ru la
u M
11 C
or s
er K
22 P
ru la
u M
12 C
or s
er K
26 It
e vir
H
38 P
ru la
u M
9 C
or s
er K
14 P
ol m
un23
0 M
ah re
p
5
Rib
san
2 O
em c
er
12 P
en o
ri
18 P
ru la
u M
12 H
em h
yb26
Gen
pil V
15 L
on p
il
14 L
on p
il
30 H
em h
yb
36 G
en p
il V
10 P
ru la
u M
5 P
an v
ir H
10 B
er c
or
4 Iri
sib
1 Fo
t maj
M3
Pru
lau
M
10 F
ot g
ar
12 P
en o
ri
28 F
ot g
ar
10 P
er a
tr
18 P
ru la
u M
18 R
ud fu
l G
14 P
en o
ri
20 P
ru la
u M
10 F
ot g
ar4
Gen
pil V
3 Ca
m s
as Y
22 V
ib o
pu N
56 M
ah re
p
12 P
en o
ri
28 F
ot g
ar
10 P
er a
tr
18 P
ru la
u M
18 R
ud fu
l G
28 P
ru la
u M
20 M
ah re
p
13 P
ru la
u M
24 H
ak m
ac A
13 L
on p
il
7 P
ol m
un15
Cor
ser
K
PLAT
FORM
GAR
DEN
9 Pr
u la
u M
Fill a
reas
bet
ween
conc
rete
pav
er a
nd w
alk
with
18
Sag
sub.
6 R
ib s
an
See
1L1
062
L106
6 Vi
b tin
S
PRE-
CAST
PLA
NTER
S 6
Cam
sas
Y
18 L
ir m
us S
12 H
ed h
el N
1
Rib
san
2 Sy
m a
lb
6
3
Am
e al
n 1
5 Co
r ser
F
43
Cor s
er I
325
Cor s
er K
55
Cor v
er M
5
Ech
pur
D
5
Fot
maj
M
9
Hyd
que
52
Lon
pil
137
Mah
ner
4
Mol
aru
W
18
Myr
cal
3
Oem
cer
15
Pen
alo
1
Phi
lew
3
Phy
cap
168
Pol m
un
3
Ros
rug
6
Rib
san
45
Rud
ful G
12
0 Sa
l luc
las
5550
Sed
ges/
Rush
es
64
Spi d
ou
140
Sym
alb
C
F
L O R
SOUT
HWES
T O
PEN
SPAC
E At b
otto
m o
f slo
pe a
long
Millr
ace
edge
adj
ust
proc
edur
es a
nd c
onst
ruct
ion
tech
niqu
es to
in
corp
orat
e be
st m
anag
emen
t pra
ctice
s wh
ich m
eet
or e
xcee
d al
l ero
sion
cont
rol r
equi
rem
ents
whi
le
com
plet
ing
work
to th
e or
dina
ry h
igh
wate
r lin
e.
ORDINARY HIGH
WATER ELEVATIO
N
ORDINARY HIGH
WATER ELEVATIO
NORDINARY HIG
H
WATER ELEVATIO
N
TOP
OF
BANK
EDG
E O
F W
ATER
Lo
cate
d fro
m in
form
atio
n on
site
sur
vey
11/2
4/02
.
OHW449.6
�
OHW449.6
�
OHW449.7
�
At b
otto
m o
f slo
pe a
long
Millr
ace
edge
adj
ust
proc
edur
es a
nd c
onst
ruct
ion
tech
niqu
es to
in
corp
orat
e be
st m
anag
emen
t pra
ctice
s wh
ich m
eet
or e
xcee
d al
l ero
sion
cont
rol r
equi
rem
ents
whi
le
com
plet
ing
work
to th
e O
rdin
ary
High
Wat
er lin
e.
ORDINARY HIGH
WATER ELEVATIO
N
ORDINARY HIGH
WATER ELEVATIO
NORDINARY HIG
H
WATER ELEVATIO
N
25' R
IPAR
IAN
SETB
ACK
50' R
IPAR
IAN
SETB
ACK
TOP
OF
BANK
EDG
E O
F W
ATER
Lo
cate
d fro
m in
form
atio
n on
site
sur
vey
11/2
4/02
.
OHW449.6
�
OHW449.6
�
OHW449.7
�
CCHEC
KED:
DATE
:
DRAW
N:
PLO
T SC
ALE:
FILE
NO
:
PRO
JECT
NO
:
1" =
20'
120
00 W
BGS
ARCH
ITEC
TURE
& P
LANN
ING
, PC
OF
WBG
S
BDM
0'20
'40
'10
'
3/31
/03
RBC
PLAN
TING
PLA
N
L103
L103
PLAN
TING
PLA
N
SPRI
NGFI
ELD
STAT
ION
SPRI
NGFI
ELD,
ORE
GO
N
LEG
END
Plan
t Bed
See
spec
ificat
ions
for t
opso
il pla
cem
ent.
Lawn
Se
e sp
ecific
atio
ns fo
r top
soil p
lace
men
t.
Shru
bs, P
eren
ials,
Gro
und
Cove
rs,
Gra
sses
, Sed
ges
and
Rush
es
Prop
erty
Lin
e
Tree
Do n
ot in
stal
l any
pla
nt m
ater
ials
until
Land
scap
e Ar
chite
ct
has
revie
wed
and
appr
oved
irrig
atio
n sy
stem
inst
alla
tion,
are
a co
vera
ge b
alan
cing,
soi
l pre
para
tion
and
finish
gra
ding
. Re
fine
the
shap
e an
d fin
ish g
rade
of p
lant
bed
s an
d la
wn
area
s as
dire
cted
by
Land
scap
e Ar
chite
ct.
Verif
y ex
act l
ocat
ions
and
rout
ing
of e
xistin
g un
der-
grou
nd u
tilitie
s pr
ior t
o st
artin
g ex
cava
tion.
Rep
air
any
dam
age
to e
xistin
g pi
pes,
utili
ties,
or r
elat
ed
facil
ities
at C
ontra
ctor
's ex
pens
e in
a m
anne
r ap
prov
ed b
y La
ndsc
ape
Arch
itect
. Ba
rrica
de a
nd p
rote
ct tr
unks
, lim
bs, r
oots
and
root
zon
es
beyo
nd d
riplin
e of
exis
ting
trees
and
pla
nt m
ater
ials
to re
mai
n as
dire
cted
by
Land
scap
e Ar
chite
ct.
Cut n
o lim
bs o
r roo
ts
larg
er th
an 2
.5" i
n di
amet
er w
ithou
t app
rova
l of L
ands
cape
Ar
chite
ct.
Fini
sh g
rade
is to
p of
tops
oil.
Mul
ch is
in a
dditio
n.
Prun
e al
l new
pla
nt m
ater
ials
as d
irect
ed b
y La
ndsc
ape
Arch
itect
. Tr
ees,
shru
bs, a
nd g
roun
dcov
ers
plan
ted
too
deep
ly wi
ll not
be
acce
pted
. Se
e ty
pica
l tre
e pl
antin
g de
tails
. Pl
ant q
uant
ities
show
n ar
e fo
r con
tract
or's
conv
enie
nce
only.
Co
ntra
ctor
is re
spon
sible
to p
rovid
e 10
0% c
over
age
of e
ntire
ar
ea a
t spa
cing
show
n
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.NOTE
S
3L1
05
Pole
Mou
nted
Lig
ht
See
Elec
trica
l Dra
wing
s.
ALTE
RNAT
ES
6
on p
lan)
PLAN
T LI
STQ
ty.
Key
Bota
nica
l Nam
eCo
mm
on N
ame
Size
Cond
ition
Spac
ing
(unl
ess
show
n ot
herw
ise
Com
men
ts (a
lso
see
spec
ifica
tions
)
Shru
bs, G
roun
d Co
vers
and
Per
enni
als
3Am
e al
nAm
elan
chie
r aln
ifolia
Serv
icebe
rry5
gal
cont
aine
ras
sho
wnFu
ll, ev
enly
bran
ched
10Be
r cor
Berg
enia
cor
difo
liaHe
artle
af B
erge
nia
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
as s
hown
Full a
nd b
ushy
9Ca
m s
as Y
Cam
ellia
sas
anqu
a 'Y
ulet
ide'
Sasa
nqua
Cam
ellia
5 ga
lco
ntai
ner
as s
hown
Full a
nd b
ushy
55Co
r ver
MCo
reop
sis v
ertic
illata
'Moo
nbea
m'
Thre
adle
af C
oreo
psis
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
18" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
15Co
r ser
FCo
rnus
ser
icea
'Fla
viram
ea'
Yello
wtwi
g Do
gwoo
d5
gal
cont
aine
r5'
o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy43
Cor s
er I
Corn
us s
erice
a 'Is
anti'
Isan
ti Re
dtwi
g Do
gwoo
d5
gal
cont
aine
r5'
o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy44
2Co
r ser
KCo
rnus
ser
icea
'Kel
seyi'
Kelse
y Do
gwoo
d3
gal
cont
aine
r30
" o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy5
Ech
pur D
Echi
nace
a pu
rpur
ea (d
warf)
Dwar
f Pur
ple
Cone
flowe
r1
gal
cont
aine
r24
" o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy76
Fot g
arFo
ther
gilla
gar
deni
iDw
arf F
othe
rgilla
3 ga
lco
ntai
ner
24" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
6Fo
t maj
MFo
ther
gilla
maj
or 'M
t. Ai
ry'
Mt.
Airy
Fot
herg
illa5
gal
cont
aine
ras
sho
wnFu
ll and
bus
hy66
Gen
pil V
Gen
ista
pilo
sa 'V
anco
uver
Gol
d'Si
lkyle
af W
oadw
axen
3 ga
lco
ntai
ner
30" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
24Ha
k m
ac A
Hako
nech
loa
mac
ra 'A
lbo
Stria
ta'
Varie
gate
d Ha
kone
Gra
ss4"
pot
cont
aine
r12
" o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy12
Hed
hel N
Hede
ra h
elix
'Nee
dle
Poin
t'En
glish
Ivy
4" p
otco
ntai
ner
as s
hown
Full a
nd b
ushy
42He
m h
ybHe
mer
ocal
lis h
ybrid
Dayli
ly1
gal
cont
aine
r24
" o.c
.Ch
oose
var
iety
that
reac
hes
3' h
t; ye
llow.
9Hy
d qu
eHy
dran
gea
quer
cifol
iaO
akle
af H
ydra
ngea
5 ga
lco
ntai
ner
4' o
.c.
Full,
even
ly br
anch
ed9
Ile c
re H
Ilex
cren
ata
'Hel
leri'
Helle
ri Ja
pane
se H
olly
3 ga
lco
ntai
ner
18" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
75Ite
vir
HIte
a vir
gini
ca 'H
enry
's G
arne
t'Vi
rgin
ia S
weet
spire
5 ga
lco
ntai
ner
3' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
4Iri
sib
Iris
sibiri
caSi
beria
n Iri
s1
gal
cont
aine
r4'
o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy18
Lir m
us S
Lirio
pe m
usca
ri 'S
ilver
y Su
npro
of'
Lily
Turf
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
as s
hown
Full a
nd b
ushy
94Lo
n pi
lLo
nice
ra p
ileat
aHo
neys
uckle
Priv
et3
gal
cont
aine
r4'
o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy22
4M
ah n
erM
ahon
ia n
ervo
saLo
ngle
af M
ahon
ia3
gal
cont
aine
r24
" o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy38
6M
ah re
pM
ahon
ia re
pens
Cree
ping
Mah
onia
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
18" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
4M
ol a
ru W
Mol
inia
aru
ndin
acea
'Win
dspi
el'
Tall P
urpl
e M
oor G
rass
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
3' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
. Al
tern
ate
cultiv
ar: '
Karl
Foer
ster
'18
Myr
cal
Myr
ica c
alifo
rnica
Pacifi
c W
ax M
yrtle
5 ga
lco
ntai
ner
5' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
14O
em c
erO
emle
ria c
eras
iform
isIn
dian
Plu
m5
gal
cont
aine
ras
sho
wnFu
ll, ev
enly
bran
ched
5Pa
n vir
HPa
nicu
m v
irgat
um 'H
anse
Her
ms'
Red
Switc
h G
rass
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
as s
hown
Full a
nd b
ushy
15Pe
n al
oPe
nnise
tum
alo
pecu
roid
esFo
unta
in G
rass
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
3' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
56Pe
n or
iPe
nnise
tum
orie
ntal
eFo
unta
in G
rass
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
24" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
20Pe
r atr
Pero
vskia
atri
plici
folia
Russ
ian
Sage
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
30" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
1Ph
i lew
Phila
delp
hus
lewi
siiM
ock
Ora
nge
5 ga
lco
ntai
ner
as s
hown
Full,
even
ly br
anch
ed3
Phy
cap
Phys
ocar
pus
capi
tatu
sPa
cific
Nine
bark
5 ga
lco
ntai
ner
6' o
.c.
Full,
even
ly br
anch
ed24
5Po
l mun
Polys
tichu
m m
unitu
mSw
ordf
ern
1 ga
lco
ntai
ner
4' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
268
Pru
lau
MPr
unus
laur
ocer
asus
'Mt.
Vern
on'
Mt.
Vern
on L
aure
l1
gal
cont
aine
r24
" o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy18
Rib
san
Ribe
s sa
ngui
neum
Red
Curra
nt5
gal
cont
aine
r5'
o.c
.Fu
ll, ev
enly
bran
ched
3Ro
s ru
gRo
sa ru
gosa
Rom
anas
Ros
e3
gal
cont
aine
ras
sho
wnFu
ll, ev
enly
bran
ched
81Ru
d fu
l GRu
dbec
kia fu
lgid
a 'G
olds
turm
'Bl
ack-
Eyed
Sus
an1
gal
cont
aine
r18
" o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy12
0Sa
l luc
las
Salix
lucid
a la
siand
raPa
cific
Willo
w1
gal
cont
aine
r3'
o.c
.64
Spi d
ouSp
iraea
dou
glas
iiDo
ugla
s Sp
iraea
3 ga
lco
ntai
ner
4' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
180
Sym
alb
Sym
phor
icarp
os a
lbus
Snow
berry
3 ga
lco
ntai
ner
4' o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
22Vi
b op
u N
Vibu
rnum
opu
lus
'Nan
um'
Dwar
f Eur
opea
n Cr
anbe
rry B
ush
3 ga
lco
ntai
ner
30" o
.c.
Full a
nd b
ushy
68Vi
b tin
SVi
burn
um ti
nus
'Spr
ing
Bouq
uet'
Laur
ustin
us5
gal
cont
aine
r3'
o.c
.Fu
ll and
bus
hy
Sedg
es a
nd R
ushe
s 18
50Ca
r obn
Care
x ob
nupt
aSl
ough
Sed
ge8"
o.c
.18
50Ju
n ef
fJu
ncus
effu
sus
Soft
Rush
8" o
.c.
1850
Sci m
icSc
irpus
micr
ocar
pus
Smal
l Fru
ited
Bulru
sh8"
o.c
.5
cu. i
n., 7
2-ce
ll plu
gsEv
enly
mix
in d
esig
nate
d ar
eas
ADDI
TIVE
: ADD
PRE
CAST
PLA
NTER
S AN
D TH
E FO
LLO
WIN
G IT
EMS
WIT
HIN
THE
PLAN
TER:
IRRI
GAT
ION
RISE
R, C
OUP
LER,
BUB
BLER
HEA
D, P
EA
GRA
VEL,
FIL
TER
FABR
IC, S
MAL
L RI
VER
ROCK
, SO
IL M
IX, M
ULCH
AND
PL
ANTS
. PRO
VIDE
BLO
CKO
UT IN
CO
NCRE
TE S
IDEW
ALK
FOR
IRRI
GAT
ION
AND
DRAI
NAG
E. D
ELET
E BR
ASS
UTIL
ITY
MAR
KERS
AT
THES
E LO
CATI
ONS
.
SP
RIN
GFI
ELD
STA
TIO
N P
LAN
TIN
G A
ND
LAY
OU
T P
LAN
, pro
vided
by
Bra
in M
cCar
thy,
LA
.
Ther
e ar
e th
ree
bio
swal
es o
n t
he
Spri
ngf
ield
Sta
tion
Sit
e:1.
Maj
or b
iosw
ale
that
tre
ats
stor
mw
ater
runof
f fr
om b
us
dep
ot,
the
build
ings
on s
ite,
and t
he
par
king
lot.
(Th
e on
e th
at w
e ar
e st
udyi
ng.
)
2.
Min
or b
iosw
ale,
nam
ed t
he
Pla
tfor
m G
arden
, w
hic
h t
reat
s th
e bar
ely
pol
lute
d r
unof
f fr
om t
he
roof
of
the
outs
ide
shel
ter
stru
cture
and m
ainly
ser
ves
an a
esth
etic
val
ue.
3.
Maj
or b
iosw
ale,
tre
ats
stor
mw
ater
runof
f fr
om t
he
far
corn
er o
f th
e par
king
lot.
1
2
3
N
9
QUESTIONSOn our first walk through of the Springfield Station complex, we developed a list of questions
mainly concentrating on the bioswales on site. We later used these questions to help us develop
our hypotheses and narrow our case study parameters.
1. What is the maximum hourly rainfall for the location of Springfield, Oregon?
2. What kinds of plants are selected for the bioswale?
3. What is the effect of littering on a bioswale and rainwater catchment system?
4. What is the significance of the various sized rocks and pebbles?
5. What type of maintenance is required for a bioswale, and who performs the maintenance?
6. What is the purpose of the culverts located within the bioswale?
7. What vegetation and materials are used in the bioswales, and what implications do these
materials have on the stormwater management system?
8. Since the bus station is located in such an urban space, what are the implications on the
stormwater management system because of all the through traffic from cars, buses, and the
trains that run by the station?
9. Why does the bed look dry after there was a heavy rainfall last night?
10. Does the bioswale landscaping continue on to the other areas of the station (where the
bike storage is located and toward the edges of the site)?
11. How is the structure of the bus station shelter integrated with the design of the bioswale
system?
12. What are the materials used between the bioswale and how do they affect the system?
13. Did the designers plan for natural growth of the vegetation within the bioswale? If so, how
did they accommodate growth within the design?
14. What are the initial goals and concepts for this project? Did the designers meet these
goals?
15. Does it work in conjunction with the stream already there? Or does the bioswale function
as its own entity?
16. Hoe many pollutants are in the creek, and how does it affect the landscape or bioswale?
17. What are the effects of the water once it reaches the creek, after it has been through the
entire bioswale system?
18. Are they using plants to naturally filter the water?
19. What level of control is exercised on pollutants affecting the bioswale system?
20. Is the creek man-made or natural?
21. How do they control the runoff from the parking lot into the bioswale system?
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
10The good news is most, if not all, of our questions were answered by the end of our case
study.
HYPOTHESES1. The primary bioswale reduces the volume of stormwater runoff from the site.
2. The primary bioswale improves the water quality of the runoff from the site.
Plan of the primary bioswale from WGBS.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
N
11
METHODOLOGYIn preparation for our study, we began by contacting the principal landscape architects of the
Springfield Station, Brian McCarthy and Sandy Dymale. They provided us with essential infor-
mation, which helped us proceed with the case study. We learned how the bioswale systems
work and the design intents the landscape architects had for the Springfield Station site. After
the background design information about the system was obtained, we had to begin devising a
way to capture the water from the culverts and a way to have the water quality tested. Numerous
phone calls were then made, to try to gain permission to access the bioswale for testing and also
to have a laboratory test the water quality for us, hopefully free of charge. This turned out to be
very difficult, and after getting brushed off and having difficulty making contact with the right
people, we finally got in touch with Chuck Gottfried, who is charge of stormwater management
for the City of Springfield. He helped us get in contact with Analytical Testing Laboratories, in
Eugene, Oregon. Through them, we received a cost estimate for each test and what information
the tests’ would provide. When gaining permission from Charlie Simmons, the facilities manager
of Springfield Station, he offered to support most of the testing costs, and the director of the
laboratory covered the remaining cost.
We began the water quality testing by trying to capture water flowing through the system. Usu-
ally not a factor in Spring in Eugene, Oregon, but there was no rain. It finally rained on May 7th,
2006 with 0.16” of precipitation. There was morning dew present on the concrete, but there was
no water coming from the bioswale system.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
Since no water was
present, we had to wait
for a larger rainfall, so
we could get the amount
of water needed to take
samples. On May 19,
2006, enough precipi-
tation occurred on the
site for us to gather
water from two points
within the bioswale, one
before the water enters
the bioswale system
and another after it has
filtered through.
Pictures of the bioswale.
Bioswale and collection locations from WGBS. (To the Right)
N
In the first spot, catching the water was easy because of a large puddle piling up before water
entered the bioswale. We scooped the water into a sample jar and poured it into the various
sized bottles required to test the water.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
The second sample gathering did not go as smoothly as the first. We devised a way in which
we channel the water leaving the culvert through a chain of rocks onto a leaf, where the water
could then slowly drop into the sample jar. Each sample jar took about 20 minutes to fill. Unfor-
tunately, there were many issues with this. First, the leaf could have contaminated the samples.
Secondly, the culvert is in the open and throughout the water collection process, it was rained
upon. The rain water could have dramatically affected the sample readings through dilution.
Furthermore, there was a large amount of litter in the area, including inside the culvert (see
pictures below), which could contaminate the samples.
After gathering all the samples, we tried to put all the water containers in the refrigerator as
soon as possible. Although some did not immediately enter, all were temporarily stored in a cold
environment until it was possible to transport them to a refrigerator. We took the samples on a
Friday night, meaning we had to wait two days until it was possible for us to return the samples
to Analytical Testing Laboratories. Unknowingly, some of the bottles in the refrigerator ended up
frozen, causing a bottle to break, and causing us to throw out some samples.
Through many challenging events, we were still able to collect samples for the testing of: gaso-
line, diesel, heavy metals, total suspended solids, pH, lead, cadmium, and chrome both before
and after water entered the bioswale system.
The puddle after being used to gather the water samples. The catchment system imple-mented to get the water runoff from the culvert.
Litter found around and in-side the end culvert.(There were larger amounts far in the pipe system that we were not able to photograph.)
13
DATA ANALYSISThrough our sample collections and observations, we were able to determine that both of our
hypotheses are correct. The primary bioswale at the Springfield Station reduces the amount of
stormwater runoff and improves the water quality of the stormwater runoff from the site.
Although we have no hard numbers of the total amount of water entering and leaving the site
before and after rain events, we can still deduce from visual observations that the stormwater
runoff is reduced. On May 7th, 2006, there was 0.16” of precipitation, according to Weather
Underground. When observing the bioswale the next morning, there was no water coming out of
the system, just a possible morning dew lightly covering the concrete. Comparatively, after the
rainfall on May 19, 2006, which a more concentrated and heavy rainfall (0.2” of precipitation),
there was water visibility exiting the system well into the night and next day.
Furthermore, when turning our samples into Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc., one of
our glass bottles that was to test for petroleum contamination broke due to ice formation while
in the refrigerator. Two of the other samples that were in plastic bottles also had frozen chunks
of ice inside, possibly affecting the accuracy of our water quality test results. Please note that
all three bottles that contained ice were our samples of the water after it passed through the
bioswale. There was no ice in the water samples containing the water before it entered the bio-
swale, even though the samples contained more H2O and less pollutants within the bottles. The
water runoff from the concrete, in the first samples, would have more contaminants that would
keep the water from freezing, although they were introduced to the same conditions. Through
deducting what happened to the second batch of samples, we can intuitively say the bioswale
will reduce the amount of pollutants, thus improving the water quality in the stormwater.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
View of the culvert on May 8, 2006 after a light rain.
View of culvert after a longer rainfall on April 28, 2006. Type of lab bottle that broke under freezing conditions.
Following our direct on-site observations, our data analysis also includes our results from the
water quality testing done by Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc., in conjunction with
Neilson Research Corporation. As testing parameters, we chose to include a range of seven ma-
jor contaminants in stormwater runoff from the categories of suspended solids, heavy metals,
and petroleum pollutants, all of which would likely be found on the Springfield Station site. We
conducted seven tests to see contaminant levels of:
1. Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
2. Lead (Pb)
3. Cadmium (Cd)
4. Chromium (Cr)
5. Diesel Pollution
6. Lube Oil Pollution
7. Gasoline Pollution
We also chose to do a pH test to see if the water is acidic, neutral, or alkaline.
Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc., and Neilson Research Corporation did all testing
according to EPA standard testing methods, which is denoted in both the chart below and in the
appendix. All tests were recorded in units of parts per million (ppm), also known as milligrams
per liter (mg/L).
*ND - Not detected at the Minimum Reporting Limit.
All analysis reports and results are provided by Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc., in
conjunction with Neilson Research Corporation, who performed the petroleum tests.
All results are in the form of comparative charts in the following pages, but the petroleum pol-
lutant gasoline was below the reporting limits of the test performed. As a result, there was no
detection of gasoline in either of the water samples, both before entering the bioswale, and
after going through the bioswale
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
ANALYSIS (TEST) TESTING METHOD "BEFORE" RESULTS "AFTER" RESULTSpH EPA 150.1 7 7.2Total Suspended Solids EPA 160.2 436 mg/L 58 mg/LLead EPA 239.2 0.0599 mg/L 0.0077 mg/LCadium EPA 213.2 0.0011 mg/L 0.0002 mg/LChromium EPA 218.2 0.0344 mg/L 0.0048 mg/LDiesel Range (C12-24) NWTPH-DX 0.493 mg/L 0.588 mg/LLube Range (C24-C40) NWTPH-DX 4.85 mg/L 1.45 mg/LTPH as Gasoline NWTPH-GX ND* ND*
15
pH LEVELS IN STORMWATER RUNOFF
Based on the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Oregon’s Department of Environmen-
tal Quality (DEQ) standards, a pH value of 7 denotes a neutral solution, while a value below 7
indicates an acidic solution and a value above 7 indicates an alkaline solution. The pH tests
concluded that both water samples, before and after entering the bioswale, were relatively neu-
tral. According to Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc., a pH of 7 is a good indication of
relatively pure water. Since both resultants are measured in parts per million (ppm), a 0.2 differ-
ence shows that they are comparatively the same. This difference can be accounted by variables
explained in the methodology, like rain water dilution of the water samples after going through
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
6.9 6.95 7 7.05 7.1 7.15 7.2 7.25
"BEFORE" RESULTS
"AFTER" RESULTS
pH
pH Levels in Stormwater Runoff the bioswale. For maximum ac-
curacy, pH should be analyzed
as soon as possible after col-
lecting the samples. Unfortu-
nately, we were unable to per-
form the tests until 3 days after
the samples were originally
collected from Springfield Sta-
tion, so this could also account
for the slight differentiation be-
tween the two results.
TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS CONTAMINATION LEVELS IN STORMWATER
58/436 = x/100
x = 13.3%
100% - 13.3% = 86.7%
According to Oregon’s Department of Environmental Quality
(DEQ), Total Suspended Solids (TSS) are particulate matter
that is suspended in water and is not able to be removed by
a filter. A large amount was removed from the water by being
trapped in the bioswale grasses. Looking at the Total Suspend-
ed Solids (TSS) as a percent of removal, we categorized the
“before” result of 436 ppm as being equal to 100%. Based on
this assumption, there was 86.7% of TSS removed from the
water after traveling through the bioswale, with a remaining
13.3% of TSS still present in the water after traveling through
the bioswale. 16
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION LEVELS IN STORMWATER RUNOFF
Based on our results, the removal of heavy metals was at an order of a magnitude. All three
heavy metals, Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), and Chromium (Cr), were significantly reduced based
on their initial levels in the water before traveling through the bioswale.
Based on an interview with Michele Hanson, an environmental biologist for the U.S. Army Corps.
of Engineers, the removal of the heavy metals is associated with the removal of the Total Sus-
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045 0.05 0.055 0.06
"BEFORE" RESULTS
"AFTER" RESULTS
"BEFORE" RESULTS "AFTER" RESULTS Chromium 0.0344 0.0048
Cadium 0.0011 0.0002
Lead 0.0599 0.0077
Heavy Metal Contamina/on Levels in Stormwater Runoff in ppm (mg/L)
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
"BEFORE" RESULTS
"AFTER" RESULTS
"BEFORE" RESULTS "AFTER" RESULTS TSS 436 58
Total Suspended Solids Contamina1on Levels in Stormwater
in ppm (mg/L)
17
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
"BEFORE" RESULTS
"AFTER" RESULTS
"BEFORE" RESULTS "AFTER" RESULTS Lube Range (C24-‐C40) 4.85 1.45
Diesel Range (C12-‐24) 0.493 0.588
Petroleum Contamina.on Levels in Stormwater Runoff in ppm (mg/L)
pended Solids (TSS) because they absorb to the TSS. Lead, Cadium, and Chromium are all
inorganic compounds which can be found in stormwater runoff mainly from automotive residue.
PETROLEUM CONTAMINATION LEVELS IN STORMWATER RUNOFF
After receiving our analysis results for the petroleum pollution testing, we found that there were
detectable levels of both diesel and lube oil but no detection of gasoline.
Base on our graph and results, there was 0.493 ppm of diesel-based contaminants detected
in the sample of water before going through the bioswale and 0.588 ppm of diesel-based con-
taminants detected in the water sample after traveling through the bioswale. While this would
seem to be odd after talking to Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc., we learned that it
was miniscule difference and that these two figures could be considered the same. This means
that while the bioswale is reducing the lube oil pollution significantly, it is not effecting the level
of diesel pollution in the stormwater runoff. This came as a surprise to us and would require
further investigation to determine why diesel pollution is not being reduced. This issue is of
great importance because the LTD buses that run through Springfield Station are diesel fueled,
based on information gained from Charlier Simmons, Springfield Station LTD Facilities Manager.
18
CONCLUSIONSAlthough a hard and complicated process, we were able to prove that both of our hypotheses are
correct. The bioswale at the Springfield Station reduces the amount of stormwater runoff and
improves water quality. We were able to deduce this through the large amount of observations
made while visiting the site under a multitude of weather conditions and water quality testing.
Bioswales are a natural way for designers to reduce the amount of pollutants that enter our
water systems and help control flooding during wet seasons. The vegetation within bioswales
filter out contaminants that would normally enter directly into our streams and rivers. Through
bioswales, designers can reduce the loads of water that will need to be cleaned in Waste Water
Management Plants, thus reducing future water costs. Furthermore, by reducing the amount of
water entering our streams and rivers, we are able to help control flooding during heavy rain-
falls. This is possible because vegetation reduces the amount of water leaving a site and slows
down the flow causing a longer lag before the water enters the system.
Quantity and quality are the two main purposes of stormwater management. These have both
been achieved by the main bioswale at the Springfield Station. This is a good example of how
man can mimic the natural processes in the built environment, reducing the negative environ-
mental impacts that urban areas can have.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
Springfield Station outflow into the Springfield Millrace. Picture of a typical outflow of stormwa-ter from a site in British Columbia.(http://www.fraserroverkeeper.ca/Quickstart/Im-ageLib/pipe_pollution_from.jpg19
DESIGN LESSONS LEARNEDIn our study of the bioswale system at Springfield Station, we discovered some design flaws that
could potentially detract from the beneficial qualities that a bioswale could provide.
We repeatedly saw alarming amounts of litter around and inside the last culvert of the bioswale
on site. This litter can re-pollute the water that just went through the system, reversing the filtra-
tion and remediation process that the water just went through. Regular maintenance needs to
be made to the system, to clean the litter that can easily collect there because of the amount
of water that runs through the bioswale, consideration needs to be made that flooding occurs
and water can back up into the system. This is what happened this past winter season. The
Springfield Millrace backed up and litter that was in the millrace ended up deep within the exit
culvert. To prevent this from happening, the culvert needs to be placed on a higher elevation.
This is beneficial for two reasons: it creates a longer rock bed for the excess stormwater runoff
to filter through and a higher flood water level before it reaches the culvert.
Overall, a bioswale can help with stormwater problems. If maintained and well planned is done
by the designers, a bioswale should be able to help reduce the amount of stormwater runoff and
pollutants that enter our streams and rivers. If more designers employ bioswales on their sites,
a large impact will be made on our stormwater systems.
If time permitted, we would further compare our results to Oregon’s Department of Environ-
mental Quality Stormwater Standards and the Total Daily Maximum Load (TDML) and contami-
nant levels. We would also like to further explore why the diesel level of contamination remained
unchanged.
A final design lesson learned is that strong lines of communication need to be formed between
designer, client, and policy makers to have a successful project. This discontinuance of design-
ers’ responsibility for a project should not stop when the project is completed, but should be
present throughout the life of the design.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
20
REFERENCES1. Analytical Laboratory and Consultants, Inc. in conjunction with Nielson Research Corpora-
tion provided us with all of the analysis reports for water quality testing, and explained what
the results meant.
2. Begin, Lisa, Stormwater Authority, accessed as a resource tool throughout April and May
2006: http://www.stormwaterauthority.org/glossary.aspx.
3. Cohen, Joshua and Angela Matt, Case Study on ‘Harvesting Rainwater’: http://www.uoregon.
edu/~hof/S01harvestingrain/intro.html.
4. Department of Environmental Quality. Laboratory Analytic Methods. Accessed as a resource
tool on June 14, 2006: http://www.deq.state.or.us/lab/methods/methods.htm.
5. Fraser Riverkeeper, Vancouver, British Columbia, accessed for comparison on May 31, 2006:
http://www.fraserriverkeeper.ca/Quickstart/ImageLib/pipe_pollution_from.jpg.
6. Gottfried, Chuck. Interview regarding stormwater management and bioswale operation, May
18, 2006. (He also got us in contact with Analytical Testing Laboratories to help with testing
our samples.)
7. Hanson, Michele. Environmental Biologist with the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers. Interview
regarding water quality testing results and general stormwater management information.
May 20, 2006 and June 9, 2006.
8. McCarthy, Brian D., Principal Landscape Architect. Interview regarding the design and sys-
tem of bioswales in the Springfield Stations’ Landscaping, April 10, 2006. (All plans of
Springfield Station provided by Brian McCarthy and Sandy Dymale.)
9. Pivot Architecture (WGBS Architecture and Planning), accessed April 6, 2006: http://www.
pivotarchitecture.com/portfolio/transit/springfield_station_info.html
10. Simmons, Charlie, LTD Facilities Manager of Springfield Station, Interview regarding the
bioswales located on site.
11. Stein, Benjamin, John S. Reynolds, Walter Grondzik, Alison Kwok, Mechanical and Elec-
trical Equipment for Buildings, 10th ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New Jersey, Hoboken,
2006.
12. SKS-Science, accessed for picture of lab container that broke when ice formed within,
May 31, 2006: http://www.sks-science.com/Glass_Bottes_Amber_SilverCa.jpg.
13. Weather Underground, accessed as a resource tool throughout April and May 2006: http://
www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KEUG/2006/5/31/MonthlyHistory.html#calendar.
Hannah Cooley and Stefanie Young, Arch 497
21