Sheffield Devolution Deal 24.04.15

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B2SL5WsVUaWmdTFmeVFBWTFIRFU/edit?usp=drive_web

The Sheffield Deal

Mark Whitworth Head of Sustainable City

Sheffield City Council

A residential offer that supports our economic ambitions

“…in order to support 70,000 new jobs over the next ten years we need to provide on average between 7,000 and 10,000 new dwellings per year…” (SCR SEP, March 2014) We need to build more and better homes to support our economic aspirations and support the needs of a growing and changing population Accelerating Housing Growth in the SCR

How do we achieve this

● Co-designed and locally determined programmes

● Removing barriers and freeing-up artificially constrained funding streams

● Funding for infrastructure

● Regulatory changes to maximise impact

The Sheffield City Region Deal

● The SCR Growth Deal - Over £200m for the SCR Investment Fund which will help unlock sites, supporting up to 12,000 new homes

● The SCR Devolution Deal - A Joint Public Assets Board with Government, further commitment from the HCA (‘helping to unlock priority medium- sized housing sites’)

Work in progress

● Securing freedoms, flexibilities and funding from Government will remain an important part of the SCR’s approach ● Developing a strong evidence base which enables housing to be considered as part of the SCR integrated infrastructure plan ● Continuing to explore new and innovative models of investment and delivery

Spatial Priorities Builds on the ‘priority housing areas: spatial overview’ work developed in 2014 (SCR Housing and Regeneration Board)

Key Clusters Relationship with existing infrastructure investment (e.g. SCRIF)

Housing Delivery Investment Plan

● Allows SCC to consider the approaches and interventions which are focused on accelerating housing delivery ● Define our offer to the market ● Providing housing in locations which are well connected to areas of future employment growth ● Creating new and better quality neighbourhoods, and successful centres

Sheffield: A compact city

● Potential for 15,530 units on our land over the next 10 years. ● Important we have a SCR agreement on ‘what homes where?’ and ● SCR focus on a common greenbelt review ● Improving attractiveness of land/development on brownfield sites ● Funding for infrastructure for housing schemes

Where next?

• New financial models – value capture • Support from Government to explore urban

village pilots • A system that allows authorities to borrow

against future CIL at preferential rates and …. • allows authorities to spread infrastructure costs

over a cluster of sites

Where next?

• Incentives that encourage bringing forward brownfield development alongside greenfield development, including:

▫ Long term low interest loans with plot by plot pay back ▫ Tax relief for brownfield development ▫ A programme with recoverable and non- recoverable funds

Rob Warm – Head of Member Relations

Sheffield Housing and Devolution Seminar

Why Cities Matter to Us

• Our members are already there – 215,000 homes

• Housing crisis looks different in different places – devolution fits with that

• Affordability an issue for all core cities

• Wider investment in communities which are struggling

• Major employers and investors in cities

• Civic leadership • Private renting up

82% in a decade in core cities

Political Rationale

• Increased competitiveness • Austerity • Northern Powerhouse brand • English votes for English laws

• Reducing democratic deficit • Tackling north/south divide

• New legal right to demand

devolved powers

How did we get here?

• Don’t mention the R word • 8 July 2004 – no vote in

NE • Cities move into the

space that is left • Challenge remains

governance

Devolution in the North of England

• Long history of collaboration in Manchester model - Combined Authority and elected Mayor accepted

• Scotland (and London) changed terms of the debate

• Disillusionment with London-centric policies • Investment cannot only focus on supply – also

issues of regeneration and renewal; • Manchester model won’t work everywhere – still

real challenge around governance

NHF Working with Core Cities UK

• Raising the profile of housing in the context of devolution

• Showing housing associations as major businesses investing in their communities

• Highlighting the ‘added value’ work of housing associations across health and social care and employment and skills

• Supporting the public sector reform agenda

Housing Associations in Sheffield

• Own, manage and maintain 17,630 • Directly employ around 755 people • Have an estimated turnover of £61.2 million • Investing in 100 affordable homes in

Sheffield supports around 79 jobs in the area and adds around £3.6million to the local economy

What the manifestos say: Labour

• English Devolution Act

• £30bn transferred – including housing, skills and employment

• Retention of business rates

Conservative

• Northern Powerhouse and elected mayors

• Devolve more powers – housing, skills, health, social care

• Growth deals • Business rate

retention

Lib Dems

• Devolve housing and infrastructure (and skills etc)

• Devolve RTB • Devolution on

demand • Rejuvenate local

government

And the SNP…?

• Devolve employment policy

• Extend community asset transfer

• Establish a Scottish Cities Fund – and a Northern Cities Fund

• Push for 100k affordable homes a year in UK

So that means…

• Devolution is not going away

• Housing is part of that • Challenges both us,

and our members • Solutions may

emerge – which we haven’t yet thought of!

HCA Statutory Objectives

• Improve the supply and quality of housing • Secure the regeneration or development of land or

infrastructure • Support in other ways the creation, regeneration or

development of communities for their continued wellbeing

• Contribute to the achievement of sustainable development and good design

A unique partnership creating great places where people chose to live

A growing city region

Manchester Place

• Accelerate the ‘near to market’ pipeline of schemes – undelivered consented schemes • Unlock sites for development • Harness the potential of public funding streams • Public Sector land • Create platforms for investment

Manchester Place

• Utilise market relationships - developers & RSLs and funders to accelerate delivery • Engage proactively with investors • Strategic land assembly and land remediation • Provide neighbourhood plans and development

frameworks • Place-making - creating the right planning

framework • Develop a medium and long term pipeline

• Strategic Planning Powers- to create a statutory spatial framework

• A 10 year £300m Recoverable Housing Investment Fund

GM Devolution agreement

Mayor will receive strategic planning powers • Power to create a statutory spatial framework • Act as the framework for managing planning • Approved by unanimous vote of the Mayor’s

Cabinet • In line with the strategy currently being developed

GM Devolution Agreement £300m Fund to provide a platform for housing growth • Controlled by new Mayor • Recoverable loans or longer term equity • Available over 10 years to private sector partners • Receipts recycled back into fund • GM guaranteeing 80% recovery rate • Aim to support 10-15k new homes

GM Housing Investment Fund

Investment Prospectus – • Support of local authority • Project due diligence satisfactorily completed • Sponsor willing to accept the terms of the loan • Private sector ownership minimum of 51% • Fund managed by GMCA Core Investment Team

GM Housing Investment Fund

• DCLG/HMT Assurance process • Establish governance arrangements June 2015 • Recruit Risk Director and Transaction Managers • Establish Housing Fund Scrutiny Committee • Aim to recycle Fund 2.5 times over 10 years

supporting £1.5b investment

GM Providers and

Devolution

Helen McHale Chief Executive, Stockport Homes Vice-Chair, GM Providers

Background

• Localism, AGMA • Growth and Reform • Influence and Contribution

Organisation • Hearts and Minds • Role and Purpose • Working Together • Constant Evolution – coalition of willing • Collaboration leads to greater

collaboration

Why? • Influence strategic context in which we

are working • Ensure impact for our customers and

business understood • Maximise our contribution • Make working with us easier • Enhance our reputation

Key Issues • Public Sector Reform • Health • Employment • Crime and Social Justice • (Anti-Poverty Strategy)

How • Lead officers • Role and responsibilities • Sub-groups • Understand key contacts in city region

Aims • Integrate our service effectively • No duplication • Get business and funding directly • Use best practice to raise bar generally • Co-design

Conclusion • Decisions and power at a local level and housing

needs to influence it • Aim is to be part of strategic decision making as

well as delivery • Identify key policy issues, what you can offer,

what you need, who will influence and how negotiated

• Local authorities can be complex, hard to penetrate organisations from the outside, a group of them even harder, you have to make it easy to liaise with you

Helen McHale

helen.mchale@stockporthomes.org 0161 474 2865

Devolution An RP Development Perspective

Matthew Harrison Chief Executive Great Places Housing Group

Devolution

Greater Manchester An Ask and an Offer Part of the growth solution

Housing Associations You do social housing for rent, don’t you?

Yes, we do…. and the rest • Shared Ownership

and Equity Products •Outright sale •Market rent

We do… •The Long Term •Place making •Good design •Flexible lettings

We do…

• Big investment • Job creation and skills • Social and economic value • Partnership working and Innovation

The Ask? •Finance •Public land

supply •Risk

The Ask? • Local Leadership • City Region Consistency eg planning • Think about partnerships

The Ask? • Think about brownfield • Think about flexible

approaches • Think about us as

partners • Solution not problem

Devolution of Health in Greater Manchester – the story so far Mike Burrows Managing Director Greater Manchester Academic Health Science Network Sheffield Devolution Seminar 24th April 2015

Devo Manc

• The History & Context • The deal so far….. • The work to be done

CONTEXT – GM DEVOLUTION

CENTRAL VS LOCAL CONTROL – LOCAL REVENUE STREAMS

• Paris 83% • Berlin 75% • New York 66% • England 5%

ASSOCIATION OF GREATER MANCHESTER AUTHORITIES (AGMA) & THE COMBINED AUTHORITY

• Ten Local Authorities

• Joint working since GMCC abolition in 1986 • Combined Authority – 1st April 2011

• Public transport • Skills • Housing • Regeneration • Waste management • Carbon neutrality • Planning permission.

AGMA

• Combined Authority supported by….

• AGMA Wider Leadership Team • Ten Local Authority Chief Executives • Chief Constable • County Fire Officer and Chief Executive • NHS • Other Subject Matter Experts

The Case For GM

• Current gap between public services spend in Greater Manchester & tax generated is £4.7bn pa

• Manchester Independent Economic Review – June 2009

• The Greater Manchester Strategy – August 2009 • Agglomeration Economies Report – 2009

THE CASE FOR AGGLOMERATION ECONOMIES

“Productivity differences are driven by the size of the city region economy, by the availability and quality of factors of production, such as skills and access to transport, as well as the efficiency with which these factors are deployed.” Size matters!

THE GREATER MANCHESTER HEALTH SYSTEM

• Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority 2002-2006 • Association of Greater Manchester PCTs – 2004

• Devolved pan-GM decision making capability • Making It Better – Maternity & Children’s Services

Reformation • Stroke Services • Specialised Cancer services • Stoke services phase 1

• Association of CCGs • Healthier Together

• Devolved governance model in place • Acute services + Primary Care

• Stroke services phase 2 • Devolution – a natural progression

HEALTH DEVOLUTION

• Early priority in MIER • The economic impact of ill health

• Early years • Cost of worklessness • Chaotic Families

• Smoking, obesity, alcohol became economic & productivity issues

THE HEALTH DEVOLUTION TIMELINE

• Whitehall discussions • September 2014 – Chancellor of Exchequer conversation

• Permissive Atmosphere • NHS England initially surprised but then very enthusiastic

• October 2014 - NHS England – Five Year Forward View • 27th Feb 2015 Memorandum of Understanding signed • April 2015 - all decisions about GM taken with GM • April 2015 - shadow governance arrangements • By October, 2015 - initial elements of the Business Case to support

CSR agreed • During 2015 - production of the final agreed GM Health and Social

Care Strategic Clinical & Financial Sustainability Plan • December 2015 - Funds to be devolved and governance sign off • April 2016 - Full devolution of agreed budgets, with the preferred

governance arrangements and underpinning GM and locality S75 arrangements in place.

77

The overriding purpose of the initiative represented in this Memorandum of Understanding is to ensure the greatest and fastest possible improvement to the health and wellbeing of the 2.8 million citizens of Greater Manchester (GM). This requires a more integrated approach to the use of the existing health and care resources - around £6bn in 2015/16 - as well as transformational changes in the way in which services are delivered across Greater Manchester.

……A focus on people and place

What Does Devolution Offer?

The MoU • Framework for delegation and ultimate devolution of health and social care

responsibilities to CCGs and local councils in GM • Sets out process for collaborative working from April 1 2015 and work

needed during 2015/16 to achieve full devolution and/or delegation in April 2016

• Agreement for parties agree to act in good faith to support the objectives and principles of the MoU for benefit of GM patients and citizens

• Includes all local authorities, all GM CCGs and NHSE • GMNHS Trusts, Foundation Trusts and the NW Ambulance Trust issued

letters of support • Allows GM to reshape how health and social care services are delivered -

estimated budget of £6 billion • Services will stay as part of the NHS or Councils but will be tailored to reflect

needs of residents • CCGs and Councils will keep existing accountabilities, legal obligations and

funding flows – ie responsibility for NHS funding stays with NHS and for local authority funding with local councils (not CA)

Devolution is the mechanism, not the master

79

What is the problem we are trying to solve…?

….devolution can be the trigger for greater and necessary positive reform

A growing ageing population

Poorer health & growth in chronic conditions

Instability & fragmentation in the health & care system

Consequences • Unplanned,

Haphazard change

• Poorer care and treatment

• Difficulty in meeting future health needs

• Failing the health & care workforce

Increasing pressure on health & social care

– Improving the health and well being of GM residents from early age to elderly - recognising will only be achieved with a focus on prevention of ill health and promotion of well being

– Moving from having some of the worst health outcomes to having some of the best and closing the health inequalities gap within GM and between GM and the rest of the UK faster

By: • Integrating care for a more holistic, co-ordinated approach • Putting experience of patient, carer and families at the centre of how

services are organised and delivered. • Making best use of existing budgets, including to improve

performance around reducing pressure on A&E and avoiding hospital admissions, where appropriate.

Objectives

• GM remains within NHS and social care system - uphold standards in national guidance and statutory duties in NHS Constitution and Mandate - and for delivery of social care and public health services

• Decisions will be focused on the interests and outcomes of patients

and people in GM - organisations will collaborate to prioritise those interests

• Decision making underpinned by transparency and open sharing of

information

• From 1 April 2015 ‘all decisions about GM will be taken with GM’

• GM will work collaboratively with local non GM bodies and take into account the impact of their decisions on them and their communities

Principles

82

Health devolution for Greater Manchester 25 February 2015 Greater Manchester is to become the first region in England to get full control of health spending.

Greater Manchester £6bn NHS budget devolution begins in April 27 February 2015 Greater Manchester will control a combined NHS and social care budget of £6bn Greater Manchester will begin taking control of its health budget from April after a devolution agreement was signed by the Chancellor George Osborne.”.

It's a historic day for Manchester, but not a 'town hall takeover' 27 February, 2015 | By Crispin Dowler NHS insiders in Greater Manchester have been pleasantly amazed by the speed at which negotiations progressed leading up to today’s historic agreement to devolve and integrate £6bn of health and social care spending for the conurbation.

Revealed: Details of £6bn Manchester health devolution plan 25 February, 2015 | By James Illman Radical plans for Greater Manchester to take control of £6bn of health and social care spending will be overseen by a new statutory body from April 2016, according to draft plans obtained by HSJ.

THE DEVOLUTION OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE HAS MADE NATIONAL HEADLINES; ILLUMINATING BOTH THE OPPORTUNITY BUT ALSO THE

EXPECTATION

83

Health & Social Care

NHS England Department of Health Monitor TDA NHS

Property

HM Treasury DCLG CQC

Public Health England

Health Education England

Step 1

DWP

H&SC Devolution Impacted Organisations(National):

Strategic Initiatives • Clinical & Financial Sustainability Plan (including CSR submissions) • Early Implementation Priorities • Mental Health Strategy • Research, Innovation & Economic Growth Strategy • Capital & Estates • Workforce Transformation • Support Services Strategy (overall efficiency and joint working developments)

Devolving & Integrating Responsibilities and Resource • Resources & Finance • Primary Care • Specialised Services • Prevention & Public Health • Workforce Training and Development & Support to Challenged Trusts

Establishing the Leadership, Governance & Accountability • Programme Board & Infrastructure • GM Health & Care Strategic Partnership Board • GM Joint Commissioning Board • GM Provider Forum • Establishing the Relationship with Regulators*

Enablers • OD & Leadership Development • Communications, Patient/Public Engagement • Information, data sharing and digital integration

WORKSTREAMS & WORK AREAS

• Devolution is not THE solution • £1bn gap

• Resistance • Pace required

• The Election? • Governance

• Provider organisations • CCGs • Regulators • DH

• Public Engagement • Supply side • NHS vs local government? • A National Service?

The Risks

www.gmahsn.org www.intohealth.org

Thank You