RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202, Rev. 4 - 'RT-100 Tie-Down Evaluation.'3.9 ASME B&PV Code, Section III, 2007...

CALC. NO. RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202F.3 E N E R C O N CALCULATION COVER SHEET REV. 4

Excellence-EveryPfOjeCL Every day.PAGE NO. 1 of 27

Title: RT-100 Tie-Down Evaluation Client: Robatel Technologies, LLC

Project: RTL-001

Item Cover Sheet Items Yes No

1 Does this calculation contain any open assumptions that require confirmation? El(If YES, Identify the assumptions) see Section 4

2 Does this calculation serve as an "Alternate Calculation"? (If YES, Identify the E]design verified calculation.)Design Verified Calculation No.

3 Does this calculation Supersede an existing Calculation? (If YES, identify the Lisuperseded calculation.)Superseded Calculation No.

Scope of Revision:

Revision 4 contains updates to design input drawings and calculation revisions.

Revision Impact on Results:

N/A

Study Calculation LI Final Calculation 19

Safety-Related Z Non-Safety Related El

(Print Name and Sign)

Originator: David Hartmangruber• Date: 01/03/2014

Design Verifier: Curt Lindner• Date: 01/03/2014

Approver: Nand Lambha Date: 01/03/2014

ENERCONCA NO. RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202

Ecelle ce--Eve, project. Everyday REVISION STATUS SHEETPAGE NO. 2 of 27

CALCULATION REVISION STATUS

REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION

0 10/08/2012 Initial Issue

1 08/30/2013 Incorporate design changes as shown on drawing revisions.

2 09/03/2013 Corrected broken Figure 2. All other changes remain marked fromRev. 1.

3 09/13/2013 Revised Design Input drawing and calculation revision numbers. Allother changes remain marked from Revisions 1 and 2.

4 01/03/2014 Revised design input drawing and calculation revision numbers.

PAGE REVISION STATUS

APPENDIX REVISION STATUS

APPENDIX NO.

1

2

PAGE NO.

All

All

REVISION NO. APPENDIX NO.

3

3

PAGE NO. REVISION NO.

CALCULATION CALC. NO. RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202

F."3 E N E R C O N DESIGN VERIFICATION REV. 4Excellence--Every project Every day CHECKLIST

Item CHECKLIST ITEMS Yes No NIA

Design Inputs - Were the design inputs correctly selected, referenced1 (latest revision), consistent with the design basis, and incorporated in the X

calculation?

2 Assumptions - Were the assumptions reasonable and adequately Xdescribed, justified and/or verified, and documented?

3 Quality Assurance - Were the appropriate QA classification andrequirements assigned to the calculation?

Codes, Standards, and Regulatory Requirements - Were the applicable4 codes, standards, and regulatory requirements, including issue and X

addenda, properly identified and their requirements satisfied?

5 Construction and Operating Experience - Have applicable constructionand operating experience been considered?

Interfaces - Have the design-interface requirements been satisfied, Xincluding interactions with other calculations?

7 Methods - Was the calculation methodology appropriate and properly Xapplied to satisfy the calculation objective?

Design Outputs - Was the conclusion of the calculation clearly stated, did8 it correspond directly with the objectives, and are the results reasonable X

compared to the inputs?

Radiation Exposure - Has the calculation properly considered radiationexposure to the public and plant personnel?

Acceptance Criteria - Are the acceptance criteria incorporated in the10 calculation sufficient to allow verification that the design requirements have X

been satisfactorily accomplished?

11 Computer Software- Is a computer program or software used, and if so,are the requirements of CSP 3.02 met?

COMMENTS

(Print Na e and Sign)

Design Verifier: Curt Lindner Date: / 3' )

Others: Date:

CALC. NO. RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202

IEi EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4Ehcee e .e y pr ,,e jal

PAGE NO. 4 of 27

Table of Contents

Calculation Cover Sheet ............................................................................................................................... 1Calculation Revision Status Sheet .......................................................................................................... 2Calculation Design Verification Plan and Sum m ary Sheet ...................................................................... 3Calculation Design Verification Checklist ................................................................................................. 41 Purpose and Scope ............................................................................................................................... 52 Sum m ary of Results and Conclusions .............................................................................................. 63 References ............................................................................................................................................. 74 Assum ptions .......................................................................................................................................... 85 Design Inputs ......................................................................................................................................... 96 M ethodology ........................................................................................................................................ 117 Calculations ......................................................................................................................................... 12

7.1 Load Calculation ......................................................................................................................... 127.2 Lifting Pocket Tie-Down Evaluation ....................................................................................... 127.3 Tie-Down Devices Evaluation ................................................................................................ 13

7.3.1 Tie-Down Forces ..................................................................................................................... 147.3.2 Tie-down arm evaluation ................................................................................................... 177.3.3 Tension on net section at hole: ........................................................................................... 177.3.4 Contact bearing at lifting hole: ............................................................................................ 187.3.5 Edge tearout: .......................................................................................................................... 187.3.6 Arm Tension: ........................................................................................................................... 187.3.7 Tie-down arm weld stresses .............................................................................................. 19

7.4 Shear Stop Load Evaluation .................................................................................................. 237.5 Failure of Cask Tie-Down Arm s Under Excessive Loads ...................................................... 23

8 F ig u re s ................................................................................................................................................. 2 4

Appendix 1 - Utility 4000A Flatbed Truck Dim ensions and Properties ............................................ 4 pagesAppendix 2 - Cask Design Input Em ail ............................................................................................. 5 pages


I, EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4Ficelence- -vryp rojPcf dvry aa

PAGE NO. 5 of 27

Purpose and Scope

Robatel Technologies is designing the RT-100 transport cask, containing radioactive wastein the form of dewatered resins and filters. The RT-100 transport cask is required to meetthe requirements of 10 CFR Part 71 (Ref. 3.1). This calculation demonstrates that thispackage satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 71.45 (Ref. 3.1) under the normal tie-downconditions. The NRC requirements in Reference 3.1 state that any tie-down attachmentthat is a structural part of the package must be designed to withstand transportationstresses with appropriate safety factors. The RT-100 package is designed with two tie-down arms, attached to the cask sidewall, for securing the assembled cask duringtransport. Failure of the tie-down mechanism under excessive load must not impair theability of the cask to meet the requirements of Subpart E of Reference 3.1. Any otherstructural part that could be used to tie down the package must be capable of beingrendered inoperable for tying down the package during transport, or must be designed withstrength equivalent to that required for the tie-down attachments. The purpose of thiscalculation is to structurally qualify the fully-loaded RT-100 transport cask for the loadingsassociated with transport activities, including dead weight and payload weight with theappropriate dynamic factors, for the normal transport conditions.


~3EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4rellenre-I-e proP y do.,*

PAGE NO. 6 of 27

2 Summary of Results and Conclusions

All structural members have a factor of safety of greater than 1.0 under the most adverseeffects from the transport activities for the normal transport conditions. Based on tie-downarm thickness of 35 mm, the minimum factor of safety is 1.06 at the tie-down arms. Basedon the dimensions shown on Reference 3.4, the minimum weld factor of safety is 1.72 atthe tie-down plate to cask body weld. For a minimum thickness of 32 mm, the factor ofsafety is reduced to 1.06 at the tie-down arm. Thus all welds and connections are qualifiedfor the design loads. The failure of the structural tie-down devices under excessive loadsdoes not impair the ability of the cask to meet the other regulatory requirements of thecask. The results of the analysis show that the RT-100 cask can withstand the requiredtransport activities for the normal transport conditions. The shear stops shall be designedin accordance with all loads and requirements given in Section 7.3.1 (d). Note: the latterstatement is an unverified assumption as discussed in Section 4.3.

Therefore, provided the shear stops that are designed in accordance with Section 7.3.1.dare utilized during transportation, then the members and welds of the RT-100 transportcask are adequate for their design function under the normal tie-down condition.


tA EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4t cej enre -- Eeryprompt! rvpryadc

PAGE NO. 7 of 27

3 References

3.1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10 CFR Part 71, "Packaging and Transportation ofRadioactive Material"

3.2 ROBATEL Industries Drawing RT100-PE-1001-1, "ROBATEL Transport Package RT

100 General Assy Sheet 1/2," Rev. H

3.3 ROBATEL Industries Drawing RT100-PE-1001-2, "ROBATEL Transport Package RT100 General Assy Sheet 2/2," Rev. H

3.4 ROBATEL Industries Drawing 102885 MD 1011-09, "ROBATEL Transport PackageRT 100 s/e Emballage Plan De Debit Fourrure D'Arrimage," Rev. B

3.5 Omer W. Blodgett, "Design of Welded Structures", 1966

3.6 ENERCON Calculation RTL-001-CALC-ST-0201 Rev. 5, "Lifting Evaluation"

3.7 ENERCON Calculation RTI_-001-CALC-ST-0203 Rev. 6, "Bolting Evaluation"

3.8 ASME B&PV Code, Section II, 2007

3.9 ASME B&PV Code, Section III, 2007

3.10 ENERCON Calculation RTL-001-CALC-ST-0101 Rev. 0, "RT-100 Weight and Centerof Gravity Calculation"

3.11 AISC Manual of Steel Construction, 7 th edition

3.12 Hibbeler, R.C., Mechanics of Materials, 6 th ed, 2005


~ EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4It.Cellence--tverypro,?ac rv'eryday

PAGE NO. 8 of 27

4 Assumptions

4.1. The weight of the cask for the tie-down evaluation is considered as the total weightof the cask and the maximum payload. This assumption is acceptable withoutfurther evaluation.

4.2. The dimensions and properties of the Utility 4000A flatbed truck (Appendix 1) willbe utilized as a typical truck for determination of the cask tie-down configuration, asneeded for evaluation. Minor variations between different flatbed transport truckswill not have a significant impact on the analysis results. This assumption isacceptable without further evaluation.

4.3. The truck used for transport of the RT100 cask will be specially designed for thecask tie-down configuration, including shear stops and integral support locations inline with the cask tie-down arms. The loads for the shear stops will be provided inthis calculation for use in the design at a later date. For this calculation to be valid,these shear stops must be designed in accordance with all loads and requirementsgiven in Section 7.3.1 (d). This is an unverified assumption that requiresverification.

4.4. It is possible for the center of gravity of the payload to shift ±10% of the interiordimensions of the cask containment (Ref. 3.10). The payload is significantly lighterthan the fully loaded cask. Therefore, this shift has no significant effect on the tie-down conditions since the change in payload location will have an inconsequentialeffect of the center of gravity of the fully-assembled, loaded cask, resulting in amaximum change of less than 4 cm in the overall center of gravity, which isapproximately a 2.5% change (Ref. 3.10). Only the overall center of gravity locationis used for this calculation. This assumption is acceptable without furtherevaluation.

4.5. The slight asymmetry in the tie-down arm design which enables the cables orchains from opposite arms to clear one another is ignored. Instead averagedimensions are utilized. This assumption is acceptable without further evaluation.

4.6. A sliding friction coefficient of pj=0.05 is assumed for a metal cask on a metal bed inopen vehicles. This assumption is conservative and requires no further evaluation.

There are no additional unverified assumptions in this calculation. Other designassumptions used, if any, will be noted and referenced as needed in the body of thecalculation.


SE N E R CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4E ce ,'enr -Every prolPa /:vpryaao

PAGE NO. 9 of 27

5 Design Inputs

5.1 The total weight of the fully assembled cask is 34,696 kg (Ref. 3.2).

5.2 The maximum payload weight is 15,000 Ibs, or 6,803.9 kg (see Appendix 2).Conservatively, a value of 7,060 kg will be used for the evaluation.

5.3 Per 10 CFR 71.45(b) (Ref. 3.1), any tie-down attachment that is a structural part ofthe package must be capable of withstanding, without generating stress in anymaterial of the package in excess of its yield strength, a static force applied to thecenter of gravity of the package having a vertical component of 2 times the weightof the package and its contents, a horizontal component along the direction inwhich the vehicle travels of 10 times the weight of the package and its contents anda horizontal component in the transverse direction of 5 times the weight of thepackage and its contents. These factors will therefore be used in determining theresultant loads on the tie-down arms from the restrained package during transport.

5.4 The material properties used for the cask shell and the tie-down arms shall be asgiven in Table 1, unless rioted otherwise. The allowable values used are for the50oC (Ref 3.1, Section 71.43 (g)).

5.5 A value of 9.81 m/s 2 will be used for the gravitational acceleration.

5.6 A value of 0.3 will be used for the Poisson's Ratio of all stainless steel inaccordance with Table NF.-2 of Reference 3.8.


E'4 EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4

PAGE NO. 10 of 27

Table 1. Material Properties(1 )

Strength (MPa)

Material Temp. Membrane(0C) Yield Ultimate Allowable(Sy) (Su) (Sm)

-30 207 517 138

20 207 517 138

50 199 511 138ASTM A240 Type 304/304L 65 184 496 138

(Dual certified)(Cask Body,(2) 100 170 485 138

150 154 456 138

200 144 442 139

250 135 437 122

-30 448 621 207=Su/3

20 448 621 207

50 437 621 207

ASTM SA-240/UNS No. S31803 65 418 620 207(Tie-Down Arms, Support Plate) 100 395 619 206

150 370 598 199

200 354 577 193

250 344 564 188

Fluxinox 22.9.3L.(Appendix 2 pg 3&4) 450 690

(Weld material for Arm to Plate weld)In-Flux Sterlingo 308L(Appendix 2 pg 3&5) 420 586

(Weld material for Plate to Cask weld)

Notes:

1. Material properties are taken from ASME B&PV Code, Sectioninterpolation.

II, Part D (Ref. 3.8) by

2. Cask material is being procured as dual-certified SA-240 Type 304/304L.


F1EN E R CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4celencme- ,eyqpojm ,ey Jay

PAGE NO. 11 of 27

6 Methodology

The RT-100 transport cask is a safety-related structure in accordance with 10 CFR Part 71(Ref. 3.1). The cask consists of a stainless steel containment structure with a leadshielding panel between the inner and outer cask walls, ductile stainless steel and foamupper and lower impact limiters, a pair of concentric, removable stainless steel cask lidsand a pair of stainless steel tie-down arms on opposite sides of the cask body (Ref. 3.2).Per Design Input 5.3, safety factors of 2, 10 and 5 is used in the vertical and horizontaldirections for determining the weight of the assembled cask for transport restraint.

The evaluation of the RT-100 cask tie-down arms and outer shell is provided in thisdocument to show that they meet all of the applicable requirements of 10 CFR 71.45(Ref. 3.1) for the combined weight of the assembled cask and the payload. The tie-downarms, with a total of four attachment points, are designed to resist the combination of loadsin the three orthogonal directions. An evaluation is provided to demonstrate that failure ofthe tie-down arms under excessive load will not impair the cask's ability to meet the otherapplicable requirements of Reference 3.1 in Section 7.5.


~%JEN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4Lc,!c e ce ý,erypro-pcr t1rda

PAGE NO. 12 of 27

7 Calculations

NOTE: In many cases, calculations are made using exact values with many significantdigits, not the rounded numbers shown. Therefore, in certain situations, the numbersdisplayed may not be capable of providing the final solution due to the rounding. Usingexact numbers, however, provides the most accurate solution possible.

7.1 Load Calculation

See Section 5 (Design Inputs) of this calculation for a list of all applicable loads andsafety factors and Section 6.0 (Methodology) for the applicable methodology andrestraint conditions. The detailed calculation of loads follows.

Package Loads

Gravitational Acceleration, g = 9.81 m/s2 (Design Input 5.5)

Cask Mass, Mc = 34,696kg (Design Input 5.1)

Payload Mass, Mp = 7060 kg (Design Input 5.2)

Total Mass, M = Mc + Mp = 41,756 kg, use 42,000 kg

Total Weight, W = M x g = 412.02 kN

Vertical Dynamic Factor, dv = 2 (Design Input 5.3)

Axial Dynamic Factor, da = 10 (Design Input 5.3)

Transversal Dynamic Factor, dL = 5 (Design Input 5.3)1 kN

Vertical Load, P, = M x g x dv = 42000 x 9.81 x 2 x 100 oN = 824.0 kN

1 kNAxial Load, Pa = M x g x da = 42000 x 9.81 x 10 x 100 N= 4120.2 kN

IkNTransverse Load, PL = M x g x dL = 42000 x 9.81 x 5 x N = 2060.1 kN

7.2 Lifting Pocket Tie-Down Evaluation

Per 10 CFR 71.45(b) (Ref. 3.1), any structural part of the package, other than thosecomponents designated and designed for restraint activities, that could be used torestrain the package must be capable of being rendered inoperable for restraining thepackage during transport, or must be designed with strength equivalent to that requiredfor tie-down attachments. The lifting pockets can be rendered inoperable through theuse of padlocks on the lifting eyes provided in each of the lifting pockets. (Ref. 3.6) Alllifting devices for secondary lifts (i.e., for lifting the impact limiters separately from theassembled package) will be removed from the package during transport. (Ref. 3.6) Thelifting pockets will not be used for restraining the load during transport and therefore donot need to be designed for the restraint loads. The lifting pockets are acceptablewithout further evaluation.

CALC. NO. RTL-0O1-CALC-ST-0202

, EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4fr (e11enrP-- Eery proPc' Evpryd

PAGE NO. 13 of 27

7.3 Tie-Down Devices Evaluation

The cask is restrained by the use of two tie-down arms on the cask sidewalls, onopposite sides of the cask body, with two attachment eyes on each tie-down arm(Ref. 3.2). The assembled cask is attached to the flatbed truck with straps or cablesattached to the tie-down arm attachment eyes. The cask tie-down load is consideredas the total weight of the fully-assembled cask, including the payload, with the requireddynamic factors applied to the three orthogonal load directions. Four shear stopsprevent movement of the base of the package. (Assumption 4.1, 4.3)

The geometric configuration of the tie-down system was selected such that:

1. The resultant tie-down arm tensile loads are tangent to the cask surface in orderto minimize the effects of out-of-plane stresses in the cask shell. See Figure 2and Figure 3 for determination of the tie-down geometry.

2. The shear stops loads are transferred to the cask surface via compression in thelower impact limiter.

Each tie-down arm has a unique horizontal angle to the cask body that allows the tie-down cables or chains that connect opposite arms to the truck bed to clear oneanother. This slight asymmetry with respect to the dimensions of the arms is ignored(Assumption 4.5); however, the variance in horizontal angles must be evaluated todetermine the bounding forces. Reference 3.3 shows the cask with the tie-down arms.The horizontal angles from the cask body to each arm varies from 400 and 440 on oneend of the cask (at position 00 on the drawing) and 370 and 410 on the other end (atposition 1800 on the drawing). The cask is designed to be installed on the truck withthe 1800 position toward the front of the truck and the 00 position toward the rear of thetruck. For this calculation, the actual travel position is not relevant but is used fordescriptive purposes only to allow identification of the specific tie-down arms. Referringto Reference 3.3, the front arms are identified as View Q and R with horizontal anglesof 370 and 410, respectively. The rear arms are identified as View L and M withhorizontal angels of 440 and 400, respectively. During movement, different pairs ofarms are in tension depending on the load. For longitudinal loads (direction of travel),either the front arms are in tension or the rear arms. For lateral load, opposite sets ofarms are in tension, one front arm and the corresponding rear arm on the same side,depending on the direction of travel. For the vertical load, all four arms are in tension.This calculation determines the tension for each direction based on the average of theangles in tension. The options are: listed in Table 2.

Table 2. Tie-down Arms Horizontal Angles

Load Arms in tension Angles Average Angle

Longitudinal L & M (Rear) 44 and 40 42Q & R (Front) 37 and 41 39

Lateral M & R 40 and 41 40.5L & Q 44 and 37 40.5

Vertical L, M, Q, R 44, 40, 37, 41 40.5


t.'4 EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4týre 'ente- Everyplopct tvery L Cy

PAGE NO. 14 of 27

The evaluation is bounded by analyzing the high average angle (420) caused bylongitudinal forces on the tie-down arms on the rear of the cask, and the low averageangle (390) caused by longitudinal forces on the tie-down arms on the front of the cask.

7.3.1 Tie-Down Forces

The analytical model for determining the loads that are required to prevent rotation andtranslation of the package due to the applied loads is shown in Figure 3. The shearstop forces at the bottom of the package are represented by the orthogonalcomponents of a single force vector, S, making an angle of y with the global y-axis(Figure 3).

The stresses in the members are determined by considering the component loads(10W, 5W, and 2W) individually and superimposing the results. A detailed forceanalysis is conducted using the notations shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, and otherterms defined below.

The following is a list of terms that are constant for the front arms and rear armscalculations:

Total weight of cask, W = 412.02 kN (Section 7.1)

Impact limiter radius, R = 2587/2 = 1293 mm (Ref. 3.2)

Cask radius, r = 2040/2 + 60 = 1080 mm (Ref. 3.2)

Cask Center of Gravity height, d = 1648 mm (Ref. 3.2)

Average tie-down eye height, t = (1379 + 1479)/2 = 1429 mm (Ref. 3.3)

Average vertical downward angle of arms, 0 = (32+27-) x (Ref. 3.3)2 180

= 0.5148721 radians

The following variables are defined in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The values for thesedepends on whether the front or rear arms are considered. The variables arecalculated below for both conditions.

Effective length of tie-down arm, i.e. distance between tie-down tangent point and

center of tie-down attachment eye, L, mm (Ref. 3.3)

Average tie-down eye X axis offset, x' = r cos 4P - a, mm

Average tie-down eye Y axis offset, y' = r sin (b + b, mm

Cask tangent height, z' = t + c, mm

a = L cos 0 sin 4, mm

b = L cos 0 cos (p, mm

c = Lsin 0, mm

Average horizontal angle of arm from cask body, 01, radians


~4 EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4fxcellen(e -- Every projpctvefyday

PAGE NO. 15 of 27

The values for each of the above variables are calculated for the front and rear armsand are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Calculated values for Tie-Down Arms

Rear Arms Front Arms0 (440 & 40-) => 0.733038 rad (41' & 370) =,- 0.680678 rad

a 351.47 mm 365.61 mmb 390.34 mm 451.49 mmc 297.18 mm 328.69 mmL (616 + 591)/2 = 603.5 mm (682 + 653)12 = 667.5 mmx 451.13 mm 473.71 mmy' 1113.01 mm 1131.16 mmz' 1726.18 mm 1757.69 mm

Equations for the forces on the tie-down arms are determined in the following sections.

The forces consist of the following:

Tensile force in member 2 and 3 resulting from 5W load, Tx

Tensile force in member 1 and 2 resulting from 1OW load, Ty

Tensile force in each member resulting from 2W load, Tz

Total tensile force in subscripted member, Tmax

Total force in the x direction resulting from 5W load, Fx

Total force in the y direction resulting from 1OW load, Fy

Note: Per Assumption 4.5, the slight asymmetry in the tie-down arm is ignored andaverage dimensions are used.

a) Considering only the 1OW load, in the -Y direction, and summing moments aboutthe axis y=-R:

Mx =0 2Ty 2Ty x (y' - b + R) + xz' = 1OWd

Solving for Ty:

1OWdTy =bTy (' x (y'- b + R) + X z')

b) Considering only the 5W load, in the X direction, and summing moments about the

axis x=R:

My =0 = 2Tx (L) x (R - a - x') + x z') = 5Wd

Solving for Tx

5WdTx = 2(x (R-a-x') + aX z)


SEN E R CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4en F 1:er p e -- t- ey P,.,ocr ,¢e"y day

PAGE NO. 16 of 27

c) Considering only the 2W load, in the Z direction, and summing up vertical force:

Fz = 0 4Tz () = 2W

Solving for Tz:

2WTz =

The force in the most loaded member, which is member 2 in this case,

Tmax =Tx+ Ty + Tz + Ti

Where Ti is the initial member tension that can be estimated or measured. Ti willbe neglected except for its effect on the member. Tax can be in any member sincethe regulations do not specify the directions of the forces but only the line of action.

d) Then to balance the force in the X direction:

F× = 0 = 2Tx T + Fxx = 5W

solving for Fxx

Fxx = 5W - 2Tx (-)

e) To balance the force in the Y direction:

Fy =0 == 2Ty(b) + Fyy = 1oW

solving for Fyy

Fyy = 1lOW -2Tyj)

f) Summation of the force in the Z direction, noting from above that:

4Tz (S) - 2W = 0, and

Fn = 2Tx(D) + 2Ty (c) + [4'rz(~ 2W]

Fn = 2Tx() + 2Ty(Q)

Fn = 2 () (Tx + Ty)

g) Now, the friction force can be determined as:

2cFf = [IFn = L x"(Tx + Ty)

where p = 0.05 for a metal cask on a metal bed in open vehicles. (Assumption 4.6)The force Fxx and Fyy are the resultant force of the friction force and the resistanceof the shear stop. Since there are 2 shear stops in action, the design loads for eachshear stop are.


,E4 N E R CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4b.•llence -PveAyprolGCE NvO1c7oyd

PAGE NO. 17 of 27

Sx = (Fxx - Ff sin y)

Sy =(Fy-Fcoy 2SY=(Fyy - Ff cosy)Sy= 2

where y is the direction of the vectorial resultant of the 1OW and 5W loads asmeasured from the Y axis, i.e.:

5y = a tan - = 26.6 degrees

10

Table 4. Calculated Forces for Tie-Down Arms

Rear Arms Front ArmsTx 1361.26 kN 1430.82 kNTy 1609.56 kN 1571.40 kNTz 418.36 kN 418.36 kNTmax 3389.18 kN 3420.58 kNFxx 474.56 kN 492.68 kNFyy 2038.07 kN 1994.43 kNEn 2925.80 kN 2956.73 kN

_Ff 146.29 kN 147.84 kNSx 204.57 kN 213.28 kNSY 953.61 kN 931.10 kN

The results of the force calculation that are presented in Table 4 show that the frontarms with the lower horizontal angle are subjected to the greater forces. Theevaluation of the longitudinal loads on the two front tie-down arms bounds theevaluation of all other load conditions on the cask. The tension calculations and safetymargin evaluations contained in the following sections focuses on the front tie-downarms.

7.3.2 Tie-down arm evaluation - maximum thickness of 35 mm

The tie-down arms are shown on Reference 3.3, which shows that the arms have amaximum thickness of 35 mm and a minimum thickness of 32 mm. The followingcalculations are performed for the maximum thickness arm.

The maximum tie-down arm load of 3420.58 kN was determined in Table 4 above.

Stress for the tie-down arm and its connection to the exterior cask shell are shown asfollows:

Tension on net section at hole:

a= = 437.2 MPa @ 50'C

Anet = 2(200 - 90)25 + (260 - 90)35 = 11450 mm 2

Tmax 3420.58 X 10 3 NGnet Anet 11450 x 10-6 298.74 MPa

(Table 1)


~J EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4t•ffilenre •-1very, ro•cr e-vefy doi

PAGE NO. 18 of 27

(Yallow 437.2 MPaFactor of Safety = = - = 1.460 net 298.74 MPa

Contact bearing at liftinq hole:

oallow = 1.35oy = 1.35 x 437.2 MPa = 590.2 MPa (Ref. 3.11)

Anet = 90(2 x 25 + 35) = '7650 mm 2

Tmnax 3420.58 x 103 NDbrg A-et 7650 x 10-6m = 447.13 MPa

Fallow 590.2 MPaFactor of Safety = =- = 1.32

0brg 447.13 MPaEdge tear out:

Based on the maximum-distortion-energy theory for a ductile material in pure shear

(Ref. 3.12),

Tallow = 0.6"y = 0.6 x 437.2 MPa = 262.32 MPa

Anet = 2(2 x 110 x 25 + 110 x 35) = 18700 mm 2

Tmax 3420.58 x 103 NS170.. =182.92 MPa

Anet 18700 x 10-6 inT[allow 262.32 MPaFactor of Safety = -= - = 1.43

T' 182.92 MPa

Arm Tension:

Gallow = oy = 437.2 MPa

Aarm = 260 x 35 = 9100 mm 2

Tmnax 3420.58 x 103 N-arm -ar 9100 x 10-6 m = 375.89 MPa

Oallow 437.2 MPaFactor of Safety == 1.16

,arm 375.89 MPa

7.3.3 Tie-down arm evaluation - minimum thickness of 32 mm

Tension on net section at hole:

Uallow = Oy = 437.2 MPa @ 50'C (Table 1)

Anet = 2(200 - 90)25 + (260 - 90)32 = 10,940 mm 2

Tmnax 3420.58 x 10 3 N-net- - =31 . a

Anet 10940 x 0 312.6 MPaGallow 437.2 MIN

Factor of Safety = Oajeo =37.6 M-a = 1.40O'net 31.Ma


IE EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4f celne -- i eqp r '

PAGE NO. 19 of 27

Contact bearing at lifting hole:

Gal.ow = 1.35cry = 1.35 x 437.2 MPa = 590.2 MPa (Ref. 3.11)

Anet = 90(2 x 25 + 32) = 7380 mm 2

Tmax 3420.58 x 103 N-brg Anet 7380 x 10-6 M.. 463.4 MPa

Callow 590.2 MPaFactor of Safety = - 463.4 MPa = 1.27O

0brg 46.Ma

Edge tear out:

Based on the maximum-distortion-energy theory for a ductile material in pure shear(Ref. 3.12),

"ranow = 0.6cay = 0.6 x 437.2 MPa = 262.32 MPa

Anet = 2(2 x 110 x 25 + 110 x 32) = 18040 mm 2

Tmax 3420.58 x 103 NS.... = 189.57 MPa

Anet 18040 x 10.6 m

Tallow 262.32 MPaFactor of Safety = - = 1.38

T 189.57 MPa

Arm Tension:

0caiow = oy = 437.2 MPa

Aarm = 260 X 32 = 8320 rrinil2

Tniax 3420.58 x 10 3 N(arm - Aarm 8320 x 10-6 M =411.4MPa

(Talow 437.2 MPaFactor of Safety = -= 4. = 1.06

Oarn 411.04 MPa

7.3.4 Tie-down arm weld stresses

The stresses in the welds attaching the main arm of the tie-down arm to the cask bodyplates are found by applying the loads from the attachment arms to the weld around theperimeter of the plates. The maximum load on the tie-down arm welds will be the sumof the loads in two connecting arms. Thus, from inspection of Figure 3, the maximumtie-down arm load is

F = 2Tx + Ty + 2Tz = 2 x 1430.82 + 1571.40 + 2 x 418.36 = 5269.76 kN

b 451.49Weld Axial Load, Fx = F- = 5269.76 x - = 3564.43 kN

L 667.5c 328.69

Weld Vertical Load, Fy = F- = 5269.76 x = 2594.96 kN

a 365.61Weld Transverse Load, Fz = .F- = 5269.76 x = 2886.42 kN

L 667.5


•1 E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4Exce~lence--Every project Everyday

PAGE NO. 20 of 27

Arm tensile strength: 437.2 MPa (Table 1)

Cask tensile strength: 199.3 MPa (Table 1)

Weld tensile strength:

= 450 MPa, weld between tie-down arm and plate (Table 1)

= 420 MPa, weld between tie-down plate and cask (Table 1)

The weld length, b, is:

b= rx(41+37)xT = 1080x(41+37)XlT =1583.36 mm180 180

The weld height, d, for weld between tie-down plate and cask body is (Ref. 3.4):

d = 620 - 410 tan 29.5 = 388.03 mm

The weld height, d, for the weld between the tie-down arm and the plate is 260 mm.(Ref. 3.4)


EI EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4-xce~wne E)e, yp roer iveyac,

PAGE NO. 21 of 27

FILLET WELD EVALUATION:

DESCRIPTION: (joint, loading., members, etc.)

Weld Between Tie-Down Arm and Plate

See Reference 3.2 for weld infornation

Y

Cxj

X- + x-

WELD PROPERTIES ARE AS FOLLOWS:h 1.583 in

d= 0.26 in

Cy = b/2 = 0.79 in

Cx d/2 0.13 in

Aw=2b= 3.17 in

Sx=bd = 0.41 in3 / in

Sy =b2/3 0.84 m- / ni

Jw = b(.3d 2 + b2 )/6 0.71 in / in

W ELD (LXX) STRENGTH = Fw = 450.0BASE METAL STRENGTH (FY)= [437.0

LOADING AT CENTER OF PATTERN:

Fx = 3564.4329 kNFy = [2594.95541 kN

Fz = r2886.4209 kN

YX xLocal

Coordinates

MPa Weld size = 10-022

MPa Thicknicss =r0.022 In

(Smallcr of weld size or base metal thickness)

(using local coordinate previously defined)

Mx =

My=

Mz =

kN-inkN-mkN-m

WELD STRESS 1S AS FOLLOWS:

Fz Mx Myft = + - + -=

Aw x-', Sy

Fx Mz(Cx)tvx = i+

Aw jw

911.69 kN/m

1125.85 kN/m

Fy Mz(Cy)lk3, _ + -

Aw % Jw

fw (fi 2+ fvx +fvy-" 2=

819.63 kN/ni

1664.49 kN/m

Weld Allowable Stress = 0.6(Fw)(W eld Sia!)(1000) = 5940 MPaBase Metal Shear Allowable = 0.6(FY)(Thick)(1000V0.7071 8158 MPaFS FOR WELD MEIAL STRESS = 3.569 > 1.0 WELD STRESS IS O.K.FSFORBASEMETALSHEAR= 4.901 > 1.0 BASEMETAL SHEAR IS O.K.


t.-3 EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4t~celenre veyp,'•cr Eeryday

PAGE NO. 22 of 27

FILLET WELD EVALUATION:

DESCRIPTION: (joint, loading, members, etc.)Weld Between Tie-dowvn Plate and Cask BodySee Reference 3.2 for weld infornation

Y

WELD PROPERTIES ARE AS FOLLOWS:

d = 1 0.3881 m

Cy =b!2= 0.79 inCx= d/2 = 0.19 mAw=2b = 3.17 in

X-

Y

xLocal

CoordinatesSx=bd =

Sy =b2/3 =

Jw = b(3d2 + b)/6=

0.61 rn3/m

0.84 & / mn

0.78 mn4 /in

WELD (EXX) STRENGTH = Fw = 420.0BASE METAL STRENGTH (FY)= 199.3

LOADING AT CENTER OF PATTERN:

MPa Weldsize=L0.017 mMPa Thickness =0.017 m

(Smaller ofweld size or base metal thickness)(using local coordinate previously defined)

Fx 3564.4329Fy = 12594.9554Fz 2886.4209

kNkNkN

Mx =

My

Mz =

0 kN-m0kN-m0 kN-m

WELD STRESS IS AS FOLLOWS:

Fz Mx Myft- + - + - =

Aw Sx Sy

Fx MNz.Cx)f-x = 4 - =

911.69 kN/mFy Mz(Cy)

tVY - + = 819.63 kN/mAw Jw

1125.85 kN/m fW = (ft2 + f'x I+ fVY2 )11 = 1664.49 kN/mAw Jw

Weld Allowable Stress = 0.6(Fw)(Weld Size)(1000)= 4284 MPaBase Metal Shear Allowable = 0.6(FY)(Weld)(1000)/0.7071 2875 MPaFS FOR WELD METAL STRESS = 2.574 > 1.0 WELD STRESS IS O.K.FS FORBASE METAL SHEAR- 1.727 > 1.0 BASE METAL SHEAR IS O.K.

CALC. NO. RTL-O01-CALC-ST-0202

EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4t •ce/lence tveryprojecr tveryday

PAGE NO. 23 of 27

7.4 Shear Stop Load Evaluation

The base of the cask will be restrained against movement in the axial and transversedirections through the use of shear stops welded to the top of the specially designedflatbed truck (see Figure 1). These shear stops will be designed and evaluated as partof the flatbed truck and are not considered here.

7.5 Failure of Cask Tie-Down Arms Under Excessive Loads

The smallest tie-down arms factor of safety is 1.16 against tie-down arm tension. For aminimum thickness of 32 mm, the factor of safety is reduced to 1.06 at the tie-downarm. Therefore, under excessive loading, the failure of the tie-down arms will occur bynecking of the tie-down arm. This will not impair the package's ability to meet otherregulatory requirements since the tie-down arms are welded to a plate that is in turnwelded to the cask body. Damage to the tie-down arm will not damage any componentintegral to the cask body and will therefore not compromise the cask body shell.


I!'I EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4cpiewe- feA Epro,• NO,24y 2PAGE NO. 24 of 27

8 Figures


O E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4PAGE NO. 25 of 27

Figure 1. Cask to Flatbed Configuration Sketch (see Appendix 1)

36 1/2

96

REAR VIEW FRONT VIEW


E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4PAGE NO. 26 of 27

Figure 2. Tie-Down Arm Geometry

r CL

- YHc

tangent ZR a

y

x


0 EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 4

PAGE NO. 27 of 27

Figure 3. Tie-Down Free Body Diagram

,Tx, Ty

Ty

X

TZj,

AYT

L2W-~ C

~ 5 -

T __ -d

{TxJZ [ za

TZ~


•4 E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 3.,cedence vYryprojerr -orydoy (Appendix 1)

PAGE NO. 1 of 4

Appendix I

Utility 4000A Flatbed Truck Dimensions and Properties


t.3 EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 3t ýce, r ..... very o. ... r ry pal (Appendix 1)

PAGE NO. 2 of 4

4000ATM Specifications Page 1 of I

0lemter Loneaff Uned Traders

Cr12 iCý& State Onferr Nvarn Sub

RESOURCES PaRT% SEP-ACE CO0-2nd

PRESS ROOM

Fealtues Options Sp-ecificatilos Gallery4000A-

crosa ls~ors

Fioed Air RideSuspension Loeation

Floor Type

Fl aml StlbltrnFi ledy SoltrorrAssartrlyFlriflh

Hteretdnck-on Air RideSurur e•i lrtaj at

A.o-

Hub Piloted S.Irue o%*M0 ultsad[l)ums

UTM 0ia- Er•ne, Frnohr-- Prn UrerOnal or, alt Sie! Slnows.rraoA OreA reu.r. tanninMaend Fnoir Boor Rl-J Prenerat.ve Coraeirq on Corn rerebers, Unrterorqe and InboardSurme on mn - Beamr

X'Jieel Ifle.r rierrioero .-r t ertLire JUIlLenoSh

Drt:pehnrr Lobctrornn t 9.O-I r' Cente, jIe to Rear

1 lt/d"E4rdedlhrmr m Flat Top FlIor ah 4 H•Cndoodn,1iI Sllrpo

14"tSleel naTro.fil PI Ae

FHenbnn•,nAtNI 23lIlr.,r-tA PoPe

r:r, iartl~Cao 0 •rr.errr i-1 /2", 7" Rol=e:

CPurchasing

Reqned a ,ajoeFind a Denter

Doadoads8Rth- . Flethuer

Date SheetSales Sheet

VWarantyE-Yhe'f t "-e nld n.]•m tJ ~ b "OWHY ai ae wr -raq~v nian ti-1h cmoin IsDitty tre a5-naadrlnj Copnnann 1inbadled irya S-'vent a.n.rartairat.'y

inepin pe T I r-, r'e00,003 PS otonin FIlang

Main H oee UT M ontirre Pea Jnat 6 tWre 'cab e Hirrez nh Irirea G ron-1rd and 7Wlay P ug

Oil halo SteSeals ,SortIr P 01 Sneol t-uarran HP or Dl,ýn Seal ReqLuire lot Sterao S-reooPF•nner, PertetoronSnntocajrr•e[

Oidtnze.s 3 .nmernre Ttoo OlrdgersnEair Side

P.o-odCop.ca6ty J0.0t0lJl tisPtaooCnpnate

Pipe Spoocs

Rutme DOck 0i.w $on Rear Rail

SideRlail

Slopf.ailhrluUghtHConfiguration

Tha Flnite

New traoters RetDry Yen,. V•

Renter TbrF "ibean ReTodthner Phi

Used Trailers

Dealer Locttor

E rrurlnd.Ulrnnnarur or 2Nrenico, LP,-o Cernind beanren P lrketarMeet,'. ra-ler Co19a AtronrernsDnor" Rmenneteni)

) 3.-12 0 R111c siýirrFryS Mouanted On nitear R.wl

Fvlr-,d•R.n SHnl e Pr d -.i h Wreerj 1 Tin& rnRo.ade .re•.ltrt' n, .r lrtayllntndrea

OrcLn CL L ir.rrcpIToiflrn Liohtn

M,1 SDctra G.COC P Sl Tup Ftoce

sourcesyutddyo

toesO a Cwetoes 8 ideosrOmnnom

Lre Cat1 Inspenlon

Crea, artalC errtmf(alo

COilnparlyAbout Us

StD'salrstlyCareefsCordea Lit

tRess HnsrrNress Oi. coonsIn The Media

UtlLopi.:m

.oin Mailing Uis:

Yoro- Losildrf sS SIGIUP

Find Us On:

Hone PFoeyvPilcy Site di~laener Contaco diltIti Oilily trarler Mrarctedrrt-ry Canpany SaR~eroFoeer.erl

http:/Avww.utilitytrailer.com/trailers/flatbeds/4000a/specifi cations 6/4/2 012


) E N E R C N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET V. 3(Appendix 1)PAGE NO. 3 of 4

0]

Visit our website at www.uilltytbailer.com/flatbods to see more features and options The RFart Ease In wraliere


0 E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 3(Appendix 1)

PAGE NO. 4 of 4

Our00 Stndr Fetue Exee Inusr Standards

0o0,500 Ib. Working Load Uff*Rafted Pipe SpoolsIlht4's sl drI• ,d t wi•ll t.-A hci.rs, rkul I ally weh0od

ppe *YM umsUrpa< C- 0 T tequireftitL s load seicurrewnlpoin s

One-Pbece Pi na-Cut Main Beam WelbsFor slrenqlh and iurabl tV litlity tlatbeds feature ari-ber-0144a[. ti• Ffli-.uec tarfd brett ir•rbr Put a cnlariat ,cotitoilni

pF.snra OrutTer crates the carrter-edl shape into the mainbear, Wam with arscl.ul accutacy Lthie nfu tinli s mcalmaintain more of their iginal shape when lo ded

100% Plug-in ContnectorsUItilites mIoduar wining harness leatures 1)10% plug-n

crirectors with internal ,roundwirrng for relge.

eaSy-ti--rainfltian lightinj throughouit ith trnaIr

Integral Winch Track Both SkiesNothing increases veeratlh ty itd load seorrtry lie Iljitth<'s

integral winch track With shtingw '#inches, tere will alw.as be

a winch whete it's needed

Durable. Outr.gge Attch entslAbsorbs load, rather than resisting it. resulting in a longer

outrigger artaclhmeni lilf

Highr Quatly Paint Proce for Lower 1,,

Cycle costsFor rnre protection against rust and corrosion, all main beamsurtaces are shot blasted prior to painting witll a two-partprimter and two-part urethane top coat Interior surfaces of

the main beams are painted with a durable rust preventalive

croaing for lower Tnainie ian/ce costs

Additional Standard Features

Akmlumnu Front RailFor lower iare weight and hihri strength, the aluminum

fro•ti rail prouides proTechtii ease of manterriance,

and durability

Front Stakb lvs; Steel CornersStainless snec cornert and top plates project againstimpact damage and prcilde a3datonnl Strengit, easirmainienarce, and increased dirabhity

Micirownicapulted Acgheak. on ANFillor screwsBetter and Stronget connecicuis, teducngmain, eanc,

Skise Raft are Machmnically FastenedThis allows stIress to flex the connection without lhe

faigue assoc aied wlih ngil welded joints

Contoured Be•t at Rearfor Proper Ails Loadingthis design optimizes load disrinbuton betweenthe axles and extends suspension life

Floer Corners Deslined for HighIkmpact LodsThe dock irrnpact is dstilbnoed into the entire side railresulting in longer tear ral life

Durable Suspeinallon Deaign)pti"rnaed suspersice. structure designed Io mnninzefatigue cracking Yl the main beans and suspoencso

crnponents for externded frame tife

Our Full Line of Flatbeds

m All Steel4tunei and engineered

fo heae-Oduty use the UtiUlity_ _ _ _ _ "n il Steel flatbed te3tures trick

rear corner impact plate; tl protect against

di a lag•iajedi a lapeted frait

W approach plate

-• Drop DeckLitity's heavy-dure, ighi weight dual

bawih drop deck, is spehcadliv designed forhuling heavy or awkward loads Feature, include, a

mahn beam with a large radius in the drop area to allow stress to

lw thr, ugh the entire structure Ullhty's unique one-piece conttlreUuhottorin 11 ange and 31 6" thick rear buckolate gine the trailer additonal strength

moons,,


I-• E N E R Co N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 3tvcef .... Everyrojor E.,., dG1o (Appendix 2)

PAGE NO. 1 of 5

,Appendix 2

Cask Design Input Email

CALC. NO. RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202r/: E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 3F ipa ~(Appendix 2) RV

PAGE NO. 2 of 5

Johnathon McFarland

From: Curt Lindner [clindner@?robateltech.com]Sent: Friday, July 06,2012 4:04 PMTo: John Staples; Johnathon McFarlandSubject: RT-100] - Maximum Payload and Gross Weights

For the purpo ses of preparing the lifting, tie-down and bolting analyses, consider a maximum payload weight as 15000lbs (6820 kg) and a maximum total weight of 41,000 kg (90,200 Ibs). Thesevalues bound the sum of the maximum grossweight in the procurement agreement and the maximum cask weight of 34054 kg (74,920 Ibs) per Robatel drawing RT-100 PE 100 1-1, Rev. C.

Curt Lindner

Lead Engneer, Advanced Analysis

EJ E N E R CON FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.

cli ndner~tenercon. cornoffice: 770-497-8818 x237cell: 678-362-7110


EI l EN ER CO N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV. 3Ex0,fenr ,epojp .... ya,. (Appendix 2)

PAGE NO. 3 of 5

From: C.Dane - ROBATEL

To: John StaDielCc: Curt Undner; Zhibo WuSubject: RE: Tie down

Date: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:08:15 AM

Hi John,

Find attached the filler metal procurement procedure.Unfortunately, it is still only in French.But you can see the filler metal that will be used in tables in chapter 9.2.2.The material anticipated is E308LTO-4 for the weld of the tie down support plate and the outer shell.

The filler metal is E2209T0-4 for the weld between the tie down support plate and the tie down arms(for S31803 material together)

No more thickness modification is allowed and the weld can't be more than 17 mm.

A table of the allowables is in chapter 9.2.4

Regards

Chris


0 E N E R C O N CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET REV 3(Appendix 2)PAGE NO. 4 of 5

FLUXINOX 22.9.3L

a

OERUiKON

Core W'Besi

FluxinOr 22 9.3L ts an akyed rutb flux cored wire, suitable for the joining and cladding Di corrosion resistant err.ibcaustenruc duplex steeLt The weld metal consi% of abcut 30% errte and 70% austenrte and is partcularly rsistant topittdN. crev" corrosion and stress corrsion cr•uig in chloride and hydrojen sulphide bearng media. Prinapalapplatcs inciude the constfucts of chemical plants and offsh.e mstallabtns for operatrng lbampratures up to 250 OC

AWnS k,2 1:1 9O- 1?0~-EN 12,073 T2293N-RM31T2293N.RC3

SA9 -Ot CO=W Ot C rAPJrcMiS, 17 ~f Pxagr:

rinMIyTas oFI7 all-wld etl (ypca alesi

_< 0.04 I 1.20 0.70 22 9 3 - 0.10 35-45

A, ek~id ~ 450 -- 90 1 20 _j 32ýGXrtxst k2 TaF'%419 VIAa2

Shielding Gas Acis To EN 439: W1 l(Arcal2l -Atai6) or G C (Arca 21)

Materialsl 446 J ' 1MN2JJs53-8 03w S0s3-26o sý323Xc

I ý 11 1 -- - IKxep Jry xe3 Lte ruta DC

Packaging data: K300 kg 16

Dometers 1,2 1,6

388


Ii EN ER CON CALCULATION CONTROL SHEET 3.. , o(Appendix 2) REV.

PAGE NO. 5 of 5

In-Flux Sterling® 308L'flat & horizontal

AWS E308LT0-41-1(Dual classified as EXXXTX-1for C02 gas shielding)

DescriptionAn austenitic stainless steel deposit with low carbon used for joining common austenitic stainless steels suchas Types 301, 302, 304, 304L, CF-8, and CF-3. Approvals and conformances: AWS Spec A5.22, ASMESFA5.22

Typical Deposit Analysis %C 0.04Mn 1.10Si 0.70Cr 19.60Ni 9.50Fe Bal.

Typical Properties as WeldedTensile Strength 85,000 psiYield Strenqth 61,000 psiElongation in 2' 43%DeLong Ferrite Number 10

- U.S. Patent No. 4449031

RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202, Rev. 4 - 'RT-100 Tie-Down Evaluation.'3.9 ASME B&PV Code, Section III, 2007...

Documents

Transcript of RTL-001-CALC-ST-0202, Rev. 4 - 'RT-100 Tie-Down Evaluation.'3.9 ASME B&PV Code, Section III, 2007...