RPT ON COMBINED HELICOPTER BORNE AMAG AEM & AVLF …
Transcript of RPT ON COMBINED HELICOPTER BORNE AMAG AEM & AVLF …
l
l
iii
; l
l 1
010
REPORT ONCOMBINED HELICOPTER BORNE
MAGNETIC, ELECTROMAGNETIC AND VLFSURVEY
BENNY PROJECT - PN-232 CARTIER AREA
ONTARIO
RECEIVED
| APR "5 1999
B MINING LANDS SECTION
l
l 1 l
FOR FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED
BYAERODAT LIMITED
February 17, 1989
J8885MNR
li i i i i ii iii l ll ll
l l
41113SEM19 2.12328 MUNSTER 010C
TABLE OF wv
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION 2-1
3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT
3.1 Aircraft 3-13.2 Equipment
3.2.1 Electromagnetic System 3-13.2.2 VLF-EM System 3-13.2.3 Magnetometer ' 3-23.2.4 Magnetic Base Station 3-23.2.5 Radar Altimeter 3-33.2.6 Tracking Camera 3-23.2.7 Analog Recorder 3-23.2.8 Digital Recorder 3-43.2.9 Radar Positioning System 3-5
4. DATA PRESENTATION
4.1 Base Map 4-14.2 Flight Path 4-14.3 Electromagnetic Profiles 4-14.4 VLF-EM Total Field Profiles 4-2
5. INTERPRETATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5-1
APPENDIX I - General Interpretive ConsiderationsAPPENDIX II - PersonnelAPPENDIX III - Certificate of Qualifications
ll
l
l
l
ii lif
i i
LIST Of HAPS
(Scale 1:10,000)
MAPS:
1. AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES;
showing flight lines, fiducials and inphase and quadrature profiles of 33 kHz coplanar response.
2. VLF-EM TOTAL FIELD PROFILES;
showing flight lines, fiducicals, and profiles of VLF- EM response from NSS (Annapolis, Maryland) operating at
l 21.4 kHz.
Jli
1. INTRODUCTION
This report describes an airborne geophysical survey carried out on
behalf of Falconbridge Limited by Aerodat Limited. Equipment
" operated included a four frequency electromagnetic system, a high
l sensitivity cesium vapour magnetometer, a two frequency VLF-EM
system, a power line monitor, a video tracking camera, an altimeter
m and an electronic positioning system. Electromagnetic, magnetic
and altimeter data were recorded both in digital and analog form,
l Positioning data were stored in digital form, encoded on the VHS
it format video tape and recorded at regular intervals in UTM co
ordinates on the analog trace, as well as being marked on the
l flight path map by the operator while in flight.
l
l
l
l
l
i i i
A total of 1,255 kilometres of the recorded data were compiled in
map form of which 291 kilometres is presented in this report
covering claim groups in the following townships:
Stralak Munster Craig Hess Ulster Moncrieff
l l l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
JM
l
l
l
2. SURVEY AREA LOCATION
The survey area is depicted on the index map shown below.
82 00
Sir till
Cr..y
eft lin* r
vtMur i
f w I ff
Unit'
^
•oner if
t K""
M.M
Ermliflgi
Toiiffl
Himn
81
Hum
"J
C.r
Cue
If
Or
30 81
•r
^
*^
t*f
••fi
1
y
C*iAfi*r
Harty
Lt'*M
DOMIAO
Furftcflit
D*niiM
Tyr*A*
'0*
tMTf*A
l4lf*Wf
O*10M*A
Arintm
KtKHtAt
•OMII
Lw(W4*
IttyllM
In i or
fei 1 *r (
HW
V)
H*A
• li
ve
1'*
00
M
•r
wr
Vi
*?iM
^•r 1 1 H
Mtrnin
CtffMI
NrtBA
DBUR1Mtl IK
Bin
Aylivf
1.01 """'"
ttttCitini
^•IMA-vug*
OrrMO
Ci •KAfl
- *6 45
— 4 6 3 0
Ml. 000. 000
l l t* 3. AIRCRAFT AND EQUIPMENT
l3.1 Aircraft
J An Aerospatiale A-Star 350B helicopter, (CG-JIX), owned and
m operated by Lakeland Helicopters Limited, was used for the
B survey. Installation of the geophysical and ancillary equipment
B was carried out by Aerodat. The survey aircraft was flown at a
mean terrain clearance of 60 metres.
l3.2 Equipment
l 3.2.1 Electromagnetic System
m The electromagnetic system was an Aerodat 4-frequency
system. Two vertical coaxial coil pairs were operated at
l 935 Hz and 4.6 kHz and two horizontal coplanar coil pairs
at 4.2 kHz and 33 kHz. The transmitter-receiver
l separation was 7 metres. Inphase and quadrature signals
mm were measured simultaneously for the four frequencies
with a time constant of 0.1 seconds. The electromagnetic
l
i
l
bird was towed 30 metres below the helicopter.
3.2.2 VLF-EM System
System was a Herz Totem 2A. This instrument measures
the total field and quadrature components of two selected
transmitters, preferably oriented at right angles to one
i
liiiiiii ii i ii i i iil
3 - 2
another. The sensor was towed in a bird 12 metres below
the helicopter. The normal configuration of transmitting
stations monitored was NSS, Annapolis, Maryland for the
Line station and NLK, Jim Creek, Washington for the
Ortho station broadcasting at 21.4 and 24.8 kHz re
spectively. Station NAA, Cutler, Maine at 24.5 kHz was
also used and occasionally, combinations of the above
three were required.
3.2.3 Magnetometer
The magnetometer employed a Scintrex Model VI W - 2321
H8 cesium, optically pumped magnetometer sensor. The
sensitivity of this instrument was 0.1 nanoTeslas at a
0.1 second sampling rate. The sensor was towed in a bird
17 metres below the helicopter.
3.2.4 Magnetic Base Station
A Geometrics G-803 magnetometer was operated at the
base of operations to record diurnal variations of the
earth's magnetic field. The clock of the base station was
synchronized with that of the airborne system to
facilitate later correlation.
i l
lm
U
l fl l
El
l
3 - 3
3.2.5 Radar Altimeter
A King KRAI O A radar altimeter was used to record ter
rain clearance. The output from the instrument is a
linear function of altitude for maximum accuracy.
3.2.6 Tracking Camera
A Panasonic video flight path recording system was used
to record the flight path on standard VHS format video
tapes. The system was operated in continuous mode and the
flight number, real time and manual fiducial numbers were
registered on the picture frame for cross-reference to
the analog and digital data.
3.2.7 Analog Recorder
An RMS dot-matrix recorder was used to display the data
during the survey. In addition to manual and time
fiducials, the following data were recorded:
Channel Input
RALT Altimeter (150 m at top
of chart)
CXll 935 Hz Coaxial Inphase
CXQ1 935 Hz Coaxial Quadrature
CXI2 4.6 kHz Coaxial Inphase
Scale
3 m/rara
2.5 ppm/mm
2.5 ppm/mm
2.5 ppm/mm
l l
l
II,, . ^
1li F 1l-..
1 li ' 1MB
li1
li
1fi
|
1|:" l
f '
14"
liISj;.
^i|
Channel
CXQ2
CPU
CPQ1
CPI2
CPQ2
VLT
VLQ
VOT
VOQ
MAGF
MAGC
PWRL
4.6
4.2
4.2
33 *
33 y
VLF-
VLF-
VLF-
VLF-
Magn
Magn
Powe
3.2.8 Digital Recorder
An RMS DGR
tape. Inforn
Equipment
EM system
33 i
natioi
Magnetometer
VLF-EM
Altimeter
l l l l
3 - 4
Input
4.6 kHz Coaxial Quadrature
4.2 kHz Coplanar Inphase
4.2 kHz Coplanar Quadrature
33 kHz Coplanar Inphase
33 kHz Coplanar Quadrature
VLF-EM Total Field, Line
VLF-EM Quadrature, Line
VLF-EM Total Field, Ortho
VLF-EM Quadrature, Ortho
Magnetometer, fine
Magnetometer, coarse
Power Line Monitor
Scale
2.5 ppm/ram
10 ppm/mm
10 ppm/mm
20 ppm/mm
20 ppm/mm
2.5 %/mm
2.5 %/mm
2.5 %/mm
2.5 %/mm
2.5 nT/mm
25 nT/mm
n/a
Recording Interval
0.1 seconds
0.1 seconds
0.2 seconds
0.5 seconds
NAV System 0.2 seconds.
l l
3.2.9 Radar Positioning System
A Syledis SR3 UHF radio positioning system was used for
navigation and track recovery. A network of antennae
provided the pilot/operator with constant navigation
information, with a positional accuracy of i 5 metres.
il li
iii
i i i
ll *
I
II
4. DATA PRESENTATION
4.1 Base Map
l A topographic base map at a scale of 1:10,000 was prepared from
enlargements of Ontario Basic Mapping topographic maps
(originals at 1:20,000).
l4.2 Flight Path
The flight path was derived from the Syledis electronic
positioning system. It is estimated that the flight path is
m generally accurate to about 10 metres with respect to the
B topographic detail of the base map. The flight path is
presented with time and navigator's manual fiducials
l for cross reference to both the analog and digital data.
4.3 Electromagnetic Profiles
The electromagnetic data were recorded digitally at a sample
rate of 10/second with a time constant of 0.1 seconds. A two
8 stage digital filtering process was carried out to reject
major sferic events and to reduce system noise.
lM Local sferic activity can produce sharp, large amplitude
events that cannot be removed by conventional filtering
l procedures. Smoothing or stacking will reduce their amplitude
l
1l
l
l lm
l
l
l
l
lm
l
l
l
l
l
but leave a broader residual response that can be confused
with geological phenomena. To avoid this possibility, a
computer algorithm searches out and rejects major sferic events.
The signal to noise ratio was further enhanced by the ap
plication of a low pass digital filter. It has zero phase
shift which prevents any lag or peak displacement from occur
ring, and it suppresses only variations with a wavelength less
than about 0.25 seconds. This low effective time constant
permits maximum profile shape resolution.
Following the filtering process, a base level correction was
made. The correction applied is a linear function of time that
ensures the corrected amplitude of the various inphase and
quadrature components is zero when no conductive or permeable
source is present. The filtered and levelled data were then
presented in profile map form.
4.4 VLF-EM Total Field Profiles
The VLF-EM data from NSS (Annapolis, Maryland) operating at
21.4 KHz were presented in profile map form.
i * 5. INTERPRETATION
iThe geophysical results presented in this report indicate the exi-
J| stence and position of conductivity anomalies. The response will be
a maximum over the conductor, with the amplitude being related to
m the target's conductance and depth. Most of the surveyed blocks
m exhibit conductivity contrasts which may be interpreted as
structural features. However, a more detailed evaluation of the
l significance of the data presented should be performed by those
most familiar with the local geology and with access to additional
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
geological and geophysical information.
Respectfully submitted,
AERODAT LIMITED
fl February 17, 1989 Anthony E.Valentini
J8885MNR Geophysicist
l
l
l
i l
l
i
APPENDIX I
GENERAL INTERPRETIVE CONSIDERATIONS
l Electromagnetic
The Aerodat four frequency system utilizes two different trans-
" mitter-receiver coil geometries. The traditional coaxial coil
configuration is operated at two widely separated frequencies and
the lower frequency horizontal coplanar coil pair is operated at a
frequency approximately aligned with one of the coaxial frequencies.
The electromagnetic response measured by the helicopter system is
a function of the "electrical" and "geometrical" properties of
the conductor. The "electrical" property of a conductor is deter-
l mined largely by its electrical conductivity, magnetic suscepti
bility and its size and shape; the "geometrical" property of the
l response is largely a function of the conductor's shape and
M orientation with respect to the measuring transmitter and
receiver.
Electrical Considerations
For a given conductive body the measure of its conductivity or
conductance is closely related to the measured phase shift
between the received and transmitted electromagnetic field. A
small phase shift indicates a relatively high conductance, a
large phase shift lower conductance. A small phase shift results
l l
l
i i
- 2
l in a large inphase to quadrature ratio and a large phase shift a
low ratio. This relationship is shown quantitatively for a non-
| magnetic vertical half-plane model on the accompanying phasor
M diagram. Other physical models will show the same trend but
* different quantitative relationships.
lThe phasor diagram for the vertical half-plane model, as pre-
P sented, is for the coaxial coil configuration with the amplitudes
in parts per million (ppm) of the primary field as measured at
the response peak over the conductor. To assist the interpre -
U tation of the survey results the computer is used to identify the
apparent conductance and depth at selected anomalies. The results
l of this calculation are presented in table form in Appendix II
and the conductance and inphase amplitude are presented in symbo-
I lized form on the map presentation.
The conductance and depth values as presented are correct only as
l far as the model approximates the real geological situation. The
actual geological source may be of limited length, have signifi
cant dip, may be strongly magnetic, its conductivity and thick-
M ness may vary with depth and/or strike and adjacent bodies and
overburden may have modified the response. In general the conduc-
tance estimate is less affected by these limitations than is the
l l l l
Conductance in mhos is the reciprocal of resistance in ohms and
l in the case of narrow slab-like bodies is the product of elec-
m trical conductivity and thickness.
l l l l
depth estimate, but both should be considered as relative rather
than absolute guides to the anomaly's properties.
Most overburden will have an indicated conductance of less than 2
mhos; however, more conductive clays may have an apparent conduc
tance of say 2 to 4 mhos. Also in the low conductance range will
be electrolytic conductors in faults and shears.
The higher ranges of conductance, greater than 4 mhos, indicate
that a significant fraction of the electrical conduction is
electronic rather than electrolytic in nature. Materials that
conduct electronically are limited to certain metallic sulphides.
* and to graphite. High conductance anomalies, roughly 10 mhos or
l greater, are generally limited to sulphide or graphite bearing
rocks.
l Sulphide minerals, with the exception of such ore minerals as
sphalerite, cinnabar and stibnite, are good conductors; sulphides
may occur in a disseminated manner that inhibits electricall
l ll conduction through the rock mass. In this case the apparent
conductance can seriously underrate the quality of the conductor
l in geological terms. In a similar sense the relatively non-
j conducting sulphide minerals noted above may be present in
significant consideration in association with minor conductive
l sulphides, and the electromagnetic response only relate to the
minor associated mineralization. Indicated conductance is also of
l little direct significance for the identification of gold minera-
g lization. Although gold is highly conductive, it would not be
expected to exist in sufficient quantity to create a recognizable
l anomaly, but minor accessory sulphide mineralization could pro
vide a useful indirect indication.
l In summary, the estimated conductance of a conductor can provide
a relatively positive identification of significant sulphide or
graphite mineralization; however, a moderate to low conductance
l
l
value does not rule out the possibility of significant economic
mineralization.
Geometrical Considerations
m Geometrical information about the geologic conductor can often be
interpreted from the profile shape of the anomaly. The change in
l shape is primarily related to the change in inductive coupling
among the transmitter, the target, and the receiver.
l
l
l
ili
- 5
l In the case of a thin, steeply dipping/ sheet-like conductor, the
coaxial coil pair will yield a near symmetric peak over the
l conductor. On the other hand, the coplanar coil pair will pass
through a null couple relationship and yield a minimum over the
conductor, flanked by positive side lobes. As the dip of the
conductor decreased from vertical, the coaxial anomaly shape
changes only slightly, but in the case of the cpplanar coil pair
g the side lobe on the down dip side strengthens relative to that
on the up dip side.
s ^W
l As the thickness of the conductor increases, induced current flow
across the thickness of the conductor becomes relatively signifi
cant and complete null coupling with the coplanar coils is no
longer possible. As a result, the apparent minimum of the co
planar response over the conductor diminishes with increasing
m thickness, and in the limiting case of a fully 3 dimensional body
or a horizontal layer or half-space, the minimum disappears
I completely.
A horizontal conducting layer such as overburden will produce a
m response in the coaxial and coplanar coils that is a function of
altitude (and conductivity if not uniform). The profile shape
l will be similar in both coil configurations with an amplitude
ratio (coplanar:coaxial) of about 4:1*.
l
i;-fl|
I
l
l
i*i i i i i i i i i i
In the case of a spherical conductor, the induced currents are
confined to the volume of the sphere, but not relatively res
tricted to any arbitrary plane as in the case of a sheet-like
form. The response of the coplanar coil pair directly over the
sphere may be up to 8* times greater than that of the coaxial
pair.
In summary, a steeply dipping, sheet-like conductor will display
a decrease in the coplanar response coincident with the peak of
the coaxial response. The relative strength of this coplanar null
is related inversely to the thickness of the conductor; a
pronounced null indicates a relatively thin conductor. The dip of
such a conductor can be inferred from the relative amplitudes of
the side-lobes.
Massive conductors that could be approximated by a conducting
sphere will display a simple single peak profile form on both
coaxial and coplanar coils, with a ratio between the coplanar to
coaxial response amplitudes as high as 8*.
Overburden anomalies often produce broad poorly defined anomaly
profiles. In most cases, the response of the coplanar coils
closely follows that of the coaxial coils with a relative ampli
tude ratio of 4*.
i i
l
l
l
l
1
l
l
l
l
l
7 -
Occasionally, if the edge of an overburden zone is sharply
defined with some significant depth extent, an edge effect will
occur in the coaxial coils. In the case of a horizontal conduc
tive ring or ribbon, the coaxial response will consist of two
peaks, one over each edge; whereas the coplanar coil will yield a
single peak.
* It should be noted at this point that Aerodat's definition of
the measured ppm unit is related to the primary field sensed in
the receiving coil without normalization to the maximum coupledL
m ( coaxial configuration). If such normalization were applied to
the Aerodat units, the amplitude of the coplanar coil pair would
be halved.
Magnetics
The Total Field Magnetic Map shows contours of the total magnetic
field, uncorrected for regional variation. Whether an EM anomaly
with a magnetic correlation is more likely to be caused by a
sulphide deposit than one without depends on the type of minera
lization. An apparent coincidence between an EM and a magnetic
anomaly may be caused by a conductor which is also magnetic, or
by a conductor which lies in close proximity to a magnetic body.
The majority of conductors which are also magnetic are sulphides
containing pyrrhotite and/or magnetite. Conductive and magnetic
l
li l
l
8
I bodies in close association can be, and often are, graphite and
magnetite. It is often very difficult to distinguish between
these cases. If the conductor is also magnetic, it will usually
produce an EN anomaly whose general pattern resembles that of them
* magnetics. Depending on the magnetic permeability of the conduc
Ij ting body, the amplitude of the inphase EM anomaly will be wea
kened, and if the conductivity is also weak, the inphase EM
j anomaly may even be reversed in sign.
VLF Electromagnetics
U The VLF -EM method employs the radiation from powerful military
radio transmitters as the primary signals. The magnetic field
l associated with the primary field is elliptically polarized in
the vicinity of electrical conductors. The Herz Totem uses three
coils in the X, Y, Z configuration to measure the total field and
vertical quadrature component of the polarization ellipse.
I The relatively high frequency of VLF (15-25) kHz provides high
response factors for bodies of low conductance. Relatively "dis-
| connected" sulphide ores have been found to produce measureable
m V LF signals. For the same reason, poor conductors such as sheared
contacts, breccia zones, narrow faults, alteration zones and
l porous flow tops normally produce VLF anomalies. The method can
therefore be used effectively for geological mapping. The only
l
l
l
l ll relative disadvantage of the method lies in its sensitivity to
conductive overburden. In conductive ground the depth of explor
l ation is severely limited.
Jm The effect of strike direction is important in the sense of the
fl relation of the conductor axis relative to the energizing elec
tromagnetic field. A conductor aligned along a radius drawn from
j a transmitting station will be in a maximum coupled orientation
and thereby produce a stronger response than a similar conductor
at a different strike angle. Theoretically, it would be possible
H for a conductor, oriented tangentially to the transmitter to
produce no signal. The most obvious effect of the strike angle
l consideration is that conductors favourably oriented with respect
to the transmitter location and also near perpendicular to the
l flight direction are most clearly rendered and usually dominate
the map presentation.ll The total field response is an indicator of the existence and
position of a conductivity anomaly. The response will be a
l maximum over the conductor, without any special filtering, and
strongly favour the upper edge of the conductor even in the case
of a relatively shallow dip.
l
l
l
The vertical quadrature component over steeply dipping sheet-like
l l
i li i
- 10 -
l conductor will be a cross-over type response with the cross-over
closely associated with the upper edge of the conductor.
lM The response is a cross-over type due to the fact that it is the
'* vertical rather than total field quadrature component that is
l measured. The response shape is due largely to geometrical rather
than conductivity considerations and the distance between the
J maximum and minimum on either side of the cross-over is related
m to target depth. For a given target geometry, the larger thisl* distance the greater the depth.
iThe amplitude of the quadrature response, as opposed to shape is
l function of target conductance and depth as well as the conductiv
ity of the overburden and host rock. As the primary field
l travels down to the conductor through conductive material it is
m both attenuated and phase shifted in a negative sense. The secon
dary field produced by this altered field at the target also has
'l an associated phase shift. This phase shift is positive and is
larger for relatively poor conductors. This secondary field is
l attenuated and phase shifted in a negative sense during return
M travel to the surface. The net effect of these 3 phase shifts
determine the phase of the secondary field sensed at the
receiver.
l11
l A relatively poor conductor in resistive ground will yield a net
positive phase shift. A relatively good conductor in more conduc-
m tive ground will yield a net negative phase shift. A combination*
m is possible whereby the net phase shift is zero and the response
is purely in-phase with no quadrature component.m
A net positive phase shift combined with the geometrical cross*
l over shape will lead to a positive quadrature response on the
m side of approach and a negative on the side of departure. A net
negative phase shift would produce the reverse. A further sign
l reversal occurs with a 180 degree change in instrument orien
tation as occurs on reciprocal line headings. During digital
l processing of the quadrature data for map presentation this is
B corrected for by normalizing the sign to one of the flight line
* headings.
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l.
i iii FIELD
Flown
Pilot
Operator
APPENDIX II
PERSONNEL
January, 1989
- Roger Morrow
- Steve Robinson
i i i iilli
OFFICE
Processing
Report
- Anthony E. Valentini
- George McDonald
- Anthony E. Valentini
* APPENDIX III
l CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS
.-•m Anthony E. Valentini
1. l am a geophysicist and have been working in this field since 1985.
fm 2. l reside at 48 Village Drive, Stoney Creek, Ontario.
l 3.1 hold an honours B.Se. in Geophysics from the University ofWestern Ontario having graduated in 1985.
4. l hold the position of Geophysicist at Aerodat Limited. I have been employed by Aerodat since July 1986.
B 5. l am a member of the Canadian Exploration Geophysical r. Society.
ll 6 . The accompanying report was prepared from a review of the^ a irborne geophysical survey flown by Aerodat for FalconbridgeJ Limited. I have not visited the property.
i: .
1 7. I have no interest in the property described nor do I hold any securities in Falconbridge Limited.
l . Signed,
l
l
l
Mississauga, Ontario Anthony E. ValentiniGeophysicist
Ontario41M3SETO19 2.12326 MUNSTER 900
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministere du D6veloppement du Nord et des Mines November 24, 1989
Mining Lands Section 880 Bay Street, 3rd Floor Toronto, Ontario M5S 1Z8
Telephone: (416) 965-4888
Your File: W8907-045 Our File: 2.12328
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development and MinesBag 3000200 Brady Street, 6th floorSudbury, OntarioP3A 5W2
Dear Sir:
Re: Notice of Intent dated October 23, 1989 for Geophysical (Magnetometer and Electromagnetic) Survey submitted on Mining Claims S 993569 et al in Ulster, Moncrieff, Hess, Munster and Craig Townships.
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
W.R. CowanProvincial Manager, Mining LandsMines A Minerals Division
Enclosure
cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining and Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario
Falconbridge Ltd. Falconbridge, Ontario
Anthony E. Valentini Stoney Creek, Ontario
Michael J. Gray Sudbury, Ontario
ONtARIO QiOLOQICAL SURVEY
ASSESSMENT FILESOFFICE
NUV2& 1989
RECEIVED
Resident Geologist Sudbury, Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Technical Assessment Work Credits
Ontario o*w
October 23. 1989
2,12328
-045
Recorded Holder
Township or AreaFALCONBRIDGE LTD.
ULSTER. MONCRIEFF. HESS. MUNSTER. AND CRAIG TOWNSHIPS.Type of curvey and number of
Assessment day? credit per claim Mining Claims AacxMd
Geophysical
Electromagnetic. 40
Magnetometer.
Radiometric
40
Induced polarization.
Other. ^^
-days
.days
.days
.days
.da yi
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column
Geological __________________days
Geochemical __________________days
Man days Q
Special provision Q
Airborne
Ground
993569993653 to 656 incl.9940961013391-921042317 to 63 incl.10423671042369 to 372 incl.10423781042388 to 392 incl.1042397-9810424001042461 to 467 incl.1042469-701042479 to 487 incl.1042946, 10429521046856 to 881 incl.1046885 to 914 incl.1046916 to 944 incl.
("l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.
O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.
Special credits under section 77 (161 for the following mining claims
10 days Airborne VLF+10 days Airborne Electromagnetic S 993568, 993570, 994048 1042368, 1042377, 1042387, 1046883-84.
20 days Airborne VLF * 15 days Airborne Electromagnetic S 830744 to 747 1ncl.
No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims
BQ not sufficiently covered by the survey
S 1042468 1042488 1042504
Q insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if neceiury in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not *Kimw*t *Ho**cd*t tallomi G*opftf**c*f - BO; Gco'ogoor -*O; G*ocrwmlc*( * 40; Section 77(191-CO.
'^~ 'Ministry otNorthern Development and Mines
ntaA^
JRv
Report of Work
(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures
Mining ActType of Surveytsl *- Ej^.t.n-toMntot4 e,r ,
Geophysical (Ajrborne Mag/Em)Claim Holder(s)
Falconbridge Limited
Page l of 5- Please type or print.
number of mining claims traversed xcecds space on this form, attach a list.
Note: - Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered in t hi! "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
Do not use shaded arcns below.
(ft,e.4t*f46 , or Aroa
Benny -Cartier Arearospector's Licence Ro
AddressA 21647
P.O. Box 40. Falconbridge. Ontario POM ISOSurvey Company
Aerodat Ltd.DOU of Survey gjom ^o, J gg
Day J Mo. j Yr. j Day | Mo. | Vr. Name and Address of Author (of Goo-Technical report)
Anthony E. Valentini 48 Village Dr. .Stoney Creek, Ontario /y/E -.
Total Miles of line Cut
N/A
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
j SUDl1 "1!MX.
Man Days
Completi and ente
R EC E:reverse side
A. M.7!8!9I10HI)12|
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
' E lectromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
- Electromag letic
199?- Magnetomt ter
r. M.
' - Other , ,(J
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Days per Claim
—— — ——
Days per Claim
. ————— .
Days per Claim
40
-40-
Expenditures (excludes powerjtrjppjj;Type of Work Performed J& C V* C 1 V C \J
Performed on Claim(s) ' : ~ ^i : f ' f \ 19198*
MINING LANDS SECTIONCalculation o' Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S -h 1
Total Days Credits
5 =Instructions
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Date - ,-
YfftfReco
Certification Verifying Report of Work '
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
SNumlicr
1042483
104246310424641042465
1042466
1042468
1042469
.J 042470
1042479
J04JA8Q....
1046857
1046858
1046859
1046860
1046861 .
.1Q46872
10468731046874
10468751046876
1046916
Expend. Days Cr.
80
808080
80
80
80
80
80
-BO-
80
8080
80
80
80
80
80
8080
-80
Ito U. 6-re^ /K- dirou* - fi- O^.DT.
Mining ClaimPrefix
SNumber
1046917
1046918
10469191046920
1046921
1046923
1046924
1046925
1046931
1046932
1046933
1046934
1046935
1046936
1046937
1046938
1046939
10469401046941
10469421046943
JQ46944. _
Expend. Days Cr.
80
80
8080
80
80
80
80
80
8080
80
8080
80
80
80
8080
8080
80
lotal number of mining claims covered by this log report of work. io^
lotal Days Cr. Date Recorded Recorded
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hcinto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Perton Certifying
__ Michael J. Gray 16-351 Uellington Hts,f Date Certif
Sudbury, Ontario P3E 3V8 | ? farf tftffied Certified by (Signature)
Ontarii
Ministry olNorthern Development
nd Mines
Report of Work '
(Geophysical. Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Page 2 of 5
Type of S urveyU"SUDBURY Mining Act
Instructions: Please type or print.- H number of mining claims traversed
oxcftccli space on this form, attach a l ist.Note: Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be enteredin (he "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
Do tint use shaded areas below.
R E C E l V E DClaim Holder(s)
Township 01 Arnn
Prospector's Licence
APR o- tebAddress
Survey Company
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Tcchnical report)
Date of Survey (from Si t o)
Day l Mo. | Yr, Dny l Mo. l Yr.
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSnocial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This -- i ncludes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
RfctWMMte ^VLF
Days per Clnini
———————
Days per Claim
——————
Days per Claim
40
40Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrc*ix
SNiirnticr
1046856104686210468631046864104686510468891046890104689110468921046893104689410468951046896
,1Q468?7..- 104690410469051046906
10423271042320104232910423301042331
Expend. Dnyc O.
8080808080808080808080808080808080
8080808080
rY* C*. K trying S reCiCklul ~(*r
tvtopWj^^ i t.*-t -
W Prefix
S
ining Clnini Number
104233210423331042334 10*2336104235710424001042481104248210424841042485104248610424871042488104250410468711046877 ^ 1046878
..104687 .9 , 104688010468811046883 *1046884 *1046922
Expend. Days Gr.
808080808080808080808080808080
-SO- SO
.10 8080"to
*fee-80
Total number of mining cl.iims covered by this report of work.
Date Recorded Holder or Agen
Certification Verifying Report of Work
FoTotal Days Cr. Recorded
Office Use OnlyDate Recorded
D&t* Approved os Recorded
^
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowlcdgn of Ihn fncts set foith in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the nnnexed icport is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Dale Certified .
Atn-/ I'lM -
Ministry ofNorthern Development
nd Mines
Report of Work
(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Page 3 of 5Instruction!-, Please type or print.
If number of mining claims traversed exceeds space on this form,attache list.
Note: - Only days credits calculated in the "Expenditures" section may be entered
ci* \*A iV'OType of Surveyd)
Claim Holderd)
Address
Survey Company
SUDBURY—————— Ml.'il.'n G!'/. ——— — —
RECEIVE D
APR o - 190.1A. M. r'-".
7|8!911.0W|121i|?J1K!5!0
. in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns. Mining Act - DO nol usc ti,adcd areas below.
Township or Aica
Prospector's Licence No.
i-——-" ' f 1 " —— — - Uaie of Survey (from (b to) Total Miles of line Cut 1 "' U
j3".'tS y p' ' Day 1 Mo. 1 Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.Name and Address of Author {of Geo-Techmc*l report)
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This - includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
RxHeimrtiii AM" r f
Days per Claim
——————
Days per Claim
——————
Days per Claim
40
40Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Type of Work Performed
Performed on Ciaim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
S -f- 15
Total Days Credits
s
Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrefix
SNumber
1046926
10469271046928
10469291046930
1013391
1013392
1042317
10423181042319
1042320
1042321 ^ 1042322
1042323
104,2324.....
10423251042326
1042335
10423371042338
1042339
1042340
Expend. Days Cr.
8080
90 8080
80
80
80
8080
80
jBpM 80
80
80
80
80
80
8080
-80^
80' iv\AicrrnM.'Ys rt ft r ho rf 'i'""
C 1C" t.ipKij-'.ic O~( - -
Mining ClaimPrefix
SNumber
1042341
1042342104234310423441042345
1042346
1042347
1042348
1042349
10423501042351
1042352
1042353
48tj?iulUHtOJ J1042356
-10*2360,.., 10423611042362
104236310423671042368 *
Expend. Days Cr.
80
8080
8080
8080
80
80
8080
80
-,8JL-8R""{JO 8080
80
80
80
80
80a9w. otr
1 ot.il mi inlier of mining claim* covorotf by this report of work.
Certification Verifying Report of Work
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days O. Recorded
Date Recorded
Date Approved es Recorded
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hnreto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address o f Person Certifying
Onto Certified
Page 4 of 5
© Ministry ol Report of Work Instructions: - Please type or print. Northern Development - H number of mining claims traversed
^^nd Mines (Geophysical, Geological, exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Ontark^A Geochemical and Expend lures) Note:- Only days credits calculated in the
3P? ^ Expenditures section may be entered fj 1 ^̂ l o . 'n | |M! "Expend. Days Cr." columns. ^•••' v p. —— ...... Mining Act .. Do not IISR shndud areas below.Type of Survey(s)
Claim Holdcr(s)
Address
Survey Company
•-i LJ LJ L5 IJ i -i JMI(Jli\!G l)!V.
"VM. - r~7j p.t tl l1f;in|J?|H?n|.'; !'il'': '
/Yj——--~-y
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)^ i l\ ' \ .
Township or Area
Prospi-r.ior's Licence No.
Date ol Survey (from 6 to)
Day | Mo. | Yr. j Day | Mo. | Vr.
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This
- includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
* Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
-Radiocoeiuc. MM p -
Days perClaim
——————
Days per Claim
Days per Claim
—4JL-
40
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Oavs Credits
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrefix
SNun iltcr
10423691042370
...1Q42371.... 10423721042377 *10423781042387 *10423881042389
...1042390.. 1042391^104239^"^
104239810424611012462 . 1042467
.1046886 .. 1046887.... .. .1046888
. 1.046898.™ ...10.4.6899..
1046900
Expend,Dayt Cr.
808080
—80,
80*oee
80
80
8080
—SO- SO
.JO.Oft Ov
80...80., -80.
808.0—
..BO.. 80S^iSeTP!LSucJa!L'' -
Mining ClaimPrefix
SNumber
104690110469021046903 .. 104690710469081046909104691010469111046912
...1046913....... 1046914994096
....-1041952... 1042J16
-.9.93.5.6.9.... —193553. ...
..9936.5.4-. 993655
Expend. Days Gr.
808080808080808080
808080 80
-SJL. —SO-
SO
Totnl number of mining claims covered by this report of work.
Date3* Recorded Holder or
Certification Verifying Report of Work
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days O. Rccordnd
Date Recorded
Date Approved as Recorded
Mintnq HocorOor
Stanch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge ol the (acts set forth in the FlRporl of Work annexed IHMCIO, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion nnd the annexed repnit is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Date Certified
3
Ministry ofNorthern Development
id Mines
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Mining Act
Page 5 of 5Instructions: Please type or print.
— { f number of mining claims traversedexceeds space on thit form, attach a fist.
Note: - Only days credits calculated in the"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Surveyls)
Claim HolderU)
Township or Area
Address
lPrbipcctdr*i Ufconce~No.
Survey Company
Name and Address of Author {of Geo-Tochnical report)
Date of Survey (from ft to)
Day j Mo. | Yr, J Day j Mo. | Yr.
Total Miles of line Cut
Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man D
Cora ne
yj - ' -— ' ^^ tj LJ 1
F3 p* pi t-- t \idieie reVertfr^iafr. l V enter total (s) here
APR o ~ 19A. M.
7|fil?UO!ll|12Jl|2f
t
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electr
- Magnc
- Radio
- Other
Geological
GeochemicJV ——, Geophytic
'E Q.^Q - Magn
SLK v/h-' Geological
omagnetic
tometer
metric
al
1
)magnetic
(ometer
metric
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
RO-K^H•tfVUF'
Days perClaim
Days per Claim
Days perClaim
an
40Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
SInstructions
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.
Date Recorded Holder
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
S
'' . l
- .'. 'V . * -i
,. ' .' f.
Number
104686610468671046868104686910468701046885830744 *830745 -f
R3n?4fi *
830747
993568 *
993570
993656 —
994048
Expend. Days Cr,
808080808080
i*-AfrM c* o fldP W"
35 Afl
AIM-
20 8*
ZO&fl
-
4 t C*
' Mining ClaimPrefix
'
NumberExpend. Days Cr.
F. IvtAiiifTiurVtS rc.f.M,fA U.r Total number of mining fAr i^pHn^f co-C. - claims covered by this
report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded
Date Recorded
Date Approved as Recorded
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowl/dge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Date Certifiod Certified
OWNS :HlR
! - ---L.-!--^ — - — L - __--
-C3350S i i aaiC4 v'-1 -8** 60 ft*
MONCRIEFF TWP. HESS TOWNSHIP
41M3SE88I9 2.12328 MUNSTER
Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and Mines
Ontario
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
PUN
G~ 4090TOWNSHIP
MUNSTER
M.N.R. ADMINlSTRAnVE DISTRICT
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYLAND TITLES/REGtSTBY DIVIS10H
SUDBURY
Scale 1:20 000
1000Metres
1000 2000
1000 Feet ST-
10OO 2000 3000 500* 60OO TOM SOO4 90OO^-i~~
10OOO:——i FM!
Contour Interval 10 Metres
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
URO- M ining Rights Only .SflO- Surface Righte OnlyM -*- S - Mining and Surface Rights
SYMBOLS Oncriptkm
Sec. 3Kb)
Disposition
26/2/88 M + SBoundary
Township, Meridian, Baseline.
Road allowance; surveyed... shoreline...
Lot/Concession; surveyed, unsurveyed
Parcel; surveyedunsurveyed
Right-of-way; roadrailway utility.
Reservation
Cliff, Pit, Pile............................
ConlourInterpolatedApproximateDepression...,.......................
Control point (horizontal)
Flooded land . ; ..........................
Mine head frame
Pipeline {above ground)
Railway; single track, double track abandoned
Road; highway, county, township access trait, tjush
Shoreline (original).
Transmission line
Wooded af'ea. .........,.. . .^...,........
WTE OF ISSUE
JUN 2 6 U86^^^^^
mmr. ^MHMB gECMpgrg flFHCE
NOTES
Flooding on Lower Onaping Lohe ond Nut Bay to contour elevation (H. O feel. LO. 9839 R le 3857
DiSPCSlTICM OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface S Mining Rights .................................... .0Surface Rights Only ........ .............,.................. .O
Mining Rights Only. .........................................®
LeaseSurface S Mining Rights ............ -....................... .H
Surface Rights Only ........ ....... .......... ........ IV..... .HMining Rights Only . . ....... ................................ .Q
Licence of Occupation ................,... .................... .T
Order-in-Council............................................. .OC
Cancelled .....................,............................. ©
Reservation...............:............. -.................... (D
Sand S Gravel....... .... . .................................... ©
/
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.
The disposition of lanti location of to! fabric and parcel boundarie* this index was compiled for administrative purposes only. <
ULSTER .JT.WP.
*n* its734696 . } S. 7J4697
*oo .' l i
' in \ l ftl V'/••:v v ; #v
i l zte l
41I13SE8819 S.12388 MUNSTER 210
-
6ajfi
161 r ^
-'.-\ r /^- "'-- ' :'^-\ " ^"- '' \' ^
rv^^o^^LTvv)r 43i ) i ' ' '.— . /X
''rO "" ' -^J-^ ' 4?S . -
J
^ L
TOFFLEMIRE.'-i . -'40*
X -:'-)
-i-
TOWNSHIP,——— -™-. -,-r- - . ---^- - ^. -
" l' \ --
S*
y-""
S
X^ r'
i..-^.....1 ^rB D C
"s.
44OOOOmE j^^
r-T-
1081*48* 9*46*
2O
7OWF 1 7
30
"50
Jfl
50 60 81*42* 4470OO-iE
Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and Mines
Ontario
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
PLAN
G-2952TOWNSHIP
CRAIG
MJK.K. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
ESPANOLAMIPWING DIVISION
SUDBURYUIND TITLES/REGISTRY DIVISION
SUDBURY
Scale 1:20 OOO
1DM1=1*
100* 2DMHZl h
1000 F**t H l-*
1000 2OO* 3*00 4000 500* TOM •00*l—
9000 1*000
Contour Interval 10 Mrttrea
SYMBOLSBoundary
Township, Meridian, Baseline.
Road allowance; surveyed shoreline
Lot/Concession; surveyed, unsurveyed
Parcel; surveyedunsurveyed
Right-of-way; roadrailway utility.
Reservation
Cliff, Pit, Pile
ContourInterpolated ..........................Approximate Depression.
Control point (horizontal)
Roodedland............... -...---
Mine head frame ....... -.:... - - - - -......
Pipeline (above ground)
Railway; single track, double track abandoned
Road; highway, county, township access trail/bush
Shoreline (original).
Transmission line
Wooded area............................
A
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface ft Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only
LeaseSurface S Mining Rights Surface Rights Only Mining Rights Only
Licence of Occupation ....
Order-in-Counctl.
Cancelled
Reservation..
Sand fi Gravel............
B .Q
.oc
. ©
DATE OF ISSUE
JUN16888suownr
tfffliig RECORDER? OFBCE
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
MRO- M ining Rights OnlySRO- Surface Rights OnlyM 4- S - Mining and Surface Rights
Order No. D*t*
ESZ.-SB/BO W 4/33 14/6/82 S RO. 157S
NOTES
—**E SUBDIVISION OF T HIS TOWNSHIP INTO LOTS AND CONCESSI
S ANNULLED AUGUST 21. 1 953.
f
IL V
x j i s /l 9.9O70*——J l 9157
CART!ER
4H13SEW19 2.12328 MUNSTER
.. . .. .. i J til j" v r. .
Ministry of ^y\ Natural
Resources Ciitario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
SERVICE AJ*..-
3KDLX TO LAND DEPOSITION
PUN
G-4062TOWNSHIP
HESS
M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYUNO TITLES/REGISTRY C.VISIGN
SUDBURY
1000
Scale 1:20 000
9 1000 2000Mvtrn M*tr*t
Contour interval 10 Metres
SYMBOLS.Boundary
Township, Meridian, Baseline.
Road allowance; surveyed...shoreline...
Lot/Concession; surveyed.
Parcel; surveyedunsurveyed
Right-of-way; roadrailway utility..
Reservation
Cliff. Pit, Pile ...................................... ———————
Contour .....................................,.... —— zo ———interpolated ....,........,......,............... - ————— —Approximate ................ 771"........"........ — ^-^ —Depression.....,............................... -^. ———-*
Control point (horizontal) ...................... ................ A
Flooded land......,............,.,................ ^HHHHHHHK:-!
Mine head frame ..,........................................... Q
Pipeline (above ground) .........................,,. ——— ———
Railway; single track............................... ——*————•~double track. abandoned..
Road; highway, county, township access trail, bush
Shoreline (original).
Transmission line..
WDoded area......,............................... X
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface i Mining RightsSurface Rights OnlyMining Rights Only......,.........................,....
v LeaseSurface S Mining RightsSurface Rights OnlyMining Rights Only............,...;....................
Licence of Occupation
Order-in-Council.
Cancelled
Reservation
Sand S Gravel....".".......................................
.H
.Q
.oc
. ©
.o
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION
MRO - N&ning Rights OnlySRO- So-iace Rights OnlyM 4- S --Mining and Surface Rigr-.f
Description Order Ho. Date
W.59/BB.
Disposition
S. R. O.
Fif*
SUbDIVISIOH OF THIS TOWNSHIP - HiTO LOTS AND CONCESSIONS WAS PARTIALLY
ANNULLED APRIL 2lil. 1353 (LOTS? TD 12, CONS. 3 A ND 4, AND LOTS 5 TO 1 2
CONS. 5 AND G EXCEPTED.)
fr 41 f 7U
LSTE
R
TOW
NSH
IPG
-4II7
j——
S
c
Z
ecc
is l !s
g o: s tr s o:i D
g Z) gS
OD
S
QQ 5
CD
*
Q
g O
P
Ql
Z)
SZ
CO
i
CO 3
CO
* -
J7* ̂ ̂ "- -^ ——— .-AM-M^MA. I?
M.N.R. ADMIHISTRATIW KSTHICT
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
SUDBURYLAND TITUS/REGISTRY BIVISION
SUDBURY. MONCRIEFF
F*st
Contour Interval 10 Metres
1^- -*- t*
It-
SYMBOLSBoundary " *,
* Township1 , Meridian, Baseline.
Head allowance; surveyed.. - * shoreline.. V
Lot/Concession; surveyed
Parcel; sun*
unsurveyed
Rigttt-of-way; road ..* -railway
utility..
Reservation
Cliff, Pit, Pile..........
Contour Interpolated ApproximateDepression.........
Control point (horizontal) ...................................... A
Flooded land ...................................... --i~i-~-~-~-----i---~
Mine head frame .............................................. a
Pipeline (above ground) ...........,,-............... —— ——
Railway; single track j w............................ -1——'——l~^ ,. doubje track................ ; ............. -*——H——*
abandoned............................... -i— —'— —'
'Road; highway, county, township .................... ^-^^—-^access .V.... ..V?. .*'.f..................... ====--===
^-— -' trail,bush......................... ...*..... ——————
Shoreline (original).... .tT..... ..,................. .-•• 1 •"""•-•••-
Transmission k-t ,. -........,..............,....... - - *- ~ - *
Wooded area.
fr-*- -*.
C'^ ^** **" 7
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS.•"tJW*
PatentSurface A Mining Rights Surface Rights Only... Mining Rights Orrfy
LeaseSurface 4 Mining Rights Surface Rights Only....
' Mining Rights Only
Licence of Occupation ....
brder-in-Council.
Cancelled ............ *..
Reservation
Sand 4 Gravel............
.B U
©
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION -
MRO- Mining Rights Only SRO- Surface Rights OnlyM f S - Mining and Surface Rights
Description Ortfer No. Data Disposition
SEC 36/80 W 4, j? 14/6/12 S. B. Oei-* - ''"
8EC.SC/eO HN^W.Sa/M S .ft O
RI*
137*85
SAND AND QflAVEL
DHD eWMCL NttEKVC . *XC tto. 1*14* A 74444,
MTC OWWEL PIT H*. 4O5
MTC GRAVEL PIT No. 4C4O
O
2 m
\
i
on r
NOTES
H
t) SUMMVIMQN OF TtM
MTH JUME (Ml.
Z) 4OO FOOT SUHFfcCC MOHTS MEtERM*tlQM AROUND 4U.
LAKES AtC MVCM.
3) OOWE5 LAKE PCVELOPHMT PLAN OATtU IITH AWE tVTO.
PLE 1810*5.
WAAfMULLD
700CT1V(S .
1989SUDBURY
RECORDER'S OFFICE
-14-
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources.
The disposition of land, location of lot fabric and parcel boundaries on. this index was compiled for administrative purposes only.
Q i
f
AERO
DAT
HEM/
MAG/
VLF
SURVEY
Th
is
map
w
as
com
pile
d
from
data
ob
tain
ed
du
rin
g
a helicopte
r m
ag
ne
tic
and
ele
ctr
om
agnetic
su
rvey
ca
rrie
d
ou
t by
A
er o
dat
Lim
ite
d.
The
four
frequency
EM
bird
was
t o
wed
at
an
a
l t i
t u
de
of
30m
i
the
cesiu
m va
po
ur
mag
net
orne
t e
r at
43
m,
and
l he
VLF
sen
sors
C
TOTE
M-2
A)
at
47m
. Th
e a
vera
ge flig
ht
lin
e
sp
acin
g
was
1 O
Orn.
N
avig
ation
and
flig
ht
path
re
co
ve
ry
were
e
ffe
cte
d
usm
g
a S
yle
diS
UH
F n
avig
atio
n
syste
m a
nd
a VM
S v
i deo
sy
s t e
m.
VL
F-E
M
PR
OF
ILE
S
Sta
tion;
NSS
(A
nn
ap
olis
, M
ary
lan
d)
21.4
kH
z
f r—
^
VLF
-EM
T
ota
l F
ield
In
tensity
(2.
5 X
/rrr
n)
Lane
MUQK?
lv*t
a**VM
W** 1*1111'
llfl**"*,*^
FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED
VLF
-EM
P
RO
FIL
ES
o Q
Q
24
KH
z2.1
BENNY PROJECT -
PN 232
CARTIER AR
EA,
ONTARIO
AERODAT LIMITED
AE
RO
DA
T
HE
M/M
AG
/VL
F
SU
RV
EY
Th
is
map
w
as
co
mpile
d
fro
rnd
ata
ob
tain
ed
du
rin
g
a h
eiic
opte
r m
agne
t L c
an
d ele
ctr
om
ag
ne
tic
Surv
ey
carr
ied
ou
t by
A
er o
dat
Li
mi te
d.
The
fo
ur
fre
qu
en
cy
EM
bird
w
as
to w
e d
at
an
altitude
Of
30m
,
the
ce
sium
va
pour
mag
net
omet
er
at
43m
, an
d th
e
VLF
se
nso
rs
CTO
TEM
-2A
) at
47m
, T
he
ave
rag
e flig
ht
tin
e
sp
acin
g
was
10
0m.
Navig
ation
and
flig
ht
path
re
co
very
w
ere
eff
ecte
d
usin
g
a S
yle
dis
UH
F navig
ation
syst
em
an
d a
VMS
vid
eo
Sys
tem
.
VL
F-E
M
PR
OF
ILE
S
St a
t i o
n :
MSS
(A
nna
polis
, M
ary
land)
21
.4
KH
z
VLF
-EM
T
ota
l F
ield
In
tensity
C2.
5
X/r
rm)
82
00
81
00
46
30
FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED
2. 12
-EM PROFILES
24 KHz
BENNY PROJECT -
PN 232
CARTIER AREA, ONTARIO
O
330
660
SC
ALE
1:1
0,0
00
1320
26
40
Fee
t
100
JOG
500
1000
we;r
es
AERODAT LIMITED
DAT
EJA
N
'98
9
NTS
N
o:
41
| /i
3
MAP
N
lo:
2-V
PR
QF
C
LA
iMffi8
85-2
T
AE
RO
DA
T
HE
M/M
AG
/VL
F
SU
RV
EY
Th
is
map
w
as
com
pile
d
from
data
obta
ined
du
rin
g
a helic
opte
r m
agnetic
and
ele
ctr
om
agnetic
su
rve
y
carr
ied
out
by
Ae
rod
at
Lim
ited.
The
four
fre
qu
en
cy
EM
bird
w
as
low
ed
at
an
altitu
de
of
30m
,
the
ce
siu
m
vapour
ma
gn
eto
me
ter
at
43m
, an
d th
e
VLF
se
nso
rs
CTO
TEM
-2A
) at
47m
. T
he
ave
rag
e flig
ht
tine
spacin
g
was
10
0m.
Navig
ation
and
flig
ht
path
re
covery
w
ere
eff
ecte
d
usin
g
a S
yle
dis
UH
F navig
ation
Sys
tem
an
d a
VMS
v i d
eo
SyS
t em
.
EM PROFILES
Copi
anar
40
______
32______
32
ppm/
mmKH
z in
phas
e KH
z quadr at
ur e
82
00 F
AL
CO
NB
RID
GE
L
IMIT
ED
EL
EC
TR
OM
AG
NE
TIC
P
RO
FIL
ES
o3
2
KH
z
BENNY PROJECT -
PN 232
CARTIER AREA, ONTARIO
AERODAT LIMITED
41
M3
SE
ae
i9
2.1
23
28
M
UN
ST
ER
AER
OD
AT
HE
M/M
AG
/VLF
SU
RVE
YT
his
m
ap
was
com
pile
d
fro
m data
obta
ined
du
rin
g
a helicopte
r m
ag
ne
ttc
and
ele
ctr
om
ag
ne
tic
surv
ey
ca
rrie
d
ou
t by
A
ero
da
t Lirm
ted.
The
fo
ur
fre
que
ncy
EM
bird
w
as
to w
e d
at
an
altitu
de
O
f 30
rn
t th
e
cesiu
m
vap
ou
r m
ag
neto
me
ter
at
43m
, and
the
V
LF
se
nsors
C
TOTE
M-2
A3
at
47rn
. T
he
avera
ge
f figh
t lin
e
spacin
g
was
10
0m.
Navig
ation
and
flig
ht
path
re
covery
w
ere
effecte
d
usin
g
a S
yle
dis
U
HF
na
vig
atio
n
syste
m
and
a VH
S v
i deo
s yS
t em
.
Cop
l anar
40
ppm
/rrm
/"——
—S
32
KH
z t n
ph
ase
-._
....
..
32
KH
z q
ua
dra
ture
A fv
ta I^
M i
^^^^
^n^•
FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED
ELECTROMAGNETIC PROFILES
g
J 2
Q 9 a 32
KHz
BENNY PROJECT -
PN 232
CARTIER AREA, ONTARIO
o r^-
AERODAT LIMITED
MAP No:
2-UH CLAIMS J8885-2
41113558819 2,13328 MUNSTER
230
I.IC
S
AER
OO
AT
HE
M/M
AG
/VLF
S
UR
VE
YT
his
m
ap
was
co
mp
iled
fr
om
data
obta
ined
du
rin
g
a helicopte
r m
ag
ne
tic
and
ele
ctr
om
agnetic
su
rve
y
ca
rrie
d
ou
t by
A
ero
da
t Lim
ited.
The
four
frequency
EM
bird
w
as
tow
ed
at
an
a
ltitu
de
o
f 30
m
t th
e
cesi
um
va
po
ur
magneto
mete
r at
43
m,
and
the
V
LF
sen
sors
C
TOTE
M-2
A)
at
47rn
. Th
e a
vera
ge
flig
ht
lin
e
spacin
g
was
10
0m.
Na
vig
atio
n
and
flig
ht
path
re
co
ve
ry
wer
e e
ffe
cte
d
usin
g
a S
yle
dis
UH
F n
avig
atio
n
syst
em
an
d a
VMS
vid
eo
syst
em
.
EM
PR
OF
ILE
S
Gio
an
ar
40
ppm
/mm
_______
32
KHz
inph
ase
— ,..
. —
—
32
KHz
quadra
ture
82
00S
i 00
DBU
R
46
45
46
30
FALC
ON
BR
IDG
E
LIM
ITE
D
ELE
CTR
OM
AG
NE
TIC
P
RO
FIL
ES
32
KH
z
BE
NN
Y
PR
OJE
CT
- PN
232
CARTIER AREA, ONTARIO
SCAL E
1 = 10,000
O 33
0 66
0 '32
0 26
40
Feet
^____^____^________l
O
100
200
500
000
Me
lre
s
AERGDAT LIMITED
DA
TE
: JA
N
1989
NTS
N
o:
41
1/1
3
MAP
3-U
H
CLA
IMS
J8
88
5-3
H
N
AERODAT HEM/MAG/VLF SURVEY
This
ma
p wa
s compiled from d
ata
obtained during a
heli
copter
magnetic an
d el
ectr
omagnet t
c
survey carried ou
t. by
Ae
roda
t Li
mi ted.
Th
e f o
ur frequency EM
bird was
t owed at
an
a l t
i t u
de
of 30m
i ih
e cesium vapour
magnetometer
at 43m
r an
d th
e VL
F sensors CTOTEM-2A) at
47
m.
The
average fl
ight
li
ne spac
ing
wes
1 00m
. Na
vi gat i on an
d flight pa
th recovery were
e
1 f ect ed
us ing a
SyiediS UH
F navigation system an
d a
VMS
v i deo
Sy
st em.
VLF-EM PROFILES
Station: MS
S (A
nnap
olis
, Maryland) 21.4 kH
z
VLF-EM Tota
l Fi
eld
Intens
ity
(2. 5
Z7mm
)
f
' ± ~
IS o
if-j
*m*m*.
V S
FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED
VLF-EM PROFILES
KHz
BENNY PROJECT -
PN 232
CARTIER AREA, ONTARIO
, ..
?-: l- -
: --:!
; '.V
.-.V
Jj^V
SC
ALE
l:10
,000
LIM
ITE
DN
TS
No
: 4
1 l/M
3
3-V
PR
OF
CL
Atk
ffi8
85
-3