Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ERNN Conference February 28,...
-
Upload
bridget-robinson -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Slide 1 TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy implications ERNN Conference February 28,...
Slide 1
TPEP Implementation: Structures, roles and policy
implicationsERNN ConferenceFebruary 28, 2015
Slide 2
Purposes of Evaluation
• Acknowledge the critical importance of teacher and leadership quality in impacting student growth and support professional learning
• Identify particular areas of strength and opportunities for improvement
• Assist educators needing improvement in making those improvementsWAC 392-191A-050
Slide 3
TPEP 2014-15
• Transition Year 2 of 3 - all new educators and those on probation
- most experienced educators (local decision)» 83% of teachers, 95% of principals have transitioned» 49% teachers on Comprehensive, 34% on Focused
• $5m in teacher training allocated to districts» 80% additional pay for educators to facilitate or
participate in professional learning re TPEP
Slide 4
General Perceptions
• No longer focused on understanding the specifics of the process
• Big paradigm shift: growth/strengths-based• District leaders views differ from those of
principals/teachers• Worthwhile, but not yet smooth
Slide 5
Key Messages
• Be relentless about rater agreement• Relationships and dialogue matter• Commit to building expertise over time• Collective responsibility for success
Slide 6
Challenges
• Evaluators need ongoing training
• Evaluators need time and support to do the work
• Maintain a learning stance – no one knows it all …. yet
Slide 7
Evaluation Data
A B C
Highly Effective
38 5 52
Effective 58 93.7 43
Needs Improvement
4 1.3 4.6
Unsat. 1 0 0.4
If these schools were in your district what questions might you ask?
Slide 8
Building Rater Agreement
• Questions for district and school leaders to consider when examining their own data
• Rater agreement planning tool, videos, workshops, online module
• Practice, practice, practice
Slide 9
What’s required during the cycle?
• Observations • Written notes• Evidence• Conferences • Early-career teachers• Timelines• Forms
Slide 10
In May/June, what about….
• …the summative report? • …Low student growth impact rating on a
Comprehensive?
• …“1” in any SG rubric row?
• Provisional status teacher?
Slide 11
Who is Monitoring?
• First year teacher • Provisional educator with P and D• Provisional educator with B or U• Experienced educator with P or D• Experienced educator with B or U• Educator with Low Student Growth Impact Rating• Experienced educator with B and B• Experienced educator with three previous Focused
Slide 12
Evaluation data and HR
• MUST be a factor in 2015-16• OSPI collected baseline data about 2013-14
uses in SEES• Distinguished Educator recognition required
– Leg policy changes proposed… stay tuned
Slide 13
• Jeanne Harmon• [email protected]• 360-725-6116
Slide 15
Student Growth Consistent
• Required for all teachers and all principals on the revised system
• Teachers focus on whole class; a group of students not reaching full potential; a group of students “in common” with colleagues
• Principals focus on whole-school achievement; students assigned to a subset of teachers; subsets of students selected for closing identifed gaps.
• Multiple measures required – classroom, school, district, state